Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Michael Jones, Lisa House, Zhifeng Gao (2015)
Attribute Non-Attendance and Satisficing Behavior in Online Choice Experiments
F. Strack, N. Schwarz, M. Wänke (1991)
Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects of Context Effects in Social and Psychological ResearchSocial Cognition, 9
Neil Malhotra (2008)
Completion Time and Response Order Effects in Web SurveysPublic Opinion Quarterly, 72
D. Hillygus, N. Jackson, McKenzie Young (2014)
Professional respondents in nonprobability online panels
R. Tourangeau, L. Rips, K. Rasinski (2000)
The Psychology of Survey Response
A. Herzog, J. Bachman (1981)
Effects of Questionnaire Length on Response QualityPublic Opinion Quarterly, 45
R. Tourangeau, K. Rasinski (1988)
Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude MeasurementPsychological Bulletin, 103
Scott Barge, Hunter Gehlbach (2011)
Using the Theory of Satisficing to Evaluate the Quality of Survey DataResearch in Higher Education, 53
J. Krosnick, D. Alwin (1987)
AN EVALUATION OF A COGNITIVE THEORY OF RESPONSE-ORDER EFFECTS IN SURVEY MEASUREMENTPublic Opinion Quarterly, 51
J. Zagorsky, Pat Rhoton (2008)
The Effects of Promised Monetary Incentives on Attrition in a Long-Term Panel SurveyPublic Opinion Quarterly, 72
B. Duffy, Kate Smith, George Terhanian, J. Bremer (2005)
Comparing Data from Online and Face-to-face SurveysInternational Journal of Market Research, 47
P. Biemer, S. Stokes (1989)
The optimal design of quality control samples to detect interviewer cheating
H. Simon (1956)
Rational choice and the structure of the environment.Psychological review, 63 2
F. Nye, James Short (1957)
SCALING DELINQUENT BEHAVIORAmerican Sociological Review, 22
J. Hox, N. Borgers (2001)
Item Nonresponse in Questionnaire Research with ChildrenJournal of Official Statistics, 17
A. Kapelner, D. Chandler (2010)
Preventing Satisficing in Online Surveys: A "Kapcha" to Ensure Higher Quality Data
Daniel Oppenheimer, T. Meyvis, Nicolas Davidenko (2009)
Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical PowerPolitical Methods: Experiments & Experimental Design eJournal
Joerg–Peter Schraepler, G. Wagner (2005)
Characteristics and impact of faked interviews in surveys – An analysis of genuine fakes in the raw data of SOEPAllgemeines Statistisches Archiv, 89
J. Krosnick (1991)
Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveysApplied Cognitive Psychology, 5
Adam Berinsky, M. Margolis, Michael Sances (2014)
Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self‐Administered SurveysAmerican Journal of Political Science, 58
P. Chen (2011)
Finding Quality Responses: The Problem of Low-Quality Survey Responses and Its Impact on Accountability MeasuresResearch in Higher Education, 52
Jiaming Fang, Chao Wen, V. Prybutok (2014)
An assessment of equivalence between paper and social media surveys: The role of social desirability and satisficingComput. Hum. Behav., 30
M. Galesic, R. Tourangeau, M. Couper, F. Conrad (2008)
Eye-Tracking Data: New Insights on Response Order Effects and Other Cognitive Shortcuts in Survey Responding.Public opinion quarterly, 72 5
LinChiat Chang, J. Krosnick (2009)
National Surveys Via Rdd Telephone Interviewing Versus the Internet Comparing Sample Representativeness and Response QualityPublic Opinion Quarterly, 73
W. Rogers (1994)
Regression standard errors in clustered samplesStata Technical Bulletin, 3
E. Singer, C. Ye (2013)
The Use and Effects of Incentives in SurveysThe ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 645
Allyson Holbrook, Young-Im Cho, T. Johnson (2006)
The Impact of Question and Respondent Characteristics on Comprehension and Mapping DifficultiesPublic Opinion Quarterly, 70
Reg Baker, S. Blumberg, J. Brick, M. Couper, Melanie Courtright, J. Dennis, D. Dillman, M. Frankel, Philip Garland, R. Groves, Courtney Kennedy, J. Krosnick, P. Lavrakas, Sunghee Lee, Michael Link, Linda Piekarski, K. Rao, Randall Thomas, D. Zahs (2010)
Research Synthesis AAPOR Report on Online PanelsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 74
J. Krosnick, S. Narayan, W. Smith (1996)
Satisficing in surveys: Initial evidenceNew Directions for Evaluation, 1996
George Bishop, Andrew Smith (2001)
Response-Order Effects and the Early Gallup Split-BallotsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 65
AbstractSome respondents of online surveys click responses at random. Screeners or instructional manipulation checks (IMC) have become customary for identifying this strong form of satisficing. This research first analyzes the factors that condition IMC failures using an online panel survey carried out in Spain (2011–2015). Our data show that the probability of passing a screener depends mainly on the screener’s difficulty, the individuals’ intrinsic motivations for answering the survey, and past failures. We then address the substantive consequences of omitting those who fail to pass IMCs. We find that this strategy introduces an additional source of bias in descriptive analyses. The article ends with a discussion of the implications that these findings have for the use of IMCs.
International Journal of Public Opinion Research – Oxford University Press
Published: Sep 1, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.