Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Kirk Kristofferson, Brent McFerran, Andrea Morales, D. Dahl (2016)
The Dark Side of Scarcity Promotions: How Exposure to Limited-Quantity Promotions Can Induce AggressionJournal of Consumer Research, 43
J. Inman, A. Peter, Priya Raghubir (1997)
Framing the Deal: The Role of Restrictions in Accentuating Deal ValueJournal of Consumer Research, 24
M. Lynn (1989)
Scarcity effects on desirability: mediated by assumed expensiveness?Journal of Economic Psychology, 10
T. Brock, Laura Brannon (1992)
Liberalization of Commodity TheoryBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 13
J. Brehm (1981)
A theory of psychological reactance.
T. Brock (1968)
10 – Implications of Commodity Theory for Value Change1
A. Hayes (2013)
Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach
T. Verhallen, H. Robben (1994)
Scarcity and preference: an experiment on unavailability and product evaluationJournal of Economic Psychology, 15
S. Rivers, V. Reyna, B. Mills (2008)
Risk Taking Under the Influence: A Fuzzy-Trace Theory of Emotion in Adolescence.Developmental review : DR, 28 1
R. Cialdini (1993)
Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion
D. Kahneman, S. Frederick (2002)
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Ted O’Donoghue, M. Rabin (2000)
Choice and Procrastination
Pieters (1998)
Visual Attention During Brand Choice
Amar Cheema, V. Patrick (2008)
Anytime versus Only: Mind-Sets Moderate the Effect of Expansive versus Restrictive Frames on Promotion EvaluationJournal of Marketing Research, 45
S. Worchel, Jerry Lee, Akanbi Adewole (1975)
Effects of Supply and Demand on Ratings of Object ValueJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32
C. Roux, Kelly Goldsmith, Andrea Bonezzi (2015)
On the Psychology of Scarcity: When Reminders of Resource Scarcity Promote Selfish (and Generous) BehaviorInnovation & Management Science eJournal
B. Zeigarnik (1938)
On finished and unfinished tasks.
H. Gierl, Verena Huettl (2010)
Are scarce products always more attractive? The interaction of different types of scarcity signals with products' suitability for conspicuous consumptionInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 27
H. Zur, S. Breznitz (1981)
The effect of time pressure on risky choice behaviorActa Psychologica, 47
Meng Zhu, Rebecca Ratner (2015)
Scarcity Polarizes Preferences: The Impact on Choice among Multiple Items in a Product ClassJournal of Marketing Research, 52
Christopher Hsee, Jiao Zhang (2010)
General Evaluability TheoryPerspectives on Psychological Science, 5
K. Gunaratna (2018)
Development: The Concept
Shanefrederick, Ted Georgeloewenstein, O. Donoghue
Time Discounting and Time Preference : A Critical Review
E. Herpen, R. Pieters, M. Zeelenberg (2009)
When demand accelerates demand: Trailing the bandwagonJournal of Consumer Psychology, 19
Ran Kivetz, Oleg Urminsky, Yuhuang Zheng (2006)
The Goal-Gradient Hypothesis Resurrected: Purchase Acceleration, Illusionary Goal Progress, and Customer RetentionJournal of Marketing Research, 43
C. Brendl, A. Markman, C. Messner, Arthur, B. Markman, J. Bettman, Amitava Chattopadhyay, P. Gollwitzer, Ryan Gossen, J. Irwin, Itamar Simonson, Hunt Stilwell, D. Chung, Billy Dilly, M. Heller, Mareike Messner, Joachim (2003)
The Devaluation Effect: Activating a Need Devalues Unrelated ObjectsJournal of Consumer Research, 29
Elena Reutskaja, R. Nagel, Colin Camerer, A. Rangel (2011)
Search Dynamics in Consumer Choice under Time Pressure: An Eye-Tracking StudyThe American Economic Review, 101
A. Greenwald, T. Brock, T. Ostrom (1968)
Psychological foundations of attitudes
R. Mehta, Meng Zhu (2016)
Creating When You Have Less: The Impact of Resource Scarcity on Product Use CreativityJournal of Consumer Research, 42
J. Jacoby, George Szybillo, C. Berning (1976)
Time and Consumer Behavior: An Interdisciplinary OverviewJournal of Consumer Research, 2
C. Hull (1932)
The goal-gradient hypothesis and maze learning.Psychological Review, 39
R. Petty, J. Cacioppo (1986)
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Anuj Shah, S. Mullainathan, E. Shafir (2012)
Some Consequences of Having Too LittleScience, 338
Melissa Finucane, A. Alhakami, P. Slovic, Stephen Johnson (2000)
The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefitsJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13
Jiwoong Shin, D. Ariely (2004)
Keeping Doors Open: The Effect of Unavailability on Incentives to Keep Options ViableManag. Sci., 50
Li Ma (2016)
Change the Preferences
Christopher Cannon, Kelly Goldsmith, C. Roux (2018)
A Self-Regulatory Model of Resource ScarcityNeuroeconomics eJournal
O. Svenson, A. Edland (1987)
Change of preferences under time pressure: choices and judgementsScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 28
K. Pribram, D. Mcguinness (1975)
Arousal, activation, and effort in the control of attention.Psychological review, 82 2
Christopher Hsee (1998)
Less is Better: When Low-Value Options are Valued More Highly than High-Value Options
Simona Botti, Susan Broniarczyk, G. Häubl, Ron Hill, Yanliu Huang, B. Kahn, P. Kopalle, D. Lehmann, Joel Urbany, B. Wansink (2008)
Choice under restrictionsMarketing Letters, 19
N. Lewis (1935)
A dynamic theory of personality
J. Atkinson (1953)
The achievement motive and recall of interrupted and completed tasks.Journal of experimental psychology, 46 6
Keith Wilcox, Juliano Laran, A. Stephen, P. Zubcsek (2016)
How being busy can increase motivation and reduce task completion time.Journal of personality and social psychology, 110 3
Thomas Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahneman (2002)
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Stephen Spiller, G. Fitzsimons, John Lynch, G. McClelland (2012)
Spotlights, Floodlights, and the Magic Number Zero: Simple Effects Tests in Moderated RegressionJournal of Marketing Research, 50
Samuel McClure, David Laibson, G. Loewenstein, J. Cohen (2004)
Separate Neural Systems Value Immediate and Delayed Monetary RewardsScience, 306
Xin Ge, Paul Messinger, Jin Li (2009)
Influence of Soldout Products on Consumer ChoiceJournal of Retailing, 85
Anuj Shah, E. Shafir, S. Mullainathan (2015)
Scarcity Frames ValuePsychological Science, 26
C. Brainerd, V. Reyna (1990)
Gist is the grist: Fuzzy-trace theory and the new intuitionism☆Developmental Review, 10
O. Svenson, A. Edland, P. Slovic (1990)
Choices and judgments of incompletely described decision alternatives under time pressureActa Psychologica, 75
K. Stanovich, R. West (2000)
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23
George Loewenstein (2009)
Risk as Feelings
Axel Stock, S. Balachander (2005)
The Making of a "Hot Product": A Signaling Explanation of Marketers' Scarcity StrategyManag. Sci., 51
C. Snyder, H. Fromkin (1980)
Uniqueness, the human pursuit of difference
R. Dhar, S. Nowlis (1999)
The Effect of Time Pressure on Consumer Choice DeferralJournal of Consumer Research, 25
In everyday life, people are often faced with choices between tasks of varying levels of urgency and importance. How do people choose? Normatively speaking, people may choose to perform urgent tasks with short completion windows, instead of important tasks with larger outcomes, because important tasks are more difficult and further away from goal completion, urgent tasks involve more immediate and certain payoffs, or people want to finish the urgent tasks first and then work on important tasks later. The current research identifies a mere urgency effect, a tendency to pursue urgency over importance even when these normative reasons are controlled for. Specifically, results from five experiments demonstrate that people are more likely to perform unimportant tasks (i.e., tasks with objectively lower payoffs) over important tasks (i.e., tasks with objectively better payoffs), when the unimportant tasks are characterized merely by spurious urgency (e.g., an illusion of expiration). The mere urgency effect documented in this research violates the basic normative principle of dominance—choosing objectively worse options over objectively better options. People behave as if pursuing an urgent task has its own appeal, independent of its objective consequence.
Journal of Consumer Research – Oxford University Press
Published: Oct 1, 2018
Keywords: mere urgency effect; urgency; importance; task completion window; task payoff; dominance violation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.