Abstract This introduces a roundtable on the articulations of religious practices and imaginaries with the creation and remaking of urban landscapes in Bangalore (India), Vinh City (Vietnam), and Houston and New Orleans (United States). While recognizing that urban expressions of religion are articulated with political and economic forces, this collection shifts the focus to the spatial, material, and sensory media with which the religious and the spiritual are enacted within urban life worlds. We aim to advance a critical intervention in the analysis of religion and spirituality, but also to map the ways that different publics create designs for and of urban life through religious and spiritual practices that may celebrate, interrogate, or challenge modernist, liberal, or postcolonial/postsocialist programs and geographies. TYPIFYING WHAT Jennifer Robinson (2006) has called “ordinary cities,” California’s capital, Sacramento, founded as the gateway for California’s mid-nineteenth-century gold rush, is now dominated by government institutions, port and sport facilities, malls, and housing developments. In the last two decades, public and private investments in downtown districts and outlying edge cities have brought a new wave of urban growth and development in Sacramento’s deindustrialized center and its suburban periphery; at the same time, the regions lying between the city’s core and its affluent suburbs, where the city’s ethnic minority communities (Chinese, Latino, South and Southeast Asian, and African American, among others) are concentrated, have been sites of disinvestment, failed development, and resource-poor communities (Hernandez 2009, 2014; “Sacramento Diasporas Project”). While this socio-spatial pattern and the narrative of class formation, gentrification, and exclusion it contains will be familiar to many readers, what may be less familiar are the emergent geographies of religiosity that map these in-between areas and that make them sites for innovation, community expansion, and resilience. In these respects, the religious geographies of Sacramento and other “ordinary cities” can be understood as being embedded in enduring (and unfinished) social and historical processes of becoming (Schwenkel, this issue; Hancock and Srinivas 2008). Consider the thoroughfares whose paths between center city and suburban developments crosscut these in-between areas. Interspersed between abandoned and repurposed military sites and storage facilities, low-income housing, ethnic groceries, pawn shops, and yoga studios are a variety of religious spaces, dating from the 1980s onwards, that accompanied urban and economic restructuring (see Figure 1). These social spaces, which arise as sites of both moral critique and moral possibility, serve new and established religious movements, as well as diverse spiritualities. They range from purpose-built churches and temples to community centers and houses fronted by signboards advertising evangelical Christian services. A large Laxmi Narayan temple on Elder Creek Road in south Sacramento brings together Gujarati, North Indian, Nepali, and Fijian Hindus to an altar space featuring marble images in a north Indian style (see Figure 2), but it also hosts gatherings of multinational devotees of the south Indian global guru, Sathya Sai Baba, in its kitchen annex. The Gurdwara Sahib, a Sikh meeting space in West Sacramento, occupies a refurbished Christian church that was purchased in 1983. Other sites, such as the Kuan Yin temple, with a Chinese style roof and a soothing pool (associated with the Indo-Chinese Friendship Association), was built on the sinews of a farmhouse (see Figures 3 and 4). And, in 2010, a stretch of one connector (Stockton Boulevard) was designated “Little Saigon,” a reference to the local Vietnamese American community, with its Buddhist worship and teaching spaces becoming anchors for a vision of urban futurity rooted in and sustained by a traumatic history. As a group, these kinds of new spaces of religious and spiritual practice, while varied in their constituencies and orientations, have become spaces that materialize moral imaginations by reconstituting communities through voluntarism and education, broadening trans-ethnic alliances, and reconciling past traumas through various forms of civic action and community engagement. Figure 1. View largeDownload slide Calvary Chapel, south Sacramento. Photo by Mary Hancock. Figure 1. View largeDownload slide Calvary Chapel, south Sacramento. Photo by Mary Hancock. Figure 2. View largeDownload slide Laxmi Narayan temple shrine, Elder Creek Road, Sacramento. Photo by Smriti Srinivas. Figure 2. View largeDownload slide Laxmi Narayan temple shrine, Elder Creek Road, Sacramento. Photo by Smriti Srinivas. Figure 3. View largeDownload slide Kuan Yin temple, Elder Creek Road, Sacramento. Photo by Smriti Srinivas. Figure 3. View largeDownload slide Kuan Yin temple, Elder Creek Road, Sacramento. Photo by Smriti Srinivas. Figure 4. View largeDownload slide Exterior pool of Kuan Yin temple, Elder Creek Road, Sacramento. Photo by Smriti Srinivas. Figure 4. View largeDownload slide Exterior pool of Kuan Yin temple, Elder Creek Road, Sacramento. Photo by Smriti Srinivas. We invoke Sacramento as an ordinary example of a global city—not the first-tier command and control centers described by Saskia Sassen or David Harvey—but a type of urban world that, over the latter half of the twentieth century, has become increasingly familiar to many of us. Cities not unlike Sacramento dot the globe—from New Orleans and Houston in the southern United States, to Vietnam’s recently rebuilt Vinh City, to southern India’s cyber-technology hub of Bangalore—and this roundtable concerns the articulations of religiosities and urban imaginaries in these landscapes. Such cities are both ubiquitous and unexceptional in form and in the entwinement of multifarious religious and spiritual spaces and practices in that form. In these places, global forces and flows converge, worldly imaginaries are expressed, and the urban is (re)assembled through everyday experiments in survival and aspiration.1 Set within a mottled urban fabric of both abandonment and redevelopment, these spaces are entwined with and sustained by informal, sometimes invisible, and transversal economic and social ventures and associated mobilities. These religiosities form milieus of innovation that articulate with cities and the histories and spaces of mobility that integrate, extend, and connect them. Acting on and with these imaginative resources, persons inhabit, represent, and transform urban space through responses to urban imperatives that range from finding novel ways to address resource-poor conditions to reinventing religious architectures in new landscapes. The articles that make up this roundtable are the outcomes of conversations initiated at a 2014 symposium, “Spirited Topographies,” sponsored by the University of California Humanities Network, that concerned the various ways that religiosities are manifest in and inscribe contemporary urban worlds. If our own experiences with cities like Sacramento helped catalyze some questions, our varied scholarly paths brought us to the other, “ordinary” cities that we reflect on in this roundtable. In urban worlds made by ever more mobile persons, commodities, finances, images, and ideas, and by neoliberal restructuring of the spaces of work, leisure, residence, and production, how have various imaginations of citizenship, cultural memory, and space—both dystopic and utopic—emerged from the articulations of religion and spirituality with those changing landscapes? How does a mobility-oriented approach allow us to engage the imaginative practices of urban actors, while also allowing us to theorize the urban as a space of experimentation and cultural futurity? For, although it is undeniable that degradation, fear, and violence are parts of urban life, cities also promise hope and healing. How might cities and religion be theorized to better account for these diverse, yet mutually imbricated potentialities? The questions that this roundtable engages draw directly and indirectly on a conceptual resource—the mobility paradigm—that over the past decade has coalesced as a product of the interdisciplinary concerns of the geo-humanities (Büscher et al. 2011; Cresswell 2006; Cresswell and Merriman 2016; Jensen 2013; Urry 2007). The mobility paradigm directs our attention to movement as a fundamental component in the making of social and cultural institutions, spaces, and identities. “Movement” here refers to walking, mechanical transport, virtual and imaginative mobility, as well as the blockages and immobilities that constrain and channel movement. This conceptual entry derives from but also departs from other kinds of spatially oriented approaches in the social sciences and humanities by flipping the idea that a built space (and the values or ideas asserted therein) is the central mover of action or institutions, such as religiosity, memory, or nationalism. Instead, it starts with mobility, and thus contingency, and asks how various fixed and institutional forms arise as products or coordinators of mobility, or as barriers to mobility. While injecting contingency and thus agency into the study of space, this approach also enables us to spatialize our thinking about religion’s role in community formations and identities and in the affective orientations that bind and unbind us to each other and the world (see Tweed 2008). Turning to urban spaces, a mobility-oriented perspective directs our attention to the ways that cities are produced as nodes for many kinds of movement. They are inscribed, physically and geographically, as spaces of convergence where different peoples, economic practices, languages, and commodities come together. These convergences, moreover, are frequently organized by religious imaginaries and, for that reason, cities have long been mapped and produced by religious actors, practices, and sites. If some settlements became urban through processes driven by religious practices or achieved new meanings through religious mobility across space, other well-established cities offered fertile sites for the emergence and growth of religious movements (Bianca 2000; Çelik et al. 1996; Favro 1996; Heitzman 2008; Roberts and Roberts 2003; Werbner 2003; Wheatley 1971). Recent years have seen the rise of “faith-based organizations” whose members have intervened in urban landscapes to provide housing, food, medicine, and social services—and in certain cases, to proselytize—in response to de-industrialization, violence, natural disasters, migrations, and inequality (Arif 2008; Carter 2010, 2014; Deeb 2006; Elisha 2011; Khalil 2015; Lichterman 2005; Lipsitz, this issue; McRoberts 2003; Qasmiyeh and Fiddian-Qasmiyeh 2013; Srinivas 2008). Contemporary studies of the articulations of religious identity and life with urban structures and global circuits have also recontextualized understandings of existing religious traditions within colonial, postcolonial, postsocialist, or transnational geographies (Becker et al. 2014; Diouf and Leichtman 2009; Eiesland 2000; Elmore 2005; Han 2010; Hervieu-Léger 2002; Nyitray 2006; Pena 2011; Pow 2015; Schwenkel 2009, 2012; Shacher 2015; Wilhelm-Solomon et al. 2017). They also highlight transversal collaborations between differently situated actors, whose own mobilities have shaped movements of material, social, and symbolic value across space in activities such as shrine-building, life cycle observances, and commemoration in new urban landscapes (Ahmed 2013; Garnett and Harris 2013; Górak-Sosnowska 2013; Hancock 2008; Orsi 1985, 2005; Srinivas 2001, 2015; Vasquez and Marquardt 2003; Waghorne 2004, 2016). Although the ways that religious institutions, representations, and actors inhabit urban worlds are amply documented, the exploration of religiosity within geography and urban studies has remained, until recently, underdeveloped (see Kong 2001, 2010; Kong et al. 2013). This owes something to the ways that Euro-American secularisms are embedded in social scientific discourses on cities: if the “urban modern/postmodern” is necessarily the “secular,” religiosity, especially as it takes shape within public realms, can only be read as a failure of the modernizing project and as a parochial contamination of cosmopolitan lifeworlds (Connolly 1999,19–25; Hancock 2015, 219–21). Such perspectives have hampered work on cities of the global South, which are often dismissed as object lessons in failed modernity. They do not recognize the ways in which Enlightenment values and discourses and positivist methods have lent character and meaning to the religion/secularity binary, to urban planning, and to spatial modernity in Europe and North America. And they may foreclose critical explorations of utopian and, what some have called, “post-secular” designs for urban living and the forms of individual and collective agency that they underwrite, including the diverse forms that secularism, as a form of moral imagination, may take as it shapes cities’ spatial and material landscapes (Beaumont and Baker 2011; Bartolini et al. 2017; Connolly 1999; Das 2010; Engelke 2013; Habermas 2008; Hancock and Srinivas 2008; Hegner and Margry 2017; Molendijk et al. 2010; Srinivas 2015; Uberoi 2002). By bringing together three grounded studies of urban religious expression, this roundtable aims to resituate debates regarding urban place-making by interrogating the tendency to define the city as either the preeminent space of the secular or as the site of religion’s violent return, and by attending to alternate and emergent ways in which religion and spirituality are imbricated in urban landscapes and socialities. The approach to religion here treads a middle ground between the historical contingency of “religion” in various disciplines or social formations (e.g., Asad 1993, 2003) and religion-as-medium (e.g., de Vries 2001), by stressing religiosity, the practices, subcultures, discourses, media, affective dispositions, and materialities that subsume both canonical practices of “world religions” as well as the diversity of orientations glossed as “spiritual.”2 The roundtable’s process-oriented approach to urban place-making attends necessarily to the many kinds of mobilities that engender and are articulated within city spaces, including transport and travel; the circulation of investments and remittances and labor; the ritualized spatial practices of religious, racial, and national belonging, and of resistance and civil disobedience; the imaginative and virtual mobility of images, maps, and texts; and the communicative mobility of conversation and telephony. By recognizing mobility as a property of things and people, as circulation, and as geographical movement, we understand the urban as a process of various replacements and displacements articulated with the logics of emergence, transition, and transformation that religiosities may express. In this issue, Smriti Srinivas sees forms of “post-Hindu” expression in new urban mobilities and infrastructures. She emphasizes the hopeful futurity in the “healing fables” born of recombined Hindu, Buddhist, and theosophical ideals, and expressed in the diverse sites, from street shrines and mobile altars to monumental meditation halls, that make up Bangalore’s new urban and suburban landscapes. This, like recent work on cross-sectarian engagements with ritual sites nominally associated with a single tradition (e.g., Novetzke 2008; Bigelow 2010), complicates recent work on place-making in India, much of which has exposed the ongoing spatial strategies of racialized Hindu nationalism, including nationalists’ uses of pilgrimage and processional forms to threaten Muslim communities (e.g., Fuller 2001; Hansen 2001). Along with ethical responsibility to scrutinize and respond to those strategies, which, under the current Hindu nationalist government, have continued to foment deadly violence, Srinivas argues for our continuing need to comprehend other, more hopeful intersections of religiosity with urban designs for living (see also Das 2010). The roundtable also contributes to discussions of place-making by exploring what we call urban re-fabulation, the reiterative, vernacular productions in and of urban spaces (such as murals, improvised shrines, stories, or body cultures [see Figures 5 and 6]) that incorporate idioms of devotion and sacrality. Such efforts inscribe religion and spirituality in cityscapes through material, performative, and other means (Orsi 1999; Osumare 2010a, 2010b; Roberts and Roberts 2003, 2008; Srinivas 2001; Sutherland 2017). In a similar vein, Christina Schwenkel (this issue) traces historical emergences and occlusions of spaces of popular Buddhist religiosity in Vinh City, Vietnam, over its socialist and now postsocialist periods of development (cf. Niedźwiedź 2017). She emphasizes Vinh’s city-making as a process of “reassemblage,” pointing out that while some representations deemed traditional have been incorporated within state-sanctioned commemorations, others have been used to obstruct municipal redevelopment efforts. Together, these strategies point to the multiple, and not always consistent, ways that religion contributes to the making and remaking of urban space in Vietnam, while also complicating its official secularist ethos. Figure 5. View largeDownload slide Buddha image in a Vietnamese religious center set against Sacramento’s urban periphery. Photo by Smriti Srinivas. Figure 5. View largeDownload slide Buddha image in a Vietnamese religious center set against Sacramento’s urban periphery. Photo by Smriti Srinivas. Figure 6. View largeDownload slide Shiva image in serene contemplation in low-income south Sacramento. Photo by Smriti Srinivas. Figure 6. View largeDownload slide Shiva image in serene contemplation in low-income south Sacramento. Photo by Smriti Srinivas. Our interest in re-fabulation as a mode of spatial production is aligned with other recent efforts that explore the relations of cityscapes to vernacular and civic imaginaries that are inflected by diverse spiritual and ethical projects. Global Prayers (2016), for example, has made use of collaborations between art and science-based researchers, and explores the images and sounds, spaces, and practices of the religious in eight metropolitan centers from Lagos to Berlin (Becker et al. 2014). By contrast, focusing on artists largely from urban Senegal and Dakar, Allen F. Roberts and Mary Nooter Roberts brought together stunning visual celebrations of the Sufi saint, Amadou Bamba, both in text (Roberts and Roberts 2003, 2008) and as a curated exhibition at the UCLA Fowler Museum of Cultural History. Other significant examples include Mary Miss’s The City as Living Laboratory (2016) focused on New York City, and The Urban Sacred (2017) and Urbanizing Faith (2016), both multi-city initiatives. While forms of urban re-fabulation may express religious transculturalism, hybridity, exclusivity, or other nuances depending on the context, the advance of capitalism has also set the stage for a wide range of new religious responses to its desires and fears, from witchcraft accusations to the “prosperity gospel” (Asamoah-Gyadu 2005; Comaroff and Comaroff 2001; Guyer 2007; Stoll and Garrard-Burnett 1993; Weller 2001). Although capitalism and neoliberalism’s impacts are spatialized in the monumentality of high-rise structures, billboards, and transport hubs, religious idioms and practices may be entwined in their realization and use. Indeed, the very forces of privatization and deregulation that mark neoliberal statecraft may anchor their own speculative theologies, while also offering openings for various religious interventions, often in what has come to be called “faith-based” service (see Sadler 2014). In the cases analyzed by Srinivas (this issue), we encounter several such monumental spaces that have emerged from the labor and utopian visons of religious actors rather than the state or corporate institutions. The often-aggressive verticality of modern urban spaces also entails the creation of underscapes, spaces of abandonment and socio-cultural amnesia, such as empty homes, decommissioned factories, and vacant lots, left in the wake of disinvestment and deindustrialization as well as retreating states. Such strategies create impoverishment and zones of exclusion that, in turn, may be claimed through habitation or use for new, improvisational, or precarious forms of life. In such contexts, emergent collectives—youth cultures, informal strata, middle classes, religious movements, or ethnic groups—may draw on religious, postsecular, or utopian registers to create designs for living that challenge modernist, racialized, or transnational geographies (De Boeck and Plissart 2004; Roberts and Roberts 2003; Simone 2004; Varzi 2006). In his comparison of African Americans’ creative interventions in two urban landscapes—Houston’s Project Row Houses and New Orleans’ street parades—George Lipsitz (this issue) argues that these artistic projects turn places of racialized containment and confinement into venues for envisioning and enacting new kinds of physical and psychological mobility (see also Lipsitz 2011). These new sites in Houston and New Orleans are borne of subjugated peoples’ moral commitments to “making right things come to pass.” As a group, the contributors to the Spirited Topographies roundtable recognize the many ways in which the urban is produced by the state, capital, and market; at the same time, we insist that such productions are never total. Recognizing that the city is a “nexus of situated and transnational ideas, institutions, actors and practices that together demand an analytic of assemblage” (Ong 2011, 4), this roundtable takes as its point of departure the spatial, material, and sensory media with which the religious and the spiritual are enacted within urban life worlds. We work outward from a set of keywords—mobilities, re-fabulation, underscapes—to advance a critical intervention in the analysis of religion and spirituality, but also to map the ways that different publics create designs for and of urban life through religious and spiritual practices that may celebrate, interrogate, or challenge modernist, liberal, or postcolonial/postsocialist programs and geographies. With this effort, we hope to continue a conversation about the ways that urbanity and religiosity are mutually invoked, in Stephan Lanz’s words, in reciprocal interaction “producing defining and transforming each other” (Lanz 2014, 25–27). Spirited Topographies is a product of work supported by a University of California Humanities Research Network-funded Multi-Campus Research Group (MRG), Urban Place-Making and Religiosity (2013–2015), and an earlier Working Group, Spaces for the Future: Religion and Urban Place-Making (2012–2013). The group organized two UC-wide symposia. One, “Spirited Topographies,” was held on May 9, 2014 at the University of California, Davis, with the support of UC Davis’s Institute for Social Sciences and Division of Social Sciences, Davis Humanities Institute, Middle East/South Asia Studies Program, African American and African Studies Program, Department of Anthropology, and Religious Studies, and the University of California Humanities Network. A subsequent graduate conference, “Spirits of the City” (May 30–31, 2015), was also supported by the University of California Humanities Network, as well as by UCSB’s College of Letters and Sciences, and the Departments of Anthropology, History, and Religious Studies at UCSB. The authors wish to acknowledge and thank UC’s Humanities Network for its funding and to thank the core scholars with whom we collaborated in these projects, including George Lipsitz, Vivian- Lee Nyitray, Allen Roberts, Mary Nooter Roberts, Christina Schwenkel, and Roxanne Varzi, as well as several others who contributed to our work, including Bascom Guffin, Jesus Hernandez, Halifu Osumare, Bettina Ng’weno, Michael Rios, Simon Sadler, James Smith, and Lauren Smyth. We are also grateful for the guidance and support of the JAAR general editor, Cynthia Eller. REFERENCES Ahmed, Nazneen. 2013. “ Marking a Good Death: Muslim Burial Sites and Practices in Britain from 1800 to the Present.” In Rescripting Religion in the City , edited by Garnett Jane and Harris Alana, 103– 14. London: Ashgate. Yasmin Arif. 2008. “ Humanitarian Biopolitics, City Spaces, and Acts of Religion.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 ( 3): 671– 89. Asad, Talal. 1993. Genealogies of Religion . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Asad, Talal. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Asamoah-Gyadu, K. 2005. African Charismatics: Current Developments within Independent Indigenous Pentecostalism in Ghana . Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. Barker, Joshua, Eric Harms, and Johan Lindquist. 2013. “ Introduction to Special Issue: Figuring the Transformed City.” City and Society 25 ( 2): 159– 72. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Bartolini, Nadia, Chris Robert, MacKian Sara, and Pile Steve. 2017. “ The Place of Spirit: Modernity and the Geographies of Spirituality.” Progress in Human Geography 41 ( 3): 338– 54. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Beaumont, Justin, and Baker Christopher, eds. 2011. Postsecular Cities: Space, Theory, Practice . London: Continuum. Becker, Jochen, Katrin Kingan, Stephan, Lanz, and Wildner Kathrin, eds. 2014. Global Prayers: Contemporary Manifestations of the Religious in the City . Berlin: Lars Müller Publishers. Bender, Courtney, and McRoberts Omar. 2012. “Mapping a Field: Why and How to Study Spirituality. ” Paper of the Working Group on Spirituality, Political Engagement, and Public Life. New York: Social Science Research Council. Bianca, Stefano. 2000. Urban Form in the Arab World: Past and Present . London and New York: Routledge. Bigelow, Anna. 2010. Sharing the Sacred: Practicing Pluralism in Muslim North India . New York: Oxford University Press. Büscher, Monika, Urry John, and Witchger Katian, eds. 2011. Mobile Methods . London: Routledge. Carter, Rebecca. 2010. “The Blessed Placemakers: Violent Crime, Moral Transformation and Urban Redevelopment in Post-Katrina New Orleans. ” PhD diss., University of Michigan. Carter, Rebecca. 2014. “ Valued Lives in Violent Places: Urban Placemaking at a Civil Rights Memorial in New Orleans.” City and Society 26: 239– 61. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed PubMed Çelik, Zeynap, Favro Diane, and Ingersoll Richard, eds. 1996. Streets: Critical Perspectives on Public Space . Berkeley: University of California Press. Comaroff, John, and Jean L. Comaroff. 2001. “ Millennial Capitalism: First Thoughts on a Second Coming.” In Millennial Capitalism and the Culture of Neoliberalism , edited by Comaroff John and Comaroff Jean L., 1– 56. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Connolly, William. 1999. Why I am Not a Secularist . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Connolly, William. 2008. Capitalism and Christianity, American Style . Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Cresswell, Tim. 2006. On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World . London: Routledge. Cresswell, Tim, and Merriman Peter, eds. 2016. Geographies of Mobilities: Practices, Spaces, Subjects . London: Routledge. Das, Veena. 2010. “ Moral and Spiritual Striving in the Everyday: To Be a Muslim in Contemporary India.” In Ethical Life in South Asia , edited by Pandian Anand and Ali Daud, 232– 52. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. De Boeck, Filip, Plissart M.. 2004. Kinshasa: Tales of the Invisible City . Ghent and Tervuren, Belgium: Ludion/Royal Museum for Central Africa. Deeb, Laura. 2006. An Enchanted Modern: Gender and Public Piety in Shi’i Lebanon . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. de Vries, Hent. 2001. “ In Media Res.” In Religion and Media , edited by de Vries Hent and Weber Samuel, 3– 40. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Diouf, Mamadou, and Leichtman Mara, eds. 2009. Islam in Senegal . New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Eiesland, Nancy L. 2000. A Particular Place: Urban Restructuring and Religious Ecology in a Southern Exurb . New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Elisha, Omri. 2011. Moral Ambition: Mobilization and Social Outreach in Evangelical Megachurches . Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Elmore, Mark. 2005. “ Stately (Dis)Placement: Narrative, Place, and Postcoloniality.” Epoché 25 ( 2): 139– 65. Engelke, Matthew. 2013. God’s Agents: Biblical Publicity in Contemporary England . Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Favro, Diane. 1996. The Urban Image of Augustan Rome . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fuller, Christopher. 2001. “ The Vinayaka Chathurthi Festival and Hindutva in Tamil Nadu.” Economic and Political Weekly 34: 1607– 16. Garnett, Jane, and Harris Alana. 2013. “ Church without Walls: Mapping the Sacred in East London.” In Rescripting Religion in the City , edited by Garnett Jane and Harris Alana, 115– 30. London: Ashgate. Global Prayers: Redemption and Liberation in the City. 2016. Available at http://globalprayers.info/about/. Accessed January 8, 2016. Górak-Sosnowska, Katarzyna. 2013. “ Does Warsaw Need a Mosque? Debates on Multi-Culturalism and National Identity in Poland.” In Rescripting Religion in the City , edited by Garnett Jane and Harris Alana, 235– 46. London: Ashgate. Guyer, Jane I. 2007. “ Prophecy and the Near Future: Thoughts on Macroeconomic, Evangelical, and Punctuated Time.” American Ethnologist 343 ( 3): 409– 21. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Habermas, Jürgen. 2008. “ Notes on Post-Secular Society.” New Perspectives Quarterly 25 ( 4): 17– 29. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Han, Judy Ju Hui. 2010. “ Reaching the Unreached in the 10/40 Window: The Missionary Geoscience of Race, Difference and Distance.” In Mapping the End Times: American Evangelical Geopolitics and Apocalyptic Visions , edited by Dittmer Jason and Sturm Tristan, 183– 207. London: Ashgate. Hancock, Mary. 2008. The Politics of Heritage from Madras to Chennai . Bloomington: University of Indiana Press. Hancock, Mary. 2015. “ Short-Term Mission Voluntarism and the Postsecular Imaginary.” In Religion and Volunteering: Complex, Contested and Ambiguous Relationships , edited by Hustinx Lesley, Johan von Essen, Haers Jacques, and Mels Sara, 217– 37. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Hancock, Mary, and Srinivas Smriti. 2008. “ Spaces of Modernity: Religion and the Urban in Asia and Africa.” In Symposium on Religion and the Formation of Modern Urban Space in Asia and Africa , edited by Hancock Mary and Srinivas Smriti, 617– 30. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 ( 3): 617– 709. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Hansen, Thomas Blom. 2001. Wages of Violence: Naming and Identity in Postcolonial Bombay . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Hegner, Victoria and Peter Jan Margry,eds. 2017. Spiritualizing the City . London: Routledge. Heitzman, James. 2008. The City in South Asia . New York: Routledge. Hernandez, Jesus. 2009. “ Redlining Revisited: Mortgage Patterns in Sacramento, California, 1930–2007.