Corrigendum: The aggregate production function is NOT neoclassical

Corrigendum: The aggregate production function is NOT neoclassical Cambridge Journal of Economics 2018, 42, 595 doi:10.1093/cje/bex084 Advance Access publication 20 December 2017 Corrigendum The aggregate production function is NOT neoclassical Stefano Zambelli This is a correction notice for article bex011 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ bex011), published on 23 May 2017. The author regrets to inform that there were two instances of a missing delta symbol before an equation, one in section 2.5 and the other in section 3. These errors have now been corrected in the published article. © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/cje/article-abstract/42/2/595/4772969 by Ed 'DeepDyve' Gillespie user on 22 March 2018 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Cambridge Journal of Economics Oxford University Press

Corrigendum: The aggregate production function is NOT neoclassical

Free
1 page

Loading next page...
1 Page
 
/lp/ou_press/corrigendum-the-aggregate-production-function-is-not-neoclassical-FeNYhX4PHP
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0309-166X
eISSN
1464-3545
D.O.I.
10.1093/cje/bex084
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Cambridge Journal of Economics 2018, 42, 595 doi:10.1093/cje/bex084 Advance Access publication 20 December 2017 Corrigendum The aggregate production function is NOT neoclassical Stefano Zambelli This is a correction notice for article bex011 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/ bex011), published on 23 May 2017. The author regrets to inform that there were two instances of a missing delta symbol before an equation, one in section 2.5 and the other in section 3. These errors have now been corrected in the published article. © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/cje/article-abstract/42/2/595/4772969 by Ed 'DeepDyve' Gillespie user on 22 March 2018

Journal

Cambridge Journal of EconomicsOxford University Press

Published: Mar 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial