L’Univers de la création littéraire. Dans la chambre noire de l’écriture: ‘Hérodias’ de Flaubert. Par Philippe Willemart

L’Univers de la création littéraire. Dans la chambre noire de l’écriture: ‘Hérodias’... The appearance of a book-length study on the lesser-worked texts of a canonical author such as Flaubert always marks a high point of critical reflection and expectation. Hérodias is a particular case in point since it has failed to generate dedicated and extensive scholarly attention despite holding unquestionably key positions in Flaubert’s œuvre; this third and final text of the Trois contes is also the last work he completed for publication. In consequence, the lack of dedicated monographs on Hérodias highlights major critical oversights, even disfavour. In confronting both, Philippe Willemart therefore provides a major milestone in Flaubert studies, principally because he singles Hérodias out for itself. Such deliberate separation from the Trois contes as parts of a greater whole, and from Flaubert’s finished œuvre, makes it an exemplum of what his subtitle calls — in indirect homage to Roland Barthes and to Proust — ‘la chambre noire de l’écriture’. Who better than Willemart, a distinguished and longstanding genetic critic of Proust, to tackle the complex questions of ‘la rature’ (p. 49) and ‘l’inconscient du texte’ (p. 80; in italics in the original) as powerhouses for understanding the manuscripts of the mature Flaubert’s Hérodias? Willemart’s fine-grained close genetic reading of the ‘unseeable’ and the ‘unsayable’ in the opening folios of Flaubert’s conte therefore provides masterclass material for reading later folios of Hérodias (beyond the scope of this monograph), and for piloting genetic criticism itself to new levels of psycho-textual sophistication. By framing the final published version supremely as what a mature work is not — in this case its some fourteen avant-textual iterations — Willemart addresses how these already unwritten earlier forms exemplify a more properly Lacanian ‘inconscient génétique’ (p. 97). The intermeshing of Lacanian psychoanalysis with genetic approaches makes this pivotal study of Hérodias important precisely by returning psycho-criticism to the avant-texte(s), not their author, and to what marks its erasure processes as Flaubertian. For specialist genetic and non-genetic critics of Flaubert alike, Willemart’s study therefore calls us to attend even more assiduously to Hérodias as a ‘text’ quintessentially about unmaking, including its own. Critics of all stripes must now look seriously again at the final published version for the unseeable, unspeakable, and unsayable in its literal and figurative chambres noires (such as Iaokanann’s prison or the darkness of the morning after the night before of Antipas’s feast) that overtly discomfit the reader’s gaze and understanding of the scandalous final line/word (‘Comme elle [la tête] était très lourde, ils la portaient alternativement’). After reading Willemart it becomes impossible for the Flaubert specialist not to remake their own further reading of Hérodias, particularly if s/he ultimately rejects his approach in favour of the intertextual Flaubert and consummate producer of encyclopaedic published works. This study therefore importantly paves the way, yet still leaves much room, for alternative monographs entirely devoted to Hérodias. Most pressing of all remains the need for an accessible guide to the very final Hérodias to enlighten new and longstanding readers on how to read Flaubert’s most impossible, and meaning-defying, work. © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for French Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices) http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png French Studies Oxford University Press

L’Univers de la création littéraire. Dans la chambre noire de l’écriture: ‘Hérodias’ de Flaubert. Par Philippe Willemart

French Studies , Volume 72 (3) – Jul 1, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ou_press/l-univers-de-la-cr-ation-litt-raire-dans-la-chambre-noire-de-l-criture-aRIs0V7Nov
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for French Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
ISSN
0016-1128
eISSN
1468-2931
D.O.I.
10.1093/fs/kny115
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The appearance of a book-length study on the lesser-worked texts of a canonical author such as Flaubert always marks a high point of critical reflection and expectation. Hérodias is a particular case in point since it has failed to generate dedicated and extensive scholarly attention despite holding unquestionably key positions in Flaubert’s œuvre; this third and final text of the Trois contes is also the last work he completed for publication. In consequence, the lack of dedicated monographs on Hérodias highlights major critical oversights, even disfavour. In confronting both, Philippe Willemart therefore provides a major milestone in Flaubert studies, principally because he singles Hérodias out for itself. Such deliberate separation from the Trois contes as parts of a greater whole, and from Flaubert’s finished œuvre, makes it an exemplum of what his subtitle calls — in indirect homage to Roland Barthes and to Proust — ‘la chambre noire de l’écriture’. Who better than Willemart, a distinguished and longstanding genetic critic of Proust, to tackle the complex questions of ‘la rature’ (p. 49) and ‘l’inconscient du texte’ (p. 80; in italics in the original) as powerhouses for understanding the manuscripts of the mature Flaubert’s Hérodias? Willemart’s fine-grained close genetic reading of the ‘unseeable’ and the ‘unsayable’ in the opening folios of Flaubert’s conte therefore provides masterclass material for reading later folios of Hérodias (beyond the scope of this monograph), and for piloting genetic criticism itself to new levels of psycho-textual sophistication. By framing the final published version supremely as what a mature work is not — in this case its some fourteen avant-textual iterations — Willemart addresses how these already unwritten earlier forms exemplify a more properly Lacanian ‘inconscient génétique’ (p. 97). The intermeshing of Lacanian psychoanalysis with genetic approaches makes this pivotal study of Hérodias important precisely by returning psycho-criticism to the avant-texte(s), not their author, and to what marks its erasure processes as Flaubertian. For specialist genetic and non-genetic critics of Flaubert alike, Willemart’s study therefore calls us to attend even more assiduously to Hérodias as a ‘text’ quintessentially about unmaking, including its own. Critics of all stripes must now look seriously again at the final published version for the unseeable, unspeakable, and unsayable in its literal and figurative chambres noires (such as Iaokanann’s prison or the darkness of the morning after the night before of Antipas’s feast) that overtly discomfit the reader’s gaze and understanding of the scandalous final line/word (‘Comme elle [la tête] était très lourde, ils la portaient alternativement’). After reading Willemart it becomes impossible for the Flaubert specialist not to remake their own further reading of Hérodias, particularly if s/he ultimately rejects his approach in favour of the intertextual Flaubert and consummate producer of encyclopaedic published works. This study therefore importantly paves the way, yet still leaves much room, for alternative monographs entirely devoted to Hérodias. Most pressing of all remains the need for an accessible guide to the very final Hérodias to enlighten new and longstanding readers on how to read Flaubert’s most impossible, and meaning-defying, work. © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for French Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices)

Journal

French StudiesOxford University Press

Published: Jul 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off