Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
IMF (2008)
“The Changing Housing Cycle and the Implications for Monetary Policy.”
Andrés (2011)
“Household Leverage and Fiscal Multipliers.”
IMF (2013)
“Technical Note on the Financial Situation of Italian Households and Nonfinancial Corporations and Risks to the Banking System.”
D’Aurizio (2006)
“The Under-Reporting of Financial Wealth in the Survey on Household Income and Wealth.”
Piazzesi (2016)
“Housing and Macroeconomics.”
Paiella (2017)
“Decomposing the Wealth Effect on Consumption.”
Calza (2013)
“Housing Finance and Monetary Policy.”Journal of the European Economic Association, 11
Norregaard (2013)
“Taxing Immovable Property Revenue Potential and Implementation Challenges.”
Deaton (1992)
“Understanding Consumption.”
Christelis (2017)
“Asymmetric Consumption Effects of Transitory Income Shocks.”
Oliviero (2016)
“Property Tax and Property Values: Evidence from the 2012 Italian Tax Reform.”
Guiso (2005)
“Do Capital Gains Affect Consumption? Estimates of Wealth Effects from Italian Households' Behavior.”
Aaronson (2012)
“The Spending and Debt Response to Minimum Wage Hikes.”American Economic Review, 7
Acconcia (2015)
“The Consumption Response to Liquidity-Enhancing Transfers: Evidence from Italian Earthquakes.”
Agarwal (2014)
“Consumption and Debt Response to Unanticipated Income Shocks: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Singapore.”
Mian (2013)
“Household Balance Sheets, Consumption, and the Economic Slump.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128
Zeldes (1992)
“‘Housing Markets, Consumption and Financial Liberalisation in the Major Economies’: by D. Miles.”European Economic Review, 36
Misra (2014)
“Consumption, Income Changes, and Heterogeneity: Evidence from Two Fiscal Stimulus Programs.”American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 6
Dynan (2012)
“Is a Household Debt Overhang Holding Back Consumption.”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 44
Jappelli (2014)
“Fiscal Policy and MPC Heterogeneity.”American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 6
Kaplan (2014)
“The Wealthy Hand-to-Mouth.”
Mian (2016)
“Who Bears the Cost of Recessions? The Role of House Prices and Household Debt.”
Kaplan (2014)
“A Model of the Consumption Response to Fiscal Stimulus Payments.”Econometrica, 82
IMF (2012)
“Italy: Technical Assistance Report—The Delega Fiscale and the Strategic Orientation of Tax Reform.”
Grembi (2012)
“Policy Responses to Fiscal Restraints: A Difference-in-Discontinuities Design.”
Grant (2008)
“Housing and Equity Wealth Effects of Italian Households.”
Campbell (2007)
“How do House Prices Affect Consumption? Evidence from Micro Data.”Journal of Monetary Economics, 54
Bocci (2012)
“Imu più equa con i valori di mercato.”
Eggertsson (2012)
“Debt, Deleveraging, and the Liquidity Trap: A Fisher-Minsky-Koo Approach.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127
Kiyotaki (1997)
“Credit Cycles.”Journal of Political Economy, 105
Born (2014)
“Does Austerity Pay Off?”
Johnson (2006)
“Household Expenditure and the Income Tax Rebates of 2001.”American Economic Review, 96
Parker (2013)
“Consumer Spending and the Economic Stimulus Payments of 2008.”American Economic Review, 103
Bunn (2017)
“The Consumption Response to Positive and Negative Income Changes.”
Mitman (2012)
“Macroeconomic Effects of Bankruptcy and Foreclosure Policies.”
Browning (2000)
“Luxuries Are Easier to Postpone: A Proof.”Journal of Political Economy, 5
Ragot (2014)
“The Case for a Financial Approach to Money Demand.”Journal of Monetary Economics, 62
Cloyne (2017)
“Household Debt and the Dynamic Effects of Income Tax Changes.”Review of Economic Studies, 84
A sudden and temporary change to the Italian property tax system in 2011 generated significant variation in the amount of taxes paid across home-owners. Using new questions appositely added to the Survey on Household Income and Wealth, we exploit this cross-sectional variation to provide an unprecedented analysis of the consumption effects of a tax on housing wealth. A tax hike on the main dwelling leads to large expenditure cuts among mortgagors, who hold low liquid wealth despite owning sizable illiquid assets. In contrast, higher tax rates on other residential properties affect affluent households, thereby having a modest impact on their consumer spending. Our results provide novel and direct evidence in favor of recent theories that highlight the role of household debt in the transmission of economic policies.
Journal of the European Economic Association – Oxford University Press
Published: Apr 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.