Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Raghunathan (2006)
Combining information from multiple surveys for assessing health disparitiesAllgemeines Statistisches Archiv, 90
N. Schenker, T. Raghunathan (2007)
Combining information from multiple surveys to enhance estimation of measures of healthStatistics in Medicine, 26
X. Meng, D. Rubin (1992)
Performing likelihood ratio tests with multiply-imputed data setsBiometrika, 79
J. Barnard, D. Rubin (1999)
Small-sample degrees of freedom with multiple imputationBiometrika, 86
D. Brownstone, Robert Valletta (1996)
Modeling Earnings Measurement Error: A Multiple Imputation ApproachThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 78
R. Yucel, A. Zaslavsky (2005)
Imputation of Binary Treatment Variables With Measurement Error in Administrative DataJournal of the American Statistical Association, 100
D. Rubin (2003)
Nested multiple imputation of NMES via partially incompatible MCMCStatistica Neerlandica, 57
K. Li, X. Meng, T. Raghunathan, D. Rubin (1991)
Significance levels from repeated p-values with multiply imputed dataStatistica Sinica, 1
T. Raghunathan, D. Siscovick (1998)
Combining exposure information from various sources in an analysis of a case-control studyJournal of The Royal Statistical Society Series D-the Statistician, 47
D. Rubin (1989)
Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys
J. Abowd, Simon Woodcock
Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Technical paper No . TP-2004-04 Multiply-Imputing Confidential Characteristics and File Links in Longitudinal Linked Data
O. Harel, Xiao-Hua Zhou (2006)
Multiple imputation for correcting verification biasStatistics in Medicine, 25
Jerome Reiter (2005)
Significance tests for multi-component estimands from multiply imputed, synthetic microdataJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 131
C. Clogg, D. Rubin, N. Schenker, B. Schultz, L. Weidman (1991)
Multiple Imputation of Industry and Occupation Codes in Census Public-use Samples Using Bayesian Logistic RegressionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 86
N. Schenker, J. Parker (2003)
From single‐race reporting to multiple‐race reporting: using imputation methods to bridge the transitionStatistics in Medicine, 22
B. Ghosh-Dastidar, J. Schafer (2003)
Multiple Edit/Multiple Imputation for Multivariate Continuous DataJournal of the American Statistical Association, 98
Susanne Rässler (2003)
A Non‐Iterative Bayesian Approach to Statistical MatchingStatistica Neerlandica, 57
N. Schenker (2003)
Assessing Variability Due to Race BridgingJournal of the American Statistical Association, 98
Jerome Reiter, T. Raghunathan (2007)
The Multiple Adaptations of Multiple ImputationJournal of the American Statistical Association, 102
Gabriele Durrant, C. Skinner (2006)
Using missing data methods to correct for measurement error in a distribution function
Jerome Reiter (2007)
Small-sample degrees of freedom for multi-component significance tests with multiple imputation for missing dataBiometrika, 94
K. Li, T. Raghunathan, D. Rubin (1991)
Large-sample significance levels from multiply imputed data using moment-based statistics and an F reference distributionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 86
S. Cole, H. Chu, S. Greenland (2006)
Multiple-imputation for measurement-error correction.International journal of epidemiology, 35 4
Jerome Reiter (2005)
Using CART to generate partially synthetic public use microdataJournal of Official Statistics, 21
When some of the records used to estimate the imputation models in multiple imputation are not used or available for analysis, the usual multiple imputation variance estimator has positive bias. We present an alternative approach that enables unbiased estimation of variances and, hence, calibrated inferences in such contexts. First, using all records, the imputer samples m values of the parameters of the imputation model. Second, for each parameter draw, the imputer simulates the missing values for all records n times. From these mn completed datasets, the imputer can analyse or disseminate the appropriate subset of records. We develop methods for interval estimation and significance testing for this approach. Methods are presented in the context of multiple imputation for measurement error.
Biometrika – Oxford University Press
Published: Dec 3, 2008
Keywords: Some key words Combining data Confidentiality Measurement error Missing data Multiple imputation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.