Comment sortir de l’Empire? Le Groupe de Coppet face à la chute de Napoléon. Sous la direction de Léonard Burnand et Guillaume Poisson

Comment sortir de l’Empire? Le Groupe de Coppet face à la chute de Napoléon. Sous la... REVIEWS 441 is to be commended, is important for scholars of the Napoleonic era, in its military as well as literary aspects. DANIEL ROSENBERG doi:10.1093/fs/kny112 HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM Comment sortir de l’Empire? Le Groupe de Coppet face a` la chute de Napol´o e n. Sous la direction de LEONARD BURNAND et GUILLAUME POISSON. (Travaux et recherches de l’Institut Benjamin Constant, 16.) Gene`ve: Slatkine, 2016. 350 pp., ill. This is an edited volume of papers from a conference in 2014, looking at how Germaine de Stae¨l, Benjamin Constant, and Jean-Charles-Le´onard-Simonde de Sismondi reacted to events in 1814 and 1815, an intensely unstable period in France. The articles cover the ways in which the three political theoreticians reflected on the reshaping of Europe after Napoleon’s first and second abdications. The volume opens with Emmanuel de Waresquiel’s magisterial overview of 1814 as a turning point, with a particular focus on how the period offered ‘l’apprentissage des pratiques du politique et de la politique’ (p. 31). The twin themes of politics and liberty underpin the remaining essays in the volume, made up of five articles on Stae¨l, three on Constant, and four on Sismondi. Robert Morrissey re-examines Stae¨l and Napoleon’s concept of ‘gloire’, and Florence Lotterie takes the concept of ‘virtu’ as her starting point for a study of the relationship between ‘affect et politique’ (p. 80), in two wide-ranging conceptual essays. Stae¨l’s concept of celebrity and her comparison of a French centralized culture of celebrity and Germany’s decentralized version are tackled by Marie-Eve Beausoleil. Two articles then look at the Conside´rations sur la Re´volution franc¸aise:Ge´rard Gengembre and Jean Goldzink focus on the sections of the Conside´rations devoted to ‘cette anne´e 1814 ou`se joue l’avenir des acquis de la Re´volution et celui de la nation’ (p. 83); Laura Broccado demonstrates how Stae¨l’s father, Jacques Necker, is the overarching structuring device in the Conside´rations. The three Constant papers complement each other well. Giovanni Paoletti uses the Re´flexions sur les constitutions et les garanties to reflect on Constant’s concept of liberty and his belief that France as a country was filled with fear that could only be controlled by politics. The acte additionnel, known also, of course, as ‘la benjamine’, is the topic of Jose´e Bloquet’s article, while Paul Rowe traces the human side of the end of the Empire by looking at Constant’s domestic correspondence to underline the extent to which ‘il est impossible de se´parer les crises financie`res, politiques et sentimentales de Constant a` la chute de l’Empire’ (p. 178). Francesca Sofia and Maria Pia Casalena also look at correspondence, using Sismondi’s letters from his arrival in Paris in 1813 until 1817 to explore how he served as a link between the North and the Midi. Luca Mannori focuses on Sismondi’s reflections on political legitimacy, while Adrian Lyttelton compares Constant and Sismondi’s views of the British political system, concluding that their engagement with it helps each of them distinguish the particular from the universal in their subsequent writings on politics. The final essay extends the chronology of the vol- ume to 1818: Nicolas Eyguesier looks at the role of British writing in the genesis of Sismondi’s Nouveaux Principes d’´economie politique. There is much good material in the vol- ume that will allow readers to make fruitful links between the three writers at its heart. KATHERINE ASTBURY doi:10.1093/fs/kny080 UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/fs/article-abstract/72/3/441/4995855 by Ed 'DeepDyve' Gillespie user on 31 July 2018 http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png French Studies Oxford University Press

Comment sortir de l’Empire? Le Groupe de Coppet face à la chute de Napoléon. Sous la direction de Léonard Burnand et Guillaume Poisson

French Studies , Volume 72 (3) – Jul 1, 2018
Free
1 page

Loading next page...
1 Page
 
/lp/ou_press/comment-sortir-de-l-empire-le-groupe-de-coppet-face-la-chute-de-napol-UMSeXs2AoW
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for French Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
ISSN
0016-1128
eISSN
1468-2931
D.O.I.
10.1093/fs/kny080
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

REVIEWS 441 is to be commended, is important for scholars of the Napoleonic era, in its military as well as literary aspects. DANIEL ROSENBERG doi:10.1093/fs/kny112 HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM Comment sortir de l’Empire? Le Groupe de Coppet face a` la chute de Napol´o e n. Sous la direction de LEONARD BURNAND et GUILLAUME POISSON. (Travaux et recherches de l’Institut Benjamin Constant, 16.) Gene`ve: Slatkine, 2016. 350 pp., ill. This is an edited volume of papers from a conference in 2014, looking at how Germaine de Stae¨l, Benjamin Constant, and Jean-Charles-Le´onard-Simonde de Sismondi reacted to events in 1814 and 1815, an intensely unstable period in France. The articles cover the ways in which the three political theoreticians reflected on the reshaping of Europe after Napoleon’s first and second abdications. The volume opens with Emmanuel de Waresquiel’s magisterial overview of 1814 as a turning point, with a particular focus on how the period offered ‘l’apprentissage des pratiques du politique et de la politique’ (p. 31). The twin themes of politics and liberty underpin the remaining essays in the volume, made up of five articles on Stae¨l, three on Constant, and four on Sismondi. Robert Morrissey re-examines Stae¨l and Napoleon’s concept of ‘gloire’, and Florence Lotterie takes the concept of ‘virtu’ as her starting point for a study of the relationship between ‘affect et politique’ (p. 80), in two wide-ranging conceptual essays. Stae¨l’s concept of celebrity and her comparison of a French centralized culture of celebrity and Germany’s decentralized version are tackled by Marie-Eve Beausoleil. Two articles then look at the Conside´rations sur la Re´volution franc¸aise:Ge´rard Gengembre and Jean Goldzink focus on the sections of the Conside´rations devoted to ‘cette anne´e 1814 ou`se joue l’avenir des acquis de la Re´volution et celui de la nation’ (p. 83); Laura Broccado demonstrates how Stae¨l’s father, Jacques Necker, is the overarching structuring device in the Conside´rations. The three Constant papers complement each other well. Giovanni Paoletti uses the Re´flexions sur les constitutions et les garanties to reflect on Constant’s concept of liberty and his belief that France as a country was filled with fear that could only be controlled by politics. The acte additionnel, known also, of course, as ‘la benjamine’, is the topic of Jose´e Bloquet’s article, while Paul Rowe traces the human side of the end of the Empire by looking at Constant’s domestic correspondence to underline the extent to which ‘il est impossible de se´parer les crises financie`res, politiques et sentimentales de Constant a` la chute de l’Empire’ (p. 178). Francesca Sofia and Maria Pia Casalena also look at correspondence, using Sismondi’s letters from his arrival in Paris in 1813 until 1817 to explore how he served as a link between the North and the Midi. Luca Mannori focuses on Sismondi’s reflections on political legitimacy, while Adrian Lyttelton compares Constant and Sismondi’s views of the British political system, concluding that their engagement with it helps each of them distinguish the particular from the universal in their subsequent writings on politics. The final essay extends the chronology of the vol- ume to 1818: Nicolas Eyguesier looks at the role of British writing in the genesis of Sismondi’s Nouveaux Principes d’´economie politique. There is much good material in the vol- ume that will allow readers to make fruitful links between the three writers at its heart. KATHERINE ASTBURY doi:10.1093/fs/kny080 UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/fs/article-abstract/72/3/441/4995855 by Ed 'DeepDyve' Gillespie user on 31 July 2018

Journal

French StudiesOxford University Press

Published: Jul 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off