AbstractOBJECTIVETo assess the outcomes associated with C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation.METHODSThe clinical outcomes of 121 patients treated with posterior C1-C2 transarticular screws and wired posterior C1-C2 autologous bone struts were evaluated prospectively. Atlantoaxial instability was caused by rheumatoid arthritis in 48 patients, C1 or C2 fractures in 45, transverse ligament disruption in 11, os odontoideum in 9, tumors in 6, and infection in 2.RESULTSAltogether, 226 screws were placed under lateral fluoroscopic guidance. Bilateral C1-C2 screws were placed in 105 patients; each of 16 patients had only one screw placed because of an anomalous vertebral artery (n = 13) or other pathological abnormality. Postoperatively, each patient underwent radiography and computed tomography to assess the position of the screw and healing. Most screws (221 screws, 98%) were positioned satisfactorily. Five screws were malpositioned (2%), but none were associated with clinical sequelae. Four malpositioned screws were reoperated on (one was repositioned, and three were removed). No patients had neurological complications, strokes, or transient ischemic attacks. Long-term follow-up (mean, 22 mo) of 114 patients demonstrated a 98% fusion rate. Two nonunions (2%) required occipitocervical fixation. In comparison, our C1-C2 fixations with wires and autograft (n = 74) had an 86% union rate.CONCLUSIONRigidly fixating C1-C2 instability with transarticular screws was associated with a significantly higher fusion rate than that achieved using wired grafts alone. The risk of screw malpositioning and catastrophic vascular or neural injury is small and can be minimized by assessing the position of the foramen transversaria on preoperative computed tomographic scans and by using intraoperative fluoroscopy and frameless stereotaxy to guide the screw trajectory.
Neurosurgery – Oxford University Press
Published: Aug 1, 1998
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.
Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.
It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera