Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

HIDDEN NEGATIVISM: EVALUATION OF SWEDISH PARTIES AND THEIR LEADERS UNDER DIFFERENT SURVEY METHODS

HIDDEN NEGATIVISM: EVALUATION OF SWEDISH PARTIES AND THEIR LEADERS UNDER DIFFERENT SURVEY METHODS AbstractA comparison was made of how Swedish adults evaluated political parties and the party leaders under three different survey methods: in-person interviews, telephone interviews, and mailed questionnaires. Both the party leaders and the parties were evaluated more negatively by people responding on the mailed questionnaires. Telephone and in-person interviewees did not differ significantly. The evidence did not indicate that the mailed questionnaire respondents answered more carelessly or in a less coherent manner. The level of evaluation was affected by the method, but the structure of the answers was not. The results imply that most estimates of popular support for political leaders underestimate the level of disapproval. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Public Opinion Research Oxford University Press

HIDDEN NEGATIVISM: EVALUATION OF SWEDISH PARTIES AND THEIR LEADERS UNDER DIFFERENT SURVEY METHODS

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/hidden-negativism-evaluation-of-swedish-parties-and-their-leaders-1E2IBbX0YZ

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© World Association for Public Opinion Research
ISSN
0954-2892
eISSN
1471-6909
DOI
10.1093/ijpor/5.3.265
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractA comparison was made of how Swedish adults evaluated political parties and the party leaders under three different survey methods: in-person interviews, telephone interviews, and mailed questionnaires. Both the party leaders and the parties were evaluated more negatively by people responding on the mailed questionnaires. Telephone and in-person interviewees did not differ significantly. The evidence did not indicate that the mailed questionnaire respondents answered more carelessly or in a less coherent manner. The level of evaluation was affected by the method, but the structure of the answers was not. The results imply that most estimates of popular support for political leaders underestimate the level of disapproval.

Journal

International Journal of Public Opinion ResearchOxford University Press

Published: Oct 1, 1993

There are no references for this article.