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33 ( 2): 291– 313. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Hernandez, Jesus. 2014. “Where We Pray.” Paper presented at Spirited Topographies Symposium, University of California Davis, May 9. Hervieu-Léger, Danielle. 2002. “ Space and Religion: New Approaches to Religious Spatiality in Modernity.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research (26) 1: 99– 105. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Ivakhiv, Adrian. 2006. “ Toward a Geography of Religion: Mapping the Distribution of an Unstable Signifier.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96 ( 1): 169– 75. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Jensen, Ole. 2013. Staging Mobilities . London: Routledge. Khalil, Moustafa. 2015. “ Faith-based Organizations and Civic Engagement in Egypt.” In Religion and Volunteering: Complex, Contested and Ambiguous Relationships , edited by Hustinx Lesley, Johan von Essen, Haers Jacques, and Mels Sara, 283– 304. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Kong, Lily. 2001. “ Mapping ‘New’ Geographies of Religion: Politics and Poetics in Modernity.” Progress in Human Geography 25 ( 2): 211– 33. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Kong, Lily. 2010. “ Theoretical Shifts, Global Shifts: Changing Geographies of Religion.” Progress in Human Geography 34 ( 6): 755– 76. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Kong, Lily, Hopkins Peter, and Olsen Elizabeth, eds. 2013. Religion and Place: Landscapes, Politics and Piety . New York: Springer. Lanz, Stephan. 2014. “ Assembling Global Prayers in the City: An Attempt to Repopulate Urban Theory with Religion.” In Global Prayers: Contemporary Manifestations of the Religious in the City , edited by Jochen Becker, Kingan Katrin, Stephan Lanz, and Wildner Kathrin, 17– 43. Berlin: Lars Müller Publishers. Lichterman, Paul. 2005. Elusive Togetherness: Church Groups Trying to Bridge America’s Divisions . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Lipsitz, George. 2011. How Racism Takes Place. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. McRoberts, Omar. 2003. Streets of Glory: Church and Community in a Black Urban Neighborhood . Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Molendijk, Arie, Beaumont Justin, and Jedan Christoph, eds. 2010. Exploring the Postsecular: The Religious, the Political and the Urban . Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Niedźwiedź, Anna. 2017. “ Framing the Pope within the Urban Space: John Paul II and the Cityscape of Krakow.” In Spiritualizing the City , edited by Hegner Victoria and Jan Margry Peter, 81– 101. London: Routledge. Novetzke, Christian. 2008. Religion and Public Memory . New York: Columbia University Press. Nyitray, Vivian-Lee. 2006. “ History, Memory, and Narrative Ethics.” Chinese Cross Currents 3 ( 2): 46– 65. Ong, Aihwa. 2011. “ Introduction: Worlding Cities or the Art of Being Global.” In Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global , edited by Roy Ananya and Ong Aihwa, 1– 26. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Orsi, Robert A. 1985. The Madonna of 115th Street: Faith and Community in Italian Harlem, 1880–1950 . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Orsi, Robert A, ed. 1999. Gods of the City: Religion and the American Urban Landscape . Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Orsi, Robert A. 2005. Between Heaven and Earth: The Religious Worlds People Make and the Scholars Who Study Them . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Osumare, Halifu. 2010a. “ Motherland Hip-Hop: African American Youth Culture in Senegal and Kenya.” In Rhythms of the Afro-Atlantic World: Rituals and Remembrances , edited by C. K. Ifeoma, Diouf Nwamkwo, and Diouf Mamadou, 161– 77. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Osumare, Halifu. 2010b. “ Sacred Dance/Drumming: Reciprocation & Contention within African Belief Systems in the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Area.” In Women and New and Africana Religions , edited by Lillian Ashcraft Eason, Martin Darnie, and Olademo Oyeronke, 123– 44. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger. Pena, Elaine A. 2011. Performing Piety: Making Space Sacred with the Virgin of Guadalupe . Berkeley: University of California Press. Pow, C. P. 2015. “ Urban Dystopia and Epistemologies of Hope.” Progress in Human Geography 39 ( 4): 464– 85. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Qasmiyeh, Yousif, and Elena Fiddian-Qasmiyeh. 2013. “ Refugee Camps and Cities in Conversation.” In Rescripting Religion in the City , edited by Garnett Jane and Harris Alana, 131– 43. London: Ashgate. Roberts, Allen F., and Mary Nooter Roberts. 2003. A Saint in the City: Sufi Arts of Urban Senegal . Los Angeles: UCLA Fowler Museum. Roberts, Allen F., and Mary Nooter Roberts. 2008. “ Mystical Graffiti and the Refabulation of Dakar.” Africa Today 54 ( 2): 50– 77. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Robinson, Jennifer. 2006. Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development . New York: Routledge. “Sacramento Diasporas Project” (Michael Rios, Project Director), Center for Regional Change, University of California, Davis. Available at http://explore.regionalchange.ucdavis.edu/ourwork/projects/sacramento-diasporas-project. Accessed April 21, 2017. Sadler, Simon. 2014. “ Neoliberal Millennialism.” Paper presented at Spirited Topographies symposium, University of California, Davis, CA, May 9. Schwenkel, Christina. 2009. The American War in Contemporary Vietnam: Transnational Remembrance and Representation . Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Schwenkel, Christina. 2012. “ Civilizing the City: Socialist Ruins and Urban Renewal in Central Vietnam.” positions: east asia cultures critique 20 ( 2): 437– 69. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Shacher, Itamar. 2015. “ Going Back to Our Values.” In Religion and Volunteering: Complex, Contested and Ambiguous Relationships , edited by Hustinx Lesley, von Essen Johan, Jacques Haers, and Mels Sara, 305– 28. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Simone, Abdou Maliq. 2004. For the City Yet to Come: Changing African Life in Four Cities . Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Srinivas, Smriti. 2001. Landscapes of Urban Memory: The Sacred and the Civic in India’s High-Tech City . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Srinivas, Smriti. 2008. In the Presence of Sai Baba: Body, City, and Memory in a Global Religious Movement . Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, and Hyderabad: Orient Longman. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Srinivas, Smriti. 2015. A Place for Utopia: Urban Designs from South Asia . Seattle: University of Washington Press, and Hyderabad: Orient BlackSwan. Stoll, David, and Garrard-Burnett Virginia, eds. 1993. Rethinking Protestantism in Latin America . Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Sutherland, Callum. 2017. “ Theography: Subject, Theology and Praxis in Geographies of Religion.” Progress in Human Geography 41 ( 3): 321– 37. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Tweed, Thomas. 2008. Crossing and Dwelling: A Theory of Religion . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Uberoi, J. P. S. 2002. The European Modernity: Science, Truth and Method . Delhi: Oxford University Press. Urbanizing Faith: Practices within Precarity ( Simone AbdouMaliq, editor). 2016. Available at http://www.abdoumaliqsimone.com/current-projects.html. Accessed January 8, 2016. The City as Living Laboratory ( Miss Mary, Artistic Director). 2016. Available at http://www.cityaslivinglab.org. Accessed January 8, 2016. The Urban Sacred ( Krech Volkar, Meyer Birgit, Knott Kim, editors). 2017. Available at http://www.urban-sacred.org. Accessed April 21, 2017. Urry, John. 2007. Mobilities . Cambridge: Polity Press. Varzi, Roxanne. 2006. Warring Souls: Youth, Media and Martyrdom in Post-Revolutionary Iran. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Vasquez, Manuel A., and Marie Friedmann Marquardt. 2003. Globalizing the Sacred: Religion across the Americas . New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Waghorne, Joanne. 2004. Diaspora of the Gods: Modern Hindu Temples in an Urban Middle-Class World . New York: Oxford University Press. Waghorne, Joanne, ed. 2016. Place/No Place: Spatial Aspects of Urban Asian Religiosity . Singapore: Asia Research Institute-Springer Asia Series. Weller, Robert. 2001. “ Living at the Edge: Religion, Capitalism, and the End of the Nation-State in Taiwan.” In Millennial Capitalism and the Culture of Neoliberalism , edited by Comaroff John and Comaroff Jean L., 215– 39. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Werbner, Pnina. 2003. Pilgrims of Love: The Anthropology of a Global Sufi Cult . Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Wheatley, Paul. 1971. The Pivot of the Four Quarters: A Preliminary Enquiry into the Origins and Character of the Ancient Chinese City . Chicago: Chicago University Press. Wilhelm-Solomon, Matthew, Nuñez Lorena, Kankonde-Bukasa Peter, and Malcomess Bettina, eds. 2017. Routes and Rites to the City: Mobility, Diversity and Religious Space in Johannesburg . London: Palgrave Macmillan. Footnotes 1 Regarding the ways that actors, understood as historically situated figures, may enable scholars to make sense of the urban as a “conglomeration of particularities as well as a space of structured relations of power,” see Barker, Harms, and Lindquist (2013). 2 Religiosity, in our usage, is meant to overcome the binary (common in colloquial and scholarly usage) that sometimes treats “religion” and “spirituality” as oppositional categories, with “religion” denoting a formal, institutionalized, and often textualized body of canonical practices and “spirituality” denoting a more individualized, idiosyncratic, and heterodox category (see also Engelke 2013, 38; Bender and McRoberts 2012, 2–3). For important recent efforts to reposition and broaden understandings of religion and the secular in relation to mobility, see Ivakhiv (2006) and Tweed (2008). © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Religion. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: email@example.com. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices)
Journal of the American Academy of Religion – Oxford University Press
Published: Jan 20, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera