Corrigendum for “Revisiting the safety of aspartame” by Arbind Kumar Choudhary and Etheresia Pretorius Nutrition Reviews. 2017; 75(9): 718–730

Corrigendum for “Revisiting the safety of aspartame” by Arbind Kumar Choudhary and Etheresia... Corrigendum Corrigendum for “Revisiting the safety of aspartame” by Arbind Kumar Choudhary and Etheresia Pretorius Nutrition Reviews. 2017; 75(9): 718–730 In the version of the article that appeared online ahead of print on August 31, 2017, the following text appeared: The consumption of higher dosages of aspartame (> 40 mg/kg/d) is toxic to the brain, as it results in prolonged exposure 56–60,62–64,114,115 to oxidative stress. An author of reference 62 called attention to a mistaken interpretation of the cited work and the article was temporarily removed from the online platform for investigation. The text was revised as follows and the article was reposted online on October 3, 2017: 56–60,62–64 The consumption of higher dosages of aspartame (> 40 mg/kg/d) on the brain was also previously studied. 56–60,63–64 Results suggest that higher aspartame dosages may result in changed enzyme activities. It was also found, in an in vivo voltammetry study that aspartame decreases evoked extracellular dopamine levels in the rat brain. Brain areas af- fected by aspartame may include the cerebral cortex, hypothalamus and hippocampus, as shown in a paper by Iyyaswamy and Rathinasamy in 2012. Areas like the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex play important roles in memory 114,115 and decision making. This corrigendum is intended for readers who may have read the online version of the article that was posted on August 31, 2017. The print version of the article and the present online version contain the corrected text. The authors regret the initial misinterpretation. V C The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nux075 V R Nutrition Reviews Vol. 76(4):301 301 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nutritionreviews/article-abstract/76/4/301/4932774 by Ed 'DeepDyve' Gillespie user on 16 March 2018 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Nutrition Reviews Oxford University Press

Corrigendum for “Revisiting the safety of aspartame” by Arbind Kumar Choudhary and Etheresia Pretorius Nutrition Reviews. 2017; 75(9): 718–730

Nutrition Reviews , Volume 76 (4) – Apr 1, 2018
Free
1 page

Loading next page...
1 Page
 
/lp/ou_press/corrigendum-for-revisiting-the-safety-of-aspartame-by-arbind-kumar-50fEdm55we
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
ISSN
0029-6643
eISSN
1753-4887
D.O.I.
10.1093/nutrit/nux075
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Corrigendum Corrigendum for “Revisiting the safety of aspartame” by Arbind Kumar Choudhary and Etheresia Pretorius Nutrition Reviews. 2017; 75(9): 718–730 In the version of the article that appeared online ahead of print on August 31, 2017, the following text appeared: The consumption of higher dosages of aspartame (> 40 mg/kg/d) is toxic to the brain, as it results in prolonged exposure 56–60,62–64,114,115 to oxidative stress. An author of reference 62 called attention to a mistaken interpretation of the cited work and the article was temporarily removed from the online platform for investigation. The text was revised as follows and the article was reposted online on October 3, 2017: 56–60,62–64 The consumption of higher dosages of aspartame (> 40 mg/kg/d) on the brain was also previously studied. 56–60,63–64 Results suggest that higher aspartame dosages may result in changed enzyme activities. It was also found, in an in vivo voltammetry study that aspartame decreases evoked extracellular dopamine levels in the rat brain. Brain areas af- fected by aspartame may include the cerebral cortex, hypothalamus and hippocampus, as shown in a paper by Iyyaswamy and Rathinasamy in 2012. Areas like the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex play important roles in memory 114,115 and decision making. This corrigendum is intended for readers who may have read the online version of the article that was posted on August 31, 2017. The print version of the article and the present online version contain the corrected text. The authors regret the initial misinterpretation. V C The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nux075 V R Nutrition Reviews Vol. 76(4):301 301 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/nutritionreviews/article-abstract/76/4/301/4932774 by Ed 'DeepDyve' Gillespie user on 16 March 2018

Journal

Nutrition ReviewsOxford University Press

Published: Apr 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial