Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Batens (2007)
A Universal Logic Approach to Adaptive LogicsLogica Universalis, 1
D. Batens (1997)
Blocks: the clue to dynamic aspects of logicLogique Et Analyse
Paul Thagard (1988)
Computational Philosophy of Science
D. Batens (2001)
A General Characterization of Adaptive LogicsLogique Et Analyse, 44
Jon Williamson (2003)
Abduction, Reason, and Science: Processes of Discovery and ExplanationThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54
D. Batens, J. Meheus (2001)
Shortcuts and Dynamic Marking in the Tableau Method for Adaptive LogicsStudia Logica, 69
J. Meheus, L. Verhoeven, M. Dyck, Dagmar Provijn (2002)
Ampliative Adaptive Logics and the Foundation of Logic-Based Approaches to Abduction, 25
L. Magnani (1999)
Model-Based Creative Abduction
(1989)
Dynamic dialectical logics
G. Paul (2000)
AI approaches to abduction
D. Batens (2001)
A Dynamic Characterization of the Pure Logic of Relevant ImplicationJournal of Philosophical Logic, 30
D. Batens, J. Meheus (2007)
Recent results by the inconsistency-adaptive labourers.
J. Hintikka (1999)
What is Abduction? The Fundamental Problem of Contemporary EpistemologyTransactions of The Charles S Peirce Society, 34
D. Batens (2004)
The Need for Adaptive Logics In Epistemology
(1995)
The clue to dynamic aspects of logic. Logique et Analyse
A. Aliseda-Llera (1998)
Seeking explanations: abduction in logic, philosophy of science and artificial intelligence
D. Batens (2005)
A procedural criterion for final derivability in inconsistency-adaptive logicsJ. Appl. Log., 3
D. Batens, Dagmar Provijn (2003)
Pushing the Search Paths in the Proofs. A Study in Proof HeuristicsLogique Et Analyse
Paul Thagard (1999)
How Scientists Explain Disease
D. Batens, Lieven Haesaert (2003)
On Classical Adaptive Logics of InductionLogique Et Analyse
D. Batens (2000)
A survey of inconsistency-adaptive logics
J. Kohlas, S. Moral (2000)
Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems
D. Batens, J. Meheus (2000)
A Tableau Method for Inconsistency-Adaptive Logics
This paper presents and illustrates a formal logic for the abduction of singular hypotheses. The logic has a semantics and a dynamic proof theory that is sound and complete with respect to the semantics. The logic presupposes that, with respect to a specific application, the set of explananda and the set of possible explanantia are disjoint (but not necessarily exhaustive). Where an explanandum can be explained by different explanantia, the logic allows only for the abduction of their disjunction.
Logic Journal of the IGPL – Oxford University Press
Published: Mar 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.