Commentary: Comparison Between CTA and Digital Subtraction Angiography in the Diagnosis of Ruptured Aneurysms

Commentary: Comparison Between CTA and Digital Subtraction Angiography in the Diagnosis of... COMMENTARY Commentary: Comparison Between CTA and Digital Subtraction Angiography in the Diagnosis of Ruptured Aneurysms were 76.7% and 46.4%, respectively. Unfortu- he paper by Philipp et al addresses Sanjay Konakondla, MD nately, other important factors as interobserver the issues of the reliability of diagnostic Clemens M. Schirmer, MD, variability and the conditional flow of infor- T imaging modalities in the setting of mation in therealworld whereanangiogram nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage with PhD is most often a second test following a cross- particular regard to the sensitivity and specificity Department of Neurosurgery and sectional imaging test were not addressed in a of Computed tomography angiography (CTA) Neuroscience Institute, Geisinger Health comprehensive fashion. vs Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA). With System, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania this retrospective analysis of a large cohort of 401 It hardly comes as a surprise that other attempts preceding this have been published, patients in a single-institution over 4 years, the Correspondence: Clemens M. Schirmer, MD, PhD, authors report an overall CTA sensitivity of 71%. see, for example, MacKinnon et al who derive Department of Neurosurgery and slight different results with CTA had 95.2% In general, it confirms that there are aneurysms Neuroscience Institute, sensitivity, 97.2% specificity, 98.1% positive that http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Neurosurgery Oxford University Press

Commentary: Comparison Between CTA and Digital Subtraction Angiography in the Diagnosis of Ruptured Aneurysms

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ou_press/commentary-comparison-between-cta-and-digital-subtraction-angiography-WOz1wPfTXS
Publisher
Congress of Neurological Surgeons
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons
ISSN
0148-396X
eISSN
1524-4040
D.O.I.
10.1093/neuros/nyw115
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

COMMENTARY Commentary: Comparison Between CTA and Digital Subtraction Angiography in the Diagnosis of Ruptured Aneurysms were 76.7% and 46.4%, respectively. Unfortu- he paper by Philipp et al addresses Sanjay Konakondla, MD nately, other important factors as interobserver the issues of the reliability of diagnostic Clemens M. Schirmer, MD, variability and the conditional flow of infor- T imaging modalities in the setting of mation in therealworld whereanangiogram nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage with PhD is most often a second test following a cross- particular regard to the sensitivity and specificity Department of Neurosurgery and sectional imaging test were not addressed in a of Computed tomography angiography (CTA) Neuroscience Institute, Geisinger Health comprehensive fashion. vs Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA). With System, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania this retrospective analysis of a large cohort of 401 It hardly comes as a surprise that other attempts preceding this have been published, patients in a single-institution over 4 years, the Correspondence: Clemens M. Schirmer, MD, PhD, authors report an overall CTA sensitivity of 71%. see, for example, MacKinnon et al who derive Department of Neurosurgery and slight different results with CTA had 95.2% In general, it confirms that there are aneurysms Neuroscience Institute, sensitivity, 97.2% specificity, 98.1% positive that

Journal

NeurosurgeryOxford University Press

Published: May 1, 2017

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off