Add Journal to My Library
International Mathematics Research Notices
, Volume 2018 (5) – Mar 1, 2018

43 pages

/lp/ou_press/simple-lie-algebras-and-topological-odes-hlpSJnK7G9

- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Copyright
- © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.
- ISSN
- 1073-7928
- eISSN
- 1687-0247
- D.O.I.
- 10.1093/imrn/rnw285
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract For a simple Lie algebra $$\mathfrak{g}$$ we define a system of linear ODEs with polynomial coefficients, which we call the topological equation of $$\mathfrak{g}$$-type. The dimension of the space of solutions regular at infinity is equal to the rank of the Lie algebra. For the simplest example $$\mathfrak{g}=sl_2(\mathbb C)$$ the regular solution can be expressed via products of Airy functions and their derivatives; this matrix-valued function was used in our previous work [4] for computing logarithmic derivatives of the Witten–Kontsevich tau-function. For an arbitrary simple Lie algebra we construct a basis in the space of regular solutions to the topological equation called generalized Airy resolvents. We also outline applications of the generalized Airy resolvents for computing the Witten and Fan–Jarvis–Ruan invariants of the Deligne–Mumford moduli spaces of stable algebraic curves. 1 Introduction In this paper to an arbitrary simple Lie algebra we will associate two families of special functions defined by certain systems of linear ODEs with polynomial coefficients along with appropriate asymptotic conditions. Let us begin with the first family. 1.1 Topological ODE and generalized Airy resolvents Let $$(\mathfrak{g},[\cdot,\cdot])$$ be a simple Lie algebra over $$\mathbb{C}$$ of rank $$n$$. We sometimes refer to elements of $$\mathfrak{g}$$ as matrices, even if the constructions will not depend on the choice of a matrix realization of the Lie algebra. Choose $$\mathfrak{h}$$ a Cartan subalgebra of $$\mathfrak{g}$$, $$\Pi=\{\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_n\}\subset\mathfrak{h}^*$$ a set of simple roots, and $$\triangle\subset \mathfrak{h}^*$$ the root system. Then $$\mathfrak{g}$$ admits the root space decomposition g=h⊕⨁α∈△gα, (1.1) where $$\mathfrak{g}_\alpha=\{x\in \mathfrak{g} \, | \,[h,x]=\alpha(h)\,x, \, \forall \, h\in \mathfrak{h}\}.$$ Let $$\theta$$ be the highest root w.r.t. $$\Pi$$. Denote by $$(\cdot|\cdot): \mathfrak{g} \times\mathfrak{g}\rightarrow \mathbb{C}$$ the normalized Cartan–Killing form [24] such that $$(\theta|\theta)=2.$$ For any root $$\alpha$$, let $$H_{\alpha}\in \mathfrak{h}$$ denote the root vector of $$\alpha$$ w.r.t. $$(\cdot|\cdot)$$. Choose a set of Weyl generators $$E_i\in\mathfrak{g}_{\alpha_i},\,F_i\in\mathfrak{g}_{-\alpha_i}$$, $$H_i={2H_{\alpha_i}}/{(\alpha_i|\alpha_i)}$$ satisfying [Ei,Fi]=Hi,[Hi,Ej]=AijEj,[Hi,Fj]=−AijFj, (1.2) where $$(A_{ij})$$ denotes the Cartan matrix associated with $$\mathfrak{g}$$. In (1.2) and throughout this paper we will follow the convention that, free Latin indices take integer values from $$1$$ to $$n$$ unless otherwise indicated. Choose $$E_{-\theta}\in \mathfrak{g}_{-\theta},\, E_\theta \in\mathfrak{g}_\theta$$. They can be normalized by the conditions $$(E_\theta\,|\,E_{-\theta})=1$$ and $$\omega(E_{-\theta})=-E_\theta$$, where $$\omega:\mathfrak{g}\to\mathfrak{g}$$ is the Chevalley involution. Let $$I_+:=\sum_{i=1}^n E_i$$ be a principal nilpotent element of $$\mathfrak{g}$$. Define Λ=I++λE−θ. (1.3) Consider the following differential equation for a $$\mathfrak{g}$$-valued function $$M=M(\lambda)$$ of an independent variable $$\lambda$$ M′=[M,Λ],′=ddλ. (1.4) Definition 1.1. We call eq. (1.4) the topological differential equation (in short: topological ODE) of $$\mathfrak{g}$$-type. Solutions of the differential equation (1.4) are entire functions of the complex variable $$\lambda$$. At $$\lambda=\infty$$ they may have a singularity. A solution $$M(\lambda)$$ is called regular if it grows at most polynomially at $$|\lambda|\to\infty$$ within a certain chosen sector of the complex $$\lambda$$-plane. Denote by $$\mathfrak{S}_\infty^{{\rm reg}}(\mathfrak{g})$$ the vector space of regular solutions to (1.4). Our goal is to describe the space $$\mathfrak{S}_\infty^{\rm reg}(\mathfrak{g})$$ for an arbitrary simple Lie algebra $$\mathfrak{g}$$. Actually, we will only deal with asymptotic expansions of regular solutions without entering into details about the region of their validity that can be described by means of standard techniques of asymptotic analysis of ODEs (see, e.g., [34]). As a way of introductory example we consider now the simplest instance $$\mathfrak{g}=sl_2(\mathbb C)$$. In this case $$\Lambda=\left({0 \atop \lambda} \quad {1 \atop 0}\right)$$. Write $$M(\lambda)=\left({a(\lambda) \atop c(\lambda)}\quad {b(\lambda) \atop -a(\lambda)}\right)$$. The equation (1.4) reads (a′b′c′)=(0λ−1200−2λ00)(abc). (1.5) The type of behavior at infinity is essentially specified by the eigenvalues of the matrix of coefficients. In this case they are equal to 0 and $$\pm 2\sqrt{\lambda}$$. Solutions corresponding to the non-zero eigenvalues have an essential singularity $$\sim \lambda^{-\frac12}{\rm e}^{\pm \frac43 \lambda^{3/2}}$$ at infinity. The regular solution is unique up to a constant factor. It corresponds to the eigenvector with eigenvalue zero. The solution has the form M(λ)=λ−122(−12∑g=1∞(6g−5)!!96g−1⋅(g−1)!λ−3g+22∑g=0∞(6g−1)!!96g⋅g!λ−3g−2∑g=0∞6g+16g−1(6g−1)!!96g⋅g!λ−3g+112∑g=1∞(6g−5)!!96g−1⋅(g−1)!λ−3g+2). (1.6) This matrix-valued function appeared in our paper [4]. It was used, in a slightly modified normalization, as key tool within an efficient algorithm for computation of intersection numbers of tautological classes on the Deligne–Mumford moduli spaces (see eq. (5.14)). The topological ODE for the Lie algebra $$sl_2(\mathbb C)$$ is closely related to the theory of Airy functions. Indeed, from (1.5) it readily follows that a=12b′,c=−12b″+λb (1.7) while for $$b=b(\lambda)$$ one arrives at a third-order ODE −12b‴+2λb′+b=0. (1.8) Solutions to this equation are products of solutions to the Airy equation y″=λy. (1.9) That is, $$b(\lambda)$$ is the diagonal value of the resolvent of the Airy equation. The matrix $$M(\lambda)$$ can also be considered as resolvent of the matrix version of the Airy equation [ddλ+(01λ0)]y→=0,y→=(y−y′). (1.10) Let us proceed now with the general case. The eigenvectors of the matrix of coefficients of the system (1.4) with zero eigenvalue correspond to matrices commuting with $$\Lambda$$. As observed in [27], the kernel of the linear operator adΛ(λ0):g→g for any $$\lambda_0\in \mathbb{C}$$ has dimension $$n={\rm rk}\,\mathfrak{g}$$. This suggests that the dimension of the space of regular solutions to the topological ODE (1.4) is equal to $$n$$. We show in Theorem 1.2 that this is the case indeed. Moreover, we will construct a particular basis in the space $$\mathfrak{S}_\infty^{\rm reg}(\mathfrak{g})$$. To this end denote $$L(\mathfrak{g})=\mathfrak{g} \otimes \mathbb{C}[\lambda, \lambda^{-1}]$$ the loop algebra of $$\mathfrak{g}$$. Introduce the principal gradation on the Lie algebra $$L(\mathfrak{g})$$ in the following way: degEi=1, degHi=0, degFi=−1, i=1,…,n,degλ=h. (1.11) Here $$h$$ is the Coxeter number of $$\mathfrak{g}$$. According to this gradation we have $$\deg \Lambda=1.$$ Recall [23] that $$\mathrm{Ker} \, \mathrm {ad}_\Lambda\subset L(\mathfrak{g})$$ has the following decomposition KeradΛ=⨁j∈ECΛj,degΛj=j∈E:=⨆i=1n(mi+hZ), (1.12) where the integers 1=m1<m2≤⋯≤mn−1<mn=h−1 (1.13) are the exponents of $$\mathfrak{g}$$. The matrices $$\Lambda_i$$ commute pairwise [Λi,Λj]=0,∀i,j∈E. (1.14) They can be normalized in such a way [24, 25] that Λma+kh=Λmaλk,k∈Z, (1.15) (Λma|Λmb)=hλδa+b,n+1. (1.16) In particular, we choose $$\Lambda_1=\Lambda.$$ Theorem 1.2. (1) $$\dim_\mathbb{C}\mathfrak{S}_\infty^{\rm reg}(\mathfrak{g})={\rm rk}\, \mathfrak{g}.$$ (2) There exists a unique basis $$M_1(\lambda)$$, $$\dots$$, $$M_n(\lambda)$$ in the space $$\mathfrak{S}_\infty^{\rm reg}(\mathfrak{g})$$ of the form Ma(λ)=λ−mah[Λma+∑k=1∞Ma,k(λ)],Ma,k(λ)∈L(g),degMa,k(λ)=ma−(h+1)k,a=1,…,n. (1.17) □ The proof is given in Section 2. Definition 1.3. The solutions (1.17) to the topological ODE of $$\mathfrak{g}$$-type are called generalized Airy resolvents of $$\mathfrak{g}$$-type. □ The topological ODE (1.4) can be recast into the form [ddλ+Λ,M]=0. (1.18) Using such a representation along with (1.14), (1.16) as well as the invariance property of the Cartan–Killing form one arrives at Proposition 1.4. The generalized Airy resolvents commute pairwise [Ma(λ),Mb(λ)]=0,a,b=1,…,n. (1.19) Moreover, $$(M_a(\lambda)\,|\,M_b(\lambda))=h\,\delta_{a+b, n+1}.$$ □ Example 1.5. Consider the $$A_n$$ case, $$\mathfrak{g}=sl_{n+1}(\mathbb C)$$. The $$(n+1)\times (n+1)$$ matrix $$\Lambda$$ reads Λ=(010⋯0001⋱0⋮⋱⋱⋱⋮00⋱⋱1λ00⋯0). The exponents are $$m_a=a$$, $$a=1, \dots, n$$, the Coxeter number is $$h=n+1$$. One can choose Λi=Λi,i=1,…,n. Then Ma(λ)=λ−an+1[Λa+1(n+1)λ∑ν=1nζνa−14sin2πνn+1ΩνΛa−1+…], (1.20) where $$\zeta={\rm e}^{\frac{2\pi i}{n+1}}$$ is a root of unity, $$\Omega_\nu={\rm diag}\left(1, \zeta^\nu, \zeta^{2\nu}, \dots , \zeta^{n\, \nu}\right)\!.$$ The recursion procedure for computing subsequent terms will be explained below, see Example 2.4. In the particular case $$n=1$$ one obtains the solution (1.6). □ The recursive procedure for computing the series expansions of the generalized Airy resolvents outlined in the Example 1.5 can be represented in an alternative form. The basic idea can be already seen from the $$sl_2(\mathbb C)$$ example: the topological ODE for a matrix-valued function reduces to a scalar differential equation (1.8) for one of the entries of the matrix (called $$b(\lambda)$$ above); other matrix entries are expressed in terms of $$b(\lambda)$$ and its derivatives (see eq. (1.7)). Let us explain a general method for reducing the topological ODE for an arbitrary simple Lie algebra of rank $$n$$ to a system of ODEs with $$n$$ dependent variables. To this end we will use the Jordan decomposition of the operator $$\mathrm {ad}_{I_+}$$ described hereafter. Let $$\rho^\vee\in \mathfrak{h}$$ be the Weyl co-vector of $$\mathfrak{g}$$, whose defining equations are αi(ρ∨)=1,i=1,…,n. (1.21) Write $$\rho^\vee=\sum_{i=1}^n x_i \,H_i,\,x_i\in\mathbb{C}$$ and define $$I_-=2\sum_{i=1}^n x_i \,F_i.$$ Then $$I_+,I_-,\rho^\vee$$ form an $$sl_2(\mathbb{C})$$ Lie algebra: [ρ∨,I+]=I+,[ρ∨,I−]=−I−,[I+,I−]=2ρ∨. (1.22) According to [2, 27], there exist elements $$\gamma^1,\dots,\gamma^n\in \mathfrak{g}$$ such that KeradI−=SpanC{γ1,…,γn},[ρ∨,γi]=−miγi. (1.23) Fix $$\{\gamma^1,\dots,\gamma^n\}$$, then the lowest weight decomposition of $$\mathfrak{g}$$ has the form g=⨁i=1nLi,Li=SpanC{γi,adI+γi,…,adI+2miγi}. (1.24) Here each $$\mathcal L^i$$ is an $$sl_2(\mathbb{C})$$-module. Any $$\mathfrak{g}$$-valued function $$M(\lambda)$$ can be uniquely represented in the form M(λ)=∑i=1nSi(λ)adI+2miγi+∑i=1n∑m=02mi−1Kim(λ)adI+mγi, (1.25) where $$S_{i}(\lambda)$$, $$K_{im}(\lambda)$$ are certain complex-valued functions. Note that $$\mathrm {ad}_{I_+}^{2m_i} \gamma^i$$ is the highest weight vector of $$\mathcal L^i$$, $$i=1,\dots, n$$. Theorem 1.6. Let $$M$$ be any solution of (1.4). The functions $$K_{im}$$ have the following expressions: Kim=(−1)mSi(2mi−m)+∑u=1n∑v=02mi−1−mkimuv0Su(v)+λ∑u=1n∑v=0mi−1−mkimuv1Su(v), m=0,…,mi−1;Kim=(−1)mSi(2mi−m), m=mi,…,2mi−1 (1.26) with constant coefficients $$k_{imuv}^0,\,k_{imuv}^1$$ independent of the choice of the solution $$M.$$ Moreover, the topological ODE (1.4) is equivalent to a system of linear ODEs for $$S_1,\dots,S_n$$ of the form Si(2mi+1)=∑u=1n∑v=02mikiuv0Su(v)+λ∑u=1n∑v=1mikiuv1Su(v),i=1,…,n. (1.27) Here $$k_{iuv}^0,\,k_{iuv}^1$$ are constants independent of the choice of the solution $$M.$$ □ The proof is given in Section 3. The coefficients $$k^0_{iuv}$$, $$k^1_{iuv}$$ coincide with $$k^0_{imuv}$$, $$k^1_{imuv}$$ at $$m=-1$$. See details in the proof. We call eqs. (1.27) the reduced topological ODEs of $$\mathfrak{g}$$-type. Denote by $$S_{a;1}(\lambda), \dots, S_{a;n}(\lambda)$$ the $$S$$-coefficients in the decomposition (1.25) of the generalized Airy resolvent $$M_a(\lambda)$$, $$a=1, \dots, n$$. Definition 1.7. The series $$S_{a; i}(\lambda)$$ are called essential series of $$\mathfrak{g}$$-type. □ Example 1.8 (The $$A_1$$ case). The essential series $$S_{1;1}$$ coincides with the $$(1,2)$$-entry of the Airy resolvent (1.6) (the function $$b(\lambda)$$ in (1.5)). The expression (1.26) is given explicitly by (1.7). □ Example 1.9. (The $$A_2$$ case). The decomposition (1.25) reads M=(2K11+K22−2S1−3K236S22K10+K21−2K223K23−2S1K202K10−K21−2K11+K22). (1.28) The expression (1.26) is given explicitly by K10=S1″+3λS2,K11=−S1′, (1.29) K20=S2(4)−2λS1, K21=−S2‴, K22=S2″, K23=−S2′. (1.30) The reduced equations (1.27) read 6S2+2S1(3)+9λS2′=0, (1.31) 2S1+2S1(4)+15S2′−S2(5)+λ(9S2″+6S1′)=0. (1.32) Explicit expressions of the essential series $$S_{a;j}$$ of the $$A_2$$-type can be found in Section 5. □ Proposition 1.10. (1) For any $$a\in\{1,2,\dots n\}$$, the essential series $$S_{a;i}$$ satisfy (i) Sa;1(λ),…,Sa;n(λ)∈λ−mah⋅C[[λ−1]];(ii) the vectors (Sa;i)i=1…n,a=1,…,n are linearly independent;(iii) Sa;a is non-zero. (2) Let $$\mathfrak{g}\neq D_{n=2k}$$ and $$M$$ be a regular solution of the topological ODE (1.4) such that the $$S_a$$-coefficient of $$M$$ coincides with $$S_{a;a}$$; then $$M=M_a.$$ If $$\mathfrak{g}$$ is of type $$D_{n}$$ with $$n$$ even, the statement remains valid for $$a\not\in\{n/2, n/2+1\}$$, and it should be modified for $$a=n/2$$ and $$a=n/2+1$$ in the following way: $$M=M_a$$ if the $$S_{n/2},\,S_{n/2+1}$$-coefficients of $$M$$ coincide with $$S_{a;n/2}$$, $$S_{a;n/2+1}$$, respectively. □ The proof will be given in Section 3. We call $$S_{a;a},\,a=1,\dots,n$$ the fundamental series of $$\mathfrak{g}$$-type. 1.2 Dual topological ODE and its normal form Solutions to (1.4) can be expressed by a suitable integral transform via another class of functions satisfying somewhat simpler differential equations. These functions will be constructed as solutions to another system of linear ODEs for a $$\mathfrak{g}$$-valued function $$G=G(x)$$, $$x\in\mathbb C$$. In the notations of the previous section it reads [G′,E−θ]+[G,I+]+xG=0,′=ddx. (1.33) Definition 1.11. We call equation (1.33) the dual topological differential equation (dual topological ODE for short). The space of solutions of (1.33) is denoted by $$\mathcal{G}(\mathfrak{g}).$$ □ Solutions to the dual topological ODE are related with the generalized Airy resolvents by the following Laplace–Borel transform: M(λ)=∫CG(x)e−λxdx, (1.34) where $$C$$ is a suitable contour on the complex $$x$$-plane, which can depend on the choice of a solution $$M(\lambda)\in\mathfrak{S}_\infty^{\rm reg}(\mathfrak{g})$$. Example 1.12. For $$\mathfrak{g}=sl_2(\mathbb C)$$ the dual topological equation for the matrix-valued function $$G=\left({\alpha(x) \atop \gamma(x)}\quad{\beta(x) \atop -\alpha(x)}\right)$$ reduces to β′=(x24−12x)β. (1.35) This yields the following integral representation for solutions to the differential equation (1.8) b(λ)=1π∫0∞ex312−λxdxx. (1.36) Here and below the Laplace-type integrals are understood in a formal sense by applying a term-by-term integration 1π∫0∞ex312−λxdxx=1π∑k=0∞∫0∞1k!(x312)ke−λxdxx=1π∑k=0∞Γ(3k+12)k!12kλ−3k−12. In order to arrive at an integral representation of a solution with the same asymptotic expansion within a certain sector near $$\lambda=\infty$$ one can integrate over a ray of the form $$x=r\,{\rm e}^{\frac{(2k+1)\pi\,i}3}$$, $$0<r<\infty$$ for $$k=0, \, 1,$$ or $$2$$. □ For an arbitrary simple Lie algebra we will now describe the reduction procedure for the dual topological ODE similar to the one used in the previous subsection. Write G(x)=∑i=1nϕi(x)adI+2miγi+∑i=1n∑m=02mi−1K~im(x)adI+mγi (1.37) (cf. (1.25)). Theorem 1.13. (i) Let $$G$$ be any solution of (1.33). Then $$\widetilde K_{im}$$ have the following expressions: K~im=∑u=1n∑v=02mi−m(−x)vkimuv0ϕu+∑u=1n∑v=0mi−1−m(−1)vkimuv1(xvϕu′+vxv−1ϕu), m=0,…,mi−1,K~im=x2mi−mϕi, m=mi,…,2mi, (1.38) where $$k_{imuv}^0,\,k_{imuv}^1$$ are the same constants as in Theorem 1.6. Moreover, the dual topological ODE (1.33) is equivalent to a system of first-order ODEs x2mi+1ϕi+∑u=1n∑v=02mi(−1)vkiuv0xvϕu+∑u=1n∑v=1mi(−1)vkiuv1(vxv−1ϕu+xvϕu′)=0. (1.39) Here, $$i=1, \dots, n,$$ and $$k^0_{iuv},\,k^1_{iuv}$$ are constants (the same as in Theorem 1.6). (ii) The point $$x=0$$ is a Fuchsian singularity of the ODE system (1.39). More precisely, equations (1.39) have the following normal form ϕ′=V−1xϕ+∑k=02h−2xkVkϕ,ϕ=(ϕ1,…,ϕn)T, (1.40) V−1=diag(−mn+1−a/h)a=1,…,n,Vk∈Mat(n,C),k≥0. (1.41) (iii) $$\dim_\mathbb{C} \mathcal{G}(\mathfrak{g})={\rm rk}\,\mathfrak{g}.$$ □ Remark 1.14. Choosing the contour $$C$$ in several ways in (1.34) one obtains a complete basis of solutions of (1.4). □ Example 1.15. For $$\mathfrak{g}=sl_2(\mathbb{C})$$ one reads from (1.35) that $$V_{-1}=-\frac12,\,V_0=V_1=0,\,V_2\,{=}\,\frac14.$$ □ Example 1.16. For $$\mathfrak{g}=sl_3(\mathbb{C})$$ the normal form (1.40) of the dual topological equation reads ϕ′=[−13x(2001)−x29(0020)+x46(0100)]ϕ. (1.42) □ Let $$G_a$$ denote the Laplace–Borel transform of $$M_a$$, and $$\phi_{a;1}, \dots, \phi_{a;n}$$ the $$\phi$$-coefficients of $$G_a$$, $$a=1, \dots, n$$. Then the matrix $$\Phi$$ defined by $$\Phi_{ia}:=\phi_{a;i}$$ is a fundamental solution matrix of the normal form (1.40). Definition 1.17. We call $$\phi_{a;i}$$ the dual essential series, and $$\phi_{a;a}$$ the dual fundamental series. □ For low ranks, the dual fundamental series $$\phi_{a;a}$$ can be expressed via elementary functions or combinations of elementary and Bessel functions, see Table 1. However, already for the case of the Lie algebra $$sl_5(\mathbb C)$$ we were not able to identify the dual fundamental series with a classical special function. Table 1. Special functions arising from the dual topological ODE of $$\mathfrak{g}$$-type Type of $$\mathfrak{g}$$ Special functions arising in dual fundamental series $$A_1$$ Exponential function Rank $$2$$ Bessel functions Rank $$3$$ Bessel functions, exponential functions $$A_4$$ Solutions to scalar ODEs of order $$4$$ $$D_4$$ Bessel functions, exponential functions Type of $$\mathfrak{g}$$ Special functions arising in dual fundamental series $$A_1$$ Exponential function Rank $$2$$ Bessel functions Rank $$3$$ Bessel functions, exponential functions $$A_4$$ Solutions to scalar ODEs of order $$4$$ $$D_4$$ Bessel functions, exponential functions Last but not least: why do we call eq. (1.4) the topological differential equation? For the case of $$\mathfrak{g}=sl_2(\mathbb C)$$ the Airy resolvent (1.6) appears in the expression of [4] for generating series of intersection numbers of $$\psi$$-classes on the Deligne–Mumford moduli spaces $$\overline{\mathcal M}_{g,N}$$; see also the formula (5.14). It turns out that for a simply laced simple Lie algebra $$\mathfrak{g}$$ a representation similar to that of [4] can be used for computing the E. Witten and H. Fan–T. Jarvis–Y. Ruan (FJRW) intersection numbers. We give the precise expressions in the last section of the present paper, see Theorems 5.1 and 5.5. Connection between FJRW invariants and tau-functions of the Drinfeld–Sokolov hierarchy of $$A\,D\,E$$-type conjectured in [37] and proven in [17, 18] plays an important role in derivation of these expressions. The non-simply laced analogue of the FJRW intersection numbers, according to the recent paper by Liu $$\textit{et al.