Corrigendum. The vaginal microbiome as a predictor for outcome of in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective study

Corrigendum. The vaginal microbiome as a predictor for outcome of in vitro fertilization with or... Hum Reprod 2018;33:2002-2009 The authors of the above article would like to apologise for errors in Figure 3 of their article. An old version of the figure file image was uploaded by the authors, with sub-sections A, B, C and D rearranged. The correct version of Figure 3 is included overpage. The electronic version of this article has been updated at https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez065. The authors would like to assure readers that this does not affect any content of the article. Figure 3 Open in new tabDownload slide The role of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus iners in predicting pregnancy outcome. Relative rates of L. crispatus versus L. iners for each patient. Each circle represents a patient, the colour of the dot shows pregnancy outcome (green – pregnant, red – not pregnant). A) Patients with an unfavourable profile (34 of 192 women) are depicted as black crosses, they are removed from the dataset in figures B-D. B) Of the remaining 158 women, 63 have a relative abundance of L. crispatus ≥ 60%. The pregnancy rate in this group is 15/63=24%. C) Women with a relative abundance of L. iners ≥ 60% show a pregnancy rate of 19/38=50%. D) When taking into account L. crispatus abundance alone, the group of women with a L. crispatus abundance ≤ 60% have a pregnancy rate of 50/95=53%. Figure 3 Open in new tabDownload slide The role of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus iners in predicting pregnancy outcome. Relative rates of L. crispatus versus L. iners for each patient. Each circle represents a patient, the colour of the dot shows pregnancy outcome (green – pregnant, red – not pregnant). A) Patients with an unfavourable profile (34 of 192 women) are depicted as black crosses, they are removed from the dataset in figures B-D. B) Of the remaining 158 women, 63 have a relative abundance of L. crispatus ≥ 60%. The pregnancy rate in this group is 15/63=24%. C) Women with a relative abundance of L. iners ≥ 60% show a pregnancy rate of 19/38=50%. D) When taking into account L. crispatus abundance alone, the group of women with a L. crispatus abundance ≤ 60% have a pregnancy rate of 50/95=53%. © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Human Reproduction Oxford University Press

Corrigendum. The vaginal microbiome as a predictor for outcome of in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective study

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/corrigendum-the-vaginal-microbiome-as-a-predictor-for-outcome-of-in-U1tCsSOqM2
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.
ISSN
0268-1161
eISSN
1460-2350
DOI
10.1093/humrep/dez127
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Hum Reprod 2018;33:2002-2009 The authors of the above article would like to apologise for errors in Figure 3 of their article. An old version of the figure file image was uploaded by the authors, with sub-sections A, B, C and D rearranged. The correct version of Figure 3 is included overpage. The electronic version of this article has been updated at https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez065. The authors would like to assure readers that this does not affect any content of the article. Figure 3 Open in new tabDownload slide The role of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus iners in predicting pregnancy outcome. Relative rates of L. crispatus versus L. iners for each patient. Each circle represents a patient, the colour of the dot shows pregnancy outcome (green – pregnant, red – not pregnant). A) Patients with an unfavourable profile (34 of 192 women) are depicted as black crosses, they are removed from the dataset in figures B-D. B) Of the remaining 158 women, 63 have a relative abundance of L. crispatus ≥ 60%. The pregnancy rate in this group is 15/63=24%. C) Women with a relative abundance of L. iners ≥ 60% show a pregnancy rate of 19/38=50%. D) When taking into account L. crispatus abundance alone, the group of women with a L. crispatus abundance ≤ 60% have a pregnancy rate of 50/95=53%. Figure 3 Open in new tabDownload slide The role of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus iners in predicting pregnancy outcome. Relative rates of L. crispatus versus L. iners for each patient. Each circle represents a patient, the colour of the dot shows pregnancy outcome (green – pregnant, red – not pregnant). A) Patients with an unfavourable profile (34 of 192 women) are depicted as black crosses, they are removed from the dataset in figures B-D. B) Of the remaining 158 women, 63 have a relative abundance of L. crispatus ≥ 60%. The pregnancy rate in this group is 15/63=24%. C) Women with a relative abundance of L. iners ≥ 60% show a pregnancy rate of 19/38=50%. D) When taking into account L. crispatus abundance alone, the group of women with a L. crispatus abundance ≤ 60% have a pregnancy rate of 50/95=53%. © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Journal

Human ReproductionOxford University Press

Published: Oct 2, 2019

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off