Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Subcellular distribution and kinetic properties of cytosolic and non‐cytosolic hexokinases in maize seedling roots: implications for hexose phosphorylation

Subcellular distribution and kinetic properties of cytosolic and non‐cytosolic hexokinases in... Abstract Hexose phosphorylation by hexokinases plays an important role in glycolysis, biosynthesis and control of sugar‐modulated genes. Several cytosolic hexokinase and fructokinase isoforms have been characterized and organelle‐bound hexokinases have also been detected in higher plants. In this study a hexokinase activity is described that is inhibited by ADP (Ki=30 μM) and mannoheptulose (Ki≅300 μM) in non‐cytosolic fractions (mitochondria, Golgi apparatus and microsomes) obtained from preparations of seedling roots of maize (Zea mays L.). The catalytic efficiency (Vmax/Km) for both ATP and glucose in all non‐cytosolic hexokinase fractions is more than one order of magnitude higher than that of cytosolic hexokinase and fructokinases. Low (30%) or no ADP and mannoheptulose inhibition is observed with hexokinase and fructokinase activities derived from the cytosolic compartment obtained after ion exchange and affinity chromatography. The soluble fructokinase (FK) shows fructose cooperativity (Hill n>2). The Vmax/Km ratio is about 3‐fold higher for ATP than for other NTPs and no difference for hexose phosphorylation efficiencies is found between cytosolic hexokinase and fructokinase isoforms (FK1, FK2) with ATP as substrate. The Ki for fructose inhibition is 2 mM for FK1 and 25 mM for FK2. The data indicate that low energy‐charge and glucose analogues preferentially inhibit the membrane‐bound hexokinases possibly involved in sugar‐sensing, but not the cytosolic hexokinases and fructokinases. Non‐cytosolic hexokinase, fructokinase, hexose‐phosphorylation, glucose analogues, Zea mays L. Introduction Hexokinase [EC 2.7.1.1] catalyses the ATP‐dependent conversion of hexoses to hexose‐6‐phosphate and ADP. Several hexokinases with tissue specificity or developmentally regulated expression have been described in plants (Renz et al., 1993; Galina et al., 1995). Different genes encoding hexokinases (Dai et al., 1995; Jang et al., 1997) and a fructokinase (Smith et al., 1993) have been cloned. From the viewpoint of metabolic flux, the hexokinase reaction plays a key role in the removal of free hexoses from the cytosol, channelling the carbons to either glycolysis or biosynthesis, depending on cellular demands. In previous studies, two hexokinases were distinguished by different sensitivities to ADP and different subcellular locations in maize roots (Galina et al., 1995, 1999). The mitochondria‐bound hexokinase has a higher affinity for glucose than for fructose and is strongly inhibited by ADP (Ki=20–40 μM). The inhibition is non‐competitive with respect to both ATP and glucose. High cytoplasmic ADP concentrations (∼200 μM) are found in maize roots during hypoxia (Hooks et al., 1994), indicating a low mitochondrial hexokinase activity under this condition. In contrast, the soluble hexokinase is not inhibited by ADP concentrations up to 1 mM (Galina et al., 1995), a kinetic property that is compatible with its glycolytic role. Recently, using [U‐14C]‐glucose as an isotopic tracer, it was found that non‐cytosolic hexokinase forms the precursors that are essential for conversion of glucose to NDP‐5′‐sugar in maize root homogenates (Galina and da‐Silva, 2000). A surprising finding was that ADP and mannoheptulose block NDP‐5′‐sugar formation, although they do not impair the formation of cytosolic glucose‐6‐phosphate. These results indicate that the non‐cytosolic hexokinase is not engaged in glycolysis. Mannoheptulose, a specific hexokinase inhibitor, has little effect on the cytosolic glucose phosphorylation (Galina and da‐Silva, 2000). Several sugar hexokinase inhibitors such as mannoheptulose, N‐acetylglucosamine and glucosamine have been widely used as experimental tools, for example, to determine catalytic site structure of glucokinases and hexokinases or to inhibit carbohydrate metabolism in many cell types (Jang and Sheen, 1994; Xu et al., 1995; Board et al., 1995; Malaisse, 1998). In plants these investigations are scarce, in part due to a small number of isolated hexokinase isoforms. Only in the past few years has the existence of sugar‐regulated gene expression in plants become apparent, based on a molecular genetic approach (Dai et al., 1999; Graham et al., 1994; Jang et al., 1997; Koch, 1996). Of crucial importance in these studies was the observation that specific hexokinase inhibitors, such as mannoheptulose and glucosamine, block glucose repression in plant cells (Jang and Sheen, 1994; Umemura et al., 1998). Although hexokinase is commonly known as a glycolytic enzyme, it has been implicated as a glucose sensor that mediates the repression of genes involved in photosynthesis, the glyoxylate cycle and synthesis of α‐amylase (Jang and Sheen, 1994; Graham et al., 1994; Umemura et al., 1998). This property may have potential interest as a target for manipulation and modification of hexokinases for crop improvement (Dunwell, 2000). As pointed out by Taylor (Taylor, 1997; see also Umemura et al., 1998), knowledge of the subcellular distribution of hexokinases in plants may help to elucidate the components in the signal transduction pathways triggered by hexokinase phosphorylation of fructose and glucose. The properties of ADP regulation are different between soluble and particulate hexokinase fractions (Galina et al., 1995). The aim of this study was to investigate the localization of hexokinases by differential centrifugation and to correlate their subcellular distribution with their sensitivity to glucose analogue inhibitors and their steady‐state kinetic properties. All hexokinase activities measured in 10000 and 100000 g pellet fractions are defined as non‐cytosolic hexokinases (NC‐HK) in order to distinguish them from the cytosolic soluble fractions FK1, FK2 and HK1. Most of the NC‐HK activity is bound to mitochondria (Galina et al., 1995, 1999), and resides in submitochondrial particle membranes (SMP). Although, in pea roots, it was found that 16% of HK activity was associated with plastids (Borchert et al., 1993), in maize roots, this activity corresponds to only 5% of the total, as estimated by the plastidic markers ADP‐Glc pyrophosphorylase and triose phosphate isomerase (Galina et al., 1995; Galina and da‐Silva, 2000). Non‐cytosolic hexokinase activity is also not detectable in amyloplast preparations derived from developing corn endosperm (Echeverria et al., 1988). The results of this study show that ADP and hexokinase inhibitors preferentially affect the phosphorylation of fructose and glucose in mitochondria and Golgi‐vesicle preparations, with little or no effect on cytosolic hexokinase activities. Materials and methods Preparation of plant material and isolation of cell fractions Maize seeds (Zea mays L.) were surface‐sterilized with sodium hypochlorite (∼10 min in a 3% solution) and then washed with sterile water. Radicles were harvested from seeds allowed to germinate for 3–4 d on wet filter paper in the dark at 28 °C. Root homogenates and submitochondrial particles were obtained as previously described (Galina et al., 1995) using a cold extraction buffer (buffer A) containing: 5 mM HEPES/TRIS pH 7.4, 0.3 M sucrose, 7 mM cysteine, 1 mM EGTA, and 1 mM PMSF. The crude mitochondrial pellet was obtained from the first centrifugation (10000 g for 12 min). The supernatant of the first 10000 g centrifugation (cytosolic supernatant) was used for cytosolic HK assays. The cytosolic fraction was then centrifuged for 100000 g for 50 min, the pellet (microsomes) was stored and the supernatant (soluble proteins) was used to obtain soluble FK and HK. Discontinuous sucrose gradient Washed mitochondria (1.2 ml samples; 50–60 mg of protein) were resuspended in buffer A, added to a discontinuous sucrose gradient and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor (Beckman SW 27) for 45 min at 40 000 g (Douce et al., 1972). The gradients were prepared by layering sucrose solutions into a centrifuge tube in the following sequence: 1.5 M (2 ml), 1.2 M (2 ml), 0.9 M (2 ml), and 0.6 M (2 ml). Following centrifugation six main bands were obtained: B1 (∼ 2 ml of 0.6 M), B2 (interface of 0.6 and 0.9 M), B3 (∼ 2 ml of 0.9 M), B4 (interface of 0.9 and 1.2 M), B5 (∼ 2 ml of 1.2 M) and B6 (interface of 1.2 and 1.5 M). The sucrose gradient separates the Golgi vesicles and mitochondria. For some experiments, Golgi vesicles (bands B1 to B2) were further diluted to 0.5 M sucrose and purified by flotation centrifugation as described earlier (Morré, 1971). Partial purification of cytosolic fructokinases and hexokinase The soluble proteins were fractionated by the addition of solid (NH4)2SO4. The precipitate formed at 50% salt saturation (31.3 g added to 100 ml of final volume) was centrifuged (30 000 g, 15 min) and discarded. The salt saturation of the supernatant was raised to 60% (adding 6.6 g to 100 ml) and the precipitate was centrifuged and dissolved in 3 ml buffer B (like buffer A, but without sucrose and with 20 mM TRIS‐HCl instead of HEPES/TRIS). The supernatant concentration was raised to 70% salt saturation (adding 6.9 g to 100 ml) and the precipitate was centrifuged and dissolved in 3 ml buffer B. After (NH4)2SO4 precipitation each fraction (60% and 70% saturation) was separated from contaminating proteins with a DEAE‐Toyopearl column (21.6×1.2 cm). With 1 mM fructose as substrate, only one peak of activity was detected in the 60% fraction (FK1) and there was no glucose phosphorylation activity present. The 70% fraction had both fructose and glucose phosphorylation activities (FK2, HK1). The proteins bound to the column were eluted with a linear salt gradient from 0 to 0.4 M NaCl. An attempt was made to further separate the glucose and fructose activities by affinity chromatography (Renz et al., 1993) to determine if they were due to one or two enzymes. The method involved a Cibacron‐Blue 3GA (Sigma) column (4×1.5 cm) and elution with 0–3 mM ATP. The three enzymes were characterized kinetically. Assay of hexokinase activity Each fraction was assayed for hexokinase activity in a medium containing 20 mM TRIS‐HCl pH 7.5, 6 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ATP, 2 mM phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), 10 units ml−1 pyruvate kinase, 0.1% (v/v) Triton X‐100, 5 mM NaN3, 5 mM NaF, 0.1 mM P1,P5‐diadenosine‐5′‐pentaphosphate, and the appropriate glucose or fructose concentrations. When ADP was studied, the pyruvate kinase was omitted from the medium. Assays were initiated with ATP or by adding protein fractions (20–120 μg protein ml−1) and were quenched after 5–10 min at 30 °C by heating (1 min at 100 °C). The glucose‐6‐phosphate formed was measured by adding an equal volume of a solution containing 20 mM TRIS‐HCl pH 7.5, 6 mM MgCl2, 0.7 units ml−1 glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase (Leuconostoc mesenteroids) (Sigma Chemical Co.) and 0.3 mM β‐NAD+. For fructose‐6‐phosphate determination 3.5 units ml−1 phosphoglucoseisomerase were included in the assay medium. In continuous spectrophotometric assays the hexose‐6‐phosphate production was coupled with glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase and NAD reduction, by measuring the increase in A340. In all cases, activities were linear with the amount of protein added. Kinetic constants were calculated from Woolf–Augustinsson–Hofstee (v versus v/[S]) replots of kinetic data and by non‐linear regression analysis applied to the Michaelis–Menten or Hill equations using the program ENZFITTER. Ki values were calculated from Dixon (1/v versus [I]) plots. ADP quantification in homogenates and cytosolic fractions In the experiments where the ADP inhibition was tested during hexokinase activity assay, the ADP concentration was checked in order to evaluate the degree of its consumption by potential side‐reactions in the homogenate and cytosolic fractions. An aliquot of 150 μl was removed and boiled from the reaction mixture at the beginning and at the end of the assay. After centrifugation at 5000 g for 15 min, 100 μl of the supernatant was removed and the ADP was quantified by the addition of 400 μl of a medium containing: 20 mM TRIS‐HCl pH 7.5, 6 mM MgCl2, 2 mM PEP, 10 units ml−1 lactate dehydrogenase, 7 units ml−1 pyruvate kinase (rabbit muscle) (Sigma Chemical Co.), and 0.5 mM β‐NADH. The decrease in the absorbance at 340 nm was proportional to the amount of ADP. Other enzyme assays The UDPase activity, a Golgi marker enzyme (Widell and Larsson, 1990), was measured as previously described (Nagahashi and Kane, 1982). Membranes (10–100 μl) were added to 0.9 ml of assay buffer containing 30 mM MOPS‐TRIS, pH 6.5, 1 mM UDP and 2 mM MnSO4. Duplicate tubes with 0.02% (v/v) Triton X‐100 were prepared. The reaction was incubated at 35 °C for 20 min. Released Pi was determined according to Fiske and Subbarow (Fiske and Subbarow, 1925). Triton‐activated UDPase activity, referred to as latent UDPase activity, increased linearly with time. The mitochondrial ATPase activity was determined by measuring the release of Pi from ATP in the absence and presence of 5 mM NaN3 and 2 μg ml−1 oligomycin in a reaction medium containing 50 mM TRIS‐HCl (pH 8.0), 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ATP, and 5 μM FCCP. The difference between these activities is referred to as the azide‐sensitive ATPase activity and is related to the maize FoF1ATPase complex (Galina et al., 1995). Results Partial isolation of cytosolic fructokinases and hexokinase The 70% (NH4)2SO4 saturation fraction that was obtained from soluble proteins was resolved by ion exchange chromotography (Fig. 1). One peak, that was able to phosphorylate fructose but not glucose, was detected in the unbound protein fractions of the column (FK2). Another peak of activity was detected between 0.17 and 0.34 M of the NaCl gradient. This peak of activity phosphorylated both glucose and fructose (HK1). The affinity chromatography procedure was unable to separate these activities further so it is concluded that the activity resulted from a single enzyme. Fig. 1. Open in new tabDownload slide Separation by ion exchange chromatography of soluble fructokinase and hexokinase. The 70% ammonium sulphate saturation fraction from soluble extracts was partially purified by and ion‐exchange chromatography as described in Materials and methods. Samples of 50 μl from eluted fractions were assayed using 0.8 mM glucose (closed circles) or 0.8 mM fructose (open triangles) as substrate. Protein was measured at 280 nm (dot line). The assay temperature was 25 °C. The reaction was started by addition of 1 mM ATP. Localization of hexokinases in subcellular fractions of maize roots Inhibition of the hexokinase activity by ADP and mannoheptulose was tested in two major fractions obtained after homogenate centrifugation (Fig. 2). Mannoheptulose (30 mM) and ADP (250 μM) inhibited the activity by 50% in crude homogenates (Fig. 2A). However, with the cytosolic fraction, ADP had no effect and mannoheptulose caused a small inhibition (about 20%) (Fig. 2B). The ADP concentration was not significantly decreased by side‐reactions in the homogenate and cytosolic fractions. The ADP measured at the final of reaction time was 266±3 μM (n=3). An almost total inhibition was observed with either ADP or mannoheptulose in the pellet fraction obtained after a 10000 g centrifugation (Fig. 2C). The cytosolic supernatant (100000 g) (Fig. 2B) and pellet (10000 g) (Fig. 2C) fractions were fractionated further in Fig. 3. The total soluble glucose and fructose phosphorylating activities obtained after centrifugation at 100000 g (S100, Fig. 3A) were fractionated sequentially by addition of (NH4)2SO4. It became apparent that, when 0.8 mM glucose or fructose was the substrate in the assays, more fructose than glucose was phosphorylated (∼70% of the total), especially when the (NH4)2SO4 saturation was between 50% and 70% (Fig. 3A, black bars). The glucose phosphorylated was about one‐half of the fructose phosphorylated. Although the soluble activity measured with glucose was present in all (NH4)2SO4 fractions, it was more evident between 60% and 80% of (NH4)2SO4 saturation (Fig. 3A, grey bars). This result suggests the presence of distinct hexokinase and fructokinase activities in the cytosolic compartment. When the pellet (10000 g) fraction (Fig. 2C) was further separated on a sucrose gradient, it revealed non‐cytosolic hexokinase (NC‐HK) activity in distinct organelles (Fig. 3B). Five major bands from the sucrose gradient were assayed. The Golgi marker (UDPase) was concentrated in bands 1 and 2, while mitochondrial marker (FoF1ATPase) predominated in bands 4, 5, and 6. The NC‐HK activity appeared to be associated with both mitochondria and Golgi membranes. In addition to a large fraction of total NC‐HK activity detected in band 6, where FoF1ATPase predominates, Golgi vesicles isolated from lighter bands by flotation centrifugation as described previously (Morré, 1971) also exhibited high specific activity of hexokinase, totally inhibited by mannoheptulose and ADP (data not shown). The hexokinase specific activities for different non‐cytosolic fractions (mean ±s.e.) were: microsomes 0.014±0.006 (n=4), crude mitochondria 0.082±0.023 (n=7), washed mitochondria 0.18±0.05 (n=5), Golgi vesicles (Morré, 1971) 0.53±0.14 (n=3), and SMP preparations 1.31±0.32 (n=3) μmol min−1 mg−1. With this method of preparing Golgi vesicles, mitochondrial contamination is reduced to ∼13%. Fig. 2. Open in new tabDownload slide Subcellular distribution of maize root hexokinase.The hexokinase activity was measured in a continuous assay (see Materials and methods) in the presence of 0.8 mM glucose plus 10 units ml−1 pyruvate kinase (○); 30 mM mannoheptulose–MH (•) or 250 μM ADP without pyruvate kinase (▵). The reaction was started by the addition of 1 mM ATP (↓). The final protein concentration was: In (A) total homogenate, 0.12 mg ml−1; (B) soluble fraction (100 000 g supernatant), 0.1 mg ml−1; and (C) pellet fraction (10 000 g), 0.05 mg ml−1. Fig. 3. Open in new tabDownload slide Subfractionation of cytosolic and non‐cytosolic maize root hexokinases. The different soluble (A) fractions, 2 ml each, were obtained by precipitation by adding ammonium sulphate to S100 supernatant (Cytosol) as described in (Materials and methods). The specific activity with each sugar substrate (μmol mg−1 protein min−1) was multiplied by the total protein (mg) in each fraction and expressed as percentage of total hexose phosphorylation (the sum of total activity measured with 0.8 mM glucose=21.77 μmol min−1; and total activity measured with 0.8 mM fructose=48.81 μmol min−1). The total protein in S100 was 143 mg. The 100% of total hexoses phosphorylation activity in S100 was 70.6 μmol min−1. In (B) the specific activity with each substrate (μmol mg−1 protein min−1) was multiplied by the total protein (mg) in each band colected (2 ml) from sucrose gradient and expressed % of total activity measured in the pellet fraction (10 000 g). The UDPase and FoF1ATPase activities were started by adding protein from the pellet (10 000 g) or from each sucrose gradient band to the appropriate medium as described (see Materials and methods). The 100% values obtained in this way are: UDPase (empty bar)=0.58±0.11 μmol Pi min−1; FoF1ATPase (black bar)=1.39±0.47 μmol Pi min−1 and NC‐HK (gray bar)=14.9±3.3 μmol glucose‐6‐P min−1. The total protein in the pellet fraction was 182±51 mg. The values represent means ±SE of three different preparations. HK inhibitors impair phosphorylation of hexoses by non‐cytosolic hexokinase The activities of soluble cytosolic fructokinases and hexokinases that had been partially purified from the soluble fraction (Fig. 2B), were compared with that of the NC‐HK fraction (Fig. 4). Neither mannoheptulose nor N‐acetylglucosamine inhibited the cytosolic FK1 activity, even at a low fructose concentration (0.2 mM). The ability of mannoheptulose to inhibit phosphorylation of glucose by the cytosolic HK1 fraction was also very low: in the presence of 0.8 mM glucose the activity was reduced by ∼30% with 30 mM mannoheptulose (Fig. 5B). These results indicate that neither of the cytosolic hexokinases is greatly affected by a wide range of inhibitor concentrations. Similar results were observed with mannoheptulose using cytosolic glucokinase purified from young tomato fruit (Martinez‐Barajas and Randall, 1998). A significant inhibition occurred when the inhibitors were added to assays containing the NC‐HK fraction associated with SMPs (open symbols in Figs 4, 5A). The inhibition was observed with either fructose or glucose as substrate. The inhibition was practically abolished when the glucose concentration was raised from 0.8 mM to 20 mM, indicating a competitive inhibition (Fig. 5A). An increase in fructose concentration from 30 to 200 mM did not totally overcome the mannoheptulose inhibition, either with SMP or Golgi‐vesicle preparations (data not shown). In agreement with previous data (Galina et al., 1995), the NC‐HK was effectively inhibited by ADP when the substrate was glucose (Fig. 4C, open circles). However, when fructose was the substrate, the ADP inhibition is much lower (Fig. 4C, open triangles) (Galina et al., 1999). A small ADP inhibition was detected with FK1, FK2 and HK1 at higher ADP concentrations (Fig. 4C). Fig. 4. Open in new tabDownload slide Effects of sugar analogue inhibitors (A, B) and ADP (C) on soluble FK1, FK2 and HK1 and on NC‐HK. The activities were assayed as described in Materials and methods. The reactions were started by the addition of FK1 (▴, 0.1 mg ml−1), FK2 (▪, 0.12 mg ml−1), HK1 (•, 0.12 mg ml−1) or NC‐HK (○, ▵; submitochondrial particles, 0.05 mg ml−1). The concentrations of fructose were: (▴, ▪) 0.2 mM or (▵) 5 mM. The concentration of glucose was: (○, •) 0.2 mM. The 100% activities were: FK1 (▴)=0.83±0.12 μmol fructose‐6‐P min−1 mg−1; FK2 (▪)=0.71±0.09 μmol fructose‐6‐P min−1 mg−1; HK1 (•)=0.25±0.04 μmol glucose‐6‐P min−1 mg−1; NC‐HK: (○)=1.66±0.21 μmol glucose‐6‐P min−1 mg−1; or (▵)=1.21±0.18 μmol fructose‐6‐P min−1 mg−1. The specific activities values are mean ±SE of at least four independent measurements. Fig. 5. Open in new tabDownload slide Effect of mannoheptulose on non‐cytosolic (A) and cytosolic (B) hexokinases. The activities were assayed as described in Materials and methods and the legend to Fig. 4. The concentrations of glucose were: 0.8 mM (empty bars) or 20 mM (black bars). Kinetic properties of cytosolic and non‐cytosolic hexokinases The kinetic constants for the nucleotide‐5′‐triphosphate and hexose substrates of FK1, FK2, HK1, and NC‐HK are shown in Table 1. For FK1 and FK2, the Vmax values were practically the same for all NTP's. However, the NC‐HK showed a marked preference for ATP, with a Vmax ranging from 2.4–5.4‐fold higher with ATP than other NTPs. Thus, although all hexokinases analysed in this study utilized ATP most efficiently as a phosphoryl donor, based on the Vmax/Km ratio (Table 1, last column), the difference between ATP and the other NTPs was much greater for NC‐HK. This result suggests that cytosolic fructokinases may utilize other NTPs fairly readily. A comparison of the kinetic constants for glucose and fructose revealed that FK1 uses only fructose as substrate (Table 1; Fig. 6A). In addition, FK1 has a strong positive co‐operativity with respect to fructose for fructose phosphorylation, with a Hill coefficient for fructose greater than 2 (Fig. 6A, closed triangles). Despite the similarity of kinetic constants for phosphorylation of fructose by FK1 and FK2, the co‐operative behaviour was not observed for FK2 (Fig. 6A, open triangles). The Vmax of HK1 was 1.7 times higher with fructose (Fig. 6B, open circles) than that with glucose as substrate. Since the affinity of HK1 for both hexoses was practically the same, the HK1 has a catalytic efficiency higher when using fructose as substrate (Table 1). In contrast, NC‐HK exhibited a catalytic efficiency for glucose that was 84‐fold higher than for fructose as substrate (Fig. 6C; Table 1). The inhibitor constants (Ki) for different inhibitors of the soluble and membrane‐bound hexokinases are shown in Table 2. As described for other plant fructokinases (Doehlert, 1990; Renz et al., 1993), FK1 and FK2 exhibited substrate inhibition when the fructose concentration exceeded 1 mM (Fig. 6A; Table 2). FK1 was 10‐fold more sensitive to inhibition by fructose than FK2. In contrast, the membrane‐bound HK did not exhibit substrate inhibition (Fig. 6C), and was sensitive to the HK inhibitors mannoheptulose, N‐acetylglucosamine, glucosamine, and ADP. The Ki values for NC‐HK were lower when the sugar substrate was fructose (Table 2). This was not the case for ADP: the Ki value was 10‐fold higher with fructose as substrate (Galina et al., 1999). The FK1, FK2 and HK1 activities were partially affected by 1 mM ADP (Table 2; Fig. 4C). Fig. 6. Open in new tabDownload slide Kinetic responses of FK1, FK2, HK1, and NC‐HK activities to increasing fructose or glucose concentrations. The activities were assayed as described in Materials and methods and the legend to Fig. 4. The activities are expressed as μmol hexose‐6‐P min−1 mg−1. In (A) responses of FK1 (▴ 0.07 mg ml−1) or FK2 (▵, 0.08 mg ml−1) to increasing fructose concentration as substrate. The curve for FK1 was obtained by fitting the points to Hill equation, v=Vmax[S]/(1+K0.5[S])n. The Hill number was n=2.5±0.1. In (B) HK1 (0.09 mg ml−1) and (C) NC‐HK (0.055 mg ml−1) responses to increasing glucose (•) or fructose (○) concentration as substrates. In (B) and (C), curves from 0 to 0.6 mM were drawn using a simple Michaelis–Menten model. The ATP concentration was held constant at 1 mM using 2 mM PEP and 10 units ml−1 PK. For the sake of clarity, the abscissa scale was expanded from zero to 0.6 mM to show the kinetic behaviour of fructo‐ and hexokinases at the low range of hexose concentrations. An axis break in the abscissa was introduced from 0.6 mM to 1.4 mM hexose. Table 1. Kinetic constants for hexokinases in soluble and membrane fractions of maize roots Enzyme preparationsa Substrates Vmax (μmol H‐6P min−1 mg−1) K0.5b (mM) Vmax/K0.5 FK1 ATP 1.78±0.03 0.09±0.01 20.7 UTP 1.58±0.06 0.29±0.02  5.1 GTP 1.36±0.07 0.21±0.02  6.4 CTP 1.72±0.06 0.57±0.03  3.0 Fructose 1.35±0.07 0.13±0.02 10.8 Glucose N.D.c N.D. – FK2 ATP 1.00±0.02 0.06±0.01 16.13 UTP 0.94±0.04 0.34±0.04  2.76 GTP 0.90±0.02 0.21±0.03  4.25 CTP 1.10±0.06 0.58±0.10  1.9 Fructose 1.07±0.05 0.15±0.02  6.96 Glucose N.D. N.D. – HK1 Fructose 0.68±0.03 0.08±0.01  8.50 Glucose 0.39±0.01 0.08±0.02  4.88 NC‐HK ATP 2.55±0.02 0.05±0.01 50.9 UTP 1.06±0.10 1.32±0.22  0.81 GTP 0.77±0.09 1.41±0.28  0.55 CTP 0.47±0.04 1.47±0.38  0.32 Fructose 2.52±0.13 5.30±1.02 0.48 Glucose 2.43±0.05 0.06±0.01 40.5 Enzyme preparationsa Substrates Vmax (μmol H‐6P min−1 mg−1) K0.5b (mM) Vmax/K0.5 FK1 ATP 1.78±0.03 0.09±0.01 20.7 UTP 1.58±0.06 0.29±0.02  5.1 GTP 1.36±0.07 0.21±0.02  6.4 CTP 1.72±0.06 0.57±0.03  3.0 Fructose 1.35±0.07 0.13±0.02 10.8 Glucose N.D.c N.D. – FK2 ATP 1.00±0.02 0.06±0.01 16.13 UTP 0.94±0.04 0.34±0.04  2.76 GTP 0.90±0.02 0.21±0.03  4.25 CTP 1.10±0.06 0.58±0.10  1.9 Fructose 1.07±0.05 0.15±0.02  6.96 Glucose N.D. N.D. – HK1 Fructose 0.68±0.03 0.08±0.01  8.50 Glucose 0.39±0.01 0.08±0.02  4.88 NC‐HK ATP 2.55±0.02 0.05±0.01 50.9 UTP 1.06±0.10 1.32±0.22  0.81 GTP 0.77±0.09 1.41±0.28  0.55 CTP 0.47±0.04 1.47±0.38  0.32 Fructose 2.52±0.13 5.30±1.02 0.48 Glucose 2.43±0.05 0.06±0.01 40.5 aThe enzyme preparations were obtained from the cytosol (FK1, FK2 and HK1) or from submitochondrial particles (NC‐HK) as described in Materials and methods. The Km values for nucleotides were measured with 0.8 mM fructose in FK1 and FK2 or 0.8 mM glucose in HK1 and NC‐HK assays. The nucleotide affinities for HK1 were practically the same as those of FK2. bK0.5 values for hexoses were measured with 1 mM ATP in all enzyme preparations. For assay conditions see Materials and Methods. The values represent mean ±SE of at least three different preparations. cND, not detectable. Open in new tab Table 1. Kinetic constants for hexokinases in soluble and membrane fractions of maize roots Enzyme preparationsa Substrates Vmax (μmol H‐6P min−1 mg−1) K0.5b (mM) Vmax/K0.5 FK1 ATP 1.78±0.03 0.09±0.01 20.7 UTP 1.58±0.06 0.29±0.02  5.1 GTP 1.36±0.07 0.21±0.02  6.4 CTP 1.72±0.06 0.57±0.03  3.0 Fructose 1.35±0.07 0.13±0.02 10.8 Glucose N.D.c N.D. – FK2 ATP 1.00±0.02 0.06±0.01 16.13 UTP 0.94±0.04 0.34±0.04  2.76 GTP 0.90±0.02 0.21±0.03  4.25 CTP 1.10±0.06 0.58±0.10  1.9 Fructose 1.07±0.05 0.15±0.02  6.96 Glucose N.D. N.D. – HK1 Fructose 0.68±0.03 0.08±0.01  8.50 Glucose 0.39±0.01 0.08±0.02  4.88 NC‐HK ATP 2.55±0.02 0.05±0.01 50.9 UTP 1.06±0.10 1.32±0.22  0.81 GTP 0.77±0.09 1.41±0.28  0.55 CTP 0.47±0.04 1.47±0.38  0.32 Fructose 2.52±0.13 5.30±1.02 0.48 Glucose 2.43±0.05 0.06±0.01 40.5 Enzyme preparationsa Substrates Vmax (μmol H‐6P min−1 mg−1) K0.5b (mM) Vmax/K0.5 FK1 ATP 1.78±0.03 0.09±0.01 20.7 UTP 1.58±0.06 0.29±0.02  5.1 GTP 1.36±0.07 0.21±0.02  6.4 CTP 1.72±0.06 0.57±0.03  3.0 Fructose 1.35±0.07 0.13±0.02 10.8 Glucose N.D.c N.D. – FK2 ATP 1.00±0.02 0.06±0.01 16.13 UTP 0.94±0.04 0.34±0.04  2.76 GTP 0.90±0.02 0.21±0.03  4.25 CTP 1.10±0.06 0.58±0.10  1.9 Fructose 1.07±0.05 0.15±0.02  6.96 Glucose N.D. N.D. – HK1 Fructose 0.68±0.03 0.08±0.01  8.50 Glucose 0.39±0.01 0.08±0.02  4.88 NC‐HK ATP 2.55±0.02 0.05±0.01 50.9 UTP 1.06±0.10 1.32±0.22  0.81 GTP 0.77±0.09 1.41±0.28  0.55 CTP 0.47±0.04 1.47±0.38  0.32 Fructose 2.52±0.13 5.30±1.02 0.48 Glucose 2.43±0.05 0.06±0.01 40.5 aThe enzyme preparations were obtained from the cytosol (FK1, FK2 and HK1) or from submitochondrial particles (NC‐HK) as described in Materials and methods. The Km values for nucleotides were measured with 0.8 mM fructose in FK1 and FK2 or 0.8 mM glucose in HK1 and NC‐HK assays. The nucleotide affinities for HK1 were practically the same as those of FK2. bK0.5 values for hexoses were measured with 1 mM ATP in all enzyme preparations. For assay conditions see Materials and Methods. The values represent mean ±SE of at least three different preparations. cND, not detectable. Open in new tab Table 2. Inhibitor constants (Ki) for hexokinase and fructokinase inhibitors in soluble and membrane fractions of maize roots Enzyme preparationsa Inhibitors Kib (mM) Glucose as substrate Fructose as substrate FK1 Mannoheptulose – No inhibition N–Acetylglucosamine – No inhibition Glucosamine – No inhibition ADP – No inhibition Fructose – 2.3±0.7 FK2 Mannoheptulose – No inhibition N–Acetylglucosamine – No inhibition Glucosamine – No inhibition ADP – No inhibition Fructose – 25.2±6.5 HK1 Mannoheptulose 20.5±5.1 – N–Acetylglucosamine – – Glucosamine 79.8±6.7 – ADP No inhibition – Fructose – – NC–HK Mannoheptulose 0.47±0.02 0.08±0.01 N–Acetylglucosamine 0.49±0.02 0.15±0.02 Glucosamine 0.83±0.06 0.41±0.01 ADP 0.03±0.01 0.46±0.12 Fructose – No inhibition Enzyme preparationsa Inhibitors Kib (mM) Glucose as substrate Fructose as substrate FK1 Mannoheptulose – No inhibition N–Acetylglucosamine – No inhibition Glucosamine – No inhibition ADP – No inhibition Fructose – 2.3±0.7 FK2 Mannoheptulose – No inhibition N–Acetylglucosamine – No inhibition Glucosamine – No inhibition ADP – No inhibition Fructose – 25.2±6.5 HK1 Mannoheptulose 20.5±5.1 – N–Acetylglucosamine – – Glucosamine 79.8±6.7 – ADP No inhibition – Fructose – – NC–HK Mannoheptulose 0.47±0.02 0.08±0.01 N–Acetylglucosamine 0.49±0.02 0.15±0.02 Glucosamine 0.83±0.06 0.41±0.01 ADP 0.03±0.01 0.46±0.12 Fructose – No inhibition aThe enzyme preparations were obtained as described in Table 1. bKi values were calculated as described in Materials and methods. The values represent mean ±SE of at least three different preparations. The symbol (–) mean that the assay was not performed under that condition. No inhibition refers to lack of inhibition up to 300 mM of each hexose analogue, 500 μM ADP or 300 mM fructose or glucose tested for inhibition. Open in new tab Table 2. Inhibitor constants (Ki) for hexokinase and fructokinase inhibitors in soluble and membrane fractions of maize roots Enzyme preparationsa Inhibitors Kib (mM) Glucose as substrate Fructose as substrate FK1 Mannoheptulose – No inhibition N–Acetylglucosamine – No inhibition Glucosamine – No inhibition ADP – No inhibition Fructose – 2.3±0.7 FK2 Mannoheptulose – No inhibition N–Acetylglucosamine – No inhibition Glucosamine – No inhibition ADP – No inhibition Fructose – 25.2±6.5 HK1 Mannoheptulose 20.5±5.1 – N–Acetylglucosamine – – Glucosamine 79.8±6.7 – ADP No inhibition – Fructose – – NC–HK Mannoheptulose 0.47±0.02 0.08±0.01 N–Acetylglucosamine 0.49±0.02 0.15±0.02 Glucosamine 0.83±0.06 0.41±0.01 ADP 0.03±0.01 0.46±0.12 Fructose – No inhibition Enzyme preparationsa Inhibitors Kib (mM) Glucose as substrate Fructose as substrate FK1 Mannoheptulose – No inhibition N–Acetylglucosamine – No inhibition Glucosamine – No inhibition ADP – No inhibition Fructose – 2.3±0.7 FK2 Mannoheptulose – No inhibition N–Acetylglucosamine – No inhibition Glucosamine – No inhibition ADP – No inhibition Fructose – 25.2±6.5 HK1 Mannoheptulose 20.5±5.1 – N–Acetylglucosamine – – Glucosamine 79.8±6.7 – ADP No inhibition – Fructose – – NC–HK Mannoheptulose 0.47±0.02 0.08±0.01 N–Acetylglucosamine 0.49±0.02 0.15±0.02 Glucosamine 0.83±0.06 0.41±0.01 ADP 0.03±0.01 0.46±0.12 Fructose – No inhibition aThe enzyme preparations were obtained as described in Table 1. bKi values were calculated as described in Materials and methods. The values represent mean ±SE of at least three different preparations. The symbol (–) mean that the assay was not performed under that condition. No inhibition refers to lack of inhibition up to 300 mM of each hexose analogue, 500 μM ADP or 300 mM fructose or glucose tested for inhibition. Open in new tab Discussion Localization of fructokinases and hexokinases in subcellular fractions of seedling maize roots At least two soluble cytosolic fructokinases (FK1, FK2) were detected in seedling maize roots (Figs 1, 6). A large portion of the total fructose phosphorylation occurred by cytosolic fructokinase activity which could be inhibited by high fructose concentration, similar to the results of others (Doehlert, 1990; Renz et al., 1993) (Fig. 6A). However, it was not possible to inhibit fructose phosphorylation in non‐cytosolic membrane fractions with the same technique (Fig. 6C). The preferential cytosolic localization of the fructokinases is possibly involved in the phosphorylation of fructose derived from sucrose by either the invertase or sucrose‐synthase enzymes. In contrast, the hexokinase activity in seedling maize roots is distributed between cytosolic and non‐cytosolic fractions (Figs 1, 2, 3). Here it is shown that a substantial portion (∼30%) of the non‐cytosolic activity is associated with the Golgi apparatus and other cellular membranes of maize roots (Figs 2, 3B). In mammalian tissues it has been demonstrated that Golgi‐glucokinase facilitates the biosynthesis of UDP‐glucose (Berthillier et al., 1973; Berthillier and Got, 1974; Iijima and Awazi, 1972). It has also been found that NC‐HK is coupled to UDP‐glucose formation in maize roots (Figs 4, 6C; Galina and da‐Silva, 2000). It may be that NC‐HK is involved in glycosylation reactions in the Golgi apparatus, and ADP plays a critical role modulating its activity here and on the mitochondria. The location of hexokinases in Golgi and mitochondrial membranes suggests an interaction between these organelles (Morré, 1964). The kinetic constants of fructokinases and hexokinases The kinetic constants revealed that all hexokinase isoforms tested phosphorylate their sugar substrates more readily with ATP than with other nucleotides. A very high catalytic efficiency with ATP was observed for NC‐HK (Table 1). In maize roots, no FK with a high specificity for UTP was found, such as the FK‐0 which was described in maize endosperm (Doehlert, 1990) and suggested to take part in the cycling of UTP during sucrose degradation by sucrose synthase and FK (Huber and Akazawa, 1986). However, it was shown in maize root tips (Zeng et al., 1999) that anoxia favours sucrose cleavage via sucrose synthase. It would be of interest to know whether the FK‐0 is present in maize roots under anoxic conditions. Substrate inhibition of the FK1 and FK2 fractions resembles that described for several plant FK sources. However, with fructose as substrate, FK1 exhibited a strong co‐operativity (Hill n=2.5) and a much lower Ki for fructose than FK2 (Fig. 6A, filled triangles; Table 2). This is the first kinetic evidence that the fructose phosphorylation rate may be controlled allosterically by variations in cytosolic fructose. At low fructose levels, the co‐operative activation of FK1 would increase the phosphorylation rate sharply in response to small increases in fructose. At fructose concentrations above 1.5 mM, inhibition of FK1 could be a mechanism to prevent trapping Pi and depleting ATP due to a high rate of fructose phosphorylation uncoupled from the demand for fructose carbons through glycolysis (Teusink et al., 1998). The cytosolic HK1 seems not to be regulated by glucose and fructose levels (Fig. 6B). The HK1 may be involved in maintaining the cytosolic fructose phosphorylations at low rates, even in the presence of high cytosolic fructose levels (see below). HK inhibitors impair phosphorylation of hexoses by non‐cytosolic hexokinase In plants, has been shown that it is not the uptake of hexoses into the cell, but rather their entry into metabolism through phosphorylation by hexokinase that triggers a broad spectrum of gene repression, a phenomena known as sugar‐sensing (Graham et al., 1994; Jang and Sheen, 1994; Jang et al., 1997; Pego et al., 1999; Smeekens, 1998; Sheen et al., 1999). One important finding establishing the role of hexokinase as sensor was the fact that addition of competitive inhibitors of hexose binding such as mannoheptulose, N‐acetylglucosamine or glucosamine, relieved the gene repressed by hexoses (Jang and Sheen, 1994; Yamaguchi et al., 1997; Pego et al., 1999). The results shown in this study give the first kinetic evidence that the sugar‐sensing cascade may occur through NC‐HK bound to mitochondria, Golgi, plasmalemma or internal membranes in maize roots (Figs 3, 4; Table 2). All of the NC‐HK bound to mitochondria (∼60%), Golgi vesicles (∼30%) and the microsomal fraction (∼10%) are inhibited by HK inhibitors, including ADP; but most of the cytosolic isoforms are not (Figs 3B, 4, 5; see also Galina et al., 1995; Galina and da‐Silva, 2000). The very modest inhibition of cytosolic FK and HK by mannoheptulose, N‐acetylglucosamine and glucosamine suggests a high degree of sugar stereo‐selectivity of the catalytic sites of the cytosolic enzymes. Similar results were observed with cytosolic glucokinase purified from young tomato fruit, which was inhibited by only 26% with 100 mM mannoheptulose (with 0.4 mM glucose) (Martinez‐Barajas and Randall, 1998). In recent work with rice embryos (Guglielminetti et al., 2000), it was observed that two isoforms of HK (HK1 and HK2) and one of glucokinase (GK3) were inhibited by the glucose analogues, mannoheptulose and glucosamine. It was hypothesized that these isoforms are involved in the sugar‐sensing process. Interestingly, the subcellular fraction employed in rice embryo studies was the 15 000 g supernatant fraction, which contains Golgi vesicles, microsomes and soluble enzymes. Here it is shown that this fraction in maize roots contains NC‐HK that is inhibited by these glucose analogues. Some caution is required when correlating glucose analogue inhibition to the sugar‐sensing process, because the NC‐HK may require the presence of some signal transduction factor anchored to the same membrane (Koch et al., 2000). Indirect evidence for a distinct subcellular site of NC‐HK‐mediated sugar‐sensing comes from transgenic tobacco leaf cells studies (Herbers et al., 1996). The expression of yeast invertase in apoplasts or vacuoles leads to elevated concentrations of glucose and fructose which are sensed in plants expressing invertase, resulting in altered gene expression and leaf lesions. These effects were not observed when invertase was expressed in the cytosol. It was proposed that hexoses are sensed only in secretory membrane system of endoplasmic reticulum or Golgi apparatus (Herbers et al., 1996). Based on these results and the current paradigm that most of the hexokinase is a glycolytic and cytosolic enzyme, the role of hexokinase in sugar‐sensing has been questioned (Halford et al., 1999). The results of this study indicate that in maize, HK inhibitors preferentially inhibit the mitochondrial, microsomal and Golgi‐bound hexokinases and have very little effect on the cytosolic hexokinase and fructokinases (Figs 4, 5, 7; Table 2). It was shown that Arabidopsis over‐expressing the product of Athxk 1 gene (HxK I) presents high glucose sensitivity (Jang et al., 1997). Recently, the association of a HxK I with chloroplast outer envelope membrane has been demonstrated in spinach leaves (Wiese et al., 1999). Spinach HxK I and corresponding cDNA from tobacco and potato are highly homologous to Arabidopsis HxK I and II, which also possess a hydrophobic N‐terminal membrane anchor. This N‐terminal seems to be important for association of HxK I with chloroplast envelope membranes (Wiese et al., 1999). A different hydrophobic N‐terminal segment is known to be critical for binding of the mammalian Type I hexokinase to porin located in outer membrane of mitochondria (Wilson, 1997). However, the molecular characteristics of the HK association with mitochondria and other internal membrane systems have not yet been established. The extent to which the Arabidopsis hexokinase resembles the hexokinases has been shown to be associated with mitochondria in maize roots (Galina et al., 1995, 1999) also remains to be determined. However, the affinity of glucose and fructose for AtHxK I over‐expressed in tomato plants (Dai et al., 1999) showed a very similar profile to those described for NC‐HK in this paper (Fig. 6C). Based on the HK inhibitors as markers of the sugar‐sensing process, the data presented in this report suggest that the sugar‐sensing hexokinase is not cytosolic in maize roots. Recently, evidence was given for an interface between transduction pathways of hexose and energy charge signals (Koch et al., 2000). It would be of interest to evaluate which signal transduction elements are associated with mitochondrial/Golgi‐apparatus membranes and how ADP (a natural HK regulator) modulates the hexose sensor activity of maize non‐cytosolic hexokinases. Fig. 7. Open in new tabDownload slide Hypothetical model of subcellular organization and short‐term (kinetic) adaptive responses of the hexose‐phosphorylating potential to variations in hexose and adenylate energy charge levels in maize root cells. In maize root cells bathed with high hexose concentrations and in normoxia (low ADP), after passage through monosaccharide transporter, the glucose and fructose phosphorylation by soluble HK1(▪), FK2(▴) and membrane associated hexokinases NC‐HK(blast symbol) represents the major source of hexose 6‐phosphate for glycolysis and UDP‐Glc synthesis (A). An increased rate of cytosolic fructose phosphorylation by soluble FK1(black ellipse) and FK2(▴) paralleled with a decreased rate of fructose phosphorylation by NC‐HK represents an early response to low hexose levels in normoxic states (B). With the decrease in aerobic‐oxidative mitochondrial activity due to a hypoxic state, adenylate energy charge is shifted and the ADP concentration becomes high. At hypoxic state and high hexose levels, the fructose phosphorylation is carried out at low rates in part by fructose‐inhibited cytosolic FK1 and FK2 and by ADP‐inhibited NC‐HK. The glucose phosphorylation is sustained by soluble HK1 and very low rate of UDP‐Glc formation occurs by ADP‐inhibited NC‐HK (Galina and da‐Silva, 2000) (C). An increased rate of cytosolic fructose phosphorylation by soluble FK1 and FK2 represent early response to low hexose levels in hypoxic states (D). The suggested enzyme activities is indicated by arrows: (solid arrow) maximal rate; (dotted arrow) low rate; and (dotted break arrow) very low rate. None of the cytosolic enzyme forms is significantly inhibited by ADP or glucose analogues. The hexose phosphorylations that take place close to mitochondria, Golgi‐endoplasmic reticulum or plasmalemma are under tight control by ADP and are inhibited by glucose analogues mannoheptulose, N‐acetylglucosamine and glucosamine. Hexose sensing is proposed to be mediated by membrane associated hexokinases (NC‐HK). Subcellular organization of the hexose‐phosphorylation diversity in maize seedlings Based on the data presented in this report and the current knowledge of plant carbohydrate translocation, an integrative model is proposed for subcellular organization and the short‐term (kinetic) adaptive responses of the hexose‐phosphorylating potential to variations in hexose and adenylate energy‐charge levels in maize root cells (Fig. 7). In maize root axis, the sugar concentration varies from 500 mM in the phloem to less than 5 mM in the root tips (Bret‐Harte and Silk, 1994; Dieuaide‐Noubhani et al., 1995). At extremely low hexose levels (up to 1 mM), either FK1, FK2 or HK1 would phosphorylate glucose and fructose at their maximal rates (Figs 6A, B, 7B, D). Under this condition, NC‐HK would function as a ‘glucokinase‐like’ enzyme with a tight regulation by ADP (Figs 4C, 6C, 7B, D). At high hexose levels (>20 mM) the cytosolic FK2 activity would be reduced to 20% and FK1 completely blocked (Figs 6A, 7A, C). The fructose phosphorylations would be carried out only by the NC‐HK and, at low rate, by the HK1 (Fig. 6B, C), with very little control from ADP (Figs 4C, 7A, C; Galina et al., 1999). The glucose phosphorylation catalysed by HK1 is unaffected by the adenylate charge (Figs 4C, 7A, C). In agreement with recent data (Galina and da‐Silva, 2000), neither ADP nor HK inhibitors have much effect on the cytosolic FK and HK activities. The lack of ADP inhibition suggests that cytosolic FK and HK are involved in the glycolysis (Givan, 1974; Farrar and Williams, 1991). A negative regulation by ADP was found with NC‐HK mediating the UDP‐glucose formation (Galina and da‐Silva, 2000) suggesting that these isoforms do not take part in the glycolytic pathway. 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +55 21 270 8647. E‐mail: galina@bioqmed.ufrj.br WSS is a recipient of a fellowship from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Brasil. GLR is a recipient of a fellowship from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. We are grateful to Martha Sorenson and Roger Seymour critically reading the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) proc. no. E‐26/170.713/99; Programa de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, PADCT‐CNPQ no. 620433/91‐4; (FINEP/PRONEX/FUJB) no. 76.97.1000.000. References Berthillier G, Dubois P, Got R. 1973 . Glucokinase microsomique du foie de rat. Localisation dans une fraction riche en appareil de Golgi. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 293, 370 –378. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Berthillier G, Got R. 1974 . Biosynthèse de l'UDPglucose par les microsomes des hépatocytes de rat. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 362, 390 –402. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Board M, Colquhoun A, Newsholme EA. 1995 . High Km glucose‐phosphorylating (glucokinase) activities in a range of tumor cell lines and inhibition of rates of tumor growth by the specific enzyme inhibitor mannoheptulose. Cancer Research 55, 3278 –3285. Google Scholar Borchert S, Harborth J, Schünemann D, Hoferichter P, Heldt HW. 1993 . Studies of the enzymic capacities and transport properties of pea root plastids. Plant Physiology 101, 303 –312. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Bret‐Harte MS, Silk WK. 1994 . Non‐vascular, symplasmic diffusion of sucrose cannot satisfy the carbon demands of growth in the primary root tip of Zea mays L. Plant Physiology 105, 19 –33. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Dai N, Schaffer AA, Petreikov M, Granot D. 1995 . Arabidopsis thaliana hexokinase cDNA isolated by complementation of yeast cells. Plant Physiology 108, 879 –880. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Dai N, Schaffer AA, Petreikov M, Shahak Y, Giller Y, Ratner K, Levine A, Granot D. 1999 . Overexpression of Arabidopsis hexokinase in tomato plants inhibits growth, reduces photosynthesis and induces rapid senescence. The Plant Cell 11, 1253 –1266. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Dieuaide‐Noubhani M, Raffard G, Canioni P, Pradet A, Raymond P. 1995 . Quantification of compartmented metabolic fluxes in maize root tips using isotope distribution from 13C‐ or 14C‐labeled glucose. Journal of Biological Chemistry 270, 13147 –13159. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Doehlert DC. 1990 . Fructokinases from developing maize kernels differ in their specificity for nucleoside triphosphates. Plant Physiology 93, 353 –355. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Douce R, Christensen EL, Bonner Jr WD. 1972 . Preparation of intact plant mitochondria. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 275, 148 –160. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Dunwell JM. 2000 . Transgenic approaches to crop improvement. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, Special Issue, 487 –496. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Echeverria E, Boyer CD, Thomas PA, Shannon JC. 1988 . Enzyme activities associated with maize kernel amyloplasts. Plant Physiology 86, 786 –792. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Farrar J, Williams JHH. 1991 . Control of the rate of respiration in roots: compartmentation, demand and the supply of substrate. In: Emes M, ed. Compartmentation of metabolism . Butterworths, 167 –188. Google Scholar Fiske CF, Subbarow Y. 1925 . The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. Journal of Biological Chemistry 66, 375 –400. Google Scholar Galina A, da‐Silva WS. 2000 . Hexokinase activity alters sugar‐nucleotide formation in maize root homogenates. Phytochemistry 53, 29 –37. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Galina A, Logullo C, Souza EF, Rezende GL, da‐Silva WS. 1999 . Sugar phosphorylation modulates ADP inhibition of maize mitochondrial hexokinase. Physiologia Plantarum 105, 17 –23. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Galina A, Reis M, Albuquerque MC, Puyou AG, Puyou MT, de Meis L. 1995 . Different properties of the mitochondrial and cytosolic hexokinases in maize roots. Biochemical Journal 309, 105 –112. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Givan CV. 1974 . Regulation of glycoysis by adenosine diphosphate in Pisum sativum. Phytochemistry 13, 1741 –1745. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Graham IA, Denby KJ, Leaver CJ. 1994 . Carbon catabolite repression regulates glyoxylate cycle gene expression in cucumber. The Plant Cell 6, 761 –772. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Guglielminetti L, Perata P, Morita A, Loreti E, Yamaguchi J, Alpi A. 2000 . Characterization of isoforms of hexose kinases in rice embryo. Phytochemistry 53, 195 –200. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Halford NG, Purcell PC, Hardie DG. 1999 . Is hexokinase really a sugar sensor in plants? Trends in Plant Science 4, 117 –120. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Herbers K, Meuwly P, Frommer WB, Métraux J‐P, Sonnewald U. 1996 . Systemic acquired resistance mediated by the ectopic expression of invertase: possible hexose sensing in the secretory pathway. The Plant Cell 8, 793 –803. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Hooks MA, Shearer GC, Roberts JKM. 1994 . Nucleotide availability in maize (Zea mays L.) root tips. Plant Physiology 104, 581 –589. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Huber SC, Akazawa T. 1986 . A novel sucrose synthase pathway for sucrose degradation in cultured sycamore cells. Plant Physiology 81, 1008 –1013. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Iijima K, Awazi N. 1972 . Histochemical studies on the morphology of the Golgi apparatus and on distribution of hexokinase and some enzymes concerning vitamin C synthesis in substantia nigra of the rabbit. Acta Histochimica 44, 122 –136. Google Scholar Jang J‐C, León P, Zhou L, Sheen J. 1997 . Hexokinase as a sugar sensor in higher plants. The Plant Cell 9, 5 –19. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Jang J‐C, Sheen J. 1994 . Sugar sensing in higher plants. The Plant Cell 6, 1665 –1679. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Koch KE. 1996 . Carbohydrate‐modulated gene expression in plants. Annual Reviews of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 47, 509 –540. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Koch KE, Ying Z, Wu Y, Avigne WT. 2000 . Multiple paths of sugar‐sensing and a sugar/oxygen overlap for genes of sucrose and ethanol metabolism. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, Special issue, 417 –427. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Malaisse WJ. 1998 . Monosaccharide esters: new tools in biomedical research. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 65, 129 –142. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Martinez‐Barajas E, Randall DD. 1998 . Purification and characterization of a glucokinase from young tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L. Mill.) fruit. Planta 205, 567 –573. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Morré DJ. 1964 . Isolation of the Golgi apparatus from plant cells. Journal of Cell Biology 23, 295 –305. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Morré DJ. 1971 . Isolation of Golgi apparatus. Methods in Enzymology 22, 130 –148. Google Scholar Nagahashi J, Kane AP. 1982 . Triton‐stimulated nucleoside diphosphatase activity: Subcellular localization in corn root homogenates. Protoplasma 112, 167 –173. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Pego JV, Weisbeek PJ, Smeekens S. 1999 . Mannose inhibits Arabidopsis germination via a hexokinase‐medited step. Plant Physiology 119, 1017 –1023. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Renz A, Merlo L, Stitt M. 1993 . Partial purification from potato tubers of three fructokinases and three hexokinases which show differing organ and developmental specificity. Planta 190, 156 –165. Google Scholar Sheen J, Zhou L, Jang J‐C. 1999 . Sugars as signaling molecules. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2, 410 –418. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Smeekens S. 1998 . Sugar regulation of gene expression in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 1, 230 –234. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Smith SB, Taylor MA, Burch LR, Davies HV. 1993 . Primary structure and characterization of a cDNA clone of fructokinase from potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Record). Plant Physiology 102, 95 –106. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Taylor CB. 1997 . Sweet sensations. The Plant Cell 9, 1 –4. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Teusink B, Walsh MC, Dam KV, Westerhoff HV. 1998 . The danger of metabolic pathways with turbo design. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 23, 161 –166. Google Scholar Umemura T, Perata P, Futsuhara Y, Yamaguchi J. 1998 . Sugar sensing and α‐amylase gene repression in rice embryos. Planta 204, 420 –428. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Wiese A, Gröner F, Sonnewald U, Deppner H, Lerchl J, Hebbeker U, Flügge U‐I, Weber A. 1999 . Spinach hexokinase I is located in the outer envelope membrane of plastids. Federation of European Biochemical Societies Letters 461, 13 –18. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Widell S, Larsson C. 1990 . A critical evaluation of markers used in plasma membrane purification. In: Larsson C, Moller IM, eds. The plant plasma membrane: structure, function and molecular biology . Springer‐Verlag, 147 –159. Google Scholar Wilson JE. 1997 . Homologous and heterologous interactions between hexokinase and mitochondrial porin: evolutionary implications. Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes 29, 97 –102. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Xu LZ, Weber IT, Harrison RW, Gidh‐Jain M, Pilkis SJ. 1995 . Sugar specificity of human β‐cell glucokinase: correlation of molecular models with kinetic measurements. Biochemistry 34, 6083 –6092. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Yamaguchi J, Umemura T‐A, Futsuhara Y, Perata P. 1997 . Sugar sensing and alpha‐amylase gene repression in rice embryos. Plant Physiology 114s, 46 . Google Scholar Zeng Y, Wu Y, Avigne WT, Koch KE. 1999 . Rapid repression of maize invertases by low oxygen. Invertase/sucrose synthase balance, sugar signaling potential and seedling survival. Plant Physiology 121, 599 –608. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS © Society for Experimental Biology © Society for Experimental Biology http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Experimental Botany Oxford University Press

Subcellular distribution and kinetic properties of cytosolic and non‐cytosolic hexokinases in maize seedling roots: implications for hexose phosphorylation

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/cell-and-molecular-biology-biochemistry-and-molecular-physiology-fg6nWg0kym

References (45)

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 Society for Experimental Biology
ISSN
0022-0957
eISSN
1460-2431
DOI
10.1093/jexbot/52.359.1191
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract Hexose phosphorylation by hexokinases plays an important role in glycolysis, biosynthesis and control of sugar‐modulated genes. Several cytosolic hexokinase and fructokinase isoforms have been characterized and organelle‐bound hexokinases have also been detected in higher plants. In this study a hexokinase activity is described that is inhibited by ADP (Ki=30 μM) and mannoheptulose (Ki≅300 μM) in non‐cytosolic fractions (mitochondria, Golgi apparatus and microsomes) obtained from preparations of seedling roots of maize (Zea mays L.). The catalytic efficiency (Vmax/Km) for both ATP and glucose in all non‐cytosolic hexokinase fractions is more than one order of magnitude higher than that of cytosolic hexokinase and fructokinases. Low (30%) or no ADP and mannoheptulose inhibition is observed with hexokinase and fructokinase activities derived from the cytosolic compartment obtained after ion exchange and affinity chromatography. The soluble fructokinase (FK) shows fructose cooperativity (Hill n>2). The Vmax/Km ratio is about 3‐fold higher for ATP than for other NTPs and no difference for hexose phosphorylation efficiencies is found between cytosolic hexokinase and fructokinase isoforms (FK1, FK2) with ATP as substrate. The Ki for fructose inhibition is 2 mM for FK1 and 25 mM for FK2. The data indicate that low energy‐charge and glucose analogues preferentially inhibit the membrane‐bound hexokinases possibly involved in sugar‐sensing, but not the cytosolic hexokinases and fructokinases. Non‐cytosolic hexokinase, fructokinase, hexose‐phosphorylation, glucose analogues, Zea mays L. Introduction Hexokinase [EC 2.7.1.1] catalyses the ATP‐dependent conversion of hexoses to hexose‐6‐phosphate and ADP. Several hexokinases with tissue specificity or developmentally regulated expression have been described in plants (Renz et al., 1993; Galina et al., 1995). Different genes encoding hexokinases (Dai et al., 1995; Jang et al., 1997) and a fructokinase (Smith et al., 1993) have been cloned. From the viewpoint of metabolic flux, the hexokinase reaction plays a key role in the removal of free hexoses from the cytosol, channelling the carbons to either glycolysis or biosynthesis, depending on cellular demands. In previous studies, two hexokinases were distinguished by different sensitivities to ADP and different subcellular locations in maize roots (Galina et al., 1995, 1999). The mitochondria‐bound hexokinase has a higher affinity for glucose than for fructose and is strongly inhibited by ADP (Ki=20–40 μM). The inhibition is non‐competitive with respect to both ATP and glucose. High cytoplasmic ADP concentrations (∼200 μM) are found in maize roots during hypoxia (Hooks et al., 1994), indicating a low mitochondrial hexokinase activity under this condition. In contrast, the soluble hexokinase is not inhibited by ADP concentrations up to 1 mM (Galina et al., 1995), a kinetic property that is compatible with its glycolytic role. Recently, using [U‐14C]‐glucose as an isotopic tracer, it was found that non‐cytosolic hexokinase forms the precursors that are essential for conversion of glucose to NDP‐5′‐sugar in maize root homogenates (Galina and da‐Silva, 2000). A surprising finding was that ADP and mannoheptulose block NDP‐5′‐sugar formation, although they do not impair the formation of cytosolic glucose‐6‐phosphate. These results indicate that the non‐cytosolic hexokinase is not engaged in glycolysis. Mannoheptulose, a specific hexokinase inhibitor, has little effect on the cytosolic glucose phosphorylation (Galina and da‐Silva, 2000). Several sugar hexokinase inhibitors such as mannoheptulose, N‐acetylglucosamine and glucosamine have been widely used as experimental tools, for example, to determine catalytic site structure of glucokinases and hexokinases or to inhibit carbohydrate metabolism in many cell types (Jang and Sheen, 1994; Xu et al., 1995; Board et al., 1995; Malaisse, 1998). In plants these investigations are scarce, in part due to a small number of isolated hexokinase isoforms. Only in the past few years has the existence of sugar‐regulated gene expression in plants become apparent, based on a molecular genetic approach (Dai et al., 1999; Graham et al., 1994; Jang et al., 1997; Koch, 1996). Of crucial importance in these studies was the observation that specific hexokinase inhibitors, such as mannoheptulose and glucosamine, block glucose repression in plant cells (Jang and Sheen, 1994; Umemura et al., 1998). Although hexokinase is commonly known as a glycolytic enzyme, it has been implicated as a glucose sensor that mediates the repression of genes involved in photosynthesis, the glyoxylate cycle and synthesis of α‐amylase (Jang and Sheen, 1994; Graham et al., 1994; Umemura et al., 1998). This property may have potential interest as a target for manipulation and modification of hexokinases for crop improvement (Dunwell, 2000). As pointed out by Taylor (Taylor, 1997; see also Umemura et al., 1998), knowledge of the subcellular distribution of hexokinases in plants may help to elucidate the components in the signal transduction pathways triggered by hexokinase phosphorylation of fructose and glucose. The properties of ADP regulation are different between soluble and particulate hexokinase fractions (Galina et al., 1995). The aim of this study was to investigate the localization of hexokinases by differential centrifugation and to correlate their subcellular distribution with their sensitivity to glucose analogue inhibitors and their steady‐state kinetic properties. All hexokinase activities measured in 10000 and 100000 g pellet fractions are defined as non‐cytosolic hexokinases (NC‐HK) in order to distinguish them from the cytosolic soluble fractions FK1, FK2 and HK1. Most of the NC‐HK activity is bound to mitochondria (Galina et al., 1995, 1999), and resides in submitochondrial particle membranes (SMP). Although, in pea roots, it was found that 16% of HK activity was associated with plastids (Borchert et al., 1993), in maize roots, this activity corresponds to only 5% of the total, as estimated by the plastidic markers ADP‐Glc pyrophosphorylase and triose phosphate isomerase (Galina et al., 1995; Galina and da‐Silva, 2000). Non‐cytosolic hexokinase activity is also not detectable in amyloplast preparations derived from developing corn endosperm (Echeverria et al., 1988). The results of this study show that ADP and hexokinase inhibitors preferentially affect the phosphorylation of fructose and glucose in mitochondria and Golgi‐vesicle preparations, with little or no effect on cytosolic hexokinase activities. Materials and methods Preparation of plant material and isolation of cell fractions Maize seeds (Zea mays L.) were surface‐sterilized with sodium hypochlorite (∼10 min in a 3% solution) and then washed with sterile water. Radicles were harvested from seeds allowed to germinate for 3–4 d on wet filter paper in the dark at 28 °C. Root homogenates and submitochondrial particles were obtained as previously described (Galina et al., 1995) using a cold extraction buffer (buffer A) containing: 5 mM HEPES/TRIS pH 7.4, 0.3 M sucrose, 7 mM cysteine, 1 mM EGTA, and 1 mM PMSF. The crude mitochondrial pellet was obtained from the first centrifugation (10000 g for 12 min). The supernatant of the first 10000 g centrifugation (cytosolic supernatant) was used for cytosolic HK assays. The cytosolic fraction was then centrifuged for 100000 g for 50 min, the pellet (microsomes) was stored and the supernatant (soluble proteins) was used to obtain soluble FK and HK. Discontinuous sucrose gradient Washed mitochondria (1.2 ml samples; 50–60 mg of protein) were resuspended in buffer A, added to a discontinuous sucrose gradient and centrifuged in a swinging bucket rotor (Beckman SW 27) for 45 min at 40 000 g (Douce et al., 1972). The gradients were prepared by layering sucrose solutions into a centrifuge tube in the following sequence: 1.5 M (2 ml), 1.2 M (2 ml), 0.9 M (2 ml), and 0.6 M (2 ml). Following centrifugation six main bands were obtained: B1 (∼ 2 ml of 0.6 M), B2 (interface of 0.6 and 0.9 M), B3 (∼ 2 ml of 0.9 M), B4 (interface of 0.9 and 1.2 M), B5 (∼ 2 ml of 1.2 M) and B6 (interface of 1.2 and 1.5 M). The sucrose gradient separates the Golgi vesicles and mitochondria. For some experiments, Golgi vesicles (bands B1 to B2) were further diluted to 0.5 M sucrose and purified by flotation centrifugation as described earlier (Morré, 1971). Partial purification of cytosolic fructokinases and hexokinase The soluble proteins were fractionated by the addition of solid (NH4)2SO4. The precipitate formed at 50% salt saturation (31.3 g added to 100 ml of final volume) was centrifuged (30 000 g, 15 min) and discarded. The salt saturation of the supernatant was raised to 60% (adding 6.6 g to 100 ml) and the precipitate was centrifuged and dissolved in 3 ml buffer B (like buffer A, but without sucrose and with 20 mM TRIS‐HCl instead of HEPES/TRIS). The supernatant concentration was raised to 70% salt saturation (adding 6.9 g to 100 ml) and the precipitate was centrifuged and dissolved in 3 ml buffer B. After (NH4)2SO4 precipitation each fraction (60% and 70% saturation) was separated from contaminating proteins with a DEAE‐Toyopearl column (21.6×1.2 cm). With 1 mM fructose as substrate, only one peak of activity was detected in the 60% fraction (FK1) and there was no glucose phosphorylation activity present. The 70% fraction had both fructose and glucose phosphorylation activities (FK2, HK1). The proteins bound to the column were eluted with a linear salt gradient from 0 to 0.4 M NaCl. An attempt was made to further separate the glucose and fructose activities by affinity chromatography (Renz et al., 1993) to determine if they were due to one or two enzymes. The method involved a Cibacron‐Blue 3GA (Sigma) column (4×1.5 cm) and elution with 0–3 mM ATP. The three enzymes were characterized kinetically. Assay of hexokinase activity Each fraction was assayed for hexokinase activity in a medium containing 20 mM TRIS‐HCl pH 7.5, 6 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ATP, 2 mM phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), 10 units ml−1 pyruvate kinase, 0.1% (v/v) Triton X‐100, 5 mM NaN3, 5 mM NaF, 0.1 mM P1,P5‐diadenosine‐5′‐pentaphosphate, and the appropriate glucose or fructose concentrations. When ADP was studied, the pyruvate kinase was omitted from the medium. Assays were initiated with ATP or by adding protein fractions (20–120 μg protein ml−1) and were quenched after 5–10 min at 30 °C by heating (1 min at 100 °C). The glucose‐6‐phosphate formed was measured by adding an equal volume of a solution containing 20 mM TRIS‐HCl pH 7.5, 6 mM MgCl2, 0.7 units ml−1 glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase (Leuconostoc mesenteroids) (Sigma Chemical Co.) and 0.3 mM β‐NAD+. For fructose‐6‐phosphate determination 3.5 units ml−1 phosphoglucoseisomerase were included in the assay medium. In continuous spectrophotometric assays the hexose‐6‐phosphate production was coupled with glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase and NAD reduction, by measuring the increase in A340. In all cases, activities were linear with the amount of protein added. Kinetic constants were calculated from Woolf–Augustinsson–Hofstee (v versus v/[S]) replots of kinetic data and by non‐linear regression analysis applied to the Michaelis–Menten or Hill equations using the program ENZFITTER. Ki values were calculated from Dixon (1/v versus [I]) plots. ADP quantification in homogenates and cytosolic fractions In the experiments where the ADP inhibition was tested during hexokinase activity assay, the ADP concentration was checked in order to evaluate the degree of its consumption by potential side‐reactions in the homogenate and cytosolic fractions. An aliquot of 150 μl was removed and boiled from the reaction mixture at the beginning and at the end of the assay. After centrifugation at 5000 g for 15 min, 100 μl of the supernatant was removed and the ADP was quantified by the addition of 400 μl of a medium containing: 20 mM TRIS‐HCl pH 7.5, 6 mM MgCl2, 2 mM PEP, 10 units ml−1 lactate dehydrogenase, 7 units ml−1 pyruvate kinase (rabbit muscle) (Sigma Chemical Co.), and 0.5 mM β‐NADH. The decrease in the absorbance at 340 nm was proportional to the amount of ADP. Other enzyme assays The UDPase activity, a Golgi marker enzyme (Widell and Larsson, 1990), was measured as previously described (Nagahashi and Kane, 1982). Membranes (10–100 μl) were added to 0.9 ml of assay buffer containing 30 mM MOPS‐TRIS, pH 6.5, 1 mM UDP and 2 mM MnSO4. Duplicate tubes with 0.02% (v/v) Triton X‐100 were prepared. The reaction was incubated at 35 °C for 20 min. Released Pi was determined according to Fiske and Subbarow (Fiske and Subbarow, 1925). Triton‐activated UDPase activity, referred to as latent UDPase activity, increased linearly with time. The mitochondrial ATPase activity was determined by measuring the release of Pi from ATP in the absence and presence of 5 mM NaN3 and 2 μg ml−1 oligomycin in a reaction medium containing 50 mM TRIS‐HCl (pH 8.0), 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ATP, and 5 μM FCCP. The difference between these activities is referred to as the azide‐sensitive ATPase activity and is related to the maize FoF1ATPase complex (Galina et al., 1995). Results Partial isolation of cytosolic fructokinases and hexokinase The 70% (NH4)2SO4 saturation fraction that was obtained from soluble proteins was resolved by ion exchange chromotography (Fig. 1). One peak, that was able to phosphorylate fructose but not glucose, was detected in the unbound protein fractions of the column (FK2). Another peak of activity was detected between 0.17 and 0.34 M of the NaCl gradient. This peak of activity phosphorylated both glucose and fructose (HK1). The affinity chromatography procedure was unable to separate these activities further so it is concluded that the activity resulted from a single enzyme. Fig. 1. Open in new tabDownload slide Separation by ion exchange chromatography of soluble fructokinase and hexokinase. The 70% ammonium sulphate saturation fraction from soluble extracts was partially purified by and ion‐exchange chromatography as described in Materials and methods. Samples of 50 μl from eluted fractions were assayed using 0.8 mM glucose (closed circles) or 0.8 mM fructose (open triangles) as substrate. Protein was measured at 280 nm (dot line). The assay temperature was 25 °C. The reaction was started by addition of 1 mM ATP. Localization of hexokinases in subcellular fractions of maize roots Inhibition of the hexokinase activity by ADP and mannoheptulose was tested in two major fractions obtained after homogenate centrifugation (Fig. 2). Mannoheptulose (30 mM) and ADP (250 μM) inhibited the activity by 50% in crude homogenates (Fig. 2A). However, with the cytosolic fraction, ADP had no effect and mannoheptulose caused a small inhibition (about 20%) (Fig. 2B). The ADP concentration was not significantly decreased by side‐reactions in the homogenate and cytosolic fractions. The ADP measured at the final of reaction time was 266±3 μM (n=3). An almost total inhibition was observed with either ADP or mannoheptulose in the pellet fraction obtained after a 10000 g centrifugation (Fig. 2C). The cytosolic supernatant (100000 g) (Fig. 2B) and pellet (10000 g) (Fig. 2C) fractions were fractionated further in Fig. 3. The total soluble glucose and fructose phosphorylating activities obtained after centrifugation at 100000 g (S100, Fig. 3A) were fractionated sequentially by addition of (NH4)2SO4. It became apparent that, when 0.8 mM glucose or fructose was the substrate in the assays, more fructose than glucose was phosphorylated (∼70% of the total), especially when the (NH4)2SO4 saturation was between 50% and 70% (Fig. 3A, black bars). The glucose phosphorylated was about one‐half of the fructose phosphorylated. Although the soluble activity measured with glucose was present in all (NH4)2SO4 fractions, it was more evident between 60% and 80% of (NH4)2SO4 saturation (Fig. 3A, grey bars). This result suggests the presence of distinct hexokinase and fructokinase activities in the cytosolic compartment. When the pellet (10000 g) fraction (Fig. 2C) was further separated on a sucrose gradient, it revealed non‐cytosolic hexokinase (NC‐HK) activity in distinct organelles (Fig. 3B). Five major bands from the sucrose gradient were assayed. The Golgi marker (UDPase) was concentrated in bands 1 and 2, while mitochondrial marker (FoF1ATPase) predominated in bands 4, 5, and 6. The NC‐HK activity appeared to be associated with both mitochondria and Golgi membranes. In addition to a large fraction of total NC‐HK activity detected in band 6, where FoF1ATPase predominates, Golgi vesicles isolated from lighter bands by flotation centrifugation as described previously (Morré, 1971) also exhibited high specific activity of hexokinase, totally inhibited by mannoheptulose and ADP (data not shown). The hexokinase specific activities for different non‐cytosolic fractions (mean ±s.e.) were: microsomes 0.014±0.006 (n=4), crude mitochondria 0.082±0.023 (n=7), washed mitochondria 0.18±0.05 (n=5), Golgi vesicles (Morré, 1971) 0.53±0.14 (n=3), and SMP preparations 1.31±0.32 (n=3) μmol min−1 mg−1. With this method of preparing Golgi vesicles, mitochondrial contamination is reduced to ∼13%. Fig. 2. Open in new tabDownload slide Subcellular distribution of maize root hexokinase.The hexokinase activity was measured in a continuous assay (see Materials and methods) in the presence of 0.8 mM glucose plus 10 units ml−1 pyruvate kinase (○); 30 mM mannoheptulose–MH (•) or 250 μM ADP without pyruvate kinase (▵). The reaction was started by the addition of 1 mM ATP (↓). The final protein concentration was: In (A) total homogenate, 0.12 mg ml−1; (B) soluble fraction (100 000 g supernatant), 0.1 mg ml−1; and (C) pellet fraction (10 000 g), 0.05 mg ml−1. Fig. 3. Open in new tabDownload slide Subfractionation of cytosolic and non‐cytosolic maize root hexokinases. The different soluble (A) fractions, 2 ml each, were obtained by precipitation by adding ammonium sulphate to S100 supernatant (Cytosol) as described in (Materials and methods). The specific activity with each sugar substrate (μmol mg−1 protein min−1) was multiplied by the total protein (mg) in each fraction and expressed as percentage of total hexose phosphorylation (the sum of total activity measured with 0.8 mM glucose=21.77 μmol min−1; and total activity measured with 0.8 mM fructose=48.81 μmol min−1). The total protein in S100 was 143 mg. The 100% of total hexoses phosphorylation activity in S100 was 70.6 μmol min−1. In (B) the specific activity with each substrate (μmol mg−1 protein min−1) was multiplied by the total protein (mg) in each band colected (2 ml) from sucrose gradient and expressed % of total activity measured in the pellet fraction (10 000 g). The UDPase and FoF1ATPase activities were started by adding protein from the pellet (10 000 g) or from each sucrose gradient band to the appropriate medium as described (see Materials and methods). The 100% values obtained in this way are: UDPase (empty bar)=0.58±0.11 μmol Pi min−1; FoF1ATPase (black bar)=1.39±0.47 μmol Pi min−1 and NC‐HK (gray bar)=14.9±3.3 μmol glucose‐6‐P min−1. The total protein in the pellet fraction was 182±51 mg. The values represent means ±SE of three different preparations. HK inhibitors impair phosphorylation of hexoses by non‐cytosolic hexokinase The activities of soluble cytosolic fructokinases and hexokinases that had been partially purified from the soluble fraction (Fig. 2B), were compared with that of the NC‐HK fraction (Fig. 4). Neither mannoheptulose nor N‐acetylglucosamine inhibited the cytosolic FK1 activity, even at a low fructose concentration (0.2 mM). The ability of mannoheptulose to inhibit phosphorylation of glucose by the cytosolic HK1 fraction was also very low: in the presence of 0.8 mM glucose the activity was reduced by ∼30% with 30 mM mannoheptulose (Fig. 5B). These results indicate that neither of the cytosolic hexokinases is greatly affected by a wide range of inhibitor concentrations. Similar results were observed with mannoheptulose using cytosolic glucokinase purified from young tomato fruit (Martinez‐Barajas and Randall, 1998). A significant inhibition occurred when the inhibitors were added to assays containing the NC‐HK fraction associated with SMPs (open symbols in Figs 4, 5A). The inhibition was observed with either fructose or glucose as substrate. The inhibition was practically abolished when the glucose concentration was raised from 0.8 mM to 20 mM, indicating a competitive inhibition (Fig. 5A). An increase in fructose concentration from 30 to 200 mM did not totally overcome the mannoheptulose inhibition, either with SMP or Golgi‐vesicle preparations (data not shown). In agreement with previous data (Galina et al., 1995), the NC‐HK was effectively inhibited by ADP when the substrate was glucose (Fig. 4C, open circles). However, when fructose was the substrate, the ADP inhibition is much lower (Fig. 4C, open triangles) (Galina et al., 1999). A small ADP inhibition was detected with FK1, FK2 and HK1 at higher ADP concentrations (Fig. 4C). Fig. 4. Open in new tabDownload slide Effects of sugar analogue inhibitors (A, B) and ADP (C) on soluble FK1, FK2 and HK1 and on NC‐HK. The activities were assayed as described in Materials and methods. The reactions were started by the addition of FK1 (▴, 0.1 mg ml−1), FK2 (▪, 0.12 mg ml−1), HK1 (•, 0.12 mg ml−1) or NC‐HK (○, ▵; submitochondrial particles, 0.05 mg ml−1). The concentrations of fructose were: (▴, ▪) 0.2 mM or (▵) 5 mM. The concentration of glucose was: (○, •) 0.2 mM. The 100% activities were: FK1 (▴)=0.83±0.12 μmol fructose‐6‐P min−1 mg−1; FK2 (▪)=0.71±0.09 μmol fructose‐6‐P min−1 mg−1; HK1 (•)=0.25±0.04 μmol glucose‐6‐P min−1 mg−1; NC‐HK: (○)=1.66±0.21 μmol glucose‐6‐P min−1 mg−1; or (▵)=1.21±0.18 μmol fructose‐6‐P min−1 mg−1. The specific activities values are mean ±SE of at least four independent measurements. Fig. 5. Open in new tabDownload slide Effect of mannoheptulose on non‐cytosolic (A) and cytosolic (B) hexokinases. The activities were assayed as described in Materials and methods and the legend to Fig. 4. The concentrations of glucose were: 0.8 mM (empty bars) or 20 mM (black bars). Kinetic properties of cytosolic and non‐cytosolic hexokinases The kinetic constants for the nucleotide‐5′‐triphosphate and hexose substrates of FK1, FK2, HK1, and NC‐HK are shown in Table 1. For FK1 and FK2, the Vmax values were practically the same for all NTP's. However, the NC‐HK showed a marked preference for ATP, with a Vmax ranging from 2.4–5.4‐fold higher with ATP than other NTPs. Thus, although all hexokinases analysed in this study utilized ATP most efficiently as a phosphoryl donor, based on the Vmax/Km ratio (Table 1, last column), the difference between ATP and the other NTPs was much greater for NC‐HK. This result suggests that cytosolic fructokinases may utilize other NTPs fairly readily. A comparison of the kinetic constants for glucose and fructose revealed that FK1 uses only fructose as substrate (Table 1; Fig. 6A). In addition, FK1 has a strong positive co‐operativity with respect to fructose for fructose phosphorylation, with a Hill coefficient for fructose greater than 2 (Fig. 6A, closed triangles). Despite the similarity of kinetic constants for phosphorylation of fructose by FK1 and FK2, the co‐operative behaviour was not observed for FK2 (Fig. 6A, open triangles). The Vmax of HK1 was 1.7 times higher with fructose (Fig. 6B, open circles) than that with glucose as substrate. Since the affinity of HK1 for both hexoses was practically the same, the HK1 has a catalytic efficiency higher when using fructose as substrate (Table 1). In contrast, NC‐HK exhibited a catalytic efficiency for glucose that was 84‐fold higher than for fructose as substrate (Fig. 6C; Table 1). The inhibitor constants (Ki) for different inhibitors of the soluble and membrane‐bound hexokinases are shown in Table 2. As described for other plant fructokinases (Doehlert, 1990; Renz et al., 1993), FK1 and FK2 exhibited substrate inhibition when the fructose concentration exceeded 1 mM (Fig. 6A; Table 2). FK1 was 10‐fold more sensitive to inhibition by fructose than FK2. In contrast, the membrane‐bound HK did not exhibit substrate inhibition (Fig. 6C), and was sensitive to the HK inhibitors mannoheptulose, N‐acetylglucosamine, glucosamine, and ADP. The Ki values for NC‐HK were lower when the sugar substrate was fructose (Table 2). This was not the case for ADP: the Ki value was 10‐fold higher with fructose as substrate (Galina et al., 1999). The FK1, FK2 and HK1 activities were partially affected by 1 mM ADP (Table 2; Fig. 4C). Fig. 6. Open in new tabDownload slide Kinetic responses of FK1, FK2, HK1, and NC‐HK activities to increasing fructose or glucose concentrations. The activities were assayed as described in Materials and methods and the legend to Fig. 4. The activities are expressed as μmol hexose‐6‐P min−1 mg−1. In (A) responses of FK1 (▴ 0.07 mg ml−1) or FK2 (▵, 0.08 mg ml−1) to increasing fructose concentration as substrate. The curve for FK1 was obtained by fitting the points to Hill equation, v=Vmax[S]/(1+K0.5[S])n. The Hill number was n=2.5±0.1. In (B) HK1 (0.09 mg ml−1) and (C) NC‐HK (0.055 mg ml−1) responses to increasing glucose (•) or fructose (○) concentration as substrates. In (B) and (C), curves from 0 to 0.6 mM were drawn using a simple Michaelis–Menten model. The ATP concentration was held constant at 1 mM using 2 mM PEP and 10 units ml−1 PK. For the sake of clarity, the abscissa scale was expanded from zero to 0.6 mM to show the kinetic behaviour of fructo‐ and hexokinases at the low range of hexose concentrations. An axis break in the abscissa was introduced from 0.6 mM to 1.4 mM hexose. Table 1. Kinetic constants for hexokinases in soluble and membrane fractions of maize roots Enzyme preparationsa Substrates Vmax (μmol H‐6P min−1 mg−1) K0.5b (mM) Vmax/K0.5 FK1 ATP 1.78±0.03 0.09±0.01 20.7 UTP 1.58±0.06 0.29±0.02  5.1 GTP 1.36±0.07 0.21±0.02  6.4 CTP 1.72±0.06 0.57±0.03  3.0 Fructose 1.35±0.07 0.13±0.02 10.8 Glucose N.D.c N.D. – FK2 ATP 1.00±0.02 0.06±0.01 16.13 UTP 0.94±0.04 0.34±0.04  2.76 GTP 0.90±0.02 0.21±0.03  4.25 CTP 1.10±0.06 0.58±0.10  1.9 Fructose 1.07±0.05 0.15±0.02  6.96 Glucose N.D. N.D. – HK1 Fructose 0.68±0.03 0.08±0.01  8.50 Glucose 0.39±0.01 0.08±0.02  4.88 NC‐HK ATP 2.55±0.02 0.05±0.01 50.9 UTP 1.06±0.10 1.32±0.22  0.81 GTP 0.77±0.09 1.41±0.28  0.55 CTP 0.47±0.04 1.47±0.38  0.32 Fructose 2.52±0.13 5.30±1.02 0.48 Glucose 2.43±0.05 0.06±0.01 40.5 Enzyme preparationsa Substrates Vmax (μmol H‐6P min−1 mg−1) K0.5b (mM) Vmax/K0.5 FK1 ATP 1.78±0.03 0.09±0.01 20.7 UTP 1.58±0.06 0.29±0.02  5.1 GTP 1.36±0.07 0.21±0.02  6.4 CTP 1.72±0.06 0.57±0.03  3.0 Fructose 1.35±0.07 0.13±0.02 10.8 Glucose N.D.c N.D. – FK2 ATP 1.00±0.02 0.06±0.01 16.13 UTP 0.94±0.04 0.34±0.04  2.76 GTP 0.90±0.02 0.21±0.03  4.25 CTP 1.10±0.06 0.58±0.10  1.9 Fructose 1.07±0.05 0.15±0.02  6.96 Glucose N.D. N.D. – HK1 Fructose 0.68±0.03 0.08±0.01  8.50 Glucose 0.39±0.01 0.08±0.02  4.88 NC‐HK ATP 2.55±0.02 0.05±0.01 50.9 UTP 1.06±0.10 1.32±0.22  0.81 GTP 0.77±0.09 1.41±0.28  0.55 CTP 0.47±0.04 1.47±0.38  0.32 Fructose 2.52±0.13 5.30±1.02 0.48 Glucose 2.43±0.05 0.06±0.01 40.5 aThe enzyme preparations were obtained from the cytosol (FK1, FK2 and HK1) or from submitochondrial particles (NC‐HK) as described in Materials and methods. The Km values for nucleotides were measured with 0.8 mM fructose in FK1 and FK2 or 0.8 mM glucose in HK1 and NC‐HK assays. The nucleotide affinities for HK1 were practically the same as those of FK2. bK0.5 values for hexoses were measured with 1 mM ATP in all enzyme preparations. For assay conditions see Materials and Methods. The values represent mean ±SE of at least three different preparations. cND, not detectable. Open in new tab Table 1. Kinetic constants for hexokinases in soluble and membrane fractions of maize roots Enzyme preparationsa Substrates Vmax (μmol H‐6P min−1 mg−1) K0.5b (mM) Vmax/K0.5 FK1 ATP 1.78±0.03 0.09±0.01 20.7 UTP 1.58±0.06 0.29±0.02  5.1 GTP 1.36±0.07 0.21±0.02  6.4 CTP 1.72±0.06 0.57±0.03  3.0 Fructose 1.35±0.07 0.13±0.02 10.8 Glucose N.D.c N.D. – FK2 ATP 1.00±0.02 0.06±0.01 16.13 UTP 0.94±0.04 0.34±0.04  2.76 GTP 0.90±0.02 0.21±0.03  4.25 CTP 1.10±0.06 0.58±0.10  1.9 Fructose 1.07±0.05 0.15±0.02  6.96 Glucose N.D. N.D. – HK1 Fructose 0.68±0.03 0.08±0.01  8.50 Glucose 0.39±0.01 0.08±0.02  4.88 NC‐HK ATP 2.55±0.02 0.05±0.01 50.9 UTP 1.06±0.10 1.32±0.22  0.81 GTP 0.77±0.09 1.41±0.28  0.55 CTP 0.47±0.04 1.47±0.38  0.32 Fructose 2.52±0.13 5.30±1.02 0.48 Glucose 2.43±0.05 0.06±0.01 40.5 Enzyme preparationsa Substrates Vmax (μmol H‐6P min−1 mg−1) K0.5b (mM) Vmax/K0.5 FK1 ATP 1.78±0.03 0.09±0.01 20.7 UTP 1.58±0.06 0.29±0.02  5.1 GTP 1.36±0.07 0.21±0.02  6.4 CTP 1.72±0.06 0.57±0.03  3.0 Fructose 1.35±0.07 0.13±0.02 10.8 Glucose N.D.c N.D. – FK2 ATP 1.00±0.02 0.06±0.01 16.13 UTP 0.94±0.04 0.34±0.04  2.76 GTP 0.90±0.02 0.21±0.03  4.25 CTP 1.10±0.06 0.58±0.10  1.9 Fructose 1.07±0.05 0.15±0.02  6.96 Glucose N.D. N.D. – HK1 Fructose 0.68±0.03 0.08±0.01  8.50 Glucose 0.39±0.01 0.08±0.02  4.88 NC‐HK ATP 2.55±0.02 0.05±0.01 50.9 UTP 1.06±0.10 1.32±0.22  0.81 GTP 0.77±0.09 1.41±0.28  0.55 CTP 0.47±0.04 1.47±0.38  0.32 Fructose 2.52±0.13 5.30±1.02 0.48 Glucose 2.43±0.05 0.06±0.01 40.5 aThe enzyme preparations were obtained from the cytosol (FK1, FK2 and HK1) or from submitochondrial particles (NC‐HK) as described in Materials and methods. The Km values for nucleotides were measured with 0.8 mM fructose in FK1 and FK2 or 0.8 mM glucose in HK1 and NC‐HK assays. The nucleotide affinities for HK1 were practically the same as those of FK2. bK0.5 values for hexoses were measured with 1 mM ATP in all enzyme preparations. For assay conditions see Materials and Methods. The values represent mean ±SE of at least three different preparations. cND, not detectable. Open in new tab Table 2. Inhibitor constants (Ki) for hexokinase and fructokinase inhibitors in soluble and membrane fractions of maize roots Enzyme preparationsa Inhibitors Kib (mM) Glucose as substrate Fructose as substrate FK1 Mannoheptulose – No inhibition N–Acetylglucosamine – No inhibition Glucosamine – No inhibition ADP – No inhibition Fructose – 2.3±0.7 FK2 Mannoheptulose – No inhibition N–Acetylglucosamine – No inhibition Glucosamine – No inhibition ADP – No inhibition Fructose – 25.2±6.5 HK1 Mannoheptulose 20.5±5.1 – N–Acetylglucosamine – – Glucosamine 79.8±6.7 – ADP No inhibition – Fructose – – NC–HK Mannoheptulose 0.47±0.02 0.08±0.01 N–Acetylglucosamine 0.49±0.02 0.15±0.02 Glucosamine 0.83±0.06 0.41±0.01 ADP 0.03±0.01 0.46±0.12 Fructose – No inhibition Enzyme preparationsa Inhibitors Kib (mM) Glucose as substrate Fructose as substrate FK1 Mannoheptulose – No inhibition N–Acetylglucosamine – No inhibition Glucosamine – No inhibition ADP – No inhibition Fructose – 2.3±0.7 FK2 Mannoheptulose – No inhibition N–Acetylglucosamine – No inhibition Glucosamine – No inhibition ADP – No inhibition Fructose – 25.2±6.5 HK1 Mannoheptulose 20.5±5.1 – N–Acetylglucosamine – – Glucosamine 79.8±6.7 – ADP No inhibition – Fructose – – NC–HK Mannoheptulose 0.47±0.02 0.08±0.01 N–Acetylglucosamine 0.49±0.02 0.15±0.02 Glucosamine 0.83±0.06 0.41±0.01 ADP 0.03±0.01 0.46±0.12 Fructose – No inhibition aThe enzyme preparations were obtained as described in Table 1. bKi values were calculated as described in Materials and methods. The values represent mean ±SE of at least three different preparations. The symbol (–) mean that the assay was not performed under that condition. No inhibition refers to lack of inhibition up to 300 mM of each hexose analogue, 500 μM ADP or 300 mM fructose or glucose tested for inhibition. Open in new tab Table 2. Inhibitor constants (Ki) for hexokinase and fructokinase inhibitors in soluble and membrane fractions of maize roots Enzyme preparationsa Inhibitors Kib (mM) Glucose as substrate Fructose as substrate FK1 Mannoheptulose – No inhibition N–Acetylglucosamine – No inhibition Glucosamine – No inhibition ADP – No inhibition Fructose – 2.3±0.7 FK2 Mannoheptulose – No inhibition N–Acetylglucosamine – No inhibition Glucosamine – No inhibition ADP – No inhibition Fructose – 25.2±6.5 HK1 Mannoheptulose 20.5±5.1 – N–Acetylglucosamine – – Glucosamine 79.8±6.7 – ADP No inhibition – Fructose – – NC–HK Mannoheptulose 0.47±0.02 0.08±0.01 N–Acetylglucosamine 0.49±0.02 0.15±0.02 Glucosamine 0.83±0.06 0.41±0.01 ADP 0.03±0.01 0.46±0.12 Fructose – No inhibition Enzyme preparationsa Inhibitors Kib (mM) Glucose as substrate Fructose as substrate FK1 Mannoheptulose – No inhibition N–Acetylglucosamine – No inhibition Glucosamine – No inhibition ADP – No inhibition Fructose – 2.3±0.7 FK2 Mannoheptulose – No inhibition N–Acetylglucosamine – No inhibition Glucosamine – No inhibition ADP – No inhibition Fructose – 25.2±6.5 HK1 Mannoheptulose 20.5±5.1 – N–Acetylglucosamine – – Glucosamine 79.8±6.7 – ADP No inhibition – Fructose – – NC–HK Mannoheptulose 0.47±0.02 0.08±0.01 N–Acetylglucosamine 0.49±0.02 0.15±0.02 Glucosamine 0.83±0.06 0.41±0.01 ADP 0.03±0.01 0.46±0.12 Fructose – No inhibition aThe enzyme preparations were obtained as described in Table 1. bKi values were calculated as described in Materials and methods. The values represent mean ±SE of at least three different preparations. The symbol (–) mean that the assay was not performed under that condition. No inhibition refers to lack of inhibition up to 300 mM of each hexose analogue, 500 μM ADP or 300 mM fructose or glucose tested for inhibition. Open in new tab Discussion Localization of fructokinases and hexokinases in subcellular fractions of seedling maize roots At least two soluble cytosolic fructokinases (FK1, FK2) were detected in seedling maize roots (Figs 1, 6). A large portion of the total fructose phosphorylation occurred by cytosolic fructokinase activity which could be inhibited by high fructose concentration, similar to the results of others (Doehlert, 1990; Renz et al., 1993) (Fig. 6A). However, it was not possible to inhibit fructose phosphorylation in non‐cytosolic membrane fractions with the same technique (Fig. 6C). The preferential cytosolic localization of the fructokinases is possibly involved in the phosphorylation of fructose derived from sucrose by either the invertase or sucrose‐synthase enzymes. In contrast, the hexokinase activity in seedling maize roots is distributed between cytosolic and non‐cytosolic fractions (Figs 1, 2, 3). Here it is shown that a substantial portion (∼30%) of the non‐cytosolic activity is associated with the Golgi apparatus and other cellular membranes of maize roots (Figs 2, 3B). In mammalian tissues it has been demonstrated that Golgi‐glucokinase facilitates the biosynthesis of UDP‐glucose (Berthillier et al., 1973; Berthillier and Got, 1974; Iijima and Awazi, 1972). It has also been found that NC‐HK is coupled to UDP‐glucose formation in maize roots (Figs 4, 6C; Galina and da‐Silva, 2000). It may be that NC‐HK is involved in glycosylation reactions in the Golgi apparatus, and ADP plays a critical role modulating its activity here and on the mitochondria. The location of hexokinases in Golgi and mitochondrial membranes suggests an interaction between these organelles (Morré, 1964). The kinetic constants of fructokinases and hexokinases The kinetic constants revealed that all hexokinase isoforms tested phosphorylate their sugar substrates more readily with ATP than with other nucleotides. A very high catalytic efficiency with ATP was observed for NC‐HK (Table 1). In maize roots, no FK with a high specificity for UTP was found, such as the FK‐0 which was described in maize endosperm (Doehlert, 1990) and suggested to take part in the cycling of UTP during sucrose degradation by sucrose synthase and FK (Huber and Akazawa, 1986). However, it was shown in maize root tips (Zeng et al., 1999) that anoxia favours sucrose cleavage via sucrose synthase. It would be of interest to know whether the FK‐0 is present in maize roots under anoxic conditions. Substrate inhibition of the FK1 and FK2 fractions resembles that described for several plant FK sources. However, with fructose as substrate, FK1 exhibited a strong co‐operativity (Hill n=2.5) and a much lower Ki for fructose than FK2 (Fig. 6A, filled triangles; Table 2). This is the first kinetic evidence that the fructose phosphorylation rate may be controlled allosterically by variations in cytosolic fructose. At low fructose levels, the co‐operative activation of FK1 would increase the phosphorylation rate sharply in response to small increases in fructose. At fructose concentrations above 1.5 mM, inhibition of FK1 could be a mechanism to prevent trapping Pi and depleting ATP due to a high rate of fructose phosphorylation uncoupled from the demand for fructose carbons through glycolysis (Teusink et al., 1998). The cytosolic HK1 seems not to be regulated by glucose and fructose levels (Fig. 6B). The HK1 may be involved in maintaining the cytosolic fructose phosphorylations at low rates, even in the presence of high cytosolic fructose levels (see below). HK inhibitors impair phosphorylation of hexoses by non‐cytosolic hexokinase In plants, has been shown that it is not the uptake of hexoses into the cell, but rather their entry into metabolism through phosphorylation by hexokinase that triggers a broad spectrum of gene repression, a phenomena known as sugar‐sensing (Graham et al., 1994; Jang and Sheen, 1994; Jang et al., 1997; Pego et al., 1999; Smeekens, 1998; Sheen et al., 1999). One important finding establishing the role of hexokinase as sensor was the fact that addition of competitive inhibitors of hexose binding such as mannoheptulose, N‐acetylglucosamine or glucosamine, relieved the gene repressed by hexoses (Jang and Sheen, 1994; Yamaguchi et al., 1997; Pego et al., 1999). The results shown in this study give the first kinetic evidence that the sugar‐sensing cascade may occur through NC‐HK bound to mitochondria, Golgi, plasmalemma or internal membranes in maize roots (Figs 3, 4; Table 2). All of the NC‐HK bound to mitochondria (∼60%), Golgi vesicles (∼30%) and the microsomal fraction (∼10%) are inhibited by HK inhibitors, including ADP; but most of the cytosolic isoforms are not (Figs 3B, 4, 5; see also Galina et al., 1995; Galina and da‐Silva, 2000). The very modest inhibition of cytosolic FK and HK by mannoheptulose, N‐acetylglucosamine and glucosamine suggests a high degree of sugar stereo‐selectivity of the catalytic sites of the cytosolic enzymes. Similar results were observed with cytosolic glucokinase purified from young tomato fruit, which was inhibited by only 26% with 100 mM mannoheptulose (with 0.4 mM glucose) (Martinez‐Barajas and Randall, 1998). In recent work with rice embryos (Guglielminetti et al., 2000), it was observed that two isoforms of HK (HK1 and HK2) and one of glucokinase (GK3) were inhibited by the glucose analogues, mannoheptulose and glucosamine. It was hypothesized that these isoforms are involved in the sugar‐sensing process. Interestingly, the subcellular fraction employed in rice embryo studies was the 15 000 g supernatant fraction, which contains Golgi vesicles, microsomes and soluble enzymes. Here it is shown that this fraction in maize roots contains NC‐HK that is inhibited by these glucose analogues. Some caution is required when correlating glucose analogue inhibition to the sugar‐sensing process, because the NC‐HK may require the presence of some signal transduction factor anchored to the same membrane (Koch et al., 2000). Indirect evidence for a distinct subcellular site of NC‐HK‐mediated sugar‐sensing comes from transgenic tobacco leaf cells studies (Herbers et al., 1996). The expression of yeast invertase in apoplasts or vacuoles leads to elevated concentrations of glucose and fructose which are sensed in plants expressing invertase, resulting in altered gene expression and leaf lesions. These effects were not observed when invertase was expressed in the cytosol. It was proposed that hexoses are sensed only in secretory membrane system of endoplasmic reticulum or Golgi apparatus (Herbers et al., 1996). Based on these results and the current paradigm that most of the hexokinase is a glycolytic and cytosolic enzyme, the role of hexokinase in sugar‐sensing has been questioned (Halford et al., 1999). The results of this study indicate that in maize, HK inhibitors preferentially inhibit the mitochondrial, microsomal and Golgi‐bound hexokinases and have very little effect on the cytosolic hexokinase and fructokinases (Figs 4, 5, 7; Table 2). It was shown that Arabidopsis over‐expressing the product of Athxk 1 gene (HxK I) presents high glucose sensitivity (Jang et al., 1997). Recently, the association of a HxK I with chloroplast outer envelope membrane has been demonstrated in spinach leaves (Wiese et al., 1999). Spinach HxK I and corresponding cDNA from tobacco and potato are highly homologous to Arabidopsis HxK I and II, which also possess a hydrophobic N‐terminal membrane anchor. This N‐terminal seems to be important for association of HxK I with chloroplast envelope membranes (Wiese et al., 1999). A different hydrophobic N‐terminal segment is known to be critical for binding of the mammalian Type I hexokinase to porin located in outer membrane of mitochondria (Wilson, 1997). However, the molecular characteristics of the HK association with mitochondria and other internal membrane systems have not yet been established. The extent to which the Arabidopsis hexokinase resembles the hexokinases has been shown to be associated with mitochondria in maize roots (Galina et al., 1995, 1999) also remains to be determined. However, the affinity of glucose and fructose for AtHxK I over‐expressed in tomato plants (Dai et al., 1999) showed a very similar profile to those described for NC‐HK in this paper (Fig. 6C). Based on the HK inhibitors as markers of the sugar‐sensing process, the data presented in this report suggest that the sugar‐sensing hexokinase is not cytosolic in maize roots. Recently, evidence was given for an interface between transduction pathways of hexose and energy charge signals (Koch et al., 2000). It would be of interest to evaluate which signal transduction elements are associated with mitochondrial/Golgi‐apparatus membranes and how ADP (a natural HK regulator) modulates the hexose sensor activity of maize non‐cytosolic hexokinases. Fig. 7. Open in new tabDownload slide Hypothetical model of subcellular organization and short‐term (kinetic) adaptive responses of the hexose‐phosphorylating potential to variations in hexose and adenylate energy charge levels in maize root cells. In maize root cells bathed with high hexose concentrations and in normoxia (low ADP), after passage through monosaccharide transporter, the glucose and fructose phosphorylation by soluble HK1(▪), FK2(▴) and membrane associated hexokinases NC‐HK(blast symbol) represents the major source of hexose 6‐phosphate for glycolysis and UDP‐Glc synthesis (A). An increased rate of cytosolic fructose phosphorylation by soluble FK1(black ellipse) and FK2(▴) paralleled with a decreased rate of fructose phosphorylation by NC‐HK represents an early response to low hexose levels in normoxic states (B). With the decrease in aerobic‐oxidative mitochondrial activity due to a hypoxic state, adenylate energy charge is shifted and the ADP concentration becomes high. At hypoxic state and high hexose levels, the fructose phosphorylation is carried out at low rates in part by fructose‐inhibited cytosolic FK1 and FK2 and by ADP‐inhibited NC‐HK. The glucose phosphorylation is sustained by soluble HK1 and very low rate of UDP‐Glc formation occurs by ADP‐inhibited NC‐HK (Galina and da‐Silva, 2000) (C). An increased rate of cytosolic fructose phosphorylation by soluble FK1 and FK2 represent early response to low hexose levels in hypoxic states (D). The suggested enzyme activities is indicated by arrows: (solid arrow) maximal rate; (dotted arrow) low rate; and (dotted break arrow) very low rate. None of the cytosolic enzyme forms is significantly inhibited by ADP or glucose analogues. The hexose phosphorylations that take place close to mitochondria, Golgi‐endoplasmic reticulum or plasmalemma are under tight control by ADP and are inhibited by glucose analogues mannoheptulose, N‐acetylglucosamine and glucosamine. Hexose sensing is proposed to be mediated by membrane associated hexokinases (NC‐HK). Subcellular organization of the hexose‐phosphorylation diversity in maize seedlings Based on the data presented in this report and the current knowledge of plant carbohydrate translocation, an integrative model is proposed for subcellular organization and the short‐term (kinetic) adaptive responses of the hexose‐phosphorylating potential to variations in hexose and adenylate energy‐charge levels in maize root cells (Fig. 7). In maize root axis, the sugar concentration varies from 500 mM in the phloem to less than 5 mM in the root tips (Bret‐Harte and Silk, 1994; Dieuaide‐Noubhani et al., 1995). At extremely low hexose levels (up to 1 mM), either FK1, FK2 or HK1 would phosphorylate glucose and fructose at their maximal rates (Figs 6A, B, 7B, D). Under this condition, NC‐HK would function as a ‘glucokinase‐like’ enzyme with a tight regulation by ADP (Figs 4C, 6C, 7B, D). At high hexose levels (>20 mM) the cytosolic FK2 activity would be reduced to 20% and FK1 completely blocked (Figs 6A, 7A, C). The fructose phosphorylations would be carried out only by the NC‐HK and, at low rate, by the HK1 (Fig. 6B, C), with very little control from ADP (Figs 4C, 7A, C; Galina et al., 1999). The glucose phosphorylation catalysed by HK1 is unaffected by the adenylate charge (Figs 4C, 7A, C). In agreement with recent data (Galina and da‐Silva, 2000), neither ADP nor HK inhibitors have much effect on the cytosolic FK and HK activities. The lack of ADP inhibition suggests that cytosolic FK and HK are involved in the glycolysis (Givan, 1974; Farrar and Williams, 1991). A negative regulation by ADP was found with NC‐HK mediating the UDP‐glucose formation (Galina and da‐Silva, 2000) suggesting that these isoforms do not take part in the glycolytic pathway. 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +55 21 270 8647. E‐mail: galina@bioqmed.ufrj.br WSS is a recipient of a fellowship from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Brasil. GLR is a recipient of a fellowship from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. We are grateful to Martha Sorenson and Roger Seymour critically reading the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) proc. no. E‐26/170.713/99; Programa de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, PADCT‐CNPQ no. 620433/91‐4; (FINEP/PRONEX/FUJB) no. 76.97.1000.000. References Berthillier G, Dubois P, Got R. 1973 . Glucokinase microsomique du foie de rat. Localisation dans une fraction riche en appareil de Golgi. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 293, 370 –378. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Berthillier G, Got R. 1974 . Biosynthèse de l'UDPglucose par les microsomes des hépatocytes de rat. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 362, 390 –402. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Board M, Colquhoun A, Newsholme EA. 1995 . High Km glucose‐phosphorylating (glucokinase) activities in a range of tumor cell lines and inhibition of rates of tumor growth by the specific enzyme inhibitor mannoheptulose. Cancer Research 55, 3278 –3285. Google Scholar Borchert S, Harborth J, Schünemann D, Hoferichter P, Heldt HW. 1993 . Studies of the enzymic capacities and transport properties of pea root plastids. Plant Physiology 101, 303 –312. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Bret‐Harte MS, Silk WK. 1994 . Non‐vascular, symplasmic diffusion of sucrose cannot satisfy the carbon demands of growth in the primary root tip of Zea mays L. Plant Physiology 105, 19 –33. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Dai N, Schaffer AA, Petreikov M, Granot D. 1995 . Arabidopsis thaliana hexokinase cDNA isolated by complementation of yeast cells. Plant Physiology 108, 879 –880. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Dai N, Schaffer AA, Petreikov M, Shahak Y, Giller Y, Ratner K, Levine A, Granot D. 1999 . Overexpression of Arabidopsis hexokinase in tomato plants inhibits growth, reduces photosynthesis and induces rapid senescence. The Plant Cell 11, 1253 –1266. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Dieuaide‐Noubhani M, Raffard G, Canioni P, Pradet A, Raymond P. 1995 . Quantification of compartmented metabolic fluxes in maize root tips using isotope distribution from 13C‐ or 14C‐labeled glucose. Journal of Biological Chemistry 270, 13147 –13159. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Doehlert DC. 1990 . Fructokinases from developing maize kernels differ in their specificity for nucleoside triphosphates. Plant Physiology 93, 353 –355. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Douce R, Christensen EL, Bonner Jr WD. 1972 . Preparation of intact plant mitochondria. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 275, 148 –160. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Dunwell JM. 2000 . Transgenic approaches to crop improvement. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, Special Issue, 487 –496. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Echeverria E, Boyer CD, Thomas PA, Shannon JC. 1988 . Enzyme activities associated with maize kernel amyloplasts. Plant Physiology 86, 786 –792. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Farrar J, Williams JHH. 1991 . Control of the rate of respiration in roots: compartmentation, demand and the supply of substrate. In: Emes M, ed. Compartmentation of metabolism . Butterworths, 167 –188. Google Scholar Fiske CF, Subbarow Y. 1925 . The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. Journal of Biological Chemistry 66, 375 –400. Google Scholar Galina A, da‐Silva WS. 2000 . Hexokinase activity alters sugar‐nucleotide formation in maize root homogenates. Phytochemistry 53, 29 –37. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Galina A, Logullo C, Souza EF, Rezende GL, da‐Silva WS. 1999 . Sugar phosphorylation modulates ADP inhibition of maize mitochondrial hexokinase. Physiologia Plantarum 105, 17 –23. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Galina A, Reis M, Albuquerque MC, Puyou AG, Puyou MT, de Meis L. 1995 . Different properties of the mitochondrial and cytosolic hexokinases in maize roots. Biochemical Journal 309, 105 –112. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Givan CV. 1974 . Regulation of glycoysis by adenosine diphosphate in Pisum sativum. Phytochemistry 13, 1741 –1745. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Graham IA, Denby KJ, Leaver CJ. 1994 . Carbon catabolite repression regulates glyoxylate cycle gene expression in cucumber. The Plant Cell 6, 761 –772. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Guglielminetti L, Perata P, Morita A, Loreti E, Yamaguchi J, Alpi A. 2000 . Characterization of isoforms of hexose kinases in rice embryo. Phytochemistry 53, 195 –200. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Halford NG, Purcell PC, Hardie DG. 1999 . Is hexokinase really a sugar sensor in plants? Trends in Plant Science 4, 117 –120. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Herbers K, Meuwly P, Frommer WB, Métraux J‐P, Sonnewald U. 1996 . Systemic acquired resistance mediated by the ectopic expression of invertase: possible hexose sensing in the secretory pathway. The Plant Cell 8, 793 –803. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Hooks MA, Shearer GC, Roberts JKM. 1994 . Nucleotide availability in maize (Zea mays L.) root tips. Plant Physiology 104, 581 –589. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Huber SC, Akazawa T. 1986 . A novel sucrose synthase pathway for sucrose degradation in cultured sycamore cells. Plant Physiology 81, 1008 –1013. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Iijima K, Awazi N. 1972 . Histochemical studies on the morphology of the Golgi apparatus and on distribution of hexokinase and some enzymes concerning vitamin C synthesis in substantia nigra of the rabbit. Acta Histochimica 44, 122 –136. Google Scholar Jang J‐C, León P, Zhou L, Sheen J. 1997 . Hexokinase as a sugar sensor in higher plants. The Plant Cell 9, 5 –19. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Jang J‐C, Sheen J. 1994 . Sugar sensing in higher plants. The Plant Cell 6, 1665 –1679. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Koch KE. 1996 . Carbohydrate‐modulated gene expression in plants. Annual Reviews of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 47, 509 –540. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Koch KE, Ying Z, Wu Y, Avigne WT. 2000 . Multiple paths of sugar‐sensing and a sugar/oxygen overlap for genes of sucrose and ethanol metabolism. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, Special issue, 417 –427. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Malaisse WJ. 1998 . Monosaccharide esters: new tools in biomedical research. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism 65, 129 –142. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Martinez‐Barajas E, Randall DD. 1998 . Purification and characterization of a glucokinase from young tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L. Mill.) fruit. Planta 205, 567 –573. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Morré DJ. 1964 . Isolation of the Golgi apparatus from plant cells. Journal of Cell Biology 23, 295 –305. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Morré DJ. 1971 . Isolation of Golgi apparatus. Methods in Enzymology 22, 130 –148. Google Scholar Nagahashi J, Kane AP. 1982 . Triton‐stimulated nucleoside diphosphatase activity: Subcellular localization in corn root homogenates. Protoplasma 112, 167 –173. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Pego JV, Weisbeek PJ, Smeekens S. 1999 . Mannose inhibits Arabidopsis germination via a hexokinase‐medited step. Plant Physiology 119, 1017 –1023. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Renz A, Merlo L, Stitt M. 1993 . Partial purification from potato tubers of three fructokinases and three hexokinases which show differing organ and developmental specificity. Planta 190, 156 –165. Google Scholar Sheen J, Zhou L, Jang J‐C. 1999 . Sugars as signaling molecules. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2, 410 –418. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Smeekens S. 1998 . Sugar regulation of gene expression in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 1, 230 –234. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Smith SB, Taylor MA, Burch LR, Davies HV. 1993 . Primary structure and characterization of a cDNA clone of fructokinase from potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Record). Plant Physiology 102, 95 –106. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Taylor CB. 1997 . Sweet sensations. The Plant Cell 9, 1 –4. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Teusink B, Walsh MC, Dam KV, Westerhoff HV. 1998 . The danger of metabolic pathways with turbo design. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 23, 161 –166. Google Scholar Umemura T, Perata P, Futsuhara Y, Yamaguchi J. 1998 . Sugar sensing and α‐amylase gene repression in rice embryos. Planta 204, 420 –428. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Wiese A, Gröner F, Sonnewald U, Deppner H, Lerchl J, Hebbeker U, Flügge U‐I, Weber A. 1999 . Spinach hexokinase I is located in the outer envelope membrane of plastids. Federation of European Biochemical Societies Letters 461, 13 –18. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Widell S, Larsson C. 1990 . A critical evaluation of markers used in plasma membrane purification. In: Larsson C, Moller IM, eds. The plant plasma membrane: structure, function and molecular biology . Springer‐Verlag, 147 –159. Google Scholar Wilson JE. 1997 . Homologous and heterologous interactions between hexokinase and mitochondrial porin: evolutionary implications. Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes 29, 97 –102. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Xu LZ, Weber IT, Harrison RW, Gidh‐Jain M, Pilkis SJ. 1995 . Sugar specificity of human β‐cell glucokinase: correlation of molecular models with kinetic measurements. Biochemistry 34, 6083 –6092. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS Yamaguchi J, Umemura T‐A, Futsuhara Y, Perata P. 1997 . Sugar sensing and alpha‐amylase gene repression in rice embryos. Plant Physiology 114s, 46 . Google Scholar Zeng Y, Wu Y, Avigne WT, Koch KE. 1999 . Rapid repression of maize invertases by low oxygen. Invertase/sucrose synthase balance, sugar signaling potential and seedling survival. Plant Physiology 121, 599 –608. Google Scholar Crossref Search ADS © Society for Experimental Biology © Society for Experimental Biology

Journal

Journal of Experimental BotanyOxford University Press

Published: Jun 1, 2001

There are no references for this article.