Abstract Introduction For a drug that has been omnipresent for nearly 200 years, nitrous oxide’s (N2O) future seems less certain than its illustrious past. Environmental concerns are coming to the fore and may yet outweigh important clinical benefits. Sources of data After determining the scope of the review, the authors used PubMed with select phrases encompassing the words in the scope. Both preclinical and clinical reports were considered. Areas of agreement The analgesic and anaesthetic advantages of N2O remain despite a plethora of newer agents Areas of controversy N2O greenhouse gas effect and its inhibition of key enzymes involved in protein and DNA synthesis have provided further fuel for those intent on eliminating its further clinical use. Growing points The use of N2O for treatment-resistant depression has gained traction. Areas timely for developing research Comparative studies for N2O role in combatting the prescription opioid analgesic epidemic may well provide further clinical impetus. Introduction and history In 1772, Joseph Priestley, an English Chemist, discovered nitrous oxide (N2O) referring to it as phlogisticated nitrous air in his book ‘Experiments and Observations on Different kinds of Air’ that was published in 1775. A significant advance was provided by the famous Scottish engineer, James Watt, who designed a delivery device which was described in a 1794 book that he co-authored with Thomas Beddoes entitled ‘Considerations on the Medical Use and on the Production of Factitious Airs.’ The term ‘factitious’ refers to the fact that N2O needs to be synthesized experimentally as it does not exist naturally. Beddoes established the Pneumatic Institution for Relieving Diseases by Medical Airs in 1798 in Bristol and hired Humphrey Davy, then a 19-year-old chemist from Cornwall, to supervise ongoing experiments that included N2O. Davy reported on these experiments in his vast tome entitled ‘Researches, Chemical and Philosophical, chiefly concerning Nitrous Oxide, or Dephlogisticated nitrous air, and its Respiration’ published in 1800. Davy commented on N2O’s possible utility for alleviating pain during surgery as follows ‘As nitrous oxide in its extensive operation appears capable of destroying pain, it may probably be used with advantage during surgical operations in which no great effusion of blood takes place.’ Davy left Bristol to take up a prestigious post at the Royal Institution in London where he lectured extensively on N2O and went on to discover three elements, sodium, chlorine and iodine as well as the arc lamp which was a precursor to the Davy Lamp that was used in the coal mines. The first demonstration of the medical use of N2O was provided by Gardner Qincy Colton for a tooth extraction performed on the dentist Horace Wells, in Hartford Connecticut in 1844. So impressed was Wells that he immediately began to use N2O on his patients. A subsequent public demonstration in Boston by Wells in the next month was regarded as a failure because the medical student ‘volunteer’ cried out in pain when his tooth was extracted. In the following year, Morton’s public demonstration of ether1 eclipsed N2O’s surgical use because of superior potency, ease of transporting the liquid ether and because ether was already being produced in industrial quantities for other applications. After the 1870s N2O found its place as a staple for dental anaesthesia and in the 1930s it replaced chloroform as the drug of choice for labour analgesia. Over the ensuing years N2O’s popularity has waxed and waned reaching its nadir in the last two decades when new hospitals that were built in Europe no longer installed hospital-wide pipes for easy access to N2O. Despite this mandate a task force convened by the European Society of Anaesthesia opined that there was still a role for the gas in anaesthetic practice.2 Physical properties While using N2O as an ‘inert’ gas with which to measure cerebral blood flow, Kety et al. needed to resolve the blood:brain solubility coefficient.3 The Bunsen solubility coefficients for N2O in blood:gas and brain:gas were determined to be 0.412 and 0.437, respectively, in humans.3 Thus, the brain:blood partition coefficient (the ratio of N2O dissolved per gram of brain to that dissolved in 1 ml of blood) was calculated to be 1.06. N2O’s low solubility in tissues promotes rapid elimination and hence recovery.4,5 N2O’s favourable pharmacokinetic profile also benefits uptake; the time required for the ratio of end-expired to inspired concentrations to approximate 1.0 during inhalation of 40% N2O was ~10 min. Molecular actions of N2O N2O’s effects are largely confined to postsynaptic targets where it blocks both the NMDA subtype6 as well as the AMPA-Kainate subtype of the glutamate receptor.7 The behavioural properties of N2O are likely to be produced by antagonism of the NMDA receptor subtype.8 To some extent the analgesic mechanisms may also involve inhibition of the T-type calcium channels.9 Clinical applications As an anaesthetic gas, N2O has many unique properties that have historically been used to great benefit in the operating room. These include a high FA/FI ratio allowing for rapid onset and offset, anxiolytic as well as analgesic and amnestic properties, lack of an odour and lack of irritation to the tracheobronchial tree. These same properties have made it increasingly popular in areas outside of the OR including paediatric procedural sedation, the emergency room, obstetrics, and potentially psychiatry, for attenuation of treatment-resistant depression. The operating room Traditionally, N2O has served a very specific and important role in the administration of general anaesthesia. Before the development of low-solubility volatile anaesthetics, specifically sevoflurane and desflurane, the second gas effect property of N2O allowed for a more rapid onset and emergence from general anaesthesia.10,11 Although the second gas effect is still applicable to sevoflurane and desflurane, its clinical impact is less important.12 More recently, the ENIGMA randomized clinical trial brought into question whether N2O was safe to use as part of a general anaesthetic.13 The trial found that N2O increases the risk of post-operative cardiac events (but not mortality); however, the study was not powered to detect such events. The ENIGMA II randomized clinical trial, which was specifically designed to detect increased risk of cardiovascular events or death in patients receiving N2O, refuted the earlier ENIGMA findings.14 The authors found no correlation between N2O and adverse cardiac events in high-risk patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. They did, however, find a statistically significant increase in postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in those receiving N2O; the increased risk was not apparent when prophylactic antiemetics were administered prior to the end of the surgery.15 A meta-analysis revealed that the increase in the risk for PONV with N2O is time-dependent with a relatively low risk if exposure is <1 h.16 While the use of N2O should not be limited because of concern for cardiac complications, the risk of PONV is certainly increased. N2O may continue to serve a (more limited) role as part of a balanced anaesthetic regimen. An important product of supplementation of a general anaesthetic with N2O is that it provides a deeper plane of anaesthesia thereby obviating the risk of awareness as was demonstrated in a thorough meta-analysis.17 Furthermore, a prospective clinical trial demonstrated that intra-operative awareness can be reduced more effectively with the addition of N2O than can be achieved with BIS monitoring.18 Unlike other volatile anaesthetics, nitrous oxide increases systemic vascular resistance (SVR) as well as plasma norepinephrine levels.19 Furthermore, when N2O is used in conjunction with other volatile anaesthetics, it decreases the amount of other volatile agents needed to obtain 1 MAC, thereby attenuating the cardiac depression and decrease in SVR caused by the potent inhalational anaesthetic agents. Additionally, N2O is neither irritating to the airway nor does it have a pungent odour which proves useful in mask inductions of paediatric and developmentally delayed patients. While the acute analgesic properties of N2O have been well-documented, it is now becoming apparent that intra-operative administration of N2O may result in a decrease in chronic post-surgical pain. In an analysis of the Hong Kong sub-population of patients (n = 640) that were enrolled into the original ENIGMA trial, ~10% of patients had new-onset severe pain lasting at least 3 months after surgery; patients randomized to receive N20 were significantly less likely to experience chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP).20 In a 12-month follow-up to the ENIGMA II trial, more than 12% of patients reported presence of pain at the surgical site14 although exposure to N2O did not reduce the risk for CPSP. However, in further planned analysis of the Asian patients from the Hong Kong sub-population of the ENIGMA II trial (n = 674) there was a significant reduction in the risk for the reporting of CPSP that was especially evident in those with homozygous variants for the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene.14 Paediatric use While use of N2O in the OR may be decreasing, its use is growing in popularity for sedation for minor procedures particularly in the paediatric population. Because N2O obviates the need for intravenous access, it is particularly appealing in this population. There have been multiple large studies examining the efficacy and safety of N2O for a variety of procedures in the paediatric population. In their large, multicenter prospective study, Annequin et al. demonstrated the efficacy and safety of a 50% nitrous oxide/50% oxygen mixture for analgesia and anxiolysis during a variety or paediatric procedures.21 Their study included 1019 patients aged 0–18 undergoing procedures including lumbar puncture, bone marrow aspiration, laceration repair, minor procedures (such as surgical dressing or venous cannulation) minor surgeries (such as foreign body extraction and abscess drainage), fracture reductions, dental caries and pulmonary endoscopy.21 Median procedural pain evaluations for children were 9 (0–30) on a 1–100 Visual Analogue Scale and 1 when evaluated by either parents or nurses on a 0–10 point numerical scale. Of the 643 children older than 6 years old who were able to self-report, 93% stated that would accept N2O analgesia again. Only minor side effects were observed in 381 (37%) of patients that included euphoria (20.1%), nausea and vomiting (3.7%), dizziness (1.6%) and deep sedation (2.1%). Other symptoms considered minor side effects were: change in visual or auditory perception, dream, paraesthesia, restlessness, and nightmare or hallucination. All side effects had disappeared within 5 min of discontinuation of the N2O. In 2006, Onody et al. demonstrated a similar safety profile during 35 828 administrations of 50% N2O in a largely paediatric population.22 Zier et al. conducted a prospective observational study of nitrous administration at concentrations up to 70% in 5779 patients on 7802 occasions in patients ages 33 days to 18 years old.23 The vast majority of patients (90.8%) received a concentration of N2O that was greater than 50%. Adverse events occurred in only 4.3% of patients and included nausea (1.6%) and vomiting (2.2%). Nine patients (0.1%) had events that could be considered potentially life-threatening all of which resolved spontaneously and did not require admission.23 Overall Zier et al. did not find that adverse events were increased with concentrations of N2O greater than 50%0.23 Adverse events were more likely, however, with administration lengths of >15 min.23 A recent prospective analysis by the Paediatric Sedation Research Consortium found that serious adverse events occurred in only 0.2% of 1634 nitrous administrations for paediatric procedural sedation which included only three episodes of airway obstruction or desaturation events.24 They confirmed the findings of Zier et al. that higher concentrations of N2O (>50%) were not associated with increased nausea or serious adverse events. Additionally, over half of these N2O administrations were performed by non-physicians including advance practice nurses and physician assistants. Taken together, these studies show that N2O in concentrations up to 70% can be administered safely to paediatric patients by trained professionals. Many smaller, randomized studies have been undertaken to examine the efficacy, superiority and safety of N2O for specific procedures including venipuncture, laceration repair, lumbar puncture, botulin injection and various imaging procedures. The overall quality of these studies is limited by their small size, but they make a case for considering N2O as the primary analgesic for many procedures in the paediatric population. Venipuncture Venipuncture for obtaining samples for laboratory analyses can be stressful procedures for paediatric patients. Seventy-percent N2O has been proven to be more effective than an emulsion mixture of the local anaesthetics lidocaine and prilocaine (EMLA) cream alone.25 Additionally, Furraya et al. and Henderson et al. showed greater analgesic efficacy of 70% N2O vs 50% for venous cannulation.26,27 When compared to oral midazolam plus EMLA cream, 50% nitrous plus EMLA cream resulted in a decrease in total procedure time, improved rate of successful IV access, and overall better experience for paediatric patients.28 Adding EMLA or intradermal lidocaine to N2O administration decreases the rate of movement or withdrawal with cannulation but does not decrease self-reported pain scores.29 Laceration repair In a randomized prospective analysis of 30 children comparing local anaesthetic with 100% oxygen administration to local anaesthetic plus 50% N2O, pain scores decreased significantly in the children receiving N2O.30 A larger study randomized 204 children to receive local infiltration alone; local infiltration and oral midazolam; local infiltration and 50% N2O; or local infiltration, oral midazolam, and 50% N2O.31 In this study, N2O significantly reduced pain scores and the addition of oral midazolam to N2O did not increase analgesic efficacy, but prolonged discharge times and increased the incidence of adverse events such as dizziness and irritability.31 These results were confirmed by Bar-Meir et al. in their study of 60 children undergoing laceration repair.32 They also found that N2O was more effective in older patients (>3 years of age). A small randomized study of 32 paediatric patients found that N2O was as effective as intravenous ketamine but with reduced recovery times.33 Lumbar puncture There are few studies that directly address the use of N2O for analgesia during lumbar puncture (LP). In large, non-randomized studies of N2O for procedural analgesia in paediatric patients a significant proportion of the patients underwent LP and pain scores were reduced by N2O overall.21,34 To date there has been only one study that specifically addresses the use of N2O for sedation during LP.35 This prospective observational study included only 39 patients of which seven received 50% N2O alone and 32 received N2O in addition to topical anaesthetic. Overall pain scores as evaluated by patients, physicians, nurses, and parents were low. More randomized studies of analgesic modalities are needed to prove the optimal analgesic regimen for lumbar puncture. Injections Patients with spastic paraplegia, often as a result of cerebral palsy, undergo frequent botulin injections to relieve spasticity. Because these injections are required frequently and in multiple injection sites, adjunctive pain control is required. In a randomized, double-blind study involving 50 paediatric patients N2O, up to 70%, was found to be superior to enteral midazolam in lowering pain scores as determined by an objective observer, parents, and nurses. Of note, there were eight adverse events reported with N2O administration which included nausea, vomiting, headache and brief desaturation below 92%; however, five of the eight parents who witnessed these events rated the overall encounter better than sedation practices that they had experienced in the past.36 In contrast, two studies evaluating the combination of EMLA cream and 50% N2O found that adequate analgesia was not universally achieved.37,38 The authors concluded that not all patients, particularly those less than five years of age (who are unable to self-administer N2O), are suitable for nitrous sedation. As was found with venipuncture, the higher the concentration of N2O the more likely that it will be an effective analgesic for botulin injection.26,27 Fracture reduction Fracture reduction is another common and very painful procedure often performed in the emergency department on paediatric patients. Hennrikus et al. found that self-administered 50% N2O alone provided inadequate pain relief in 46% of fracture reductions39; however, when N2O was combined with a haematoma block, the frequency of inadequate analgesia was reduced to just 12% and only 7% of the children would choose a different analgesic technique.40 No complications were reported in either study that included a total of 154 patients.40 When compared to a Bier block, the analgesic effects were found to have similar efficacy, although 50% N2O significantly reduced procedure length.41 A randomized trial comparing ketamine and midazolam to 50% N2O and a haematoma block found no significant difference in pain scores as both provided acceptable analgesia; however, the time to recovery was significantly different with a mean-time of only 16 min in the N2O group versus 83 min in the ketamine/midazolam arm.42 Adverse events including hypoxia and vomiting were also higher in those receiving parenteral sedation with ketamine and midazolam.42 Imaging procedures N2O has also been studied for a variety of imaging procedures. For voiding cystourethrograms, N2O may be as effective as enteral midazolam and can eliminate the need for physical restraint during catheter placement.41–43 However, N2O may prolong the time to micturition after these procedures.41 N2O has also been found to be effective at reducing pain scores, increasing physician satisfaction scores and increasing procedural success during bronchoscopy.44,45 One prospective trial found that good or excellent sedation as judged by the endoscopist was achieved by 50% N2O during gastrointestinal endoscopy.46 Emergency department Much of the experience using N2O in the emergency room has been in the paediatric population and applications to the adult population have not been studied in great detail. In an Australian study of 85 patients randomized to either local anaesthetic infiltration, local anaesthetic and oxygen, or local anaesthetic and 50% N2O for abscess drainage, N2O showed no advantage in either decreasing pain or anxiety.47 A more recent prospective non-blinded observation pilot study examined the analgesic effectiveness and staff satisfaction of analgesia provided by a portable N2O device in adult patients presenting with moderate to severe pain.48 The causes of pain were diverse including abdominal pain, dental pain, musculoskeletal pain, chest pain, traumatic pain, headache, cellulitis, burns, abscesses, and wounds.48 The authors found that patients had both clinically and statistically significant reduction in mean pain scores 20 min after N2O administration that were sustained until 60 min post-administration.48 Half of the patients received additional pain medications; however, in a post-hoc analysis the administration of additional analgesics was not found to result in lower pain scores. The authors intend to conduct a further study to determine whether adequate education of nursing staff can increase the speed at which patients receive adequate analgesia through nurse-driven N2O administration to increase overall patient satisfaction.48 Two limited studies have explored the use of N2O for reduction of anterior shoulder dislocations.49,50 The initial small study found that N2O provided similar analgesia to IV sedation; however, there was a 20% failure rate in the N2O group necessitating supplementation with intravenous sedation.49 The second small study compared N2O with intra-articular lidocaine in 31 patients and found that N2O was more effective at reducing pain scores.50 Yet, a larger randomized trial comparing fentanyl to 50% N2O reported no difference in analgesic effectiveness for relieving pain from isolated long bone fracture or main joint dislocation.51 Another small (22 patients) prospective, randomized, double-blind study compared the effectiveness of 50% N2O vs 100% oxygen for the relief of migraine pain in patients presenting to the emergency department.52 Those that received N2O had a significant reduction in pain scores immediately after treatment; however, 60% of patients required additional analgesia before discharge although this was lower than the 92% in the oxygen only group. Overall, the data for the use of N2O for procedural sedation and analgesia is less than convincing in adults and more studies are need to prove its clinical utility in this patient population. Labour analgesia N2O has been used for labour analgesia in the United Kingdom since the 1930s and the US since the 1970s. Its rapid onset and offset as well as its analgesic and anxiolytic properties make it seemingly ideal in this setting. However, two extensive reviews have yielded insufficient evidence to demonstrate effectiveness of N2O in adequately relieving labour pain.53,54 Although these reviews identified 22 studies including 12 RCTs, conclusions were limited largely due to heterogeneity in the techniques used and varied widely in the concentration and delivery method of N2O, adjunctive pain medications (including inhaled potent volatile anaesthetics that are no longer commonly used), and tools and timing of assessment of pain relief.53 Likis et al. assessed nine studies that addressed maternal satisfaction with their birth experience and labour pain management as an endpoint of the effectiveness of N2O.53 Of these only two were adjudged fair55 or good56 quality and the authors concluded that the non-uniformity of the measurements of satisfaction made an accurate assessment impossible. Included in this review was Leong et al.’s 2000 study of 123 women who were offered epidural analgesia in early labour.56 Over half (n = 68) declined epidural analgesia and thus received ‘usual’ care that included scheduled meperidine and self-administered 50% N2O. Maternal satisfaction was assessed on post-partum day 1 and a greater percentage of those who received epidural analgesia (69%) were satisfied and would repeat the same analgesic option versus 36% in the N2O/meperidine group. In Waldenstrom et al.’s 1999 study, a detailed survey was undertaken in women 2 months after delivery55 in which both medical and psychological factors that could have contributed to an overall positive or negative birth experience were explored. N2O was found to be an independent predictor of a less positive birth experience; however, of the women who delivered with N2O over 25% of these reported a positive experience. Importantly, they also found that perception of involvement or control in the birthing process was the strongest psychologic predictor of a positive birth experience followed by midwife support. Pain and anxiety played a role but to a lesser degree than support and individual control. Although the analgesic effectiveness of N2O is variable and inferior to that of epidural analgesia, there is a subset of patients who are both satisfied with their overall birth experience and would choose N2O analgesia again. These studies also provide evidence that effective analgesia alone may not be the most important predictor of a positive birth experience, conclusions that were also reported in Hodnett’s systematic review which found that personal expectations, the amount of support from caregivers, the quality of the caregiver–patient relationship, and involvement in decision-making were the most important determinants of overall satisfaction with the birth experience.57 To further assess the relationship between effective analgesia and overall satisfaction, Richardson et al. conducted a large retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data to assess pain relief and overall satisfaction with labour analgesia in 6507 post-partum women using a standardized survey administered on post-partum Day 1 to compare analgesic effectiveness and overall analgesic satisfaction among women who delivered vaginally using nitrous oxide, neuraxial analgesia or both (neuraxial after N2O).58 Overall reports of analgesic effectiveness and satisfaction with epidural analgesia alone and after a trial of N2O were consistently high. Amongst the 753 (11.2%) patients who ultimately delivered with N2O alone there was far greater variability of reported analgesic effectiveness. Fifty-two percent rated analgesic effectiveness as high, 27% as moderate and 21% as low effectiveness. Despite the small effect size, overall satisfaction with nitrous oxide analgesia was high with 93% reporting they were highly satisfied with their anaesthetic care and only 1% reported a low satisfaction level. Furthermore, of those who reported poor to moderate analgesic effectiveness by any modality, the parturients who received N2O alone were more likely to report high overall satisfaction than those who received neuraxial analgesia. In conclusion, although the overall analgesic effectiveness of N2O is quite variable, analgesia may not be the most important factor in overall maternal satisfaction and there is likely a small subset of parturients who benefit significantly from N2O administration during labour. Factors predicting the responsive subset have yet to be elucidated. Depression N2O has also recently shown promise in alleviating the symptoms of treatment-resistant depression (TRD). TRD is a severe form of depression that has failed two or more adequate treatment trials. As early as 1990, NMDA receptor antagonists showed efficacy in mouse models as potential antidepressants.59 In parallel, a large body of work has defined the role of NMDA receptors in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder.60 The first RCT of ketamine, another NMDA receptor (NMDAR) antagonist,61 for the treatment of depression was undertaken in 2000. Although the study included only seven patients, antidepressant effects were immediate (within 60 min) and dramatic (lasting for up to three days).61 Limited evidence (due to low quality of the studies) of its efficacy has been demonstrated in a recent Cochrane Review62 and meta-analysis.63 Although the molecular effect of N2O differs somewhat from ketamine, the evidence of the efficacy of ketamine in treating depression and the increasing evidence for the role of the NMDAR in depression prompted a small proof of concept trial by Nagele and colleagues.64 This blinded, placebo-controlled crossover trial included 20 patients with TRD. Patients underwent two treatment sessions 1 week apart with either 50% N2O/50% oxygen or placebo: 50% nitrogen/50% oxygen. Patients showed significant decrease in their depressive symptoms at 2 and 24 h after N2O treatment. Interestingly, a majority of the patients treated with N2O continued to report a decrease in their symptoms which confounded the crossover study design. Overall, 70% of patients reported improvement after N2O treatment and only 35% reported improvement after placebo. Additionally, 20% of those that received N2O showed treatment response and 15% showed remission (defined as complete resolution of depressive symptoms). N2O overall was also well-tolerated in these depressed patients. This limited phase II clinical trial showed dramatic effects on patients with TRD; however, subsequent studies are required to determine optimal dosing to treat depression and avoid side effects and study this treatment on a broader population of patients with TRD. Side effects Mutagenicity/occupational hazard N2O is utilized in a variety of clinical settings and its possible effect on precipitating genetic abnormalities has been a widespread concern. N2O decreases methionine synthase function, which plays critical roles in folate metabolism and DNA methylation. It may, therefore, lead to damage to existing DNA and/or inhibit proper DNA synthesis.65–67 In a small study involving 91 patients undergoing colorectal surgery, it was found that patients randomized to receive 