44 and 55 d was 48 broilers, which was the cause of the There were a total of 18 (not 16) out of the discrepancy. 48 control-fed broilers confirmed positive for cecal 3. Table 4 columns Salmonella from litter positive pens. An arithmeti- As indicated in the results text, 45.83% of broilers cal error was made when adding the number of from the 0 g/MT RFC treatment group were confirmed broilers confirmed ceca positive at 44 d (11 broil- as having Salmonella spp. presence in the ceca at 44 d. ers) and 55 d (7 broilers). These numbers were de- At 55 d, there was 29.17% prevalence in this treatment scribed correctly in the results text of the original group. The 44 d and 55 d columns were switched during article. table formatting. 2018 Poultry Science Association Inc. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ps/article-abstract/97/4/1469/4939131 by Ed 'DeepDyve' Gillespie user on 22 March 2018
Poultry Science – Oxford University Press
Published: Apr 1, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.
Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.
It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera