Abstract In the final stage of oogenesis, mammalian oocytes generate a meiotic spindle and undergo chromosome segregation to yield an egg that is ready for fertilization. Herein, we describe the recent advances in understanding the mechanisms controlling formation of the meiotic spindle in metaphase I (MI) and metaphase II (MII) in mammalian oocytes, and focus on the differences between mouse and human oocytes. Unlike mitotic cells, mammalian oocytes lack typical centrosomes that consist of two centrioles and the surrounding pericentriolar matrix proteins, which serve as microtubule-organizing centers (MTOCs) in most somatic cells. Instead, oocytes rely on different mechanisms for the formation of microtubules in MI spindles. Two different mechanisms have been described for MI spindle formation in mammalian oocytes. Chromosome-mediated microtubule formation, including RAN-mediated spindle formation and chromosomal passenger complex-mediated spindle elongation, controls the growth of microtubules from chromatin, while acentriolar MTOC-mediated microtubule formation contributes to spindle formation. Mouse oocytes utilize both chromatin- and MTOC-mediated pathways for microtubule formation. The existence of both pathways may provide a fail-safe mechanism to ensure high fidelity of chromosome segregation during meiosis. Unlike mouse oocytes, human oocytes considered unsuitable for clinical in vitro fertilization procedures, lack MTOCs; this may explain why meiosis in human oocytes is often error-prone. Understanding the mechanisms of MI/MII spindle formation, spindle assembly checkpoint, and chromosome segregation, in mammalian oocytes, will provide valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms of human infertility. Introduction In the final stage of mammalian oocyte maturation, a meiotic spindle is formed within the oocyte, followed by segregation of bivalent chromosomes and extrusion of the first polar body . Error-free segregation of chromosomes during oocyte maturation is essential for the normal development of mammalian embryos after fertilization . Aneuploidy, caused by aberrant segregation of chromosomes, can lead to miscarriage or birth defects, such as trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) , trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome) , and trisomy 13 (Patau syndrome) . The mechanisms of age-related aneuploidy have been studied extensively using the mouse oocyte as a model system . Recent studies have shown that the mechanisms for spindle formation and chromosome segregation, in human oocytes, are distinct from those in mouse oocytes [7, 8]. Understanding the mechanisms of meiotic spindle formation in mammalian oocytes, particularly in humans, will provide valuable information for the development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for aneuploidy-caused infertility. In this review, we examine the mechanisms of meiotic spindle formation in mammalian oocytes and focus on the differences between these mechanisms in mouse and human oocytes. Additionally, we review the mechanistic aspects of meiotic spindle formation and examine the factors implicated in the development of spindle abnormalities and erroneous chromosome segregation. In later sections, we describe the roles of spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) and cohesin in regulating the fidelity of segregation and show that abnormalities in quality control mechanisms of chromosome segregation can result in aneuploidy. Finally, we address the importance of methods used to detect aneuploidy in oocytes, and those used to increase the success rate of assisted reproductive techniques such as in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Acentriolar spindle formation in mammalian oocytes In contrast to somatic cells, mouse and human oocytes do not contain typical centrosomes. A centrosome, which consists of two centrioles and the surrounding layers of pericentriolar matrix (PCM) [9–14], serves as the main microtubule-organizing center (MTOC) during spindle formation in mitotic cells . Instead, mammalian oocytes rely on several different mechanisms for acentriolar spindle formation [1, 16], as illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 1. View largeDownload slide Mechanisms of acentriolar spindle formation in mouse oocytes. During mouse oocyte maturation, acentriolar MTOCs undergo dynamic remodeling. In GV stage oocytes, MTOCs exist as large clusters, but are fragmented after GVBD. Bipolar spindles are reorganized by microtubule-based motors including plus-to-minus directed motor dynein and minus-to-plus directed kinesins. Mouse oocytes can generate microtubules from acentriolar MTOCs or chromatin. Acentriolar MTOCs contain several components in the pericentriolar material of somatic cells including PCNT, CEP192, CEP152, NEDD1, and TuRC. Several kinases that regulate the cell cycle, including PLK1 and CDK1, are involved in the regulation of acentriolar MTOCs (details in Figure 2). RAN-specific GTP exchange factor, RCC1, binds to chromatin and converts RAN-GTP to RAN-GDP gradient towards chromatin. RAN-GTP activates TPX2, which, in turn, recruits the AURKA to the spindle. AURKA activates NEDD1 and TuRC, and initiates microtubule nucleation. The chromosome passenger complex, Aurora B/C-mediated phosphorylation of MCAK, or STMN1, inhibits the shrinkage of microtubules, thereby promoting their growth (adapted from ). Figure 1. View largeDownload slide Mechanisms of acentriolar spindle formation in mouse oocytes. During mouse oocyte maturation, acentriolar MTOCs undergo dynamic remodeling. In GV stage oocytes, MTOCs exist as large clusters, but are fragmented after GVBD. Bipolar spindles are reorganized by microtubule-based motors including plus-to-minus directed motor dynein and minus-to-plus directed kinesins. Mouse oocytes can generate microtubules from acentriolar MTOCs or chromatin. Acentriolar MTOCs contain several components in the pericentriolar material of somatic cells including PCNT, CEP192, CEP152, NEDD1, and TuRC. Several kinases that regulate the cell cycle, including PLK1 and CDK1, are involved in the regulation of acentriolar MTOCs (details in Figure 2). RAN-specific GTP exchange factor, RCC1, binds to chromatin and converts RAN-GTP to RAN-GDP gradient towards chromatin. RAN-GTP activates TPX2, which, in turn, recruits the AURKA to the spindle. AURKA activates NEDD1 and TuRC, and initiates microtubule nucleation. The chromosome passenger complex, Aurora B/C-mediated phosphorylation of MCAK, or STMN1, inhibits the shrinkage of microtubules, thereby promoting their growth (adapted from ). Chromatin-mediated formation of microtubules in the mitotic spindle has been well characterized by studies using Xenopus oocyte and human mitotic cell extracts as model systems [17–20]. The small GTPase RAN (Ras-related nuclear protein) is involved in nuclear transport and regulation of nucleus-related biochemical processes . RAN exists in the GTP- or GDP-bound form; RAN-GDP is converted to RAN-GTP by the RAN guanine nucleotide exchange factor called regulator of chromosome condensation 1 (RCC1) , which is bound to chromatin. This GDP/GTP exchange activity of RCC1 generates a RAN-GTP gradient from chromatin . The RAN-GTP gradient induces activation of spindle assembly factors  including TPX2 . TPX2 targets the Aurora-A kinase (AURKA) to the spindle and recruits the tubulin ring complex (TuRC), which initiates microtubule nucleation at the spindle poles. The role of chromatin-based RAN-GTP gradient-dependent formation of microtubules has been intensively studied in mouse and human oocytes [7, 25]. In mouse oocytes, the inactivation of the RAN-GTP gradient, by the expression of dominant-negative or constitutively active RAN mutants, does not inhibit the formation of the meiotic spindle , indicating that RAN-mediated nucleation of microtubules is not essential for meiotic spindle formation. Instead, RAN-mediated generation of microtubules is involved in the later stages of microtubule formation, after the initial formation of microtubules from acentriolar MTOCs . This suggests that TPX2, which is a RAN-controlled spindle assembly factor, is also involved in meiotic spindle formation in mice , indicating that RAN-mediated assembly of the spindle occurs in mouse oocytes. Recently, mouse oocytes lacking functional MTOCs have been shown to generate microtubules. However, these MTOC-devoid oocytes show differences in spindle assembly and erroneous chromosome attachment associated with increased aneuploidy and female subfertility . This indicates that acentriolar MTOC-mediated microtubule assembly is required for normal spindle formation. However, RAN-mediated formation of microtubules can compensate for the absence of MTOC-mediated assembly of microtubules to a certain extent. Therefore, the existence of both acentriolar MTOC-mediated and RAN-mediated pathways for microtubule assembly in mouse oocytes may provide a fail-safe mechanism to ensure fidelity of chromosome segregation during female meiosis. In contrast to mouse oocytes, human oocytes utilize RAN-GTP-mediated microtubule formation as an essential pathway for meiotic metaphase I (MI) spindle assembly. Expression of a dominant-negative RAN mutant protein (T24N) prevents spindle assembly in human oocytes, which reportedly lack acentriolar MTOC-associated proteins (discussed in the later sections) . Another mechanism for chromatin-mediated microtubule nucleation involves the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) , which consists of scaffolding protein inner centromere protein (INCENP), Aurora B protein kinase (AURKB), and centromere targeting proteins baculoviral IAP repeat-containing protein 5 (BIRC5, also known as survivin) and Cell division cycle-associated protein 8 (CDCA8, also known as Borealin). CPC induces a gradient of AURKB activity emanating from chromatin . The pool of activated AURKB phosphorylates and inactivates microtubule-destabilizing proteins including mitotic centromere-associated kinesin (MCAK)  and stathmin (STMN1) . Consequently, CPC can induce microtubule nucleation at the kinetochore . Depletion of INCENP in mouse oocytes results in chromosome misalignment, which demonstrates the importance of CPC in error-free chromosome segregation . In mouse oocytes, MCAK is localized at the centromere. A loss-of-function study on MCAK showed an arrest at the MI stage and defects in chromosome congression and spindle bipolarity, which indicates that MCAK is involved in the formation of the MI spindle . Perturbation of AURKB and aurora C protein kinase (AURKC) impairs meiotic spindle assembly . AURKC is regulated by the kinase HASPIN. Inhibition of HASPIN activity impairs clustering of MTOCs at the ends of the bipolar spindle; overexpression of AURKC corrects defects in the clustering of MTOCs mediated by HASPIN . Few studies tested the role of CPC in development of aneuploidy in human oocytes. A recent study linked single-nucleotide polymorphisms in AURKB and AURKC with human aneuploidy . Acentriolar microtubule-organizing centers and spindle formation in mammalian oocytes The acentriolar MTOCs were discovered in mouse oocytes in the 1970s [9–14]. However, the exact roles of MTOCs in meiotic spindle formation and acentriolar MTOC composition remain unclear. In mitotic cells, a pair of centrioles is surrounded by various pericentriolar proteins including pericentrin (PCNT), neural precursor cell expressed developmentally down-regulated protein 1 (NEDD1), centrosomal protein of 120 kDa (CEP120), centrosomal protein of 152 kDa (CEP152), CDK5 regulatory subunit-associated protein 2 (CDK5RAP2), and centrosomal protein of 192 kDa . The components of the PCM are essential for the recruitment of TuRC, which initiates the formation of new microtubule filaments . The molecular composition and organization of acentriolar MTOCs in oocytes are not completely understood. Many PCM proteins, such as PCNT , gamma-tubulin (TUBG1) , NEDD1 , centrin-1 (CENT1) , nuclear mitotic apparatus protein (NuMA) , cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A protein (CIP2A) , CEP192, and CEP152 , are common to the mitotic centrosome and meiotic MTOCs. However, their mechanistic roles in the formation of microtubules and MTOCs are unknown. During maturation of mouse oocytes, acentriolar MTOCs undergo spatial reorganization. In mouse oocytes that are at the germinal vesicle (GV) stage, MTOCs exist as large clusters surrounding the GV [26, 46, 47]. Just before GV breakdown (GVBD), MTOCs extend along the nuclear membrane of oocytes. After GVBD, MTOCs are fragmented into small foci, which are followed by microtubule nucleation from MTOCs. During maturation of mouse oocytes, a network of approximately 80 MTOCs self-organizes to both ends of the spindle, forming a bipolar spindle, by the combined actions of microtubule motor proteins like kinesin heavy chain isoform 5A (KIF5A) and dynein (discussed in a later section), as illustrated in Figure 2 [26, 46, 47]. Figure 2. View largeDownload slide PCM materials and kinases involved in remodeling of acentriolar MTOCs. During maturation of mouse oocytes, acentriolar MTOCs undergo several remodeling steps. In the GV stages, MTOCs exist as a cluster; however, the cluster is extended and fragmented after GVBD. MTOCs mediate the formation of microtubules, and dynein is involved in the remodeling of MTOCs. CEP192 (marked in green) is present in MTOCs at all stages of oocyte maturation, while CEP152 is only present in MTOCs in the GV stage . CIP2A, a component of MTOCs, is present in MTOCs after GVBD . During spindle formation, MTOCs are self-organized to both ends of the spindles by the action of kinesins, which results in the formation of bipolar spindles. Several other protein kinases are involved in the control of these processes, including PLK1, AURKA, and CDK1 (adapted from ). Figure 2. View largeDownload slide PCM materials and kinases involved in remodeling of acentriolar MTOCs. During maturation of mouse oocytes, acentriolar MTOCs undergo several remodeling steps. In the GV stages, MTOCs exist as a cluster; however, the cluster is extended and fragmented after GVBD. MTOCs mediate the formation of microtubules, and dynein is involved in the remodeling of MTOCs. CEP192 (marked in green) is present in MTOCs at all stages of oocyte maturation, while CEP152 is only present in MTOCs in the GV stage . CIP2A, a component of MTOCs, is present in MTOCs after GVBD . During spindle formation, MTOCs are self-organized to both ends of the spindles by the action of kinesins, which results in the formation of bipolar spindles. Several other protein kinases are involved in the control of these processes, including PLK1, AURKA, and CDK1 (adapted from ). CEP192 is one of the core PCM proteins [48–51], which serves as a scaffold protein and recruits several other PCM proteins including polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4), polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), CEP152, and centrosome protein 63 kDa (CEP63) [52, 53]. In mouse oocytes, PCNT and CEP192 are localized to the MTOCs during all stages of oocyte maturation. Depletion of CEP192 by RNAi impairs MTOC formation, delays microtubule spindle assembly, and causes chromosome misalignment. However, it does not completely inhibit formation of meiotic spindle . Similar events are observed in mouse oocytes with depleted PCNT , indicating that MTOC-mediated microtubule formation is necessary for maintaining high fidelity of chromosome segregation. During oocyte maturation, acentriolar MTOCs undergo dynamic remodeling, which involves stretching along the nuclear membrane at the GV stage, fragmentation after GVBD, and self-organization at the spindle poles [26, 47]. PCNT and CEP192 are persistently localized to MTOCs during all stages of oocyte development; however, the localization of CEP152is restricted to the GV stage. CEP152 is rapidly delocalized from MTOCs after GVBD , which is CEP152 linked to subsequent MTOC fragmentation. For example, inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) activity causes retention of CEP152 on MTOCs even after GVBD, indicating that CDK1 activity is linked to CEP152 displacement. The knockdown of CEP152 causes premature fragmentation of MTOCs, which indicates that CEP152 is involved in the clustering and fragmentation of MTOCs. In somatic cells, the recruitment of CEP152 to MTOCs depends on PLK4. However, in mouse oocytes, the expression of CEP152, lacking the N-terminal PLK4 binding site, does not alter the localization of CEP152. This indicates that CEP152 localization at the GV stage is independent of PLK4 and demonstrates that acentriolar MTOCs and PCM differ in somatic cells wherein PLK4 is critical in centriole duplication. In addition to CEP192 and CEP152, CIP2A has been identified as a new component of acentriolar MTOCs in oocytes . In contrast to previous reports showing that CIP2A is an inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) [54, 55], overexpression of CIP2A did not inhibit PP2A activity , which is essential for the meiotic maturation of oocytes . Instead, CIP2A is localized to MTOCs. Interestingly, CIP2A does not localize to MTOCs in the GV stage, but rather after GVBD. This localization differs from that of CEP152, which is localized at MTOC during the GV stage, but extruded from MTOC after GVBD . Similar to the results for CEP192, the knockdown of CIP2A causes depletion of MTOCs, which indicates that CIP2A is essential for maintaining MTOCs. The sequential recruitment of CEP152 and CIP2A to acentriolar MTOCs indicates that the two proteins may compete with each other to bind to CEP192. The detailed mechanistic roles of CIP2A, in the formation of acentriolar MTOCs, require further analysis. Several kinases have been implicated in controlling the spatial reorganization of MTOCs and recruiting various PCM proteins in oocytes. For example, PLK1 plays several roles in cell-cycle control and spindle formation in oocytes, participating in meiotic resumption, anaphase transition, and remodeling of acentriolar MTOC [45, 47, 57]. Chemical inhibition of PLK1 activity, in mouse oocytes, impairs fragmentation of MTOCs after GVBD  and eventually causes the depletion of MTOCs [45, 57], demonstrating the importance of PLK1 in oocyte maturation. In mitotic cells, PLK1 phosphorylates CEP192, which is a key component of the PCM layer and acentriolar MTOCs . In addition to CEP192 phosphorylation, PLK1 is implicated in the phosphorylation of CIP2A . PLK1 and AURKA reciprocally facilitate their localization on MTOC and recruit TuRC to CEP192 . Aside from recruiting AURKA and TuRC, the exact mechanistic role of PLK1 in spatial reorganization of acentriolar MTOCs in oocytes remains unclear. A recent study on in vitro reconstitution using PCM proteins from Caenorhabditis elegans embryos showed that centriolar proteins can form condensed, phase-separated spherical structures under conditions of macromolecular crowding . This indicates that PLK1 facilitates the formation of a phase-separated structure and can facilitate microtubule formation . A similar phase-separated formation of CEP192 and pericentriolar material may occur during the dynamic remodeling of MTOCs in mammalian oocytes, particularly during self-organization of the PCM to both ends of the meiotic spindles. However, detailed mechanism of this process and PCM composition require further analyses. In addition to kinases, several microtubule motor proteins have been implicated in spatial reorganization of MTOCs to spindle poles. For example, a minus-end directed microtubule motor dynein  is involved in the initial fragmentation of MTOCs at the onset of GVBD [47, 60, 61]. Inhibition of activity of another motor protein, KIF5A, impairs clustering and bipolarization of MTOCs [26, 62] indicates that microtubule motor proteins play important role in meiotic spindle formation. In summary, formation of meiotic spindle in mouse oocytes represents a robust mechanism for accurate chromosome segregation. Do human oocytes lack microtubule-organizing center-mediated spindle formation? Several important differences in MI spindle formation between mouse and human oocytes were observed in a recent study . As illustrated in Figure 3, human oocytes considered unsuitable for clinical IVF procedures lack detectable acentriolar MTOC markers including PCNT and gamma-tubulin. Instead of utilizing the acentriolar MTOC-mediated microtubule formation pathway, spindle formation in human oocytes relies entirely on RAN-GTP mediated and chromatin-mediated formation of microtubules. The expression of dominant-negative RAN mutants in oocytes completely inhibits formation of the meiotic spindle. The opposite holds true in mouse oocytes in which RAN-mediated nucleation of microtubules is not essential for the formation of MI spindle [25, 26]. Thus, the expression of dominant-negative RAN mutants only delays microtubule formation in its later stage. Notably, the completion of MI spindle formation (16 h) in human oocytes requires considerably longer time compared to mouse oocytes (3–5 h). Prolonged MI spindle formation in human oocytes can be mimicked by mouse oocytes by depleting MTOCs via knocking down PCNT  or CEP192 . Acentriolar MTOC-mediated spindle formation is required for the robust and error-free chromosomes segregation in mouse oocytes. SAC fails to detect spindle abnormalities in mammalian oocytes and gives rise to the development of aneuploidy. This is described in detail in the subsequent section. Figure 3. View largeDownload slide Comparing the time course of meiotic spindle formation in human and mouse oocytes. Considerable differences are found in the spindle formation of mouse and human oocytes. The human oocytes were obtained from patients with infertility ; therefore, they may not represent the healthy status of the human oocyte. Under conditions of in vitro maturation, the maturation of mouse oocytes is typically completed in 12 h, and mature MII oocytes are formed. In humans, the maturation of MII oocytes requires more than 24 h. A major difference in oocyte maturation, between the two organisms, is the time required to generate the meiotic spindles. In mouse oocytes, microtubule nucleation can occur via MTOC- and RAN-mediated pathways, while only RAN-GTP-mediated pathway is involved in microtubule formation in human oocytes. Loss-of-function studies, examining MTOC components of mouse oocytes, show reduced chromosome segregation, indicating that the pathway of microtubule formation is essential for the robust formation of meiotic spindles in mouse oocytes. Stages for microtubule formation by MTOC are