Bonnie Thomas’s study offers a wide-ranging and inclusive analysis of autobiographical and auto-fictional works by various authors from the francophone Caribbean diaspora. Incorporating both male and female writers from the DOM-TOM territories of Martinique and Guadeloupe alongside authors from Haiti, Thomas encompasses islands often viewed as disparate political and cultural entities and avoids perpetuating the gendered divisions present in much existing criticism. Thomas seeks connections, rather than distinctions, between and among these writers, their homelands, their identities, and their subject matter. Relying on the theoretical framework of Édouard Glissant’s Relation, as set out in Poétique de la relation (Paris: Gallimard, 1990), she draws together autobiographical works by some of the most canonical contemporary writers from the region — Maryse Condé, Gisèle Pineau, Patrick Chamoiseau, Edwidge Danticat, and Dany Laferrière — placing these in the context of a globalized ‘tout-monde’. By viewing these authors and their work through the prisms of relational, rhizomatic, connected identities, Thomas emphasizes the bonds between the peoples, cultures, histories, and memories of the region, producing an ‘interrogation of the past through [the] personal narratives’ of these writers (p. 22). The Introduction outlines the historical, social, political, cultural, and literary background of the islands and their political contexts, dealing with the fundamental trauma of slavery and its inescapable legacy for the peoples of the region. Yet Thomas explicitly aims to move beyond this traumatic past, just as the authors themselves do, by resituating trauma in a network of Relation, and exploring and engaging with both the History and histories of the region to forge a path towards reconciliation and liberation. She focuses on one writer and three autobiographical texts per chapter, foregrounding works that engage with questions of identity, self-perception, and belonging, and which often also include meta-literary contemplations on the nature of memory itself. After analysing the works individually in each chapter, Thomas brings together the five writers collectively alongside Glissant’s theory in the conclusion. This provides a sense of balance between the individual analyses and the overarching theoretical focus of the text, and allows the authors, their literature, and their theory to ‘speak’ to each other. Moreover, the theoretical framework does not constrain the analysis, as Thomas allows a sense of the individual writers and their positions to develop alongside the theoretical focus of the study. Overall, Thomas brings an extremely insightful and productive apparatus to bear on the fascinating work of these five authors. This work is a welcome contribution both to the growing body of Glissantian analysis and to the study of Antillean (autobiographical) fiction. © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for French Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: email@example.com This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices)
French Studies – Oxford University Press
Published: Jul 1, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera