Abstract Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumours harbour activating mutations within the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) frequently derive significant clinical and radiographic benefits from treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). As such, prospective identification of EGFR mutations is now the standard of care worldwide. However, acquired therapeutic resistance to these agents invariably develops. Over the past 10 years, great strides have been made in defining the molecular mechanisms of EGFR TKI resistance in an effort to design rational strategies to overcome this acquired drug resistance. Approximately 60% of patients with acquired resistance to the EGFR TKIs (erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib) develop a new mutation within the drug target. This mutation—T790M—has been shown to alter drug binding and enzymatic activity of the mutant EGF receptor. Less common mechanisms of acquired resistance include MET amplification, ERBB2 amplification, transformation to small-cell lung cancer, and others. Here, we present a condensed overview of the literature on EGFR-mutant NSCLC, paying particular attention to mechanisms of drug resistance, recent clinical trial results, and novel strategies for identifying and confronting drug resistance, while also striving to identify gaps in current knowledge. These advances are rapidly altering the treatment landscape for EGFR-mutant NSCLC, expanding the armamentarium of available therapies to maximize patient benefit. epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), lung cancer, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), acquired resistance, T790M Introduction Activating mutations within the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are found in ∼10%–15% of lung adenocarcinomas in the United States and Europe and in ∼40%–50% of cases in Asia [1–5]. The most common alterations include exon 19 deletions and the L858R point mutation in exon 21, collectively accounting for up to 90% of EGFR mutations in the clinic. The presence of these mutations is associated with sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), several of which have been developed to date (Table 1). The remaining 10% of EGFR mutations show variable TKI sensitivity , with some being sensitive (e.g. G719X, L861Q, S768I, EGFR fusions, and kinase domain duplications) [6–9], while others show comparatively poor response to first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs (e.g. most EGFR exon 20 insertions) [6, 10, 11]. Table 1. EGFR TKIs with regulatory approval for the treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC Generation Name Selectivity Reversible/Irreversible Approval status 1st Gefitinib WT EGFR Reversible FDA, EMA Erlotinib WT EGFR Reversible FDA, EMA Icotinib WT EGFR Reversible CFDA 2nd Afatinib WT EGFR Irreversible FDA, EMA, CFDA 3rd Osimertinib Mutant EGFR Irreversible FDA, EMA Olmutinib Mutant EGFR Irreversible KFDA (conditional) Generation Name Selectivity Reversible/Irreversible Approval status 1st Gefitinib WT EGFR Reversible FDA, EMA Erlotinib WT EGFR Reversible FDA, EMA Icotinib WT EGFR Reversible CFDA 2nd Afatinib WT EGFR Irreversible FDA, EMA, CFDA 3rd Osimertinib Mutant EGFR Irreversible FDA, EMA Olmutinib Mutant EGFR Irreversible KFDA (conditional) WT, wild-type; FDA, US Food and Drug Administration; EMA, European Medicines Agency; CFDA, China Food and Drug Administration; KFDA, Korea Food & Drug Administration. EGFR-mutant lung cancers display unique biological and clinical phenotypes, being one of the paradigmatic examples of oncogene-driven tumours. Among the major EGFR downstream effectors (i.e. RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK1/2, PI3K-AKT, and JAK2-STAT3/5), EGFR-mutated cells activate essential anti-apoptotic AKT and STAT signalling pathways, on which they have survival dependency . From a clinical standpoint, patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are often never smokers or light former smokers [1–4]. In addition, EGFR-mutant lung cancers may have a predilection for metastatic spread to the liver  and to the central nervous system (CNS) [14, 15]. Although a higher CNS tropism of EGFR-mutated disease has not been definitely established, it is remarkable that ∼25% of advanced-stage patients have baseline brain metastasis, and up to 50% will develop CNS metastasis during the course of their disease [14, 16]. First- and second-generation EGFR TKIs (Table 1), which were designed against the wild-type EGF receptor, yield robust and relatively durable responses in the majority of lung cancer patients whose tumours harbour EGFR sensitizing mutations. The first-generation drugs, including erlotinib and gefitinib, are reversible inhibitors. The second-generation inhibitors, including afatinib and dacomitinib, are irreversible inhibitors which covalently bind to EGFR. Multiple phase 3 clinical trials have shown that patients with EGFR-mutant tumours display >70% radiographic response rates (RRs) and a statistically significant improved progression-free survival (PFS) when treated with first-generation (erlotinib and gefitinib) or second-generation (afatinib) EGFR TKIs (Table 1) compared with platinum-based chemotherapy [17–20]. Consequently, these three drugs are globally approved without distinctions for these patients (Table 1). In addition, the first-generation TKI icotinib is approved in China (Table 1). Based on recently presented phase III data, the second-generation TKI dacomitinib may also be considered for regulatory approval . Unfortunately, these drugs do not cure patients. Acquired resistance, defined as systemic progression of disease (based on RECIST or WHO criteria) while on continuous treatment with an EGFR TKI , remains a significant barrier to overcome to deliver the most effective treatments to patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Typically, acquired resistance develops after a median of 9.2–14.7 months of TKI therapy [17, 18, 20, 21, 23–26]. Extensive research over the past few years has characterized some of the major resistance mechanisms [27, 28], allowing the development of effective therapies to overcome acquired therapeutic resistance. In this article, we summarize the latest evidence for practices which maximize the benefit of first- and second-generation EGFR inhibitors. We also provide an update on the molecular subtypes of acquired resistance. Finally, we comprehensively review current data on methods for identifying T790M-mediated versus non–T790M-mediated resistance, and we suggest a treatment algorithm considering clinical progression patterns together with molecular resistance mechanisms. Maximizing the efficacy of first-line EGFR TKI therapy In experimental cell-line based assays and xenograft tumour models, the second-generation EGFR inhibitors showed a higher potency than erlotinib or gefitinib against both EGFR sensitizing mutations (i.e. exon 19 deletion and L858R) and the EGFR T790M resistance mutation [27–30]. These findings, together with a broader pan-ErbB inhibition offered by second-generation EGFR TKIs [29, 30], served as the rationale to compare the efficacy of first- versus second-generation inhibitors in two randomized clinical trials. In the phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial, 319 patients were randomly assigned to receive first-line afatinib or gefitinib. There was a statistically significant increase in RR (70% versus 56%; P = 0.0083) and PFS (primary end point: hazard ratio (HR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58–0.92; P = 0.0073) in favour of afatinib , but overall survival (OS) differences (27.9 versus 24.5 months) did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66–1.12; P = 0.258) . Of note, there was no incremental benefit favouring afatinib in tumours with exon 19 deletions compared with L858R mutations , as was initially suggested from a retrospective pooled analysis of the LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6 trials . In the ARCHER 1050 trial, a randomized phase III study that enrolled 452 patients without CNS metastasis, dacomitinib showed a more robust PFS compared with gefitinib (14.7 versus 9.2 months; HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47–0.74; P < 0.0001) . Data on OS are still immature and have not been reported for this trial. Thus, both studies consistently suggest that more potent front-line pan-ErbB inhibition delays the emergence of resistance and disease progression. However, the adverse event profile was more pronounced with both afatinib  and dacomitinib  compared with gefitinib, predominantly due to an increase in skin and gastrointestinal toxicities. Therefore, this benefit to risk ratio should be individually evaluated when deciding between first- and second-generation TKIs for the front-line treatment of patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer. Combinatorial therapies with EGFR TKIs have also been investigated as an alternative to prolong disease control. Among them, anti-angiogenics have proven effective. Increased vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels have been detected in xenograft models of EGFR TKI-resistant lung cancer . The combination of EGFR TKI plus anti-VEGF therapy delayed the onset of T790M-mediated resistance compared with single-agent EGFR TKI and also resulted in tumour regression in TKI-resistant EGFR L858R/T790M-positive tumours . Translating these results to the clinic, a randomized phase II trial conducted in Japan (n = 152) showed that the combination treatment of erlotinib plus the anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody bevacizumab significantly prolonged PFS over erlotinib alone (16 versus 9.7 months: HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36–0.79; P = 0.0015), without significant differences in RR (69% versus 64%) . Typical bevacizumab-related toxicities were significantly increased in the combination arm (> 40% higher incidences of hypertension, proteinuria, and bleeding events), but no significant differences in erlotinib-related adverse events were noted . Encouraging efficacy data have been recently reported in single-arm trials conducted with gefitinib in Japan (n = 42, median PFS = 14.4 months)  and erlotinib in Europe (n = 109, median PFS = 13.8 months) . In the European study, and consistent with the preclinical data, the benefits of the combination seemed higher in patients with baseline EGFR T790M-positive tumours (n = 37, 34%), who reached a median PFS of 16 months and a 1-year survival rate of 72.4% . Bevacizumab has regulatory approval in Europe, United States, and Asia for the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC. A confirmatory phase III trial is currently ongoing (NCT02633189). Ramucirumab is also being tested in combination with erlotinib in another randomized phase III study in this setting (NCT02411448). Another consideration when deciding among the optimal front-line treatment options is which, if any, of these agents maximizes CNS disease control. The CNS is considered a ‘sanctuary site’, in that the amount of drug which effectively crosses the blood–brain barrier is an obstacle to achieve maximal antitumour effect in the CNS. Studies suggest that <2% of plasma drug concentration at steady state is detected in cerebrospinal fluids [36, 37], and it is likely that the concentration needed to inhibit EGFR above the IC50 is only maintained for a short time in the CNS at conventional doses . Clinically, no significant differences in terms of CNS responses between these compounds have been reported in small series [39–41]. However, some CNS responses have been reported with afatinib in patients previously treated with erlotinib or gefitinib . On the other hand, bevacizumab has been shown to prevent CNS metastasis in mouse models of lung adenocarcinoma , prompting speculation that the combination of an EGFR TKI plus bevacizumab could prevent or delay CNS metastasis in humans, although this has not yet been clinically evaluated. Molecular mechanisms of resistance to EGFR TKIs: target-dependent mechanisms For proper disease management, clinical indicators of progression must be analysed alongside biological information about underlying mechanisms of drug resistance. While multiple mechanisms can lead to TKI resistance, the EGFR T790M mutation is the most common mechanism of acquired resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs, being present in 50%–60% of the cases (Figure 1) [27, 28, 43]. The T790M mutation was first reported in 2004 as a rare variant co-occurring with EGFR L858R in a pulmonary resection from a TKI-naive patient . In 2005, two groups independently identified EGFR T790M as a secondary mutation occurring in patients who had had progressed on gefitinib after an initial response [45, 46]. The T790 residue is located within the ATP-binding pocket of the EGFR protein and mediates TKI resistance by increasing protein affinity for ATP . When it occurs in conjunction with activating mutations, T790M lowers Km[ATP], the concentration of ATP necessary to achieve a half-maximal reaction rate . These biochemical changes return ATP affinity to a level that more closely resembles wild-type EGFR, thereby decreasing the efficacy of first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs . The accompanying decrease in kcat, however, leads to decreased ATP throughput and lowering enzymatic turnover. This likely explains why, in the absence of EGFR TKIs, the T790M mutation confers a growth disadvantage in cells with canonical EGFR activating mutations . Figure 1. View largeDownload slide Mechanisms of acquired resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs. Frequencies (given in parentheses) are approximations. Only mechanisms that have been detected in patients and reported in at least two independent data series are included. Figure 1. View largeDownload slide Mechanisms of acquired resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs. Frequencies (given in parentheses) are approximations. Only mechanisms that have been detected in patients and reported in at least two independent data series are included. Evaluating EGFR T790M status is necessary in the setting of acquired resistance as it informs selection of subsequent therapies and is frequently required for access to clinical trials. Originally, re-biopsy of tumour tissue was the only option for acquiring material to assess T790M status [27, 28]. However, recently liquid biopsy genotyping has become an increasingly attractive alternative to tissue re-biopsy. Liquid biopsies offer a number of potential improvements over tissue biopsy, including decreased cost, improved patient safety, quicker turnaround time [49, 50], and a more ‘system-wide’ assessment to counteract heterogeneity between (or even within) different metastases [50, 51]. Liquid biopsy studies use either of two blood-based sources of genetic material: circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) or circulating tumour cells (CTCs). Analysis of ctDNA from patients who were known to harbour T790M in their tumour was first reported in 2009 . The first case in which longitudinal blood-based EGFR testing revealed acquisition of T790M was reported in 2013, using whole-exome sequencing of ctDNA . Since then, more than a dozen studies have looked at the feasibility of liquid biopsies for identifying EGFR resistance mutations, utilizing ctDNA [54–63] as well as CTCs [57, 61]. Recently, a prospective study of 180 patients showed acceptable correlation between ctDNA and tissue re-biopsy . Specifically, sensitivity of ctDNA-based detection of T790M via digital droplet PCR was calculated at 77.1%, specificity was 63.2%, and positive predictive value was 79% . These findings are in line with retrospective analyses of plasma-based versus tissue-based detection of T790M [57, 64]. In one such retrospective analysis, the RR (62% plasma and 63% tumour) and median PFS (9.7 months for both plasma and tumour) were similar in patients with T790M-positive plasma or T790M-positive tumour . However, based on these data, a negative plasma T790M test (i.e. T790M not detected in plasma) was insufficient to identify patients who could potentially benefit from osimertinib . The RR in patients with T790M plasma-negative/tumour-positive was 69% compared with 25% in patients with T790M plasma-negative/tumour-negative results, indicating that plasma-based testing alone would have missed some patients who would have responded to osimertinib . Based on these results, the National Cancer Comprehensive Network (NCCN) guidelines and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines now include plasma genotyping as an option at disease progression when tissue-based testing is not feasible [65, 66], although they both still encourage secondary re-biopsy to confirm a negative plasma assessment of T790M. Aside from the T790M mutation, only a handful of other secondary EGFR mutations that desensitize tumours to erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib have been reported. Case reports with accompanying in vitro validation exist only for D761Y [67, 68], L747S [69, 70], and T854A . EGFR L747S has also been reported as a rare variant in TKI-naive patients . A more common event is EGFR amplification, which occurs in ∼10% of patients who develop acquired resistance to these therapies. However, EGFR amplification is always detected in the presence of EGFR T790M (Figure 1) [67, 73]. It remains an open question whether EGFR amplification is an early event that promotes drug tolerance in these cells, a late event that helps cells circumvent deleterious effects of T790M, or simply a passenger event. Molecular mechanisms of resistance to EGFR TKIs: target-independent mechanisms Fewer than half of the cases of acquired EGFR TKI resistance are attributed to non–EGFR-centric adaptations. Of these, many are often classified as ‘bypass’ resistance mechanisms, as they utilize alternative cellular pathways to activate the same key downstream effectors of tumour cell growth and survival as EGFR, namely ERK1/2 and AKT1. The most common ‘bypass’ mechanism for resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs is amplification of ERBB2, a gene that encodes for the ErbB family member HER2. Although most well studied in breast cancer, where ERBB2 amplification drives 15%–30% of tumours , ERBB2 has also been implicated in other tumour types, most notably endometrial and gastric cancer [75, 76]. ERBB2 amplification occurs in ∼10%–15% of patients with EGFR TKI resistance (Figure 1) . To date, there are no HER2-specific targeted therapies approved for patients with EGFR-mutant cancer who develop resistance via ERBB2 amplification, nor are there enough data to suggest whether these patients would benefit from HER2-targeted therapies. Amplification of the MET gene, which encodes the MET tyrosine kinase receptor, is reported in ∼5% of patients with acquired resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs (Figure 1) [27, 28, 78]. MET is activated by hepatocyte growth factor, thereby potentiating growth, survival, and invasion pathways via Src, PI3K, and RAS family members . Although there are no targeted therapies specifically approved for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who progress on EGFR TKI due to MET amplification, there are case reports of clinical benefit when combining a MET inhibitor with an EGFR TKI in EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients whose tumours acquire MET amplification [80, 81]. Two phase Ib/II trials of the MET inhibitor capmatinib (INC280) alone or in combination with erlotinib (NCT02468661) and gefitinib (NCT01610336) are currently under way. Other ‘bypass’ mutations have been reported at a lower frequency (Figure 1). These include mutations in BRAF , PIK3CA , KRAS , PTEN loss , NF-1 loss , and CRKL amplification . Furthermore, resistance mediated by non-genetic changes has also been described, including up-regulation of IGF1R , FGFR , hepatocyte growth factor, and the ligand for MET [88, 89]. Likewise, activation of AXL kinase is associated with resistance to EGFR TKIs . These rare events, along with the more common ERBB2 and MET amplifications, sometimes co-occur with EGFR T790M [28, 63]. This is likely a result of metastatic heterogeneity [28, 63]. This phenomenon, which remains understudied, is becoming increasingly clinically relevant. Although binary designation of acquired resistance as T790M positive or T790M negative is useful for making therapeutic decisions, there is evidence that up to 46% of EGFR-mutant tumours with acquired resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs demonstrate co-occurring mechanisms of resistance . These co-occurring mutations likely influence treatment outcomes . Lastly, changes in tumour phenotype at time of disease progression are also well documented. Up to 10% of tumours from patients who fail EGFR TKI therapy show transformation to small-cell lung cancer morphology (Figure 1) [27, 28]. These transformed tumours display molecular profiles similar to classical small-cell lung cancer, such as loss of RB activity [91, 92] and TP53 activity . While the tumours retain the original EGFR mutation, EGFR expression is drastically reduced [27, 91], suggesting that these tumours are no longer driven by EGFR signalling . Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is also reported at the time of disease progression, although this is rare (1%–2% of the cases) [27, 90, 93]. There is also a recent report of two patients with adeno-to-squamous transformation concurrent with T790M acquisition , but this phenomenon has yet to be reported more broadly. It is important to note that any histological change at the time of disease progression on EGFR TKI therapy will be missed if one relies on liquid biopsies alone. Potential pharmacologic mediators of patient response to EGFR TKIs As noted previously, the blood–brain barrier is perhaps the most frequently encountered mediator of intra-patient differences in EGFR TKI bioavailability and efficacy [36–41]. Perhaps the most striking effect of poor CNS penetrance is differential disease evolution in response to TKI therapy, with brain metastases frequently showing different biological mechanisms of acquired drug resistance [27, 95]. As such, poor penetration of EGFR TKIs into the CNS is likely a factor that contributes to disease progression in otherwise TKI-responsive patients. Other mediators of drug bioavailability have also been studied. There are limited reports detailing non-biologic mediators of EGFR TKI exposure, although the extent to which these factors contribute to patient response may not be fully elucidated. Smoking, for example, results in decreased erlotinib plasma concentrations . Indeed, patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer who have a history of smoking have worse PFS with EGFR TKIs than non-smokers [97–99], although reduced plasma concentration was never shown to be causative. On the contrary, the phase III CurrentS study demonstrated that achieving higher plasma concentrations by increasing erlotinib dosage from 150 mg daily (the standard) to 300 mg did not result in increased PFS or OS for smokers . Likewise, antacid use is associated with altered absorption of erlotinib and perhaps gefitinib. Since these drugs are weakly basic, having a less-acidic stomach environment pushes them toward the non-ionized form, which is thought to decrease absorption . One study has shown retrospectively that concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) correlated with worse survival outcomes for patients who had taken erlotinib , although a separate, smaller study of gefitinib therapy concomitant with PPI use showed no such decrease in survival (507 patients in erlotinib study; 43 patients in gefitinib study) . As such, the development of the third-generation EGFR TKI osimertinib included a trial assessing pharmacokinetic changes in the presence of PPIs (NCT02224053). To further investigate this potential adverse drug–drug interaction, one prospective study investigated the use of cola, an acidic beverage, to counteract the effects of PPIs. Patients taking erlotinib plus PPI had increased erlotinib bioavailability when erlotinib was administered with cola, though this study did not assess whether there were changes in drug efficacy . Clinical identifiers of and treatment options for EGFR TKI resistance As described above, the Jackman criteria  are used to define acquired therapeutic resistance. This definition is usually considered as a standardized criterion for clinical trial selection, but substantial heterogeneity exists regarding clinical progression patterns. Acquired resistance can be categorized according to the presence or absence of symptoms derived from progressive disease, kinetics of tumour growth, and number of progressive metastases. Three clinical subtypes of acquired resistance according to the extent and sites of progressive disease are generally accepted: (i) systemic or multi-site progression, (ii) oligo-progression (three or less progressing locations), and (iii) isolated CNS progression . Data from retrospective series have shown that most patients (∼60%–70%) usually experience systemic progression, commonly (50%) at original metastatic sites [106–110]. Fewer patients fall into the oligo-progressive (∼20%–25%) [106, 108, 109] and CNS-only (∼15%) [111, 112] categories. Notably, the patterns of clinical progression have been shown to impact prognosis [106, 108] and therefore should be considered when dealing with resistance in the clinic. When a patient develops symptomatic multisite progression, second-line systemic treatment is recommended. Currently, the choice of second-line systemic therapy is primarily based on the presence or absence of the EGFR T790M mutation, detected either in plasma or tumour tissue. For the ∼50%–60% of patients who develop the T790M mutation on progression with erlotinib, gefitinib, or afatinib, the current standard therapy is osimertinib, a mutant-selective EGFR TKI which was designed to overcome the T790M resistance mutation . Based on convincing clinical trial data with this agent [114, 115], osimertinib is approved in the United States, Europe, and Asia for the treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with T790M-mediated acquired resistance. Besides osimertinib, other mutant-selective EGFR TKIs are being developed (Table 1). They will be discussed in a separate review in this supplement of the journal. For those patients with T790M-negative tumours at the time of acquired resistance, standard treatment is platinum-based chemotherapy (Figure 2). When platinum-based chemotherapy is considered, the IMPRESS trial showed that maintaining the EGFR TKI did not further improve survival outcomes . In contrast, in the context of indolent systemic progression, it is safe to continue the EGFR TKI and delay the initiation of a new systemic treatment (Figure 2). Thus, in the ASPIRATION trial, 54% of the patients were deemed to be candidates to continue first-line erlotinib beyond extracranial RECIST progression at physician discretion, thereby delaying salvage therapy for a median of 3.1 months in these subjects . Of note, up to 20% of the patients that are candidates to continue post-progression erlotinib do so for >12 months before initiating a new systemic therapy . Patients with longer time from best overall response to disease relapse, presence of slow-growing disease, and progression without extrathoracic metastasis are the better candidates for this approach [109, 117]. Some studies have suggested a survival benefit for continuing EGFR TKI beyond progression [106, 107, 117, 118], but this is likely a result of selection bias. Continuing EGFR TKI beyond RECIST progression in asymptomatic progressors could be an alternative to second-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with T790M-negative tumours (Figure 2). Figure 2. View largeDownload slide Proposed algorithm for the management and treatment of non-central nervous system progression. Red text refers to standard treatment options. CNS, central nervous system; TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Figure 2. View largeDownload slide Proposed algorithm for the management and treatment of non-central nervous system progression. Red text refers to standard treatment options. CNS, central nervous system; TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor. In patients who progress at a limited number of metastatic sites, the use of local ablative therapies (radiation or surgery) in progressing areas while continuing the EGFR TKI is another treatment alternative (Figure 2), based on the assumption of an ongoing benefit of the TKI within non-progressing lesions [119–121]. This method extended systemic disease control for >10 months in highly selected groups of individuals with non-CNS oligoprogressive disease [120, 121]. Finally, medical treatment of CNS progression is challenging and requires taking into consideration the presence of neurological symptoms, extent of CNS involvement, previous radiotherapy to the brain, and the status of systemic disease (controlled versus not controlled) (Figure 3). In cases with isolated CNS progression, the use of local ablative therapies to the CNS, such as stereotactic surgery, is considered a standard of care. The EGFR TKI can be continued after local therapy is completed [65, 66]. Indeed, there are several studies demonstrating that with this approach extracranial progression is delayed for a median of 6–10 months in this subgroup of patients [111, 112, 119]. However, some isolated reports and small case series have reported CNS responses in patients with progressive brain metastasis on standard EGFR TKI doses or leptomeningeal disease [95, 122, 123]. This approach has not been tested in clinical trials, and thus remains experimental. Figure 3. View largeDownload slide Proposed algorithm for the management and treatment of isolated central nervous system progression. Red text refers to standard treatment options. CNS, central nervous system; WBRT, whole brain radiotherapy; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Figure 3. View largeDownload slide Proposed algorithm for the management and treatment of isolated central nervous system progression. Red text refers to standard treatment options. CNS, central nervous system; WBRT, whole brain radiotherapy; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Discussion Conclusion New compounds and tools for the diagnosis and treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC continue to be developed. Among these, blood-based monitoring of disease progression may offer a safer and faster way of informing treatment decisions compared with tissue biopsy. Likewise, novel compounds and drug combinations offer the potential to delay or overcome acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs. Rapid adoption of evidence-based treatment paradigms offer the best hope for maximizing the survival benefit gained from first-line treatment of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Finally, it should be noted that there remains an unmet need to identify the cause of acquired resistance for 10%–15% of patients who stop responding to erlotinib, gefitinib, or afatinib. Interesting, although mechanisms of resistance to third-generation inhibitors are also incompletely understood, early reports implicate many of the same mechanisms as seen with earlier-generation TKIs . Elucidation of resistance mechanisms to first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs should continue to be pursued as these TKIs are sure to retain clinical utility, and newly identified mechanisms will inform development of next-generation EGFR TKIs. Funding DW was supported by a Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Fellowship (T32HL094296). JZ was funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Rio Hortega, CM15/00196). BCC was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2016R1A2B3016282). CML received support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Cancer Institute (NCI) R01CA121210 and P01-CA129243. CML was also supported by a Damon Runyon Clinical Investigator Award, a LUNGevity Career Development Award, a V Foundation Scholar-in-Training Award, an AACR-Genentech Career Development Award, and U10CA180864. LPA was funded by ISCIII: PI1401964, PIE15/00076, RTICC (R12/0036/0028) and CIBERONC (C16/12/00442), co-funded by FEDER from Regional Development European Funds (European Union) (no grant number applies). AstraZeneca has provided a sponsorship grant towards this independent publication. Disclosure BCC received research funding from Novartis, Bayer, AstraZeneca, MOGAM Institute, Dong-A ST. BCC has also served as a consultant for Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche, BMS, Yuhan, Pfizer, and Eli Lilly. CML has served as a consultant for Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Genoptix, Sequenom, and ARIAD and has been an invited speaker for Abbott and Qiagen. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Key Message When dealing with EGFR TKI resistance in EGFR-mutant NSCLC, clinical indicators of progression must be analyzed alongside biological information underlying mechanisms of drug resistance. References 1 Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non–small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2004; 350( 21): 2129– 2139. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 2 Paez JG, Jänne PA, Lee JC et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 2004; 304( 5676): 1497– 1500. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 3 Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M et al. EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from “never smokers” and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101( 36): 13306– 13311. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 4 Rosell R, Moran T, Queralt C et al. Screening for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2009; 361( 10): 958– 967. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 5 Yatabe Y, Kerr KM, Utomo A et al. EGFR mutation testing practices within the Asia Pacific region: results of a multicenter diagnostic survey. J Thorac Oncol 2015; 10( 3): 438– 445. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 6 Yang JC-H, Wu Y-L, Schuler M et al. Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16( 2): 141– 151. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 7 Gallant J-N, Sheehan JH, Shaver TM et al. EGFR kinase domain duplication (EGFR-KDD) is a novel oncogenic driver in lung cancer that is clinically responsive to afatinib. Cancer Discov 2015; 5( 11): 1155– 1163. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 8 Konduri K, Gallant J-N, Chae YK et al. EGFR fusions as novel therapeutic targets in lung cancer. Cancer Discov 2016; 6( 6): 601– 611. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 9 Watanabe S, Minegishi Y, Yoshizawa H et al. Effectiveness of gefitinib against non–small-cell lung cancer with the uncommon EGFR mutations G719X and L861Q. J Thorac Oncol 2014; 9( 2): 189– 194. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 10 Kosaka T, Tanizaki J, Paranal RM et al. Response heterogeneity of EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertions to covalent EGFR and HER2 inhibitors. Cancer Res 2017; 77( 10): 2712– 2721. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 11 Yasuda H, Park E, Yun C-H et al. Structural, biochemical, and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer. Sci Transl Med 2013; 5( 216): 216ra177– 216ra177. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 12 Sordella R, Bell DW, Haber DA, Settleman J. Gefitinib-sensitizing EGFR mutations in lung cancer activate anti-apoptotic pathways. Science 2004; 305( 5687): 1163– 1167. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 13 Doebele RC, Lu X, Sumey C et al. Oncogene status predicts patterns of metastatic spread in treatment‐naive nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer 2012; 118( 18): 4502– 4511. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 14 Shin D-Y, Kim CH, Park S et al. EGFR mutation and brain metastasis in pulmonary adenocarcinomas. J Thorac Oncol 2014; 9( 2): 195– 199. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 15 Iuchi T, Shingyoji M, Itakura M et al. Frequency of brain metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer, and their association with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. Int J Clin Oncol 2015; 20( 4): 674. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 16 Rangachari D, Yamaguchi N, VanderLaan PA et al. Brain metastases in patients with EGFR-mutated or ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancers. Lung Cancer 2015; 88( 1): 108– 111. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 17 Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K et al. Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 2010; 362( 25): 2380– 2388. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 18 Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y et al. Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11( 2): 121– 128. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 19 Rosell R, Gervais R, Vergnenegre A et al. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy (CT) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (p) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations: interim results of the European Erlotinib Versus Chemotherapy (EURTAC) phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 29S. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS 20 Sequist LV, Yang JC, Yamamoto N et al. Phase III study of afatinib or cisplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 3327– 3334. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 21 Mok T, Cheng Y, Zhou X et al. Dacomitinib versus gefitinib for the first-line treatment of advanced EGFR mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer (ARCHER 1050): a randomized, open-label phase III trial. In: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2017. [Epub Ahead of Print]. 22 Jackman D, Pao W, Riely GJ et al. Clinical definition of acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non–small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28( 2): 357– 360. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 23 Park K, Tan E-H, O'Byrne K et al. Afatinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (LUX-Lung 7): a phase 2B, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17( 5): 577– 589. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 24 Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R et al. Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13( 3): 239– 246. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 25 Wu Y-L, Zhou C, Hu C-P et al. Afatinib versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine for first-line treatment of Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (LUX-Lung 6): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15( 2): 213– 222. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 26 Zhou C, Wu Y-L, Chen G et al. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12( 8): 735– 742. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 27 Sequist LV, Waltman BA, Dias-Santagata D et al. Genotypic and histological evolution of lung cancers acquiring resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Sci Transl Med 2011; 3( 75): 75ra26– 75ra26. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 28 Yu H, Arcila ME, Rekhtman N et al. Analysis of mechanisms of acquired resistance to EGFR TKI therapy in 155 patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers. Clin Cancer Res 2013; 19( 8): 2240– 2247. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 29 Engelman JA, Zejnullahu K, Gale C-M et al. PF00299804, an irreversible pan-ERBB inhibitor, is effective in lung cancer models with EGFR and ERBB2 mutations that are resistant to gefitinib. Cancer Res 2007; 67( 24): 11924– 11932. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 30 Li D, Ambrogio L, Shimamura T et al. BIBW2992, an irreversible EGFR/HER2 inhibitor highly effective in preclinical lung cancer models. Oncogene 2008; 27( 34): 4702– 4711. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 31 Paz-Ares L, Tan E-H, O’Byrne K et al. Afatinib versus gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: overall survival data from the phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial. Ann Oncol 2017; 28( 2): 270– 277. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 32 Naumov GN, Nilsson MB, Cascone T et al. Combined vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) blockade inhibits tumor growth in xenograft models of EGFR inhibitor resistance. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15( 10): 3484– 3494. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 33 Seto T, Kato T, Nishio M et al. Erlotinib alone or with bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (JO25567): an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15( 11): 1236– 1244. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 34 Ichihara E, Hotta K, Nogami N et al. Phase II trial of gefitinib in combination with bevacizumab as first-line therapy for advanced non–small cell lung cancer with activating EGFR gene mutations: the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 1001. J Thorac Oncol 2015; 10( 3): 486– 491. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 35 Rosell R, Dafni U, Felip E et al. Erlotinib and bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and activating EGFR mutations (BELIEF): an international, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Respir Med 2017; 5( 5): 435– 444. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 36 Hoffknecht P, Tufman A, Wehler T et al. Efficacy of the irreversible ErbB family blocker afatinib in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)–pretreated non–small-cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases or leptomeningeal disease. J Thorac Oncol 2015; 10( 1): 156– 163. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 37 Togashi Y, Masago K, Masuda S et al. Cerebrospinal fluid concentration of gefitinib and erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cacer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2012; 70( 3): 399– 405. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 38 Yang Z, Guo Q, Wang Y et al. AZD3759, a BBB-penetrating EGFR inhibitor for the treatment of EGFR mutant NSCLC with CNS metatases. Sci Transl Med 2016; 8( 368): 368ra172-368ra172. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS 39 Porta R, Sanchez-Torres J, Paz-Ares L et al. Brain metastases from lung cancer responding to erlotinib: the importance of EGFR ation. Eur Respir J 2011; 37( 3): 624– 631. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 40 Park S, Kim H, Lee D et al. Efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for brain metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring either exon 19 or 21 mutation. Lung Cancer 2012; 77( 3): 556– 560. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 41 Iuchi T, Shingyoji M, Sakaida T et al. Phase II trial of gefitinib alone without radiation therapy for Japanese patients with brain metastases from EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer 2013; 82( 2): 282– 287. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 42 Ilhan-Mutlu A, Osswald M, Liao Y et al. Bevacizumab prevents brain metastases formation in lung adenocarcinoma. Mol Cancer Ther 2016; 15( 4): 702– 710. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 43 Campo M, Gerber D, Gainor JF et al. Acquired resistance to first-line afatinib and the challenges of prearranged progression biopsies. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11( 11): 2022– 2026. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 44 Kosaka T, Yatabe Y, Endoh H et al. Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in lung cancer. Cancer Res 2004; 64( 24): 8919– 8923. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 45 Kobayashi S, Boggon TJ, Dayaram T et al. EGFR mutation and resistance of non–small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2005; 352( 8): 786– 792. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 46 Pao W, Miller VA, Politi KA et al. Acquired resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib is associated with a second mutation in the EGFR kinase domain. PLoS Med 2005; 2( 3): e73. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 47 Yun C-H, Mengwasser KE, Toms AV et al. The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105( 6): 2070– 2075. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 48 Chmielecki J, Foo J, Oxnard GR et al. Optimization of dosing for EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer with evolutionary cancer modeling. Sc Transl Med 2011; 3( 90): 90ra59– 90ra59. 49 Haber DA, Velculescu VE. Blood-based analyses of cancer: circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA. Cancer Discov 2014; 4( 6): 650– 661. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 50 Sacher AG, Paweletz C, Dahlberg SE et al. Prospective validation of rapid plasma genotyping for the detection of EGFR and KRAS mutations in advanced lung cancer. JAMA Oncol 2016; 2( 8): 1014– 1022. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 51 Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 2012; 366( 10): 883– 892. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 52 Kuang Y, Rogers A, Yeap BY et al. Noninvasive detection of EGFR T790M in gefitinib or erlotinib resistant non–small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15( 8): 2630– 2636. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 53 Murtaza M, Dawson S-J, Tsui DW et al. Non-invasive analysis of acquired resistance to cancer therapy by sequencing of plasma DNA. Nature 2013; 497( 7447): 108– 112. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 54 Sakai K, Horiike A, Irwin DL et al. Detection of epidermal growth factor receptor T790M mutation in plasma DNA from patients refractory to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Cancer Sci 2013; 104( 9): 1198– 1204. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 55 Wang Z, Chen R, Wang S et al. Quantification and dynamic monitoring of EGFR T790M in plasma cell-free DNA by digital PCR for prognosis of EGFR-TKI treatment in advanced NSCLC. PloS One 2014; 9( 11): e110780. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 56 Thress KS, Brant R, Carr TH et al. EGFR mutation detection in ctDNA from NSCLC patient plasma: a cross-platform comparison of leading technologies to support the clinical development of AZD9291. Lung Cancer 2015; 90( 3): 509– 515. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 57 Sundaresan TK, Sequist LV, Heymach JV et al. Detection of T790M, the acquired resistance EGFR mutation, by tumor biopsy versus noninvasive blood-based analyses. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22( 5): 1103– 1110. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 58 Lee JY, Qing X, Xiumin W et al. Longitudinal monitoring of EGFR mutations in plasma predicts outcomes of NSCLC patients treated with EGFR TKIs: Korean Lung Cancer Consortium (KLCC-12-02). Oncotarget 2016; 7( 6): 6984. Google Scholar PubMed 59 Sueoka‐Aragane N, Katakami N et al. Monitoring EGFR T790M with plasma DNA from lung cancer patients in a prospective observational study. Cancer Sci 2016; 107( 2): 162– 167. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 60 Reckamp KL, Melnikova VO, Karlovich C et al. A highly sensitive and quantitative test platform for detection of NSCLC EGFR mutations in urine and plasma. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11( 10): 1690– 1700. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 61 Yanagita M, Redig AJ, Paweletz CP et al. A prospective evaluation of circulating tumor cells and cell-free DNA in EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer patients treated with erlotinib on a phase II trial. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22( 24): 6010– 6020. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 62 Zheng D, Ye X, Zhang M et al. Plasma EGFR T790M ctDNA status is associated with clinical outcome in advanced NSCLC patients with acquired EGFR-TKI resistance. Sci Rep 2016; 6( 1): 20913. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 63 Chabon JJ, Simmons AD, Lovejoy AF et al. Circulating tumour DNA profiling reveals heterogeneity of EGFR inhibitor resistance mechanisms in lung cancer patients. Nat Comms 2016; 7: 13513. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS 64 Oxnard GR, Thress KS, Alden RS et al. Association between plasma genotyping and outcomes of treatment with osimertinib (AZD9291) in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34( 28): 3375– 3382. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 65 Novello S, Barlesi F, Califano R et al. Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2016; 27(suppl_5): v1– v27. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS 66 Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL et al. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN guidelines). Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.V9.2017; http://www.nccn.org (25 June 2017, date last accessed). 67 Balak MN, Gong Y, Riely GJ et al. Novel D761Y and common secondary T790M mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor–mutant lung adenocarcinomas with acquired resistance to kinase inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12( 21): 6494– 6501. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 68 Toyooka S, Date H, Uchida A et al. The epidermal growth factor receptor D761Y mutation and effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13( 11): 3431– 3431. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 69 Costa DB, Halmos B, Kumar A et al. BIM mediates EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced apoptosis in lung cancers with oncogenic EGFR mutations. PLoS Med 2007; 4( 10): e315. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS 70 Costa DB, Schumer ST, Tenen DG, Kobayashi S. Differential responses to erlotinib in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung cancers with acquired resistance to gefitinib carrying the L747S or T790M secondary mutations. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26( 7): 1182– 1184. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 71 Bean J, Riely GJ, Balak M et al. Acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor kinase inhibitors associated with a novel T854A mutation in a patient with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2008; 14( 22): 7519– 7525. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 72 Yamaguchi F, Fukuchi K, Yamazaki Y et al. Acquired resistance L747S mutation in an epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naive patient: a report of three cases. Oncol Lett 2014; 7: 357– 360. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 73 Ercan D, Zejnullahu K, Yonesaka K et al. Amplification of EGFR T790M causes resistance to an irreversible EGFR inhibitor. Oncogene 2010; 29( 16): 2346– 2356. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 74 Burstein HJ. The distinctive nature of HER2-positive breast cancers. N Engl J Med 2005; 353( 16): 1652– 1654. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 75 Hofmann M, Stoss O, Shi D et al. Assessment of a HER2 scoring system for gastric cancer: results from a validation study. Histopathology 2008; 52( 7): 797– 805. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 76 Santin AD, Bellone S, Roman JJ et al. Trastuzumab treatment in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma overexpressing HER2/neu. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2008; 102( 2): 128– 131. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS 77 Takezawa K, Pirazzoli V, Arcila ME et al. HER2 amplification: a potential mechanism of acquired resistance to EGFR inhibition in EGFR-mutant lung cancers that lack the second-site EGFR T790M mutation. Cancer Discov 2012; 2( 10): 922– 933. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 78 Engelman JA, Zejnullahu K, Mitsudomi T et al. MET amplification leads to gefitinib resistance in lung cancer by activating ERBB3 signaling. Science 2007; 316( 5827): 1039– 1043. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 79 Abounader R, Laterra J. Scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor in brain tumor growth and angiogenesis. Neuro-Oncology 2005; 7( 4): 436– 451. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 80 Gainor JF, Niederst MJ, Lennerz JK et al. Dramatic response to combination erlotinib and crizotinib in a patient with advanced, EGFR-mutant lung cancer harboring de novo MET amplification. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11( 7): e83– e85. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 81 York ER, Varella-Garcia M, Bang TJ et al. Tolerable and effective combination of full-dose crizotinib and osimertinib targeting MET amplification sequentially emerging after T790M positivity in EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2017. 82 Ohashi K, Sequist LV, Arcila ME et al. Lung cancers with acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors occasionally harbor BRAF gene mutations but lack mutations in KRAS, NRAS, or MEK1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012; 109( 31): E2127– E2133. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 83 Sos ML, Koker M, Weir BA et al. PTEN loss contributes to erlotinib resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer by activation of Akt and EGFR. Cancer Res 2009; 69( 8): 3256– 3261. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 84 de Bruin EC, Cowell C, Warne PH et al. Reduced NF1 expression confers resistance to EGFR inhibition in lung cancer. Cancer Discov 2014; 4( 5): 606– 619. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 85 Cheung HW, Du J, Boehm JS et al. Amplification of CRKL induces transformation and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor resistance in human non–small cell lung cancers. Cancer Discov 2011; 1( 7): 608– 625. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 86 Cortot AB, Repellin CE, Shimamura T et al. Resistance to irreversible EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors through a multistep mechanism involving the IGF1R pathway. Cancer Res 2013; 73( 2): 834– 843. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 87 Ware K, Hinz T, Kleczko E et al. A mechanism of resistance to gefitinib mediated by cellular reprogramming and the acquisition of an FGF2-FGFR1 autocrine growth loop. Oncogenesis 2013; 2: e39. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 88 Yano S, Yamada T, Takeuchi S et al. Hepatocyte growth factor expression in EGFR mutant lung cancer with intrinsic and acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in a Japanese cohort. J Thorac Oncol 2011; 6. 89 Yano S, Wang W, Li Q et al. Hepatocyte growth factor induces gefitinib resistance of lung adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor–activating mutations. Cancer Res 2008; 68( 22): 9479– 9487. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 90 Zhang Z, Lee JC, Lin L et al. Activation of the AXL kinase causes resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy in lung cancer. Nat Genet 2012; 44( 8): 852– 860. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 91 Niederst MJ, Sequist LV, Poirier JT et al. RB loss in resistant EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinomas that transform to small-cell lung cancer. Nat Commun 2015; 6. 92 Lee J-K, Lee J, Kim S et al. Clonal history and genetic predictors of transformation into small-cell carcinomas from lung adenocarcinomas. J Clin Oncol 2017; JCO. 2016.2071. 9096. 93 Della Corte CM, Bellevicine C, Vicidomini G et al. SMO gene amplification and activation of the hedgehog pathway as novel mechanisms of resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor drugs in human lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 21( 20): 4686– 4697. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 94 Jukna A, Montanari G, Mengoli MC et al. Squamous cell carcinoma “transformation” concurrent with secondary T790M mutation in resistant EGFR-mutated adenocarcinomas. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11( 4): e49– e51. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 95 Grommes C, Oxnard GR, Kris MG et al. “Pulsatile” high-dose weekly erlotinib for CNS metastases from EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer. Neuro-Oncology 2011; 13( 12): 1364– 1369. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 96 Hamilton M, Wolf JL, Rusk J et al. Effects of smoking on the pharmacokinetics of erlotinib. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12(7 Pt 1): 2166– 2171. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS 97 Igawa S, Sasaki J, Otani S et al. Impact of smoking history on the efficacy of gefitinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. Oncology 2015; 89( 5): 275– 280. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 98 Hasegawa Y, Ando M, Maemondo M et al. The role of smoking status on the progression-free survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations receiving first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor versus platinum doublet chemotherapy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials. Oncologist 2015; 20( 3): 307– 315. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 99 Togashi Y, Hayashi H, Okamoto K et al. Chronic nicotine exposure mediates resistance to EGFR-TKI in EGFR-mutated lung cancer via an EGFR signal. Lung Cancer 2015; 88( 1): 16– 23. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 100 Smit EF, Wu Y-L, Gervais R et al. A randomized, double-blind, phase III study comparing two doses of erlotinib for second-line treatment of current smokers with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (CurrentS). Lung Cancer 2016; 99: 94– 101. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 101 Budha N, Frymoyer A, Smelick G et al. Drug absorption interactions between oral targeted anticancer agents and PPIs: Is pH‐dependent solubility the Achilles heel of targeted therapy? Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012; 92( 2): 203– 213. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 102 Chu MP, Ghosh S, Chambers CR et al. Gastric acid suppression is associated with decreased erlotinib efficacy in non–small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2015; 16( 1): 33– 39. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 103 Saeki S, Sasaki J, Morioka J et al. The influence of gastric secretion inhibitors on gefitinib therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor activating mutations. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: e18059– e18059. 104 Van Leeuwen RW, Peric R, Hussaarts KG et al. Influence of the acidic beverage cola on the absorption of erlotinib in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34( 12): 1309– 1314. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 105 Gandara DR, Li T, Lara PN et al. Acquired resistance to targeted therapies against oncogene-driven non–small-cell lung cancer: approach to subtyping progressive disease and clinical implications. Clin Lung Cancer 2014; 15( 1): 1– 6. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 106 Yang J-J, Chen H-J, Yan H-H et al. Clinical modes of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor failure and subsequent management in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2013; 79( 1): 33– 39. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 107 Asami K, Okuma T, Hirashima T et al. Continued treatment with gefitinib beyond progressive disease benefits patients with activating EGFR mutations. Lung Cancer 2013; 79( 3): 276– 282. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 108 Yoshida T, Yoh K, Niho S et al. RECIST progression patterns during EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring an EGFR mutation. Lung Cancer 2015; 90( 3): 477– 483. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 109 Lo PC, Dahlberg SE, Nishino M et al. Delay of treatment change after objective progression on first‐line erlotinib in epidermal growth factor receptor‐mutant lung cancer. Cancer 2015; 121( 15): 2570– 2577. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 110 Al-Halabi H, Sayegh K, Digamurthy SR et al. Pattern of failure analysis in metastatic EGFR-mutant lung cancer treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors to identify candidates for consolidation stereotactic body radiation therapy. J Thorac Oncol 2015; 10( 11): 1601– 1607. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 111 Lee YJ, Choi HJ, Kim SK et al. Frequent central nervous system failure after clinical benefit with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Korean patients with nonsmall‐cell lung cancer. Cancer 2010; 116( 5): 1336– 1343. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 112 Shukuya T, Takahashi T, Naito T et al. Continuous EGFR-TKI administration following radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer patients with isolated CNS failure. Lung Cancer 2011; 74( 3): 457– 461. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 113 Cross DA, Ashton SE, Ghiorghiu S et al. AZD9291, an irreversible EGFR TKI, overcomes T790M-mediated resistance to EGFR inhibitors in lung cancer. Cancer Discov 2014; 4( 9): 1046– 1061. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 114 Jänne PA, Yang JC-H, Kim D-W et al. AZD9291 in EGFR inhibitor–resistant non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 372( 18): 1689– 1699. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 115 Mok TS, Wu Y-L, Ahn M-J et al. Osimertinib or platinum-pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2017; 376( 7): 629– 640. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 116 Soria J-C, Wu Y-L, Nakagawa K et al. Gefitinib plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer after progression on first-line gefitinib (IMPRESS): a phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16( 8): 990– 998. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 117 Park K, Yu C-J, Kim S-W et al. First-line erlotinib therapy until and beyond response evaluation criteria in solid tumors progression in Asian patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation–positive non–small-cell lung cancer: the ASPIRATION study. JAMA Oncol 2016; 2( 3): 305– 312. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 118 Nishie K, Kawaguchi T, Tamiya A et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors beyond progressive disease: a retrospective analysis for Japanese patients with activating EGFR mutations. J Thorac Oncol 2012; 7( 11): 1722– 1727. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 119 Weickhardt AJ, Scheier B, Burke JM et al. Local ablative therapy of oligoprogressive disease prolongs disease control by tyrosine kinase inhibitors in oncogene-addicted non–small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2012; 7( 12): 1807– 1814. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 120 Helena AY, Sima CS, Huang J et al. Local therapy with continued EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy as a treatment strategy in EGFR-mutant advanced lung cancers that have developed acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. J Thorac Oncol 2013; 8( 3): 346– 351. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 121 Conforti F, Catania C, Toffalorio F et al. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors beyond focal progression obtain a prolonged disease control in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung. Lung Cancer 2013; 81( 3): 440– 444. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 122 Hata A, Kaji R, Fujita S, Katakami N. High-dose erlotinib for refractory brain metastases in a patient with relapsed non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2011; 6( 3): 653– 654. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 123 Jackman DM, Holmes AJ, Lindeman N et al. Response and resistance in a non–small-cell lung cancer patient with an epidermal growth factor receptor mutation and leptomeningeal metastases treated with high-dose gefitinib. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24( 27): 4517– 4520. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: email@example.com.
Annals of Oncology – Oxford University Press
Published: Jan 1, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera