Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Characterization of Measured Menthol in 48 U.S. Cigarette Sub-Brands

Characterization of Measured Menthol in 48 U.S. Cigarette Sub-Brands More than 25% of cigarettes sold in the United States are branded as mentholated, and these cigarettes are smoked disproportionately among populations with disparate tobacco-related health outcomes. This study is the first (findependent of the tobacco industry) to report menthol for 48 popular commercially available mentholated cigarette subbrands. The dependent variable “menthol per cigarette” was obtained by gas chromatography–mass spectrometer assay, whereas average per-cigarette milligram weight of tobacco filler (“tobacco per cigarette”) was determined gravimetrically. Pearson's correlations assessed associations among continuous variables. Analyses of variance assessed mean differences on the independent variables of interest: manufacturer, brand family, industry descriptors of length (100 mm and King [85 mm]) and label (ultralight, light, medium/mild, and regular/full flavor), and a category constructed by the authors of exclusively menthol brand families (those without a nonmenthol offering; Kool, Newport, and Salem) versus others (GPC, Camel, and Marlboro). Results showed menthol per cigarette and menthol per tobacco (i.e., milligrams of menthol per gram of tobacco filler) to be significantly greater in cigarettes labeled with industry descriptors of ultralight or light, belying the common consumer perception that “light” means less. Menthol per cigarette and tobacco per cigarette were significantly greater in 100-mm compared with 85-mm cigarettes. The study results are consistent with prior research that suggests menthol may be used to offset reductions in smoke delivery or impact and to facilitate compensatory smoke inhalation behaviors in smokers of cigarettes with reduced machine-measured smoke delivery. Tobacco manufacturers should be required by federal or other regulatory agencies to report the amount of menthol added to cigarettes. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Nicotine and Tobacco Research Oxford University Press

Characterization of Measured Menthol in 48 U.S. Cigarette Sub-Brands

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/characterization-of-measured-menthol-in-48-u-s-cigarette-sub-brands-WSMC6FoYHc

References (10)

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© Published by Oxford University Press.
ISSN
1462-2203
eISSN
1469-994X
DOI
10.1080/14622200500186270
pmid
16085523
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

More than 25% of cigarettes sold in the United States are branded as mentholated, and these cigarettes are smoked disproportionately among populations with disparate tobacco-related health outcomes. This study is the first (findependent of the tobacco industry) to report menthol for 48 popular commercially available mentholated cigarette subbrands. The dependent variable “menthol per cigarette” was obtained by gas chromatography–mass spectrometer assay, whereas average per-cigarette milligram weight of tobacco filler (“tobacco per cigarette”) was determined gravimetrically. Pearson's correlations assessed associations among continuous variables. Analyses of variance assessed mean differences on the independent variables of interest: manufacturer, brand family, industry descriptors of length (100 mm and King [85 mm]) and label (ultralight, light, medium/mild, and regular/full flavor), and a category constructed by the authors of exclusively menthol brand families (those without a nonmenthol offering; Kool, Newport, and Salem) versus others (GPC, Camel, and Marlboro). Results showed menthol per cigarette and menthol per tobacco (i.e., milligrams of menthol per gram of tobacco filler) to be significantly greater in cigarettes labeled with industry descriptors of ultralight or light, belying the common consumer perception that “light” means less. Menthol per cigarette and tobacco per cigarette were significantly greater in 100-mm compared with 85-mm cigarettes. The study results are consistent with prior research that suggests menthol may be used to offset reductions in smoke delivery or impact and to facilitate compensatory smoke inhalation behaviors in smokers of cigarettes with reduced machine-measured smoke delivery. Tobacco manufacturers should be required by federal or other regulatory agencies to report the amount of menthol added to cigarettes.

Journal

Nicotine and Tobacco ResearchOxford University Press

Published: Aug 1, 2005

There are no references for this article.