Add Journal to My Library
International Mathematics Research Notices
, Volume 2018 (3) – Feb 1, 2018

11 pages

/lp/ou_press/four-dimensional-gradient-shrinking-solitons-with-positive-isotropic-mejC8pYkYk

- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Copyright
- © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.
- ISSN
- 1073-7928
- eISSN
- 1687-0247
- D.O.I.
- 10.1093/imrn/rnw269
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract We show that a four-dimensional complete gradient shrinking Ricci soliton with positive isotropic curvature is either a quotient of $$\mathbb{S}^4$$ or a quotient of $$\mathbb{S}^3 \times \mathbb R $$. This gives a clean classification result removing the earlier additional assumptions in [14] by Wallach and the second author. The proof also gives a classification result on gradient shrinking Ricci solitons with non-negative isotropic curvature. 1 Introduction A gradient shrinking Ricci soliton is a triple $$(M,g,f)$$, a complete Riemannian manifold with a smooth potential function $$f$$ whose Hessian satisfying Ric+∇∇f=12g. (1.1) Gradient shrinking solitons arise naturally in the study of the singularity analysis of the Ricci flow [4, 15]. It also attracts the study since (1.1) generalizes the notion of Einstein metrics. The main purpose of this article concerns a classification of such four-manifolds with positive isotropic curvature. The positive isotropic curvature condition was first introduced by Micalleff and Moore [7] in applying the index computation of harmonic spheres to the study of the topology of manifolds. The Ricci flow on four-manifolds with positive isotropic curvature was studied by Hamilton [5]. This condition was proven to be invariant under Ricci flow in dimension four by Hamilton and in high dimensions by Brendle and Schoen [1] and Nguyen [12]. It is hence then interesting to understand the solitons under the positive isotropic curvature condition. In [14], Wallach and the second author classified the four-dimensional gradient shrinking solitons with positive isotropic curvature under some extra assumptions, including the nonnegative curvature operator, a pinching condition and a curvature growth condition. Since then, there have been much progresses in understanding the general shrinking solitons [3, 6, 8, 10, 11] and particularly the four-dimensional ones [9]. In particular, a classification result was obtained in [10] for solitons with nonnegative curvature operator for all dimensions. The purpose of this article is to prove the following classification result on shrinking solitons with positive isotropic curvature by removing all the additional assumptions in [14]. Theorem 1.1. Any four-dimensional complete gradient shrinking Ricci soliton with positive isotropic curvature is either a quotient of $$\mathbb{S}^4$$ or a quotient of $$\mathbb{S}^3 \times \mathbb R $$. □ It remains an interesting question whether or not the same result holds in high dimensions. We plan to return to this in the future. 2 Preliminaries In this section, we collect some results on gradient shrinking Ricci solitons that will be used in this article. After normalizing the potential function $$f$$ via translating, we have the following identities [4]: Lemma 2.1. S+Δf=n2,S+|∇f|2=f, where $$S$$ denotes the scalar curvature of $$M$$. □ Regarding the growth of the potential function $$f$$ and the volume of geodesic balls, Cao and Zhou [3] showed that Lemma 2.2. Let $$(M^n, g)$$ be a complete gradient shrinking Ricci soliton of dimension $$n$$ and $$p \in M$$. Then there are positive constants $$c_1, c_2$$ and $$C$$ such that 14(d(x,p)−c1)+2≤f(x)≤14(d(x,p)+c2)2,Vol(Bp(r))≤Crn. □ Munteanu and Sesum [8] proved the following integral bound for the Ricci curvature. Lemma 2.3. Let $$(M, g)$$ be a complete gradient shrinking Ricci soliton. Then for any $$\lambda >0$$, we have ∫M|Ric|2e−λf<∞. □ The above mentioned results are valid in all dimensions. In the following, we recall some special properties in four dimensions. It is well known that, in dimension four, the curvature operator $$R$$ can be written as R=(ABBtC) according to the natural splitting $$\wedge^2(\mathbb R^4) =\wedge_{+} \oplus \wedge_{-}$$, where $$\wedge_{+}$$ and $$\wedge_{-}$$ are the self-dual and anti-self-dual parts respectively. It is easy to see that $$A$$ and $$C$$ are symmetric. Denote $$A_1\leq A_2 \leq A_3$$ and $$C_1\leq C_2 \leq C_3$$ the eigenvalues of $$A$$ and $$C$$, respectively. Also let $$0\leq B_1 \leq B_2 \leq B_3$$ be the singular eigenvalues of $$B$$. A direct consequence of the first Bianchi identity is that $$\operatorname{tr}(A) =\operatorname{tr}(C) =\frac{S}{4}$$, where $$S$$ is the scalar curvature. Moreover, $$M$$ has positive isotropic curvature amounts to $$A_1 +A_2 >0$$ and $$C_1+C_2 >0$$. In [14], Wallach and the second author computed that $$\overset{\circ}{\text{Ric}}$$ can be expressed in terms of components of $$B$$, where $$\overset{\circ}{\text{Ric}}$$ is the traceless part of the Ricci tensor. In particular, $$4\|B\|^2 =|\overset{\circ}{\text{Ric}}|^2$$ and $$\sum_{1}^{4} \lambda_i^3 =24 \det B$$, where $$\lambda_i$$’s are the eigenvalues of $$\overset{\circ}{\text{Ric}}$$. It was also observed in [14, Proposition 3.1] that these components of the curvature operator satisfy certain differential inequalities, which play a significant role in the classification results. Proposition 2.1. If $$(M, g(t))$$ is a solution to the Ricci flow, then we have the following differential inequalities (∂∂t−Δ)(A1+A2)≥A12+A22+2(A1+A2)A3+B12+B22,(∂∂t−Δ)(C1+C2)≥C12+C22+2(C1+C2)C3+B12+B22,(∂∂t−Δ)B3≤A3B3+C3B3+2B1B2 in the distributional sense. □ We now summarize the ideas used to prove the classification result in [14] and explain our strategy of removing all the assumptions except positive isotropic curvature. First of all, it was shown in [13, Proposition 4.2] that if $$S\neq 0$$, then (∂∂t−Δ)(|Rijkl|2S2)=4PS3−2S4|S∇pRijkl−∇pSRijkl|2+⟨∇(|Rijkl|2S2),∇logS2⟩, where $$P$$ is defined by P=4S⟨R2+R♯,R⟩−|Ric|2|Rijkl|2. Here $$\#$$ is the operator defined using the Lie algebra structure of $$\wedge^2 T_pM$$ (see e.g., [4]). Under a certain curvature growth assumption, the classification result follows from the proof of the main theorem in [13] if one can show that $$P \leq 0 $$. In dimension 4, $$P$$ can be expressed in terms of $$A, B,$$ and $$C$$. Let $$\overset{\circ}{A}$$ and $$\overset{\circ}{C}$$ be the traceless parts of $$A$$ and $$C$$, respectively. By choosing suitable basis of $$\wedge_{+}$$ and $$\wedge_{-}$$, we may diagonalize $$\overset{\circ}{A}$$ and $$\overset{\circ}{C}$$ such that A=(S12+a1000S12+a2000S12+a3), C=(S12+c1000S12+c2000S12+c3). Then $$P$$ can be written as (see [14]) P=−S2(16∑14λi2+∑13ai2+∑13ci2)+4S(∑13(ai3+ci3)+6a1a2a3+6c1c2c3−12∑14λi3)+12S(a1b12+a2b22+a3b32+c1b~12+c2b~22+c3b~32)−2(∑14λi2)2−4(∑14λi2)(∑13(ai2+ci2)), where $$\sum_{1}^{3}a_i =\sum_{1}^{3}c_i =\sum_{1}^{4}\lambda_i =0$$, $$b_i^2 =\sum_{j=1}^{3}B_{ij}^2$$ and $$\tilde{b}_i^2 =\sum_{j=1}^{3}B_{ji}^2$$. A key observation in [14] is that for several basic examples, one always has $$BB^t =b^2 \operatorname{id} $$ for some constant $$b$$ and $$P=0$$. By considering the evolution equation of the quantity $$\frac{B_3^4}{(A_1+A_2)^2(C_1+C_2)^2}$$ and applying integration by parts, Wallach and the second author proved that $$BB^t =b^2 \operatorname{id} $$ is indeed valid for all four-dimensional shrinking Ricci solitons satisfying two very weak curvature assumptions: B32(A1+A2)(C1+C2)(x)≤exp(a(r(x)+1)), (2.1) |Rijkl|(x)≤exp(a(r(x)+1)) (2.2) for some $$a>0$$, where $$r(x)$$ is the distance function to a fixed point on the manifold. These two assumptions are only needed to ensure that all the integrals involved in the integration by parts argument are finite. To remove these two curvature assumptions, we show that $$BB^t =b^2 \operatorname{id} $$ in fact holds for all four-dimensional shrinking Ricci solitons with positive isotropic curvature. Our strategy is to consider the evolution equation of $$\frac{B_3}{\sqrt{(A_1+A_2)(C_1+C_2)}}$$ and sharpen the integration by parts argument in [14]. In the proof, in order to guarantee that all the integrals involved are finite, we use the integral bound of the Ricci curvature in Lemma 2.3. Now when $$BB^t =b^2 \operatorname{id}$$, $$P$$ has a much simpler expression: P=−S2(∑13ai2+∑13ci2)+12S(∑13(ai3+ci3))−2b2(S+12b)2−48b2(∑13ai2+∑13ci2)≤−S(S∑13ai2−12∑13ai3)−S(S∑13ci2−12∑13ci3), where we have used the following 3b2=∑13bi2=∑13b~i2=14∑14λi2,∑13ai3+6a1a2a3=3∑13ai3,∑14λi3=24detB=24b3. Then by further assuming that $$M$$ has non-negative curvature operator, namely, $$A$$ and $$C$$ are positive semidefinite, $$P\leq 0$$ was proved in [14] by solving two optimization problems with constraints. More precisely, they showed that under the constraints $$\sum_{1}^{3}a_i = 0$$ and $$\frac{S}{12} +a_i \geq 0$$, the maximum of $$\sum_{1}^{3} a_i^2$$ is $$\frac{S^2}{24}$$, while under further normalization $$\sum_{1}^{3}a_i^2 =1$$ it holds that ∑13ai3∑13ai2≤16(∑13ai2)12. Combining these results, one easily obtains S∑13ai2−12∑13ai3≥0. The terms with $$c_i$$’ s can be handled similarly and thus they arrived at that $$P\leq 0$$. By solving another optimization problem under weaker constraints, we achieve in this paper that $$P\leq 0$$ without assuming $$M$$ has non-negative curvature operator. In the last step we also sharpen the integration by parts argument in [13] instead of appealing the result in [13] as in [14] since we no longer assume a curvature growth condition (2.2). These three improvements allow us to prove the main result without any additional assumptions. 3 Proof of Theorem 1.1 For brevity, we introduce the same notations as in [14]: $$\psi_1=A_1+A_2$$, $$\psi_2=C_1+C_2$$, $$\varphi=B_3$$ and −E=−4B1(B3−B2)B3−(A1−B1)2+(A2−B2)2+2A2(B2−B1)A1+A2−(C1−B1)2+(C2−B2)2+2C2(B2−B1)C1+C2. It is clear that $$-E \leq 0$$ with equality holds only if $$A_1 =C_1 =B_1 =B_2 =A_2 =C_2 =B_3$$. In particular we have $$BB^t =b^2 \operatorname{id}$$ for some $$b$$. Also notice that $$M$$ has positive isotropic curvature amounts to $$\psi_1 >0$$ and $$\psi_2 >0$$. Proposition 3.1. The following differential inequality holds in the sense of distribution: (∂∂t−Δ)φψ1ψ2≤−12φψ1ψ2E−14φ|ψ1∇ψ2−ψ2∇ψ1|2(ψ1ψ2)52+⟨∇(φψ1ψ2),∇log(ψ1ψ2)⟩. (3.1) □ Proof. Straightforward calculations yield (∂∂t−Δ)φψ1ψ2=(∂∂t−Δ)φψ1ψ2−12φψ1(∂∂t−Δ)ψ2+φψ2(∂∂t−Δ)ψ1(ψ1ψ2)32−14φ|ψ1∇ψ2−ψ2∇ψ1|2(ψ1ψ2)52+⟨∇(φψ1ψ2),∇log(ψ1ψ2)⟩. Substituting the differential inequalities in Proposition 2.1 into the above equation gives, after some cancelations, that (∂∂t−Δ)φψ1ψ2≤−12φψ1ψ2E−14φ|ψ1∇ψ2−ψ2∇ψ1|2(ψ1ψ2)52+⟨∇(φψ1ψ2),∇log(ψ1ψ2)⟩. This proves the proposition. ■ Proposition 3.2. Let $$(M, g, f)$$ be a four-dimensional gradient shrinking Ricci soliton with positive isotropic curvature. Then $$BB^t =b^2 \operatorname{id}$$. □ Proof. On a gradient Ricci soliton, it holds that ∂∂t(φψ1ψ2)=⟨∇f,∇(φψ1ψ2)⟩. Fix a point $$x_0$$ in $$M$$. For any $$r >0$$, one can choose a smooth cut-off function $$\eta$$ with support in $$\{x\in M : d(x, x_0)\leq r\}$$ and $$|\nabla \eta | \leq C/r$$. Then multiplying both sides of (3.1) by $$ \frac{\varphi}{\sqrt{\psi_1 \psi_2}} e^{-f +\log (\psi_1 \psi_2)} \eta^2 $$ and integrating over $$M$$, ∫M(⟨∇f,∇(φψ1ψ2)⟩−Δ(φψ1ψ2))φψ1ψ2e−f+log(ψ1ψ2)η2≤−12∫Mφ2Ee−fη2+∫M⟨∇(φψ1ψ2),∇log(ψ1ψ2)⟩φψ1ψ2e−f+log(ψ1ψ2)η2. After integration by parts and some cancelations, we arrive at 0≤−∫M|∇(φψ1ψ2)|2e−f+log(ψ1ψ2)η2−12∫Mφ2Ee−fη2−2∫M⟨∇(φψ1ψ2),∇η⟩φψ1ψ2e−f+log(ψ1ψ2)η≤∫Mφ2|∇η|2e−f−12∫Mφ2Ee−fη2≤C2r2∫Mφ2e−f−12∫Mφ2Ee−fη2. Since $$4 \varphi^2 = 4 B_3^2 \leq 4 \|B\|^2 = |\overset{\circ}{\text{Ric}}|^2=|\text{Ric}|^2-\frac{S^2}{4} $$, we obtain, in view of Lemmas 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3, ∫Mφ2e−f≤14∫M(|Ric|2−S24)e−f<∞. Letting $$r \to \infty$$ implies that $$\int_{M} \varphi^2 E e^{-f}=0$$. Therefore, we must have either $$B_3=0$$ or $$E=0$$. It then follows that $$BB^t =b^2 \operatorname{id}$$. ■ Proposition 3.3. Let $$(M, g, f) $$ be a four-dimensional gradient shrinking Ricci soliton with positive isotropic curvature. Then $$P\leq 0.$$ □ Proof. Recall from Section 2, since $$BB^t = b^2 \operatorname{id} $$, we have P≤−S(S∑13ai2−12∑13ai3)−S(S∑13ci2−12∑13ci3). In order to prove $$P\leq 0$$, it suffices to show that S∑13ai2−12∑13ai3≥0. With suitable choices of the orthonormal basis for $$\wedge_+$$, we can assume that $$A_i =\frac{S}{12} +a_i$$. We have the constraints $$\sum_{1}^{3}a_i =0$$ and $$A_i+A_j =\frac{S}{6}+a_i+a_j > 0$$ for $$i\neq j$$ because $$M$$ has positive isotropic curvature. By the change of variables $$x_i =1- \frac{6}{S}a_i$$, the constraints become $$\sum_{1}^{3} x_i =3$$ and $$x_i > 0$$ for $$1\leq i \leq 3$$, and the objective function becomes F(x1,x2,x3):=S∑13ai2−12∑13ai3=S336(∑13(1−xi)2−2(1−xi)3)=S336(2∑13xi3−5∑13xi2+9). Using Lagrange multipliers, we find two critical points $$Z=(1,1,1)$$ and $$W=\left(\frac{1}{3}, \frac{4}{3}, \frac{4}{3}\right) $$ with $$F(Z)= 0$$ and $$F(W)=\frac{S^3}{162} $$. On the boundary, we have $$x_i=0$$ for some $$i$$. Since $$F$$ is symmetric, we can assume without loss of generality that $$x_1 =0$$. Then we have, using $$x_3 =3-x_2$$, that F(x1,x2,x3)=S336(2(x23+(3−x2)3)−5(x22+(3−x2)2)+9)=S318(2x2−3)2≥0. Therefore, under the constraints $$\sum_{1}^{3}a_i =0$$ and $$\frac{S}{6}+a_i+a_j \geq 0$$ for $$i\neq j$$, F(x1,x2,x3)=S∑13ai2−12∑13ai3≥0. The terms involving $$c_i$$’s can be handled similarly. Hence $$P\leq 0$$. ■ Proof of Theorem 1.1. Recall, it was shown in [13, Proposition 4.2] that if $$S\neq 0$$, then (∂∂t−Δ)(|Rijkl|2S2)=4PS3−2S4|S∇pRijkl−∇pSRijkl|2+⟨∇(|Rijkl|2S2),∇logS2⟩. (3.2) Trying to use integration by parts here would require a stronger integral bound of the Ricci curvature than we actually have in Lemma 2.3. To overcome this difficulty, we adopt a similar idea that was used to prove $$BB^t =b^2 \operatorname{id}$$. We consider, instead, $$u =\frac{|R_{ijkl}|}{S}$$ and $$T=\frac{R_{ijkl}}{S}$$. A direct calculation shows that (∂∂t−Δ)u=2PuS3+⟨∇u,∇logS2⟩+|∇u|2−|∇T|2u≤2PuS3+⟨∇u,∇logS2⟩, where we have used Kato’s inequality in the last line. Now let $$\eta$$ be a smooth cut-off function with support in $$\{x\in M : d(x, x_0)\leq r\}$$ and $$|\nabla \eta | \leq C/r$$. Multiplying the above inequality by $$u e^{-f+\log{S^2} }\eta^2 $$ and integrating over $$M$$, we obtain, ∫M⟨∇f,∇u⟩ue−f+logS2η2−∫MΔu ue−f+logS2η2≤∫M2PS3e−f+logS2η2+∫M⟨∇u,∇logS2⟩ue−f+logS2η2. Integration by parts then yields 12∫M|∇u|2e−f+logS2η2−2∫MPSe−f≤−12∫M|∇u|2e−f+logS2η2−2∫M⟨∇u,∇η⟩uηe−f+logS2≤8∫M|∇η|2u2e−f+logS2≤Cr2∫M|Rijkl|2e−f. The integral $$\int_{M} |R_{ijkl}|^2 e^{-f}$$ is finite in view of Lemma 2.3, since if $$M$$ has positive isotropic curvature, then the components of curvature operator $$A, B$$ and $$C$$ can be estimated by −S4≤A1≤A2≤A3≤S4,−S4≤C1≤C2≤C3≤S4,4‖B‖≤|Ric∘|. Therefore, we know that $$u$$ is a positive constant and $$P=0$$ by letting $$r\to \infty$$. Then it follows from (3.2) that $$|S\nabla_pR_{ijkl}-\nabla_pS R_{ijkl}|^2=0$$. Theorem 1.1 then follows from the proof of the main theorem in [13]. ■ The strong maximum principle of [2] together with the classification of positive case implies the following corollary for the solitons with nonnegative isotropic curvature. Corollary 3.1. If $$(M, g, f)$$ is a complete gradient shrinking soliton with nonnegative isotropic curvature then its universal cover must be one of the following spaces $$\mathbb{R}^4$$, $$\mathbb{S}^4$$, $$\mathbb{C}P^2$$, $$\mathbb{S}^2\times \mathbb{S}^2$$, $$\mathbb{S}^2\times \mathbb{R}^2$$ and $$\mathbb{S}^3\times \mathbb{R}$$. □ This provides a more general classification result than that of [11], where the shrinking solitons are assumed to have bounded non-negative curvature operator. Funding This work was partially supported by an Inamori fellowship and National Science Foundation [DMS-1401500 to X.L.]; National Science Foundation [DMS-1401500 to L.N.]; National Natural Science Foundation of China [11601359 to K.W.]; and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20160301 to K.W.]. References [1] Brendle S. and Schoen. R. “Manifolds with 1/4-pinched curvature are space forms.” The Journal of the American Mathematical Society 22, no. 1 ( 2009): 287– 307. MR2449060 $$\uparrow$$2 Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [2] Brendle S. and Schoen. R. “Classification of manifolds with weakly 1/4-pinched curvatures.” Acta Mathematica 200, no. 1 ( 2008): 1– 13. $$\uparrow$$12 Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [3] Cao H.-D. and Zhou. D. “On complete gradient shrinking Ricci solitons.” Journal of Differential Geometry 85, no. 2 ( 2010): 175– 85. MR2732975 $$\uparrow$$2, 3 Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [4] Hamilton R. S. The formation of singularities in the Ricci flow , Surveys in differential geometry II ( 1993): 7– 136. MR1375255 $$\uparrow$$1, 2, 5 [5] Hamilton R. S. “Four-manifolds with positive isotropic curvature.” Communications in Analysis and Geometry 5, no. 1 ( 1997): 1– 92. MR1456308 $$\uparrow$$2 Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [6] Kotschwar B. and Wang. L. “Rigidity of asymptotically conical shrinking gradient Ricci solitons.” Journal of Differential Geometry 100, no. 1 ( 2015): 55– 108. MR3326574 $$\uparrow$$2 Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [7] Micallef M. J. and Douglas Moore. J. “Minimal two-spheres and the topology of manifolds with positive curvature on totally isotropic two-planes.” Annals of Mathematics 127, no. 1 ( 1988): 199– 227. MR0924677 $$\uparrow$$1 Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [8] Munteanu O. and Sesum. N. “On gradient Ricci solitons.” Journal of Geometric Analysis 23, no. 2 ( 2013): 539– 61, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-011-9252-6. MR3023848 $$\uparrow$$2, 3 Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [9] Munteanu O. and Wang. J. “Geometry of shrinking Ricci solitons.” Compositio Mathematica 151 ( 2015): 2273– 300. $$\uparrow$$2 Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [10] Munteanu O. and Wang. J. “Positively curved shrinking Ricci solitons are compact.” Journal of Differential Geometry to appear. $$\uparrow$$2 [11] Naber Aaron “Noncompact shrinking four solitons with nonnegative curvature.” Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 645 ( 2010): 125– 53. MR2673425 $$\uparrow$$2, 12 [12] Nguyen H. T. “Isotropic curvature and the Ricci flow.” International Mathematics Research Notices 3 ( 2010): 536C– 58. MR2587576 $$\uparrow$$2 Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [13] Ni L. and Wallach. N. “On a classification of gradient shrinking solitons.” Mathematical Research Letters 15, no. 5 ( 2008): 941– 55, https://doi.org/10.4310/MRL.2008.v15.n5.a9. MR2443993 $$\uparrow$$4, 5, 7, 10, 12 Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS [14] Ni L. and Wallach. N. “On four-dimensional gradient shrinking solitons.” International Mathematics Research Notices 4 ( 2008): Art. ID rnm152, 13, https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnm152. MR2424175 (2010g:53123) $$\uparrow$$1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 [15] Perelman G. Ricci flow with surgery on three-manifolds , arXiv: math.DG/ 0303109. $$\uparrow$$1 © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.

International Mathematics Research Notices – Oxford University Press

**Published: ** Feb 1, 2018

Loading...

personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly

**discover** and **read** the research

that matters to you.

Enjoy **affordable access** to

over 18 million articles from more than

**15,000 peer-reviewed journals**.

All for just $49/month

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from *SpringerNature*, *Elsevier*, *Wiley-Blackwell*, *Oxford University Press* and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

## “Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”

Daniel C.

## “Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”

@Phil_Robichaud

## “I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”

@deepthiw

## “My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”

@JoseServera

DeepDyve ## Freelancer | DeepDyve ## Pro | |
---|---|---|

Price | FREE | $49/month |

Save searches from | ||

Create lists to | ||

Export lists, citations | ||

Read DeepDyve articles | Abstract access only | Unlimited access to over |

20 pages / month | ||

PDF Discount | 20% off | |

Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.

System error. Please try again!

or

By signing up, you agree to DeepDyve’s Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Already have an account? Log in

Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.

To save an article, **log in** first, or **sign up** for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.