70% N2O in oxygen had an increase in quantifiable DNA damage in leucocytes using a comet tail assay.68 This, in turn, led the study’s authors to suggest that N2O would be associated with decreased wound healing after surgery. Further, it was suggested by Hogan that N2O, in clinically relevant doses, was a potent human genotoxin.69 In addition, another study involving 52 patients demonstrated that the use of N2O may have led to a delay in repair of genotoxic damage when combined with sevoflurane.70 Several other studies have shown a trivial amount of DNA damage after exposure to N2O and other anaesthetic gases, but did not evaluate whether these resulted in clinically meaningful effects.71,72 Though no single study has been conclusive regarding N2O’s potential genotoxic, mutagenic, or carcinogenic potential, it is considered an occupational hazard. Prior to routine use of waste gas scavenging systems, concentrations of N2O in operating rooms and dental suites were between 1000 and 2000 ppm.73–75 A small study evaluating operating room nurses exposed to anaesthetic waste gases that included N2O without active waste gas scavenging systems showed that they had increased DNA damage.72 A retrospective study revealed that dental assistants exposed to unscavenged occupational N2O had reduced fertility rates compared to non-exposed assistants.76 In addition, there was an increased risk of spontaneous abortion in subjects with similar environments with unscavenged exposure.77 Interestingly, and as expected, these effects did not occur in a properly scavenged environment, which suggests these potential reproductive health risks are attenuated, or eliminated, with modern scavenging systems. The acknowledgement that N2O may contribute to potential problems has led to the advent of occupational exposure limits (OELs). In the United States, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, a division of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, recommends an OEL of 25 ppm, which is lower than most other recommendations.78 In the United Kingdom, the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations set forth by the Health Services Advisory Committee, limits the OEL of N2O to 100 ppm.79 Despite concerns about design flaws, introduction of bias, or sample size in most studies, the weight of evidence of N2O’s association with potential health risks cannot be ignored, although proper waste gas scavenging systems and limiting occupational exposure to less than stated OELs likely eliminates this risk. Greenhouse gas emissions According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, N2O accounts for ~6% of all human-derived U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. This amount is of growing concern, as N2O is now recognized as one of the most environmentally damaging gases in the atmosphere. N2O produced at the surface is relatively inert until it reaches the middle stratosphere and undergoes photolysis and other chemical reactions that use free oxygen. N2O+hv→N2+O(1D)N2O+O(1D)→N2+O2N2O+O(1D)→2NO The reformed NO contributes to damage to the ozone layer.80,81 In addition to its destructive nature on the ozone layer, N2O traps heat 300 times more effectively then carbon dioxide, even though it makes up a much smaller percentage of all atmospheric gases. N2O may last up to 150 years in the atmosphere and has a global warming potential of 298, potentially 12 times higher than methane.82 Globally, 40% of N2O emissions are attributed to human activities, with the largest source originating from the agricultural sector. Agricultural sources include the use of fertilizers and manures, soil leaching and runoff, and solid waste of domesticated animals, mainly cattle. Fossil fuel combustion for sources of mobile and stationary energy is another significant source of human nitrous oxide emissions. Finally, industrial sources of N2O emissions include production of adipic acid and nitric acid, ingredients in manufacturing plastics and fertilizers, respectively. Together, these sources make up 98% of man-made nitrous oxide emissions.82,83 Apart from being released into the atmosphere by human activities, N2O is also emitted by natural processes. In fact, the majority of N2O emitted into the atmosphere is derived from these processes. Soils under natural vegetation allow certain microbes to decompose vegetative matter that accounts for more than 60% of these natural processes. In addition, N2O-producing microbes living in ocean water account for another 35% of natural N2O emissions.82,83 Unfortunately, N2O’s ozone-depletion potential is comparable to several of the hydrochloroflurocarbons, which are set to be phased out of use by 2030. The Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer is an international treaty involving 197 countries, and focuses on ozone-depleting substances that contain either chlorine or bromine. It does not include N2O.84–86 This would leave N2O as one of the most important threats to the ozone layer. Addiction potential Although N2O is clinically used as a safe anaesthetic, it is a commonly abused drug in the United States and the United Kingdom, especially amongst adolescents.87,88 In fact, N2O is the second most commonly used recreational substance in the UK after cannabis, according to a recent international survey.89 Desired effects include euphoria, anxiolysis, hallucinations, and confusion. Common practice amongst N2O abusers include inhaling gas from balloons filled by tanks supplied to industrial or clinical use and inhaling released gas directly from whipped cream dispensers. Although the exact mechanism for its addictive potential has not been fully elucidated, it likely stems from nitrous oxide’s supraspinal effects to induce analgesia via downstream opioidergic neurons through the release of enkephalins.80 In addition to activation of noradrenergic neurons via enkephalins, nitrous oxide may also activate mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons, causing a reinforcement pathway that may lead to further abuse.90,91 It is well documented that longer-term side effects from N2O abuse include impaired memory and cognition, peripheral numbness, weakness and eventually, peripheral neuropathy and megaloblastic anaemia.80,92 The latter effects stem from N2O’s ability to inactivate vitamin B12, leading to a functional vitamin B12 deficiency with long-term use. In addition, fatal accidents have been reported with recreational use, attributed to hypoxia and asphyxia.87,88 Homocysteine It is well-known that the use of N2O is associated with elevated levels of homocysteine. This effect occurs because N2O indirectly inhibits methionine synthase, a key enzyme in the metabolism of homocysteine. Nitrous oxide oxidizes cobalt I (Co+) to Co3+, which then leads to the formation of Co2+: Co++N2O+2H+→Co3++N2+2Co2+Co3++Co+→2Co2+(or) Co++N2O+H+→Co3++N2+OH− The oxidized cobalt cation prevents cobalamin from acting as a coenzyme for methionine synthase, which in turn, leads to increased homocysteine levels.93 Adequate methionine synthase function is required for proper synthesis of DNA, RNA, myelin and catecholamines. Because methionine synthase plays a crucial role in cellular function, aberrations of its function can result in genetic and protein dysfunction. It has been demonstrated that certain populations may be more susceptible to methionine synthase dysfunction, leading to elevated homocysteine levels. Patients with pre-existing vitamin B12 deficiency, pernicious anaemia, chronic alcoholism or malnourishment may be particularly affected. In addition, a certain subset of the population exhibits polymorphisms of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene, leading to reduced enzyme activity. This enzyme reduces 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate to 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, a key product that is required to convert homocysteine to methionine. Patients with homozygous mutations in the MTHFR gene present with elevated homocysteine levels and homocystinuria.94 Cardiovascular system and N2O We will first reflect on the physiologic changes that N2O produces in the cardiovascular system and thereafter consider whether cardiovascular morbidity is more likely to occur when N2O is added to an anaesthetic regimen in patients, both with and without underlying cardiovascular disease. In a small study involving 20 coronary artery bypass graft surgical patients under neurolept anaesthesia, the cardiovascular parameters and circulating catecholamines were measured just prior to cardiopulmonary bypass in a cohort that was administered either 66% N2O or air.95 Both mean arterial pressure and cardiac output decreased during N2O exposure compared to the group that received air.95 Baroreflex sensitivity (cardiovascular responses to phenylephrine and nicardipine) was compared in groups (n = 13) of ASA I–II patients that were administered equi-anaesthetic concentrations of either N2O, xenon or isoflurane.96 N2O had similar sensitivity to isoflurane while xenon blunted the responsiveness. One hundred patients were administered epinephrine and lidocaine while undergoing transphenoidal hypophysectomy during isoflurane anaesthesia ±60% N2O97; isorhythmic atrioventricular dissociation occurred significantly more frequently in the patients exposed to N2O with no difference in ventricular ectopy. Cardiac output was assessed in 80 patients over the age of 60 that were anaesthetised with either isoflurane or halothane ±50% N2O; while the expected changes were observed in the presence of the volatile anaesthetic alone, it was notable that the systemic vascular resistance increased when N2O was added to halothane-anaesthetised patients resulting in a decrease in cardiac index.98 Thirty ASA I–II patients received target-controlled infusion propofol ±70% N2O99; the addition of N2O induced cardiovascular changes that were not clinically significant.99 Because homocysteine induces endothelial dysfunction and has atherogenic properties the effect of N2O on plasma homocysteine levels were monitored in 394 patients randomized to receive a general anaesthetic ±N2O; patients receiving N2O had higher homocysteine levels which became particularly elevated following prolonged anaesthetics.100 Fifty-nine surgical patients with cardiovascular disease were randomized to receive a N2O-free or N2O-containing general anaesthetic; patients that had received N2O had higher homocysteine levels and exhibited endothelial dysfunction evidenced by alterations in flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery.101 Myocardial ischaemia/infarction In a small study involving 10 patients with ischaemic heart disease, the addition of 70% N2O to 1% isoflurane exacerbated the myocardial ischaemia in three of the six patients that isoflurane alone produced.102 In a larger study involving 70 patients undergoing carotid artery surgery patients randomized to receive a N2O-free anaesthetic were not less likely to develop myocardial ischaemia (diagnosed by EKG or by TEE) than in those patients that received an anaesthetic regimen that contained up to 60% N2O.103 However, in a randomized study involving 90 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy, those patients receiving a 50% N2O added to a total intravenous anaesthetic had significantly more postoperative myocardial ischaemia than the N2O-free anaesthetic group.104 In a widely quoted study involving 47 abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery, patients randomized to receive a N2O-free isoflurane/fentanyl anaesthetic regimen had less myocardial ischaemia and required less nitroglycerin for blood pressure control than patients in whom N2O was used to supplement the general anaesthetic.105 Because of the plausibility of N2O’s ability to produce myocardial ischaemia through its effect on methionine synthase and endothelial function, Myles’ group launched the ENIGMA trial in which 2050 non-cardiac surgical patients were randomized to receive either a N2O-free or N2O-containing general anaesthetic and followed-up for a median of 3.5 years to determine the impact on survival and the occurrence of myocardial infarction or stroke. While risk of death (primary endpoint) and stroke were not influenced by exposure to N2O, there was a statistically significant (P = 0.04) increase in the adjusted odds ratio (1.59) for myocardial infarction (95% CI: 1.01–2.51). Because of this adverse outcome a follow-up study, ENIGMA II, was launched involving 7112 non-cardiac surgical patients at risk for coronary artery disease with a composite primary endpoint of death and major non-fatal cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism and stroke) at 1 year after surgery.106 In the 82% of patients in whom follow-up data were available, exposure to N2O did not increase the risk of the primary outcome, disability (Katz index of independence in activities of daily living of <8) death, myocardial infarction or stroke.107 Unlike the original ENIGMA trial the oxygen concentration was maintained the same in each intervention. Contra-indications While N2O overall has a high safety profile, there are several instances in which it is contraindicated. Closed spaces The blood: gas partition coefficient of nitrous oxide is 0.46 which is 30 times greater than that of nitrogen (0.014). Because of this, N2O will enter gas-filled spaces more than thirty times faster than nitrogen (contained in room air) can exit the space. As such, both the volume and pressure within the closed space will increase. In 1955, Hunter described cardiovascular compromise in patients with pneumothorax, pneumoperitoneum and pneumopericardium who were anaesthetised with N2O.108 Subsequently, Eger et al. found that in dogs anaesthetised with 70–80% N2O, the intestinal gas volume increased by 80–100% at 2 h and to 200% at 4 h. Intrapleural gas volumes doubled within 10 min and tripled in 30–45 min. In contrast, intrapleural and intestinal gas volumes remained constant or decreased with halothane and oxygen administration.109 Therefore, pneumothorax, bowel obstruction and pneumopericardium are considered contraindications to N2O. Extrapolating from this, emphysematous blebs may also be a contraindication to N2O as air/gas can be trapped in these spaces during the respiratory cycle.109 Similarly, inhaled nitrous oxide can increase the pressure in the middle ear.110 There has been speculation that this is particularly problematic when the eustachian tube is blocked preventing exit of this gas; however, this has not proven to be clinically significant.111 In contrast, N2O expansion into intravitreal air bubbles of sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) or perfluorpropane (C3F8) used in vitreoretinal procedures can cause blindness.112 Anaesthesia textbooks recommend that N2O should be avoided for 7–10 days after a sulphur hexafluoride bubble and at least a month after a perfluorpropane bubble; however, Fu et al. recommend at least a month for SF6 and potentially altogether avoidance of N2O in patients who have had a C3F8 vitreous bubble placed.112 This same property also means that N2O can increase the volume of a venous air embolism. As such, N2O is considered relatively contraindicated during surgeries where there is a high risk of venous air embolism (VAE). These surgeries include all surgeries in the sitting position, particularly posterior fossa surgeries, laparoscopic surgery and caesarean section. In his 1966 study, Munson found that, in rabbits, N2O anaesthesia decreases the lethal dose of intravenous air by 30% compared to halothane alone.113 Later, he showed, in dogs, that N2O significantly increases pulmonary pressures and dead space and significantly decreases cardiac output in the presence of an air embolus.114 Losasso et al. subsequently found in their prospective, randomized trial that N2O did not increase the incidence of VAE or haemodynamically significant VAE when N2O was discontinued as soon as the VAE was detected by precordial Doppler.115 Therefore, N2O can be used during surgeries with a relatively high risk of venous air as long as there is a high level of vigilance for VAE. N2O may also increase pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and mean pulmonary arterial pressures (mPAP) and is, therefore, contraindicated in patients with pulmonary hypertension. Schulte-Sasse et al. found that PVR was significantly increased in patients with pre-existing pulmonary hypertension secondary to mitral valve stenosis.116 A subsequent study in similar patients found that with a higher dose fentanyl induction, N2O did not increase PVR or mPAP and the authors postulated that the high dose opioid attenuates the catecholamine release caused by N2O.117 Although the effects on PVR may be attenuated by high dose opioids, it should most likely be avoided in patients with pre-existing pulmonary hypertension. Additionally, N2O is relatively contraindicated in patients with a predisposition to postoperative nausea and nausea and vomiting. Nausea is a well-known side-effect of N2O and this was again confirmed in the ENIGMA II trial.14 These effects may increase with the length of procedure as proposed by Peyton and Wu in their review and meta-analysis.16 Specifically they found that the risk ratio of PONV increases 20% per hour of nitrous oxide exposure beginning at 45 min after initiation.16 Conclusion For a drug that was first used clinically nearly two centuries ago, N2O has proven to be remarkably durable despite the introduction of several waves of ‘newer’ drugs from ether to xenon. Features such as low cost, rapid pharmacokinetics, ease of use and monitoring and relative safety, have secured for it a place in the armamentarium of anaesthetists the world over. Why does enthusiasm for the use of N2O persist?118 Its consistent analgesic effect reduces chronic postoperative pain thereby reducing the need for opioid analgesics in the midst of the crisis of the prescription opioid analgesic epidemic.20 Using the number needed to treat, intra-operative awareness can be more effectively prevented with N2O than with BIS monitoring!17–18 More recently, questions have arisen whether certain vulnerable populations may be at risk from a drug that has inhibits folate-dependent enzymes including methionine synthase and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase affecting ‘one-carbon’ metabolism that can influence biochemical processes from amino acid to nucleotide synthesis. Myelinopathy, remains a devastating complication albeit exceedingly rare under clinical, non-abuse, conditions. In fact it can be argued that blockade of the NMDA subtype of the NMDA receptor is more likely to result in neuroprotection than in neurotoxicity.119 In the arena of anaesthetic-induced developmental neurotoxicity (AIDN) the preclinical studies suggest an exacerbating effect of N2O although it does not have the same potential for AIDN as do the potent volatile agents.120,121 Among safety concerns are the volume-expanding potential of N2O that may cause problems in bowel surgical procedures and in the setting of pneumocephalus or when air embolisation occurs. The potential for cardiovascular-provoking complications from elevated levels of homocysteine arising from the failure to methylate this amino acid in the presence of N2O remains a concern.122 Yet neither the POISE nor the ENIGMA II demonstrated a relationship between N20 exposure and acute cardiovascular complications.107,123 N2O continues to be an effective and safe analgesic and supplement for general anaesthesia. However from a societal aspect, environmental concerns may ultimately trump the individual patient’s benefit. Conflict of interest statement The authors have no potential conflicts of interest. References 1 Haridas RP. Horace wells’ demonstration of nitrous oxide in Boston. Anesthesiology 2013; 119: 1014– 22. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 2 European Society of Anaesthesiology task force on use of nitrous oxide in clinical anaesthetic p. The current place of nitrous oxide in clinical practice: an expert opinion-based task force consensus statement of the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015; 32: 517– 20. CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 3 Kety SS, Harmel MH, Broomell HT, et al. . The solubility of nitrous oxide in blood and brain. J Biol Chem 1948; 173: 487– 96. Google Scholar PubMed 4 Jakobsson I, Heidvall M, Davidson S. The sevoflurane-sparing effect of nitrous oxide: a clinical study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999; 43: 411– 4. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 5 Peyton PJ, Chao I, Weinberg L, et al. . Nitrous oxide diffusion and the second gas effect on emergence from anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 596– 602. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 6 Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Todorovic SM, Mennerick S, et al. . Nitrous oxide (laughing gas) is an NMDA antagonist, neuroprotectant and neurotoxin. Nat Med 1998; 4: 460– 3. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 7 Mennerick S, Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Todorovic SM, et al. . Effect of nitrous oxide on excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission in hippocampal cultures. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 9716– 26. Google Scholar PubMed 8 Nagele P, Metz LB, Crowder CM. Nitrous oxide (N(2)O) requires the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor for its action in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101: 8791– 6. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 9 Orestes P, Bojadzic D, Lee J, et al. . Free radical signalling underlies inhibition of CaV3.2 T-type calcium channels by nitrous oxide in the pain pathway. J Physiol 2011; 589: 135– 48. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 10 Epstein RM, Rackow H, Salanitre E, et al. . Influence of the concentration effect on the uptake of anesthetic mixtures: the second gas effect. Anesthesiology 1964; 25: 364– 71. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 11 Masuda T, Ikeda K. Elimination of nitrous oxide accelerates elimination of halothane: reversed second gas effect. Anesthesiology 1984; 60: 567– 8. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 12 Peyton PJ, Chao I, Weinberg L, et al. . Nitrous oxide diffusion and the second gas effect on emergence from anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 596– 60213. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 13 Myles PS, Leslie K, Chan MT, et al. . Avoidance of nitrous oxide for patients undergoing major surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2007; 107: 221– 31. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 14 Chan MT, Peyton PJ, Myles PS, et al. . Chronic postsurgical pain in the Evaluation of Nitrous Oxide in the Gas Mixture for Anaesthesia (ENIGMA)-II trial. Br J Anaesth 2016; 117: 801– 11. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 15 Myles PS, Leslie K, Chan MT, et al. . The safety of addition of nitrous oxide to general anaesthesia in at-risk patients having major non-cardiac surgery (ENIGMA-II): a randomised, single-blind trial. Lancet 2014; 384: 1446– 54. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 16 Peyton PJ, Wu CY. Nitrous oxide-related postoperative nausea and vomiting depends on duration of exposure. Anesthesiology 2014; 120: 1137– 45. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 17 Tramer M, Moore A, McQuay H. Omitting nitrous oxide in general anaesthesia: meta-analysis of intraoperative awareness and postoperative emesis in randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth 1996; 76: 186– 93. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 18 Myles PS, Leslie K, McNeil J, et al. . Bispectral index monitoring to prevent awareness during anaesthesia: the B-Aware randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 1757– 63. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 19 Smith NT, Eger EI 2nd, Stoelting RK, et al. . The cardiovascular and sympathomimetic responses to the addition of nitrous oxide to halothane in man. Anesthesiology 1970; 32: 410– 21. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 20 Chan MT, Wan AC, Gin T, et al. . Chronic postsurgical pain after nitrous oxide anesthesia. Pain 2011; 152: 2514– 20. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 21 Annequin D, Carbajal R, Chauvin P, et al. . Fixed 50% nitrous oxide oxygen mixture for painful procedures: a French survey. Pediatrics 2000; 105: E47. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 22 Onody P, Gil P, Hennequin M. Safety of inhalation of a 50% nitrous oxide/oxygen premix: a prospective survey of 35 828 administrations. Drug Saf 2006; 29: 633– 40. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 23 Zier JL, Liu M. Safety of high-concentration nitrous oxide by nasal mask for pediatric procedural sedation: experience with 7802 cases. Pediatr Emerg Care 2011; 27: 1107– 12. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 24 Tsze DS, Mallory MD, Cravero JP. Practice patterns and adverse events of nitrous oxide sedation and analgesia: a report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. J Pediatr 2016; 169: 260– 5 e2. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 25 Vetter TR. A comparison of EMLA cream versus nitrous oxide for pediatric venous cannulation. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 486– 90. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 26 Henderson JM, Spence DG, Komocar LM, et al. . Administration of nitrous oxide to pediatric patients provides analgesia for venous cannulation. Anesthesiology 1990; 72: 269– 71. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 27 Furuya A, Ito M, Fukao T, et al. . The effective time and concentration of nitrous oxide to reduce venipuncture pain in children. J Clin Anesth 2009; 21: 190– 3. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 28 Ekbom K, Kalman S, Jakobsson J, et al. . Efficient intravenous access without distress: a double-blind randomized study of midazolam and nitrous oxide in children and adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011; 165: 785– 91. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 29 Vetter TR. A comparison of EMLA cream versus nitrous oxide for pediatric venous cannulation. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7: 486– 90. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 30 Burton JH, Auble TE, Fuchs SM. Effectiveness of 50% nitrous oxide/50% oxygen during laceration repair in children. Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5: 112– 7. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 31 Luhmann JD, Kennedy RM, Porter FL, et al. . A randomized clinical trial of continuous-flow nitrous oxide and midazolam for sedation of young children during laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 37: 20– 7. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 32 Bar-Meir E, Zaslansky R, Regev E, et al. . Nitrous oxide administered by the plastic surgeon for repair of facial lacerations in children in the emergency room. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 1571– 5. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 33 Lee JH, Kim K, Kim TY, et al. . A randomized comparison of nitrous oxide versus intravenous ketamine for laceration repair in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012; 28: 1297– 301. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 34 Kanagasundaram SA, Lane LJ, Cavalletto BP, et al. . Efficacy and safety of nitrous oxide in alleviating pain and anxiety during painful procedures. Arch Dis Child 2001; 84: 492– 5. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 35 German M, Pavo MR, Palacios A, et al. . Use of fixed 50% nitrous oxide–oxygen mixture for lumbar punctures in pediatric patients. Pediatr Emerg Care 2011; 27: 244– 5. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 36 Zier JL, Rivard PF, Krach LE, et al. . Effectiveness of sedation using nitrous oxide compared with enteral midazolam for botulinum toxin A injections in children. Dev Med Child Neurol 2008; 50: 854– 8. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 37 Kumar R, Sneade C, Littler K. Effectiveness of sedation using nitrous oxide compared with enteral midazolam for botulinum toxin A injections in children. Dev Med Child Neurol 2009; 51: 838– 9. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 38 Brochard S, Blajan V, Lempereur M, et al. . Effectiveness of nitrous oxide and analgesic cream (lidocaine and prilocaine) for prevention of pain during intramuscular botulinum toxin injections in children. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2009; 52: 704– 16. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 39 Lanners HN, Rudzinska MA. Proceedings: microtubules and filaments during fertilization in Heliophrya erhardi (ciliata, suctoria). J Ultrastruct Res 1975; 52: 134. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 40 Hennrikus WL, Shin AY, Klingelberger CE. Self-administered nitrous oxide and a hematoma block for analgesia in the outpatient reduction of fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77: 335– 9. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 41 Gregory PR, Sullivan JA. Nitrous oxide compared with intravenous regional anesthesia in pediatric forearm fracture manipulation. J Pediatr Orthop 1996; 16: 187– 91. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 42 Luhmann JD, Schootman M, Luhmann SJ, et al. . A randomized comparison of nitrous oxide plus hematoma block versus ketamine plus midazolam for emergency department forearm fracture reduction in children. Pediatrics 2006; 118: e1078– 86. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 43 Zier JL, Kvam KA, Kurachek SC, et al. . Sedation with nitrous oxide compared with no sedation during catheterization for urologic imaging in children. Pediatr Radiol 2007; 37: 678– 84. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 44 Garcia J, Roure P, Hayem C, et al. . [Bronchial endoscopy under local anesthesia and pain in children. The value of a nitrous oxide-oxygen combination]. Rev Mal Respir 1998; 15: 179– 83. Google Scholar PubMed 45 Fauroux B, Onody P, Gall O, et al. . The efficacy of premixed nitrous oxide and oxygen for fiberoptic bronchoscopy in pediatric patients: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Chest 2004; 125: 315– 21. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 46 Michaud L, Gottrand F, Ganga-Zandzou PS, et al. . Nitrous oxide sedation in pediatric patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1999; 28: 310– 4. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 47 Payne CG, Edbrooke DL, Davies GK. Minor procedures in the accident and emergency department: can Entonox help? Arch Emerg Med 1991; 8: 24– 32. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 48 Ducasse JL, Siksik G, Durand-Bechu M, et al. . Nitrous oxide for early analgesia in the emergency setting: a randomized, double-blind multicenter prehospital trial. Acad Emerg Med 2013; 20: 178– 84. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 49 Uglow MG. Kocher’s painless reduction of anterior dislocation of the shoulder: a prospective randomised trial. Injury 1998; 29: 135– 7. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 50 Gleeson AP, Graham CA, Meyer AD. Intra-articular lignocaine versus Entonox for reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation. Injury 1999; 30: 403– 5. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 51 Kariman H, Majidi A, Amini A, et al. . Nitrous oxide/oxygen compared with fentanyl in reducing pain among adults with isolated extremity trauma: a randomized trial. Emerg Med Australas 2011; 23: 761– 8. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 52 Triner WR, Bartfield JM, Birdwell M, et al. . Nitrous oxide for the treatment of acute migraine headache. Am J Emerg Med 1999; 17: 252– 4. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 53 Richardson MG, Lopez BM, Baysinger CL. Should nitrous oxide be used for laboring patients? Anesthesiol Clin 2017; 35: 125– 43. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 54 Rosen MA. Nitrous oxide for relief of labor pain: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S110– 26. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 55 Waldenstrom U. Experience of labor and birth in 1111 women. J Psychosom Res 1999; 47: 471– 82. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 56 Leong EW, Sivanesaratnam V, Oh LL, et al. . Epidural analgesia in primigravidae in spontaneous labour at term: a prospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2000; 26: 271– 5. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 57 Hodnett ED. Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186: S160– 72. Google Scholar PubMed 58 Richardson MG, Lopez BM, Baysinger CL, et al. . Nitrous oxide during labor: maternal satisfaction does not depend exclusively on analgesic effectiveness. Anesth Analg 2017; 124: 548– 53. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 59 Trullas R, Skolnick P. Functional antagonists at the NMDA receptor complex exhibit antidepressant actions. Eur J Pharmacol 1990; 185: 1– 10. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 60 Ghasemi M, Phillips C, Trillo L, et al. . The role of NMDA receptors in the pathophysiology and treatment of mood disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2014; 47: 336– 58. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 61 Berman RM, Cappiello A, Anand A, et al. . Antidepressant effects of ketamine in depressed patients. Biol Psychiatry 2000; 47: 351– 4. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 62 Caddy C, Amit BH, McCloud TL, et al. . Ketamine and other glutamate receptor modulators for depression in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; CD011612. 63 Newport DJ, Carpenter LL, McDonald WM, et al. . Ketamine and other NMDA antagonists: early clinical trials and possible mechanisms in depression. Am J Psychiatry 2015; 172: 950– 66. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 64 Nagele P, Duma A, Kopec M, et al. . Nitrous oxide for treatment-resistant major depression: a proof-of-concept trial. Biol Psychiatry 2015; 78: 10– 8. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 65 Frasca V, Riazzi BS, Matthews RG. In vitro inactivation of methionine synthase by nitrous oxide. J Biol Chem 1986; 261: 15823– 6. Google Scholar PubMed 66 Banks EC, Doughty SW, Toms SM, et al. . Inhibition of cobalamin-dependent methionine synthase by substituted benzo-fused heterocycles. FEBS J 2007; 274: 287– 99. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 67 Sanders RD, Weimann J, Maze M. Biologic effects of nitrous oxide: a mechanistic and toxicologic review. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 707– 22. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 68 Chen Y, Liu X, Cheng CH, et al. . Leukocyte DNA damage and wound infection after nitrous oxide administration: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 1322– 31. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 69 Hogan K. Nitrous oxide genotoxicity. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 1258– 60. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 70 Solmaz FA, Can OS, Kadioglu E, et al. . Effects of using sevoflurane with nitrous oxide and remifentanil on DNA damage. Acta Med Mediterr 2014; 30: 775– 83. 71 Karabiyik L, Sardas S, Polat U, et al. . Comparison of genotoxicity of sevoflurane and isoflurane in human lymphocytes studied in vivo using the comet assay. Mutat Res 2001; 492: 99– 107. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 72 Wronska-Nofer T, Nofer JR, Jajte J, et al. . Oxidative DNA damage and oxidative stress in subjects occupationally exposed to nitrous oxide (N(2)O). Mutat Res 2012; 731: 58– 63. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 73 Mehta S, Burton P, Simms JS. Monitoring of occupational exposure to nitrous oxide. Can Anaesth Soc J 1978; 25: 419– 23. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 74 Gray WM. Occupational exposure to nitrous oxide in four hospitals. Anaesthesia 1989; 44: 511– 4. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 75 Henderson KA, Matthews IP. Environmental monitoring of nitrous oxide during dental anaesthesia. Br Dent J 2000; 188: 617– 9. Google Scholar PubMed 76 Rowland AS, Baird DD, Shore DL, et al. . Nitrous oxide and spontaneous abortion in female dental assistants. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 141: 531– 8. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 77 Rowland AS, Baird DD, Weinberg CR, et al. . Reduced fertility among women employed as dental assistants exposed to high levels of nitrous oxide. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 993– 7. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 78 Nitrous Oxide [Internet]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2012 [cited 2017Jul28]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/nitrousoxide/. 79 Control of Substances Hazardous to Health 2002 (COSHH) [Internet]. Control of Substances Hazardous to Health 2002 (COSHH). [cited 2017Jul28]. Available from: http://www.hse.gov.uk/nanotechnology/coshh.htm. 80 Sanders RD, Weimann J, Maze M. Biologic effects of nitrous oxide: a mechanistic and toxicologic review. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 707– 22. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 81 Portmann RW, Daniel JS, Ravishankara AR. Stratospheric ozone depletion due to nitrous oxide: influences of other gases. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2012; 367: 1256– 64. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 82 Overview of Greenhouse Gases [Internet]. EPA. Environmental Protection Agency; 2017 [cited 2017Jul28]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases. 83 United States Energy Information Analysis. Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2009. https://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/ghg_report/pdf/0573(2009).pdf] 84 Ravishankara AR, Daniel JS, Portmann RW. Nitrous oxide (N2O): the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century. Science 2009; 326: 123– 5. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 85 Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer [Internet]. United Nations. United Nations Environment Programme; 1985 [cited 2017Jul28]. Available from: https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/1988/09/19880922%2003-14%20AM/Ch_XXVII_02p.pdf 86 Andersen SO, Halberstadt ML, Borgford-parnell N. Stratospheric ozone, global warming, and the principle of unintended consequences – an ongoing science and policy success story. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 2013; 63: 607– 47. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS 87 van Amsterdam J, Nabben T, van den Brink W. Recreational nitrous oxide use: prevalence and risks. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2015; 73: 790– 6. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 88 Garland EL, Howard MO, Perron BE. Nitrous oxide inhalation among adolescents: prevalence, correlates, and co-occurrence with volatile solvent inhalation. J Psychoactive Drugs 2009; 41: 337– 47. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 89 Kaar SJ, Ferris J, Waldron J, et al. . Up: the rise of nitrous oxide abuse. An international survey of contemporary nitrous oxide use. J Psychopharmacol 2016; 30: 395– 401. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 90 Koyanagi S, Himukashi S, Mukaida K, et al. . Dopamine D2-like receptor in the nucleus accumbens is involved in the antinociceptive effect of nitrous oxide. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 1904– 9. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 91 Zhang C, Davies MF, Guo TZ, et al. . The analgesic action of nitrous oxide is dependent on the release of norepinephrine in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 1401– 7. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 92 Duma A, Cartmill C, Blood J, et al. . The hematological effects of nitrous oxide anesthesia in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 2015; 120: 1325– 30. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 93 Banerjee RV, Matthews RG. Cobalamin-dependent methionine synthase. FASEB J 1990; 4: 1450– 9. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 94 Nagele P, Zeugswetter B, Wiener C, et al. . Influence of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms on homocysteine concentrations after nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 36– 43. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 95 Adams HA, Kling D, Boldt J, et al. . Effects of nitrous oxide on endocrine stress response and haemodynamic parameters during coronary artery surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 38: 73– 8. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 96 Ishiguro Y, Goto T, Nakata Y, et al. . Effect of xenon on autonomic cardiovascular control – comparison with isoflurane and nitrous oxide. J Clin Anesth 2000; 12: 196– 201. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 97 Lampe GH, Donegan JH, Rupp SM, et al. . Nitrous oxide and epinephrine-induced arrhythmias. Anesth Analg 1990; 71: 602– 5. Google Scholar PubMed 98 McKinney MS, Fee JP. Cardiovascular effects of 50% nitrous oxide in older adult patients anaesthetized with isoflurane or halothane. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 169– 73. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 99 Shiga T, Wajima Z, Inoue T, et al. . Nitrous oxide produces minimal hemodynamic changes in patients receiving a propofol-based anesthetic: an esophageal Doppler ultrasound study. Can J Anaesth 2003; 50: 649– 52. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 100 Myles PS, Chan MT, Leslie K, et al. . Effect of nitrous oxide on plasma homocysteine and folate in patients undergoing major surgery. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100: 780– 6. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 101 Myles PS, Chan MT, Kaye DM, et al. . Effect of nitrous oxide anesthesia on plasma homocysteine and endothelial function. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 657– 63. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 102 Reiz S. Nitrous oxide augments the systemic and coronary haemodynamic effects of isoflurane in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1983; 27: 464– 9. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 103 Kozmary SV, Lampe GH, Benefiel D, et al. . No finding of increased myocardial ischemia during or after carotid endarterectomy under anesthesia with nitrous oxide. Anesth Analg 1990; 71: 591– 6. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 104 Badner NH, Beattie WS, Freeman D, et al. . Nitrous oxide-induced increased homocysteine concentrations are associated with increased postoperative myocardial ischemia in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 1073– 9. Google Scholar PubMed 105 Hohner P, Backman C, Diamond G, et al. . Anaesthesia for abdominal aortic surgery in patients with coronary artery disease, Part II: effects of nitrous oxide on systemic and coronary haemodynamics, regional ventricular function and incidence of myocardial ischaemia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994; 38: 793– 804. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 106 Myles PS, Leslie K, Peyton P, et al. . Nitrous oxide and perioperative cardiac morbidity (ENIGMA-II) Trial: rationale and design. Am Heart J 2009; 157: 488– 494 e1. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 107 Leslie K, Myles PS, Kasza J, et al. . Nitrous oxide and serious long-term morbidity and mortality in the Evaluation of Nitrous Oxide in the Gas Mixture for Anaesthesia (ENIGMA)-II Trial. Anesthesiology 2015; 123: 1267– 80. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 108 Hunter AR. Problems of anaesthesia in artificial pneumothorax. Proc R Soc Med 1955; 48: 765– 8. Google Scholar PubMed 109 Eger EI 2nd, Saidman LJ. Hazards of nitrous oxide anesthesia in bowel obstruction and pneumothorax. Anesthesiology 1965; 26: 61– 6. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 110 Matz GJ, Rattenborg CG, Holaday DA. Effects of nitrous oxide on middle ear pressure. Anesthesiology 1967; 28: 948– 50. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 111 Chinn K, Brown OE, Manning SC. Effects of inhalant anesthesia on the middle ear as measured by tympanometry. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119: 283– 7. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 112 Fu AD, McDonald HR, Eliott D, et al. . Complications of general anesthesia using nitrous oxide in eyes with preexisting gas bubbles. Retina 2002; 22: 569– 74. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 113 Munson ES, Merrick HC. Effect of nitrous oxide on venous air embolism. Anesthesiology 1966; 27: 783– 7. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 114 Munson ES. Effect of nitrous oxide on the pulmonary circulation during venous air embolism. Anesth Analg 1971; 50: 785– 93. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 115 Losasso TJ, Muzzi DA, Dietz NM, et al. . Fifty percent nitrous oxide does not increase the risk of venous air embolism in neurosurgical patients operated upon in the sitting position. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: 21– 30. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 116 Schulte-Sasse U, Hess W, Tarnow J. Pulmonary vascular responses to nitrous oxide in patients with normal and high pulmonary vascular resistance. Anesthesiology 1982; 57: 9– 13. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 117 Konstadt SN, Reich DL, Thys DM. Nitrous oxide does not exacerbate pulmonary hypertension or ventricular dysfunction in patients with mitral valvular disease. Can J Anaesth 1990; 37: 613– 7. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 118 de Vasconcellos K, Sneyd JR. Nitrous oxide: are we still in equipoise? A qualitative review of current controversies. Br J Anaesth 2013; 111: 877– 85. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 119 Haelewyn B, David HN, Rouillon C, et al. . Neuroprotection by nitrous oxide: facts and evidence. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: 2651– 9. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 120 Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Hartman RE, Izumi Y, et al. . Early exposure to common anesthetic agents causes widespread neurodegeneration in the developing rat brain and persistent learning deficits. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 876– 82. Google Scholar PubMed 121 Ma D, Williamson P, Januszewski A, et al. . Xenon mitigates isoflurane-induced neuronal apoptosis in the developing rodent brain. Anesthesiology 2007; 106: 746– 53. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 122 Nagele P, Tallchief D, Blood J, et al. . Nitrous oxide anesthesia and plasma homocysteine in adolescents. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 843– 8. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 123 Leslie K, Myles P, Devereaux PJ, et al. . Nitrous oxide and serious morbidity and mortality in the POISE trial. Anesth Analg 2013; 116: 1034– 40. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices)
British Medical Bulletin – Oxford University Press
Published: Mar 1, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.
Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.
It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera