The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn. By Margaret Willes

The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn. By Margaret Willes As close friends, dedicated diarists, and two of the most energetic figures to populate seventeenth-century London, Pepys and Evelyn make fitting subjects for a joint biography. Both were active members of the Royal Society and keen to sample the delights—music, exotic imports, plays, books—that their world had to offer. Aiming for a wide readership, Margaret Willes's book takes us through these aspects of their lives, drawing on existing work on Pepys and Evelyn by writers such as Claire Tomalin, Giles Mandelbrote, and Frances Harris. This approach initially seems promising, but it is in the use of its sources that this book is deeply flawed, as studies on which the discussion is based frequently go unacknowledged. Sometimes the use of secondary sources takes the form of near word-for-word copying. For example, the Companion volume to the complete edition of Pepys's diary has an essay on ‘Music’ by Richard Luckett with this passage: ‘The Italians insisted on special methods of payment to ensure that they would receive money regularly; Charles sold four gondolas, which had been presented to him by the Venetian republic to mark his restoration, in order to float the enterprise’ (The Diary of Samuel Pepys, ed. Robert Latham and William Matthews, London, 1983, vol. 10, p. 266). The chapter on ‘pleasure’ in Willes's book states, with no reference to Luckett: ‘The canny Italian musicians insisted on special methods of payment to ensure that they would receive money regularly, so Charles sold four gondolas that had been presented to him by the Venetian Republic to fund the enterprise’ (p. 134). More often, the argument will follow that of another writer, condensing and slightly adapting phrases as it goes. By way of illustration, Claire Tomalin's biography of Pepys recounts how ‘He haunted the shops of instrument-makers in Long Acre, Aldgate and Chancery Lane, men who made microscopes, slide rules, thermometers, telescopes and devices for drawing in perspective; he bought himself a microscope in 1664 and acquired scientific books. He watched private experiments undertaken by his friends Pearse, the surgeon, and Dr Clarke, who administered opium to dogs and dissected them. […] He enjoyed conversation with men whose minds travelled along original lines: at the coffee house William Petty stirred his imagination …’ (Samuel Pepys: The Unequalled Self, London, 2002, p.254). Willes echoes: ‘Pepys haunted the shops of instrument makers, purchasing microscopes, thermometers, and devices for drawing in perspective. Following his visit to the Royal Society with Greatorex, he attended private experiments performed by friends such as Dr Clarke, who administered opium to dogs and then dissected the animals. As a convivial man, Pepys enjoyed conversing in coffee-houses with men with original minds. One man with a truly remarkable originality of mind was William Petty …’ (p. 111). The only citation in The Curious World at this point is to an entry in Pepys's diary—the same one cited by Tomalin. This proves a common pattern: while footnotes are present, they generally refer to the primary sources, not the secondary sources from which the primary examples, and arguments and phrases surrounding them, were evidently derived. Due warning is needed that unsourced paraphrase, sometimes extending to word- for-word copying, is present in the chapter on libraries. Phrases and information from several works on Pepys's and Evelyn's books appear without note of the debt to sources at those points. Indeed, I found myself reading pages that repeated arguments and lengthy phrases from my 2015 monograph Samuel Pepys and his Books, with no signal that my work was the source. (For example, Pepys and his Books, pp.26, 28, 146, 32; compare, respectively, Curious World, pp.227–8, 229, 230). Particularly concerning is the fact that, in at least one case, as-yet-unpublished research has also been included without acknowledgement. I was, to say the least, surprised to find that Willes's conclusion to the book (pp. 251–2) contains two arguments taken from the conclusion to a paper that I gave at the History of Libraries Seminar in London (7 June 2016) on Pepys and Restoration collecting, which Willes attended. These points concerned the role of one of Pepys's relatives, Anne Jackson, in ensuring the survival of his library and, in particular, how the conditions of Pepys's will were intended to secure sympathetic future readers for his diary and other library papers: readers who, like him, would be male, Cambridge scholars and sufficiently diligent to decode his shorthand. The failure to acknowledge the source in this case raises concerns about whether the same may also have happened with others’ unpublished work. Ultimately, therefore, it is very difficult to assess what the author has herself contributed to discussion of Pepys and Evelyn's libraries, or other matters. Histories aimed at a general audience may allowably be lighter on discursive footnotes than works aimed largely at researchers, and Willes has clearly put effort into synthesizing existing studies into a narrative for general readers. Yet this book should not have been issued in its current state—and it is even more worrying that it was published under the auspices of a university press. A valuable opportunity has been missed. © The Author 2018; all rights reserved This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices) http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Library Oxford University Press

The Curious World of Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn. By Margaret Willes

The Library , Volume 19 (1) – Mar 1, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ou_press/the-curious-world-of-samuel-pepys-and-john-evelyn-by-margaret-willes-NRkoqUJvoe
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author 2018; all rights reserved
ISSN
0024-2160
eISSN
1744-8581
D.O.I.
10.1093/library/19.1.86
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

As close friends, dedicated diarists, and two of the most energetic figures to populate seventeenth-century London, Pepys and Evelyn make fitting subjects for a joint biography. Both were active members of the Royal Society and keen to sample the delights—music, exotic imports, plays, books—that their world had to offer. Aiming for a wide readership, Margaret Willes's book takes us through these aspects of their lives, drawing on existing work on Pepys and Evelyn by writers such as Claire Tomalin, Giles Mandelbrote, and Frances Harris. This approach initially seems promising, but it is in the use of its sources that this book is deeply flawed, as studies on which the discussion is based frequently go unacknowledged. Sometimes the use of secondary sources takes the form of near word-for-word copying. For example, the Companion volume to the complete edition of Pepys's diary has an essay on ‘Music’ by Richard Luckett with this passage: ‘The Italians insisted on special methods of payment to ensure that they would receive money regularly; Charles sold four gondolas, which had been presented to him by the Venetian republic to mark his restoration, in order to float the enterprise’ (The Diary of Samuel Pepys, ed. Robert Latham and William Matthews, London, 1983, vol. 10, p. 266). The chapter on ‘pleasure’ in Willes's book states, with no reference to Luckett: ‘The canny Italian musicians insisted on special methods of payment to ensure that they would receive money regularly, so Charles sold four gondolas that had been presented to him by the Venetian Republic to fund the enterprise’ (p. 134). More often, the argument will follow that of another writer, condensing and slightly adapting phrases as it goes. By way of illustration, Claire Tomalin's biography of Pepys recounts how ‘He haunted the shops of instrument-makers in Long Acre, Aldgate and Chancery Lane, men who made microscopes, slide rules, thermometers, telescopes and devices for drawing in perspective; he bought himself a microscope in 1664 and acquired scientific books. He watched private experiments undertaken by his friends Pearse, the surgeon, and Dr Clarke, who administered opium to dogs and dissected them. […] He enjoyed conversation with men whose minds travelled along original lines: at the coffee house William Petty stirred his imagination …’ (Samuel Pepys: The Unequalled Self, London, 2002, p.254). Willes echoes: ‘Pepys haunted the shops of instrument makers, purchasing microscopes, thermometers, and devices for drawing in perspective. Following his visit to the Royal Society with Greatorex, he attended private experiments performed by friends such as Dr Clarke, who administered opium to dogs and then dissected the animals. As a convivial man, Pepys enjoyed conversing in coffee-houses with men with original minds. One man with a truly remarkable originality of mind was William Petty …’ (p. 111). The only citation in The Curious World at this point is to an entry in Pepys's diary—the same one cited by Tomalin. This proves a common pattern: while footnotes are present, they generally refer to the primary sources, not the secondary sources from which the primary examples, and arguments and phrases surrounding them, were evidently derived. Due warning is needed that unsourced paraphrase, sometimes extending to word- for-word copying, is present in the chapter on libraries. Phrases and information from several works on Pepys's and Evelyn's books appear without note of the debt to sources at those points. Indeed, I found myself reading pages that repeated arguments and lengthy phrases from my 2015 monograph Samuel Pepys and his Books, with no signal that my work was the source. (For example, Pepys and his Books, pp.26, 28, 146, 32; compare, respectively, Curious World, pp.227–8, 229, 230). Particularly concerning is the fact that, in at least one case, as-yet-unpublished research has also been included without acknowledgement. I was, to say the least, surprised to find that Willes's conclusion to the book (pp. 251–2) contains two arguments taken from the conclusion to a paper that I gave at the History of Libraries Seminar in London (7 June 2016) on Pepys and Restoration collecting, which Willes attended. These points concerned the role of one of Pepys's relatives, Anne Jackson, in ensuring the survival of his library and, in particular, how the conditions of Pepys's will were intended to secure sympathetic future readers for his diary and other library papers: readers who, like him, would be male, Cambridge scholars and sufficiently diligent to decode his shorthand. The failure to acknowledge the source in this case raises concerns about whether the same may also have happened with others’ unpublished work. Ultimately, therefore, it is very difficult to assess what the author has herself contributed to discussion of Pepys and Evelyn's libraries, or other matters. Histories aimed at a general audience may allowably be lighter on discursive footnotes than works aimed largely at researchers, and Willes has clearly put effort into synthesizing existing studies into a narrative for general readers. Yet this book should not have been issued in its current state—and it is even more worrying that it was published under the auspices of a university press. A valuable opportunity has been missed. © The Author 2018; all rights reserved This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices)

Journal

The LibraryOxford University Press

Published: Mar 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off