Abstract The Society of Behavioral Medicine supports the inclusion of gender and sexual minorities in all local, state, and national tobacco prevention and control activities. These activities include surveillance of tobacco use and cessation activities, targeted outreach and awareness campaigns, increasing access to culturally appropriate tobacco use dependence treatments, and restricting disproportionate marketing to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender communities by the tobacco industry, especially for mentholated tobacco products. Implications Practice: As the level of comfort and competency in addressing lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) health issues remains low among healthcare providers, more training on the health promotion needs of gender and sexual minorities related to tobacco use and beyond is needed. Policy: Policymakers should include gender and sexual minorities in all local, state, and national tobacco prevention and control activities, including surveillance of tobacco use and cessation activities, targeted outreach and awareness campaigns, increasing access to culturally appropriate tobacco use dependence treatments, and restricting disproportionate marketing to LGBT communities by the tobacco industry. Research: Consistent and valid measures of both sexual orientation and gender identity on all local, state, and national health surveys is needed, as well as increased funding for tobacco research in gender and sexual minority populations. Background Smoking remains the leading preventable cause of death and disease in the USA, and each year more than 480,000 people die prematurely from smoking or secondhand smoke exposure . Sexual and gender minorities (e.g., LGBT persons) are at elevated risk for tobacco-related health disparities due to disproportionately high rates of tobacco use [2, 3]. Reasons cited for this elevated risk include discrimination, stigma, targeted marketing by the tobacco industry, and normalization of tobacco in community spaces and organizations [4, 5]. For example: • A recent national study found that 24% of lesbian, gay, or bisexual adults smoked compared to 17% of heterosexual adults . • A 2013 study found transgender adults to have an even larger disparity, with 36% reporting smoking compared to 21% of heterosexual adults . • LGBT youth smoke at disproportionately higher rates than their heterosexual peers . • There is a higher prevalence of mentholated tobacco use among LGBT smokers , which increases nicotine addiction levels and increases difficulty in smoking cessation . • Sexual and gender minorities are more likely to be exposed to involuntary smoking than their heterosexual counterparts . • Several major cigarette companies have launched strategic advertisement campaigns aimed at LGBT communities [12, 13]. • LGBT smokers are exposed to few tobacco cessation messages in LGBT-focused media [14, 15]. Despite these disparities, gender and sexual minorities are not systematically included in tobacco prevention and control efforts . Little is known as to whether evidence-based tobacco control interventions improve or exacerbate disparities for sexual and gender minority populations . What we do know: • Evidence-based smoking cessation coaching services (e.g., quit lines) may be under-used by LGBT smokers . • Rigorously conducted smoking cessation intervention studies have not been published with LGBT smokers . • While the Center for Disease Control’s (CDC) Tips from Former Smokers campaign highlights stories from the LGBT community , only one evaluation of an LGBT-targeted media campaign has been published to date . • The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Real Cost Campaign , which invested $36 million in changing LGBT young adults’ social norms around tobacco use, represents an important movement toward investing in targeted media campaigns. In the Fall of 2016, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) designated the LGBT community as a health disparity population , underscoring the importance of advocating for the inclusion of sexual and gender minority persons in tobacco prevention and control efforts now. ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT POLICIES 1. Surveillance for monitoring tobacco use and policy interventions is limited by gaps in knowledge and systems. • Monitoring tobacco use at the local, state, and national levels does not systematically include gender and sexual minorities . • Comprehensive and valid sexual orientation and gender identity questions are often omitted from demographics section of surveys . • There is a lack of systematic clinical data and outcome data on smoking-related death and disease among LGBT populations . • Tracking of organizational policies on tobacco use, industry funding, and cessation services at community festivals (e.g., Pride Parades/Festivals), healthcare organizations (e.g., LGBT-serving health centers), and advocacy groups (e.g., LGBT-rights organizations) . • Assessment of if evidence-based tobacco control interventions effectiveness is moderated by sexual orientation, as they are by socioeconomic status . 2. Outreach to at-risk group using media, healthcare providers, and research and dissemination efforts is limited. • National educational and outreach campaigns inconsistently include gender and sexual minorities . • Limited funding to support the development of effective smoking cessation interventions for LGBT smokers . • Lack of mandated education on the needs of gender and sexual minority smokers among smoking cessation treatment providers . 3. Healthcare provider training is limited. • Reported rates of discrimination in healthcare settings remains high among LGBT persons . • Level of comfort and competency in addressing LGBT health issues remains low among providers . • While state quitline trainings regarding LGBT smokers are available not all states have undergone systematic training to increase cultural competency . 4. Disproportionate tobacco industry marketing to LGBT communities. • The tobacco industry consistently funds LGBT pride and other community events . • Same-sex couples are more likely to reside in areas with higher tobacco retailer density . • LGBT people are disproportionately impacted by tobacco industry marketing . 5. Lack of national action on regulation and taxation of tobacco products. • Lack of FDA regulation of menthol flavored tobacco products, which are used by higher percentages of LGBT smokers . • No national clean indoor air acts aimed at reducing exposure to involuntary smoking which LGBT individuals experience at higher rates . • State tobacco taxes are a deterrent to smoking initiation among youth ; however, tobacco taxes are inconsistent from state to state. POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations for departments of public health and healthcare organizations on surveillance: 1. Include gender and sexual minorities in all local, state, and national surveys of smoking behaviors. 2. Use consistent and valid measures of both sexual orientation and gender identity on all local, state, and national tobacco-specific as well as other health surveys. 3. Advocate for the inclusion of gender and sexual orientation in electronic health records and include information about gender identity and sexual orientation in state cancer registries. Recommendations for health organizations, campaigns, and research-funding bodies: 1. Develop targeted smoking cessation media campaigns for gender and sexual minorities including smokers who also belong to ethnic and racial minority groups. 2. Include gender- and sexual minority-specific messages in all media campaigns aimed at increasing education and outreach regarding tobacco prevention and smoking cessation treatment services. 3. Allocate funding to increase research on tobacco prevention and cessation among LGBT individuals. 4. Increase training of healthcare providers on the health and health promotion needs of gender and sexual minorities, especially as it relates to tobacco use. Recommendations for federal policymakers: 1 Develop national clean air acts aimed at reducing exposure to secondhand smoke among LGBT nonsmokers. 2. Advocate for a minimal level cost for all tobacco products that would deter youth from initiating smoking and motivate current smokers to make a quit attempt . 3. Given evidence of wage discrimination against LGBT communities , increase the per-unit cost of tobacco products to reduce LGBT disparities . 4. Monitor and address disproportionate tobacco industry marketing in LGBT communities and publications. PARTNERSHIPS The organizations that have endorsed this policy brief are: • African American Tobacco Prevention Network • American Academy of Nursing • Gay and Lesbian Medical Association (GLMA) • Howard Brown Health Center, Chicago, IL • Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing at Northwestern University • LGBT HealthLink, a Program of CenterLink • National LGBT Cancer Network • Pride Action Tank of the AIDS Foundation of Chicago RESOURCES • American Lung Association’s Disparities in Lung Health Series: Smoking Out a Deadly Threat; Tobacco Use in the LGBT Community Report. This report examines tobacco use in the LGBT community and highlights the need for additional research. http://www.lung.org/assets/documents/research/lgbt-report.pdf. • Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s Tips From Former Smokers™ campaign. This campaign features “Real Stories: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) People Featured in Tips™.” https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/campaign/tips/groups/lgbt.html. • MPOWERED: Best and Promising Practices for LGBT Tobacco Prevention and Control. http://www.lgbthealthlink.org/Assets/U/documents/mpowered.pdf. Compliance with Ethical Standards Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest. Author Disclosures: The findings reported have not been previously published and the manuscript is not being simultaneously submitted elsewhere. A shortened version of this brief has been included in a press release from SBM in 2017. The authors have full control of all primary data and that they agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested. This policy brief was written as a part of the SBM Health Policy Committee. The manuscript does not contain any information that would violate human rights nor does the manuscript have any impact on the welfare of animals. No IRB approval was required nor was informed consent required as the manuscript does not contact any information collected from human subject research. This manuscript does not violate the ethical standards of the declaration of Helsinki as it does not involve any human subjects research. References 1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General . Atlanta, GA : U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health ; 2014 . Available at https://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/50-years-of-progress/full-report.pdf. Accessibility verified August 25, 2017 . 2. Johnson SE , Holder-Hayes E , Tessman GK , King BA , Alexander T , Zhao X . Tobacco product use among sexual minority adults: findings from the 2012–2013 National Adult Tobacco Survey . Am J Prev Med . 2016 ; 50 ( 4 ): e91 – e100 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 3. Agaku IT , King BA , Husten CG et al. ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . Tobacco product use among adults—United States, 2012–2013 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2014 ; 63 ( 25 ): 542 – 547 . Google Scholar PubMed 4. Blosnich J , Lee JG , Horn K . A systematic review of the aetiology of tobacco disparities for sexual minorities . Tob Control . 2013 ; 22 ( 2 ): 66 – 73 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 5. Offen N , Smith EA , Malone RE . Is tobacco a gay issue? Interviews with leaders of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community . Cult Health Sex . 2008 ; 10 ( 2 ): 143 – 157 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 6. Jamal A , Homa DM , O’Connor E et al. Current cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2005–2014 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2015 ; 64 ( 44 ): 1233 – 1240 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 7. Buchting FO , Emory KT , Scout et al. Transgender use of cigarettes, cigars, and E-cigarettes in a national study . Am J Prev Med . 2017 ; 53 ( 1 ): e1 – e7 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 8. Austin SB , Ziyadeh N , Fisher LB , Kahn JA , Colditz GA , Frazier AL . Sexual orientation and tobacco use in a cohort study of US adolescent girls and boys . Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med . 2004 ; 158 ( 4 ): 317 – 322 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 9. Fallin A , Goodin AJ , King BA . Menthol cigarette smoking among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adults . Am J Prev Med . 2015 ; 48 ( 1 ): 93 – 97 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 10. Fagan P , Pohkrel P , Herzog T et al. Comparisons of three nicotine dependence scales in a multiethnic sample of young adult menthol and non-menthol smokers . Drug Alcohol Depend . 2015 ; 149 : 203 – 211 . PMID: 25744873. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 11. Max WB , Stark B , Sung HY , Offen N . Sexual identity disparities in smoking and secondhand smoke exposure in California: 2003–2013 . Am J Public Health . 2016 ; 106 ( 6 ): 1136 – 1142 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 12. Yamey G . Gay tobacco ads come out of the closet . BMJ . 2003 ; 327 ( 7409 ): 296 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS 13. Stevens P , Carlson LM , Hinman JM . An analysis of tobacco industry marketing to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) populations: Strategies for mainstream tobacco control and prevention . Health Promot Pract . 2004 ; 5 ( suppl 3 ): 129S – 134S . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 14. Smith EA , Offen N , Malone RE . Pictures worth a thousand words: Noncommercial tobacco content in the lesbian, gay, and bisexual press . J Health Commun . 2006 ; 11 ( 7 ): 635 – 649 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 15. Matthews AK , Balsam K , Hotton A , Kuhns L , Li CC , Bowen DJ . Awareness of media-based antitobacco messages among a community sample of LGBT individuals . Health Promot Pract . 2014 ; 15 ( 6 ): 857 – 866 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 16. Lee JG , Matthews AK , McCullen CA , Melvin CL . Promotion of tobacco use cessation for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: A systematic review . Am J Prev Med . 2014 ; 47 ( 6 ): 823 – 831 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 17. Burns EK , Deaton EA , Levinson AH . Rates and reasons: disparities in low intentions to use a state smoking cessation quitline . Am J Health Promot . 2011 ; 25 ( suppl 5 ): S59 – S65 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 18. Center for Disease Control and Prevention . Real stories: lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people featured in Tips™ . 2017 . Available at https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/campaign/tips/groups/lgbt.html. Accessibility verified August 25, 2017 . 19. Plant A , Montoya JA , Tyree R et al. The break up: evaluation of an anti-smoking educational campaign for lesbians, gays, and bisexuals in Los Angeles County . J Health Commun . 2017 ; 22 ( 1 ): 29 – 36 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 20. U.S. Food and Drug Administration . This Free Life. 2017. Available at https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm498544.htm. Accessibility verified February 12, 2018. . 21. Pérez-Stable EJ. Sexual and gender minorities formally designated as a health disparity population for research purposes. Director’s Message 2016 . Availability at https://www.nimhd.nih.gov/about/directors-corner/message.html. Accessibility verified August 25, 2017. 22. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender Health Issues and Research Gaps and Opportunities . The Health of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People: Building a Foundation for Better Understanding . Washington, DC : National Academies Press ; 2011 . 23. The Network for LGBT Health Equity . MPOWERED: Best and Promising Practices for LGBT Tobacco Prevention and Control . 2012 . Available at http://www.lgbthealthlink.org/Assets/U/documents/mpowered.pdf. Accessibility verified August 25, 2017. 24. Drabble L . Alcohol, tobacco, and pharmaceutical industry funding: Considerations for organizations serving lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender communities . J Gay Lesbian Soc Services . 2000 ; 11 ( 1 ): 1 – 26 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS 25. Hill S , Amos A , Clifford D , Platt S . Impact of tobacco control interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: Review of the evidence . Tob Control . 2014 ; 23 ( e2 ): e89 – e97 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 26. Coulter RW , Kenst KS , Bowen DJ , Scout . Research funded by the National Institutes of Health on the health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations . Am J Public Health . 2014 ; 104 ( 2 ): e105 – e112 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 27. Starr S , Wallace DC . Self-reported cultural competence of public health nurses in a Southeastern U.S. Public Health Department . Public Health Nurs . 2009 ; 26 ( 1 ): 48 – 57 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 28. Sabin JA , Riskind RG , Nosek BA . Health care providers’ implicit and explicit attitudes toward lesbian women and gay men . Am J Public Health . 2015 ; 105 ( 9 ): 1831 – 1841 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 29. Jabson JM , Mitchell JW , Doty SB . Associations between non-discrimination and training policies and physicians’ attitudes and knowledge about sexual and gender minority patients: a comparison of physicians from two hospitals . BMC Public Health . 2016 ; 16 : 256 . PMID: 26968373. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 30. National LGBT Tobacco Control Network . Making Minnesota’s Quitline Accessible to LGBT’s: A Case Study of a Successful LGBT Tobacco Control Effort . 2008 . Available at http://www.lgbttobacco.org/files/SOL%20V2%20_quitlines.pdf. Accessibility verified August 25, 2017. 31. Dilley JA , Spigner C , Boysun MJ , Dent CW , Pizacani BA . Does tobacco industry marketing excessively impact lesbian, gay and bisexual communities ? Tob Control . 2008 ; 17 ( 6 ): 385 – 390 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 32. Lee JG , Pan WK , Henriksen L , Goldstein AO , Ribisl KM . Is there a relationship between the concentration of same-sex couples and tobacco retailer density ? Nicotine Tob Res . 2016 ; 18 ( 2 ): 147 – 155 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 33. van Hasselt M , Kruger J , Han B et al. The relation between tobacco taxes and youth and young adult smoking: what happened following the 2009 U.S. federal tax increase on cigarettes ? Addict Behav . 2015 ; 45 : 104 – 109 . PMID: 25658771. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 34. Doogan NJ , Wewers ME , Berman M . The impact of a federal cigarette minimum pack price policy on cigarette use in the USA . Tob Control . 2017 . PMID: 28259846; doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053457 . [Epub ahead of print]. 35. Martell ME . Differences do not matter: Exploring the wage gap for same-sex behaving men . Eastern Econ J . 2013 ; 39 ( 1 ): 45 – 71 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS © The Society of Behavioral Medicine 2018. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: email@example.com This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices)
Translational Behavioral Medicine – Oxford University Press
Published: Jan 27, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera