Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Functional and Radiographic Long-term Outcome after Laminectomy and Posterior Fusion

Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Functional and Radiographic Long-term Outcome after Laminectomy... ABSTRACTOBJECTIVE:To evaluate the long-term efficacy of cervical laminectomy with posterior lateral mass fusion/fixation in the treatment of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).METHOD:Twenty-five patients treated for CSM by laminectomy and lateral mass fusion at the Division of Neurosurgery at The Ohio State University between 1989 and 1994 were studied retrospectively. Only patients with longer than 2-year postoperative follow-up durations were included. At follow-up examination, each patient completed an SF36 questionnaire, underwent a physical examination, underwent plain radiography showing the spinal curvature with plate and screw position, and underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine, which evaluated dural sac decompression and spinal cord abnormalities. Patient-generated data were used for outcome measurements.RESULTS:The mean follow-up duration was 47.5 months. Good outcome was defined by the presence of three criteria: ability to walk unassisted (Grade IIIA or better), ability to write unassisted, and ability to manage buttons and/or zippers unassisted. The inability to meet these criteria was defined as a poor outcome. Two patients (8%) experienced complications that resulted from the surgery. There was no instability or progression to significant kyphosis. Lesions that were hyperintense on magnetic resonance images did not correlate with outcome. Eighty percent of the patients achieved good outcomes, and 76% had improved myelopathy scores. None of the patients had late neurological deterioration. Patients with better neurological statuses at the time of surgery (Grade IIIA or better) were more likely to improve (P < 0.0001); the likelihood of a change in status for those starting with poorer grades (IIIB or worse) was not statistically significant (P < 0.08).CONCLUSION:Cervical laminectomy with posterior fusion/fixation proved useful in the treatment of patients with CSM with straight or lordotic spines and multilevel compression. This therapy addresses the dynamic and compressive forces that are important in the pathogenesis of CSM, resulting in minimal complications and possible improvement in long-term outcomes. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Neurosurgery Oxford University Press

Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Functional and Radiographic Long-term Outcome after Laminectomy and Posterior Fusion

Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Functional and Radiographic Long-term Outcome after Laminectomy and Posterior Fusion

Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Functional and Radiographic Long-term Outcome after Laminectomy and Posterior Fusion Vijay G.R. Kumar, F.R.C.S., Gary L. Rea, M.D., Ph.D., Lawrence J. Mervis, M.D., John M. McGregor, M.D. Division of Neurosurgery, The O hio State University M edical Center, Columbus, Ohio OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of cervical laminectomy with posterior lateral mass fusion/fixation in the treatment of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM ). METHOD: Twenty-five patients treated for CSM by laminectomy and lateral mass fusion at the Division of Neurosurgery at The Ohio State University between 1989 and 1994 were studied retrospectively. O nly patients with longer than 2-year postoperative follow-up durations were included. At follow-up examination, each patient completed an SF36 questionnaire, underwent a physical examination, underwent plain radiography showing the spinal curva­ ture with plate and screw position, and underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine, which evaluated dural sac decompression and spinal cord abnormalities. Patient-generated data were used for outcome measurements. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 47.5 months. Good outcome was defined by the presence of three criteria: ability to walk unassisted (Grade 111A or better), ability to write unassisted, and ability to manage buttons and/or zippers unassisted. The inability to meet these criteria was defined as a poor outcome. Two patients (8 % ) experienced complications that resulted from the surgery. There was no instability or progression to significant kyphosis. Lesions that were hyperintense on magnetic resonance images did not correlate with outcome. Eighty percent of the patients achieved good outcomes, and 7 6 % had improved myelopathy scores. None of the patients had late neurological deterioration. Patients with better neurological statuses at the time of surgery (Grade IIIA or better) were more likely to...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/ou_press/cervical-spondylotic-myelopathy-functional-and-radiographic-long-term-pz6Q3fxKku
Publisher
Congress of Neurological Surgeons
Copyright
© Published by Oxford University Press.
ISSN
0148-396X
eISSN
1524-4040
D.O.I.
10.1097/00006123-199904000-00046
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

ABSTRACTOBJECTIVE:To evaluate the long-term efficacy of cervical laminectomy with posterior lateral mass fusion/fixation in the treatment of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).METHOD:Twenty-five patients treated for CSM by laminectomy and lateral mass fusion at the Division of Neurosurgery at The Ohio State University between 1989 and 1994 were studied retrospectively. Only patients with longer than 2-year postoperative follow-up durations were included. At follow-up examination, each patient completed an SF36 questionnaire, underwent a physical examination, underwent plain radiography showing the spinal curvature with plate and screw position, and underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine, which evaluated dural sac decompression and spinal cord abnormalities. Patient-generated data were used for outcome measurements.RESULTS:The mean follow-up duration was 47.5 months. Good outcome was defined by the presence of three criteria: ability to walk unassisted (Grade IIIA or better), ability to write unassisted, and ability to manage buttons and/or zippers unassisted. The inability to meet these criteria was defined as a poor outcome. Two patients (8%) experienced complications that resulted from the surgery. There was no instability or progression to significant kyphosis. Lesions that were hyperintense on magnetic resonance images did not correlate with outcome. Eighty percent of the patients achieved good outcomes, and 76% had improved myelopathy scores. None of the patients had late neurological deterioration. Patients with better neurological statuses at the time of surgery (Grade IIIA or better) were more likely to improve (P < 0.0001); the likelihood of a change in status for those starting with poorer grades (IIIB or worse) was not statistically significant (P < 0.08).CONCLUSION:Cervical laminectomy with posterior fusion/fixation proved useful in the treatment of patients with CSM with straight or lordotic spines and multilevel compression. This therapy addresses the dynamic and compressive forces that are important in the pathogenesis of CSM, resulting in minimal complications and possible improvement in long-term outcomes.

Journal

NeurosurgeryOxford University Press

Published: Apr 1, 1999

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial