Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Commentary: Accepting what we dont know will lead to progress

Commentary: Accepting what we dont know will lead to progress 260 International Journal of Epidemiology, 2016, Vol. 45, No. 1 23. Kjaergard LL, Gluud C. Citation bias of hepato-biliary random- 32. Bayer R. Restricting dietary salt and public health: is the eviden- ized clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:407–10. tiary foundation crumbling? Milbank Q 2014;92:659–61. 24. Ioannidis JP. A generalized view of self-citation: direct, co-au- 33. Elliott KC, Resnik DB. Science, policy, and the transparency of thor, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation. values. Environ Health Perspect 2014;122:647–50. J Psychosom Res 2015;78:7–11. 34. Barnes DE, Bero LA. Why review articles on the health effects of 25. Nieminen P, Rucker G, Miettunen J, Carpenter J, Schumacher passive smoking reach different conclusions. JAMA 1998;279: M. Statistically significant papers in psychiatry were cited more 1566–70. often than others. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:939–46. 35. Stelfox HT, Chua G, O’Rourke K, Detsky AS. Conflict of inter- 26. Etter JF, Stapleton J. Citations to trials of nicotine replacement est in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists. N Engl J therapy were biased toward positive results and high-impact- Med 1998;338:101–06. factor journals. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:831–37. 36. Rothman DJ. Consequences of industry relationships for public 27. Perino AC, Hoang DD, Holmes TH et al. Association between health and http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Epidemiology Oxford University Press

Commentary: Accepting what we dont know will lead to progress

Download PDF
3 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/commentary-accepting-what-we-don-t-know-will-lead-to-progress-Jom0KAv5ab
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
The Author 2016; all rights reserved. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association
ISSN
0300-5771
eISSN
1464-3685
DOI
10.1093/ije/dyw014
pmid
26888873
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

260 International Journal of Epidemiology, 2016, Vol. 45, No. 1 23. Kjaergard LL, Gluud C. Citation bias of hepato-biliary random- 32. Bayer R. Restricting dietary salt and public health: is the eviden- ized clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:407–10. tiary foundation crumbling? Milbank Q 2014;92:659–61. 24. Ioannidis JP. A generalized view of self-citation: direct, co-au- 33. Elliott KC, Resnik DB. Science, policy, and the transparency of thor, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation. values. Environ Health Perspect 2014;122:647–50. J Psychosom Res 2015;78:7–11. 34. Barnes DE, Bero LA. Why review articles on the health effects of 25. Nieminen P, Rucker G, Miettunen J, Carpenter J, Schumacher passive smoking reach different conclusions. JAMA 1998;279: M. Statistically significant papers in psychiatry were cited more 1566–70. often than others. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:939–46. 35. Stelfox HT, Chua G, O’Rourke K, Detsky AS. Conflict of inter- 26. Etter JF, Stapleton J. Citations to trials of nicotine replacement est in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists. N Engl J therapy were biased toward positive results and high-impact- Med 1998;338:101–06. factor journals. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:831–37. 36. Rothman DJ. Consequences of industry relationships for public 27. Perino AC, Hoang DD, Holmes TH et al. Association between health and

Journal

International Journal of Epidemiology – Oxford University Press

Published: Feb 17, 2016

There are no references for this article.