Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Hamilton, J. Hunter, F. Boster (1993)
The Elaboration Likelihood Model as a Theory of Attitude Formation: A Mathematical AnalysisCommunication Theory, 3
W. Wood (1982)
Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42
J. Cacioppo, B. Marshall-goodell, L. Tassinary, R. Petty (1992)
Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: Classical conditioning is more effective when prior knowledge about the attitude stimulus is low than highJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28
R. Maccallum, D. Wegener, B. Uchino, L. Fabrigar (1993)
The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis.Psychological bulletin, 114 1
Deborah Maclnnis, C. Moorman, Bernard Jaworski (1991)
Enhancing and Measuring Consumers’ Motivation, Opportunity, and Ability to Process Brand Information from AdsJournal of Marketing, 55
R. Petty, G. Wells, T. Brock (1976)
Distraction Can Enhance or Reduce Yielding to Propaganda: Thought Disruption Versus Effort JustificationJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34
C. Haugtvedt, R. Petty (1992)
Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63
D. Axsom, S. Yates, S. Chaiken (1987)
Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion.Journal of personality and social psychology, 53 1
Petty Petty, Cacioppo Cacioppo (1984a)
The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasionIournal of Personality and Social Psychology., 46
Sears Sears (1988)
Review of Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude changePublic Opinion Quarterly, 52
H. Bless, G. Bohner, N. Schwarz, F. Strack (1990)
Mood and PersuasionPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16
A. Staats, C. Staats (1958)
Attitudes established by classical conditioning.Journal of abnormal psychology, 57 1
James Stiff, F. Boster (1987)
Cognitive processing: Additional thoughts and a reply to Petty, Kasmer, Haugtvedt, and CacioppoCommunication Monographs, 54
R. Baron, D. Kenny (1986)
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of personality and social psychology, 51 6
R. Petty, J. Cacioppo (1990)
Involvement and Persuasion: Tradition Versus IntegrationPsychological Bulletin, 107
Prafkanis Prafkanis (1989)
Advances in social psychology during the postcrisis eraContemporary Psychology, 34
R. Burnkrant, H. Unnava (1989)
Self-ReferencingPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15
S. Ratneshwar, S. Chaiken, S. Swan, Tina Lowrey (1991)
Comprehension's Role in Persuasion: The Case of Its Moderating Effect on the Persuasive Impact of Source CuesJournal of Consumer Research, 18
J. Lydon, M. Zanna, M. Ross (1988)
Bolstering Attitudes by Autobiographical RecallPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14
Paul Miniard, Sunil Bhatla, Kenneth Lord, Peter Dickson, H. Unnava (1991)
Picture-Based Persuasion Processes and the Moderating Role of InvolvementJournal of Consumer Research, 18
Platt Platt (1964)
Strong inferenceScience, 146
D. Macinnis, Bernard Jaworski (1989)
Information Processing from Advertisements: Toward an Integrative FrameworkJournal of Marketing, 53
R. Abelson, James Miller (1967)
Negative persuasion via personal insultJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3
Burnkrant Burnkrant, Unnava Unnava (1989)
Self‐referencing: A strategy for increasing processing of message contentPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15
J. Platt (1964)
Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others.Science, 146 3642
D. Baumrind (1983)
Specious causal attributions in the social sciences: the reformulated stepping-stone theory of heroin use as exemplar.Journal of personality and social psychology, 45 6
W. Wood, Carl Kallgren, Rebecca Preisler (1985)
Access to attitude-relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion: The role of message attributesJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21
Cacioppo Cacioppo, Petty Petty (1979)
Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive responses, recall, and persuasionJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37
M. Allen, James Stiff (1989)
Testing three models for the sleeper effectWestern Journal of Speech Communication, 53
R. Petty, J. Cacioppo (1979)
Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37
S. Chaiken, M. Baldwin (1981)
Affective-cognitive consistency and the effect of salient behavioral information on the self-perception of attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41
Bless Bless, Bohner Bohner, Schwarz Schwarz, Strack Strack (1990)
Mood and persuasion: A cognitive response analysisPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16
D. Schumann, R. Petty, D. Clemons (1990)
Predicting the Effectiveness of Different Strategies of Advertising Variation: A Test of the Repetition-Variation HypothesesJournal of Consumer Research, 17
M. Allen, Rodney Reynolds (1993)
The Elaboration Likelihood Model and the Sleeper Effect: An Assessment of Attitude Change over TimeCommunication Theory, 3
Hamilton Hamilton, Hunter Hunter, Burgoon Burgoon (1990)
An empirical investigation of an axiomatic model of language intensity on attitude changeJournal of Language and Social Psychology, 9
A. Pratkanis, A. Greenwald, Michael Leippe, Michael Baumgardner (1988)
In search of reliable persuasion effects: III. The sleeper effect is dead. Long live the sleeper effect.Journal of personality and social psychology, 54 2
R. Petty, J. Cacioppo (1977)
Forewarning, cognitive responding, and resistance to persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35
Ellen Berscheid (1966)
Opinion change and communicator-communicatee similarity and dissimilarity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4
H. Kelman (1961)
PROCESSES OF OPINION CHANGEPublic Opinion Quarterly, 25
Blair Johnson, A. Eagly (1989)
Effects of involvement on persuasion: a meta-analysisPsychological Bulletin, 106
D. Mackie, Leila Worth (1989)
Processing deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion.Journal of personality and social psychology, 57 1
Ajzen Ajzen (1987)
A new paradigm in the psychology of persuasionContemporary Psychology, 32
D. Mackie (1987)
Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53
R. Petty, Jeff Kasmer, C. Haugtvedt, J. Cacioppo (1987)
Source and message factors in persuasion: A reply to stiff's critique of the elaboration likelihood modelCommunication Monographs, 54
R. Petty, D. Schumann, Steven Richman, A. Strathman (1993)
Positive Mood and Persuasion: Different Roles for Affect Under High- and Low-Elaboration ConditionsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64
Paul Mongeau, James Stiff (1993)
Specifying Causal Relationships in the Elaboration Likelihood ModelCommunication Theory, 3
J. Bargh, S. Chaiken, R. Govender, F. Pratto (1992)
The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect.Journal of personality and social psychology, 62 6
N. Miller (1965)
Involvement and dogmatism as inhibitors of attitude changeJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1
R. Petty, J. Cacioppo, D. Schumann (1983)
Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of InvolvementJournal of Consumer Research, 10
J. Cacioppo, R. Petty, C. Kao, R. Rodríguez (1986)
Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51
D. Kenny, C. Judd (1984)
Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables.Psychological Bulletin, 96
S. Lee, S. Hershberger (1990)
A Simple Rule for Generating Equivalent Models in Covariance Structure Modeling.Multivariate behavioral research, 25 3
I. Ajzen (1987)
A New Paradigm in the Psychology of Persuasion: Communication and Persuasion.Psyccritiques, 32
M. Hamilton, J. Hunter, M. Burgoon (1990)
An Empirical Test of an Axiomatic Model of the Relationship Between Language Intensity and PersuasionJournal of Language and Social Psychology, 9
James Stiff (1986)
Cognitive processing of persuasive message cues: A meta‐analytic review of the effects of supporting information on attitudesCommunication Monographs, 53
R. Petty, J. Cacioppo, M. Heesacker (1981)
Effects of rhetorical questions on persuasion: A cognitive response analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40
S. Chaiken (1980)
Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39
Deborah Gruenfeld, R. Wyer (1992)
Semantics and pragmatics of social influence: how affirmations and denials affect beliefs in referent propositions.Journal of personality and social psychology, 62 1
Michael Leippe, Roger Elkin (1987)
When motives clash: Issue involvement and response involvement as determinants of persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52
R. Petty, J. Cacioppo, C. Haugtvedt (1992)
Ego-Involvement and Persuasion: An Appreciative Look at the Sherif’s Contribution to the Study of Self-Relevance and Attitude Change
J. Cacioppo, R. Petty, K. Morris (1983)
Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45
Lydon Lydon, Zanna Zanna, Ross Ross (1988)
Bolstering attitudes by autobiographical recall: Attitude persistence and selective memoryPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14
R. Petty, J. Cacioppo, Jeff Kasmer, C. Haugtvedt (1987)
A reply to Stiff and BosterCommunication Monographs, 54
Conceptual and Methodological Issues in the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion: A Reply to the Michigan State Critics of this journal, however, Stiff and Bos- ter returned with new misperceptions and criticisms and were joined by some of their Michigan State associates (Hamilton, Hunter & Boster , 1993; Mongeau & Stiff, 1993; Allen & Reynolds, 1993).â Before providing our comments on the individual critiques, we address some general features of the ELM. The Elaboration Likelihood Modd of Persuasion The ELM assumes that people want to be correct in their attitudes and opinions, but that there are a variety of ways in which a reasonable position may be adopted following exposure to a persuasive message.â In particulx, the ELM focuses on the extent to which peopleâs attitudes are deter. mined by their careful scrutiny of all of the available information in the persuasion environment along the dirnensions central to the perceived merits of the issue (central route to attitude change), versus their reliance on relatively simple âcuesâ in the persuasion setting that determine attitudes via simpler association (e.g., Staats &: Staats, 1958), on-line inference (e.g., Bem, 1972), or memory-based heuristic (e.g., Chaiken, 1987) processes (peripheral route to attitude change).
Communication Theory – Oxford University Press
Published: Nov 1, 1993
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.