Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. George (1991)
Forceful Persuasion: Coercive Diplomacy as an Alternative to War
R. Art, P. Cronin (2003)
The United States and Coercive DiplomacyNaval War College Review, 57
R. Pape (1997)
Why Economic Sanctions Do Not WorkInternational Security, 22
Stephen Schlesinger, S. Kinzer (1999)
Bitter fruit : the story of the American coup in Guatemala
G. Hufbauer (1985)
Economic Sanctions Reconsidered
David Armstrong (1993)
Revolution and World Order
Michael Manley (1982)
Jamaica: Struggle in the Periphery
N. Bisley (2003)
Counter-revolution, order and international politicsReview of International Studies, 30
Richard Gott (2004)
Cuba: A New History
W. Edel (1991)
Diplomatic History State Department StylePolitical Science Quarterly, 106
J. Gerring (2006)
Case Study Research: Principles and Practices
L. Bethell (1993)
Cuba: A Short History
Lester Langley (1977)
The hovering giant : U.S. responses to revolutionary change in Latin AmericaAmericas, 57
R. Ramsey, E. Guevara, M. Waters (1996)
The Bolivian Diary of Ernesto Che Guevara.@@@Episodes of the Cuban Revolutionary War, 1956-58.Americas, 76
D. Kahneman, A. Tversky (1979)
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 47
Peter Kornbluh (2003)
The Pinochet File: A Declassified Dossier on Atrocity and Accountability
William Stodden (2012)
The foreign policy of destabilization: The USA in Latin America, 1947-1989
S. Streeter (2000)
Interpreting the 1954 U.S. Intervention in Guatemala: Realist, Revisionist, and Postrevisionist Perspectives.The History Teacher, 34
Marifeli Pérez-Stable (1993)
The Cuban Revolution : Origins, Course, and Legacy
P. Mars (1998)
Ideology and Change: The Transformation of the Caribbean Left
J. Dulles (1970)
Unrest in Brazil: Political-Military Crises 1955-1964
A. Rotter, M. Morley (1988)
United States Capitalism and the Containment of Cuba@@@Imperial State and Revolution: The United States and Cuba, 1952-1986.Reviews in American History, 16
Karen Feste (2003)
Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. By Kenneth A. Schultz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 301p. $65.00 cloth, $23.00 paperPerspectives on Politics, 1
Stephen Rabe (2008)
U.S. Presidents and Latin American Interventions: Pursuing Regime Change in the Cold War
Stephen Krasner (1978)
Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy
H. Erisman (1985)
Cuba's International Relations: The Anatomy Of A Nationalistic Foreign Policy
Piero Gleijeses (1989)
Eisenhower and Latin America: The Foreign Policy of AnticommunismAmericas, 69
N. Black, H. Kissinger (1979)
White House YearsInternational Journal, 35
C. Mcalmont (2006)
US Intervention in British Guiana: A Cold War StoryThe Journal of Caribbean history, 40
Kenneth Schultz (2001)
Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy
J. Franklin (2002)
Cuba and the United States: A Chronological History
Gil Merom (1990)
Democracy, Dependency, and Destabilization: The Shaking of Allende's RegimePolitical Science Quarterly, 105
N. Marinov (2005)
Do Economic Sanctions Destabilize Country LeadersAmerican Journal of Political Science, 49
Robert Schulzinger, Bruce Calder, Stephen Schlesinger, S. Kinzer, R. Immerman (1983)
The Colossus at Work@@@The Impact of Intervention: The Dominican Republic During the U.S. Occupation of 1916-1924.@@@Bitter Fruit: The Untold Story of the American Coup in Guatemala.@@@The CIA in Guatemala: The Foreign Policy of Intervention.Reviews in American History, 12
J. Frankel, Kenneth Waltz (1979)
Theory of International PoliticsInternational Journal, 35
H. Thomas (1971)
Cuba, or, The pursuit of freedom
Stephen Rabe (2005)
U.S. Intervention in British Guiana: A Cold War Story
In this article, we test one explanation of the causes of adoption of destabilization as a foreign policy. Destabilization, a risky policy which targets the political leadership of another sovereign state, is a widely-used foreign policy practice. But under-conceptualization, specifically around the causes of destabilization, has thus far limited its use in scholarly analysis of foreign policy. This paper aims to remedy that deficiency. Building on Taliaferro's (2004) balance-of-risk theory, we examine the rapid decay and adoption of destabilization in relations between the US and Cuba as a critical empirical test of this theory. We argue that the risky decision to adopt destabilization is the result of perceived crisis of security, economic and ideological interests. Our findings have implications for other scenarios and times, because they provide a better understanding of destabilization as a practice of governments against one another.
Foreign Policy Analysis – Oxford University Press
Published: Jan 1, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.