Making Prussians, Raising Germans: A Cultural History of Prussian State-Building after Civil War, 1866–1935

Making Prussians, Raising Germans: A Cultural History of Prussian State-Building after Civil War,... Jasper Heinzen’s first monograph aims to reframe historical interpretations of ‘1866 and all that’, focusing in particular on the ramifications of civil war within Germany, rather than privileging external conflicts with Italy and Austria. This concentration on what he terms the ‘German war’ (p. 4) allows Heinzen to explore in great depth what it might mean for an annexed state such as Hanover, the subject of this detailed case study, to be subsumed against its will by a victorious and largely unsympathetic Prussia. What consequences did enduring tensions between Prussian imperial and provincial particularist ambitions have for the eventual stability of the Kaiserreich, the Weimar Republic, or even National Socialism? Heinzen makes use of a versatile and wide-ranging selection of sources, from the lovingly sewn patriotic banners of local veterans’ associations to the potentially seditious correspondence of female philanthropic organizations, whilst also interweaving microhistorical in-depth analysis with macrohistorical insights facilitated by transnational comparisons with other states which had recently undergone civil wars—namely the USA, Switzerland and Italy—in a form of histoire croisée which is intended to supersede older historiographical narratives of Prussian exceptionalism. However, perhaps the image which stands most tellingly for the ambitions of the monograph as a whole is that which Heinzen uses to illustrate both the ambiguities of memorialization and the limits of acceptable mourning for the lost Hanoverian state—the Provincial War Memorial in the city of Hanover, which portrayed Germania flanked by spirits of victory, poised atop a plinth featuring the mourning figure of defeated ‘Hanovera’ (pp. 96–7). Heinzen’s decision to focus on the Kingdom and subsequently the Prussian Province of Hanover is motivated not only by Hanover’s status as the largest state to be annexed by Prussia, but by the extremely diverse political and confessional allegiances of its population. Moreover, since Guelphist resistance to Prussian rule and the vagaries of memory politics in the new province were complemented by the geographical threat which a hostile Hanover could pose to Prussian territorial integrity, its cultural (as well as factual) conquest was deemed by Prussian state-builders to be of particular importance. Following an extensive theoretical and historical introduction, six chapters deal with various aspects of Hanoverian assimilation and its limits—spiced throughout with soupçons of transnational comparison with the three aforementioned countries. Thus, Heinzen explores the contested nature of Hanoverian militarism in a newly Prussian context, including the dilemmas faced by officers and veterans’ associations who were now forced to offer allegiance to the sovereign of a formerly hostile power; the ritual and architectural commemorations and memorializations of the newly ‘shattered’ Hanoverian past, and the role of print culture, periodicals and public libraries in facilitating propagandization, censorship and permissible dissent—using the so-called Welfenfonds clandestinely as a form of slush fund, Bismarck’s Literarisches Büro cannily regulated the flow of cheap information, subsidies and trained journalists to newspapers in the provinces. Further chapters investigate the tensions between region and nation, as embodied in battles over textbooks and the content of school syllabuses, and the role of Hanoverian nursing organizations in retaining and maintaining a legitimist counter-culture whilst simultaneously becoming ever more attuned to Hohenzollern imperial ends. The final chapter traces the roots of attempted Guelph coups in the wake of German defeat in 1918 (and counterpart coups in other states) all the way back to tropes which had become entrenched following previous experiences of German civil war half a century earlier, mingled with a new, quasi-Wilsonian politics of separatism. Heinzen concludes by suggesting that Germany’s trajectory followed less a Sonderweg than a middle path between the courses followed by America, Italy and Switzerland, respectively—at least, until the advent of National Socialist excesses. All in all, Heinzen’s monograph can be placed very much in the same tradition of ground-breaking works on nineteenth-century German regionalism and state-building as Abigail Green’s Fatherlands and Alon Confino’s The Nation as a Local Metaphor—yet with a transnational twist. Although one occasionally feels that the comparative passages could have been better integrated into the flow of the narrative—perhaps an indication of the book’s original genesis as a less explicitly transnational thesis—and despite the densely packed opacity of its prose, this is a study that will repay close rereading. Making Prussians, Raising Germans therefore represents a valuable and thought-provoking addition to the existing historiography on Teutonic state-building during this period, and Heinzen’s genuinely comparative approach will also broaden the book’s appeal well beyond the confines of German history. © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the German History Society. All rights reserved. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png German History Oxford University Press

Making Prussians, Raising Germans: A Cultural History of Prussian State-Building after Civil War, 1866–1935

German History , Volume 36 (3) – Sep 1, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ou_press/making-prussians-raising-germans-a-cultural-history-of-prussian-state-A9ZWuvYtUM
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the German History Society. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0266-3554
eISSN
1477-089X
D.O.I.
10.1093/gerhis/ghy028
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Jasper Heinzen’s first monograph aims to reframe historical interpretations of ‘1866 and all that’, focusing in particular on the ramifications of civil war within Germany, rather than privileging external conflicts with Italy and Austria. This concentration on what he terms the ‘German war’ (p. 4) allows Heinzen to explore in great depth what it might mean for an annexed state such as Hanover, the subject of this detailed case study, to be subsumed against its will by a victorious and largely unsympathetic Prussia. What consequences did enduring tensions between Prussian imperial and provincial particularist ambitions have for the eventual stability of the Kaiserreich, the Weimar Republic, or even National Socialism? Heinzen makes use of a versatile and wide-ranging selection of sources, from the lovingly sewn patriotic banners of local veterans’ associations to the potentially seditious correspondence of female philanthropic organizations, whilst also interweaving microhistorical in-depth analysis with macrohistorical insights facilitated by transnational comparisons with other states which had recently undergone civil wars—namely the USA, Switzerland and Italy—in a form of histoire croisée which is intended to supersede older historiographical narratives of Prussian exceptionalism. However, perhaps the image which stands most tellingly for the ambitions of the monograph as a whole is that which Heinzen uses to illustrate both the ambiguities of memorialization and the limits of acceptable mourning for the lost Hanoverian state—the Provincial War Memorial in the city of Hanover, which portrayed Germania flanked by spirits of victory, poised atop a plinth featuring the mourning figure of defeated ‘Hanovera’ (pp. 96–7). Heinzen’s decision to focus on the Kingdom and subsequently the Prussian Province of Hanover is motivated not only by Hanover’s status as the largest state to be annexed by Prussia, but by the extremely diverse political and confessional allegiances of its population. Moreover, since Guelphist resistance to Prussian rule and the vagaries of memory politics in the new province were complemented by the geographical threat which a hostile Hanover could pose to Prussian territorial integrity, its cultural (as well as factual) conquest was deemed by Prussian state-builders to be of particular importance. Following an extensive theoretical and historical introduction, six chapters deal with various aspects of Hanoverian assimilation and its limits—spiced throughout with soupçons of transnational comparison with the three aforementioned countries. Thus, Heinzen explores the contested nature of Hanoverian militarism in a newly Prussian context, including the dilemmas faced by officers and veterans’ associations who were now forced to offer allegiance to the sovereign of a formerly hostile power; the ritual and architectural commemorations and memorializations of the newly ‘shattered’ Hanoverian past, and the role of print culture, periodicals and public libraries in facilitating propagandization, censorship and permissible dissent—using the so-called Welfenfonds clandestinely as a form of slush fund, Bismarck’s Literarisches Büro cannily regulated the flow of cheap information, subsidies and trained journalists to newspapers in the provinces. Further chapters investigate the tensions between region and nation, as embodied in battles over textbooks and the content of school syllabuses, and the role of Hanoverian nursing organizations in retaining and maintaining a legitimist counter-culture whilst simultaneously becoming ever more attuned to Hohenzollern imperial ends. The final chapter traces the roots of attempted Guelph coups in the wake of German defeat in 1918 (and counterpart coups in other states) all the way back to tropes which had become entrenched following previous experiences of German civil war half a century earlier, mingled with a new, quasi-Wilsonian politics of separatism. Heinzen concludes by suggesting that Germany’s trajectory followed less a Sonderweg than a middle path between the courses followed by America, Italy and Switzerland, respectively—at least, until the advent of National Socialist excesses. All in all, Heinzen’s monograph can be placed very much in the same tradition of ground-breaking works on nineteenth-century German regionalism and state-building as Abigail Green’s Fatherlands and Alon Confino’s The Nation as a Local Metaphor—yet with a transnational twist. Although one occasionally feels that the comparative passages could have been better integrated into the flow of the narrative—perhaps an indication of the book’s original genesis as a less explicitly transnational thesis—and despite the densely packed opacity of its prose, this is a study that will repay close rereading. Making Prussians, Raising Germans therefore represents a valuable and thought-provoking addition to the existing historiography on Teutonic state-building during this period, and Heinzen’s genuinely comparative approach will also broaden the book’s appeal well beyond the confines of German history. © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the German History Society. All rights reserved. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

Journal

German HistoryOxford University Press

Published: Sep 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off