LEONARD NEIDORF, RAFAEL J. PASCUAL, and TOM SHIPPEY (eds). Old English Philology: Studies in Honour of R. D. Fulk.

LEONARD NEIDORF, RAFAEL J. PASCUAL, and TOM SHIPPEY (eds). Old English Philology: Studies in... In choosing a subject whose career has exemplified the fruitful pursuit of English and early Germanic philology, one could hardly do better than to consider R. D. Fulk. His substantial and influential body of work is firmly rooted in the exacting study of linguistic detail—especially Old English metrics and phonology—but the ultimate value of his oeuvre is much wider as he has made lasting contributions to the editing, the history, and the pedagogy of Old English literature. Alongside a myriad of article-length studies, Fulk is well known for his 1992 monograph, A History of Old English Meter, most often cited for developing a methodology for using metrics to date Old English poems. Fulk’s understanding of the evidential value of philology has also informed his editorial work, providing the necessary competence (and courage) for the revision (with R. E. Bjork and J. D. Niles) of F. Klaeber’s standard edition of Beowulf (2008). He has authored successful introductory textbooks for Old English (2014) and Middle English (2012), and, with Christopher Cain, A History of Old English Literature now in its second edition (2013). No current scholar of Old English literature can remain uninfluenced by Fulk’s publications. The festschrift under review constitutes an appropriate tribute to Rob Fulk by matching the rigour of his scholarship and, to a certain degree, its breadth. Of the 21 essays in the volume, the first (by Leonard Neidorf) and the last (by Tom Shippey) describe the nature of Fulk’s scholarship and its importance in the history of Anglo-Saxon studies. Unsurprisingly, eight of the remaining chapters focus on metrics, the area in which Fulk is most influential. Some of these papers adhere closely to the problems of metrical theory and analysis. For example, a synchronic approach to Old English meter shapes the essays by Rafael Pascual, ‘Sievers, Bliss, Fulk, and Old English Metrical Theory’ and Thomas Cable, ‘Ictus as Stress or Length: The Effect of Tempo’. In a more diachronic mode, Geoffrey Russom extends his view back to Proto-Germanic in his interrogation of ‘Metrical Complexity and Verse Placement in Beowulf’, while Donka Minkova moves in the opposite direction (‘Prosody-Meter Correspondences in Late Old English and Poema Morale’). Half of the metrical studies expand to adjacent fields of inquiry. Jun Terasawa addresses morphosyntax in ‘The Suppression of the Subjunctive in Beowulf: A Metrical Explanation’, and Leonard Neidorf picks up a Fulkian thread in ‘Metrical Criteria for the Emendation of Old English Poetic Texts’. Although all of the metrical studies are strong, this reviewer was most taken by the two papers linking metrics and stylistics. In ‘Alliterating Finite Verbs and the Origin of Rank in Old English Poetry’, Mark Griffith discovers that the alliterative patterning of finite verbs depends more upon register than upon syntax, thus placing Old English poetry closer to Middle English alliterative practice. Megan Hartman concentrates on a single poem, The Fortunes of Men, and demonstrates that the gnomic poet alters not just sentence structure, but also metrical structure, when he switches between gnomic and narrative discourse types. Following metrics, the next most popular topic in this volume is lexicography. Five papers present different types of word studies, some addressing groups of words, as in Dennis Cronan’s ‘The Poetics of Poetic Words in Old English’, others focusing on a single word, as in Daniel Donoghue’s semantic analysis of the word engel (‘Dream of the Rood 9b: A Cross as an Angel?’). Two essays argue from absence: George Clark (‘The Anglo-Saxons and Superbia: Finding a Word for it’) concluding that this particular Latin sin never found a consistent gloss in Old English, and Haruko Momma (‘Worm: A Lexical Approach to the Beowulf Manuscript’) noting the absence of earthworms in the Nowell Codex in favour of a more monstrous (and less institutionally Christian) wyrmcynn. Anatoly Liberman ponders the relationships between ‘Old English gelōme, gelōma, Modern English loom, lame, and Their Kin’. Considering Rob Fulk’s influence on the methods of dating texts, it would be unfortunate to find no dating studies here; luckily, the volume does not disappoint. Aaron Ecay and Susan Pintzuk approach the problem from a linguistic perspective (‘The Syntax of Old English Poetry and the Dating of Beowulf’), while Charles Wright offers an object lesson in how source study can date (and help to place) texts when he convincingly links Genesis A to the teachings of Theodore of Tarsus (‘The Fate of Lot’s Wife: A ‘Canterbury School’ Gloss in Genesis A’). Stefan Jurasinski is, wisely, a bit less confident in connecting a specific penitential text to Wulfstan in his ‘Wulfstan, Episcopal Authority, and the Handbook for the Use of a Confessor’. As another option for placing the origins of texts, Christopher Cain argues with admirable clarity that scribal use of the e-caudata graph might point to practices specific to certain ecclesiastical centres (‘Some Observations on e-caudata in Old English Texts’). The two remaining papers juxtapose analogues to specific poems. Andy Orchard (‘The Originality of Andreas’) describes ways in which the Andreas-poet composed in both traditional and innovative ways. In an interesting twist, Rory Naismith uses poetry to enhance our understanding of historical documents, rather than the reverse, when he demonstrates that the stylized, aristocratic depiction of wealth and exchange in Beowulf also underlies the representation of land exchange in Anglo-Saxon charters (‘The Economy of Beowulf’). The title of this book—Old English Philology—states simply and boldly what it contains. Like the scholar they honour, the contributors to the festschrift revel in the rigorous argumentation that the best philological work demands. As a result, the rewards of philological study, in this case its contributions to our understanding of numerous facets of Old English poetry, are also on full display. The editors are to be commended for bringing together such an impressive concentration of intellectual effort, and R. D. Fulk should be proud for having inspired it. © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press 2017; all rights reserved http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Review of English Studies Oxford University Press

LEONARD NEIDORF, RAFAEL J. PASCUAL, and TOM SHIPPEY (eds). Old English Philology: Studies in Honour of R. D. Fulk.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ou_press/leonard-neidorf-rafael-j-pascual-and-tom-shippey-eds-old-english-wyVL0A003G
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press 2017; all rights reserved
ISSN
0034-6551
eISSN
1471-6968
D.O.I.
10.1093/res/hgx074
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In choosing a subject whose career has exemplified the fruitful pursuit of English and early Germanic philology, one could hardly do better than to consider R. D. Fulk. His substantial and influential body of work is firmly rooted in the exacting study of linguistic detail—especially Old English metrics and phonology—but the ultimate value of his oeuvre is much wider as he has made lasting contributions to the editing, the history, and the pedagogy of Old English literature. Alongside a myriad of article-length studies, Fulk is well known for his 1992 monograph, A History of Old English Meter, most often cited for developing a methodology for using metrics to date Old English poems. Fulk’s understanding of the evidential value of philology has also informed his editorial work, providing the necessary competence (and courage) for the revision (with R. E. Bjork and J. D. Niles) of F. Klaeber’s standard edition of Beowulf (2008). He has authored successful introductory textbooks for Old English (2014) and Middle English (2012), and, with Christopher Cain, A History of Old English Literature now in its second edition (2013). No current scholar of Old English literature can remain uninfluenced by Fulk’s publications. The festschrift under review constitutes an appropriate tribute to Rob Fulk by matching the rigour of his scholarship and, to a certain degree, its breadth. Of the 21 essays in the volume, the first (by Leonard Neidorf) and the last (by Tom Shippey) describe the nature of Fulk’s scholarship and its importance in the history of Anglo-Saxon studies. Unsurprisingly, eight of the remaining chapters focus on metrics, the area in which Fulk is most influential. Some of these papers adhere closely to the problems of metrical theory and analysis. For example, a synchronic approach to Old English meter shapes the essays by Rafael Pascual, ‘Sievers, Bliss, Fulk, and Old English Metrical Theory’ and Thomas Cable, ‘Ictus as Stress or Length: The Effect of Tempo’. In a more diachronic mode, Geoffrey Russom extends his view back to Proto-Germanic in his interrogation of ‘Metrical Complexity and Verse Placement in Beowulf’, while Donka Minkova moves in the opposite direction (‘Prosody-Meter Correspondences in Late Old English and Poema Morale’). Half of the metrical studies expand to adjacent fields of inquiry. Jun Terasawa addresses morphosyntax in ‘The Suppression of the Subjunctive in Beowulf: A Metrical Explanation’, and Leonard Neidorf picks up a Fulkian thread in ‘Metrical Criteria for the Emendation of Old English Poetic Texts’. Although all of the metrical studies are strong, this reviewer was most taken by the two papers linking metrics and stylistics. In ‘Alliterating Finite Verbs and the Origin of Rank in Old English Poetry’, Mark Griffith discovers that the alliterative patterning of finite verbs depends more upon register than upon syntax, thus placing Old English poetry closer to Middle English alliterative practice. Megan Hartman concentrates on a single poem, The Fortunes of Men, and demonstrates that the gnomic poet alters not just sentence structure, but also metrical structure, when he switches between gnomic and narrative discourse types. Following metrics, the next most popular topic in this volume is lexicography. Five papers present different types of word studies, some addressing groups of words, as in Dennis Cronan’s ‘The Poetics of Poetic Words in Old English’, others focusing on a single word, as in Daniel Donoghue’s semantic analysis of the word engel (‘Dream of the Rood 9b: A Cross as an Angel?’). Two essays argue from absence: George Clark (‘The Anglo-Saxons and Superbia: Finding a Word for it’) concluding that this particular Latin sin never found a consistent gloss in Old English, and Haruko Momma (‘Worm: A Lexical Approach to the Beowulf Manuscript’) noting the absence of earthworms in the Nowell Codex in favour of a more monstrous (and less institutionally Christian) wyrmcynn. Anatoly Liberman ponders the relationships between ‘Old English gelōme, gelōma, Modern English loom, lame, and Their Kin’. Considering Rob Fulk’s influence on the methods of dating texts, it would be unfortunate to find no dating studies here; luckily, the volume does not disappoint. Aaron Ecay and Susan Pintzuk approach the problem from a linguistic perspective (‘The Syntax of Old English Poetry and the Dating of Beowulf’), while Charles Wright offers an object lesson in how source study can date (and help to place) texts when he convincingly links Genesis A to the teachings of Theodore of Tarsus (‘The Fate of Lot’s Wife: A ‘Canterbury School’ Gloss in Genesis A’). Stefan Jurasinski is, wisely, a bit less confident in connecting a specific penitential text to Wulfstan in his ‘Wulfstan, Episcopal Authority, and the Handbook for the Use of a Confessor’. As another option for placing the origins of texts, Christopher Cain argues with admirable clarity that scribal use of the e-caudata graph might point to practices specific to certain ecclesiastical centres (‘Some Observations on e-caudata in Old English Texts’). The two remaining papers juxtapose analogues to specific poems. Andy Orchard (‘The Originality of Andreas’) describes ways in which the Andreas-poet composed in both traditional and innovative ways. In an interesting twist, Rory Naismith uses poetry to enhance our understanding of historical documents, rather than the reverse, when he demonstrates that the stylized, aristocratic depiction of wealth and exchange in Beowulf also underlies the representation of land exchange in Anglo-Saxon charters (‘The Economy of Beowulf’). The title of this book—Old English Philology—states simply and boldly what it contains. Like the scholar they honour, the contributors to the festschrift revel in the rigorous argumentation that the best philological work demands. As a result, the rewards of philological study, in this case its contributions to our understanding of numerous facets of Old English poetry, are also on full display. The editors are to be commended for bringing together such an impressive concentration of intellectual effort, and R. D. Fulk should be proud for having inspired it. © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press 2017; all rights reserved

Journal

The Review of English StudiesOxford University Press

Published: Feb 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off