In our age of information overload and intense rivalry from social media the future of newspapers is unclear. A mass-media model appears no longer relevant and newspapers are moving towards niche versions. The debate on the role of the press has a long history. Goethe attacked the diversions offered by newspapers as a means of escape from social reality. Others offered a positive appraisal. Karl Marx considered the press a mechanism for promoting democracy and civil liberties. News coverage was contested terrain. Some saw journalism as an instrument of enlightenment; others rejected it as a vehicle of mass deception. The activities of an irresponsible and/or biased press remains a disputed topic to this day, recently fuelled by the deplorable level of reporting leading up to the Brexit debacle. By the same token, the decline of print has put professional journalism at peril. The time has arrived for bibliographers and historians to step in and measure the sociocultural impact newspapers have made over time. In Dutch and Flemish Newspapers of the Seventeenth Century Arthur der Weduwen, a researcher at the University of St Andrews, presents a comprehensive account of the early modern periodical press in the Low Countries. Composed of two well-presented volumes, this survey provides bibliographical descriptions of forty-nine newspapers, surviving in over 16,000 issues. In paying tribute to this painstaking effort, I can only think of one Dutch word for which there is no English equivalent: monnikenwerk. The introduction to the bibliography offers a picture of a competitive news market in which readers show a growing awareness of political realities at home and abroad, and publishers who are responsive to public demands whilst harnessing themselves against interference (and taxation) from the authorities. Commercial handwritten newsletters had circulated in Italy since the fifteenth century. These were fundamental to the promotion of trade. The first printed weekly newsletter was issued in 1605 in Strasbourg by Johann Carolus, who also ran a manuscript newsletter service. The printed newspaper was, initially, a mechanical imitation of the handwritten version. By the end of the century papers directed socio-political discussions in most European capitals. The Low Countries stood in the forefront of these developments. Antwerp was a centre of typography. The skilled manpower involved, the cost of machinery, and slow investment returns, made publishing a risky business. Printers not only needed financial backing, but also the means of communication to advertise their publications and the logistics to supply their agents. The city's dynamic economy created the operating conditions which attracted printers from far and wide. With the advent of the Reformation, Antwerp put religious controversy in print. Topicality was another aspect of typographic production. News sheets, mostly about political and commercial affairs, were spread in large numbers, usually by minor printers. Antwerp was the focus of information exchange in the sixteenth century. The Spanish sacking of the city in November 1576 brought about a mass migration of citizens to the northern Netherlands. The exodus of artisans, artists, printers, and publishers caused a shift in the balance of power within the Low Countries. Building on Flemish expertise, Holland created an unrivalled commercial, intellectual, and artistic empire. News gathering and information distribution moved to Amsterdam where a number of Dutch and multilingual courantoes were published. From 1618 onwards, an avid readership was informed by the appearance of weekly (sometimes bi- or triweekly) newspapers in broadsheet format at a time that, significantly, was gripped by religious and political controversy in the Republic. Such periodical publications had been preceded by—and for a considerable time ran parallel with—the folded news pamphlet. Because they dealt with topical issues, papers and pamphlets found their way through increasingly large segments of (urban) society. Their content was discussed amongst educated readers, thus multiplying their impact. Academic research into this type of material yields information about the spread and impact of ongoing news stories. It also supplies an understanding of developing standards and criteria of reporting. The word ‘courant’ itself, derived from the Dutch, became current in English during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. The first serialized newspapers to appear in England (in 1621) were printed in Amsterdam. News ‘out of Holland’ or ‘out of Amsterdam’ was a chief source of political information. From the onset there were ambiguous feelings towards newspapers: they were both eagerly awaited and frowned upon. Both Charles II and James II objected to the detailed reports on English affairs that were spread in Dutch gazettes. News publications undertaken by Milton, Defoe, or Nathaniel Mist were all modelled on Dutch examples. Newspapers are relevant sources for research in the humanities as they reflect the epoch in which they were created and provide an insight into socio-political issues of the day. They contain facts that cannot be uncovered elsewhere, even if reliability may be an issue. Their potential is not fully explored because of limited access to collections and the fragmented nature of those holdings even in major libraries. Retrieving information from early newspaper content remains problematical. A multinational program of digitization would be a step forward. These considerations underscore the value of this catalogue. News coverage as we know it oscillates between interpretation and manipulation. Testing one's information appears to be a tool that is no longer relevant. Objectivity is a maligned word. A cluster of terms (propaganda, bias, disinformation, lies, or fake news) has been or is being applied to accuse papers of bending the ‘truth’ for political gain or in order to deceive. Set against this backdrop, a detailed study of the coverage of events during the Anglo-Dutch Wars would be illuminating (and entertaining) reading. Equally, close scrutiny of press reports on the Fire of London could supply additional insights into the nuances of relations between the Netherlands and England. Der Weduwen's overview of the fledgling newspaper industry opens up the way into various unexplored territories of research. Is that not the ultimate price any bibliographer should aim for? © The Author 2018; all rights reserved This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices)
The Library – Oxford University Press
Published: Mar 1, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera