Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
The fifth anniversary of the statutory recognition procedure in Schedule A1 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 presents a timely opportunity to evaluate the Central Arbitration Committee’s (CAC) work in administering the recognition procedure. This article analyses the CAC’s interpretive approach in three aspects of the recognition procedure: the ‘majority support likely’ threshold in determining the admissibility of the union’s recognition claim, the contours of the bargaining unit, and deciding whether to order a ballot in situations where the union already has majority membership amongst the workers in the bargaining unit. In each of these contexts, the article concludes that the CAC is resolving ongoing interpretive disputes in a manner that is sensitive to the underlying political values at stake.
Industrial Law Journal – Oxford University Press
Published: Sep 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.