indicated in violet and Ran-mediated pathway is indicated in yellow (adapted from [1, 7]). Figure 3. View largeDownload slide Comparing the time course of meiotic spindle formation in human and mouse oocytes. Considerable differences are found in the spindle formation of mouse and human oocytes. The human oocytes were obtained from patients with infertility ; therefore, they may not represent the healthy status of the human oocyte. Under conditions of in vitro maturation, the maturation of mouse oocytes is typically completed in 12 h, and mature MII oocytes are formed. In humans, the maturation of MII oocytes requires more than 24 h. A major difference in oocyte maturation, between the two organisms, is the time required to generate the meiotic spindles. In mouse oocytes, microtubule nucleation can occur via MTOC- and RAN-mediated pathways, while only RAN-GTP-mediated pathway is involved in microtubule formation in human oocytes. Loss-of-function studies, examining MTOC components of mouse oocytes, show reduced chromosome segregation, indicating that the pathway of microtubule formation is essential for the robust formation of meiotic spindles in mouse oocytes. Stages for microtubule formation by MTOC are indicated in violet and Ran-mediated pathway is indicated in yellow (adapted from [1, 7]). One of the limitations in the Holubcova et al study is that the collected human oocytes were ovulated, but did not resume meiosis nor did they undergo GVBD or progress to the MII stage even after hormonal stimulation for IVF . Hence, it is possible that such oocytes may not fully represent mechanisms of meiotic spindle formation in healthy human oocytes. Therefore, it is necessary to compare oocytes collected from healthy donors in order to confirm the absence of MTOCs in human oocytes. The mechanism of spindle formation in oocytes and pre-implantation embryos is evolutionarily diverse among mammals [10, 43, 63]. Acentriolar MTOCs have not been observed in human and porcine oocytes [7, 43]. In bovine oocytes, gamma-tubulin is observed at spindle poles and in the cytoplasm, which is consistent with the localization in mouse oocytes  and implies the presence of acentriolar MTOCs in bovine oocytes. Similar to oocytes, early mouse embryos until the blastocyst stage also utilize acentriolar MTOCs for mitotic spindle assembly [64, 65]. However, in human embryos as well as in most other mammals, a centriole from the sperm is responsible for the mitotic spindle formation of . This demonstrates the diversity of acentriolar MTOC-mediated spindle formation in mammalian oocytes and early embryos. Collectively, microtubule nucleation pathway using MTOCs is important in maintaining the high fidelity of chromosome segregation during MI. Spindle assembly checkpoint in oocytes SAC prevents premature progression of the cell cycle until the kinetochores are attached to the mitotic spindle and are under tension [67, 68]. In the mitotic cell, the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) consists of mitotic arrest deficient protein 2 (MAD2), mitotic checkpoint serine/threonine-protein kinase BUB1 beta (BUB1B), and mitotic checkpoint protein BUB3 (BUB3) in complex with cell division cycle protein 20 (CDC20) . When kinetochores are not attached to the mitotic spindle, the MCC inhibits the activity of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), which is a ubiquitin ligase, and prevents the degradation of cyclin-B1 (CCNB1) and Pituitary tumor-transforming gene 1 (PTTG1, also known as securin). The MCC is assembled by the outer kinetochore KMN network . Kinetochores that are not attached to microtubules act as “catalytic platforms” to generate the MCC. The MCC inhibits the activity of APC/C, and cell-cycle progression is suspended until the kinetochores are attached . The lack of tension, caused by merotelic or syntelic attachment, activates AURKB and induces SAC activation . After kinetochores are correctly attached to the mitotic spindle, MCC dissociates from APC/C, which then mediates degradation of PTTG. This results in activation of extra spindle poles-like 1 (ESPL1, also known as seperase) that degrades cohesin and eventually initiates chromosome segregation . In mouse oocytes, the presence of the different components of SAC, including BUB1R , MAD2 , mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint protein MAD1 (MAD1) , dual specificity protein kinase TTK (also known as MPS1) , kinetochore protein SPC25 (SPC25) , and BUB3 , has been confirmed. This indicates the presence of SAC activity and prevention of premature anaphase transition before the attachment of kinetochores to the spindle. However, several studies on mouse oocytes have shown that reduced SAC activity tolerates unattached chromosomes. For example, mouse oocytes, lacking a functional NuMA protein, generate highly disorganized spindles and show defects in chromosome alignment. However, the SAC is not silenced and anaphase progresses even in the presence of one or few unattached chromosomes . Similarly, oocytes with depleted PCNT or CEP192 [28, 45], or those treated with a PLK1 inhibitor BI2536 , show defects in chromosome alignment, aneuploidy, or fertility. These results indicate that SAC in mammalian oocytes is not robust enough to prevent all chromosome segregation errors. Why do mammalian oocytes have inherently reduced SAC activity compared with mitotic cells? A recent study shows that a particularly large volume of mammalian oocytes (mouse and human oocytes with a diameter of 80 and 120 μm, respectively) is directly responsible for reduced SAC activity . The amount of MCC components localized in the germinal vesicle may be thus the limiting factor in SAC activity  as is the case in the C. elegans embryos . Age-related decrease in the SAC activity of human oocytes may explain the increased incidence of age-related aneuploidy. Messenger RNA levels of certain SAC genes in human oocytes decrease with age . An age-dependent decrease in levels of BUB1 and BUBR1 in the kinetochores of human oocytes has been reported . It suggests that SAC activity decreases with advanced age and contributes to increased incidence of aneuploidy. However, the rate of premature anaphase transition in oocytes obtained from aged mice does not increase considerably despite the increased incidence of aneuploidy . This suggests that SAC activity is not related to increased incidence of aneuploidy in mouse oocytes. These discrepancies in age-dependent SAC activity in mouse and human oocytes may shed light on the differences between human and rodent oocytes. Further investigation of SAC activity in the human oocyte will help understand the exact role of the limited SAC activity in preventing human aneuploidy. Cohesins and chromosome segregation errors After the alignment of chromosomes and movement of the spindle towards the cortex are completed, the anaphase–telophase transition proceeds and the first polar body is extruded. For anaphase I transition, the cohesin complex, which forms the complex between sister chromatids and homologous chromosomes, undergoes degradation by ESPL1 in chromosome arm, facilitating separation of the homologous chromosomes . The centromeric cohesin links sister chromatids and is protected from degradation by shugoshin (SGO2) to maintain the diploidy of chromosomes after meiosis I [88, 89]. The mechanisms of PTTG1/ESPL1 activity and their relationship with APC/C and maturation promoting factor have been reviewed previously . Mutations in the meiosis-specific cohesin subunit gene, cohesin Smb1, lead to infertility in male and female mice [90, 91]. The levels of centromere cohesin on chromosomes at MI stage oocyte are reduced by depletion of centromere cohesion protection protein shugoshin 2 (SGO2) [92–94] in oocytes of aged mice, indicating a strong correlation between age-dependent decrease in cohesin levels and increased incidence of aneuploidy. Depletion of SGO2 in aged mice causes premature separation of sister chromatids . The levels of cohesin in oocytes obtained from aged human donors are considerably lower than those in oocytes from young donors [85, 95], indicating a relationship between reduced levels of cohesin and age-related aneuploidy. However, whether the loss of cohesin is directly related to increased incidence of aneuploidy in human oocytes remains unclear . More than 60% of sister kinetochores in oocytes obtained from young human donors are physically separated from each other, indicating compromised centromere cohesion . This contrasts with mouse oocytes in which each pair of sister kinetochores is properly attached . The fraction of separated kinetochores in human oocytes increases with age so that 87% kinetochores in human oocytes from donors over 35 years are separated. This suggests that increased incidence of aneuploidy is caused by merotelic kinetochore attachments . Considering that the oocytes used in this study were immature and obtained from infertile patients, the observed differences may not conclusively reflect the differences between human and mouse oocytes. Clinical implications of spindle abnormalities in human oocytes As described above, aberrant spindle formation during meiosis I may be the direct cause of aneuploidy. The analysis of MII spindle in human oocytes will provide valuable information on the developmental competence of oocytes, which will improve the success rate of IVF in clinical practice. Because of its invasive nature and requirements for fixation and staining, immunofluorescence confocal microscopy, which is used to characterize the structure of the meiotic MII spindle, cannot be used for oocyte selection in clinical IVF procedures. This highlights the need for noninvasive methods for observing the structure of the MII spindle in live human oocytes. One such method is polarized light microscopy (poloscope) , which utilizes birefringence generated by spindle microtubules. However, studies comparing confocal microscopy and the use of the poloscope showed that current poloscope-based methods provide limited information on spindle abnormalities that may lead to developmental problems [98–100]. A newer, noninvasive microscopic technique called holotomography utilizes refractive index for intrinsic image contrast  and may potentially be used to observe MII spindle. Another clinical consideration comprises cryopreservation and thawing of human oocytes during IVF procedures. These procedures are usually conducted to preserve female fertility before the rapid decline of fecundity by the age 30 and above [102, 103]. Since cold treatment depolymerizes microtubules , oocyte cryopreservation and thawing can lead to meiotic spindle damage . A recent study showed that slow freezing (vitrification) of oocytes results in abnormal spindle morphology , which highlights the importance of noninvasive diagnostic methods for spindle morphology analyses in IVF procedures. Conclusions Recent studies on meiotic spindle formation in mammalian oocytes have provided a wealth of information on the molecular mechanisms driving the increased incidence of aneuploidy in human females of advanced maternal age. However, many of these studies used model organisms, particularly mice, which limits their clinical relevance. Studies of spindle assembly mechanisms have revealed potential differences between mouse and human oocytes, including the lack of acentriolar MTOC formation in human oocytes of limited quality. This indicates the importance of conducting comparative studies using human and mouse oocytes. In conclusion, understanding the mechanisms of spindle formation in mammalian oocytes and their links to aneuploidy would improve diagnosis and treatment of aneuploidy-related infertility. Footnotes † Grant support: This work was supported by grants from the Next Generation BioGreen 21 Program of the Rural Developmental Administration, Republic of Korea to SN (PJ011206) and NHK (PJ011126). Notes Edited by Dr. Lane K. Christenson, PhD, University of Kansas Medical Center References 1. Clift D, Schuh M. Restarting life: fertilization and the transition from meiosis to mitosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2013; 14: 549– 562. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 2. Jones KT, Lane SI. Molecular causes of aneuploidy in mammalian eggs. Development 2013; 140: 3719– 3730. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 3. Hulten MA, Patel SD, Tankimanova M, Westgren M, Papadogiannakis N, Jonsson AM, Iwarsson E. On the origin of trisomy 21 Down syndrome. Mol Cytogenet 2008; 1: 21. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 4. Cereda A, Carey JC. The trisomy 18 syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2012; 7: 81. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 5. Patau K, Smith DW, Therman E, Inhorn SL, Wagner HP. Multiple congenital anomaly caused by an extra autosome. Lancet 1960; 1: 790– 793. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 6. Jones KT. Meiosis in oocytes: predisposition to aneuploidy and its increased incidence with age. Hum Reprod Update 2008; 14: 143– 158. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 7. Holubcova Z, Blayney M, Elder K, Schuh M. Human oocytes. Error-prone chromosome-mediated spindle assembly favors chromosome segregation defects in human oocytes. Science 2015; 348: 1143– 1147. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 8. Zielinska AP, Holubcova Z, Blayney M, Elder K, Schuh M. Sister kinetochore splitting and precocious disintegration of bivalents could explain the maternal age effect. Elife 2015; 4: e11389. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 9. Szollosi D, Calarco P, Donahue RP. Absence of centrioles in the first and second meiotic spindles of mouse oocytes. J Cell Sci 1972; 11: 521– 541. Google Scholar PubMed 10. Calarco-Gillam PD, Siebert MC, Hubble R, Mitchison T, Kirschner M. Centrosome development in early mouse embryos as defined by an autoantibody against pericentriolar material. Cell 1983; 35: 621– 629. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 11. Schatten G, Simerly C, Schatten H. Microtubule configurations during fertilization, mitosis, and early development in the mouse and the requirement for egg microtubule-mediated motility during mammalian fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985; 82: 4152– 4156. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 12. Schatten H, Schatten G, Mazia D, Balczon R, Simerly C. Behavior of centrosomes during fertilization and cell division in mouse oocytes and in sea urchin eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1986; 83: 105– 109. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 13. Schatten G, Simerly C, Schatten H. Maternal inheritance of centrosomes in mammals? Studies on parthenogenesis and polyspermy in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88: 6785– 6789. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 14. Gueth-Hallonet C, Antony C, Aghion J, Santa-Maria A, Lajoie-Mazenc I, Wright M, Maro B. gamma-Tubulin is present in acentriolar MTOCs during early mouse development. J Cell Sci 1993; 105 ( Pt 1): 157– 166. Google Scholar PubMed 15. Doxsey S, McCollum D, Theurkauf W. Centrosomes in cellular regulation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2005; 21: 411– 434. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 16. Bennabi I, Terret ME, Verlhac MH. Meiotic spindle assembly and chromosome segregation in oocytes. J Cell Biol 2016; 215: 611– 619. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 17. Carazo-Salas RE, Guarguaglini G, Gruss OJ, Segref A, Karsenti E, Mattaj IW. Generation of GTP-bound Ran by RCC1 is required for chromatin-induced mitotic spindle formation. Nature 1999; 400: 178– 181. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 18. Kalab P, Pu RT, Dasso M. The ran GTPase regulates mitotic spindle assembly. Curr Biol 1999; 9: 481– 484. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 19. Zhang C, Clarke PR. Roles of Ran-GTP and Ran-GDP in precursor vesicle recruitment and fusion during nuclear envelope assembly in a human cell-free system. Curr Biol 2001; 11: 208– 212. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 20. Moore W, Zhang C, Clarke PR. Targeting of RCC1 to chromosomes is required for proper mitotic spindle assembly in human cells. Curr Biol 2002; 12: 1442– 1447. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 21. Clarke PR, Zhang C. Spatial and temporal coordination of mitosis by Ran GTPase. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008; 9: 464– 477. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 22. Kalab P, Weis K, Heald R. Visualization of a Ran-GTP gradient in interphase and mitotic Xenopus egg extracts. Science 2002; 295: 2452– 2456. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 23. Prosser SL, Pelletier L. Mitotic spindle assembly in animal cells: a fine balancing act. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2017; 18: 187– 201. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 24. Gruss OJ, Wittmann M, Yokoyama H, Pepperkok R, Kufer T, Sillje H, Karsenti E, Mattaj IW, Vernos I. Chromosome-induced microtubule assembly mediated by TPX2 is required for spindle formation in HeLa cells. Nat Cell Biol 2002; 4: 871– 879. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 25. Dumont J, Petri S, Pellegrin F, Terret ME, Bohnsack MT, Rassinier P, Georget V, Kalab P, Gruss OJ, Verlhac MH. A centriole- and RanGTP-independent spindle assembly pathway in meiosis I of vertebrate oocytes. J Cell Biol 2007; 176: 295– 305. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 26. Schuh M, Ellenberg J. Self-organization of MTOCs replaces centrosome function during acentrosomal spindle assembly in live mouse oocytes. Cell 2007; 130: 484– 498. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 27. Brunet S, Dumont J, Lee KW, Kinoshita K, Hikal P, Gruss OJ, Maro B, Verlhac MH. Meiotic regulation of TPX2 protein levels governs cell cycle progression in mouse oocytes. PLoS One 2008; 3: e3338. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 28. Baumann C, Wang X, Yang L, Viveiros MM. Error-prone meiotic division and subfertility in mice with oocyte-conditional knockdown of pericentrin. J Cell Sci 2017; 130: 1251– 1262. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 29. Carmena M, Wheelock M, Funabiki H, Earnshaw WC. The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC): from easy rider to the godfather of mitosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2012; 13: 789– 803. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 30. Fuller BG, Lampson MA, Foley EA, Rosasco-Nitcher S, Le KV, Tobelmann P, Brautigan DL, Stukenberg PT, Kapoor TM. Midzone activation of aurora B in anaphase produces an intracellular phosphorylation gradient. Nature 2008; 453: 1132– 1136. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 31. Lan W, Zhang X, Kline-Smith SL, Rosasco SE, Barrett-Wilt GA, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF, Walczak CE, Stukenberg PT. Aurora B phosphorylates centromeric MCAK and regulates its localization and microtubule depolymerization activity. Curr Biol 2004; 14: 273– 286. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 32. Gadea BB, Ruderman JV. Aurora B is required for mitotic chromatin-induced phosphorylation of Op18/Stathmin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 4493– 4498. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 33. Sharif B, Na J, Lykke-Hartmann K, McLaughlin SH, Laue E, Glover DM, Zernicka-Goetz M. The chromosome passenger complex is required for fidelity of chromosome transmission and cytokinesis in meiosis of mouse oocytes. J Cell Sci 2010; 123: 4292– 4300. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 34. Vogt E, Sanhaji M, Klein W, Seidel T, Wordeman L, Eichenlaub-Ritter U. MCAK is present at centromeres, midspindle and chiasmata and involved in silencing of the spindle assembly checkpoint in mammalian oocytes. Mol Hum Reprod 2010; 16: 665– 684. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 35. Balboula AZ, Schindler K. Selective disruption of aurora C kinase reveals distinct functions from aurora B kinase during meiosis in mouse oocytes. PLoS Genet 2014; 10: e1004194. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 36. Balboula AZ, Nguyen AL, Gentilello AS, Quartuccio SM, Drutovic D, Solc P, Schindler K. Haspin kinase regulates microtubule-organizing center clustering and stability through Aurora kinase C in mouse oocytes. J Cell Sci 2016; 129: 3648– 3660. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 37. Nguyen AL, Marin D, Zhou A, Gentilello AS, Smoak EM, Cao Z, Fedick A, Wang Y, Taylor D, Scott RT, Xing J, Treff N et al. Identification and characterization of Aurora Kinase B and C variants associated with maternal aneuploidy. Mol Hum Reprod 2017; 23: 406– 416. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 38. Conduit PT, Wainman A, Raff JW. Centrosome function and assembly in animal cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2015; 16: 611– 624. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 39. Kollman JM, Merdes A, Mourey L, Agard DA. Microtubule nucleation by gamma-tubulin complexes. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011; 12: 709– 721. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 40. Carabatsos MJ, Combelles CM, Messinger SM, Albertini DF. Sorting and reorganization of centrosomes during oocyte maturation in the mouse. Microsc Res Tech 2000; 49: 435– 444. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 41. Ma W, Baumann C, Viveiros MM. NEDD1 is crucial for meiotic spindle stability and accurate chromosome segregation in mammalian oocytes. Dev Biol 2010; 339: 439– 450. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 42. Manandhar G, Feng D, Yi YJ, Lai L, Letko J, Laurincik J, Sutovsky M, Salisbury JL, Prather RS, Schatten H, Sutovsky P. Centrosomal protein centrin is not detectable during early pre-implantation development but reappears during late blastocyst stage in porcine embryos. Reproduction 2006; 132: 423– 434. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 43. Lee J, Miyano T, Moor RM. Spindle formation and dynamics of gamma-tubulin and nuclear mitotic apparatus protein distribution during meiosis in pig and mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod 2000; 62: 1184– 1192. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 44. Wang H, Choe MH, Lee IW, Namgoong S, Kim JS, Kim NH, Oh JS. CIP2A acts as a scaffold for CEP192-mediated MTOC assembly by recruiting Plk1 and Aurora A during meiotic maturation. Development 201; 144: 3829– 3839. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS 45. Lee IW, Jo YJ, Jung SM, Wang HY, Kim NH, Namgoong S. Distinct roles of Cep192 and Cep152 in acentriolar MTOCs and spindle formation during mouse oocyte maturation. FASEB J 2018; 32 (In press). 46. Maro B, Howlett SK, Webb M. Non-spindle microtubule organizing centers in metaphase II-arrested mouse oocytes. J Cell Biol 1985; 101: 1665– 1672. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 47. Clift D, Schuh M. A three-step MTOC fragmentation mechanism facilitates bipolar spindle assembly in mouse oocytes. Nat Commun 2015; 6: 7217. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 48. Delattre M, Canard C, Gonczy P. Sequential protein recruitment in C. elegans centriole formation. Curr Biol 2006; 16: 1844– 1849. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 49. Gomez-Ferreria MA, Rath U, Buster DW, Chanda SK, Caldwell JS, Rines DR, Sharp DJ. Human Cep192 is required for mitotic centrosome and spindle assembly. Curr Biol 2007; 17: 1960– 1966. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 50. Dzhindzhev NS, Yu QD, Weiskopf K, Tzolovsky G, Cunha-Ferreira I, Riparbelli M, Rodrigues-Martins A, Bettencourt-Dias M, Callaini G, Glover DM. Asterless is a scaffold for the onset of centriole assembly. Nature 2010; 467: 714– 718. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 51. Lawo S, Hasegan M, Gupta GD, Pelletier L. Subdiffraction imaging of centrosomes reveals higher-order organizational features of pericentriolar material. Nat Cell Biol 2012; 14: 1148– 1158. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 52. Joukov V, Walter JC, De Nicolo A. The Cep192-organized aurora A-Plk1 cascade is essential for centrosome cycle and bipolar spindle assembly. Mol Cell 2014; 55: 578– 591. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 53. Meng L, Park JE, Kim TS, Lee EH, Park SY, Zhou M, Bang JK, Lee KS. Bimodal interaction of mammalian Polo-like kinase 1 and a centrosomal scaffold, Cep192, in the regulation of bipolar spindle formation. Mol Cell Biol 2015; 35: 2626– 2640. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 54. Junttila MR, Puustinen P, Niemela M, Ahola R, Arnold H, Bottzauw T, Ala-aho R, Nielsen C, Ivaska J, Taya Y, Lu SL, Lin S et al. CIP2A inhibits PP2A in human malignancies. Cell 2007; 130: 51– 62. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 55. Khanna A, Pimanda JE, Westermarck J. Cancerous inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A, an emerging human oncoprotein and a potential cancer therapy target. Cancer Res 2013; 73: 6548– 6553. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 56. Hu MW, Wang ZB, Jiang ZZ, Qi ST, Huang L, Liang QX, Schatten H, Sun QY. Scaffold subunit Aalpha of PP2A is essential for female meiosis and fertility in mice. Biol Reprod 2014; 91: 19. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 57. Solc P, Kitajima TS, Yoshida S, Brzakova A, Kaido M, Baran V, Mayer A, Samalova P, Motlik J, Ellenberg J. Multiple requirements of PLK1 during mouse oocyte maturation. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0116783. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 58. Woodruff JB, Ferreira Gomes B, Widlund PO, Mahamid J, Honigmann A, Hyman AA. The centrosome is a selective condensate that nucleates microtubules by concentrating tubulin. Cell 2017; 169: 1066– 1077. e1010. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 59. Roberts AJ, Kon T, Knight PJ, Sutoh K, Burgess SA. Functions and mechanics of dynein motor proteins. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2013; 14: 713– 726. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 60. Huang X, Wang HL, Qi ST, Wang ZB, Tong JS, Zhang QH, Ouyang YC, Hou Y, Schatten H, Qi ZQ, Sun QY. DYNLT3 is required for chromosome alignment during mouse oocyte meiotic maturation. Reprod Sci 2011; 18: 983– 989. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 61. Luksza M, Queguigner I, Verlhac MH, Brunet S. Rebuilding MTOCs upon centriole loss during mouse oogenesis. Dev Biol 2013; 382: 48– 56. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 62. Fitzharris G. A shift from kinesin 5-dependent metaphase spindle function during preimplantation development in mouse. Development 2009; 136: 2111– 2119. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 63. Shin MR, Kim NH. Maternal gamma (gamma)-tubulin is involved in microtubule reorganization during bovine fertilization and parthenogenesis. Mol Reprod Dev 2003; 64: 438– 445. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 64. Courtois A, Schuh M, Ellenberg J, Hiiragi T. The transition from meiotic to mitotic spindle assembly is gradual during early mammalian development. J Cell Biol 2012; 198: 357– 370. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 65. Coelho PA, Bury L, Sharif B, Riparbelli MG, Fu J, Callaini G, Glover DM, Zernicka-Goetz M. Spindle formation in the mouse embryo requires Plk4 in the absence of centrioles. Dev Cell 2013; 27: 586– 597. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 66. Schatten H, Sun QY. The role of centrosomes in mammalian fertilization and its significance for ICSI. Mol Hum Reprod 2009; 15: 531– 538. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 67. Musacchio A. The molecular biology of spindle assembly checkpoint signaling dynamics. Curr Biol 2015; 25: R1002– R1018. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 68. Lampson MA, Grishchuk EL. Mechanisms to avoid and correct erroneous kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Biology (Basel) 2017; 6: 1– 18. 69. Sudakin V, Chan GK, Yen TJ. Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J Cell Biol 2001; 154: 925– 936. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 70. Godek KM, Kabeche L, Compton DA. Regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments through homeostatic control during mitosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2015; 16: 57– 64. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 71. London N, Biggins S. Signalling dynamics in the spindle checkpoint response. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2014; 15: 736– 747. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 72. Liu D, Vader G, Vromans MJ, Lampson MA, Lens SM. Sensing chromosome bi-orientation by spatial separation of aurora B kinase from kinetochore substrates. Science 2009; 323: 1350– 1353. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 73. Alfieri C, Chang L, Zhang Z, Yang J, Maslen S, Skehel M, Barford D. Molecular basis of APC/C regulation by the spindle assembly checkpoint. Nature 2016; 536: 431– 436. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 74. Baker DJ, Jeganathan KB, Cameron JD, Thompson M, Juneja S, Kopecka A, Kumar R, Jenkins RB, de Groen PC, Roche P, van Deursen JM. BubR1 insufficiency causes early onset of aging-associated phenotypes and infertility in mice. Nat Genet 2004; 36: 744– 749. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 75. Wassmann K, Niault T, Maro B. Metaphase I arrest upon activation of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint in mouse oocytes. Curr Biol 2003; 13: 1596– 1608. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 76. Zhang D, Li M, Ma W, Hou Y, Li YH, Li SW, Sun QY, Wang WH. Localization of mitotic arrest deficient 1 (MAD1) in mouse oocytes during the first meiosis and its functions as a spindle checkpoint protein. Biol Reprod 2005; 72: 58– 68. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 77. Hached K, Xie SZ, Buffin E, Cladiere D, Rachez C, Sacras M, Sorger PK, Wassmann K. Mps1 at kinetochores is essential for female mouse meiosis I. Development 2011; 138: 2261– 2271. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 78. Sun SC, Lee SE, Xu YN, Kim NH. Perturbation of Spc25 expression affects meiotic spindle organization, chromosome alignment and spindle assembly checkpoint in mouse oocytes. Cell Cycle 2010; 9: 4552– 4559. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 79. Li M, Li S, Yuan J, Wang ZB, Sun SC, Schatten H, Sun QY. Bub3 is a spindle assembly checkpoint protein regulating chromosome segregation during mouse oocyte meiosis. PLoS One 2009; 4: e7701. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 80. Kolano A, Brunet S, Silk AD, Cleveland DW, Verlhac MH. Error-prone mammalian female meiosis from silencing the spindle assembly checkpoint without normal interkinetochore tension. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: E1858– 1867. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 81. Kyogoku H, Kitajima TS. Large cytoplasm is linked to the error-prone nature of oocytes. Dev Cell 2017; 41: 287– 298. e284. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 82. Jevtic P, Levy DL. More Cytoplasm, More Problems. Dev Cell 2017; 41: 221– 223. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 83. Galli M, Morgan DO. Cell Size Determines the strength of the spindle assembly checkpoint during embryonic development. Dev Cell 2016; 36: 344– 352. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 84. Steuerwald N, Cohen J, Herrera RJ, Sandalinas M, Brenner CA. Association between spindle assembly checkpoint expression and maternal age in human oocytes. Mol Hum Reprod 2001; 7: 49– 55. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 85. Lagirand-Cantaloube J, Ciabrini C, Charrasse S, Ferrieres A, Castro A, Anahory T, Lorca T. Loss of centromere cohesion in aneuploid human oocytes correlates with decreased kinetochore localization of the Sac proteins Bub1 and Bubr1. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 44001. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 86. Duncan FE, Chiang T, Schultz RM, Lampson MA. Evidence that a defective spindle assembly checkpoint is not the primary cause of maternal age-associated aneuploidy in mouse eggs. Biol Reprod 2009; 81: 768– 776. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 87. Kucej M, Zou H. DNA-dependent cohesin cleavage by separase. Nucleus 2010; 1: 4– 7. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 88. Kitajima TS, Kawashima SA, Watanabe Y. The conserved kinetochore protein shugoshin protects centromeric cohesion during meiosis. Nature 2004; 427: 510– 517. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 89. Clift D, Marston AL. The role of shugoshin in meiotic chromosome segregation. Cytogenet Genome Res 2011; 133: 234– 242. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 90. Revenkova E, Eijpe M, Heyting C, Hodges CA, Hunt PA, Liebe B, Scherthan H, Jessberger R. Cohesin SMC1 beta is required for meiotic chromosome dynamics, sister chromatid cohesion and DNA recombination. Nat Cell Biol 2004; 6: 555– 562. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 91. Hodges CA, Revenkova E, Jessberger R, Hassold TJ, Hunt PA. SMC1beta-deficient female mice provide evidence that cohesins are a missing link in age-related nondisjunction. Nat Genet 2005; 37: 1351– 1355. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 92. Lister LM, Kouznetsova A, Hyslop LA, Kalleas D, Pace SL, Barel JC, Nathan A, Floros V, Adelfalk C, Watanabe Y, Jessberger R, Kirkwood TB et al. Age-related meiotic segregation errors in mammalian oocytes are preceded by depletion of cohesin and Sgo2. Curr Biol 2010; 20: 1511– 1521. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 93. Chiang T, Duncan FE, Schindler K, Schultz RM, Lampson MA. Evidence that weakened centromere cohesion is a leading cause of age-related aneuploidy in oocytes. Curr Biol 2010; 20: 1522– 1528. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 94. Revenkova E, Herrmann K, Adelfalk C, Jessberger R. Oocyte cohesin expression restricted to predictyate stages provides full fertility and prevents aneuploidy. Curr Biol 2010; 20: 1529– 1533. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 95. Tsutsumi M, Fujiwara R, Nishizawa H, Ito M, Kogo H, Inagaki H, Ohye T, Kato T, Fujii T, Kurahashi H. Age-related decrease of meiotic cohesins in human oocytes. PLoS One 2014; 9: e96710. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 96. Garcia-Cruz R, Brieno MA, Roig I, Grossmann M, Velilla E, Pujol A, Cabero L, Pessarrodona A, Barbero JL, Garcia Caldes M. Dynamics of cohesin proteins REC8, STAG3, SMC1 beta and SMC3 are consistent with a role in sister chromatid cohesion during meiosis in human oocytes. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 2316– 2327. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 97. Liu L, Oldenbourg R, Trimarchi JR, Keefe DL. A reliable, noninvasive technique for spindle imaging and enucleation of mammalian oocytes. Nat Biotechnol 2000; 18: 223– 225. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 98. Wang WH, Keefe DL. Prediction of chromosome misalignment among in vitro matured human oocytes by spindle imaging with the PolScope. Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 1077– 1081. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 99. Wang WH, Keefe DL. Spindle observation in living mammalian oocytes with the polarization microscope and its practical use. Cloning Stem Cells 2002; 4: 269– 276. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 100. Coticchio G, Sciajno R, Hutt K, Bromfield J, Borini A, Albertini DF. Comparative analysis of the metaphase II spindle of human oocytes through polarized light and high-performance confocal microscopy. Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 2056– 2064. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 101. Yoon J, Jo Y, KIm M, Kim K, Lee S, Kang S, Park Y. Identification of non-activated lympocytes using three-dimensional refractive index tomography and machine learning. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 6654. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 102. van Noord-Zaadstra BM, Looman CW, Alsbach H, Habbema JD, te Velde ER, Karbaat J. Delaying childbearing: effect of age on fecundity and outcome of pregnancy. BMJ 1991; 302: 1361– 1365. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 103. Schattman GL. Clinical Practice. Cryopreservation of oocytes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 1755– 1760. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 104. Johnson KA, Borisy GG. Kinetic analysis of microtubule self-assembly in vitro. J Mol Biol 1977; 117: 1– 31. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 105. Boiso I, Marti M, Santalo J, Ponsa M, Barri PN, Veiga A. A confocal microscopy analysis of the spindle and chromosome configurations of human oocytes cryopreserved at the germinal vesicle and metaphase II stage. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 1885– 1891. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 106. Tamura AN, Huang TT, Marikawa Y. Impact of vitrification on the meiotic spindle and components of the microtubule-organizing center in mouse mature oocytes. Biol Reprod 2013; 89: 112. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed © The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Society for the Study of Reproduction. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Biology of Reproduction – Oxford University Press
Published: Feb 1, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera