Abstract Coevolution is a major driver of speciation in many host-associated symbionts. In the termite-protist digestive symbiosis, the protists are vertically inherited by anal feeding among nest mates. Lower termites (all termite families except Termitidae) and their symbionts have broadly co-diversified over ~170 million yr. However, this inference is based mainly on the restricted distribution of certain protist genera to certain termite families. With the exception of one study, which demonstrated congruent phylogenies for the protist Pseudotrichonympha and its Rhinotermitidae hosts, coevolution in this symbiosis has not been investigated with molecular methods. Here we have characterized the hindgut symbiotic protists (Phylum Parabasalia) across the genus Zootermopsis (Archotermopsidae) using single cell isolation, molecular phylogenetics, and high-throughput amplicon sequencing. We report that the deepest divergence in the Zootermopsis phylogeny (Zootermopsis laticeps [Banks; Isoptera: Termopsidae]) corresponds with a divergence in three of the hindgut protist species. However, the crown Zootermopsis taxa (Zootermopsis angusticollis [Hagen; Isoptera: Termopsidae], Z. nevadensis nevadensis [Hagen; Isoptera: Termopsidae], and Z. nevadensis nuttingi [Haverty & Thorne; Isoptera: Termopsidae]) share the same protist species, with no evidence of co-speciation under our methods. We interpret this pattern as incomplete co-cladogenesis, though the possibility of symbiont exchange cannot be entirely ruled out. This is the first molecular evidence that identical communities of termite-associated protist species can inhabit multiple distinct host species. Symbiotic mutualisms are ubiquitous in nature, and can dramatically impact the evolution of all species involved in such an association (Rosenberg and Rosenberg 2016). This is especially apparent with mutualisms between multicellular hosts and their microbial symbionts. A common prediction in the field of symbiology is that the divergence of a host should result in the reciprocal divergence of any vertically transmitted mutualistic symbionts (i.e., symbionts that are transmitted from parents to offspring), eventually leading to co-cladogenesis between the hosts and symbionts (Bright and Bulgheresi 2010). Co-cladogenesis has been observed as predicted in some symbiotic mutualisms, such as a variety of associations between insects and bacteria (e.g., Moran and Baumann 1994, Lo et al. 2003, Kikuchi et al. 2009, Kleinschmidt and Kölsch 2011), flatworms and bacteria (Gruber-Vodicka et al. 2011), plants and endophytic fungi (Clay and Schardl 2002), Azolla water ferns and cyanobacteria (Zheng et al. 1999), flagellated protists and endosymbiotic bacteria (Noda et al. 2007, Ikeda-Ohtsubo and Brune 2009), and lower termites and flagellated protists (Noda et al. 2007). Despite theoretical expectations, co-cladogenesis is not a given evolutionary outcome. Incongruencies can arise between host and symbiont phylogenies because of occasional horizontal transmission of mutualistic microbes among hosts or from environmental sources (Bright and Bulgheresi 2010). Co-cladogenesis is therefore not always apparent on species or genus levels, and congruent patterns often emerge only when examining taxa at deeper phylogenetic levels (Aanen et al. 2007, Arnold et al. 2010). Clearly, symbioses need to be examined on a case-by-case basis, to better understand the coevolutionary processes that occur between hosts and mutualistic symbionts. The associations between lower termites (i.e., all termites that do not belong to the phylogenetically derived family Termitidae) and their gut microbes provide ideal systems with which to study coevolution and co-cladogenesis between hosts and mutualistic microbes. Lower termites are a diverse and globally widespread group of insects that consume recalcitrant plant materials as a source of carbohydrates. In order to digest cellulose, termites depend on a diverse assemblage of bacteria and archaea, as well as two groups of protists from the supergroup Excavata (parabasalids, which belong to the Phylum Parabasalia, and oxymonads, which belong to the Class Oxymonadea, Phylum Preaxostyla), that are present in termite hindguts (Ohkuma and Brune 2010). In addition to facilitating the digestion of cellulose, the microbial symbionts benefit their hosts in other ways, e.g., by suppressing spores of entomopathogenic fungi that are ingested by the insects (Peterson and Scharf 2016). In turn, the termites provide food and suitable environments for the microbes to live and reproduce. The association between the lower termites and protists is ancient, as the termites and protists have coevolved since the divergence between wood roaches (Cryptocercus [Scudder; Blattodea: Cryptocercidae]) and lower termites ~170 million yr (Bourguignon et al. 2015). The protists are transferred intergenerationally via proctodeal trophallaxis (i.e., the transmission of hindgut fluids containing the microbiota from a donor termite to a recipient; Nalepa et al. 2001). As expected for vertically transmitted microbes, there is evidence that the community assembly of protists within a termite hindgut depends on the termite host’s phylogenetic placement. Early surveys of the gut microbiomes of termites, which were based solely on cell morphology, suggested that some closely related termite species harbor similar sets of protist species (Kirby 1934, 1937; Yamin 1979). However, molecular tools led to the discovery of higher than expected protist diversities in many termite guts, including numerous cryptic species (Stingl and Brune 2003, Harper et al. 2009, Tai et al. 2013). The discovery of the previously unknown diversity, combined with evidence of strict co-cladogenesis in many other vertically-inherited symbiotic associations (Nieberding and Olivieri 2007, de Vienne et al. 2013), led to the assumption that each individual species of lower termite contains its own unique assemblage of hindgut protists, while individual protist species are associated with only one termite species (Tai et al. 2015). In addition, it is generally assumed that protist communities are consistent across different populations of individual termite species (Kirby 1934). However, these paradigms have been largely untested. Although vertical transmission is the primary means by which the gut fauna are transmitted, there is some evidence that horizontal transmission has occurred at least once in the evolutionary history of lower termites. Termites in the genus Reticulitermes (Holmgren; Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) carry a symbiont assemblage that is dramatically different from the other termites in their family, Rhinotermitidae, suggesting that Reticulitermes may have replaced their gut communities via an ancient horizontal transmission event (Kitade and Matsumoto 1998, Kitade 2004, Tai et al. 2015). In addition, termites in the family Serritermitidae harbor a dramatically different flagellate community from their close relatives in the Rhinotermitidae, suggesting that the gut community in the Serritermitidae may have been shaped by horizontal transfer (Radek et al. 2017). However, it is unknown whether horizontal transfers of gut protists have occurred in lower termites outside of these examples. The distribution of protist taxa across termite taxa is broadly consistent with vertical transmission, e.g., the genera Pseudotrichonympha (Grassi & Foá; Trichonymphida: Teranymphidae) and Holomastigotoides (Grassi & Foá; Trichonymphida: Teranymphidae) are restricted to the Rhinotermitidae, while the protist families Calonymphidae and Devescovinidae are restricted to the Kalotermitidae (Yamin 1979). Furthermore, an 18S ribosomal RNA amplicon survey of hindgut communities across lower termites and Cryptocercus revealed that the communities are structured by host phylogeny, not biogeography (Tai et al. 2015). Therefore, despite the theoretical possibility of horizontal transmission, vertical inheritance is much more important to the evolution of protist communities (Yamin 1979, Kitade 2004, Rahman et al. 2015, Tai et al. 2015). Termites in the genus Zootermopsis (Emerson; Isoptera: Termopsidae) provide a tractable system with which to test for co-cladogenesis. This genus contains only three species, each of which is present only in western North America: Zootermopsis angusticollis (Hagen; Isoptera: Termopsidae), Zootermopsis nevadensis (Hagen; Isoptera: Termopsidae), and Zootermopsis laticeps (Banks; Isoptera: Termopsidae) (Thorne et al. 1993). Z. nevadensis is subdivided into two subspecies (Z. nevadensis nevadensis and Z. nevadensis nuttingi) based on differences in cuticular hydrocarbons (Haverty et al. 1988) as well as aggressive behavior exhibited between members of the two subspecies (Haverty and Thorne 1989). Z. angusticollis and Z. nevadensis nuttingi have nearly identical ranges along the west coast of the United States (Fig. 1), while Z. nevadensis nevadensis has a range that is further inland and partially overlaps with the ranges of Z. angusticollis and Z. nevadensis nuttingi (Thorne et al. 1993). Z. laticeps is geographically isolated from the other species, with a range in central and southern Arizona (Thorne et al. 1993). Fig. 1. View largeDownload slide Approximate ranges of the four Zootermopsis taxa based on Thorne et al. (1993). Red dots indicate the locations from which the samples were collected for the study by Tai et al. (2013): 1 – Vancouver; and the present study: 2 – El Dorado National Forest, 3 – Monterey, 4 – San Bernardino, 5 – Gray Hawk Nature Center. Fig. 1. View largeDownload slide Approximate ranges of the four Zootermopsis taxa based on Thorne et al. (1993). Red dots indicate the locations from which the samples were collected for the study by Tai et al. (2013): 1 – Vancouver; and the present study: 2 – El Dorado National Forest, 3 – Monterey, 4 – San Bernardino, 5 – Gray Hawk Nature Center. Currently, Z. angusticollis is the only species within the genus Zootermopsis with a well-documented protist community based on both morphological and molecular data, although all four taxa have been investigated by morphological methods (Yamin 1979). Tai et al. (2013) identified seven species of parabasalids associated with Z. angusticollis in Vancouver, British Columbia, based on morphology and molecular phylogenetics: Trichomitopsis minor (Tai & Keeling; Trichomonadida: Trichomonadidae), Trichomitopsis parvus (Tai & Keeling; Trichomonadida: Trichomonadidae), Trichomitopsis termopsidis (Cleveland; Trichomonadida: Trichomonadidae), Trichonympha campanula (Kofoid & Swezy; Trichonymphida: Trichonymphidae), Trichonympha collaris (Kirby; Trichonymphida: Trichonymphidae), Trichonympha postcylindrica (Tai & Keeling; Trichonymphida: Trichonymphidae), and Trichonympha sphaerica Kofoid & Swezy; Trichonymphida: Trichonymphidae. Two additional parabasalid species, Hexamastix termopsidis Kirby; Honigbergiellida: Honigbergiellidae and Tricercomitus termopsidis (Kirby; Honigbergiella: Tricercomitidae), and an oxymonad species, Streblomastix strix (Kofoid & Swezy; Oxymonadida: Streblomastigidae), are also known to inhabit this termite (Kofoid and Swezy 1919, Kirby 1930). The same four species of Trichonympha were also found in Z. nevadensis (most likely Z. nevadensis nevadensis based on the collection locations of the termite, Mount Pinos in the Los Padros National Forest, California, and the Chilao Flats Campground in the Angeles National Forest, California; Ikeda-Ohtsubo and Brune 2009, Zheng et al. 2015). However, the other protists in the Z. nevadensis nevadensis community were not investigated, and to date no other Zootermopsis taxa have been examined using molecular methods. In this study, we characterized the community of parabasalid protists associated with termites in the genus Zootermopsis. We used microscopy, single cell isolation, and Sanger sequencing to identify the species of Trichomitopsis and Trichonympha present in the guts of each Zootermopsis species. In addition, we used high-throughput amplicon sequencing to determine the overall composition of the parabasalid communities, and to test for the presence of cryptic species that were potentially missed using Sanger sequencing. Finally, we compared the phylogeny of the termites with those of the associated protists to test the hypothesis that vertical transmission of obligate protist symbionts should have resulted in co-cladogenesis. Materials and Methods Termite and Parabasalid Collections Z. angusticollis and Z. nevadensis nuttingi individuals were obtained from colonies maintained by one of the authors (J.R.L.) at Arizona State University. The Z. angusticollis colonies were originally collected in Monterey, California, on 24 July 2016, and San Bernardino, California, on 31 January 2009 (Fig. 1), while the Z. nevadensis nuttingi colonies were originally collected in Monterey on 27 May 2014. Z. nevadensis nevadensis individuals were collected from the rotting log of a ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa [Douglas; Pinales: Pinaceae]) in El Dorado National Forest in California on 18 November 2016. Z. laticeps individuals were collected from dead branches of live Freemont’s cottonwoods (Populus fremontii [Watson; Malpighiales: Salicaceae]) along the San Pedro river in the Gray Hawk Nature Center in Arizona on 22 September 2016. Termite identities were confirmed based on morphology and cuticular hydrocarbon profiles which were assessed using gas chromatography (except for Z. laticeps, which was identified based on morphology). Cuticular hydrocarbons from individual termite workers were extracted with hexane of which 1 µl was injected into an Agilent 6890N GC (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) coupled with an Agilent 5975 mass selective detector, operated in splitless injection mode with helium as carrier gas at 1 ml min−1 flow rate. The GC was fitted with a 30-m × 0.25-mm (ID) × 0.1-μm DB-1MS non-polar column (Agilent). The oven temperature was programmed to rise from 60 to 200°C at 40°C min−1 after an initial delay of 2 min including a splitless time of 0.5 min. Subsequently the temperature rose from 200 to 320°C at 5°C min−1. Injector temperature was 260°C, MS quad 150°C, MS source 230°C, and transfer line 300°C. Compound identification was based on fragmentation patterns, retention time and comparison with previously identified compounds in the Zootermopsis species and subspecies (Haverty et al. 1988, Haverty and Thorne 1989). Numbers of termites processed for this study are summarized in Supplementary Table S1. The hindguts were removed from live termites, placed in 50 µl Ringer’s solution (8.5 g NaCl, 0.20 g KCl, 0.20 g CaCl2, NaHCO3 per liter, HiMedia Laboratories), and crushed to form mixtures, or ‘slurries’. Parabasalid cells from the slurries were visualized at 200× magnification using a Zeiss Axio Vert A1 inverted microscope (Zeiss). Individual Trichonympha and Trichomitopsis cells were collected and manipulated using glass capillaries. After washing individual cells once or twice in Ringer’s solution, the cells were photographed and placed in individual 500 µl microcentrifuge tubes. The single cells, the remaining hindgut slurries, and the termite thoraxes were stored at −20°C until DNA extractions. Numbers of cells collected and identified in this study are summarized in Supplementary Table S1. DNA Extraction, Amplification, and Sequencing of Single Cells and Insects We extracted DNA from the single cells, hindgut slurries, and termite thoraxes using the Epicentre MasterPure DNA purification kit following the manufacturer’s protocol (Epicentre, Madison, WI). We then amplified a near full-length fragment of the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) of the single cells using the primers PF1 (Keeling 2002) and FAD4 (Deane et al. 1998). We used SSU because it is a reliable marker for distinguishing between parabasalid species (Čepička et al. 2017). Each reaction contained 15 µl of EconoTaq PLUS GREEN 2× Master Mix (Lucigen Corporation, Middleton, WI), 3 µl of each primer, 7 µl of dH2O, and 2 µl of template for a total reaction volume of 30 µl. PCR reactions consisted of an initial denaturing step of 95°C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 53°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 90 s, and ending with a step of 72°C for 7 min. A nested PCR was then conducted on the PCR product from the initial amplification using the primers GGF and GGR (Gile et al. 2011). The nested PCR followed the same amplification protocol as the initial PCR reaction. PCR products from the nested reaction were run in 1% agarose gels, stained using GelGreen (Biotium, Fremont, CA), and visualized under a blue light. Visible bands of ~1,500 base pairs were cut from the gel, and DNA was extracted from the excised gel pieces using a NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). Because individual parabasalid cells often contain multiple distinct SSU copies, the gel-extracted DNA was cloned using a TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK). Between two and five clones per cell were sequenced on an Applied Biosystems 3730 capillary sequencer by the DNA Laboratory at Arizona State University. Sequences of the two most phylogenetically divergent clones from a single cell of each parabasalid-host species combination (the sequences used to generate the Trichonympha and Trichomitopsis phylograms; see Results) were deposited in GenBank (accession numbers MF477204-MF477235). For the termites, we amplified a fragment of the COI gene (using the primers LepF1 and LepR1; Hebert et al. 2004) and the COII gene (using the primers A-tLeu and B-tLys; Wirth et al. 1999). Reactions contained the same reagent volumes as the single cell reactions. PCR reactions consisted of an initial denaturing step of 95°C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 43°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 90 s, and ending with a step of 72°C for 7 min. PCR products were sequenced directly on both strands as above. Sequences of each unique termite haplotype were deposited in GenBank (accession numbers MF477188-MF477203). Phylogenetic Analyses—Parabasalids We separated the parabasalid sequences into two datasets: one for species of Trichonympha and one for species of Trichomitopsis. For the Trichonympha dataset, we compared the sequences from Zootermopsis with eight previously published sequences of Trichonympha species (two sequences per Trichonympha species) isolated from Z. angusticollis in Vancouver (Tai et al. 2013), as well as ten sequences of Trichonympha species isolated from termite species in the genera Hodotermopsis (Holmgren; Isoptera: Termopsidae) and Reticulitermes (Ohkuma et al. 1998, 2000; Ikeda-Ohtsubo et al. 2007, Ikeda-Ohtsubo and Brune 2009, Supplementary Table S2). The Trichonympha sequences from these termite species form a sister clade to the Trichonympha present in Zootermopsis species (James et al. 2013b). In addition, the Trichonympha dataset contained three sequences of Staurojoenina (Grassi; Trichonymphida: Staurojoeninidae) species (Ohkuma et al. 2005, Gile et al. 2013) which were included as an outgroup. For the Trichomitopsis dataset, we compared the sequences from Zootermopsis with six previously published sequences of Trichomitopsis species (two per species), as well as five sequences of Pseudotrypanosoma giganteum (Grassi; Trichomonadida: Trichomonadidae) (Supplementary Table S2; Keeling et al. 1998). Both datasets were separately aligned using MAFFT v. 7 (Katoh and Standley 2013) and ambiguously aligned regions were removed by eye. We conducted both maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses to determine the phylogenetic relationships among the parabasalids within each dataset. ML analyses were conducted using RAxML v. 8.2.9 (Stamatakis 2014), while BI analyses were conducted using Mr. Bayes v. 3.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012). ML and BI analyses both followed a GTR+Γ substitution model. Statistical support for the nodes in the best ML tree was generated using 1,000 bootstrap replicates. For the BI analyses, four Markov chain Monte Carlo chains were run with 5,000,000 generations. Posterior probabilities were then generated by sampling a tree every 100 generations. The program Tracer v. 1.6 (Rambaut et al. 2014) was used to estimate the burn-in value, and trees generated in the burn-in phase (the first 25% of trees in each dataset) were discarded. After the individual cells were identified, mean p-distances were calculated using MEGA 7 (Kumar et al. 2015) to determine the diversity of SSU sequences within individual cells. In addition, p-distances were calculated to compare the diversities of sequences of individual parabasalid species within and among the host termite taxa. Phylogenetic Analyses—Termites We first analyzed the COI and COII regions separately to determine if the phylogenies of the two gene regions were congruent. We compared the COI dataset with five previously published sequences of COI from Z. nevadensis nuttingi and Z. angusticollis (Booth et al. 2012), as well as a sequence of COI from Archotermopsis wroughtoni (Desneux; Isoptera: Termopsidae) (Legendre et al. 2008) which was included as an outgroup. In addition, we aligned the COII dataset with a sequence of COII from Archotermopsis wroughtoni (Legendre et al. 2008). The datasets were aligned using MAFFT. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted following the same protocol as with the parabasalid datasets. After determining that the two single gene phylogenies are congruent (data not shown), we conducted the above analyses on the concatenated dataset. High-Throughput Sequencing and Bioinformatics Analyses The protist hindgut communities of Zootermopsis taxa listed above were also investigated by high-throughput amplicon sequencing. The V4-V5 regions of the protist SSU genes were amplified using the primers ParaF and ParaR (Jasso-Selles et al. 2017). These primers yield an approximately 450 bp amplicon, depending on species, which is roughly 30% of the total SSU length. Amplicons were sequenced using 2 × 300 paired end chemistry on the Illumina MiSeq platform at MR DNA (Shallowater, TX). We assembled the forward and reverse reads with Pandaseq (Masella et al. 2012) using a minimum overlap of 45 bp. The reconstructed sequences were then demultiplexed using QIIME v.1.9 (Caporaso et al. 2010), while barcodes and primers were trimmed with Cutadapt (Martin 2011). For each sample, the reads were dereplicated with vsearch v. 2.0.2 (Rognes et al. 2016) and clustered in operational taxonomical units (OTUs) with SWARM 2 (Mahé et al. 2015). SWARM builds clusters using a local clustering threshold (d) instead of an arbitrary global clustering threshold. Different clustering thresholds were tested for each sample with a range between d = 1 and d = 15, in order to find the most accurate characterization of the parabasalid community for each sample. Chimeras were then detected de novo with vsearch (Rognes et al. 2016). Only OTUs that represented at least 0.5% of the total clean reads were considered for taxonomic assignment and phylogenetic analysis. Taxonomy was assigned using a custom parabasalid SSU sequence reference file using RDP Classifier 2.2 (Wang et al. 2007) as implemented in QIIME 1.9. Unclassified OTUs were manually blasted against the NCBI nucleotide database (GenBank). The most abundant sequences (OTU representatives) from each cluster (OTU) were aligned with all the Sanger sequences obtained in this study, as well as sequences from closely related species that were available on GenBank (Hampl et al. 2004, Čepička et al. 2010, James et al. 2013a, Smejkalová et al. 2014), using MAFFT (Katoh and Standley 2013). The ends of the alignments were trimmed manually using MEGA. Based on the taxon assignments, four different phylogenetic trees were built: one for Trichonympha OTUs, one for Trichomitopsis, one for Hexamastix, and one for Tricercomitus. ML trees were constructed for each dataset in RAXML, using the GTRGAMMA model, with statistical support for nodes given by percentage of 1,000 total bootstrap replicates. Results Molecular Diversity and Phylogeny of Zootermopsis Cuticular hydrocarbon analyses matched previously published hydrocarbon profiles for each species and subspecies tested (Supplementary Fig. S1, Supplementary Table S3; Haverty et al. 1988, Haverty and Thorne 1989). Based on phylogenetic analyses the Zootermopsis individuals that we collected branched where expected (Fig. 2; Broughton and Kistner 1991, Thorne et al. 1993), supporting their identification based on morphology, cuticular hydrocarbon profiles, and collection location. Z. nevadensis nevadensis and Z. nevadensis nuttingi branched together with strong support, while Z. angusticollis was closely related (with strong support) to the Z. nevadensis subspecies. Z. laticeps formed the deepest branch in the Zootermopsis phylogeny. These nodes were also well supported in the individual COI and COII phylogenies, although the ML support was lower in the COI phylogeny relative to the COII and concatenated phylogenies. Fig. 2. View largeDownload slide Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogram of Zootermopsis termites based on concatenated sequences of COI and COII. Archotermopsis wroughtoni is included as an outgroup. Bolded taxon labels represent sequences that were generated in this study. Genbank accession numbers are included for previously published sequences. Values at nodes represent ML bootstrap values and Bayesian Inference (BI) posterior probabilities. Zootermopsis taxa are color coded as for Fig. 1. The final, trimmed, concatenated alignment of the Zootermopsis COI and COII genes had 1,326 sites of which 358 were variable. Fig. 2. View largeDownload slide Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogram of Zootermopsis termites based on concatenated sequences of COI and COII. Archotermopsis wroughtoni is included as an outgroup. Bolded taxon labels represent sequences that were generated in this study. Genbank accession numbers are included for previously published sequences. Values at nodes represent ML bootstrap values and Bayesian Inference (BI) posterior probabilities. Zootermopsis taxa are color coded as for Fig. 1. The final, trimmed, concatenated alignment of the Zootermopsis COI and COII genes had 1,326 sites of which 358 were variable. Hindgut Protist Community of Zootermopsis The symbionts associated with Z. angusticollis collected in Monterey and San Bernardino closely resembled those described from the Z. angusticollis collected in Vancouver (Tai et al. 2013). Based on morphology, Sanger sequencing of single cells and high-throughput amplicon sequencing of whole termite hindguts (Figs. 3 and 4; Supplementary Figs. S1 and S2), we detected all four described Trichonympha species and all three described Trichomitopsis species. The only exception was the Monterey population lacked T. campanula according to both single cell isolation and high-throughput amplicon sequencing data. In addition, we observed Tricercomitus termopsidis and Hexamastix termopsidis in both populations of Z. angusticollis. Altogether this indicates a nearly identical symbiont community between the three geographically distinct collection locations of Z. angusticollis. Fig. 3. View largeDownload slide (a) ML phylogram of Trichonympha species based on near full-length SSU rRNA gene sequences from individually isolated cells. Of the sequences obtained in this study, only two clones from one cell of each parabasalid species-host species combination were included in this tree (shown in bold). The sequences are color coded according to host species, following the color scheme in Fig. 1. Staurojoenina sequences were included as an outgroup. Values at nodes represent ML bootstrap values (when greater than 75) and BI posterior probabilities (when greater than 0.9). The final, trimmed alignment had 41 taxa and 1,492 sites (635 were variable). (b–g) Differential interference contrast micrographs of Trichonympha cells collected from Z. nevadensis nevadensis (b–e) and Z. laticeps (f–g): (b) T. campanula, (c) T. collaris, (d) T. postcylindrica, (e) T. sphaerica, (f) Trichonympha sp. 1, (g) Trichonympha sp. 2. Scale bars represent 50 μm. Fig. 3. View largeDownload slide (a) ML phylogram of Trichonympha species based on near full-length SSU rRNA gene sequences from individually isolated cells. Of the sequences obtained in this study, only two clones from one cell of each parabasalid species-host species combination were included in this tree (shown in bold). The sequences are color coded according to host species, following the color scheme in Fig. 1. Staurojoenina sequences were included as an outgroup. Values at nodes represent ML bootstrap values (when greater than 75) and BI posterior probabilities (when greater than 0.9). The final, trimmed alignment had 41 taxa and 1,492 sites (635 were variable). (b–g) Differential interference contrast micrographs of Trichonympha cells collected from Z. nevadensis nevadensis (b–e) and Z. laticeps (f–g): (b) T. campanula, (c) T. collaris, (d) T. postcylindrica, (e) T. sphaerica, (f) Trichonympha sp. 1, (g) Trichonympha sp. 2. Scale bars represent 50 μm. Fig. 4. View largeDownload slide (a) ML phylogram of Trichomitopsis species based on near full-length SSU rRNA gene sequences from individually isolated cells. The tree was generated and labeled following the same criteria as Fig. 3, except that sequences of Pseudotrypanosoma giganteum were included as an outgroup. The final trimmed alignment had 23 taxa and 1,483 sites (160 were variable). (b–e) Differential interference contrast micrographs of cells collected from Z. nevadensis nevadensis (b–d) and Z. laticeps (e): (b) Trichomitopsis minor, (c) Trichomitopsis parvus, (d) Trichomitopsis termopsidis, (e) Trichomitopsis sp. 1. Scale bars represent 20 μm. Fig. 4. View largeDownload slide (a) ML phylogram of Trichomitopsis species based on near full-length SSU rRNA gene sequences from individually isolated cells. The tree was generated and labeled following the same criteria as Fig. 3, except that sequences of Pseudotrypanosoma giganteum were included as an outgroup. The final trimmed alignment had 23 taxa and 1,483 sites (160 were variable). (b–e) Differential interference contrast micrographs of cells collected from Z. nevadensis nevadensis (b–d) and Z. laticeps (e): (b) Trichomitopsis minor, (c) Trichomitopsis parvus, (d) Trichomitopsis termopsidis, (e) Trichomitopsis sp. 1. Scale bars represent 20 μm. We additionally inspected the hindgut communities of both subspecies of Z. nevadensis, Z. nevadensis nuttingi and Z. nevadensis nevadensis. For Z. nevadensis nuttingi and Z. nevadensis nevadensis, we observed the same range of Trichonympha and Trichomitopsis morphotypes as for Z. angusticollis (Figs. 3 and 4), with the exception of T. termopsidis in Z. nevadensis nuttingi, which was present in termites from San Bernardino but not from Monterey. We examined the guts of three separately collected colonies of Z. nevadensis nuttingi from the same area using high-throughput sequencing to test whether the missing T. termopsidis cells were a colony-level or population-level discrepancy. The parabasalid species was absent from all three colonies, suggesting that T. termopsidis was absent from the Monterey population of Z. nevadensis nuttingi. Surprisingly, sequences obtained from single isolated cells of each parabasalid morphotype in the two Z. nevadensis subspecies were nearly identical to those from their counterparts in Z. angusticollis (Figs. 3 and 4), strongly suggesting that the same parabasalid species are present across these taxa. However, we also observed significant variability among SSU sequences from each parabasalid species (Fig. 5), even retrieving distinct sequences from a single isolated cell (Figs. 3 and 4). This is consistent with previous reports of intraspecific and even intragenomic SSU sequence variation in parabasalids, though some of this variation is likely due to amplification errors (Saldarriaga et al. 2011, Tai et al. 2013). Fig. 5. View largeDownload slide Intraspecific and intragenomic SSU rRNA gene sequence variability in parabasalid symbionts of Zootermopsis according to uncorrected pairwise distances (p-distances). Minimum and maximum p-distances in each category are given by red dashes. Means and standard deviations are given by circles and error bars, respectively. For each parabasalid species, circle color indicates category of pairwise comparison: blue represents p-distances between clones from the same cells, orange represents p-distances between clones from different cells within the same host species, and white represents p-distances between clones from different host species. Fig. 5. View largeDownload slide Intraspecific and intragenomic SSU rRNA gene sequence variability in parabasalid symbionts of Zootermopsis according to uncorrected pairwise distances (p-distances). Minimum and maximum p-distances in each category are given by red dashes. Means and standard deviations are given by circles and error bars, respectively. For each parabasalid species, circle color indicates category of pairwise comparison: blue represents p-distances between clones from the same cells, orange represents p-distances between clones from different cells within the same host species, and white represents p-distances between clones from different host species. In order to determine whether the intraspecific SSU sequence variability was equal within and across hosts (indicating the same species present in each host) or greater across hosts than within hosts (suggesting incipient cladogenesis), we computed uncorrected pairwise distances (p-distances) for all clones sequenced in this study (Fig. 5; Supplementary Table S1). The p-distances, which correspond to the number of nucleotide differences in a pairwise comparison divided by the total number of nucleotides (in our case, a p-distance of 0.003 corresponds to five nucleotides difference), ranged from 0 to 0.041 within individual cells and from 0 to 0.053 among cells of a given species from a single host. The greatest sequence variability (i.e., highest observed within-cell and within-species p-distances) was observed in T. collaris followed by T. sphaerica (Fig. 5; Supplementary Table S1). The other parabasalid species showed similar lower levels of sequence variability. Meanwhile, the p-distances measured from a single protist species across host species ranged from only 0 to 0.058, nearly identical to the maximum within-host p-distances. We accordingly conclude that the same Trichonympha and Trichomitopsis species are present in Z. angusticollis and both subspecies of Z. nevadensis. The symbionts present in Z. laticeps differed from those present in the other Zootermopsis species and subspecies (hereafter referred to collectively as the ‘west coast taxa’) based on molecular data (Figs. 3 and 4). Previous morphology-based studies of the Z. laticeps hindgut community identified one species of Trichonympha (T. campanula) and one species of Trichomitopsis (T. termopsidis) along with Tricercomitus termopsidis and Hexamastix laticeps (Kirby 1930, 1931, 1932). We found two species of Trichonympha and one species of Trichomitopsis, none of which belonged to the previously identified species according to molecular data. These distinct species are referred to here as Trichonympha sp. 1, which branches sister to T. campanula, Trichonympha sp. 2, sister to T. postcylindrica (Fig. 3), and Trichomitopsis sp. 1, sister to T. parvus (Fig. 4). The observed species had comparably high intraspecific SSU sequence diversity to the Trichonympha and Trichomitopsis species from the west coast taxa (Supplementary Table S1). None of the parabasalid symbionts of the west coast taxa were found in Z. laticeps. High-Throughput SSU rRNA Gene Amplicon Sequencing The Zootermopsis protist symbiont identities revealed by deep amplicon sequencing were consistent with the Sanger sequences from isolated cells (Supplementary Figs. S2 and S3). The most abundant sequence (OTU representative) from each sequence cluster (OTU) matched the sequenced clones from all four species of Trichonympha and all three species of Trichomitopsis in Z. angusticollis and Z. nevadensis, and no additional distinct sequence types were found. Also consistent with the single cell data, we found no OTUs matching T. campanula in Z. angusticollis collected from Monterey, nor did we find any OTUs matching T. termopsidis in Z. nevadensis nuttingi. In addition, we recovered OTUs matching clones of Trichonympha sp. 1 and 2 as well as Trichomitopsis sp. 1 from Z. laticeps. In addition to the OTUs from Trichonympha and Trichomitopsis, which all matched isolated cell clones, our amplicon sequencing data revealed two additional parabasalid OTUs. One of the OTU representatives branches with Simplicimonas (Tritrichomonadida) and the other branches with Cthulhu, Cthylla, Hexamastix, and related unidentified termite symbionts (Honigbergiellida). Although we did not attempt to isolate the very small single cells of Tricercomitus or Hexamastix, it is reasonable to conclude that the Honigbergiellida-related sequence belongs to the Hexamastix morphotype, and that the Simplicimonas-related sequence belongs to the Tricercomitus morphotype (pictured in Fig. 6). Z. angusticollis and both subspecies of Z. nevadensis all contained Hexamastix termopsidis, as well as a species designated here as Tricercomitus termopsidis var. 1, while Z. angusticollis and Z. nevadensis nevadensis also contained a distinct sequence type designated as Tricercomitus termopsidis var. 3. Z. laticeps contained Hexamastix laticeps and its own distinct sequence type of Tricercomitus, here designated as Tricercomitus termopsidis var. 2 (Fig. 6). Fig. 6. View largeDownload slide Phylogenetic positions of additional parabasalid OTU representatives from Zootermopsis species. (a) ML phylogram of Honigbergiellida-related SSU rRNA gene amplicon sequences, likely derived from Hexamastix termopsidis and Hexamastix laticeps. Only one OTU representative for each parabasalid species was included per host taxon/population. Values at nodes represent ML bootstrap values. (b) ML phylogram of Simplicimonas-related SSU rRNA gene amplicon sequences, likely derived from Tricercomitus spp., generated and labeled the same as (a). (c–e) Differential interference contrast images of Hexamastix termopsidis cells from Z. nevadensis nevadensis. (f–g) Differential interference contrast images of Tricercomitus termopsidis cells from Z. nevadensis nevadensis. Fig. 6. View largeDownload slide Phylogenetic positions of additional parabasalid OTU representatives from Zootermopsis species. (a) ML phylogram of Honigbergiellida-related SSU rRNA gene amplicon sequences, likely derived from Hexamastix termopsidis and Hexamastix laticeps. Only one OTU representative for each parabasalid species was included per host taxon/population. Values at nodes represent ML bootstrap values. (b) ML phylogram of Simplicimonas-related SSU rRNA gene amplicon sequences, likely derived from Tricercomitus spp., generated and labeled the same as (a). (c–e) Differential interference contrast images of Hexamastix termopsidis cells from Z. nevadensis nevadensis. (f–g) Differential interference contrast images of Tricercomitus termopsidis cells from Z. nevadensis nevadensis. Discussion There was partial support for the hypothesis that divergence in Zootermopsis termites resulted in subsequent divergence of their gut symbionts, as Z. laticeps contained parabasalid species that were genetically distinct from (although closely related to) the protists present in the west coast taxa. The divergence between Z. laticeps and the west coast taxa (most likely as a result of vicariance) is considered to be the most ancient divergence event within the genus (Thorne et al. 1993). This hypothesis was supported by the basal placement of Z. laticeps in our termite COI and COII phylogenetic tree. However, there was no evidence of divergence among the parabasalids found in the west coast taxa, as all hosts contained the same parabasalid species in nearly identical communities (except that Z. angusticollis from Monterey was missing T. campanula and Z. nevadensis nevadensis was missing T. termopsidis). For this reason, we are describing the observed pattern as incomplete co-cladogenesis. The lack of divergence among the parabasalids associated with the west coast taxa was surprising, as there is clear genetic differentiation between Z. angusticollis and Z. nevadensis, as well as between Z. nevadensis nevadensis and Z. nevadensis nuttingi. Broughton and Kistner (1991) estimated that Z. laticeps diverged from the west coast taxa 13 million years ago (mya), Z. angusticollis diverged from Z. nevadensis 9 mya, and the two Z. nevadensis subspecies diverged 2 mya. These estimates should be taken with caution as they were based on a strict molecular clock generated from DNA hybridization experiments, and the clock was not calibrated based on geological events or fossil records. However, even if the estimates are incorrect, it is likely that the divergence events occurred several million years ago, considering that the genus Zootermopsis is likely quite ancient (the common ancestor of Zootermopsis and the closely related genus Microhodotermes [Sjöstedt; Isoptera: Hodotermitidae] is estimated to have diverged ~90 mya, CI ~70 to 110 mya; Bourguignon et al. 2015). In addition, the species and subspecies are believed to have diverged in part because of the formation of geological barriers and changes in the distributions of their host species due to repeated glaciation events (Thorne et al. 1993), suggesting that sufficient time should have passed for the associated parabasalids to have diverged. Horizontal transmission among the west coast taxa might explain their identical symbiont species. The ranges of Z. angusticollis and Z. nevadensis nuttingi almost entirely overlap (Thorne et al. 1993), and the two species have been observed co-occurring within the same log (J. R. Liebig, unpublished data). Symbiont transmission might occur if workers or soldiers from the two species eat each other during antagonistic interactions (Haverty and Thorne 1989, Thorne 1990). Hybridization might also allow symbiont transmission although it has not been demonstrated that Z. angusticollis and Z. nevadensis nuttingi can form hybrids. Similarly, the northern and southern edges of the Z. nevadensis nevadensis range overlap with the ranges of Z. angusticollis and Z. nevadensis nuttingi, and in this case it has been demonstrated that the subspecies can hybridize (although the gene flow is primarily from Z. nevadensis nuttingi to Z. nevadensis nevadensis; Aldrich and Kambhampati 2009). The tendency of Zootermopsis termites to outcross via colony fusion (Aldrich and Kambhampati 2007, Howard et al. 2013) could also help to maintain homogeneity of hindgut communities across species and subspecies, in a manner analogous to gene flow. However, it is unclear whether any of these processes could be efficient enough to maintain identical species composition across the hosts’ continent-scale ranges, especially because there tends to be little gene flow between Zootermopsis populations (Booth et al. 2012). In addition, the slightly different symbiont communities maintained by sympatric populations of Z. nevadensis nuttingi and Z. angusticollis in Monterey (i.e., T. campanula was absent in Z. angusticollis, while T. termopsidis was absent in Z. nevadensis nuttingi) provides evidence against frequent horizontal transfer of symbionts. A more plausible explanation is that there has been insufficient time for the parabasalids to speciate since the divergence of their host species. It has been widely assumed that parabasalids associated with termites evolve rapidly, in large part because of the high intraspecific and even intragenomic diversity of rRNA sequences (Saldarriaga et al. 2011, Tai et al. 2013). Rapid evolution has been linked to rapid diversification and speciation in plants (e.g., Barraclough and Savolainen 2001) and animals (e.g., Lanfear et al. 2010), and we expected a similar pattern for the protists. However, very little is known about genome evolution in parabasalids, and it may be that a large amount of standing sequence diversity in a population of parabasalids or within an individual cell does not correlate with rapid evolution. Furthermore, morphological evolution in parabasalids is known to be quite slow. For example, the genus Trichonympha is older than termites themselves, as it is present in Cryptocercus and most lower termite families (Kirby 1930, Yamin 1979). Additional support for the slower evolution view is that the phylogenetic branch lengths separating the Z. laticeps symbionts from those in the other Zootermopsis species were not very long, indicating little sequence divergence relative to the divergence between Trichonympha from Zootermopsis and Reticulitermes (Fig. 3), or between Trichomitopsis and its sister genus Pseudotrypanosoma (Fig. 4). Considered from this perspective, the evolutionary divergence of the four Zootermopsis Trichonympha species would have occurred in the stem lineage of extant Zootermopsis, over the tens of millions of years since it diverged from Hodotermopsis. Note that the Trichonympha species associated with Reticulitermes are most likely descended from Trichonympha species associated with Hodotermopsis, via lateral symbiont transfer; Hodotermopsis is a close relative of Zootermopsis (Kitade 2004, Bourguignon et al. 2015). Losses of T. collaris and T. sphaerica would therefore have occurred in the ancestor of Z. laticeps (Fig. 3), just as we observed losses of T. campanula and T. termopsidis in the Monterrey populations of Z. angusticollis and Z. nevadensis nuttingi, respectively. It should also be noted in this context that mitochondrial COI and COII genes (as used for the Zootermopsis phylogenetic analysis) typically evolve much faster than nuclear SSU genes (as used for parabasalid phylogenies). Perhaps a faster-evolving gene in the parabasalids would reveal some sequence divergence to mirror that of the hosts. The SSU rRNA gene in parabasalids evolves rapidly enough that molecular phylogenies have successfully delimited all recently described parabasalids from distinct host species (e.g., Harper et al. 2009; Gile et al. 2011, 2013) so its lack of divergence here is nevertheless surprising. Despite the paradigm of co-cladogenesis between termites and their gut symbionts (Lo and Eggleton 2011, Cruaud and Rasplus 2016), there have been surprisingly few demonstrations of clear co-cladogenesis between lower termites and associated protists. The only published example of congruent termite and protist phylogenies was for select termite species in the family Rhinotermitidae and their Pseudotrichonympha symbionts (Noda et al. 2007). However, in that study the Pseudotrichonympha species were isolated from termite species that were distantly related. For example, although the termite species Coptotermes testaceus (Linnaeus; Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) and Coptotermes formosanus (Shiraki; Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) are members of the same genus, the species are separated by a divergence event that occurred ~22 mya, CI ~18 to 25 mya (Bourguignon et al. 2016), and no Pseudotrichonympha from any termite species that diverged between C. testaceus and C. formosanus were included in the analyses. It is therefore unclear whether the entire Rhinotermitidae phylogeny is congruent with the phylogeny of associated Pseudotrichonympha, or whether the co-cladogenesis observed by Noda et al. (2007) can only be observed with sufficiently long divergence times between termite species. Indeed, until the current study, no surveys had been conducted on parabasalid associates within an entire termite genus to test for coevolutionary patterns at the species level. Additional surveys across other lower termite genera are required to test whether our findings are typical for lower termite-parabasalid associations, or if Zootermopsis is an exception. An interesting finding from this study was that some of the Zootermopsis species and populations appeared to have lost parabasalid species (T. campanula from Z. angusticollis in Monterey, and T. termopsidis in Z. nevadensis nuttingi). As the missing symbionts were consistent within colonies (and in the case of Z. nevadensis nuttingi, across geographically close colonies), it is likely that the termite reproductives that founded the colonies or populations lacked the symbionts. This is the first report of absent parabasalids species in Zootermopsis termites. However, the absence of certain protist species from termite individuals, colonies and populations has been reported in various lower termite species in Asia (Kitade and Matsumoto 1993, Kitade et al. 2012, 2013). In these studies, the authors thoroughly examined the protist community assemblages of different termite colonies of Reticulitermes species (Kitade and Matsumoto 1993), Hodotermopsis sjoestedti (Holmgren; Isoptera: Termopsidae) (Kitade et al. 2012) and Coptotermes formosanus (Kitade et al. 2013) across the termite species’ ranges. With each host, the authors observed instances where one or two protist species were absent, either from individuals within a colony, or from the entire colony. However, protist species that were reported as missing may have simply been overlooked, as the identifications in each study were based solely on morphology. Our study confirms the absence of protist species using molecular identification, including high-throughput sequencing of entire hindguts. Supplementary Material Supplementary data are available at Environmental Entomology online. Acknowledgments We would like to thank Mikaela Garcia, Daniel Jasso-Selles, Trevor Merrell, and Katalina Freeman for assistance with cell isolations and molecular work. In addition, we would like to thank Kevin Haight for maintaining the termite colonies at Arizona State University and helping with termite collection. We would also like to thank Barbara Thorne, Michael Haverty, and Bill Donahue for termite collection advice. Finally, we are grateful to Sandy Anderson for allowing us to collect Z. laticeps on the Gray Hawk Nature Center and the administrators of the Pebble Beach Company for permission to collect termites in their forest. This work was supported by the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences and the School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University (startup grant to GHG) and by the National Science Foundation (Award #1644328). References Cited Aanen, D. K., Ros V. I. D., de Fine Licht H. H., Michell J., de Beer Z. W., Slippers B., Rouland-LeFèvre C., and Boomsma J. J.. 2007. Patterns of interaction specificity of fungus-growing termites and Termitomyces symbionts in South Africa. BMC Evol. Biol . 7: 115. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Aldrich, B. T., and Kambhampati S.. 2007. Population structure and colony composition of two Zootermopsis nevadensis subspecies. Heredity (Edinb) 99: 443– 451. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Aldrich, B. T., and Kambhampati S.. 2009. Preliminary analysis of a hybrid zone between two subspecies of Zootermopsis nevadensis. Insectes Soc . 56: 439– 450. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Arnold, A. E., Lamit L. J., Gehring C. A., Bidartondo M. I., and Callahan H.. 2010. Interwoven branches of the plant and fungal trees of life. New Phytol . 4: 874– 878. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Barraclough, T. G., and Savolainen V.. 2001. Evolutionary rates and species diversity in flowering plants. Evolution . 55: 677– 683. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Booth, W., Brent C. S., Calleri D. V., Rosengaus R. B., Traniello J. F. A., and Vargo E. L.. 2012. Population genetic structure and colony breeding system in dampwood termites (Zootermopsis angusticollis and Z. nevadensis nuttingi). Insectes Soc . 59: 127– 137. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Bourguignon, T., Lo N., Cameron S. L., Šobotník J., Hayashi Y., Shigenobu S., Watanabe D., Roisin Y., Miura T., and Evans T. A.. 2015. The evolutionary history of termites as inferred from 66 mitochondrial genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol . 32: 406– 421. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Bourguignon, T., Lo N., Šobotník J., Sillam-Dussès D., Roisin Y., and Evans T. A.. 2016. Oceanic dispersal, vicariance and human introduction shaped the modern distribution of the termites Reticulitermes, Heterotermes and Coptotermes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci . 283: 20160179. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Bright, M., and Bulgheresi S.. 2010. A complex journey: transmission of microbial symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol . 8: 218– 230. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Broughton, R. E., and Kistner D. H.. 1991. A DNA hybridization study of the termite genus Zootermopsis (Isoptera: Termopsidae). Sociobiology 19: 15– 40. Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski J., Stombaugh J., Bittinger K., Bushman F. D., Costello E. K., Fierer N., Pena A. G., Goodrich J. K., Gordon J. I.,et al. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7: 335– 336. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Čepička, I., Hampl V., and Kulda J.. 2010. Critical taxonomic revision of parabasalids with description of one new genus and three new species. Protist 161: 400– 433. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Čepička, I., Dolan M. S., and Gile G. H.. 2017. Parabasalia, pp. 1– 44. In Archibald J. M., Simpson A. G. B., and Slamovits C. H. (eds.), Handbook of Protists . Springer, New York, NY. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32669-6_9-1. Clay, K., and Schardl C.. 2002. Evolutionary origins and ecological consequences of endophyte symbiosis with grasses. Am. Nat . 160: S99– S127. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Cruaud, A., and Rasplus J.-Y.. 2016. Testing cospeciation through large-scale cophylogenetic studies. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci . 18: 53– 59. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Deane, J., Hill D., Brett S., and McFadden G.. 1998. Hanusia phi gen. et sp. nov. (Cryptophyceae): characterization of ‘Cryptomonas sp. Φ.’ Eur. J. Phycol . 33: 149– 154. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS de Vienne, D. M., Refrégier G., López-Villavicencio M., Tellier A., Hood M. E., Giraud T.. 2013. Cospeciation vs host-shift speciation: methods for testing, evidence from natural associations and relation to coevolution. New Phytol . 198: 347– 385. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Gile, G. H., James E. R., Scheffrahn R. H., Carpenter K. J., Harper J. T., and Keeling P. J.. 2011. Molecular and morphological analysis of the family Calonymphidae with a description of Calonympha chia sp. nov., Snyderella kirbyi sp. nov., Snyderella swezyae sp. nov. and Snyderella yamini sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol . 61: 2547– 2558. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Gile, G. H., Carpenter K. J., James E. R., Scheffrahn R. H., and Keeling P. J.. 2013. Morphology and molecular phylogeny of Staurojoenina mulleri sp. nov. (Trichonymphida, Parabasalia) from the hindgut of the Kalotermitid Neotermes jouteli. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol . 60: 203– 213. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Gruber-Vodicka, H. R., Dirks U., Leisch N., Baranyi C., Stoecker K., Bulgheresi S., Heindl N. R., Horn M., Lott C., Loy A.,et al. 2011. Paracatenula, an ancient symbiosis between thiotrophic Alphaproteobacteria and catenulid flatworms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 108: 12078– 12083. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Hampl, V., Čepička I., Flegr J., Tachezy J., and Kulda J.. 2004. Hexamastix mitis strain Cycl isolate 16 16S-like ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence; internal transcribed spacer 1, 5.8S-like ribosomal RNA gene, and internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence and 28S-like ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol . 32: 711– 723. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Harper, J. T., Gile G. H., James E. R., Carpenter K. J., and Keeling P. J.. 2009. The inadequacy of morphology for species and genus delineation of microbial eukaryotes: an example from the parabasalian termite symbiont Coronympha. PLoS One 4: e6577. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Haverty, M. I., and Thorne B. L.. 1989. Agonistic behavior correlated with hydrocarbon phenotypes in dampwood termites, Zootermopsis (Isoptera: Termopsidae). J. Insect Behav . 2: 523– 543. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Haverty, M. I., Page M., Nelson L. J., and Blomquist G. J.. 1988. Cuticular hydrocarbons of dampwood termites, Zootermopsis: intra- and intercolony variation and potential as taxonomic characters. J. Chem. Ecol . 14: 1035– 1058. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Hebert, P. D. N., Penton E. H., Burns J. M., Janzen D. H., and Hallwachs W.. 2004. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 101: 14812– 14817. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Howard, K. J., Johns P. M., Breisch N. L., and Thorne B. L.. 2013. Frequent colony fusions provide opportunities for helpers to become reproductive in the termite Zootermopsis nevadensis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol . 67: 1575– 1585. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Ikeda-Ohtsubo, W., and Brune A.. 2009. Cospeciation of termite gut flagellates and their bacterial endosymbionts: Trichonympha species and ‘Candidatus Endomicrobium trichonymphae.’ Mol. Ecol . 18: 332– 342. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Ikeda-Ohtsubo, W., Desai M., Stingl U., and Brune A.. 2007. Phylogenetic diversity of ‘Endomicrobia’ and their specific affiliation with termite gut flagellates. Microbiology 153: 3458– 3465. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed James, E. R., Okamoto N., Burki F., Scheffrahn R. H., and Keeling P. J.. 2013a. Cthulhu macrofasciculumque n. g., n. sp. and Cthylla microfasciculumque n. g., n. sp., a newly identified lineage of parabasalian termite symbionts. PLoS One 8: e58509. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS James, E. R., Tai V., Scheffrahn R. H., and Keeling P. J.. 2013b. Trichonympha burlesquei n. sp. from Retiuculiterms virginicus and evidence against a cosmopolitan distribution of Trichonympha agilis in many termite hosts. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol . 63: 3873– 3876. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Jasso-Selles, D. E., De Martini F., Freeman K. D., Garcia M. D., Merrell T. L., Scheffrahn R. H., and Gile G. H.. 2017. The parabasalid symbiont community of Heterotermes aureus: molecular and morphological characterization of four new species and reestablishment of the genus Cononympha. Eur. J. Protistol . 61: 48– 63. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Katoh, K., and Standley D. M.. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol . 30: 772– 780. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Keeling, P. J. 2002. Molecular phylogenetic position of Tirchomitipsis termopsidis (Parabasalia) and evidence for the Trichomitopsiinae. Eur. J. Protistol . 38: 279– 286. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Keeling, P. J., Poulsen N., and McFadden G. I.. 1998. Phylogenetic diversity of parabasalian symbionts from termites, including the phylogenetic position of Pseudotrypanosoma and Trichonympha. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol . 45: 643– 650. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Kikuchi, Y., Hosokawa T., Nikoh N., Meng X. Y., Kamagata Y., and Fukatsu T.. 2009. Host-symbiont co-speciation and reductive genome evolution in gut symbiotic bacteria of acanthosomatid stinkbugs. BMC Biol . 7: 2. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Kirby, H. 1930. Trichomonad flagellates from termites I. Tricercomitus gen. nov. and Hexamastix Alexeieff. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool . 33: 393– 444. Kirby, H. 1931. Trichomonad flagellates from termites II. Eutrichomastix and the subfamily Trichomonadinae. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool . 36: 171– 262. Kirby, H. 1932. Flagellates of the genus Trichonympha in termites. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool . 37: 349– 476. Kirby, H. 1934. Protozoa in termites, pp. 84– 93. In Kofoid C.A. (ed.), Termites and termite control . University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. Kirby, H. 1937. Host-parasite relations in the distribution of parasites in termites. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool . 37: 349– 476. Kitade, O. 2004. Comparison of symbiotic flagellate faunae between termites and a wood-feeding cockroach of the genus Cryptocercus. Microbes Environ . 19: 215– 220. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Kitade, O., and Matsumoto T.. 1993. Symbiotic protistan faunae of Reticulitermes (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in the Japan archipelago. Sociobiology 23: 135– 153. Kitade, O., and Matsumoto T.. 1998. Characteristics of the symbiotic flagellate composition within the termite family Rhinotermitidae (Isoptera). Symbiosis 25: 271– 278. Kitade, O., Hayashi Y., Takatsuto K., and Matsumoto T.. 2012. Variation and diversity of symbiotic protist composition in the damp-wood termite Hodotermopsis sjoestedti. Jpn. J. Protozool . 45: 29– 36. Kitade, O., Hayashi Y., and Noda S.. 2013. Symbiotic protist communities in the termite Coptotermes formosanus in Japan and a comparison of community structures between workers and soldiers. Jpn. J. Protozool . 46: 21– 29. Kleinschmidt, B., and Kölsch G.. 2011. Adopting bacteria in order to adapt to water – how reed beetles colonized the wetlands (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Donaciinae). Insects 2: 540– 554. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Kofoid, C.A., and Swezy O.. 1919. Studies on the parasites of the termites II. On Trichomitus termitidis, a polymastigote flagellate with a highly developed neuromotor system. Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool . 20: 21– 40. Kumar, S., Stecher G., and Tamura K.. 2015. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol . 33: 1870– 1874. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Lanfear, R., Ho S. Y. W., Love D., and Bromham L.. 2010. Mutation rate is linked to diversification in birds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 107: 20423– 20428. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Legendre, F., Whiting M. F., Bordereau C., Cancello E. M., Evans T. A., and Grandcolas P.. 2008. The phylogeny of termites (Dictyoptera: Isoptera) based on mitochondrial and nuclear markers: implications for the evolution of the worker and pseudergate castes, and foraging behaviors. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol . 48: 615– 627. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Lo, N., and Eggleton P.. 2011. Termite phylogenetics and co-cladogenesis with symbionts, pp. 27– 50. In Bignell D. E., Roisin Y., and Lo N. (eds.), Biology of termites: a modern synthesis . Springer, Dordrecht, Germany. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Lo, N., Bandi C., Watanabe H., Nalepa C., and Beninati T.. 2003. Evidence for cocladogenesis between diverse dictyopteran lineages and their intracellular endosymbionts. Mol. Biol. Evol . 20: 907– 913. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Mahé, F., Rognes T., Quince C., Vargas C., and Dunthorn M.. 2015. Swarm v2: highly-scalable and high-resolution amplicon clustering. PeerJ 3: e1420. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Martin, M. 2011. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J . 17: 10– 12. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Masella, A. P., Bartram A. K., Truszkowski J. M., Brown D. G., and Neufeld J. D.. 2012. PANDAseq: PAired-eND Assembler for Illumina sequences. BMC Bioinformatics 13: 31. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Moran, N., and Baumann P.. 1994. Phylogenetics of cytoplasmically inherited microorganisms of arthropods. Trends Ecol. Evol . 9: 15– 20. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Nalepa, C. A., Bignell D. E., and Bandi C.. 2001. Detritivory, coprophagy, and the evolution of digestive mutualisms in Dictyoptera. Insectes Soc . 48: 194– 201. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Nieberding, C. M., and Olivieri I.. 2007. Parasites: proxies for host genealogy and ecology? Trends Ecol. Evol . 22: 156– 165. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Noda, S., Kitade O., Inoue T., Kawai M., Kanuka M., Hiroshima K., Hongoh Y., Constantino R., Uys V., Zhong J., et al. . 2007. Cospeciation in the triplex symbiosis of termite gut protists (Pseudotrichonympha spp.), their hosts, and their bacterial endosymbionts. Mol. Ecol . 16: 1257– 1266. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Ohkuma, M., and Brune A.. 2010. Diversity, structure, and evolution of the termite gut microbial community, pp. 413– 438. In Bignell D. E., Roisin Y., and Lo N. (eds.), Biology of termites: a modern synthesis . Springer, Dordrecht, Germany. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Ohkuma, M., Ohtoko K., Grunau C., Moriya S., and Kudo T.. 1998. Phylogenetic identification of the symbiotic hypermastigote Trichonympha agilis in the hindgut of the termite Reticulitermes speratus based on small-subunit rRNA sequence. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol . 45: 439– 444. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Ohkuma, M., Ohtoko K., Iida T., Tokura M., Moriya S., Usami R., Horikoshi K., and Kudo T.. 2000. Phylogenetic identification of hypermastigotes, Pseudotrichonympha, Spirotrichonympha, Holomastigotoides, and parabasalian symbionts in the hindgut of termites. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol . 47: 249– 259. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Ohkuma, M., Iida T., Ohtoko K., Yuzawa H., Noda S., Viscogliosi E., and Kudo T.. 2005. Molecular phylogeny of parabasalids inferred from small subunit rRNA sequences, with emphasis on the Hypermastigea. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol . 35: 646– 655. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Peterson, B. F., and Scharf M. E.. 2016. Lower termite associations with microbes: synergy, protection, and interplay. Front. Microbiol . 7: 422. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Radek, R., Meuser K., Strassert J. F. H., Arslan O., Teßmer A., Šobotník J., Sillam-Dussès D., Nink R. A., and Brune A.. 2017. Exclusive gut flagellates of Serritermitidae suggest a major transfaunation event in lower termites: description of Heliconympha glossotermitis gen. nov. spec. nov. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol . doi: 10.1111/jeu.12441. Rahman, N. A., Parks D. H., Wilner D. L., Engelbrektson A. L., Goffredi S. K., Warnecke F., Scheffrahn R. H., and Hugenholtz P. A.. 2015. A molecular survey of Australian and North American termite genera indicates that vertical inheritance is the primary force shaping termite gut microbiomes. Microbiome 3: 5. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Rambaut, A., Suchard M. A., Xie D., and Drummond A. J.. 2014. Tracer v. 1.6. [WWW document]. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer. Rognes, T., Flouri T., Nichols B., Quince C., and Mahé F.. 2016. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4: e2584. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Ronquist, F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D. L., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M. A., and Huelsenbeck J. P.. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol . 61: 539– 542. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Rosenberg, E., and Rosenberg I. Z.. 2016. Microbes drive evolution of animals and plants: the hologenome concept. mBio 7: e01395– 15. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Saldarriaga, J. F., Gile G. H., James E. R., Horák A., Scheffrahn R. H., Keeling P. J.. 2011. Morphology and molecular phylogeny of Pseudotrichonympha hertwigi and Pseudotrichonympha paulistana (Trichonymphea, Parabasalia) from neotropical Rhinotermitids. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol . 58: 487– 496. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Smejkalová, P., Votýpka J., Lukeš J., and Čepička I.. 2014. First report on trichomonads from true bugs. Folia Parasitol . 61: 189– 194. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Stamatakis, A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30: 1312– 1313. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Stingl, U., and Brune A.. 2003. Phylogenetic diversity and whole-cell hybridization of oxymonad flagellates from the hindgut of the wood-feeding lower termite Reticulitermes flavipes. Protist 154: 147– 155. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Tai, V., James E. R., Perlman S. J., and Keeling P. J.. 2013. Single single-cell DNA barcoding using sequences from the small subunit rRNA and internal transcribed spacer region identifies new species of Trichonympha and Trichomitopsis from the hindgut of the termite Zootermopsis angusticollis. PLoS One 8: e58728. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Tai, V., James E. R., Nalepa C. A., Scheffrahn R. H., Perlman S. J., and Keeling P. J.. 2015. The role of host phylogeny varies in shaping microbial diversity in the hindguts of lower termites. Appl. Environ. Microbiol . 81: 1059– 1070. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Thorne, B. L. 1990. A case for ancestral transfer of symbionts between cockroaches and termites. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci . 241: 37– 41. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Thorne, B. L., Haverty M. I., Page M., and Nutting W. L.. 1993. Distribution and biogeography of the North American Termite Genus Zootermopsis (Isoptera: Termopsidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am . 86: 532– 544. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Wang, Q., Garrity G. M., Tiedje J. M., and Cole J. R.. 2007. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol . 73: 5261– 5267. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Wirth, T., Guellec R. L., and Veuille M.. 1999. Directional substitution and evolution of nucleotide content in the cytochrome oxidase II gene in earwigs (Dermapteran Insects). Mol. Biol. Evol . 16: 1645– 1653. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Yamin, M. A. 1979. Flagellates of the orders Trichomonadida Kirby, Oxymonadida Grassé, and Hypermastigida Grassi and Foà reported from lower termites (Isoptera families Mastotermitidae, Kalotermitidae, Hodotermitidae, Termopsidae, Rhinotermitidae, and Serritermitidae) and from the wood-feeding roach Cryptocercus (Dictyoptera, Cryptocercidae). Sociobiology 4: 3– 119. Zheng, W. W., Nilsson M., Bergman B., and Rasmussen U.. 1999. Genetic diversity and classification of cyanobacteria in different Azolla species by the use of PCR fingerprinting. Theor. Appl. Genet . 99: 1187– 1193. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Zheng, H., Dietrich C., Thompson C. L., Meuser K., and Brune A.. 2015. Population structure of Endomicrobia in single host cells of termite gut flagellate (Trichonympha spp.). Microbes Environ . 30: 92– 98. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Environmental Entomology – Oxford University Press
Published: Feb 1, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.
Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.
It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera