Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on glacial isostatic adjustment in West Antarctica

The impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on glacial isostatic adjustment in... Summary Differences in predictions of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) for Antarctica persist due to uncertainties in deglacial history and Earth rheology. The Earth models adopted in many GIA studies are defined by parameters that vary in the radial direction only and represent a global average Earth structure (referred to as 1D Earth models). Over-simplifying actual Earth structure leads to bias in model predictions in regions where Earth parameters differ significantly from the global average, such as West Antarctica. We investigate the impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on GIA in Antarctica by carrying out two experiments that use different rheological approaches to define 3D Earth models that include spatial variations in lithospheric thickness. The first experiment defines an elastic lithosphere with spatial variations in thickness inferred from seismic studies. We compare the results from this 3D model with results derived from a 1D Earth model that has a uniform lithospheric thickness defined as the average of the 3D lithospheric thickness. Irrespective of deglacial history and sub-lithospheric mantle viscosity, we find higher gradients of present-day uplift rates (i.e. higher amplitude and shorter wavelength) in West Antarctica when using the 3D models, due to the thinner-than-1D-average lithosphere prevalent in this region. The second experiment uses seismically-inferred temperature as input to a power-law rheology thereby allowing the lithosphere to have a viscosity structure. Modelling the lithosphere with a power-law rheology results in behaviour that is equivalent to a thinner-lithosphere model, and it leads to higher amplitude and shorter wavelength deformation compared with the first experiment. We conclude that neglecting spatial variations in lithospheric thickness in GIA models will result in predictions of peak uplift and subsidence that are biased low in West Antarctica. This has important implications for ice-sheet modelling studies as the steeper gradients of uplift predicted from the more realistic 3D model may promote stability in marine-grounded regions of West Antarctica. Including lateral variations in lithospheric thickness, at least to the level of considering West and East Antarctica separately, is important for capturing short wavelength deformation and it has the potential to provide a better fit to GPS observations as well as an improved GIA correction for GRACE data. Dynamics of lithosphere and mantle, Rheology: crust and lithosphere, Rheology: mantle, Creep and deformation, Satellite geodesy, Antarctica © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Geophysical Journal International Oxford University Press

The impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on glacial isostatic adjustment in West Antarctica

Download PDF
42 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ou_press/the-impact-of-lateral-variations-in-lithospheric-thickness-on-glacial-nlNatm0257
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society.
ISSN
0956-540X
eISSN
1365-246X
DOI
10.1093/gji/ggy158
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Summary Differences in predictions of Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) for Antarctica persist due to uncertainties in deglacial history and Earth rheology. The Earth models adopted in many GIA studies are defined by parameters that vary in the radial direction only and represent a global average Earth structure (referred to as 1D Earth models). Over-simplifying actual Earth structure leads to bias in model predictions in regions where Earth parameters differ significantly from the global average, such as West Antarctica. We investigate the impact of lateral variations in lithospheric thickness on GIA in Antarctica by carrying out two experiments that use different rheological approaches to define 3D Earth models that include spatial variations in lithospheric thickness. The first experiment defines an elastic lithosphere with spatial variations in thickness inferred from seismic studies. We compare the results from this 3D model with results derived from a 1D Earth model that has a uniform lithospheric thickness defined as the average of the 3D lithospheric thickness. Irrespective of deglacial history and sub-lithospheric mantle viscosity, we find higher gradients of present-day uplift rates (i.e. higher amplitude and shorter wavelength) in West Antarctica when using the 3D models, due to the thinner-than-1D-average lithosphere prevalent in this region. The second experiment uses seismically-inferred temperature as input to a power-law rheology thereby allowing the lithosphere to have a viscosity structure. Modelling the lithosphere with a power-law rheology results in behaviour that is equivalent to a thinner-lithosphere model, and it leads to higher amplitude and shorter wavelength deformation compared with the first experiment. We conclude that neglecting spatial variations in lithospheric thickness in GIA models will result in predictions of peak uplift and subsidence that are biased low in West Antarctica. This has important implications for ice-sheet modelling studies as the steeper gradients of uplift predicted from the more realistic 3D model may promote stability in marine-grounded regions of West Antarctica. Including lateral variations in lithospheric thickness, at least to the level of considering West and East Antarctica separately, is important for capturing short wavelength deformation and it has the potential to provide a better fit to GPS observations as well as an improved GIA correction for GRACE data. Dynamics of lithosphere and mantle, Rheology: crust and lithosphere, Rheology: mantle, Creep and deformation, Satellite geodesy, Antarctica © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Journal

Geophysical Journal International – Oxford University Press

Published: Apr 21, 2018

References

  • Computations of the viscoelastic response of a 3-D compressible Earth to surface loading: an application to Glacial Isostatic Adjustment in Antarctica and Canada
    A
  • Temperature, lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary, and heat flux beneath the Antarctic Plate inferred from seismic velocities
    An
  • S-velocity model and inferred Moho topography beneath the antarctic plate from rayleigh waves
    An
  • The Antarctica component of postglacial rebound model ICE-6G_C (VM5a) based on GPS positioning, exposure age dating of ice thicknesses, and relative sea level histories
    Argus
  • Iceland rising: solid Earth response to ice retreat inferred from satellite radar interferometry and visocelastic modeling
    Auriac
  • Lateral, radial, and temporal variations in upper mantle viscosity and rheology under Scandinavia
    Barnhoorn
  • How to evaluate model-derived deglaciation chronologies: a case study using Antarctica
    Briggs
  • Variability in the mass flux of the Ross ice streams, West Antarctica, over the last millennium
    Catania
  • Preliminary reference Earth model
    Dziewonski
  • The elusive lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary (LAB) beneath cratons
    Eaton
  • On
    Farrell
  • A coupled ice sheet-sea level model incorporating 3D Earth structure: variations in Antarctica during the last deglacial retreat
    Gomez
  • Sea level as a stabilizing factor for marine-ice-sheet grounding lines
    Gomez
  • Sea-level feedback lowers projections of future Antarctic Ice-Sheet mass loss
    Gomez
  • A 3-D coupled ice sheet – sea level model applied to Antarctica through the last 40 ky
    Gomez
  • Mantle shear–wave tomography and the fate of subducted slabs
    Grand
  • Upper mantle structure of central and West Antarctica from array analysis of Rayleigh wave phase velocities
    Heeszel