Add Journal to My Library
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
, Volume 476 (1) – May 1, 2018

5 pages

/lp/ou_press/m-r-estimates-for-two-neutron-stars-in-lmxbs-with-possible-r-mode-XsIuyAO05B

- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Copyright
- © 2018 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society
- ISSN
- 0035-8711
- eISSN
- 1365-2966
- D.O.I.
- 10.1093/mnras/sty203
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract The puzzling existence of a number of neutron stars that appear to be in the r-mode instability window supports further investigations of the r-mode frequencies, damping times and saturation amplitudes, especially now in light of the much anticipated and exciting results from LIGO and NICER. It has been suggested by Mahmoodifar and Strohmayer that coherent frequencies found in the RXTE data of the accreting millisecond pulsar XTE J1751−305 and during the 2001 superburst of 4U 1636−536 (one of the accreting sources to be observed by NICER) could, in fact, be r-modes. Based on these observations, we expand here the results of a previous work on relativistic, rotational, and differential rotation corrections to the r-mode frequency in order to provide more accurate estimates of the M–R relation for these neutron stars. Finally, we compare our results with predictions from a few realistic tabulated equations of state, providing further constraints that favour more compact models. We find that, if the observed frequencies indeed correspond to r-modes, then the masses of XTE J1751−305 and 4U 1636−536 should lie in the approximate ranges 1.48–1.56 and 1.60–1.68 M⊙, respectively. dense matter, gravitational waves, stars: neutron, stars: oscillations 1 INTRODUCTION It is an exciting time to work with neutron stars and gravitational waves. After the confirmed detection of four binary black hole mergers (Abbott et al. 2016a,b, 2017b,c), the first detection of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star merger by LIGO and Virgo has initiated the age of multimessenger astronomy with gravitational waves, and it has already provided some preliminary constraints on the neutron star equation of state (Abbott et al. 2017d). Moreover, the launch of the NICER mission last July (Arzoumanian, Gendreau & Marwardt 2017) increases the expectations for the determination of masses and radii of the primary target neutron stars with both high precision and accuracy. Neutron stars have long been proposed as sources of gravitational waves, but not only in binaries. Oscillation modes of rotating neutron stars are subject to the Chandrasekhar–Friedman–Schutz instability (Chandrasekhar 1970; Friedman & Schutz 1978), and r-modes, in particular, are unstable even for slowly rotating stars. The r-modes are coupled to the emission of gravitational waves, and their amplitude will increase until it reaches a certain saturation amplitude, which is still the topic of much debate. The comparison between the r-mode growth time-scale and the stellar fluid viscosity damping time-scale shapes the instability window in the period–temperature diagram. According to the usual picture, the r-mode instability will be activated if a neutron star happens to enter the instability window, and then the star will quickly radiate gravitational waves that will take away its extra angular momentum until the star is once again out of the instability window. This mechanism has also been proposed as a possible explanation for the observed periods of pulsars. However, it is a puzzling observational fact that there are a few neutron stars that seem to be inside the window (Mahmoodifar & Strohmayer 2017b). More precise calculations of the r-modes and their instability window are needed in order to help explain these observations. Another interesting piece of the puzzle comes from the observation by Mahmoodifar and Strohmayer of coherent oscillations in the spectra of XTE J1751−305 (Strohmayer & Mahmoodifar 2014a) and 4U 1636−536 (Strohmayer & Mahmoodifar 2014b). Their frequencies are tantalizingly close to the Newtonian estimate for the r-mode frequency of these stars. Strohmayer & Mahmoodifar (2014a) suggested that possible identifications of the observed frequency include rotationally modified g-modes or alternatively an inertial mode or core r-mode modified by the presence of a solid crust. However, the r-mode amplitude derived from the observed modulation amplitude would lead to a spin-down rate too large to be consistent with the observations. The spin evolution of XTE J1751−305 was rediscussed by Andersson, Jones & Ho (2014), who concluded from their analysis of different r-mode scenarios (stable/unstable and saturated/unsaturated) that the presence of an r-mode with the large amplitude suggested by Strohmayer & Mahmoodifar (2014a) cannot be reconciled with the observed spin-up of the star during the outburst and must therefore be considered unlikely. However, it has also been suggested by Lee (2014) that the frequency could be a surface g-mode or r-mode, and alternatives like unstable toroidal crust modes or the amplification at the surface of a core r-mode with a lower amplitude were also discussed. In a previous work (Jasiulek & Chirenti 2017), we have carefully calculated the corrections to the r-mode frequencies taking into account relativistic and rotational effects in fast rotating neutron stars, also including a possibly strong differential rotation. These results were obtained in the relativistic Cowling approximation (that neglects all metric perturbations), by numerically solving the linear perturbation equations in the fixed stellar background and extending to fast rotation our previous results calculated in the slow rotation approximation (Chirenti & Skákala 2013; Chirenti, Skákala & Yoshida 2013). In this paper, we improve on our previous results by proposing a method to estimate the error due to the Cowling approximation, and extending our calculations for stars with different radii. We use our improved results to estimate allowed mass ranges for XTE J1751−305 and 4U 1636−536, given a representative range for the neutron stars’ radius (Miller & Lamb 2016), and allowing the stars to have a small differential rotation [compatible with what is expected from glitch models (Link 2014)]. Our analysis is an improvement of the work presented by Andersson et al. (2014), who used as a first approximation the fully relativistic calculation of the r-mode frequency for slowly rotating uniform density stars from Lockitch, Friedman & Andersson (2003) with the second-order rotational corrections calculated for fast rotating Newtonian polytropes given by Lindblom, Mendell & Owen (1999). This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we briefly discuss some of the current expectations for the determination of neutron stars masses and radii, and how the r-mode observations can also be used for this purpose. The most relevant corrections to the r-mode frequency are reviewed in Section 3. We present our numerical results for the mass–radius constraints in Section 4 and our final conclusions in Section 5. 2 DETERMINATION OF NEUTRON STAR MASSES AND RADII 2.1 Current data and expectations Determinations of neutron star masses in binary systems have provided the most precise and reliable mass estimates so far (Miller & Lamb 2016). Current observations indicate a maximum mass of at least 2 M⊙, with mass distributions for different populations of neutron stars showing a possible bimodal distribution with peaks at ≈1.3 and ≈1.5 M⊙ (Özel & Freire 2016). Different models indicate that the neutron star radius could be as low as ≈10 km or as high as ≈ 15 km, but several models predict a radius from ≈11 to ≈13 km (see for instance fig. 2 of Gandolfi et al. 2012, or figs 10 and 9 of Lattimer & Steiner 2014a,b, respectively). We will take this as our representative range for the neutron star’s radius. Precise determinations of the mass M and radius R for several neutron stars would be enormously helpful to rule out models and equations of state, but systematic errors could render results unreliable (even if they are formally statistically precise; Miller & Lamb 2016). The NICER mission is expected to provide both precise and accurate measurements of (M, R) for four non-accreting main target stars. Right now, NICER is already installed on the international space station and taking data (Arzoumanian et al. 2017). First results could come out in the next several months (Bogdanov et al. 2017). The NICER team will also study bursting sources, including 4U 1636−536 (Mahmoodifar & Strohmayer 2017a). However, any (M, R) information from this type of source will likely take considerably longer to generate from the data. That is because, unlike the expectations for non-accreting sources, analyses of bursting sources will require many separate data sets (a few per burst). Further in the future, third generation gravitational wave detectors such as the Einstein Telescope (Punturo et al. 2010) or the Cosmic Explorer (Abbott et al. 2017a) could probe tidal effects in the gravitational wave signal of the inspiral of binary neutron star mergers, also providing information on the equation of state (Hinderer et al. 2010). [If the binary is highly eccentric, even characteristic modes of oscillation could be excited during the inspiral with enough amplitude for detection (Chirenti, Gold & Miller 2017), and universal relations could then be used to solve the inverse problem (Chirenti, de Souza & Kastaun 2015).] Preliminary constraints on the tidal deformability parameters of the neutron star have already been recently proposed by the analysis of the first binary neutron star merger event, GW170817, and seem to favour softer equations of state (see fig. 5 of Abbott et al. 2017d). 3 ACCURATE MODELS FOR THE R-MODE FREQUENCIES 3.1 Estimates for M and R from the r-mode frequencies Here, we will follow a different route from Section 2 and try to obtain constraints on the mass and radius of two neutron stars based on their (possibly) observed r-mode frequencies. If the frequencies reported by Strohmayer & Mahmoodifar (2014a,b) indeed corresponded to an r-mode, we can improve the approach used by Andersson et al. (2014) to estimate their masses and radii. In our previous work (Jasiulek & Chirenti 2017), we solved the linear perturbation equations in the Cowling approximation and obtained for the ℓ = m = 2 r-mode frequency in the rotating frame, σR, \begin{equation} \frac{\sigma _{\rm R}}{\Omega }\equiv \kappa = \kappa _0 + \kappa _2\, \frac{\Omega ^2}{\pi G \bar{\rho }} + \kappa _3, \end{equation} (1)where Ω = 2πf is the angular velocity of the star, $$\bar{\rho }$$ is the average density of the star, κ0 is the value in the slow rotation approximation, κ2 is the rotational correction, and κ3 is a correction that arises if we allow the neutron star to have differential rotation, which we included in the form of the j-constant law (Komatsu, Eriguchi & Hachisu 1989a,b). We found in Jasiulek & Chirenti (2017) that the κi corrections to κ are functions of the compactness M/R, and we expect them to be approximately independent of the equation of state (Idrisy, Owen & Jones 2015). Therefore, if σR and Ω are both determined observationally, we can use a representative range for the neutron star radius to solve equation (1), or an improved version of it, for the mass of the star. 3.2 Going beyond the cowling approximation The most obvious and important improvement that is needed is to go beyond the Cowling approximation. In Jasiulek & Chirenti (2017), we presented a first direct computation of the error in the r-mode frequencies due to the Cowling approximation. This was done by extrapolating our numerical results, obtained for fast rotating relativistic polytropic stars in the Cowling approximation, to f → 0 (which gives the κ0 term in equation (1)) and comparing with the fully relativistic (non-Cowling) results calculated in the slow-rotation approximation (see equation 70 from Idrisy et al. 2015). We found that the error increases with compactness, ranging from 6 per cent to 11 per cent in the models we considered. In Fig. 1, we present a first improvement in our extrapolation for the slow-rotation case, given by the lower dashed curve, where we used mode recycling to get more precise results for the r-mode frequencies. The upper dashed curve shows κ0 calculated in full general relativity by Idrisy et al. (2015). The difference between the two dashed curves gives the error due to the Cowling approximation in the slow-rotation limit. Figure 1. View largeDownload slide κ(M/R) curves for f = 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 Hz, from the bottom to top (solid curves). The lower dashed curve is the extrapolation of our results for f → 0 and from it we find κ0 = 0.644 − 0.385(M/R) − 1.84(M/R)2. The upper dashed curve shows the fully relativistic $$\kappa _0^{\rm{GR}}$$ given in equation (70) from Idrisy et al. (2015), and we take the difference between the two dashed curves as our κcorr defined in equation (3). Figure 1. View largeDownload slide κ(M/R) curves for f = 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 Hz, from the bottom to top (solid curves). The lower dashed curve is the extrapolation of our results for f → 0 and from it we find κ0 = 0.644 − 0.385(M/R) − 1.84(M/R)2. The upper dashed curve shows the fully relativistic $$\kappa _0^{\rm{GR}}$$ given in equation (70) from Idrisy et al. (2015), and we take the difference between the two dashed curves as our κcorr defined in equation (3). So far, there is no code available that can do fast rotation and fully relativistic simulations because of the coupling in the perturbation equations. Our error estimate is reliable for slowly rotating models, but what about neutron stars with faster rotation? In order to answer this question, we turn to Yoshida & Kojima (1997), where who present a study on the accuracy of the Cowling approximation for f-modes. They write the f-mode frequency σ of a rotating star as \begin{equation} \sigma = \sigma _0 + \sigma _0^{\prime }m\epsilon, \end{equation} (2)where σ0 (σR in the notation of equation (21) in Yoshida & Kojima 1997) is the real part of the frequency of the f-mode for the non-rotating star, and the second term is a parametrization of the rotational correction to the l = m f-mode frequency, in terms of the azimuthal number m and $$\epsilon = \Omega /\sqrt{M/R^3}$$ (angular velocity of the star normalized by the Keplerian break-up speed). A comparison between the σ0 and $$\sigma _0^{\prime }$$ obtained with and without the Cowling approximation is presented in figs 1a and 1b of Yoshida & Kojima (1997). They find that (a) the error due to the Cowling approximation only depends on M/R; (b) the behaviour of the rotational correction $$\sigma _0^{\prime }$$ is the same for Cowling and non-Cowling calculations; and (c) the error due to the Cowling approximation in $$\sigma _0^{\prime }$$ is small. For f-modes, they find that the maximum relative error in $$\sigma _0^{\prime }$$ is ≈ 1.9 per cent (for l = 2 and M/R = 0.05). For p-modes, the maximum relative error is ≈ 1.1 per cent. We must stress that the rotational corrections were calculated in the slow-rotation approximation in Yoshida & Kojima (1997). However, our analysis of their results gives us confidence to use our error estimate for the frequencies (shown in Fig. 1) also for our faster rotating stars. Therefore, we propose to formally substitute the first term in equation (1) by \begin{equation} \kappa _0 \rightarrow \kappa _0 + \kappa _{\rm {corr}} \equiv \kappa _0^{\rm {GR}}, \end{equation} (3)with κ0, κcorr, and $$\kappa _0^{\rm {GR}}$$ given as in the caption of Fig. 1. As the Cowling approximation is more accurate for r-modes than it is for f-modes, we conservatively estimate that the error we are making for our fastest rotating stars should be lower than 5 per cent. 3.3 Rotational correction The expression we obtained for the rotational κ2 as a function of M/R in equation (1) in Jasiulek & Chirenti (2017) was calculated for different polytropes with increasing compactness and fixed volumetric radius R = 14.15 km from a fit κ = a + bf2 of our numerical data. In order to use our results for different values of R, we performed now a few simulations with fixed M/R, and we found that b ∝ R2. This resembles the functional dependence of the second term in equation (1), which can be explicitly written as \begin{equation} \kappa _2\frac{4\Omega ^2}{3G}\frac{R^2}{M/R}, \end{equation} (4)and it also agrees with equation (4.11) of Lindblom et al. (1999) for Newtonian stars (including the perturbation of the Newtonian potential).1 We have compared our results for κ2 with the formula given by Lindblom et al. (1999), see Fig. 2. Our results are nearly coincident for lower compactness (and reproduce the value for the n = 1 Newtonian polytropic star with M/R = 0.165 quoted in their table I), but the difference increases towards higher compactness. This is consistent with the expectation for a comparison with the perturbation equations for Newtonian stars. It is also important to note that this is one of the key ingredients responsible for the difference between our mass estimate for XTE J1751−305 and the value predicted by Andersson et al. (2014), as can be seen in Fig. 3 and discussed below. Figure 2. View largeDownload slide The rotational correction κ2 as a function of the compactness M/R. The solid line shows our results obtained in the relativistic Cowling approximation, from which we find κ2 = 0.466 − 1.93(MR) + 2.98(MR)2. The dashed line shows the corresponding value κ2 = 0.299 obtained for the same stars, but this time using equation (4.11) of Lindblom et al. (1999), which uses the two potential formalism that includes the perturbation of the Newtonian potential. Figure 2. View largeDownload slide The rotational correction κ2 as a function of the compactness M/R. The solid line shows our results obtained in the relativistic Cowling approximation, from which we find κ2 = 0.466 − 1.93(MR) + 2.98(MR)2. The dashed line shows the corresponding value κ2 = 0.299 obtained for the same stars, but this time using equation (4.11) of Lindblom et al. (1999), which uses the two potential formalism that includes the perturbation of the Newtonian potential. Figure 3. View largeDownload slide Top panel: The top solid line (blue) shows the constraint on M/R for XTE J1751−305 from equation (5) in Andersson et al. (2014), whereas the bottom solid line (yellow) represents our result from equation (1) for a uniformly rotating star (κ3 = 0) with the improvements on κ0, κ2 and the correction due to the Cowling approximation discussed in Sections 3.2 and 3.3. The dashed lines show the effect of a stronger differential rotation with Δf = 10, 50 Hz for better visualization, and the transversal curves show M(R) for three realistic tabulated equations of state (from the left to right: APR4 Akmal et al. 1998, SLy Douchin & Haensel 2001, and H4 Lackey et al. 2006). Bottom panel: Same as the top plot, but for 4U 1636−536. Figure 3. View largeDownload slide Top panel: The top solid line (blue) shows the constraint on M/R for XTE J1751−305 from equation (5) in Andersson et al. (2014), whereas the bottom solid line (yellow) represents our result from equation (1) for a uniformly rotating star (κ3 = 0) with the improvements on κ0, κ2 and the correction due to the Cowling approximation discussed in Sections 3.2 and 3.3. The dashed lines show the effect of a stronger differential rotation with Δf = 10, 50 Hz for better visualization, and the transversal curves show M(R) for three realistic tabulated equations of state (from the left to right: APR4 Akmal et al. 1998, SLy Douchin & Haensel 2001, and H4 Lackey et al. 2006). Bottom panel: Same as the top plot, but for 4U 1636−536. 3.4 Differential rotation A small amount of differential rotation could be present in neutron stars in LMXBs, and it might be relevant for the determination of the r-mode frequencies in stars with high compactness (Jasiulek & Chirenti 2017). More specifically, r-modes (as well as accretion) could be responsible for generating differential rotation in a neutron star, but viscosity in general and magnetic braking, in particular, could quickly bring the star back to uniform rotation (Rezzolla et al. 2001a,b). So how much differential rotation should be expected? It is believed that differential rotation can play an important role in the glitch phenomenon, and in section 4.3 of Link (2014), it is suggested that the maximum velocity difference that could be sustained in the inner crust due to vortex pinning could be ≈rωcrit ≈ 106 cm s−1, and it would produce a variation Δf ≈ 1 Hz inside the star. The usual parametrization of the j-constant law for differential rotation is given in terms of the dimensionless quantity $$\hat{A}$$ (Baumgarte, Shapiro & Shibata 2000). However, differentially rotating stars with the same $$\hat{A}$$ but different compactness will have different values for Δf (Jasiulek & Chirenti 2017), which could be considered as a more realistic measure of the differential rotation of the star. In Jasiulek & Chirenti (2017), we found a parametrization of the differential rotation correction κ3 for neutron stars with strong differential rotation and $$\hat{A}$$ in the range [0, 0.5]. However, for a more realistic differential rotation with Δf ≳; 10 Hz, we must have $$\hat{A} \lessapprox 0.1$$, and in this range we find that κ3 is best described by \begin{equation} \kappa _3 = c\hat{A}^{-2} + {\rm d}\hat{A}^{-4}, \end{equation} (5)where we find c = 0.27 and d = 0.33 on average for models with f = 400, 500, 600 Hz and M/R = 0.17, 0.19, 0.21 (this is the relevant range for XTE J1751−305 and 4U 1636−536, see Section 4 for more details). However, if we choose to describe κ3 in terms of Δf instead of $$\hat{A}$$ in this range, we find to lowest order in Δf/f \begin{equation} \kappa _3 \approx \left(-0.046 + 0.91\frac{M}{R}\right)\frac{\Delta f}{f}\,. \end{equation} (6)This is the expression we will use in order to fix the physical differential rotation parameter Δf in our results given in Section 4. 4 NUMERICAL RESULTS FOR XTE J1751−305 AND 4U 1636−536 Now we are in possession of the best estimate for the r-mode frequency as a function of the stellar compactness, radius, and angular velocity, and we can use it to estimate the compactness of the two stars XTE J1751−305 and 4U 1636−536 for which it was reported that a frequency compatible with an r-mode was detected. Strohmayer & Mahmoodifar (2014a) found an oscillation with a frequency of 0.572 7597 times the spin frequency of 435 Hz in the 2002 discovery outburst of XTE J1751−305. An interpretation of this frequency as an r-mode therefore implies κ = 0.572 7597. For the 4U 1636−536 star, Strohmayer & Mahmoodifar (2014b) report that they detected a coherent modulation at a frequency of 835.6440 ± 0.0002 Hz, which is 1.435 46 times the stellar spin frequency of 582.143 23 Hz (in the inertial frequency frame). In this case, we find κ = 2 − 835.6440/582.143 23 = 0.564 5388. With these values of κ for both stars and a representative range for the neutron star radius (see Section 2.1), we can solve for M in equation (1), including the κcorr term from equation (3), the rotational correction κ2 as given by Fig. 2 and a differential rotation term κ3 consistent with a realistic differential rotation with Δf ≳ 1 Hz inside the star. In Fig. 3, we present our results for uniformly and differentially rotating models, and compare with the fit given by equation (5) of Andersson et al. (2014). Our results for uniformly rotating stars are ≈ 15 per cent lower than the estimate given by Andersson et al. (2014), where the fully relativistic r-mode frequency for slowly rotating uniform density stars from Lockitch et al. (2003) was combined with the second-order rotational corrections for Newtonian polytropes from Lindblom et al. (1999). As we mentioned in Section 3.3, the main factor for this difference is our improved calculation of the rotational correction κ2 (see Fig. 2). Differential rotation increases our mass estimate, but the effect is rather small: Δf = 10 Hz increases the total mass by only ≈0.02 M⊙. In the range 11–13 km for the stellar radius, we find from our results 1.41–1.71 M⊙ for XTE J1751−305 and 1.53–1.87 M⊙ for 4U 1636−536. We can use the transversal curves in Fig. 3, which indicate M(R) for a choice of three realistic tabulated equations of state (APR4 Akmal, Pandharipande & Ravenhall 1998, SLy Douchin & Haensel 2001 and H4 Lackey, Nayyar & Owen 2006) to gain more insight. Each equation of state crosses our M(r) line only once, providing a unique prediction for M and R. However, we can see that H4 requires R > 13 km for both stars and is therefore less favoured according to current expectations for the neutron star radius. Combining the constraints from both the r-mode frequencies and the APR4 and SLy equations of state, we find a more restricted range of values for M and R: R ≈ 11.5–12 km and M ≈ 1.48–1.56 M⊙ for XTE J1751−305 and R ≈ 11.4–11.9 km and M ≈ 1.60–1.68 M⊙ for 4U 1636−536. However, it must be stressed here that these tight constraints are only valid if the frequencies reported in Strohmayer & Mahmoodifar (2014a,b) are indeed core r-mode frequencies (see the discussion in Section 1). 5 CONCLUSIONS Here, we have explored the consequences for the mass and radius estimates of these two stars if the frequencies detected by Mahmoodifar and Strohmayer really correspond to their r-modes. We used a careful calculation of the r-mode frequency, taking into account relativistic, rotational, and differential rotation corrections, as well as an estimate for the error due to the Cowling approximation, to find improved constraints on the compactness M/R of XTE J1751−305 and 4U 1636−536. Our results yield, for a representative radius of 12 km, masses of 1.55 M⊙ and 1.70 M⊙, respectively. For XTE J1751−305, our value is approximately 15 per cent lower than what was obtained by Andersson et al. (2014), and we found no other estimate for the mass of 4U 1636−536 in the literature. Differential rotation has a small effect on the mass estimates. If we allow the neutron star to have a Δf of 10 Hz, this produces an offset in the mass of approximately 0.02 M⊙. This effect seems to be roughly linear in Δf, so a more realistic differential rotation of 1 Hz would be virtually undetectable. We also analysed three different realistic tabulated equations of state combined with our constraints on M/R from the r-mode frequencies. Our analysis favours more compact models. For both of our two stars, we found that H4 requires R > 13 km, which is out of our representative range of ≈11 to ≈13 km (Miller & Lamb 2016). We used the APR4 and SLy equations of state to refine our predictions for mass and radius at the end of Section 4, and our final mass estimates are M ≈ 1.48–1.56 M⊙ for XTE J1751−305 and M ≈ 1.60–1.68 M⊙ for 4U 1636−536. Our results can be used as an indication in favour of softer equations of state like APR4 and SLy, but they should be taken with care, especially because of the disputed nature of the (possible) r-mode frequencies that we have analysed here. Ideally, other observations including mass and radius estimates for these stars should be compared with our results to provide more conclusive evidence, also to prove or disprove the r-mode picture as an explanation for the observed frequencies. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Ian Jones, Simin Mahmoodifar and Cole Miller for useful comments and also Lee Lindblom and Gregory Mendell for their help with the implementation of their equation for κ2. This work was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP grant 2015/20433-4). Footnotes 1 Note that in Lindblom et al. (1999), R denotes the radius of the corresponding non-rotating model. We found that the volumetric radius can be used to generalize their expressions in the cases of fastly spinning and noticeably deformed stars. REFERENCES Abbott B. P. et al. , 2016a, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 116, 061102 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 CrossRef Search ADS Abbott B. P. et al. , 2016b, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 116, 241103 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241103 CrossRef Search ADS Abbott B. P. et al. , 2017a, Class. Quantum Gravity , 34, 044001 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aa51f4 CrossRef Search ADS Abbott B. P. et al. , 2017b, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 118, 221101 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.221101 CrossRef Search ADS Abbott B. P. et al. , 2017c, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 119, 141101 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.141101 CrossRef Search ADS Abbott B. P. et al. , 2017d, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 119, 161101 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101 CrossRef Search ADS Akmal A., Pandharipande V. R., Ravenhall D. G., 1998, Phys. Rev. C , 58, 1804 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.58.1804 CrossRef Search ADS Andersson N., Jones D. I., Ho W. C. G., 2014, MNRAS , 442, 1786 https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu870 CrossRef Search ADS Baumgarte T. W., Shapiro S. L., Shibata M., 2000, ApJ , 528, L29 https://doi.org/10.1086/312425 CrossRef Search ADS Bogdanov S. et al. , 2017, AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division #16 , 16, 104.04 Chandrasekhar S., 1970, ApJ , 161, 561 https://doi.org/10.1086/150560 CrossRef Search ADS Chirenti C., Skákala J., 2013, Phys. Rev. D , 88, 104018 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.104018 CrossRef Search ADS Chirenti C., Skákala J., Yoshida S., 2013, Phys. Rev. D , 87, 044043 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.044043 CrossRef Search ADS Chirenti C., de Souza G. H., Kastaun W., 2015, Phys. Rev. D , 91, 044034 CrossRef Search ADS Chirenti C., Gold R., Miller M. C., 2017, ApJ , 837, 67 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ebb CrossRef Search ADS Douchin F., Haensel P., 2001, A&A , 380, 151 CrossRef Search ADS Friedman J. L., Schutz B. F., 1978, ApJ , 222, 281 https://doi.org/10.1086/156143 CrossRef Search ADS Gandolfi S., Carlson J., Reddy S., 2012, Phys. Rev. C , 85, 032801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.032801 CrossRef Search ADS Hinderer T., Lackey B. D., Lang R. N., Read J. S., 2010, Phys. Rev. D , 81, 123016 CrossRef Search ADS Idrisy A., Owen B. J., Jones D. I., 2015, Phys. Rev. D , 91, 024001 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.024001 CrossRef Search ADS Jasiulek M., Chirenti C., 2017, Phys. Rev. D , 95, 064060 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.064060 CrossRef Search ADS Komatsu H., Eriguchi Y., Hachisu I., 1989a, MNRAS , 237, 355 https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/237.2.355 CrossRef Search ADS Komatsu H., Eriguchi Y., Hachisu I., 1989b, MNRAS , 239, 153 https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/239.1.153 CrossRef Search ADS Lackey B. D., Nayyar M., Owen B. J., 2006, Phys. Rev. D , 73, 024021 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.73.024021 CrossRef Search ADS Lattimer J. M., Steiner A. W., 2014a, Eur. Phys. J. A , 50, 40 https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2014-14040-y CrossRef Search ADS Lattimer J. M., Steiner A. W., 2014b, ApJ , 784, 123 https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/784/2/123 CrossRef Search ADS Lee U., 2014, MNRAS , 442, 3037 https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu1077 CrossRef Search ADS Lindblom L., Mendell G., Owen B. J., 1999, Phys. Rev. D , 60, 064006 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.064006 CrossRef Search ADS Link B., 2014, ApJ , 789, 141 https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/789/2/141 CrossRef Search ADS Lockitch K. H., Friedman J. L., Andersson N., 2003, Phys. Rev. D , 68, 124010 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.124010 CrossRef Search ADS Mahmoodifar S., Strohmayer T. E., 2017a, AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division #16 , 16,104.05 Mahmoodifar S., Strohmayer T., 2017b, ApJ , 840, 94 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa6d62 CrossRef Search ADS Miller M. C., Lamb F. K., 2016, Eur. Phys. J. A , 52, 63 https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16063-8 CrossRef Search ADS Özel F., Freire P., 2016, ARA&A , 54, 401 CrossRef Search ADS Punturo M. et al. , 2010, Class. Quantum Gravity , 27, 194002 https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/27/19/194002 CrossRef Search ADS Rezzolla L., Lamb F. K., Marković D., Shapiro S. L., 2001a, Phys. Rev. D , 64, 104013 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.64.104013 CrossRef Search ADS Rezzolla L., Lamb F. K., Marković D., Shapiro S. L., 2001b, Phys. Rev. D , 64, 104014 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.64.104014 CrossRef Search ADS Strohmayer T., Mahmoodifar S., 2014a, ApJ , 784, 72 https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/72 CrossRef Search ADS Strohmayer T., Mahmoodifar S., 2014b, ApJ , 793, L38 https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/793/2/L38 CrossRef Search ADS Yoshida S., Kojima Y., 1997, MNRAS , 289, 117 https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/289.1.117 CrossRef Search ADS Arzoumanian Z., Gendreau K., Markwardt C., 2017, AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division #16 , 16, 206.01 © 2018 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society – Oxford University Press

**Published: ** May 1, 2018

Loading...

personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly

**discover** and **read** the research

that matters to you.

Enjoy **affordable access** to

over 18 million articles from more than

**15,000 peer-reviewed journals**.

All for just $49/month

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from *SpringerNature*, *Elsevier*, *Wiley-Blackwell*, *Oxford University Press* and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

## “Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”

Daniel C.

## “Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”

@Phil_Robichaud

## “I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”

@deepthiw

## “My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”

@JoseServera

DeepDyve ## Freelancer | DeepDyve ## Pro | |
---|---|---|

Price | FREE | $49/month |

Save searches from | ||

Create lists to | ||

Export lists, citations | ||

Read DeepDyve articles | Abstract access only | Unlimited access to over |

20 pages / month | ||

PDF Discount | 20% off | |

Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.

System error. Please try again!

or

By signing up, you agree to DeepDyve’s Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Already have an account? Log in

Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.

To save an article, **log in** first, or **sign up** for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.

All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.

ok to continue