Abstract HIV is one of the fastest evolving organisms known. It evolves about 1 million times faster than its host, humans. Because HIV establishes chronic infections, with continuous evolution, its divergence within a single infected human surpasses the divergence of the entire humanoid history. Yet, it is still the same virus, infecting the same cell types and using the same replication machinery year after year. Hence, one would think that most mutations that HIV accumulates are neutral. But the picture is more complicated than that. HIV evolution is also a clear example of strong positive selection, that is, mutants have a survival advantage. How do these facts come together? neutral evolution, selective evolution, HIV The neutral theory of molecular evolution (Kimura 1983) has had a profound impact on evolutionary theory and the methods we use to study molecular evolution in general. Although selection clearly has had a large impact on how lifeforms have evolved (Darwin 1859), many features have also arisen due to various stochastic events such as catastrophic population size reductions and “lucky” survival in new or momentarily open niches. Interestingly, HIV captures many of these aspects. The origin of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is complicated; it has crossed the host species barrier several times from several primate hosts into humans (Sharp et al. 1994; Sharp and Hahn 2011). There are two types of HIV, HIV-1, and HIV-2, with different origins in chimpanzees, gorillas, and sooty mangabeys. In addition, simian immunodeficiency viruses (SIVs), as the virus is called when it is not in humans, have also jumped host many times such that some other primate hosts besides humans also are infected by more than one type of primate lentivirus (PLV, the collective name of HIVs and SIVs). The diversity among all these PLVs is very large, with pairwise distances up to 40–50%, yet cross species jumps are still possible. The pandemic version of HIV-1 was likely introduced into humans as recently as in the late 1800s or the early 1900s (Korber et al. 2000; Worobey et al. 2008), although many previous, but globally unsuccessful, introductions may have occurred in the more distant past. This raises the question of how so genetically different viruses can jump into and infect so many different primate hosts. HIV-1 is also extremely diverse within humans, both on the between human hosts level and within a single infected human. For instance, the genetic distance between HIV-1 variants reaches 25% globally between so called subtypes (Leitner 1997) (major pandemic lineages forming distinct phylogenetic clades without significantly detectable recombination between them). Within a single host, HIV-1 can reach diversity levels of 5–10% that have diverged 10% from the founding variant(s) only years after infection (Shankarappa et al. 1999; Immonen et al. 2015). Compared with humans, who differ only 0.1% from each other after 2.5 My of evolution, HIV-1 indeed displays extreme levels of genetic variation. The extreme within-host variation explains the global variation, as all variation, of course, emerges while the virus replicates within a host. Thus, many mutants in an HIV-1 population that exist in a single host survive and are subsequently transmitted. As HIV-1 within-host populations are vast, in the order of 106–1010, quickly raising to appreciable (and detectable) levels would be unlikely unless selection was involved. Indeed, natural evolution of HIV-1 within-host populations is driven by the interaction of the virus and the host’s immune response. In particular, the surface proteins of HIV-1 (encoded by the env gene) are under heavy attack by human antibodies which quickly adapt to neutralize the most prevalent HIV-1 variants (Richman et al. 2003; Wei et al. 2003; Bunnik et al. 2008). Thus, HIV-1 escape mutants will have an advantage and rise to high levels. HIV-1 mutations occur at a very high rate, where all single point mutations occur daily, creating a diverse pool from where escape mutants may be drawn (Coffin 1995). HIV-1 lacks proof reading, causing mutations in nearly every replication round (Mansky and Temin 1995). The lack of proof reading has several advantages, 1) it allows fast replication as proof reading takes time and requires additional repair mechanisms, 2) it generates mostly defective forms of HIV-1 (Aldovini and Young 1990; Rusert et al. 2004), which still need to be killed by the immune system, and among which replication competent HIV-1 can hide, and 3) it generates the genetic variation that facilitates immune escape. The antibody pressure on env explains why it is the most diverse gene on the HIV-1 genome. Although all genes are under some selective pressure mediated by the humoral (antibodies) or cellular (CTL) immune systems, additional pressure on HIV-1 is exerted by antiviral treatment using synthetic drugs. Many current anti-HIV drugs target HIV specific proteins such as the reverse transcriptase and the proteinase, both vital for replication. This targeted pressure also selects mutants from the diverse, low frequency pool that HIV-1 constantly regenerates. Drug induced pressure selects for specific mutations regardless of genetic background, which have been carefully mapped for each antiviral drug, whereas immune pressure is different in every human. When strong pressure is exerted on certain sites, other sites with little or no benefit may tag along and rise to high levels through hitchhiking (Gillespie 2000; Neher and Leitner 2010; Zanini and Neher 2013; Pennings et al. 2014). The population size and replication rate are important factors that contribute to the probability of how HIV-1 drug resistance develops (Bonhoeffer et al. 1997; Nowak et al. 1997; Nijhuis et al. 1998; Duffy et al. 2008; Alexander and Bonhoeffer 2012). Recent work studying population size dynamics and genetic diversity as a function of drug pressure revealed that the stronger the drug pressure was, the more diversification followed the drug-induced population bottleneck (Fun et al. 2018). Thus, more severe drug-induced extinction was followed by more detectable diversification. When large extinctions occurred, previously occupied niches opened up for new virus variants. Many new mutations can then be accepted and as they do no compete for resources until the population regains a size limited by the carrying capacity, or many of the preexisting low-frequency variants have a chance to rise to high relative frequencies. Hence, strong selection against present variants may drastically reduce population size, where stochastic effects may determine which variants get a chance to survive. Indeed, while specific drug mutations become fixed, the path to those drug resistance mutations differs in different patients (Fun et al. 2018). Although the census HIV-1 within-host population size is vast, the effective population size (Ne) has typically been estimated to be much smaller. Many early estimates were in the order of 103–104 (Brown 1997; Nijhuis et al. 1998; Seo et al. 2002), but some suggested Ne in the order of 106 (Coffin 1995; Rouzine and Coffin 1999), approaching the census size. Ne is important because drift has more impact in smaller populations while selection is more important in large populations in explaining how genetic variants evolve in a population. Hence, while Ne is an important parameter explaining population dynamics and the rise of escape mutations, the estimation of the effective population size itself is based on assumptions about neutrality and linkage disequilibrium. This has caused debate on whether the evolution of HIV-1 within a host is mostly driven by drift or selection. The lower estimates of Ne were typically based on the assumption of neutrality. However, it has been pointed out that estimates based on genetic diversity at neutral sites cannot be applied to diversity at sites under selection, for example, sites under drug selection (Kouyos et al. 2006). The large Ne of 106, on the other hand, was estimated under the assumption of positive selection, but instead ignored the effects of recombination, another complicating factor in HIV-1 evolution. In this context, drift in combination with selection can generate a state of negative linkage disequilibrium, known as the Hill–Robertson effect (Hill and Robertson 1966). This would favor recombination as an evolutionary mechanism as it can reduce the time to fixation. HIV-1 recombination is indeed a major mechanism for evolution (Zhuang et al. 2002; Zhang et al. 2010), with a rate on par with the substitution rate (Neher and Leitner 2010). Because transient decreases of Ne significantly enhance the importance of drift over selection, bottleneck effects during HIV-1 evolution are of particular importance. As already mentioned, significant bottlenecks can occur during antiviral treatment. The perhaps less severe, but much more frequent bottlenecks due to immune surveillance also reduce the effective population size (Frost et al. 2001). Classic population genetics predicts that the effective population size is given by the harmonic mean of the census size, thus trending towards a small size. Sites under neutral evolution will therefore be more affected by bottlenecks than selected sites because the diversity at neutral sites is larger and would take longer time to regenerate. Intriguingly, the most severe bottleneck during HIV-1 evolution occurs during transmission, linking within-host evolution to between-host evolution and the global scale of HIV-1 evolution. Transmission causes a severe bottleneck, allowing only a small number of viruses to establish a new population in a new host. Because HIV-1 replication in the donor host mostly generated junk HIV-1, even transmission of many virus particles would only constitute a small number of viable viruses. Many studies have tried to estimate the number of viruses that establish infection, and while the results vary and depend on experimental methodology and mode of transmission, it is clear that a very severe bottleneck takes place, permitting only a single or sometimes tens of viruses to establish a new infection (McNearney et al. 1992; Wolfs et al. 1992; Zhang et al. 1993; Keele et al. 2008; Salazar-Gonzalez et al. 2009; Rieder et al. 2011). The rapid evolutionary rate observed at the within-host level appears not to be sustained at the epidemiological level, however, decreasing by an order of magnitude (Alizon and Fraser 2013). Although several theories have been proposed to explain the rate differences (Herbeck et al. 2006; Maljkovic Berry et al. 2007; Maljkovic Berry et al. 2009; Pybus and Rambaut 2009; Lythgoe and Fraser 2012; Alizon and Fraser 2013), some authors have suggested that the evolutionary rate discrepancy could result from a disproportionate fraction of transmissions involving latent virus that is genetically closer to the founder than the average virus in the plasma population (Lythgoe and Fraser 2012; Vrancken et al. 2014). Interestingly, it has been shown that the evolutionary rate on the global level is inversely correlated with the rate of spread (Berry et al. 2007), that is, the faster HIV-1 spreads, the slower it evolves on the between-host level. This difference is explained by the fact that early infection involves nearly neutral evolution as the immune system is not fully active, whereas later in the infection it is. Thus, if HIV-1 is transmitted during the acute infection phase, then HIV-1 evolves at the slower neural rate also on the between-host scale, whereas if transmissions occur during the chronic phase then the between-host rate would be more similar to the high within-host rate seen later, and during most of, HIV-1 within-host evolutionary time. Such differences have been shown to exist between fast and slow epidemics (Berry et al. 2007). If HIV-1 was selectively transmitted, for example, preferentially selecting for some feature that makes it more transmissible, no such correlation would be detectable. Furthermore, it has been shown that the between-host diversity is shaped by the interplay of the transmission rate and the within-host selection rate (involving both escape from, and reversions of, host-specific CTL mediated mutations), which together can maintain high between-host diversity (Poon et al. 2007). Of course, there may be both neutral and selective mechanisms involved in transmission, such that regardless of genetic background (composed of neutral sites) a few sites that make transmission or early outgrowth possible (selected sites) determine infection probability. HIV-1 evolution is thus described by both neutral and selective evolution. Depending on what the goal with a particular analysis is, one may carefully choose models and methods based on either neutral or selective assumptions. Sometimes it may be necessary to filter sites into separate categories and treat the sets differently. One powerful set of methods includes phylodynamic methods to infer how HIV (and other pathogens) spread among humans (and other hosts). Based on the observation that a between host HIV-1 phylogeny is related to the transmission history between the hosts (Leitner et al. 1996), recent advances using within-host coalescent models have connected within-host evolution to between-host evolution (Ypma et al. 2013; Jombart et al. 2014; Romero-Severson et al. 2014; Kenah et al. 2016; Didelot et al. 2017; Romero-Severson et al. 2017). These models assume neutral evolution as well as neutral transmission. These models have shown that different phylogenetic patterns may reveal epidemiological relationships, that is, who-infected-whom and when (Romero-Severson et al. 2016), and that taking within-host evolution into account when investigating global level epidemics has profound impact on reconstructing transmission networks (Giardina et al. 2017) and incidence trends (Volz et al. 2017). The development of new sequencing technologies has already had an impact on HIV-1 research, and undoubtedly will continue to reveal new insights into HIV-1 evolution. Many of the open issues outlined here will be investigated, previous results based on more limited data will be challenged, and new questions will arise. The interplay between neutral and selective mechanisms will be further illuminated, necessitating both neutral and selective models to interpret the fascinating evolution of HIV-1. Acknowledgment This study was supported by a National Institutes of Health grant R01AI087520. References Aldovini A, Young RA. 1990. Mutations of RNA and protein sequences involved in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 packaging result in production of noninfectious virus. J Virol. 64( 5): 1920– 1926. Google Scholar PubMed Alexander HK, Bonhoeffer S. 2012. Pre-existence and emergence of drug resistance in a generalized model of intra-host viral dynamics. Epidemics 4( 4): 187– 202. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Alizon S, Fraser C. 2013. Within-host and between-host evolutionary rates across the HIV-1 genome. Retrovirology 10: 49. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Berry IM, Ribeiro R, Kothari M, Athreya G, Daniels M, Lee HY, Bruno W, Leitner T. 2007. Unequal evolutionary rates in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) pandemic: the evolutionary rate of HIV-1 slows down when the epidemic rate increases. J Virol. 81( 19): 10625– 10635. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Bonhoeffer S, May RM, Shaw GM, Nowak MA. 1997. Virus dynamics and drug therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 94( 13): 6971– 6976. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Bunnik EM, Pisas L, van Nuenen AC, Schuitemaker H. 2008. Autologous neutralizing humoral immunity and evolution of the viral envelope in the course of subtype B human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J Virol. 82( 16): 7932– 7941. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Coffin JM. 1995. HIV population dynamics in vivo: implications for genetic variation, pathogenesis, and therapy. Science 267( 5197): 483– 489. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Darwin CR. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle of life . London: Murray. Didelot X, Fraser C, Gardy J, Colijn C. 2017. Genomic infectious disease epidemiology in partially sampled and ongoing outbreaks. Mol Biol Evol . 34( 4): 997– 1007. Google Scholar PubMed Duffy S, Shackelton LA, Holmes EC. 2008. Rates of evolutionary change in viruses: patterns and determinants. Nat Rev Genet. 9( 4): 267– 276. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Frost SD, Dumaurier MJ, Wain-Hobson S, Brown AJ. 2001. Genetic drift and within-host metapopulation dynamics of HIV-1 infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 98( 12): 6975– 6980. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Fun A, Leitner T, Vandekerckhove L, Daumer M, Thielen A, Buchholz B, Hoepelman AIM, Gisolf EH, Schipper PJ, Wensing AMJ. 2018. Impact of the HIV-1 genetic background and HIV-1 population size on the evolution of raltegravir resistance. Retrovirology 15( 1): 1. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Giardina F, Romero-Severson EO, Albert J, Britton T, Leitner T. 2017. Inference of transmission network structure from HIV phylogenetic trees. PLoS Comput Biol. 13( 1): e1005316. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Gillespie JH. 2000. Genetic drift in an infinite population. The pseudohitchhiking model. Genetics 155: 909– 919. Google Scholar PubMed Herbeck JT, Nickle DC, Learn GH, Gottlieb GS, Curlin ME, Heath L, Mullins JI. 2006. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 env evolves toward ancestral states upon transmission to a new host. J Virol. 80( 4): 1637– 1644. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Hill WG, Robertson A. 1966. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet Res. 8( 3): 269– 294. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Immonen TT, Conway JM, Romero-Severson EO, Perelson AS, Leitner T. 2015. Recombination enhances HIV-1 envelope diversity by facilitating the survival of latent genomic fragments in the plasma virus population. PLoS Comput Biol. 11( 12): e1004625. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Jombart T, Cori A, Didelot X, Cauchemez S, Fraser C, Ferguson N. 2014. Bayesian reconstruction of disease outbreaks by combining epidemiologic and genomic data. PLoS Comput Biol. 10( 1): e1003457. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Keele BF, Giorgi EE, Salazar-Gonzalez JF, Decker JM, Pham KT, Salazar MG, Sun C, Grayson T, Wang S, Li H, et al. 2008. Identification and characterization of transmitted and early founder virus envelopes in primary HIV-1 infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105( 21): 7552– 7557. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Kenah E, Britton T, Halloran ME, Longini IMJr. 2016. Molecular infectious disease epidemiology: survival analysis and algorithms linking phylogenies to transmission trees. PLoS Comput Biol. 12( 4): e1004869. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Kimura M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Korber B, Muldoon M, Theiler J, Gao F, Gupta R, Lapedes A, Hahn BH, Wolinsky S, Bhattacharya T. 2000. Timing the ancestor of the HIV-1 pandemic strains. Science 288( 5472): 1789– 1796. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Kouyos RD, Althaus CL, Bonhoeffer S. 2006. Stochastic or deterministic: what is the effective population size of HIV-1?. Trends Microbiol. 14( 12): 507– 511. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Brown AJL. 1997. Analysis of HIV-1 env gene sequences reveals evidence for a low effective number in the viral population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 94( 5): 1862– 1865. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Leitner T. 1997. Genetic subtypes of HIV-1. In: Myers G, Korber B, Foley B, Jeang K-T, Mellors JW, Wain-Hobson S, editors. Human retroviruses and AIDS 1996: a compilation and analysis of nucleic acid and amino acid sequences . Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory. p. (III)28– (III)40. Leitner T, Escanilla D, Franzen C, Uhlen M, Albert J. 1996. Accurate reconstruction of a known HIV-1 transmission history by phylogenetic tree analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 93( 20): 10864– 10869. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Lythgoe KA, Fraser C. 2012. New insights into the evolutionary rate of HIV-1 at the within-host and epidemiological levels. Proc Biol Sci. 279( 1741): 3367– 3375. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Maljkovic Berry I, Athreya G, Kothari M, Daniels M, Bruno WJ, Korber B, Kuiken C, Ribeiro RM, Leitner T. 2009. The evolutionary rate dynamically tracks changes in HIV-1 epidemics: application of a simple method for optimizing the evolutionary rate in phylogenetic trees with longitudinal data. Epidemics 1( 4): 230– 239. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Maljkovic Berry I, Ribeiro R, Kothari M, Athreya G, Daniels M, Lee HY, Bruno W, Leitner T. 2007. Unequal evolutionary rates in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) pandemic: the evolutionary rate of HIV-1 slows down when the epidemic rate increases. J Virol. 81( 19): 10625– 10635. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Mansky LM, Temin HM. 1995. Lower in vivo mutation rate of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 than that predicted from the fidelity of purified reverse transcriptase. J Virol. 69( 8): 5087– 5094. Google Scholar PubMed McNearney T, Hornickova Z, Markham R, Birdwell A, Arens M, Saah A, Ratner L. 1992. Relationship of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 sequence heterogeneity to stage of disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 89( 21): 10247– 10251. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Neher RA, Leitner T. 2010. Recombination rate and selection strength in HIV intra-patient evolution. PLoS Comput Biol. 6( 1): e1000660. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Nijhuis M, Boucher CA, Schipper P, Leitner T, Schuurman R, Albert J. 1998. Stochastic processes strongly influence HIV-1 evolution during suboptimal protease-inhibitor therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 95( 24): 14441– 14446. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Nowak MA, Bonhoeffer S, Shaw GM, May RM. 1997. Anti-viral drug treatment: dynamics of resistance in free virus and infected cell populations. J Theor Biol. 184( 2): 203– 217. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Pennings PS, Kryazhimskiy S, Wakeley J. 2014. Loss and recovery of genetic diversity in adapting populations of HIV. PLoS Genet. 10( 1): e1004000. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Poon AF, Kosakovsky Pond SL, Bennett P, Richman DD, Leigh Brown AJ, Frost SD. 2007. Adaptation to human populations is revealed by within-host polymorphisms in HIV-1 and hepatitis C virus. PLoS Pathog. 3( 3): e45. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Pybus OG, Rambaut A. 2009. Evolutionary analysis of the dynamics of viral infectious disease. Nat Rev Genet. 10( 8): 540– 550. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Richman DD, Wrin T, Little SJ, Petropoulos CJ. 2003. Rapid evolution of the neutralizing antibody response to HIV type 1 infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 100( 7): 4144– 4149. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Rieder P, Joos B, Scherrer AU, Kuster H, Braun D, Grube C, Niederöst B, Leemann C, Gianella S, Metzner KJ, et al. 2011. Characterization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) diversity and tropism in 145 patients with primary HIV-1 infection. Clin Infect Dis. 53( 12): 1271– 1279. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Romero-Severson E, Skar H, Bulla I, Albert J, Leitner T. 2014. Timing and order of transmission events is not directly reflected in a pathogen phylogeny. Mol Biol Evol. 31( 9): 2472– 2482. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Romero-Severson EO, Bulla I, Hengartner N, Bartolo I, Abecasis A, Azevedo-Pereira JM, Taveira N, Leitner T. 2017. Donor-recipient identification in para- and poly-phyletic trees under alternative HIV-1 transmission hypotheses using approximate Bayesian computation. Genetics 207( 3): 1089– 1101. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Romero-Severson EO, Bulla I, Leitner T. 2016. Phylogenetically resolving epidemiologic linkage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 113( 10): 2690– 2695. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Rouzine IM, Coffin JM. 1999. Linkage disequilibrium test implies a large effective population number for HIV in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 96( 19): 10758– 10763. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Rusert P, Fischer M, Joos B, Leemann C, Kuster H, Flepp M, Bonhoeffer S, Gunthard HF, Trkola A. 2004. Quantification of infectious HIV-1 plasma viral load using a boosted in vitro infection protocol. Virology 326( 1): 113– 129. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Salazar-Gonzalez JF, Salazar MG, Keele BF, Learn GH, Giorgi EE, Li H, Decker JM, Wang S, Baalwa J, Kraus MH, et al. 2009. Genetic identity, biological phenotype, and evolutionary pathways of transmitted/founder viruses in acute and early HIV-1 infection. J Exp Med. 206( 6): 1273– 1289. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Seo TK, Thorne JL, Hasegawa M, Kishino H. 2002. A viral sampling design for testing the molecular clock and for estimating evolutionary rates and divergence times. Bioinformatics 18( 1): 115– 123. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Shankarappa R, Margolick JB, Gange SJ, Rodrigo AG, Upchurch D, Farzadegan H, Gupta P, Rinaldo CR, Learn GH, He X, et al. 1999. Consistent viral evolutionary changes associated with the progression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J Virol. 73( 12): 10489– 10502. Google Scholar PubMed Sharp PM, Hahn BH. 2011. Origins of HIV and the AIDS pandemic. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 1( 1): a006841. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Sharp PM, Robertson DL, Gao F, Hahn BH. 1994. Origins and diversity of human immunodeficiency viruses. AIDS 8 (suppl 1): S27– S42. Volz EM, Romero-Severson E, Leitner T. 2017. Phylodynamic inference across epidemic scales. Mol Biol Evol . 34( 5): 1276– 1288. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Vrancken B, Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Drummond A, Baele G, Derdelinckx I, Van Wijngaerden E, Vandamme AM, Van Laethem K, Lemey P. 2014. The genealogical population dynamics of HIV-1 in a large transmission chain: bridging within and among host evolutionary rates. PLoS Comput Biol. 10( 4): e1003505. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Wei X, Decker JM, Wang S, Hui H, Kappes JC, Wu X, Salazar-Gonzalez JF, Salazar MG, Kilby JM, Saag MS, et al. 2003. Antibody neutralization and escape by HIV-1. Nature 422( 6929): 307– 312. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Wolfs TFW, Zwart G, Bakker M, Goudsmit J. 1992. HIV-1 genomic RNA diversification following sexual parenteral virus transmission. Virology 189( 1): 103– 110. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Worobey M, Gemmel M, Teuwen DE, Haselkorn T, Kunstman K, Bunce M, Muyembe JJ, Kabongo JM, Kalengayi RM, Van Marck E, et al. 2008. Direct evidence of extensive diversity of HIV-1 in Kinshasa by 1960. Nature 455( 7213): 661– 664. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Ypma RJ, van Ballegooijen WM, Wallinga J. 2013. Relating phylogenetic trees to transmission trees of infectious disease outbreaks. Genetics 195( 3): 1055– 1062. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Zanini F, Neher RA. 2013. Quantifying selection against synonymous mutations in HIV-1 env evolution. J Virol. 87( 21): 11843– 11850. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Zhang LQ, MacKenzie P, Cleland A, Holmes EC, Brown AJ, Simmonds P. 1993. Selection for specific sequences in the external envelope protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 upon primary infection. J Virol. 67( 6): 3345– 3356. Google Scholar PubMed Zhang M, Foley B, Schultz AK, Macke JP, Bulla I, Stanke M, Morgenstern B, Korber B, Leitner T. 2010. The role of recombination in the emergence of a complex and dynamic HIV epidemic. Retrovirology 7: 25. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Zhuang J, Jetzt AE, Sun G, Yu H, Klarmann G, Ron Y, Preston BD, Dougherty JP. 2002. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 recombination: rate, fidelity, and putative hot spots. J Virol. 76( 22): 11273– 11282. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution 2018.This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices)
Molecular Biology and Evolution – Oxford University Press
Published: Apr 27, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera