AbstractOBJECTIVE:This study compared the electroencephalographic (EEG) changes occurring during carotid occlusion in 225 consecutive patients undergoing carotid endarterectomies performed by two surgeons, one using local and the other using general anesthesia.METHODS:A retrospective review of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomies for carotid occlusive disease was conducted. EEG changes associated with intraoperative ischemia (decreased amplitude, generalized slowing, and loss of fast activity) resulting in the need for an indwelling arterial shunt were recorded for the two anesthesia groups. To determine the similarities or differences between the two groups, the groups were compared regarding age, risk factors, and indications for surgery.RESULTS:Significant EEG changes were noted in 6 of 96 patients (6.3%) in the local anesthesia group versus 19 of 121 patients (15.7%) in the general anesthesia group. EEG changes consisted solely of generalized slowing in the local anesthesia group, whereas a more varied spectrum was observed in the general anesthesia group. The two groups were similar regarding age and risk factors. Although the local anesthesia group had more asymptomatic patients, symptomatic patients did not have a greater incidence of EEG changes.CONCLUSION:There is a large difference in EEG changes potentially requiring shunt placement in patients undergoing surgery while under local (6.3%) versus general (15.7%) anesthesia. This could not be explained based on age, risk factors, interpretation of EEG findings, or indications between the two groups. We conclude that EEG monitoring may be insensitive and may fail to detect ischemia in patients who are under regional anesthesia. Alternately, the presence of general anesthetics may alter the character of the EEG findings and increase the sensitivity of EEG monitoring to ischemic events.
Neurosurgery – Oxford University Press
Published: Oct 1, 1998
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera