Add Journal to My Library
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters
, Volume 474 (1) – Feb 1, 2018

5 pages

/lp/ou_press/positron-annihilation-in-the-nuclear-outflows-of-the-milky-way-Dwux3FWX2z

- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Copyright
- © 2017 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society
- ISSN
- 1745-3925
- eISSN
- 1745-3933
- D.O.I.
- 10.1093/mnrasl/slx183
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract Observations of soft gamma rays emanating from the Milky Way from SPI/INTEGRAL reveal the annihilation of ∼2 × 1043 positrons every second in the Galactic bulge. The origin of these positrons, which annihilate to produce a prominent emission line centred at 511 keV, has remained mysterious since their discovery almost 50 yr ago. A plausible origin for the positrons is in association with the intense star formation ongoing in the Galactic centre. Moreover, there is strong evidence for a nuclear outflow in the Milky Way. We find that advective transport and subsequent annihilation of positrons in such an outflow cannot simultaneously replicate the observed morphology of positron annihilation in the Galactic bulge and satisfy the requirement that 90 per cent of positrons annihilate once the outflow has cooled to 104 K. ISM: general, Galaxy: centre, gamma-rays: ISM 1 INTRODUCTION The Milky Way hosts the annihilation of ∼5 × 1043 positrons each second (Siegert et al. 2016b). The annihilation of positrons is detected indirectly through measurements of gamma rays and is characterized by a strong emission line centred at 511 keV, the rest mass energy of the positron (or electron). Positron annihilation in the Milky Way was first detected by balloon-bourne spectrometers in the early 1970s (Johnson, Harnden & Haymes 1972): A notable excess of emission at ∼0.5 MeV was observed to be concentrated towards the centre of the Galaxy. However, the spatial resolution of such instruments was poor. The most recent observations with SPI/INTEGRAL (Knödlseder et al. 2005; Weidenspointner et al. 2008; Siegert et al. 2016b) allow detailed morphological models of positron annihilation gamma rays to be constructed. The most recent morphological models of positron annihilation in the Galactic bulge are described in Siegert et al. (2016b), where the emission is modelled as the superposition of two two-dimensional Gaussians. Siegert et al. (2016b) also describe emission from an extended thick disc, an observation highly dependent on the assumed spatial template. The more robust observation of positron annihilation in the Galactic bulge is the focus of this work, and historically the high surface brightness of positron annihilation gamma rays in this region and the high absolute positron annihilation rate – ∼2 × 1043 e+ s−1 – have been difficult to explain. This is because most putative positrons sources are concentrated in regions of star formation in the Galactic disc (Prantzos et al. 2011; Ramaty, Kozlovsky & Lingenfelter 1979), and those associated with the older stellar population of the Galactic bulge have positron yields that are currently not well constrained, such as microquasars (Siegert et al. 2016a). Others employ exotic physics such as the de-excitation or annihilation of dark matter (e.g. Finkbeiner & Weiner 2007; Bœhm 2009). The spectrum of the positron annihilation radiation observed by INTEGRAL implies that ∼ 100 per cent of positrons annihilate via interactions with neutral hydrogen (charge exchange, see Guessoum, Jean & Gillard 2005, for an overview). Moreover, constraints show positrons are injected into the interstellar medium (ISM) at low energies (≤∼3 − 7 MeV, Aharonian & Atoyan 1981; Beacom & Yüksel 2006). This likely rules out compact sources such as pulsars and millisecond pulsars as the origin of the annihilating positrons as such sources inject positrons into the ISM at energies greater than a few GeV. The observed spectrum of positron annihilation in the Galaxy is best explained with annihilation of positrons with initial energies w0 ≤ a few MeV in a single phase ISM with a temperature of ∼104 K and a degree of ionization of a few × 10−2 (Churazov et al. 2005; Siegert et al. 2016b) or alternatively by annihilation of these ‘low energy’ positrons in a multiphase medium, where not more than ∼ 8 per cent of positrons annihilate in the very hot phase (T ≥ 106 K). Furthermore, annihilation in the hot (T ≥ 105 K) or cold (T ≤ 103 K) media cannot make a dominant contribution to the annihilation spectrum (Churazov et al. 2005; Siegert et al. 2016b) in the presence of a multiphase medium. Previous works have attempted to explain the morphology of positron annihilation gamma rays through the diffusive transport of positrons (Martin et al. 2012; Alexis et al. 2014) produced near the Galactic centre (referred to herein as ‘inside-out’ transport, e.g. Jean et al. 2009). However, such works struggle to replicate the observed morphology of the positron annihilation signal and require the presence of a highly ordered magnetic field to aid positron diffusion out into the Galactic bulge (out to radii ∼kpc). In particular, Jean et al. (2009) find that low-energy positrons are confined to scales of ∼200 pc in the presence of magnetic turbulence characterized by a Kolmogorov turbulent spectrum. Diffusive transport of positrons into the Galactic bulge region was also investigated (Prantzos 2006; Higdon, Lingenfelter & Rothschild 2009; Martin et al. 2012; Alexis et al. 2014), however the scenario presented involved positrons produced in the disc. This ‘outside-in’ transport mechanism invokes diffusion in a similar manner to the ‘inside-out’ diffusion scenario of Jean et al. (2009). The expected similarity of the diffusion coefficients in the Galactic disc and bulge environments1 suggests that diffusion in the ‘outside-in’ transport scenario can be ruled out for the same reasons presented in the ‘inside-out’ transport case. Several works have also posited that the origin of positrons is related to our Galaxy’s central supermassive black hole (SMBH) (e.g. Cheng, Chernyshov & Dogiel 2006; Totani 2006). In this scenario, positrons are produced either in the accretion disc around the SMBH or through pair production in jets. The jet can also be invoked as a transport mechanism to distribute the positrons on to the size scales of the Galactic bulge. However, this scenario implies stringent fine-tuning constraints on the time between the launching of the jet, the total jet power and the subsequent time at which positron annihilation is observed. Explaining the morphology of positron annihilation radiation in the Galaxy represents only part of the solution to the origin of Galactic positrons. In addition, one must explain the spectrum of positron annihilation gamma rays. In the above works, positrons are transported into neutral material where they subsequently annihilate. An alternative scenario was suggested, and found viable, by Churazov et al. (2011): positrons annihilate in an ISM that radiatively2 cools from ∼106 to ∼104 K on a time-scale shorter than the positron lifetime in the ISM. The annihilating positrons retain no ‘memory’ of the initial thermal conditions of the ISM. Only the ISM conditions at annihilation leave their characteristic imprint on the resulting spectrum of emitted gamma rays. The limitation of the Churazov et al. (2011) model lies in the fact that the transport of positrons is not considered: Positrons are assumed to annihilate in locations that replicate the morphology determined from INTEGRAL/SPI measurements of the positron annihilation radiation described in the same work. The influence of large scale motions of gas associated with star formation in the Milky Way’s Galactic centre have not been considered in detail with respect to resolving the origin of the Galactic bulge positrons; however, positron transport in a Galactic nuclear outflow was first posited in Dermer & Skibo (1997) in the context of observations made by OSSE/CGRO (Purcell et al. 1997). These observations revealed an extended component of positron annihilation at latitudes of up to >15°, however the observation of this feature in data from OSSE was highly model dependent (Milne et al. 2001) and the feature did not appear in subsequent analysis. In the context of explaining the highly robust observation of positron annihilation in the Galactic bulge, the plausibility of such a scenario was first raised in Crocker & Aharonian (2011), in the context of the existence of a nuclear outflow in the Milky Way. Evidence for such an outflow emerged in Bland-Hawthorn & Cohen (2003). Gamma-ray structures further suggestive of such an outflow (the ‘Fermi Bubbles’; Su, Slatyer & Finkbeiner 2010) were subsequently discovered in data from the FERMI satellite. Such an outflow would cool both radiatively and adiabatically as the gas injected at the Galactic centre expands (Crocker et al. 2015). Moreover, it is plausible that advection could transport positrons over the ∼kpc distances required to explain the spatial morphology of the positron annihilation signal. Based on the work of Jean et al. (2009), the diffusion time-scale for positrons to escape from a region with radius ∼200 pc is tdiff ∼ 40 Myr. This is calculated using the diffusion coefficient for MeV positrons with a Kolgomorov turbulent spectrum, derived in Jean et al. (2009). In comparison, the time-scale for positrons comoving with an outflow with wind velocity v ∼ 500 km s−1 (Crocker et al. 2015) to advect to 1 kpc is tadv ∼ 1 Myr, less than the diffusion time-scale of the positrons. Thus, positrons can be accurately described as ‘frozen-in’ to the plasma by magnetic turbulence, and we henceforth assume they co-move with any large-scale motions of this plasma. In this work, we consider the transport of positrons in an analytical model of this nuclear wind and investigate whether such a scenario can replicate the two key observations of the Galactic positron annihilation signal: its morphology and the gamma-ray energy spectrum. 2 METHODS 2.1 Outflow model We model one half of a nuclear outflow. The solid angle subtended by the outflow is fixed at Ω = π Str to replicate the geometry of the Fermi Bubbles (Lacki 2014), and the geometry of the outflow is that of the section of a sphere. The wind launching zone3 at the base of the outflow has an initial radius of r0 = 100 pc based on the radius of the Central Molecular Zone, the region of high star fomation intensity in the Galactic centre (Morris & Serabyn 1996). The evolution of the resulting wind can thus be described by the geometry of the outflow, and the mass flux, $$\dot{M}$$, and energy flux, $$\dot{E}$$, into the outflow. The initial temperature of the wind is set self-consistently with the mass and energy flux into the outflow following Strickland & Heckman (2009), as is the initial wind velocity at r0 i.e. $$T_0 = 2\mu m_p \dot{E}(5 k \dot{M})^{-1}$$ and $$v_0=(2\dot{E}\dot{M}^{-1})^{1/2}$$. The mass density of the plasma in the outflow evolves according to mass conservation, with the initial density given by $$\rho _0 =\dot{M}(2v_0\Omega r_0^2)^{-1}.$$ The nuclear wind will decelerate as it does work against the gravitational potential of the Galaxy. To describe the wind deceleration we use a parametrization to approximate the gravitational potential Δϕ, described by Breitschwerdt, McKenzie & Voelk (1991): \begin{eqnarray} \phi [R, z] &\simeq& 1.6 \times 10^5 - \frac{8.82\times 10^4}{\sqrt{R^2+z^2+0.245}}\nonumber \\ &&-\,\frac{1.1\times 10^6}{\sqrt{R^2+\left(\sqrt{z^2+0.70}+7.26\right)^2}}+\frac{5.81\times 10^5}{13+\sqrt{R^2+z^2}}\nonumber \\ &&+\,4.47\times 10^4\ln \left({13+\sqrt{R^2+z^2}}\right)\, \mathrm{(km\, s^{-1})^2}, \end{eqnarray} (1)where z is the height above the Galactic plane and R the Galactocentric radius, both in kpc, in cylindrical coordinates. As we assume spherical symmetry, we approximate the value of Δϕ by its value on the z-axis (i.e. where R = 0 in equation 1). In our model, we henceforth refer to the coordinate z as r, the radial distance from the Galactic centre. The wind velocity is given as a function of the radial distance from the Galactic centre r as (Crocker et al. 2015): $$v = v_0(1-\dot{M}\dot{E}^{-1}\Delta \phi [r])^{1/2}.$$ Here Δϕ[r] = ϕ[r] − ϕ[r0]. The temperature of the outflow evolves through both radiative and adiabatic cooling. The radiative cooling rate is calculated assuming the plasma is in collisional ionization equilibrium (CIE). We find that in the outflow the electron–ion collision time-scale (e.g. Lacki 2014) is always shorter than the advection time-scale for the outflows we describe, hence CIE is an accurate description of the cooling mode of the plasma. In addition to radiative cooling, the gas cools adiabatically as it expands, with an effective polytrope of γad = 5/3 for the non-relativistic plasma. The ionization state of the plasma is computed from the CIE tables of Sutherland et al. (2013). We track the evolution of the ionization fraction, and hence calculate the evolution of the neutral hydrogen number density nH, ionization fraction XH and electron density ne, as the energy losses of the positrons depend on the density of all species in the ISM. 2.2 Positron microphysics We consider the propagation of positrons with initial energies w0 < 1.4 MeV in a nuclear outflow. This upper bound on the initial energy is consistent with a source of positrons produced in β+ decay of radionuclides synthesized by stars and stellar end products like supernovae, and moreover is consistent with the constraints on the energies of positrons in the Galactic centre from Beacom & Yüksel (2006). For positrons emitted from β+ unstable radionuclides (such as 44Sc and 56Co), positrons are emitted with an energy spectrum with a mean emission energy of ∼600 keV and a maximum emission energy of ∼1.5 MeV. We calculate the energy w50 such that 50 per cent of positrons are emitted with energies w0 ≤ w50. We then calculate the mean lower and upper energy at which positrons are emitted based on our calculated w50 for positrons emitted in decay of 56Co: wlow ∼ 0.4 MeV and whigh ∼ 0.8 MeV, respectively. These values are close to those derived when considering positrons emitted from decay of 44Sc. Our analysis does not include a detailed treatment of discrete energy loss interactions between positrons and neutral hydrogen atoms, nor do we consider the annihilation of positrons ‘in-flight’ (while their kinetic energies w0 ≫ 3/2kbT). These processes become important only in the last few tens of years of the positrons Myr lifetimes when the positrons reach kinetic energies w < 100 eV. The short time-scales on which these processes become important, at the end of the positron lifetimes, allows us to consider only the continuous energy loss processes in calculating positron trajectories. Positrons interact with all components of the ISM: neutral and ionized atoms, free electrons, the magnetic field, and the radiation field. However, positrons with energies w ≪ 1 GeV lose the majority of their energy through ionization and plasma losses. Other radiative energy loss processes (synchrotron losses, bremsstrahlung with neutral and ionized atoms, and inverse Compton losses) are negligible for ∼MeV positrons (Prantzos et al. 2011). The adiabatic expansion of the plasma in which the positrons are embedded mean that the positrons lose energy through adiabatic cooling. We find that the adiabatic energy losses of the positrons tend to dominate over radiative energy loss processes, and as the adiabatic energy losses of the positrons do not depend on the opening angle of the outflow, positron trajectories are not sensitive to the specific choice of opening angle. Unlike the wind fluid, the effective polytrope for the positrons evolves with the positron energy as they transition from a relativistic to non-relativistic fluid during the energy loss process. We assume an ideal equation of state (EoS), and the adiabatic index of the positrons is given by Γ = 1 + 1/3(β2/(1 − (1 − β2)1/2)), where β = (1 − (1/(1 + η)))1/2, η = w/511 keV. In reality, the EoS is dependent on the internal energy of the positrons and hence non-ideal, however we find the impact of the non-ideal EoS compared to the ideal EoS is negligible. 2.3 Evolution of positron energy in a nuclear outflow In our model, we assume that positrons co-move with the expanding plasma, low-energy positrons are confined by magnetic turbulence in the plasma, and their motion is thus dominated by any large-scale motions the plasma may undergo. In this scenario, positrons are transported radially outward from the wind launching zone at the wind velocity v[t], embedded in an outflow that expands according to mass conservation (adiabatic expansion). Such an outflow cools as it expands. We calculate the radius at which positrons are expected to annihilate. The thermalization radius, rtherm is the maximum radius achieved by a positron comoving with the outflow as it loses kinetic energy from w = w0 to wtherm = 6.8 eV, corresponding to thermalization in an ISM with T ∼ 104 K. We choose this characteristic temperature as positrons annihilating in a plasma with this temperature will reproduce the measured linewidth of the positron annihilation line, however the exact choise for wtherm does not qualitatively affect our conclusions. The lifetime of positrons in the outflow depends on the density of the neutral and ionized species in the ISM. As these densities vary not only with the adiabatic expansion of the plasma but also according to the radiative cooling of the plasma, the trajectories of positrons in the outflow are calculated iteratively for a range of different initial conditions. A trajectory is parametrized by the mass and energy flux into the outflow ($$\dot{M}$$ and $$\dot{E}$$, respectively) and the initial energy of the positron w0. We calculate the evolution of positron energies for a grid where $$\dot{M}\in \lbrace 10^{-3}, 10^0\rbrace \, \mathrm{M_{\odot }\, yr^{-1}}$$ and $$\dot{E}\in \lbrace 10^{38}, 10^{40}\rbrace \, \mathrm{erg\, s^{-1}}$$ for positron energies wlow and whigh calculated above. The range of values chosen for the $$\lbrace \dot{E}, \dot{M}\rbrace$$ parameter space are conservatively broad estimates for the maximum and minimum values expected from nuclear star formation (Crocker 2012). The initial temperature, T0, and wind velocity, v, are defined by $$\dot{E}$$ and $$\dot{M}$$ as described above. The ionization fraction of hydrogen in the plasma is given by CIE (Sutherland et al. 2013), which varies as a function of temperature. Typical initial temperatures range from ∼106–107 K with outflow velocities of ∼300–1500 km s−1. The density of the medium evolves due to mass conservation in the outflow, i.e. the density at time t is \begin{equation} \rho [t] = \frac{\dot{M}}{2v[t]\Omega (r_0 + r)^2}, \end{equation} (2)where t = 0 where the flow is launched at r0 with velocity v0 and \begin{equation} r = \int _{0}^{t}v_0\left(1-\frac{\dot{M}}{\dot{E}}\Delta \phi [r]\right)^{1/2} {\rm d}t. \end{equation} (3)The temperature evolves due to adiabatic and radiative losses. The adiabatic cooling rate at time t is \begin{equation} \frac{{\rm d}T}{{\rm d}t}\Big |_\mathrm{ad}=- 2\frac{(\gamma _\mathrm{ad}-1)v[t]T_0}{(r_0+r)}\left(\frac{\rho [t]}{\rho _0}\right )^{\gamma _\mathrm{ad}-1}, \end{equation} (4)where γad = 5/3 for the non-relativistic gas. The radiative cooling rate is \begin{equation} \frac{{\rm d}T}{{\rm d}t}\Big |_\mathrm{rad} = -\frac{\Lambda }{n^2}\frac{2n_\mathrm{tot}}{3k_b}, \end{equation} (5)where Λ/n2 is the normalized cooling function from Sutherland et al. (2013) assuming CIE. The ionization state of the medium and the densities of the different species are computed from the same cooling tables. Positrons with an initial energy of w0 at r0 are evolved simultaneously. Positrons lose energy through both adiabatic and radiative loss processes. As the adiabatic losses of the positrons dominate, and continuous radiative losses with species other than hydrogen in the ISM (helium and metals) are subdominant, we assume positrons interact only with hydrogen and free electrons. The adiabatic energy loss rate for positrons at time t is \begin{equation} \frac{{\rm d}w}{{\rm d}t}\Big |_\mathrm{ad}=- 2\frac{(\Gamma -1)v[t]w_0}{(r_0+r)}\left(\frac{\rho [t]}{\rho _0}\right )^{\Gamma -1}. \end{equation} (6)We find that the adiabatic energy losses of the positrons always dominate over the radiative energy losses. Positrons also lose energy through ionization and Coulomb losses. Ionization losses due to interactions with neutral hydrogen are given by (Ginzburg 1979): \begin{eqnarray} \frac{{\rm d}w}{{\rm d}t}\Big |_{\mathrm{ion}} = -7.7\times 10^{-9}\frac{n_{{\rm H}}}{\beta }\left[ \ln \left(\frac{(\gamma -1)\gamma ^2\beta ^2 (511\, \mathrm{keV})^2}{2I^2}\right)+\frac{1}{8}\right]\, \mathrm{eV\, s^{-1}},\nonumber \\ \end{eqnarray} (7)where nH is the number density of neutral hydrogen, I = 13.8 eV is the ionization energy of hydrogen, and γ is the Lorentz factor for a positron with kinetic energy w. The energy loss rate due to coulomb scattering from the ionized ISM component are given by (Huba 2013) \begin{eqnarray} \frac{{\rm d}w}{{\rm d}t}\Big |_{\mathrm{pla}} &=& -1.7\times 10^{-8}\frac{n_{\rm e}}{\beta }\ln {\Lambda _\mathrm{C}}\int _0^{w/k_bT} {\rm d}x x^{1/2}{\rm e}^{-x}\nonumber \\ &&-\,(w/k_bT)^{1/2}{\rm e}^{-w/k_bT}) \, \mathrm{eV\, s^{-1}}, \end{eqnarray} (8)where $$\Lambda _\mathrm{C} = (k_bT/4\pi n_{\rm e} {\rm e}^2)^{1/2}(\mathrm{max}(2{\rm e}^2/mu^2, \hbar /mu))^{-1}$$ and u = (3E/m)1/2 − (8kbT/πm)1/2 cm s − 1. with ne the electron density, m is the electron mass and e the electron charge. Trajectories of positrons are calculated and recorded until they either (i) reach a maximum radius of 8 kpc or (ii) thermalize. In the latter case, we consider positrons thermalized if they reach an energy of 6.8 keV. This positron energy is consistent with an ISM temperature of ∼104 K. The ISM conditions (temperature, density and ionization fraction) at thermalization are recorded, as its thermalization radius, rtherm. We then consider the regions of our input parameter space occupied by positrons that thermalize 3 RESULTS For our model to replicate observations of positron annihilation in the Galactic bulge, the following must be satisfied: First, the spatial distribution of annihilating positrons must be consistent with the model described by Siegert et al. (2016b), and secondly, 90 per cent of positrons must annihilate in an ISM that has cooled to ∼104 K. To assist in comparing our results to the best-fitting morphology of the positron annihilation signal described by Siegert et al. (2016b), we transform their two-dimensional intensity map into a one-dimensional radial intensity profile. The best-fitting Bulge profile from Siegert et al. (2016b) is the superposition of two two-dimensional Gaussian distributions representing a spatially narrow component of emission associated with the Galactic bulge, and a spatially broad component of emission associated with the same region. We calculate a mean inner radius and a mean outer radius to characterize the observed profile, i.e. \begin{equation} r_\mathrm{in} = \frac{\int \limits _{0}^{r_\mathrm{50}}{\rm d}r I[r]r^2}{\int \limits _{0}^{r_\mathrm{50}} {\rm d}rI[r]r} \sim 360\, \mathrm{pc},\, r_\mathrm{out} = \frac{\int \limits _{r_\mathrm{50}}^{\infty }{\rm d}r I[r]r^2}{\int \limits _{r_\mathrm{50}}^{\infty } {\rm d}rI[r]r} \sim 1.6\, \mathrm{kpc}, \end{equation} (9)where r50 is the root of the equation $$\int ^{r_\mathrm{50}}_{0}{\rm d}r I[r]r/\int ^{\infty }_{0}{\rm d}r I[r]r = 0.5$$ – radius inside which 50 per cent of the 511 keV flux I[r] is observed. We choose to proceed with the analysis in this way – as opposed to calculating radial intensity profiles from our model – both to simplify the subsequent analysis and to take into account that the distribution of the positron annihilation radiation described in Siegert et al. (2016b) is a best-fitting model, and the smooth nature of the profile is a property of the model, not necessarily the positron annihilation signal itself. The deceleration of the wind due to the gravitational potential of the Galaxy allows us to introduce a further constraint on the scenario we present. If the wind stalls before reaching rout, it is not possible for positrons to be transported to radii consistent with the observed intensity profile of the radiation. We calculate the regions of parameter space excluded by this constraint, which is plotted as the black solid line in Fig. 1. Figure 1. View largeDownload slide Contour showing regions of parameter space where w0 ∼ 0.8 MeV positrons thermalize at rtherm[whigh] ∼ rout (blue shaded region, dot–dashed contours) and where the outflow has cooled to 104 K at rout (blue shaded region, solid contours). Similar contours for positrons with w0 ∼ 0.4 MeV and rtherm[whigh] ∼ rin are shown in red. The black line delineates the region of the parameter space, where the outflow stalls before reaching rout, which are excluded in our model. Figure 1. View largeDownload slide Contour showing regions of parameter space where w0 ∼ 0.8 MeV positrons thermalize at rtherm[whigh] ∼ rout (blue shaded region, dot–dashed contours) and where the outflow has cooled to 104 K at rout (blue shaded region, solid contours). Similar contours for positrons with w0 ∼ 0.4 MeV and rtherm[whigh] ∼ rin are shown in red. The black line delineates the region of the parameter space, where the outflow stalls before reaching rout, which are excluded in our model. For regions of the parameter space where the wind does not stall, we calculate rtherm for positrons with an initial kinetic energy w0 = wlow in a Galactic outflow as described in Section 2, and compare this radius to the inner characteristic radius rin. In Fig. 1, red contours show regions of the $$\lbrace \dot{E}, \dot{M}\rbrace$$ parameter space for which positrons with w0 = wlow thermalize at rin (i.e. where 0.9 < rtherm/rin < 1.1). Overplotted, also in red, are the regions of parameter space for which the outflow cools to 8000 ≤ rtherm[w0 = wlow] ≤ 3 × 104 K at the radius at which positrons thermalize. It is immediately obvious that these two sets of contours are disjoint, and thus there is no region of parameter space where positrons with initial energies ∼wlow can annihilate, where the ISM temperature is consistent with the observations. The solid (dot–dashed) blue contours show where positrons with initial kinetic energies w0 = whigh thermalize when the ISM has cooled to 8000 ≤rtherm[w0 = wlow] ≤ 3 × 104 K (where positrons thermalize at 0.9 < rtherm/rin < 1.1). There are regions of the parameter space where positrons with initial energies ∼whigh annihilate in an ISM that has cooled to ∼104 K. However, for the scenario to be presented to be consistent with observations, less than ten percent of positrons must annihilate in the hot medium. In the scenario described, the low-energy positrons (∼50 per cent of positrons in the outflow) annihilate before the ISM has cooled to 104 K. In Fig. 1, one can see there is no single point in the $$\lbrace \dot{E}, \dot{M}\rbrace$$ parameter space where positrons at relevant eneriges annihilate in an ISM with a temperature of ∼104 K at radii consistent with the morphology of the observed extent of the 511 keV line. In the scenario we present, there is no region in which positrons with energies ∼wlow annihilate in a medium that has cooled to 104 K. Consequently, the spectra of positron annihilation will be considerably broader than the observed spectrum (Guessoum et al. 2005) for all regions of the parameter space, even those in which positrons with energies w0 = whigh thermalize and annihilate once the ISM has cooled to ∼104 K, as the broadest component of the spectrum dominates the total observed spectrum. Based on these results, we rule out a scenario where positrons are advected into the Galactic bulge by a steady state nuclear outflow as the source of Galactic bulge positrons. Our results show no sensitivity to the choice of opening angle of the described outflow. We find that the spectrum of gamma rays resulting from positron annihilation provides a stringent constraint on the annihilation sites of positrons, and our model cannot successfully reproduce the global Galactic bulge positron annihilation spectrum observed by SPI/INTEGRAL (Siegert et al. 2016b). 4 CONCLUSION In this work, we find that positron transport in an adiabatically expanding and adiabatically and radiatively cooling steady-state outflow cannot consistently replicate either the observed morphology or the spectrum of positron annihilation gamma-rays. In particular, constraints on the observed spectrum of the positron annihilation radiation rule out the scenario we propose. In ruling out this scenario, where positrons are transported by large-scale motions of gas from the Galactic nucleus to the Galactic bulge, we provide evidence in favour of searching for a source of Galactic positrons that is distributed in the Bulge region of the Galaxy, although we do not rule out large scale diffusive transport. A distributed source such as subtypes of thermonuclear supernovae associated with old stellar populations (Crocker et al. 2017) or microquasars (Siegert et al. 2016a) can plausibly explain the observed morphology of the positron annihilation signal without invoking complex, large-scale transport of positrons via diffusion. Acknowledgements Parts of this research were conducted by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO), through project number CE110001020. IRS is supported by the Australian Research Council grant FT160100028. FHP thanks Ralph Sutherland, Geoffrey Bicknell, Dipanjan Mukherjee, Roland Diehl, Thomas Siegert, Felix Aharonian, and Eugene Churazov for useful discussions. RMC thanks Geoffrey Bicknell for the calculation of the wind deceleration. Footnotes 1 D = 9.8 × 10−4 kpc2 Myr−1 for ∼MeV positrons in Jean et al. (2009) for the Galactic bulge, as opposed to 4.1 × 10−4 kpc2 Myr−1 derived in Maurin et al. (2001) for the Galactic disc. 2 It was noted in this work that adiabatic cooling of the ISM could be important to consider. 3 The wind will initially accelerate, however we find that for our chosen parameter space there is no further acceleration beyond ∼100 pc. REFERENCES Aharonian F. A., Atoyan A. M., 1981, Pisma v Astron. Zh. , 7, 714 Alexis A., Jean P., Martin P., Ferrière K., 2014, A&A , 564, A108 CrossRef Search ADS Beacom J. F., Yüksel H., 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 97, 071102 CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Bland-Hawthorn J., Cohen M., 2003, ApJ , 582, 246 CrossRef Search ADS Breitschwerdt D., McKenzie J. F., Voelk H. J., 1991, A&A , 245, 79 Bœhm C., 2009, New J. Phys. , 11, 105009 CrossRef Search ADS Cheng K. S., Chernyshov D. O., Dogiel V. A., 2006, ApJ , 645, 1138 CrossRef Search ADS Churazov E., Sunyaev R., Sazonov S., Revnivtsev M., Varshalovich D., 2005, MNRAS , 357, 1377 CrossRef Search ADS Churazov E., Sazonov S., Tsygankov S., Sunyaev R., Varshalovich D., 2011, MNRAS , 411, 1727 CrossRef Search ADS Crocker R. M., 2012, MNRAS , 423, 3512 CrossRef Search ADS Crocker R. M., Aharonian F., 2011, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 106, 101102 CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Crocker R. M., Bicknell G. V., Taylor A. M., Carretti E., 2015, ApJ , 808, 107 CrossRef Search ADS Crocker R. M. et al. , 2017, 1, 0135 Dermer C. D., Skibo J. G., 1997, ApJ , 487, L57 CrossRef Search ADS Finkbeiner D. P., Weiner N., 2007, Phys. Rev. D , 76, 083519 CrossRef Search ADS Ginzburg V. L., 1979, Theor. Phys. Astrophys . Guessoum N., Jean P., Gillard W., 2005, A&A , 436, 171 CrossRef Search ADS Higdon J. C., Lingenfelter R. E., Rothschild R. E., 2009, ApJ , 698, 350 CrossRef Search ADS Huba J. D., 2013, NRL PLASMA FORMULARY Supported by The Office of Naval Research . Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC. Available at: http://wwwppd.nrl.navy.mil/nrlformulary/ Jean P., Gillard W., Marcowith A., Ferrière K., 2009, A&A , 508, 1099 CrossRef Search ADS Johnson III W. N., Harnden F. R., Jr, Haymes R. C., 1972, ApJ , 172, L1 CrossRef Search ADS Knödlseder J. et al. , 2005, A&A , 441, 513 CrossRef Search ADS Lacki B. C., 2014, MNRAS , 444, L39 CrossRef Search ADS Martin P., Strong A. W., Jean P., Alexis A., Diehl R., 2012, A&A , 543, A3 CrossRef Search ADS Maurin D., Donato F., Taillet R., Salati P., 2001, ApJ , 555, 585 CrossRef Search ADS Milne P. A., Kurfess J. D., Kinzer R. L., Leising M. D., 2001, in Ritz S., Gehrels N., Shrader C. R., eds, AIPhysics Conf. Proc. Vol. 587, Gamma 2001: Gamma-Ray Astrophysics. Am. Inst. Phys., New York , p 11 Morris M., Serabyn E., 1996, ARA&A , 34, 645 CrossRef Search ADS Prantzos N., 2006, A&A , 449, 869 CrossRef Search ADS Prantzos N. et al. , 2011, Rev. Mod. Phys. , 83, 1001 CrossRef Search ADS Purcell W. R. et al. , 1997, ApJ , 491, 725 CrossRef Search ADS Ramaty R., Kozlovsky B., Lingenfelter R. E., 1979, ApJS , 40, 487 CrossRef Search ADS Siegert T. et al. , 2016a, Nature , 531, 341 CrossRef Search ADS Siegert T., Diehl R., Khachatryan G., Krause M. G. H., Guglielmetti F., Greiner J., Strong A. W., Zhang X., 2016b, A&A , 586, A84 CrossRef Search ADS Strickland D. K., Heckman T. M., 2009, ApJ , 697, 2030 CrossRef Search ADS Su M., Slatyer T. R., Finkbeiner D. P., 2010, ApJ , 724, 1044 CrossRef Search ADS Sutherland R., Dopita M., Binette L., Groves B., 2013, Astrophysics Source Code Library , record ascl:1306.008 Totani T., 2006, PASJ , 58, 965 CrossRef Search ADS Weidenspointner G. et al. , 2008, Nature , 451, 159 CrossRef Search ADS PubMed © 2017 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters – Oxford University Press

**Published: ** Feb 1, 2018

Loading...

personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly

**discover** and **read** the research

that matters to you.

Enjoy **affordable access** to

over 18 million articles from more than

**15,000 peer-reviewed journals**.

All for just $49/month

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from *SpringerNature*, *Elsevier*, *Wiley-Blackwell*, *Oxford University Press* and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

## “Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”

Daniel C.

## “Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”

@Phil_Robichaud

## “I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”

@deepthiw

## “My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”

@JoseServera

DeepDyve ## Freelancer | DeepDyve ## Pro | |
---|---|---|

Price | FREE | $49/month |

Save searches from | ||

Create lists to | ||

Export lists, citations | ||

Read DeepDyve articles | Abstract access only | Unlimited access to over |

20 pages / month | ||

PDF Discount | 20% off | |

Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.

System error. Please try again!

or

By signing up, you agree to DeepDyve’s Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Already have an account? Log in

Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.

To save an article, **log in** first, or **sign up** for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.

All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.

ok to continue