Sir, Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) reports are used by clinicians to guide antibiotic treatment of patients suffering from infectious diseases. AST reports, such as those based on the Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion test, in general do not include raw data, but an interpretation of the data in clinical categories (resistant, intermediate, susceptible), which reflect the likelihood of therapeutic success.1 This practice is intended to provide clinicians with clear and unambiguous clinical information. However, it entails a major loss of data. In contrast to results from clinical chemistry or haematology, where methodological precision measurements and quantitative results are implemented in the reports, these are absent in AST reports, where a mere classification into clinical categories is performed on the basis of inhibition zone measurements or MIC determinations. As a consequence, AST reports do not allow estimation of the probabilities of miscategorization, especially for measurements close to the clinical breakpoints (CBPs), where the error probability is higher.2,3 Since 2014, AST categorization of most drug/species combinations has depended exclusively on MIC and/or inhibition zone measurements.4 However, AST methods still suffer from a notable methodological variability, which can lead to miscategorization of a clinical isolate. Different miscategorization types are defined on the basis of the therapeutic implications. Erratic classifications of true-susceptible isolates as resistant are considered major errors (MEs), misclassifications of true-resistant isolates as susceptible are referred to as very major errors (vMEs) and false assignments of bacterial isolates to adjacent interpretative categories (S→I, I→S, I→R) are considered minor errors (mEs). The rates of MEs, vMEs and mEs depend on a number of factors: (i) presence and width of an intermediate zone; (ii) position of a population relative to the CBP; and (iii) methodological variation. The latter parameter includes both the methodological imprecision (inoculum size, agar composition, incubation time, disc content, inter- and intra-person variability in the reading) and the biological variation.5 Here we report on Antibiotrust, a software that visualizes the antibiogram and the reliability of the categorization. Antibiotrust was developed with the aim of conveying a graphic report displaying AST data from Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion testing. However, this approach can also be used for data based on MIC determination. As shown in Figure 1, Antibiotrust reports display the inhibition zone diameters of antibiotic panels used for the various bacterial groups (e.g. Enterobacteriaceae). The rectangular boxes correspond to the various antibiotics and are partitioned into the interpretative categories [resistant (r) in red, intermediate (i) in yellow and susceptible (s) in green]. Inhibition zone diameter distributions within the susceptible WT population appear in green shades, which become darker with higher prevalences. The distributions are based on local data and are updated each year. This feature is particularly relevant for susceptible clinical isolates, as it visualizes the position of the tested clinical isolate relative to the distribution of the WT population as derived from local epidemiological data. Black boxes and error bars indicate the inhibition zone diameter along with the methodological variation. The latter significantly influences the classification reliability and thereby the rate of MEs and vMEs.3 The width of the error bars is continuously updated for each combination of antibiotic and species or bacterial group and is given by the 2-fold standard deviation of weekly repeated measurements of inhibition zones of a quality-control strain. The interpretative category is displayed on the left side of the antibiotic box and is accompanied by the reliability of the categorization, which is calculated separately for all antibiotics using a normal model.2 Intrinsic antibiotic resistances are displayed in blue (e.g. ampicillin for Klebsiella pneumoniae). Monochromatic boxes display interpretative categorizations that are deduced from other antibiotics (i.e. ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin from norfloxacin) in agreement with EUCAST-derived in-house expert interpretation rules.6 Reliabilities are not determined for intrinsic resistances, deduced interpretations and for antibiotic/species combinations classified as intermediate. Figure 1 View largeDownload slide Antibiogram visualized with Antibiotrust. The graphic report of a Kirby–Bauer antibiotic testing of a K. pneumoniae strain isolated from an inpatient at the University Hospital of Zürich is depicted. Figure 1 View largeDownload slide Antibiogram visualized with Antibiotrust. The graphic report of a Kirby–Bauer antibiotic testing of a K. pneumoniae strain isolated from an inpatient at the University Hospital of Zürich is depicted. Several studies have shown a good correlation between MIC values and inhibition zone diameters in several bacterial species.7,8 A prospective integration of MIC values inferred from disc diffusion assays by Antibiotrust may further advance the accuracy of the AST reports and allow a better estimate of the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. The additional information provided by Antibiotrust will help in choosing the most appropriate antibiotic, as clinicians will be in the position to select the drug with the highest reliability of categorization and thus likelihood of therapeutic success. In conclusion, we describe an automated visualization software that includes indicators of interpretation reliability in AST reports based on the local epidemiological situation and methodological variation. The integration of reliabilities of misclassifications together with a graphic visualization will allow improved therapeutic decision making based on AST reports. Acknowledgements We are grateful to the technicians of the Institute of Medical Microbiology for expert help and assistance. Funding This work was supported by the University of Zürich. Transparency declarations None to declare. References 1 EUCAST . Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing - EUCAST Disk Diffusion Method, Version 6.0, 2017. www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Disk_test_documents/Version_5/Manual_v_6.0_EUCAST_Disk_Test_final.pdf. 2 Hombach M , Böttger EC , Roos M. The critical influence of the intermediate category on interpretation errors in revised EUCAST and CLSI antimicrobial susceptibility testing . Clin Microbiol Infect 2012 ; 19 : 59 – 71 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS 3 Blöchliger N , Keller PM , Böttger EC et al. MASTER: a model to improve and standardize clinical breakpoints for antimicrobial susceptibility testing using forecast probabilities . J Antimicrob Chemother 2017 ; 72 : 3864 – 9 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS 4 EUCAST . Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters, Version 8.0, 2018. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_8.0_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf. 5 Hombach M , Maurer FP , Pfiffner T et al. Standardization of operator-dependent variables affecting precision and accuracy of the disk diffusion method for antibiotic susceptibility testing . J Clin Microbiol 2015 ; 53 : 2553 – 61 . 6 Leclercq R , Cantón R , Brown DFJ et al. EUCAST expert rules in antimicrobial susceptibility testing . Clin Microbiol Infect 2013 ; 19 : 141 – 60 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed 7 Jacobs MR , Bajaksouzian S , Palavecino-Fasola EL et al. Determination of penicillin MICs for Streptococcus pneumoniae by using a two- or three-disk diffusion procedure . J Clin Microbiol 1998 ; 36 : 179 – 83 . Google Scholar PubMed 8 Bruin JP , Diederen BMW , Ijzerman PF et al. Correlation of MIC value and disk inhibition zone diameters in clinical Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates . Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2013 ; 76 : 339 – 42 . Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact email@example.com
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy – Oxford University Press
Published: Apr 17, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera