Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Book Reviews Gert BrüGGemeier , t ort Lwa in the e uropean u nion (Kluwer, 2015)† Reviewed by Mauro Bussani* An everyday reader might reasonably assume that a volume entitled Tort Law in the European Union would explore the tort rules that apply under EU law or in the different European member states. But those familiar with the EU legal structure will be per- plexed—EU tort law, as Gert Brüggemeier puts it, “does not exist.” Let me then proceed step by step. There are many ways of nar- rating EU history. Thus far, the prevailing story has been told by con- t ort Lwa in the e uropean u nion stitutional and public international lawyers. In their view, the EU is both the protagonist and the result of a revolutionary shift from a legal order based on an interstate compact that is binding on sover- eign states to one based on a constitutional, quasi-federal charter. The shift towards a quasi-federal union, the prevailing view holds, was made possible by landmark decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) establishing the doctrines of direct effect and the supremacy of EU law, which were then formalized in the
American Journal of Comparative Law – Oxford University Press
Published: Dec 1, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.