Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/oxford-university-press/enhancing-citizen-engagement-in-cancer-screening-through-deliberative-o3pyENnUvh
References (118)
-
R. Hoffman, Carmen Lewis, Michael Pignone, M. Couper, M. Barry, J. Elmore, C. Levin, John Hoewyk, B. Zikmund‐Fisher (2010)
Decision-Making Processes for Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Screening: The DECISIONS SurveyMedical Decision Making, 30
-
K. Flitcroft, J. Gillespie, G. Salkeld, S. Carter, L. Trevena (2011)
Getting evidence into policy: The need for deliberative strategies?Social science & medicine, 72 7
-
L. Parkin, C. Paul (2009)
Public good, personal privacy: a citizens' deliberation about using medical information for pharmacoepidemiological researchJournal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 65
-
P. Gøtzsche, O. Hartling, M. Nielsen, J. Brodersen, K. Jørgensen (2009)
Breast screening: the facts—or maybe notBMJ : British Medical Journal, 338
-
S. Goold, Michael Neblo, Scott Kim, R. Vries, G. Rowe, P. Muhlberger (2012)
What is good public deliberation?The Hastings Center report, 42 2
-
Jill Sage (2014)
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons, 99 10
-
E. Largent, S. Pearson (2012)
Which orphans will find a home? The rule of rescue in resource allocation for rare diseases.The Hastings Center report, 42 1
-
K. McPherson (2010)
Screening for breast cancer—balancing the debateBMJ : British Medical Journal, 340
-
M. Kalager, H. Adami, M. Bretthauer, R. Tamimi (2012)
Overdiagnosis of Invasive Breast Cancer Due to Mammography Screening: Results From the Norwegian Screening ProgramAnnals of Internal Medicine, 156
-
J. Abelson, M. Giacomini, P. Lehoux, F. Gauvin (2007)
Bringing 'the public' into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice.Health policy, 82 1
-
K. O’Doherty, F. Gauvin, C. Grogan, W. Friedman (2012)
Implementing a public deliberative forum.The Hastings Center report, 42 2
-
T. Stephens (2011)
Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation StatementYearbook of Diagnostic Radiology, 2011
-
(2012)
Endless screenings don't bring everlasting health -
Russell Harris (2011)
Overview of screening: where we are and where we may be headed.Epidemiologic reviews, 33
-
E. Willis (1997)
The Prostatic Imperative and the Social Relations of Medical TechnologyInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 13
-
O. Wegwarth, Lisa Schwartz, S. Woloshin, W. Gaissmaier, G. Gigerenzer (2012)
Do Physicians Understand Cancer Screening Statistics? A National Survey of Primary Care Physicians in the United StatesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 156
-
P. Gøtzsche (2012)
Mammography screening: truth, lies, and controversyThe Lancet, 380
-
Crystale Cooper, T. Merritt, Louie Ross, Lisa John, C. Jorgensen (2004)
To screen or not to screen, when clinical guidelines disagree: primary care physicians' use of the PSA test.Preventive medicine, 38 2
-
F. Schröder, J. Hugosson, M. Roobol, T. Tammela, S. Ciatto, V. Nelen, M. Kwiatkowski, M. Luján, H. Lilja, M. Zappa, L. Denis, F. Recker, Á. Páez, L. Määttänen, C. Bangma, G. Aus, S. Carlsson, A. Villers, X. Rébillard, T. Kwast, P. Kujala, B. Blijenberg, U. Stenman, A. Huber, K. Taari, M. Hakama, S. Moss, H. Koning, A. Auvinen (2012)
Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up.The New England journal of medicine, 366 11
-
R. Ashcroft (2008)
Fair Process and the Redundancy of Bioethics: A PolemicPublic Health Ethics, 1
-
L. Dans, M. Silvestre, A. Dans (2011)
Trade-off between benefit and harm is crucial in health screening recommendations. Part I: general principles.Journal of clinical epidemiology, 64 3
-
K. Jacobsen, M. Euler-Chelpin (2012)
Performance indicators for participation in organized mammography screening.Journal of public health, 34 2
-
A. Miller (2008)
Screening: evidence and practiceBulletin of The World Health Organization, 86
-
J. Abelson, Mark Warren, P. Forest (2012)
The future of public deliberation on health issues.The Hastings Center report, 42 2
-
R. Goodin, J. Dryzek (2006)
Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-PublicsPolitics & Society, 34
-
C. Kuhl, S. Schrading, H. Bieling, E. Wardelmann, C. Leutner, R. Koenig, W. Kuhn, H. Schild (2007)
MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational studyThe Lancet, 370
-
(2012)
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. About NICE: Citizens Council -
L. Irwig, P. Glasziou (2000)
Informed consent for screening by community sampling.Effective clinical practice : ECP, 3 1
