Over twenty years have passed since Nelson and Winter put the concept of routinesfirmly at the center of the analysis of organizational and economic change. A growingnumber of researchers have followed their example since. However, researchers have notalways had the same idea of what routines are and what effect they have on organizations.Over time, this has left the literature on routines riddled with ambiguities. Forresearchers who want to apply the concept of routines in their research, it is not easyto get an overview of the current thinking about routines and their effects. This articleoffers a systematic review of the literature that has contributed to the theoreticaldevelopment of the concept of routines, and of the empirical literature that has appliedthe concept of routines.
Industrial and Corporate Change – Oxford University Press
Published: Aug 1, 2004
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera