Survival of patients with prior anti-angiogenic therapy

Survival of patients with prior anti-angiogenic therapy We read with interest the report by Cloughesy et al on the activity of cabozantinib in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients with prior anti-angiogenic therapy.1 In their subset analysis, they reported overall survival (OS) results using 2 different cabozantinib doses: 4.1 months (95% CI: 1.4–16.7) in the 140 mg group (n = 12); 4.6 (95% CI: 2.9–5.6) in the 100 mg group (n = 58); OS for combined groups was 4.6 months. Of the 70 patients in the analysis, 57 (81%) with prior anti-angiogenic therapy had bevacizumab (BEV). In their discussion, the authors raise the issue of “how best to define a meaningful response (eg, objective response rate, progression-free survival).”1 We argue, because of the vagaries in interpreting MRIs in patients receiving BEV or other anti-angiogenic agents, the most meaningful endpoint is OS. Relative to this, we suggest literature can provide a valuable benchmark, as the OS outcome for these patients tends to be relatively uniform. Such a review of the literature2 exemplifies this argument and compares well with the reported results in the cabozantinib study (ie, group 3 below): A total of 2388 patients from 53 arms of 42 studies were analyzed in 3 groups2: Group 1: Thirty-two studies in which survival post-BEV was determined by subtracting PFS from OS (2045 patients); OS post-BEV = 3.36 months (95% CI: 3.12–3.66) Group 2: Two studies (94 patients) in which OS post-BEV is reported: OS = 3.26 (95% CI: 2.394.42) Group 3: Eight studies of salvage therapy after progression on BEV (249 patients): OS post-BEV = 4.46 months (95% CI: 3.68–5.54). Funding This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute CORE grant (no. 4P 30 CA014520). References 1. Cloughesy TF, Drappatz J, de Groot J, et al.   Phase II study of cabozantinib in patients with progressive glioblastoma: subset analysis of patients with prior antiangiogenic therapy. Neuro Oncol . 2018; 20( 2): 259– 267. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed  2. Tipping M, Eickhoff J, Ian Robins H. Clinical outcomes in recurrent glioblastoma with bevacizumab therapy: an analysis of the literature. J Clin Neurosci . 2017; 44: 101– 106. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed  © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices) http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Neuro-Oncology Oxford University Press

Survival of patients with prior anti-angiogenic therapy

Neuro-Oncology , Volume Advance Article (6) – Mar 27, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ou_press/survival-of-patients-with-prior-anti-angiogenic-therapy-SVMVgg0EmH
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com
ISSN
1522-8517
eISSN
1523-5866
D.O.I.
10.1093/neuonc/noy039
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We read with interest the report by Cloughesy et al on the activity of cabozantinib in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients with prior anti-angiogenic therapy.1 In their subset analysis, they reported overall survival (OS) results using 2 different cabozantinib doses: 4.1 months (95% CI: 1.4–16.7) in the 140 mg group (n = 12); 4.6 (95% CI: 2.9–5.6) in the 100 mg group (n = 58); OS for combined groups was 4.6 months. Of the 70 patients in the analysis, 57 (81%) with prior anti-angiogenic therapy had bevacizumab (BEV). In their discussion, the authors raise the issue of “how best to define a meaningful response (eg, objective response rate, progression-free survival).”1 We argue, because of the vagaries in interpreting MRIs in patients receiving BEV or other anti-angiogenic agents, the most meaningful endpoint is OS. Relative to this, we suggest literature can provide a valuable benchmark, as the OS outcome for these patients tends to be relatively uniform. Such a review of the literature2 exemplifies this argument and compares well with the reported results in the cabozantinib study (ie, group 3 below): A total of 2388 patients from 53 arms of 42 studies were analyzed in 3 groups2: Group 1: Thirty-two studies in which survival post-BEV was determined by subtracting PFS from OS (2045 patients); OS post-BEV = 3.36 months (95% CI: 3.12–3.66) Group 2: Two studies (94 patients) in which OS post-BEV is reported: OS = 3.26 (95% CI: 2.394.42) Group 3: Eight studies of salvage therapy after progression on BEV (249 patients): OS post-BEV = 4.46 months (95% CI: 3.68–5.54). Funding This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute CORE grant (no. 4P 30 CA014520). References 1. Cloughesy TF, Drappatz J, de Groot J, et al.   Phase II study of cabozantinib in patients with progressive glioblastoma: subset analysis of patients with prior antiangiogenic therapy. Neuro Oncol . 2018; 20( 2): 259– 267. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed  2. Tipping M, Eickhoff J, Ian Robins H. Clinical outcomes in recurrent glioblastoma with bevacizumab therapy: an analysis of the literature. J Clin Neurosci . 2017; 44: 101– 106. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed  © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices)

Journal

Neuro-OncologyOxford University Press

Published: Mar 27, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off