-
M. Thorat, H. Thornton (2008)
MRI breast screeningThe Lancet, 371
-
Virginia Braun, N. Gavey (1999)
'With the best of reasons': cervical cancer prevention policy and the suppression of sexual risk factor information.Social science & medicine, 48 10
-
G. Gigerenzer, J. Mata, Ronald Frank (2009)
Public Knowledge of Benefits of Breast and Prostate Cancer Screening in EuropeJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 101
-
Lisa Schwartz, S. Woloshin, F. Fowler, H. Welch (2004)
Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States.JAMA, 291 1
-
V. Entwistle, S. Carter, L. Trevena, K. Flitcroft, L. Irwig, K. McCaffery, G. Salkeld (2008)
Communicating about screeningBMJ : British Medical Journal, 337
-
A. Brett, R. Ablin (2011)
Prostate-cancer screening--what the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force left out.The New England journal of medicine, 365 21
-
(2009)
Get a mammogram No don't. Repeat. New York Times -
T. Connolly, J. Reb (2005)
Regret in cancer-related decisions.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 24 4S
-
S. Mayor (2010)
Critics attack new NHS breast screening leaflet for failing to address harmsBMJ : British Medical Journal, 341
-
Marshall Kg (1996)
Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 4. The ethics of informed consent for preventive screening programs.Canadian Medical Association Journal, 155
-
L. Irwig, K. McCaffery, G. Salkeld, P. Bossuyt (2006)
Informed choice for screening: implications for evaluationBMJ : British Medical Journal, 332
-
A. Faulkner (2012)
Resisting the screening imperative: patienthood, populations and politics in prostate cancer detection technologies for the UK.Sociology of health & illness, 34 2
-
R. Jepson, J. Hewison, Andrew Thompson, D. Weller (2007)
Patient perspectives on information and choice in cancer screening: a qualitative study in the UK.Social science & medicine, 65 5
-
A. Krist, S. Woolf, Robert Johnson, J. Kerns (2007)
Patient Education on Prostate Cancer Screening and Involvement in Decision MakingThe Annals of Family Medicine, 5
-
D. Roder, I. Olver (2011)
Do the benefits of screening mammography outweigh the harms of overdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment?Medical Journal of Australia, 196
-
S. Woloshin, Lisa Schwartz (2010)
The benefits and harms of mammography screening: understanding the trade-offs.JAMA, 303 2
-
(2012)
PSA Needs Order -
A. Raffle (2001)
Information about screening – is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice?Health Expectations, 4
-
E. Blacksher, Alice Diebel, P. Forest, S. Goold, J. Abelson (2012)
What is public deliberation?The Hastings Center report, 42 2
-
R. Thorner, Q. Remein (1961)
Principles and Procedures in the Evaluation of Screening for Disease. -
Scan Directory . com . Why Get a Scan ? -
C. Breitkopf, Heidi Pearson, D. Breitkopf (2005)
Poor knowledge regarding the Pap test among low-income women undergoing routine screening.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 37 2
-
F. Schröder (2011)
Stratifying risk--the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and prostate-cancer screening.The New England journal of medicine, 365 21
-
V. Moyer (2012)
Screening for Cervical Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation StatementAnnals of Internal Medicine, 156
-
Programme Appraisal Criteria: Criteria for Appraising the Viability, Effectiveness and Appropriateness of a Screening Programme -
J. Selby, Anne Beal, L. Frank (2012)
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda.JAMA, 307 15
-
John Gastil, L. Black, E. Deess, Jay Leighter (2008)
From Group Member to Democratic Citizen: How Deliberating with Fellow Jurors Reshapes Civic AttitudesHuman Communication Research, 34
-
J. Tanne (2009)
New recommendations on mammography and cervical cancer screening disrupt US health reform debateBMJ : British Medical Journal, 339
-
Peter Schwartz, E. Meslin (2008)
The Ethics of Information: Absolute Risk Reduction and Patient Understanding of ScreeningJournal of General Internal Medicine, 23
-
N. Armstrong, H. Eborall (2012)
The sociology of medical screening: past, present and future.Sociology of health & illness, 34 2
-
S. Woolf, A. Krist (2005)
The liability of giving patients a choice: shared decision making and prostate cancer.American family physician, 71 10
-
G. Rose, D. Barker (1978)
Epidemiology for the uninitiated. Screening.British Medical Journal, 2
-
Judy Gregory, Janette Hartz-Karp, Rebecca Watson (2008)
Using deliberative techniques to engage the community in policy developmentAustralia and New Zealand Health Policy, 5
-
I. Evans, H. Thornton, I. Chalmers, P. Glasziou (2011)
Earlier is not necessarily better -
S. Latham (2012)
Whither the Affordable Care Act?The Hastings Center report, 42 3
-
Y. Bombard, J. Abelson, D. Simeonov, F. Gauvin (2011)
Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: A participatory approach.Social science & medicine, 73 1
-
P. Slovic (1999)
Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk‐Assessment BattlefieldRisk Analysis, 19
-
(2011)
Breast screening should be scrapped. Evidence points to the fact that cancer mortality rates are dropping due to improved treatment, not mammograms . The Guardian -
C. Kuhl, H. Bieling, E. Wardelmann, W. Kuhn, H. Schild (2008)
MRI breast screening – Authors' replyThe Lancet, 371
-
V. Ravitsky (2012)
Conceived and deceived: the medical interests of donor-conceived individuals.The Hastings Center report, 42 1
-
T. Newman, M. Kohn (2009)
Evidence-Based Diagnosis: Screening tests -
M. Silvestre, L. Dans, A. Dans (2011)
Trade-off between benefit and harm is crucial in health screening recommendations. Part II: evidence summaries.Journal of clinical epidemiology, 64 3
-
T. Bodenheimer (1997)
The Oregon Health Plan--lessons for the nation. First of two parts.The New England journal of medicine, 337 9
-
S. Chapman, A. Barratt, M. Stockler (2010)
Let sleeping dogs lie?: What men should know before getting tested for prostate cancer -
S. Thier (1977)
Breast cancer screening: a view from outside the controversy.The New England journal of medicine, 297 19
-
A. Sheedy, Mary MacKinnon, S. Pitre, J. Watling, C. Networks (2008)
Handbook on Citizen Engagement: Beyond Consultation -
K. Marshall (1996)
Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 4. The ethics of informed consent for preventive screening programs.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 155 4
-
N. Juth, C. Munthe (2011)
The Ethics of Screening in Health Care and Medicine: Serving Society or Serving the Patient? -
H. Welch, Lisa Schwartz, S. Woloshin (2006)
Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: 1 in 4 cancers detected by mammography are pseudocancersBMJ : British Medical Journal, 332
-
M. Marmot, D. Altman, D. Cameron, J. Dewar, S. Thompson, M. Wilcox, S. IndependentUkPanelBreastCanc (2013)
The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent reviewBritish Journal of Cancer, 108
-
M. Javitt, R. Hendrick (2010)
Revealing Oz behind the curtain: USPSTF screening mammography guidelines and the hot air balloon.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 194 2
-
S. Bhimji, J. Cole (2015)
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) -
M. McNaughton-Collins, M. Barry (2011)
One man at a time--resolving the PSA controversy.The New England journal of medicine, 365 21
-
A. Howson (1999)
Cervical screening, compliance and moral obligationSociology of Health and Illness, 21
-
David Smith, B. Armstrong (1998)
Prostate‐specific antigen testing in Australia and association with prostate cancer incidence in New South WalesMedical Journal of Australia, 169
-
Ja Wilson, G. Jungner (1968)
Principles and practice of screening for disease -
Andrew Cole (2010)
UK patients are given advice on private screeningBMJ : British Medical Journal, 341
-
T. Newman, M. Kohn (2009)
Evidence-Based Diagnosis: Challenges for evidence-based diagnosis -
Download Ebook (2013)
Social Justice : The Moral Foundations of Public Health and Health Policy -
(2012)
Why Get a Scan? http://www.scandirectory.com/content/why_get_a_body_scan .asp -
S. Solomon, J. Abelson (2012)
Why and when should we use public deliberation?The Hastings Center report, 42 2
-
M. Sanford (2004)
Breast Cancer Awareness Month -
T. Bodenheimer (1997)
The Oregon Health Plan--lessons for the nation. Second of two parts.The New England journal of medicine, 337 10
-
C. Riva, J. Biollaz, P. Foucras, B. Junod, P. Nicot, J. Spinosa (2012)
Effect of population-based screening on breast cancer mortalityThe Lancet, 379
-
N. Baxter, K. Brasel, C. Brown, P. Chaudhury, C. Divino, E. Dixon, G. Fitzgerald, S. Hameed, H. Henteleff, T. Hughes, L. Kao, A. Kirkpatrick, S. Latosinsky, T. Mastracci, R. McLeod, A. Morris, T. Pawlik, L. Temple, M. McKenzie (2013)
US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Task Force recommendation statementJournal of The American College of Surgeons, 216
-
J. Elmore, S. Fletcher (2012)
Overdiagnosis in Breast Cancer Screening: Time to Tackle an Underappreciated HarmAnnals of Internal Medicine, 156
-
(2011)
Screening to Improve Health in New Zealand: Criteria to Assess Screening Programmes -
(2012)
Citizens Jury Process. http://www.jefferson-center -
W. Catalona, A. D'Amico, William Fitzgibbons, O. Kosoko-Lasaki, Stephen Leslie, H. Lynch, J. Moul, M. Rendell, P. Walsh (2012)
What the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Missed in Its Prostate Cancer Screening RecommendationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 157
-
M. Stefanek (2011)
Uninformed compliance or informed choice? A needed shift in our approach to cancer screening.Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 103 24
-
A. Johnson (2007)
Testing Treatments: Better Research for Better HealthcareCanadian Journal of Public Health-revue Canadienne De Sante Publique, 98
-
Len Lichtenfeld (2011)
Overdiagnosed: Making people sick in the pursuit of healthJournal of Clinical Investigation, 121
-
Leonard Berlin (2011)
Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick in Pursuit of HealthJAMA, 305
-
D. Blake, Brittany Weber, K. Fletcher (2003)
Adolescent and young adult women's misunderstanding of the term Pap smear.Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 158 10
-
Michael Marmot, Douglas Altman, David Cameron, John Dewar, Simon Thompson, M. Wilcox (2012)
The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent reviewThe Lancet, 380
-
R. Ablin, A. Loba (2010)
The Great Prostate Mistake -
J. Chamova, J. Lange (2013)
European network for health technology assessment – EUnetHTAMedical Writing, 22
-
(2012)
Opposing views: do the benefits of screening mammography outweigh the harms: yes -
G. Yamey, M. Wilkes (2002)
The PSA stormBMJ : British Medical Journal, 324
-
C. Paul, Rachel Nicholls, P. Priest, R. Mcgee (2008)
Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: the role of citizens' deliberation.Health policy, 85 3
-
W. Levinson, A. Kao, A. Kuby, R. Thisted (2005)
Not all patients want to participate in decision makingJournal of General Internal Medicine, 20
-
Graham Smith, C. Wales (1999)
The theory and practice of citizens' juriesPolicy and Politics, 27
-
R. Ablin, M. Haythorn (2009)
Screening for prostate cancer: Controversy? What controversy?Current Oncology, 16
-
Carolyn Lukensmeyer, Lars Torres (2006)
Public Deliberation: A Manager's Guide to Citizen Engagement -
Virginia Chang (2008)
Affect and heart diseaseBMJ : British Medical Journal, 337
-
S. Fletcher (2011)
Breast cancer screening: a 35-year perspective.Epidemiologic reviews, 33
-
S. McIver (1998)
Healthy debate? : an independent evaluation of citizens' juries in health settings -
P. Gøtzsche, K. Jørgensen (2013)
Screening for breast cancer with mammography.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 6
-
A. Velden, T. Wobbes (2007)
Should we undertake an MRI breast screening trial?The Lancet, 370
-
N. Brewer, T. Salz, Sarah Lillie (2007)
Systematic Review: The Long-Term Effects of False-Positive MammogramsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 146
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Copyright
- © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: [email protected].
- Subject
- Commentary
- ISSN
- 0027-8874
- eISSN
- 1460-2105
- DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/djs649
- pmid
- 23378639
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Cancer screening is widely practiced and participation is promoted by various social, technical, and commercial drivers, but there are growing concerns about the emerging harms, risks, and costs of cancer screening. Deliberative democracy methods engage citizens in dialogue on substantial and complex problems: especially when evidence and values are important and people need time to understand and consider the relevant issues. Information derived from such deliberations can provide important guidance to cancer screening policies: citizens’ values are made explicit, revealing what really matters to people and why. Policy makers can see what informed, rather than uninformed, citizens would decide on the provision of services and information on cancer screening. Caveats can be elicited to guide changes to existing policies and practices. Policies that take account of citizens’ opinions through a deliberative democracy process can be considered more legitimate, justifiable, and feasible than those that don’t.
Journal
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute – Oxford University Press
Published: Mar 20, 2013