Perspectives on Degas. Edited by Kathryn Brown

Perspectives on Degas. Edited by Kathryn Brown This volume of a dozen essays on Edgar Degas is a welcome addition to the extensive literature on this major — and still perplexing, even contested — artist. It follows two previous collections of papers on his work: Degas inédit (ed. by Henri Loyrette (Paris: Documentation française, 1989)) and Dealing with Degas: Representations of Women and the Politics of Vision (ed. by Richard Kendall and Griselda Pollock (New York: Universe, 1991)). These were published a generation ago, both following exhibitions dedicated to the artist, and were based on contributions to the linked conferences. By contrast, the present volume is free-standing, the essays drawn from the ambient world of scholarship. As such, it is a good gauge of how Degas scholarship stands today. The essays include some very interesting material. Patricia Failing scientifically explores the materials Degas used for his sculpture, a diagrammatic cross-section of the Petite Danseuse de quatorze ans (1880–81, cast c. 1922) showing rope and paintbrushes as well as the more conventional wire and wax, thus revealing his extraordinary improvisation and lack of professionalism. Anna Gruetzner Robins writes revealingly on Walter Sickert’s appreciation of Degas’s experimental attitude to draughtsmanship. Marilyn Brown probes Degas’s attitudes to race via the mixed-race circus performer Miss Lala. Both Anthea Callen, in a detailed and heavily gendered account of a Draner caricature from the 1879 Impressionist exhibition, and Kathryn Brown, in a close account of the roughly contemporaneous Famille Cardinal monotypes, deal with Degas’s engagement with, or manipulation of, the tropes of the illustrated press. As a whole, this volume — inevitably and necessarily — shows the preoccupations of many current Degas scholars. A good deal of it seems insistently cross-referential, going over past literature and debates. Some of the essays have extensive layers that summarize published arguments, analysing and critiquing their positions. For example, Ruth Iskin presents an illuminating account of Mary Cassatt’s significant role as a collector seeking to build up public collections in the United States, but this is prefaced by an extended assessment of the previous literature on the relationship between Degas and Cassatt. Other essays are frankly self-referential, going over the author’s own previous writing. And there is the current tendency to introduce apparently alien theory to works of art. Thus, Marni Reva Kessler complicates a lively reading of the early portrait of the Princesse de Metternich by citing Gilles Deleuze on rhizomes, rather than simply seeing the rapidly improvised background pattern as suggesting wallpaper in front of which the figure is moving. Over-ritualized attention to the current preoccupations of academic practice can be engaging and certainly sets the contemporary art-historical tone. It does, however, draw us away from historical actuality. Several authors speculate on Degas’s sexuality and attitude to women, ignoring the rather conclusive letter published by Loyrette three decades ago, in which the artist wrote to a friend in 1889 instructing him to go to a brothel Degas frequented to buy prophylactics to prepare them for a trip to Spain. This collection provides an enriching set of interpretative arguments, but perhaps the next volume of essays on Degas will bring us back more closely to the artist and his work. © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for French Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png French Studies Oxford University Press

Perspectives on Degas. Edited by Kathryn Brown

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/perspectives-on-degas-edited-by-kathryn-brown-XAeNYbdOlF
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for French Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
ISSN
0016-1128
eISSN
1468-2931
D.O.I.
10.1093/fs/kny226
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This volume of a dozen essays on Edgar Degas is a welcome addition to the extensive literature on this major — and still perplexing, even contested — artist. It follows two previous collections of papers on his work: Degas inédit (ed. by Henri Loyrette (Paris: Documentation française, 1989)) and Dealing with Degas: Representations of Women and the Politics of Vision (ed. by Richard Kendall and Griselda Pollock (New York: Universe, 1991)). These were published a generation ago, both following exhibitions dedicated to the artist, and were based on contributions to the linked conferences. By contrast, the present volume is free-standing, the essays drawn from the ambient world of scholarship. As such, it is a good gauge of how Degas scholarship stands today. The essays include some very interesting material. Patricia Failing scientifically explores the materials Degas used for his sculpture, a diagrammatic cross-section of the Petite Danseuse de quatorze ans (1880–81, cast c. 1922) showing rope and paintbrushes as well as the more conventional wire and wax, thus revealing his extraordinary improvisation and lack of professionalism. Anna Gruetzner Robins writes revealingly on Walter Sickert’s appreciation of Degas’s experimental attitude to draughtsmanship. Marilyn Brown probes Degas’s attitudes to race via the mixed-race circus performer Miss Lala. Both Anthea Callen, in a detailed and heavily gendered account of a Draner caricature from the 1879 Impressionist exhibition, and Kathryn Brown, in a close account of the roughly contemporaneous Famille Cardinal monotypes, deal with Degas’s engagement with, or manipulation of, the tropes of the illustrated press. As a whole, this volume — inevitably and necessarily — shows the preoccupations of many current Degas scholars. A good deal of it seems insistently cross-referential, going over past literature and debates. Some of the essays have extensive layers that summarize published arguments, analysing and critiquing their positions. For example, Ruth Iskin presents an illuminating account of Mary Cassatt’s significant role as a collector seeking to build up public collections in the United States, but this is prefaced by an extended assessment of the previous literature on the relationship between Degas and Cassatt. Other essays are frankly self-referential, going over the author’s own previous writing. And there is the current tendency to introduce apparently alien theory to works of art. Thus, Marni Reva Kessler complicates a lively reading of the early portrait of the Princesse de Metternich by citing Gilles Deleuze on rhizomes, rather than simply seeing the rapidly improvised background pattern as suggesting wallpaper in front of which the figure is moving. Over-ritualized attention to the current preoccupations of academic practice can be engaging and certainly sets the contemporary art-historical tone. It does, however, draw us away from historical actuality. Several authors speculate on Degas’s sexuality and attitude to women, ignoring the rather conclusive letter published by Loyrette three decades ago, in which the artist wrote to a friend in 1889 instructing him to go to a brothel Degas frequented to buy prophylactics to prepare them for a trip to Spain. This collection provides an enriching set of interpretative arguments, but perhaps the next volume of essays on Degas will bring us back more closely to the artist and his work. © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for French Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Journal

French StudiesOxford University Press

Published: Oct 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off