}$$ [30], is related to tau-functions of the Drinfeld–Sokolov hierarchies of $$B\, C\, F\, G$$-type. 1.3 Organization of the paper In Section 2 we prove Theorem 1.2. In Section 3 we prove Theorem 1.6, Proposition 1.10, and Theorem 1.13. In Section 4, we calculate the dual essential series, in particular the dual fundamental series for several special cases. Concluding remarks are given in Section 5. We give definition and examples of generalized Airy functions in the Appendix. 2 Proof of Theorem 1.2 Before proceeding with the proof, we introduce the gradation operator gr=hλddλ+adρ∨. (2.1) Recall that $$\rho^\vee\in \mathfrak{h}$$ is the Weyl co-vector. The following statement [25] will be useful in the proof. Lemma 2.1. An element $$a\in L(\mathfrak{g})$$ is homogeneous of principal degree $$k$$if and only if gra=ka. (2.2) □ The action of the gradation operator can be obviously extended to expressions containing fractional powers of $$\lambda$$. The following lemma will also be useful. Lemma 2.2. The following formulæ hold true: L(g)=KeradΛ⊕ImadΛ,ImadΛ=(KeradΛ)⊥, (2.3) where the orthogonality is with respect to the Cartan–Killing form. □ The proof can be found, for example, in [11]. Proof of Theorem 1.2. Let us fix an exponent $$m_a$$ for some $$a\in \{1,\dots,n\}.$$ We first prove existence and uniqueness of formal solutions of (1.4) of the following form: M(λ)=λ−mah∑k=0∞Mk(λ),M0(λ)=Λma, (2.4) Mk(λ)∈L(g),degMk(λ)=ma−(h+1)k. (2.5) Substituting (2.4) in (1.4) and equating the terms of equal principal degrees we obtain [Λ,M0]=0, (2.6) [Λ,Mk+1]=−Mk′+mah1λMk,k≥0. (2.7) The first condition follows due to the choice $$M_0=\Lambda_{m_a}$$ (see eq. (1.14)). In order to resolve eq. (2.7) for $$k=0$$ one has to check that hλΛma′−maΛma∈ImadΛ. Indeed, since $$\deg \Lambda_{m_a}=a$$ we have grΛma≡hλΛma′+[ρ∨,Λma]=maΛma. So, the equation (2.7) for $$k=0$$ becomes [Λ,M1]=1hλ[ρ∨,Λma]. Due to Lemma 2.2 it suffices to check that the r.h.s. is orthogonal to $${\rm Ker}\, \mathrm {ad}_\Lambda$$. Indeed, ([ρ∨,Λma]|Λj)=(ρ∨|[Λma,Λj])=0. This completes the first step of the recursive procedure. Assume, by induction, that the $$k$$th term $$M_k(\lambda)$$ exists and, moreover, it satisfies −Mk′+mah1λMk∈ImadΛ. Then there exists a matrix $$M_{k+1}$$ satisfying eq. (2.7). It is determined uniquely modulo an element in $${\rm Ker}\, \mathrm {ad}_\Lambda$$. Write Mk+1=A+B,A∈ImadΛ,B∈KeradΛ, (2.8) degA=degB=ma−(h+1)(k+1). (2.9) Since the map adΛ:ImadΛ→ImadΛ is an isomorphism it remains to prove that the matrix $$B=B(\lambda)$$ is uniquely determined by the condition −Mk+1′+mah1λMk+1∈ImadΛ. Like above, using the degree condition (2.9) along with the gradation operator (2.1) recast the last condition into the form [ρ∨,A+B]+(h+1)(k+1)(A+B)⊥KeradΛ. (2.10) By assumption $$A\perp {\rm Ker}\, \mathrm {ad}_\Lambda$$. Also $$\left[ \rho^\vee, B\right]\perp {\rm Ker}\, \mathrm {ad}_\Lambda$$ due to commutativity of $${\rm Ker}\, \mathrm {ad}_\Lambda$$. Thus eq. (2.10) reduces to the system (h+1)(k+1)(B|Λj)=−([ρ∨,A]|Λj),j∈E. (2.11) Decompose now $$B$$ as follows: B=∑b=1ncb(λ)Λmb(λ). Choosing $$j=m_1, \dots, m_n$$ and using the normalization (1.16) one finally obtains B=−1λh(h+1)(k+1)∑b=1n([ρ∨,A]|Λmn+1−b)Λmb. This concludes the inductive step and thus completes the proof of existence and uniqueness of solutions (1.17) to the topological ODE (1.4). The series $$M_1(\lambda),\dots,M_n(\lambda)$$ are linearly independent since their leading terms are. It is known from [34] that there exist analytic solutions to the topological ODE whose asymptotic expansions in certain sector coincide with $$M_i$$. These solutions we denote again by $$M_i$$. We conclude that SpanC{M1,…,Mn}⊂S∞reg(g). (2.12) In particular $$\dim_\mathbb{C}\mathfrak{S}_\infty^{\rm reg}(\mathfrak{g})\geq n.$$ On another hand, according to Kostant [27] for any $$\lambda_0\in\mathbb{C}$$ the kernel of $${\rm ad}_{\Lambda(\lambda_0)}: \mathfrak{g} \to \mathfrak{g}$$ is of dimension $$n$$. This implies that dimCS∞reg≤n. (2.13) Hence $$\dim_\mathbb{C}\mathfrak{S}_\infty^{\rm reg}(\mathfrak{g})=n$$ and $$\mathfrak{S}_\infty^{\rm reg}(\mathfrak{g})={\rm Span}_\mathbb{C} \{M_1,\dots,M_n\}.$$ Theorem 1.2 is proved. □ The above proof gives an algorithm for computing $$M_a,\,a=1,\dots,n$$ recursively. Remark 2.3. Theorem 1.2 and Proposition 1.4 tell that $$\mathfrak{S}_\infty^{\rm reg}(\mathfrak{g})$$ forms a one-parameter family of Abelian subalgebras of $$\mathfrak{g}.$$ □ Example 2.4. (The $$A_n$$ case). Take the same matrix realization of $$\mathfrak{g}$$ as in Example 1.5, so that the normalized Cartan–Killing form coincides with the matrix trace. Recall that $$h=n+1,\,m_a=a$$. We have Λj=Λj,ρ∨=diag(n2,n−22,…,−n2), (2.14) Hj=Ej,j−Ej+1,j+1,h=SpanC{Hj}j=1n. (2.15) Fix an exponent $$m_a$$. Consider $$[L,M]=0,\,L=\partial_{\lambda}+\Lambda$$ and write $$M=\lambda^{-\frac{a}h}\sum_{k=0}^\infty M_k,$$ then Mk=Ak+Bk,Ak∈ImadΛ,Bk∈KeradΛ, k≥0. (2.16) Here $$A_k$$ and $$B_k$$ have the principal degree $$\deg A_k=\deg B_k=a-(h+1)k,$$ and Bk=−1λkh(h+1)∑b=1n(adρ∨Ak|Λn+1−b)Λb,k≥1. (2.17) It can be easily seen that ImadΛ=SpanC[λ,λ−1]{HiΛj|i=1,…,n, j=0,…,n}, (2.18) Tr(XΛj[ρ∨,Λℓ])={−hλxjδn+1,j+ℓj=1,…,n,0j=0,. for X=∑i=1nxiHi. (2.19) Thus if $$A_k\,(k\geq 1)$$ is of form $$A_k = \sum_{j=0}^n X^{(j)}_k(\lambda) \, \Lambda^j(\lambda),~ X^{(j)}_k= \sum_{i=1}^n x_{k,i}^{(j)} \, H_i ~(0\leq j \leq n),$$ then Bk(λ)=1(h+1)k∑j=1nxk,j(j)(λ)Λj(λ),k≥1. (2.20) Denote by $$\zeta=\exp({2\pi \sqrt{-1}}/{h})$$ a root of unity. The map $$\mathrm {ad}_\Lambda$$ acts on $${\rm Im}\,\mathrm {ad}_\Lambda$$ as follows: adΛ(XΛj)=X~Λj+1,j=0,…,n, X,X~∈h, (2.21) (x~1x~2⋮x~n)=−(2−10…011−1…0101−1…0⋮⋱⋱10…1−110…01)(x1x2⋮xn). (2.22) Define $$\Omega_\nu = {\rm diag} (\zeta^{\nu(j-1)} )_{j=1\dots n+1}, ~ \nu = 1,\dots n,$$ then we have adΛ(ΩνΛj)=(ζν−1)ΩνΛj+1,j=0,…,n. (2.23) A direct computation gives ρ∨=∑ν=1nζνζν−1Ων,adρ∨Λ0=0,adρ∨Λℓ=(∑ν=1nζν−ζν(ℓ+1)ζν−1Ων)Λℓ, ℓ≥1; (2.24) adΛ−1adρ∨Λℓ=(∑ν=1nζν−ζν(ℓ+1)(ζν−1)2Ων)Λℓ−1, ℓ≥1. (2.25) Using these formulæ and consider the leading term of $$M$$ given by $$M_0 = \Lambda_a,$$ one immediately obtains the formula of the first-order approximation (1.20). □ 3 Essential Series and Dual Essential Series In this section we apply a reduction approach and the technique of Laplace–Borel transform to prove Theorem 1.6, Proposition 1.10, and Theorem 1.13. First of all, we introduce the lowest weight structure constants. Definition 3.1. Fix a choice of $$\gamma^1,\dots,\gamma^n$$ and $$I_+$$ as above. The coefficients $$c^{(p,q),(m,i)}_{(j,s)}$$ uniquely determined by [adI+pγq,adI+mγi]=∑j=1n∑s=02mjc(j,s)(p,q),(m,i)adI+sγj. (3.1) are called the lowest weight structure constants of $$\mathfrak{g}$$. □ In this paper we will only use part of these structure constants, namely $$c^m_{ijs}:=c^{(0,n),(m,i)}_{(j,s)}$$. The above definition (3.1) becomes [γn,adI+mγi]=∑j=1n∑s=02mjcijsmadI+sγj. (3.2) Lemma 3.2. The constants $$c^m_{i j s}$$ are zero unless s−mj=m−mi−(h−1). (3.3) □ Proof By using the fact that degadI+sγj=s−mj,∀s∈{0,…,2mj} and by comparing the principal degrees of both sides of (3.2). ■ Lemma 3.3. If $$i,j\in\{1,\dots,n\}$$ satisfy $$m_i+m_j=h-1$$ then $$c_{ij0}^{2m_i}=0.$$ □ Proof It suffices to consider the case $$i\leq n-1$$. By Lemma 3.2 we have [γn,adI+2miγi]=∑0≤mi+mj−(h−1)≤2mjcij,mi+mj−(h−1)2miadI+mi+mj−(h−1)γj. (3.4) We will use the following orthogonality conditions [27] (γi1|adI+2mi2γi2)=0,if i1≠i2. (3.5) It follows that (ρ∨|[γn,adI+2miγi])=([ρ∨,γn]|adI+2miγi)=−(h−1)(γn|adI+2miγi)=0. (3.6) On another hand, for $$m_i+m_j-(h-1)\geq 2$$ we have (ρ∨|adI+mi+mj−(h−1)γj)=(I+|adI+mi+mj−(h−1)−1γj)=0. (3.7) For $$m_i+m_j-(h-1)=1$$ we have (ρ∨|adI+γj)=(I+|γj)=0. (3.8) The last equality is due to $$i\neq n$$ and so $$j$$ cannot be $$1$$, and $$I_+=const \cdot \mathrm {ad}_{I_+}^2\,\gamma^1$$. Hence $$c_{ij0}^{2m_i}=0.$$ The lemma is proved. ■ Proof of Theorem 1.6. Let $$M$$ be any solution of (1.4). It can be uniquely decomposed in the form M=∑i=1n∑m=02miKimadI+mγi (3.9) for some functions $$K_{im}=K_{im}(\lambda)$$. Substituting this expression into eq. (1.4) we have ∑i=1n∑m=02miKim′adI+mγi+∑i=1n∑m=12miKi,m−1adI+mγi+λ[γn,∑i=1n∑m=02miKimadI+mγi]=0. (3.10) Here $$'$$ means the derivative w.r.t. $$\lambda.$$ Substituting (3.2) into (3.10) we find ∑j=1n∑s=02mj(Kjs′+Kj,s−1)adI+sγj+λ∑j=1n∑s=02mj∑i=1n∑m=02miKimcijsadI+sγj=0, (3.11) where $$K_{j,-1}:=0.$$ Now using Lemma 3.2 we find Kj,s−1=−Kjs′−λ∑mi≥s−mj+(h−1)cijss+mi−mj+(h−1)Ki,s+mi−mj+(h−1), (3.12) where $$0\leq s\leq 2m_j.$$ Due to the inequality $$m_i-m_j+h-1\geq m_i > 0$$ the system (3.12) is of triangular form. So we can solve it for the vector $$(K_{j,s-1})_{j=1}^{n}$$ as long as the vectors $$(K_{j s'})_{j=1}^n,\ s'\geq s+1$$, are known. By definition $$S_{j}=K_{j,\,2m_{j}}$$. Thus $$K_{im},\,m=0,\dots, 2m_{i}-1$$ are determined as linear combinations of $$S_{1},\dots,S_{n}$$ and their derivatives. Further noticing that s+mi−mj+(h−1)≥s+mi,∀i,j (3.13) we obtain the more subtle expressions (1.26). Indeed, it is easy to see that Kim=(−1)mSi(2mi−m),mi≤m≤2mi−1. (3.14) This observation together with (3.13), (3.12) yields (1.26). The coefficients $$k^0_{imuv}$$ and $$k^1_{imuv}$$ in (1.26) are uniquely specified by the lowest weight structure constants of $$\mathfrak{g}.$$ Taking $$s=0$$ in eqs. (3.12) we obtain a system of linear ODEs (1.27) of the form Si(2mi+1)=∑u=1n∑v=02mikiuv0Su(v)+λ∑u=1n∑v=0mikiuv1Su(v),i=1,…,n, (3.15) where the constant coefficients $$k^0_{iuv}$$ and $$k^1_{iuv}$$ are determined by the lowest weight structure constants of $$\mathfrak{g}$$. It is now clear that there is a one-to-one correspondence between solutions of the topological ODE (1.4) and solutions of the system (3.15). Thus these two systems of ODEs are equivalent. It remains to show that $$k^1_{iu0}=0,\,\forall \,i,u\,\in\{1,\dots,n\}.$$ The $$(s=0)$$-equations in (3.12) read as follows: Kj0′+λ∑mi+mj≥h−1cij0mi−mj+(h−1)Ki,mi−mj+(h−1)=0. (3.16) Taking the $$\lambda$$-derivative in the $$(m=0,\,i=j)$$-equations of (1.26) we obtain Kj0′=Sj(2mj+1)+∑u=1n∑v=02mj−1kj0uv0Su(v+1)+∑u=1n∑v=0mj−1kj0uv1Su(v)+λ∑u=1n∑v=0mj−1kj0uv1Su(v+1). (3.17) From equations (3.17), (3.16), (3.15) we know that $$K_{j0}'$$ does not contribute to $$k^1_{iu0}$$. The only possible terms that can contribute to $$k^1_{iu0}$$ are ∑mi+mj≥h−1cij0mi−mj+(h−1)Ki,mi−mj+(h−1). (3.18) Noticing again the inequalities $$m_i-m_j+(h-1)\geq m_i$$ as well as (3.14), we find that (3.18) does not contribute to $$k^1_{iu0}$$ unless mi−mj+(h−1)=2mi. (3.19) However, by Lemma 3.3 we know that $$c_{ij0}^{2m_i}=0$$ if $$m_i+m_j=h-1.$$ Hence $$k^1_{iu0}\equiv0.$$ The theorem is proved. □ Equations (1.27) can be written in the following form (which will be used later): ∑v=02h−1pv0S(v)+λ∑v=1hpv1S(v)=0,S=(S1,…,Sn)T, (3.20) where $$p^0_{v}$$ and $$p^1_{ v}$$ are constant $$n\times n$$ matrices, $$(p^0_v)_{iu}=k^0_{iuv},\,(p^1_v)_{iu}=k^1_{iuv}.$$ These matrices satisfy $$(p^0_{2m_i+1})_{\,i, \,2m_i+1}=-1$$ and the following vanishing conditions: (pv0)iu=0ifv>2mi+1, (pv1)iu=0ifv>mi. (3.21) Before proving Proposition 1.10 and Theorem 1.13 we do some preparations. Recall that the essential series $$S_{a;i}$$ of $$\mathfrak{g}$$ are defined as the $$S$$-coefficients of the generalized Airy resolvents $$M_a.$$ Lemma 3.4. For any $$a\in \{1,\dots,n\}$$, the essential series $$S_{a;i},\,i=1,\dots,n$$ have the form Sa;i=λ−saih∑m=0∞ci,maλ−m(h+1),ci,ma∈C, (3.22) where $$s_{ai}$$ is a positive integer satisfying sai≡ma modh,sai≡mi mod(h+1). (3.23) In particular, the essential series $$S_{a;a}$$ is non-zero and has the form Sa;a=λ−mah∑m=0∞cmaλ−m(h+1),c0a≠0, cma∈C. (3.24) □ Proof Fix an integer $$a\in\{1,\dots,n\}.$$ By (1.17) we know that $$S_{a;i}\in \, \lambda^{-\frac{m_a}h} \cdot \mathbb{C}((\lambda^{-1})), \quad i=1,\dots,n,$$ where $$\mathbb{C}((\lambda^{-1}))$$ denotes the set of formal Laurent series at $$\lambda=\infty.$$ If $$S_{a;i}$$ is zero then it has the form (3.22) with $$c_{i,m}^a=0,\,m\geq 0.$$ Let $$S_{a;i}$$ be non-zero. Recall the expansion (1.17) Ma(λ)=λ−mah[Λma+∑k=1∞Ma,k(λ)],Ma,k(λ)∈L(g),degMa,k(λ)=ma−(h+1)k,a=1,…,n. Let $$S_{a;i,k}(\lambda)$$ denote the $$S$$-coefficients of $$M_{a,k}(\lambda)$$, we have Sa;i=λ−mah∑k=0∞Sa;i,k(λ). (3.25) Noticing that $$\deg \, \mathrm {ad}_{I_+}^{2m_i}\gamma^i=m_i$$ we obtain degSa;i,k(λ)=ma−mi−(h+1)k,k≥0. (3.26) Since $$\deg\,\lambda=h$$ we conclude that ma−mi−(h+1)k≡0 (modh). (3.27) Hence $$S_{a;i,k}=0$$ unless there exists an integer $$u$$ such that $$k=m_a-m_i+u \, h,$$ and in this case Sa;i,k=const⋅λ−(ma−mi)−u(h+1), (3.28) which yields (3.23). Here, note that $$k\geq 0$$ implies $$u\geq 0$$, hence $$s_{ai}>0.$$ To prove (3.24) it suffices to show that $$c^a_{0}\neq 0$$. It has been proved by Kostant that the elements $$\Lambda_{m_a},\,a=1,\dots, n$$ have the following decompositions (cf. p. 1014 in [27]) Λma=λβ+vadI+2maγa,degβ=−(h−ma), (3.29) where $$v$$ are some non-zero constant and $$\beta\in\mathfrak{g}$$. (We would like to thank Yassir Dinar for bringing this useful result of [27] to our attention.) Here, we have also applied the facts KeradI+=Span{adI+2m1γ1,…,adI+2mnγn},degadI+2miγi=mi. (3.30) The lemma is proved. ■ Let us now prove Proposition 1.10. Proof The statement (i) follows from (3.22). The statement (ii) follows from (1.26) because $$M_a$$ are linearly independent. The statement (iii) is contained in Lemma 3.4. Let $$M$$ be a regular solution to (1.4) such that the $$S_a$$-coefficient of $$M$$ coincides with $$S_{a;a}$$. If the exponents of $$\mathfrak{g}$$ are pairwise distinct then $$M$$ must be equal to $$M_a$$ since $$S_{a;a}$$ is non-zero. Slight modifications can be done for $$D_n$$ with $$n$$ even as described in the content of the proposition. The proposition is proved. ■ For any $$a\in\{1,\dots,n\}$$, Theorem 1.6 reduces $$M_a$$ consisting of $$n(h+1)$$ scalar series to $$n$$ scalar series $$S_{a;j},\,j=1,\dots,n.$$ Proposition 1.10 further reduces $$\{S_{a;j}\}_{j=1}^n$$ to one scalar series $$S_{a;a}$$. Finally let us consider the Laplace–Borel transform and prove Theorem 1.13. Proof Equations (1.38), (1.39) follow directly from equations (1.26), (1.27). So (i) is proved. To show (ii), we will construct a basis of formal solutions to (1.39). Indeed, we consider the Laplace–Borel transform of the essential series $$S_{a;i}(\lambda)$$ Sa;i(λ)=∫Caϕa;i(x)e−λxdx (3.31) for suitable contours $$C_a.$$ By Lemma 3.4 we have ϕa;i=xsaih−1∑m=0∞ci,maΓ(saih+m(h+1))xm(h+1), (3.32) where the coefficients $$c^a_{i,m}$$ are defined by eq. (3.22). For $$i\neq a$$, equations (3.23) imply that the integers $$s_{ai}$$ satisfy sai≥ma+h and sai≥mi+h+1 (3.33) if all exponents are pairwise distinct; for the case $$\mathfrak{g}$$ is of the $$D_{n=2k}$$ type, the above estimates are also true after possibly a linear change ϕn/2↦a1ϕn/2+a2ϕn/2+1, (3.34) ϕn/2+1↦b1ϕn/2+b2ϕn/2+1 (3.35) of two solutions $$\phi_{n/2},\,\phi_{n/2+1}$$. In any case, for $$i=a$$ we have ϕa;a=xmah−1∑m=0∞cmaΓ(mah+m(h+1))xm(h+1),c0a≠0. (3.36) Hence we have obtained a set of independent formal solutions of (1.39) ϕ1;j,…,ϕn;j, and we collect them to a matrix solution $$\Phi$$ by defining $$\Phi_{ia}=\phi_{a;i}$$, then we have Φ=(I+O(x))(xm1h−10⋯00xm2h−1⋱⋮⋮⋱⋱000⋯xmnh−1),x→0. (3.37) Equations (1.39) can be written as ∑v=02h−1(−x)vpv0ϕ+∑v=1h(−1)vpv1(xvϕ′+vxv−1ϕ)=0,ϕ=(ϕ1,…,ϕn)T, (3.38) where $$p^0_v$$ and $$p^1_v$$ are $$n\times n$$ matrices defined in (3.20). So we have B(x)Φ′(x)=C(x)Φ(x), (3.39) where $$B,\,C$$ are $$n\times n$$ matrices whose entries are polynomials in $$x$$ with coefficients determined uniquely by the lowest weight structure constants. More explicitly, the expressions of $$B,C$$ are given by B(x)=∑v=1h(−1)vxvpv1,C(x)=∑v=02h−1(−x)vpv0+∑v=1h(−1)vvxv−1pv1. We are going to show that the matrix $$B(x)$$ is of the following form: B=(0⋯0b1⋅x⋮⋱b2⋅x∗0⋱⋱$⋮bn⋅x∗⋯∗), (3.40) where the asterisks denote polynomials in $$x$$ possessing at least a double zero at $$x=0.$$ Recall that $$p^1_v$$ are defined as the matrix of coefficients of $$\lambda\times S_j^{(v)},\,j=1,\dots,n$$ in the following equations: Kj0′+λ∑mi+mj≥h−1cij0mi−mj+(h−1)(−1)mi+mj+h−1Si(mi+mj−(h−1))=0,′=ddλ. (3.41) The summand with $$m_i+m_j=h-1$$ in (3.41) does not contribute to the matrix $$B(x)$$, since we have already proved in Theorem 1.6 that $$p^1_0=0.$$ Let us consider the summands in (3.41) with $$m_i+m_j\geq h$$. Consider first the case $$\mathfrak{g}\neq D_{n}$$ with $$n$$ even where all exponents are distinct. In this case the $$(m_i+m_j=h)$$-summand of the second term of l.h.s. of (3.41) contributes to the anti-diagonal entries of $$B(x)$$. For $$m_i+m_j=h+1,h+2,\dots, 2h-2$$ the corresponding summands contribute to the entries of $$B(x)$$ marked with an asterisk. The first term $$K_{j0}'$$ also contributes to $$B(x)$$ through the last term of r.h.s. of (3.17), namely, λ∑u=1n∑v=0mj−1kj0uv1Su(v+1). To understand this term we look at the $$(s=1)$$-equations of (3.12): Kj0=−Kj1′−λ∑mi+mj≥hcij1mi−mj+h(−1)mi+mj−hSi(mi+mj−h). (3.42) The contribution is of the form (3.40). We proceed in a similar way with analyzing $$K_{j1},K_{j2},\dots,$$ in order to arrive at the matrix $$B(x)$$ in a finite number of steps. In the case of $$D_n$$ with $$n$$ even, the above arguments remain valid with suitable choices of $$\gamma^{n/2},\,\gamma^{n/2+1}.$$ We have $$\det \, B=\pm \,b_1\cdots b_n \,x^n.$$ Since the dimension of the space of solutions of (1.4) is finite and since we have already obtained $$n$$ linearly independent solutions of (3.39), we conclude that each $$b_i$$ is not zero. Using (3.21) and noting that the $$(m_i+m_j=k,\,k\geq h+1)$$-off diagonal entries of $$B(x)$$ (which are the terms marked with asterisk) have at least a $$(k-(h-1))$$-tuple zero, we conclude that the equations ϕ′=B−1Cϕ,ϕ=(ϕ1,…,ϕn)T (3.43) have the precise normal form (1.40), where the expression $$V_{-1}$$ is due to (3.37). The part (ii) of Theorem 1.13 is proved. Finally, (iii) follows from the normal form (1.40) automatically. The theorem is proved. ■ The series $$\phi_{a;i}$$ in the above proof are called the dual essential series of $$\mathfrak{g}$$. The final remark is about uniqueness of essential series. We fix a principal nilpotent element $$I_+$$. Then, for a given choice of the basis $$\{\gamma^i\}_{i=1}^n$$ and of $$\{\Lambda_{m_j}\}_{j=1}^n$$, the series $$\{S_{i;j}\}_{i,j=1}^n$$ are determined uniquely. With a particular choice of only $$\{\Lambda_{m_j}\}_{j=1}^n$$, the element $$\gamma^j$$ for any $$j\in\{1,\dots,n\}$$ and hence each of the series $$\{S_{i;j}\}_{i=1}^n$$ is unique up to a constant factor except for the $$D_n$$ with even $$n$$ case. Because of this for presenting the expression of an essential or a dual essential series, we allow a free constant factor. For the exceptional case $$D_n$$ with $$n$$ even, $$\gamma^{n/2},\,\gamma^{n/2+1}$$ and hence $$\{S_{i;n/2},\,S_{i;n/2+1}\}_{i=1}^n$$ are unique up to invertible linear combinations with constant coefficients. 4 Examples In this section we study examples of low ranks. We take a faithful matrix realization $$\pi$$ of $$\mathfrak{g},$$ and derive the normal form (1.40) and dual essential series. Denote by $$\chi$$ the unique constant such that (a|b)=χTr(π(a)π(b)),∀a,b∈g. (4.1) Below, we will often write $$\pi(a),\,a\in\mathfrak{g}$$ just as $$a,$$ for simplicity. 4.1 Simply laced cases Example 4.1 (The cases $$A_1,A_2$$). These two cases have already been studied in detail in Introduction (see (1.5–1.8), Examples 1.9, 1.15, 1.16). Here we will make a short summary. The essential series for $$A_1$$ has the following explicit expression: S=∑g=0∞(6g−1)!!96g⋅g!1λ6g+12, which was derived in [4] by an alternative method. The dual fundamental series has the expression ϕ=x−12ex312. The essential series for $$A_2$$ are given below in equations (5.15–5.18). The dual fundamental series are given explicitly via confluent hypergeometric limit functions ϕ1;1=x−23⋅0F1(;13;−x81728),ϕ2;2=x−13⋅0F1(;23;−x81728). They satisfy the following ODEs, respectively: 27x2ϕ1;1″−81xϕ1;1′+(x8−84)ϕ1;1=0,27x2ϕ2;2″−27xϕ2;2′+(x8−21)ϕ2;2=0. □ Recall that the confluent hypergeometric limit function is defined by the convergent series 0F1(;a;z)=∑k=0∞1(a)kzkk!, where (a)k=a(a+1)…(a+k−1) (4.2) is the Pochhammer symbol. It is also closely related to the Bessel functions Jν(x)=(z2)νΓ(ν+1)0F1(;ν+1;−z24). Example 4.2 (The $$A_3$$ case). In this case, $$\mathfrak{g}=sl_4(\mathbb{C}),\,h=4.$$ The normal form of the dual topological ODE reads as follows: ϕ′=(−34000−12000−14)ϕx+(−316x40−158x+18x60−14x4018x200)ϕ. The dual fundamental series satisfy the following ODEs: 64(x5−15)x2ϕ1;1″−4(125−3x5)x6ϕ1;1′−(x15−9x10+1134x5−1260)ϕ1;1=0,4xϕ2;2′+(x5+2)ϕ2;2=0,64x2ϕ3;3″−(64x−12x6)ϕ3;3′−(x10−18x5+36)ϕ3;3=0, and they are given explicitly by ϕ1;1=x−34e−3x5160[ 0F1(;14;x104096)−3x5800F1(;54;x104096)]ϕ2;2=x−12e−x520,ϕ3;3=x−14e−3x5160⋅0F1(;34;x104096). □ Example 4.3 (The $$A_4$$ case). In this case $$h=5$$ and $$\mathfrak{g}=sl_5(\mathbb{C}).$$ The normal form of the dual topological ODE of $$A_4$$-type reads as follows: ϕ′=(−450000−350000−250000−15)ϕx+(0−6625x6−7925x110x811210x40−125x6−1112x07300x400−235x2000)ϕ. (4.3) Let $$\theta=x\,\partial_x;$$ then $$\phi_{4;4}$$ satisfies the following ODE: [3125(x12+155)θ4−12500(7x12+620)θ3+625(x24+1277x12+54870)θ2.−1250(x24+321x12+31124)θ+(x36−1495x24+510995x12−9215525)]ϕ4;4=0. (4.4) Noting that $$x=0$$ is a regular singularity of this ODE and that the indicial equation at $$x=0$$ reads (k+15)(k−115)(k−235)(k−475)=0, (4.5) one then recognizes that the dual fundamental series $$\phi_{4;4}$$ is the (unique up to a constant factor) solution corresponding to the root $$k=-\frac15$$, ϕ4;4=x−1/5(1−161210⋅35x12+26605753223⋅312⋅52x24−…). In a similar way one can treat the other three dual fundamental series. For any solution $$\phi=(\phi_1,\dots,\phi_4)^T$$ of the normal form (4.3), $$\phi_4$$ satisfies (4.4), and the series $$\phi_{a;4},\,a=1,\dots,4$$ are all non-zero. Hence, similarly to the proof of Proposition 1.10, for $$A_4$$, one can use one ODE to determine all solutions of (4.3). In particular, the interesting numbers $$s_{a;4},\,a=1,\dots,4$$ (see eq. (3.22)) can be read off immediately from (4.5): s1;4=16, s2;4=52, s3;4=28, s4;4=4. (4.6) We expect that this phenomenon always occurs when $$h$$ is an odd number; this is motivated by the fact (deduced from the so-called dimension counting for certain FJRW invariants; see in Section 5 for some remarks on these invariants) that if $$h$$ is odd then $$\phi_{a;n},\, a=1,\dots,n$$ are all non-zero. □ Example 4.4 (The case $$D_4$$). We have $$n=4$$, $$h=6$$ and $$m_1=1,\,m_2=3,\,m_3=3',\,m_4=5$$ and g={B∈Mat(8,C)|B+SηBTηS=0}, (4.7) where $$\eta_{ij}=\delta_{i+j,9},\,1\leq i,j\leq 8$$ and $$S={\rm diag}\,(1,-1,1,-1,-1,1,-1,1).$$ In this case, $$\chi=\frac12$$ and Λ=(01000000001000000001120000000012000000010000000010λ200000010λ2000000). (4.8) The matrices $$\Lambda_1,\,\Lambda_3,\,\Lambda_{3'},\,\Lambda_5$$ can be chosen as follows: Λ1=Λ,Λ5=2Λ5,Λ3=Λ3,Λ3′=2(00001000000001000000001000000001λ00000000λ00000000λ00000000λ0000). (4.9) The normal form of the dual topological ODEs of the $$D_4$$-type reads as follows: ϕ′=(−560000−120000−120000−16)ϕx+(2627x600919x3+16x100x60000x6029x2000)ϕ. (4.10) The dual fundamental series are given by ϕ1;1=x−56exp(13x7189)⋅[0F1(;16;x1436)+1363x70F1(;76;x1436)],ϕ2;2=ϕ3;3=x−12exp(x77),ϕ4;4=x−16exp(13x7189)⋅0F1(;56;x1436). They are solutions to the following ODEs, respectively: 108(3x7+182)x2ϕ1;1″−4(78x14+5461x7+9828)xϕ1;1′ −(12x21+260x14+107029x7+62790)ϕ1;1=0,ϕ2;2′=−ϕ2;22x+x6ϕ2;2,ϕ3;3′=−ϕ3;32x+x6ϕ3;3,108x2ϕ4;4″−(104x8+108x)ϕ4;4′−(4x14+260x7+39)ϕ4;4=0. □ 4.2 Non-simply laced cases Example 4.5 (The case $$B_2$$). We use the realization given in [11]: $$\mathfrak{g}= \{B\in {\rm Mat} (5,\mathbb{C})\,|\, B+ S\eta B \eta S =0\}, \chi=\frac12$$ where $$\eta_{ij}=\delta_{i+j,6}\,(1\leq i,j\leq 5),$$$$S={\rm diag}\,(1,-1,1,-1,1).$$ We have Λ=(010000010000010λ200010λ2000). Recall that in this case $$h=4,\,m_1=1,\,m_2=3$$, and we can choose $$\Lambda_{m_i}$$ as follows: Λ1=Λ,Λ3=2Λ3. (4.11) The normal form of the dual topological ODE is given by ϕ′=(−3400−14)ϕx+(34x41516x+14x6x20)ϕ. (4.12) Solving this ODE system we obtain the dual fundamental series ϕ1;1=x−34e3x540[0F1(;14;x1028)+3x5200F1(;54;x1028)],ϕ2;2=x−14e3x5400F1(;34;x1028). They are solutions to the following ODEs (64x5+240)x2ϕ1;1″−(48x5+500)x6ϕ1;1′−(16x15+36x10+1134x5+315)ϕ1;1=0,16x2ϕ2;2″−4(3x5+4)xϕ2;2′−(4x10+18x5+9)ϕ2;2=0. □ Example 4.6 (The $$B_3$$ case). We have $$h=6,\,\mathfrak{g}= \{B\in {\rm Mat} (7,\mathbb{C})\,|\, B+ S\eta B \eta S =0\},\,\chi=\frac12$$ where $$\eta_{ij}=\delta_{i+j,8},\,1\leq i,j\leq 7$$ and $$S={\rm diag}\,(1,-1,1,-1,1,-1,1).$$ The cyclic element is Λ=(01000000010000000100000001000000010λ20000010λ200000). We choose $$\Lambda_{m_i}$$ as follows: $$\Lambda_1=\Lambda,\quad \Lambda_5=2\,\Lambda^5,\quad \Lambda_3=\sqrt{2}\,\Lambda^3.$$ The normal form of the dual topological ODEs read ϕ′=(−56000−12000−16)ϕx+(2627x60919x3+16x100x6029x200)ϕ, which is obviously equivalent to the normal form of $$D_4$$ restricted to $$\phi_3\equiv0.$$ Hence ϕ1;1=x−56exp(13x7189)⋅[0F1(;16;x1436)+1363x70F1(;76;x1436)],ϕ2;2=x−12exp(x77),ϕ3;3=x−16exp(13x7189)⋅0F1(;56;x1436). □ Example 4.7 (The $$G_2$$ case). We have $$h=6,\,m_1=1,\,m_2=5.$$ Using the matrix realization given in [2], we obtain the normal form of the dual topological ODE of $$G_2$$-type ϕ′=(−5600−16)ϕx+(1354x618209x3+56x101360x20)ϕ. (4.13) The dual fundamental series have the following explicit expressions: ϕ1;1=x−56e13x7756[ 0F1(;16;x1424⋅36)+13x72520F1(;76;x1424⋅36)],ϕ2;2=x−16e13x7756⋅0F1(;56;x1424⋅36). We remark that the normal form of $$G_2$$-type coincides with the normal form of $$B_3$$ restricted to $$\phi_2\equiv0$$ after a rescaling of $$\Lambda$$ by $$\Lambda\mapsto 2^{-\frac13}\,\Lambda.$$ □ 5 Concluding Remarks 5.1 On the analytic properties of solutions to the topological ODEs We have proved the dimension of the space of solutions regular at $$\lambda=\infty$$ of the topological equation of $$\mathfrak{g}$$-type [L,M]=0,L=∂λ+Λ (5.1) is equal to the rank of $$\mathfrak{g}.$$ We have also proved Theorem 1.6 on reduction of this equation through the lowest weight gauge. One can also consider the vector space of all solutions to the topological ODE; denote it by $$\mathfrak{S}(\mathfrak{g})$$. As $$\lambda=0$$ is a regular point for the system (1.4), every solution $$M(\lambda)\in \mathfrak{S}(\mathfrak{g})$$ is uniquely determined by the initial data $$M(0)$$. Thus $$\dim_\mathbb{C} \, \mathfrak{S}(\mathfrak{g})=\dim_\mathbb{C} \, \mathfrak{g}=n(h+1).$$ Denote $$M^{ak}$$ the unique analytic solution of (1.4) determined by the following initial data: Mak(0)=adI+kγa,a=1,…,n,k=0,…,2ma. (5.2) Clearly $$M^{ak}(\lambda)$$ form a basis of $$\mathfrak{S}(\mathfrak{g}).$$ With a particular choice of basis $$\{M_1,\dots,M_n\}$$ of $$\mathfrak{S}_\infty^{\rm reg}(\mathfrak{g})$$, there exist unique partial connection numbers$$C_{abk}$$ such that Ma=∑b=1n∑k=02mbCabkMbk, (5.3) where $$C_{abk}$$ are constants. (Such a choice depends on a choice of an appropriate sector in the complex plane near $$\lambda=\infty$$.) We will study these connection numbers for the topological ODEs as well as the monodromy data for the dual topological ODEs in a subsequent publication. 5.2 Application of topological ODEs to computation of intersection numbers on the moduli spaces of $$r$$-spin structures First, it should be noted that all main results of the previous sections remain valid after a change of normalization of the topological equation. It will be convenient to introduce a normalization factor $$\kappa$$ in the following way: [L,M]=0,L=∂λ+κΛ. (5.4) This parameter will be useful for applications of solutions to (5.4) to computation of certain topological invariants of Deligne–Mumford moduli spaces. In particular, here we explain two applications of the topological ODEs (5.4). The proofs follow the scheme used in [4] for computing the coefficients of Taylor expansion of the logarithm of the Witten–Kontsevich tau-function of the Korteweg–de Vries hierarchy. Details of the proofs can be found in an upcoming publication [5]. Let $$\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,N}$$ denote the Deligne–Mumford moduli space of stable curves $$C$$ of genus $$g$$ with $$N$$ marked points $$x_1$$, $$\dots$$, $$x_N$$, $$\mathcal{L}_k$$ the $$k$$th-tautological line bundle over $$\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,N}$$, $$\psi_k=c_1\left(\mathcal{L}_k \right)\in H^2\left( \overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,N}\right)$$, $$k=1,\dots,N.$$ Let $$r\geq 2$$ be an integer. Fix a set of integers $$\{a_k\}_{k=1}^N \subset \{0,\dots,r-1\}$$ such that $$2g-2-\sum_{k=1}^N a_k$$ is divisible by $$r$$. Then the degree of the line bundle $$K_C-\sum_{i=1}^N a_i x_i$$ is divisible by $$r$$. Here $$K_C$$ is the canonical class of the curve $$C$$. Hence there exists a line bundle $${\mathcal T}$$ such that T⊗r≃KC−∑i=1Naixi. (5.5) Such a line bundle is not unique; there are $$r^{2g}$$ choices of $${\mathcal T}$$. A choice of such a line bundle $${\mathcal T}$$ is called an $$r$$-spin structure [17, 37] on the curve $$(C, x_1, \dots, x_N)\in\overline{\mathcal M}_{g,N}$$. The space of all $$r$$-spin structures admits a natural compactification $$\overline{\mathcal M}^{1/r}_{g; a_1, \dots, a_N}$$ along with a forgetful map p:M¯g;a1,…,aN1/r→M¯g,N. There is a natural complex vector bundle $${\mathcal V}\to \overline{\mathcal M}^{1/r}_{g; a_1, \dots, a_N}$$ such that the fiber over the generic point $$(C, x_1, \dots, x_N, {\mathcal T})\in \overline{\mathcal M}^{1/r}_{g; a_1, \dots, a_N} $$ coincides with $$H^1(C, {\mathcal T})$$. Here the genericity assumption means that $$H^0(C,{\mathcal T})=0$$. Under this assumption, using the Riemann–Roch theorem one concludes that $${\rm rank}\, {\mathcal V}=s+g-1$$ where s=a1+⋯+aN−(2g−2)r. The construction of the vector bundle $${\mathcal V}$$ over non-generic points in $$\overline{\mathcal M}^{1/r}_{g; a_1, \dots, a_N}$$ is more subtle; for details see [17] and references therein. The Witten class$$c_W(a_1,\dots,a_N)\in H^{2(s+g-1)}\left( \overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,N}\right)$$ is defined via the push-forward of the Euler class of the dual vector bundle $${\mathcal V}^\vee$$ cW(a1,…,aN)=1rgp∗(euler(V∨)). (5.6) See more details on properties of $$c_W(a_1,\dots,a_N)$$ in [17, 22, 32, 36, 37]. Witten’s $$r$$-spin intersection numbers are nonnegative rational numbers defined by ⟨τi1,k1⋯τiN,kN⟩r−spin:=∫M¯g,Nψ1k1∧⋯∧ψNkN∧cW(i1−1,…,iN−1). (5.7) Here $$i_\ell \in \{1,\dots, r-1\}, \,k_\ell\geq 0,~ \ell=1,\dots, N.$$ We have assumed that the genus in l.h.s. of (5.7) is reconstructed by the dimension counting: i1−1r+⋯+iN−1r+r−2r(g−1)+k1+⋯+kN=3g−3+N. (5.8) See [3, 6, 7, 10, 22, 28, 29, 38] for some explicit calculations of Witten’s $$r$$-spin intersection numbers. According to Witten’s $$r$$-spin conjecture [37] the intersection numbers (5.7) are coefficients of Taylor expansion of logarithm of tau-function of a particular solution to the Drinfeld–Sokolov integrable hierarchy of the $$A_n$$ type, $$n=r-1$$. This conjecture was proved by Faber $$\textit{et al.}$$ [17]. We will now use the constructed above generalized Airy resolvents for a simple algorithm for computing the $$r$$-spin intersection numbers in all genera. For a given $$N\geq 1$$ and a given collection of indices $$i_1$$, $$\dots$$, $$i_N$$ satisfying $$1\leq i_\ell\leq r-1$$ define the following generating function of the $$N$$-point Witten’s $$r$$-spin intersection numbers by Fi1,…,iNr−spin(λ1,…,λN)=(−κ−r)N∑k1,…,kN≥0(−1)k1+⋯+kN∏ℓ=1N(iℓr)kℓ+1(κλℓ)iℓr+kℓ+1⟨τi1,k1…τiN,kN⟩r−spin. (5.9) Here $$\lambda_1$$, $$\dots$$, $$\lambda_N$$ are indeterminates, $$\kappa=(\sqrt{-r})^{-r}$$. We use the standard notation (4.2) for the Pochhammer symbol. Theorem 5.1 ([5]). Let $$n=r-1,\, \mathfrak{g}= sl_{n+1} (\mathbb{C})$$, $$\Lambda=\sum_{i=1}^n E_{i,i+1}+\lambda\, E_{n+1,1}.$$ Let $$M_i=M_i(\lambda)$$ be the basis of generalized Airy resolvents of $$\mathfrak{g}$$-type, uniquely determined by the topological ODE M′=κ[M,Λ],κ=(−r)−r (5.10) normalized by Mi=−λ−ihΛi+lower degree terms w.r.t. deg,Λi:=Λi. (5.11) Denote $$\eta_{ij}=\delta_{i+j,n+1}.$$ Then the generating functions (5.9) of $$N$$-point correlators of $$r$$-spin intersection numbers have the following expressions: dFir−spindλ(λ) = −κ(Mi)1,n+1(λ)−κλ−r−1rδi,n, (5.12) Fi1,…,iNr−spin(λ1,…,λN) = −1N∑s∈SNTr(Mis1(λs1)…MisN(λsN))∏j=1N(λsj−λsj+1) −δN2ηi1i2λ1−i1hλ2−i2h(i1λ1+i2λ2)(λ1−λ2)2,N≥2. (5.13) □ Up to a constant factor the entry $$(M_i)_{1,n+1}$$ is nothing but the essential series $$S_{i;n}.$$ Then, from (5.12) we expect that all one-point $$r$$-spin intersection numbers can be read off from coefficients of solutions to one linear ODE (for $$S_{;n}$$) expanded near $$\lambda=\infty$$. We also remark that alternative closed expressions for one-point $$r$$-spin intersection numbers have been obtained in [28] by using the Gelfand–Dickey pseudo-differential operators. Example 5.2 ($$r=2$$). Witten’s two-spin invariants coincide with intersection numbers of $$\psi$$-classes over $$\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{g,N}$$ [17, 26, 35]. So Theorem 5.1 in the choice $$r=2$$ recovers the result of [4, 39]: for $$N\geq 2,$$ ∑g=0∞∑p1,…,pN≥0(2p1+1)!!⋯(2pN+1)!!∫M¯g,Nψ1p1⋯ψNpNλ1−2p1+32⋯λN−2pN+32 =−1N∑r∈SNTr(M(λr1)⋯M(λrN))∏j=1N(λrj−λrj+1)−δN2λ1−12λ2−12(λ1+λ2)(λ1−λ2)2, (5.14) where $$M=-\frac{\lambda^{-\frac12}}{2}\left({-\frac{1}{2\kappa} \sum_{g=1}^\infty \frac{(6g-5)!!}{(96\,\kappa^2)^{g-1}\cdot (g-1)!} \lambda^{-3g+2} \atop -2 \sum_{g=0}^\infty\frac{6g+1}{6g-1} \frac{(6g-1)!!}{(96\,\kappa^2)^g\cdot g!} \lambda^{-3g+1}}\quad{2 \sum_{g=0}^\infty \frac{(6g-1)!!}{(96\,\kappa^2)^g\cdot g!} \lambda^{-3g} \atop \frac1{2\kappa} \sum_{g=1}^\infty \frac{(6g-5)!!}{(96\,\kappa^2)^{g-1}\cdot (g-1)!} \lambda^{-3g+2}} \right)\!,~\kappa=(-2)^{-1}.$$ The formula (5.14) is closely related to a new formula recently proved by Zhou [40] (see Theorem 6.1 therein). For $$N=1$$, it follows easily from (5.12) the well-known formula ⟨τ3g−2⟩g=124g⋅g!forg≥1. □ Example 5.3 ($$r=3$$). Define $$M=\left(\begin{array}{ccc} 2 K_{11} +K_{22} & - 2 S_1 -3 K_{23} & 6 S_2\\ 2 K_{10}+K_{21} & -2 K_{22} & 3 K_{23}-2 S_1\\ K_{20} & 2 K_{10} -K_{21} & -2 K_{11} +K_{22}\end{array}\right)\!,$$ where K10=S1″κ2+3λS2,K11=−S1′κ,K20=S2(4)κ4−2λS1,K21=−S2‴κ3,K22=S2″κ2,K23=−S2′κ. The generalized Airy resolvents $$M_1(\lambda)$$ and $$M_2(\lambda)$$ are obtained by replacing the functions $$S_1$$ and $$S_2$$ in the above expressions by S1;1 =12233κ2∑g=0∞(−1)g⋅37gΓ(8g+13)24g⋅g!⋅(54κ2)3g−1Γ(g+13)λ−24g+13, (5.15) S1;2 = −12332κ2∑g=0∞(−1)g⋅37gΓ(8g+103)24g⋅g!⋅(54κ2)3gΓ(g+43)λ−24g+103 (5.16) and S2;1 = −3423∑g=0∞(−1)g⋅37gΓ(8g+173)24g⋅g!⋅(54κ2)3g+2Γ(g+53)λ−24g+173, (5.17) S2;2 = −16∑g=0∞(−1)g⋅37gΓ(8g+23)24g⋅g!⋅(54κ2)3g⋅Γ(g+23)λ−24g+23, (5.18) respectively. Setting $$\kappa=(\sqrt{-r})^{-r}$$ we easily obtain from Theorem 5.1 that ⟨τ1,8g−7⟩g=129646656g⋅(g−1)!⋅(13)g(g≥1),⟨τ2,8g−2⟩g=146656g⋅g!⋅(23)g(g≥1),Fi1,…,iN3−spin(λ1,…,λN)=−1N∑s∈SNTr(Mis1(λs1)…MisN(λsN))∏j=1N(λsj−λsj+1)−δN2ηi1i2λ1−i1hλ2−i2h(i1λ1+i2λ2)(λ1−λ2)2,N≥2. The above formulae of one-point three-spin intersection numbers agree with known formulae in [7, 28, 29, 33]; for example, the first several of these numbers are given by ⟨τ1,1⟩1=112,⟨τ2,6⟩1=131104,⟨τ1,9⟩2=1746496,⟨τ2,14⟩2=14837294080. □ 5.3 Topological ODEs, Drinfeld–Sokolov hierarchies, and FJRW “quantum singularity theory” According to [18, 30], the partition function of FJRW invariants for an $$A\,D\,E,\,D^T_n$$ singularity with the maximal diagonal symmetry group is a tau-function of its mirror Drinfeld–Sokolov hierarchy; the partition function of FJRW invariants for a $$(D_{2k},\langle J\rangle)$$ singularity is a particular tau-function of the $$D_{2k}$$-Drinfeld–Sokolov hierarchy; the partition function of non-simply laced analogue of the FJRW intersection numbers is defined as a tau-function of the Drinfeld–Sokolov hierarchies of $$B\, C\, F\, G$$-type [30]. Definition 5.4. The Drinfeld–Sokolov partition function $$Z$$ is a tau-function of the Drinfeld–Sokolov hierarchy of $$\mathfrak{g}$$-type [11] uniquely specified by the following string equation: ∑i=1n∑k=0∞tk+1i∂Z∂tki+12∑i,j=1nηijt0it0jZ=∂Z∂t01. (5.19) Here, $$t^i_k$$ are time variables of the Drinfeld–Sokolov hierarchy and $$\eta_{ij}=\delta_{i+j,n+1}.$$ □ It should be noted that the terminology “the Drinfeld–Sokolov hierarchy of $$\mathfrak{g}$$-type” that we use refers to the Drinfeld–Sokolov hierarchy (under the choice of a principal nilpotent element) associated with the non-twisted affine Lie algebra $${{\widehat{\mathfrak{g}}}^{(1)}}.$$ Since the construction of this integrable hierarchy does not depend on the central extension of the loop algebra, it is essentially associated with the simple Lie algebra. Define the following generating functions of $$N$$-point correlators of $$Z$$ by Fi1,…,iN(λ1,…,λN)=(−κ−h)N∑k1,…,kN≥0∞(−1)k1+⋯+kN∏ℓ=1N(miℓh)kℓ+1(κλℓ)miℓh+kℓ+1∂NlogZ∂tk1i1…∂tkNiN(0). (5.20) We will now express these generating functions in terms of the generalized Airy resolvents of $$\mathfrak{g}$$-type. To this end we will need to use the following multilinear forms on the Lie algebra: B(a1,…,aN)=tr(ada1∘⋯∘adaN),∀a1,…,aN∈g. (5.21) Theorem 5.5. ([5]). Let $$\mathfrak{g}$$ be a simple Lie algebra of rank $$n$$. Let $$M_i=M_i(\lambda)$$, $$i=1, \dots, n$$ be the generalized Airy resolvents of $$\mathfrak{g}$$-type, which are the unique solutions to M′=κ[M,Λ],κ=(−h)−h (5.22) subjected to Mi=−λ−mihΛmi+lower degree terms w.r.t. deg. (5.23) Then the generating functions (5.9) for the $$N$$-point correlators of the Drinfeld–Sokolov partition function associated with $$\mathfrak{g}$$ are given by the following expressions: dFidλ(λ) = −κ2h∨B(E−θ,Mi)−κλ−h−1hδi,n, (5.24) Fi1,…,iN(λ1,…,λN) = −12Nh∨∑s∈SNB(Mis1(λs1),…,MisN(λsN))∏j=1N(λsj−λsj+1) −δN2ηi1i2λ1−mi1hλ2−mi2h(mi1λ1+mi2λ2)(λ1−λ2)2,N≥2. (5.25) Here, $$h^\vee$$ is the dual Coxeter number. □ Similarly as before, we expect that all one-point correlators of the Drinfeld–Sokolov partition function can be read off from coefficients of solutions to one linear ODE. The proof will be given in [5]. It is interesting to mention that for the $$ADE$$ cases, the correction term appearing in (5.25) for $$N=2$$ coincides with the propagators derived in [31] in the vertex algebra approach [1] to FJRW invariants; in these cases, the Drinfeld–Sokolov partition function coincides with the total descendant potential [15, 16, 20] of the corresponding Frobenius manifolds [12, 13]. It would also be interesting to investigate relations between the dual fundamental series and the hypergeometric functions considered in [21]. In subsequent publications we will continue the study of topological ODEs as well as their applications to computation of invariants of the Deligne–Mumford moduli spaces considering generalized Drinfeld–Sokolov hierarchies [8]. Funding The work was partially supported by PRIN 2010-11 Grant “Geometric and analytic theory of Hamiltonian systems in finite and infinite dimensions” of Italian Ministry of Universities and Researches; and the research of M. B. was supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) grant RGPIN/261229–2011 and by the Fonds de recherche Nature et téchnologie du Québec (FQRNT) grant “Matrices Aléatoires, Processus Stochastiques et Systèmes Intégrables” (2013–PR–166790). Acknowledgments We would like to thank Philip Candelas, Yassir Dinar, Si-Qi Liu, Youjin Zhang, and Jian Zhou for helpful discussions. D. Y. is grateful to Youjin Zhang for his advising. Appendix: Simple Lie Algebras and Generalized Airy Functions Let $$\mathfrak{g}$$ be an arbitrary simple Lie algebra of rank $$n$$. We consider in this appendix a $$\mathfrak{g}$$-generalization of equation (1.10). Let $$E_{-\theta}$$ and $$I_+$$ be defined as in the Introduction. Let $$\Lambda:=I_++\lambda\,E_{-\theta}$$. Throughout this appendix we will fix a matrix realization $$\pi:\,\mathfrak{g}\rightarrow {\rm Mat}\,(m,\mathbb{C})$$. Again for any $$A\in\mathfrak{g}$$ we simply write $$\pi(A)$$ as $$A.$$ Definition A.1. The system of $$m$$ linear ODEs dy→dλ+Λy→=0,y→=(y1,…,ym)T∈Cm,λ∈C (A.1) is called the generalized Airy system of $$\mathfrak{g}$$-type. □ The dimension of the space of solutions to (A.1) is $$m$$. Let $$Y:\mathbb{C}\rightarrow {\rm Mat}\,(m,\mathbb{C})$$ be a fundamental solution matrix of (A.1), that is, Y′+ΛY=0,det(Y)=const≠0. (A.2) Proposition A.2. Let $$A$$ be any constant matrix in $$\pi(\mathfrak{g})$$. The matrix-valued function $$M:=YAY^{-1}$$ is a solution of the topological ODE, that is, we have M′=[M,Λ]. (A.3) □ Proof By straightforward calculations. ■ Noting that $$\lambda=0$$ is a regular point of the generalized Airy system (A.1), we define a particular fundamental solution matrix $$Y$$ of (A.1) by using the following initial data: Y(0)=Im, (A.4) where $$I_m$$ denote the $$m\times m$$ identity matrix. Then we have Proposition A.3. Let $$\{M^{ak}\}_{a=1,\dots,n,\,k=0,\dots,2m_a}$$ denote the basis of $$\mathfrak{S}(\mathfrak{g})$$ defined by (5.2). Then π(Mak)=Yπ(adI+kγa)Y−1. (A.5) □ Proof By using Proposition A.2 and by using the standard uniqueness theorem for linear ODEs. ■ Corollary A.4. Let $$\{M_a\}_{a=1,\dots,n}$$ be a chosen (analytic) basis of $$\mathfrak{S}_\infty^{{\rm reg}}(\mathfrak{g})$$. Then we have π(Ma)=∑b=1n∑k=02mbCabkYπ(adI+kγa)Y−1, (A.6) where $$C_{abk}$$ are the corresponding partial connection numbers (cf. (5.3)). □ Example A.5 ($$A_n,\,n\geq 1$$). Take $$\mathfrak{g}=sl_{n+1}(\mathbb{C}).$$ We have $$m=n+1.$$ Any solution $$\vec{y}= (y_1=y,\,y_2,\dots,\,y_m)^T$$ of (A.1) satisfies that (−1)n+1y(n+1)=λy, (A.7) yk=(−1)k−1y(k−1), k=2,…,m. (A.8) Solutions to (A.7) can be represented by a Pearcey-type integral y(λ)=∫Cexp(xn+2n+2−λx)dx, (A.9) where $$C$$ is a suitable contour on the complex $$x$$-plane. □ Example A.6. ($$D_n,\,n\geq 4$$). Take the matrix realization of $$\mathfrak{g}$$ as in [11]. We have $$m=2n.$$ The cyclic element $$\Lambda$$ takes the form Λ=(01⋱112⋱012⋱1⋱λ210λ20). For any solution $$\vec{y}=(y_1=y,\,y_2,\dots,\,y_m)^T$$ to (A.1) we have y(2n−1)=λy′+12y,, (A.10) yk=(−1)k−1y(k−1),k=2,…,n−1, (A.11) yk=(−1)k−2y(k−2),k=n+2,…,2n−1, (A.12) 2yn′=yn+1′=(−1)n−1y(n),y2n=y(2n−2)−12λy. (A.13) Solutions to (A.10) can be represented by a Pearcey-type integral y(λ)=∫Cexp(−x4n−22n−1−λx2)dx, (A.14) where $$C$$ is a suitable contour in the complex $$x$$-plane. □ Example A.7. ($$B_n,\,n\geq 2$$). Take the matrix realization of $$\mathfrak{g}$$ as in [11]. We have $$m=2n+1,$$ and $$\mathfrak{g}= \{B\in {\rm Mat} (m,\mathbb{C})\,|\, B+ S\eta B \eta S =0\}$$ where $$\eta_{ij}=\delta_{i+j,2n+2}\,(1\leq i,j\leq 2n+1),$$$$S={\rm diag}\,(1,-1,1,-1,\dots,1,-1).$$ We have Λ=(010⋯0⋮⋱⋱⋱⋮00⋱⋱0λ20⋱⋱10λ20⋯0). Then any solution $$\vec{y}=(y_1=y,\,y_2,\dots,\,y_m)^T$$ of (A.1) satisfies y(2n+1)=λy′+12y, (A.15) yk=(−1)k−1y(k−1), k=2,…,m−1, (A.16) ym=(−1)m−1y(m−1)−λ2y. (A.17) Solutions to (A.15) can be represented by the following Pearcey-type integral y(λ)=∫Cexp(−x4n+22n+1−λx2)dx, (A.18) where $$C$$ is a suitable contour in the complex $$x$$-plane. □ Example A.8 ($$E_6$$). We take the matrix realization the same as in [14], where $$m=27.$$ The matrices $$I_+$$ and $$E_{-\theta}$$ can also be read off from [14]. The corresponding generalized Airy system reduces to two linear ODEs for $$y_1,\,y_6.$$ Denote by $$u(x),\,v(x)$$ the Laplace–Borel transforms of $$y_1,\,y_6$$, respectively: y1(λ)=∫Cu(x)e−λxdx,y6(λ)=∫Cv(x)e−λxdx. (A.19) Then $$u,v$$ satisfy the following system of ODEs: (u′v′)=1x(−1300−23)(uv)+(5x12−263x8−269x165x12)(uv). (A.20) It follows that −27x2u″(x)+(270x14+189x)u′+(x26+675x13+75)u=0, (A.21) −27x2v″(x)+(270x14+405x)v′+(x26−405x13+300)v=0. (A.22) Solving (A.21) we have u=c1x−13e5x13130F1(;23;−x2627)+c2x253e5x13130F1(;43;−x2627), (A.23) where $$c_1,c_2$$ are arbitrary constants. □ Applying the saddle point technique to the above integral representations one can derive asymptotic expansions for the generalized Airy functions. In principle, Proposition A.2 can be used for computing the asymptotic expansions of solutions to the topological ODE. However, the methods explained in the main part of the present paper seem to be more efficient for obtaining such expansions for regular solutions. Remark A.9. For the original construction [26] of the Witten–Kontsevich tau-function it was introduced a matrix analogue of the Airy integral. More recently in [19] the Kontsevich’s matrix Airy function was generalized for an arbitrary compact Lie group. For $$\mathfrak{g}=sl_{n+1}(\mathbb C)$$ the generalized matrix Airy function appears in [9] in representation of the tau-function of the Drinfeld–Sokolov hierarchy associated with the $$r$$-spin intersection numbers on $$\overline{\mathcal M}_{g,N}$$, $$n=r-1$$. It is not clear whether the generalized matrix Airy functions of [19] for other simple Lie algebras can be used for computing the FJRW intersection numbers. □ References [1] Bakalov B. and Milanov. T. “$$\mathcal{W}$$-constraints for the total descendant potential of a simple singularity.” Compositio Mathematica 149, no. 5 (2013): 840– 88. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [2] Balog J. Fehér L. O’Raifeartaigh L. Forgacs P. and Wipf A. “Toda theory and W-algebra from a gauged WZNW point of view.” Annals of Physics 203, no. 1 (1990): 76– 136. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [3] Balogh F. Yang D. and Zhou. J. “Explicit formula for Witten’s $$r$$-spin partition function” (in press). [4] Bertola M. Dubrovin B. and Yang. D. “Correlation functions of the KdV hierarchy and applications to intersection numbers over $$\overline{\mathcal M}_{g,n}$$.” Physica D. Nonlinear Phenomena 327 (2016): 30– 57. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [5] Bertola M. Dubrovin B. and Yang. D. “Simple Lie algebras, Drinfeld–Sokolov hierarchies, and multipoint correlation functions.” (2016): preprint arXiv:1610.07534. [6] Brézin E. and Hikami. S. “Intersection numbers of Riemann surfaces from Gaussian matrix models.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2007 , no. 10 (2007): 96. [7] Brézin E. and Hikami. S. “Computing topological invariants with one and two-matrix models.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2009, no. 4 (2009): 110. [8] De Groot M. F. Hollowood T. J. and Miramontes. J. L. “Generalized Drinfel’d-Sokolov hierarchies.” Communications in Mathematical Physics 145, no. 1 (1992): 57– 84. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [9] Dijkgraaf R. “Intersection theory, integrable hierarchies and topological field theory.” In New Symmetry Principles in Quantum Field Theory , edited by Fröhlich J. et al. , NATO ASI Series 295, 95– 158, Plenum Press, New York, 1992. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [10] Ding X.-M. Li Y. and Meng. L. “From $$r$$-Spin Intersection Numbers to Hodge Integrals.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2016, no. 1 (2016): 15. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [11] Drinfeld V. G. and Sokolov. V. V. “Lie algebras and equations of Korteweg–de Vries type.” Journal of Mathematical Sciences 30, no. 2 (1985): 1975– 2036. ( Translated from Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki, Seriya Sovremennye Problemy Matematiki (Noveishie Dostizheniya) 24 (1984): 81–180.) [12] Dubrovin B. “Geometry of 2D topological field theories.” In Integrable Systems and Quantum Groups (Montecatini Terme, 1993) , edited by Francaviglia M. and Greco. S. Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1620, 120– 348. 1996. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [13] Dubrovin B. “Painlevé transcendents in two-dimensional topological field theory.” In The Painlevé Property , edited by Conte R. 287– 412. New York: Springer, 1999. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [14] Dubrovin B. Liu S.-Q. and Zhang. Y. “Frobenius manifolds and central invariants for the Drinfeld–Sokolov biHamiltonian structures.” Advances in Mathematics 219, no. 3 (2008): 780– 837. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [15] Dubrovin B. and Zhang. Y. “Bihamiltonian hierarchies in 2D topological field theory at one-loop approximation.” Communications in Mathematical Physics 198, no. 2 (1998): 311– 61. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [16] Dubrovin B. and Zhang. Y. “Normal forms of hierarchies of integrable PDEs, Frobenius manifolds and Gromov–Witten invariants.” (2001): Preprint arXiv:math/0108160. [17] Faber C. Shadrin S. and Zvonkine. D. “Tautological relations and the $$r$$-spin Witten conjecture.” In Annales Scientifiques de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure 43, no. 4 (2010): 621– 58. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [18] Fan H. Jarvis T. and Ruan. Y. “The Witten equation, mirror symmetry, and quantum singularity theory.” Annals of Mathematics 178, no. 1 (2013): 1– 106. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [19] Fernandez R. N. and Varadarajan. V. S. “Airy functions for compact Lie groups.” International Journal of Mathematics 20 (2009): 945– 77. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [20] Givental A. “Gromov–Witten invariants and quantization of quadratic Hamiltonians.” Moscow Mathematical Journal 1, no. 4 (2001): 551– 68. [21] Heckman G. J. and Opdam. E. M. “Root systems and hypergeometric functions. I.” Compositio Mathematica 64, no. 3 (1987): 329– 52. [22] Jarvis T. J. Kimura T. and Vaintrob. A. “Spin Gromov–Witten invariants.” Communications in Mathematical Physics 259, no. 3 (2005): 511– 43. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [23] Kac V. G. “Infinite-dimensional algebras, Dedekind’s $$\eta$$-function, classical Möbius function and the very strange formula.” Advances in Mathematics 30, no. 2 (1978): 85– 136. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [24] Kac V. G. Infinite-Dimensional Lie Algebras , vol. 44. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994. [25] Kac V. G. and Wakimoto. M. “Exceptional Hierarchies of Soliton Equations.” In Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics , edited by Ehrenpreis L. et al. . (Theta Functions Bowdoin 1987), vol. 49, 191– 237, Providence, RI, American Mathematical Society, 1989. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [26] Kontsevich M. “Intersection theory on the moduli space of curves and the matrix Airy function.” Communications in Mathematical Physics 147, no. 1 (1992): 1– 23. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [27] Kostant B. “The principal three-dimensional subgroup and the Betti numbers of a complex simple Lie group.” American Journal of Mathematics 81 (1959): 973– 1032. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [28] Liu K. Vakil R. and Xu. H. “Formal pseudodifferential operators and Witten’s $$r$$-spin numbers.” Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) (2011). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/crelle-2014-0102 (accessed on December 23, 2014). [29] Liu K. and Xu. H. “Descendent integrals and tautological rings of moduli spaces of curves.” In Geometry and Analysis , vol. 2. Advanced Lecturers in Mathematics, edited by Ji L. 18, 137– 72, Somerville, MA, USA, International Press of Boston, 2010. [30] Liu S.-Q. Ruan Y. and Zhang. Y. “BCFG Drinfeld–Sokolov hierarchies and FJRW-theory.” Inventiones Mathematicae 201, no. 2 (2015): 711– 72. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [31] Liu S.-Q. Yang D. and Zhang. Y. “Uniqueness theorem of $$\mathcal{W}$$-constraints for simple singularities.” Letters in Mathematical Physics 103, no. 12 (2013): 1329– 45. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [32] Polishchuk A. and Vaintrob. A. “Algebraic construction of Witten’s Top Chern Class.” In Advances in Algebraic Geometry Motivated by Physics (Lowell, MA, 2000) , edited by Previato E. 229– 50. AMS, Providence, RI, Special Session on Enumerative Geometry in Physics. Contemporary Mathematics 276, 2001. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [33] Shadrin S. V. “Geometry of meromorphic functions and intersections onmoduli spaces of curves.” International Mathematics Research Notices 2003, no. 38 (2003): 2051– 94. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [34] Wasow W. Asymptotic Expansions for Ordinary Differential Equations . New York/London/Sydney: Interscience Publishers, A Division of John Wiley and Sons Inc., 1965. [35] Witten E. “Two-dimensional gravity and intersection theory on moduli space.” Surveys in Differential Geometry 1 (1991): 243– 310. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [36] Witten E. “The $$N$$ matrix model and gauged WZW models.” Nuclear Physics B 371 (1992): 191– 245. [37] Witten E. “Algebraic geometry associated with matrix models of two-dimensional gravity.” Topological Methods in Modern Mathematics (Stony Brook, NY, 1991) , 235– 69. Houston, TX: Publish or Perish, 1993. [38] Zhou J. “Solution of W-constraints for R-spin intersection numbers.” (2013): arXiv:1305.6991. [39] Zhou J. “On absolute N-point function associated with Gelfand–Dickey polynomials.” (2015): preprint. [40] Zhou J. “Emergent geometry and mirror symmetry of a point.” (2015): preprint arXiv:1507.01679. © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices) For permissions, please e-mail: journals. permissions@oup.com

International Mathematics Research Notices – Oxford University Press

**Published: ** Mar 1, 2018

Loading...

personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly

**discover** and **read** the research

that matters to you.

Enjoy **affordable access** to

over 18 million articles from more than

**15,000 peer-reviewed journals**.

All for just $49/month

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from *SpringerNature*, *Elsevier*, *Wiley-Blackwell*, *Oxford University Press* and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

## “Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”

Daniel C.

## “Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”

@Phil_Robichaud

## “I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”

@deepthiw

## “My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”

@JoseServera

DeepDyve ## Freelancer | DeepDyve ## Pro | |
---|---|---|

Price | FREE | $49/month |

Save searches from | ||

Create lists to | ||

Export lists, citations | ||

Read DeepDyve articles | Abstract access only | Unlimited access to over |

20 pages / month | ||

PDF Discount | 20% off | |

Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.

System error. Please try again!

or

By signing up, you agree to DeepDyve’s Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Already have an account? Log in

Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.

To save an article, **log in** first, or **sign up** for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.

All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.

ok to continue