Proposed Grading System to Predict the Extent of Resection and Outcomes for Cranial Base Meningiomas

Proposed Grading System to Predict the Extent of Resection and Outcomes for Cranial Base Meningiomas AbstractOBJECTIVE:This investigation was performed to construct a grading system for cranial base meningiomas that augments the current system of topographic labeling. This new system classifies cranial base meningiomas based on predicted surgical resection and patient outcomes.METHODS:Two hundred thirty-two consecutive patients with cranial base meningiomas were surgically treated by the two senior authors between April 1993 and August 1997. Using standard statistical tests, a large number of preoperative, intraoperative, and follow-up findings were analyzed for correlation with the extent of resection. These included the presence of previous radiotherapy, Cranial Nerve III, V, and VI palsies, multiple fossa involvement, and vessel encasement.RESULTS:Analysis revealed that each variable tested was independently and inversely correlated with total tumor resection (P < 0.002). We were able to construct a grading system based on these variables; when more variables are present, the grade is higher. With the grading system, lower-grade tumors were correlated with increased probabilities of total resection (r2 = 0.9947) and better patient outcomes, as measured by Karnofsky performance scale scores (r2 = 0.9291). We also found that, as a group, patients who underwent subtotal resection exhibited worse Karnofsky performance scale scores and had longer hospital stays.CONCLUSION:The current system of classifying cranial base meningiomas provides no information regarding the tumor except location and no information concerning patient prognosis. We present a more useful system to categorize these tumors. Our scheme must be tested at other centers to corroborate our findings. This new grading system should serve to guide surgical treatment, inform patients, and improve communication among surgeons. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Neurosurgery Oxford University Press

Proposed Grading System to Predict the Extent of Resection and Outcomes for Cranial Base Meningiomas

Proposed Grading System to Predict the Extent of Resection and Outcomes for Cranial Base Meningiomas

Proposed Grading System to Predict the Extent of Resection and Outcomes for Cranial Base Meningiomas Zachary T. Levine, M.D., Russell I. Buchanan, M.D., Laligam N. Sekhar, M.D., Charles L. Rosen, M.D., Ph.D., Donald C. Wright, M.D. Department of Neurological Surgery, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia OBJECTIVE: This investigation was performed to construct a grading system for cranial base meningiomas that augments the current system of topographic labeling. This new system classifies cranial base meningiomas based on predicted surgical resection and patient outcomes. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-two consecutive patients with cranial base meningiomas were surgically treated by the two senior authors between April 1993 and August 1997. Using standard statistical tests, a large number of preoperative, intraoperative, and follow-up findings were analyzed for correlation with the extent of resection. These included the presence of previous radiotherapy, Cranial Nerve III, V, and VI palsies, multiple fossa involvement, and vessel encasement. RESULTS: Analysis revealed that each variable tested was independently and inversely correlated with total tumor resection (P < 0.002). W e were able to construct a grading system based on these variables; when more variables are present, the grade is higher. W ith the grading system, lower-grade tumors were correlated with increased probabilities of total resection (r2 = 0.9947) and better patient outcomes, as measured by Karnofsky performance scale scores (r2 = 0.9291). W e also found that, as a group, patients who underwent subtotal resection exhibited worse Karnofsky performance scale scores and had longer hospital stays. CO NCLUSIO N: The current system of classifying cranial base meningiomas provides no information regarding the tumor except location and no information concerning patient prognosis. W e present a more useful system to categorize these tumors. O ur scheme must be...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/ou_press/proposed-grading-system-to-predict-the-extent-of-resection-and-XPs25YYMVw
Publisher
Congress of Neurological Surgeons
Copyright
© Published by Oxford University Press.
ISSN
0148-396X
eISSN
1524-4040
D.O.I.
10.1097/00006123-199908000-00003
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractOBJECTIVE:This investigation was performed to construct a grading system for cranial base meningiomas that augments the current system of topographic labeling. This new system classifies cranial base meningiomas based on predicted surgical resection and patient outcomes.METHODS:Two hundred thirty-two consecutive patients with cranial base meningiomas were surgically treated by the two senior authors between April 1993 and August 1997. Using standard statistical tests, a large number of preoperative, intraoperative, and follow-up findings were analyzed for correlation with the extent of resection. These included the presence of previous radiotherapy, Cranial Nerve III, V, and VI palsies, multiple fossa involvement, and vessel encasement.RESULTS:Analysis revealed that each variable tested was independently and inversely correlated with total tumor resection (P < 0.002). We were able to construct a grading system based on these variables; when more variables are present, the grade is higher. With the grading system, lower-grade tumors were correlated with increased probabilities of total resection (r2 = 0.9947) and better patient outcomes, as measured by Karnofsky performance scale scores (r2 = 0.9291). We also found that, as a group, patients who underwent subtotal resection exhibited worse Karnofsky performance scale scores and had longer hospital stays.CONCLUSION:The current system of classifying cranial base meningiomas provides no information regarding the tumor except location and no information concerning patient prognosis. We present a more useful system to categorize these tumors. Our scheme must be tested at other centers to corroborate our findings. This new grading system should serve to guide surgical treatment, inform patients, and improve communication among surgeons.

Journal

NeurosurgeryOxford University Press

Published: Aug 1, 1999

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial