Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Evidence for the Adoption of the Flemma as an Appropriate Word Counting Unit

Evidence for the Adoption of the Flemma as an Appropriate Word Counting Unit Applied Linguistics 2018: 39/3: 442  Oxford University Press 2017 doi:10.1093/applin/amx003 Advance Access published on 6 March 2017 ERRATUM Evidence for the Adoption of the Flemma as an Appropriate Word Counting Unit 1,2, STUART MCLEAN 1 2 Osaka Jogakuin University, Japan, Graduate School of Foreign Language Education and Research, Kansai University, Japan E-mail: stuart93@me.com doi:10.1093/applin/amw050 Due to an error, this article was published before the final corrections had been made. One of the items of data in Table 4 (-ist, center) gave the previous value as 0.2 but has now been corrected to 0.42. The other corrections were non- academic in nature. This has now been corrected online, and we apologize for the error. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/applij/article-abstract/39/3/442/3062881 by Ed 'DeepDyve' Gillespie user on 20 June 2018 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Applied Linguistics Oxford University Press

Evidence for the Adoption of the Flemma as an Appropriate Word Counting Unit

Applied Linguistics , Volume Advance Article (3) – Mar 6, 2017

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ou_press/evidence-for-the-adoption-of-the-flemma-as-an-appropriate-word-h4KnYamxwv
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© Oxford University Press 2017
ISSN
0142-6001
eISSN
1477-450X
DOI
10.1093/applin/amx003
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Applied Linguistics 2018: 39/3: 442  Oxford University Press 2017 doi:10.1093/applin/amx003 Advance Access published on 6 March 2017 ERRATUM Evidence for the Adoption of the Flemma as an Appropriate Word Counting Unit 1,2, STUART MCLEAN 1 2 Osaka Jogakuin University, Japan, Graduate School of Foreign Language Education and Research, Kansai University, Japan E-mail: stuart93@me.com doi:10.1093/applin/amw050 Due to an error, this article was published before the final corrections had been made. One of the items of data in Table 4 (-ist, center) gave the previous value as 0.2 but has now been corrected to 0.42. The other corrections were non- academic in nature. This has now been corrected online, and we apologize for the error. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/applij/article-abstract/39/3/442/3062881 by Ed 'DeepDyve' Gillespie user on 20 June 2018

Journal

Applied LinguisticsOxford University Press

Published: Mar 6, 2017

There are no references for this article.