Broken Glass, Broken World: Glass in French Culture in the Aftermath of 1870. By Hannah Scott

Broken Glass, Broken World: Glass in French Culture in the Aftermath of 1870. By Hannah Scott This book is an outstanding contribution to an increasingly important field of study: the activating relationship between material culture and literary texts. Substantial and innovative chapters are devoted to Zola, Maupassant, and Huysmans, prefaced by a richly informative account of the proliferation of glass objects and structures, from the monumental to the miniscule, in nineteenth-century France. Hannah Scott’s more particular focus is the année terrible, experienced by contemporaries as a shaking and shattering of windows so resonant as to endow broken glass of every kind with a symbolic association informing the writing of the post-1870 generation. It is argued that, until about 1890 and the revalidation subsequently exemplified by the practitioners of Art nouveau, the negative or ambivalent connotations of glass haunt the collective memory. What is called here ‘Flaws in the Visual’ (p. 58) has recently been explored at length in Émilie Piton-Foucault’s Zola ou la fenêtre condamnée (Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2015; see FS, 71 (2017), 120–22). In the critical perspective adopted by Scott, however, the window is less a traditional metaphor vitiated by optical blurring than the literal site, as in Gustave Caillebotte’s pictures, of the ‘disconcerting permeability of bourgeois space’ (p. 16). Ranging from topographical markers to the bottles hurled by the pétroleuses or fuelling the alcohol-deranged Communards of the popular imagination, the oblique allusions to the Franco-Prussian War and its revolutionary epilogue are, at least in Zola and Huysmans, ubiquitous. In Au bonheur des dames, even the ‘emphatic contrast’ (p. 54) between the darkened windows of Baudu’s vieux commerce, juxtaposed to the vitreous purity of the new department store, evokes a traumatic past. As does the ‘looting’ of the latter’s commodities by invading shoppers. Whether Zola’s ‘lexical choices’ (p. 68), in his recourse to a sublimated ‘débâcle’, are as telling is less certain. In the preparatory notes for La Curée, dating from 1869, he uses the same term (capitalized and underlined, no less) in relation to his protagonist’s fortunes: ‘Plus tard la DÉBÂCLE aura lieu’. It would have been interesting to scrutinize that novel, in which glass is also notoriously prevalent, through the analytical grid so acutely brought to bear on others such as Le Ventre de Paris, given that La Curée, with the exception of its opening chapter, was written in the months immediately after the Commune. But if that is to stress the suggestive avenues opened up by Scott’s attention to textual detail, it is also to misrepresent the thrust of her intellectually sophisticated but engagingly written book. For her real concern is the ways in which a variety of mirroring surfaces articulate different fictional responses to the events of 1870–71: putative reconciliation in Zola; alienation in Maupassant’s short stories, extending an ‘aesthetic of anxiety’ (p. 81) to the narrative techniques aggravating the reader’s own sense of insecurity; and the reconfiguration of literary modernity in Huysmans’s À rebours. The chapter devoted to the latter is both brilliant and wholly original, grounded in Des Esseintes’s conservatory conjuring ‘an immense body of intertextual glass imagery’ (p. 115). What these complex responses have broadly in common is the problematizing of national, class, cultural, and gender identities. Whether this can be tracked back exclusively to the année terrible, as opposed to the myriad dislocations in France since 1789, is another question. © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for French Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices) http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png French Studies Oxford University Press

Broken Glass, Broken World: Glass in French Culture in the Aftermath of 1870. By Hannah Scott

French Studies , Volume 72 (3) – Jul 1, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/ou_press/broken-glass-broken-world-glass-in-french-culture-in-the-aftermath-of-Jje8bXUPqQ
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for French Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
ISSN
0016-1128
eISSN
1468-2931
D.O.I.
10.1093/fs/kny095
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This book is an outstanding contribution to an increasingly important field of study: the activating relationship between material culture and literary texts. Substantial and innovative chapters are devoted to Zola, Maupassant, and Huysmans, prefaced by a richly informative account of the proliferation of glass objects and structures, from the monumental to the miniscule, in nineteenth-century France. Hannah Scott’s more particular focus is the année terrible, experienced by contemporaries as a shaking and shattering of windows so resonant as to endow broken glass of every kind with a symbolic association informing the writing of the post-1870 generation. It is argued that, until about 1890 and the revalidation subsequently exemplified by the practitioners of Art nouveau, the negative or ambivalent connotations of glass haunt the collective memory. What is called here ‘Flaws in the Visual’ (p. 58) has recently been explored at length in Émilie Piton-Foucault’s Zola ou la fenêtre condamnée (Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes, 2015; see FS, 71 (2017), 120–22). In the critical perspective adopted by Scott, however, the window is less a traditional metaphor vitiated by optical blurring than the literal site, as in Gustave Caillebotte’s pictures, of the ‘disconcerting permeability of bourgeois space’ (p. 16). Ranging from topographical markers to the bottles hurled by the pétroleuses or fuelling the alcohol-deranged Communards of the popular imagination, the oblique allusions to the Franco-Prussian War and its revolutionary epilogue are, at least in Zola and Huysmans, ubiquitous. In Au bonheur des dames, even the ‘emphatic contrast’ (p. 54) between the darkened windows of Baudu’s vieux commerce, juxtaposed to the vitreous purity of the new department store, evokes a traumatic past. As does the ‘looting’ of the latter’s commodities by invading shoppers. Whether Zola’s ‘lexical choices’ (p. 68), in his recourse to a sublimated ‘débâcle’, are as telling is less certain. In the preparatory notes for La Curée, dating from 1869, he uses the same term (capitalized and underlined, no less) in relation to his protagonist’s fortunes: ‘Plus tard la DÉBÂCLE aura lieu’. It would have been interesting to scrutinize that novel, in which glass is also notoriously prevalent, through the analytical grid so acutely brought to bear on others such as Le Ventre de Paris, given that La Curée, with the exception of its opening chapter, was written in the months immediately after the Commune. But if that is to stress the suggestive avenues opened up by Scott’s attention to textual detail, it is also to misrepresent the thrust of her intellectually sophisticated but engagingly written book. For her real concern is the ways in which a variety of mirroring surfaces articulate different fictional responses to the events of 1870–71: putative reconciliation in Zola; alienation in Maupassant’s short stories, extending an ‘aesthetic of anxiety’ (p. 81) to the narrative techniques aggravating the reader’s own sense of insecurity; and the reconfiguration of literary modernity in Huysmans’s À rebours. The chapter devoted to the latter is both brilliant and wholly original, grounded in Des Esseintes’s conservatory conjuring ‘an immense body of intertextual glass imagery’ (p. 115). What these complex responses have broadly in common is the problematizing of national, class, cultural, and gender identities. Whether this can be tracked back exclusively to the année terrible, as opposed to the myriad dislocations in France since 1789, is another question. © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for French Studies. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/about_us/legal/notices)

Journal

French StudiesOxford University Press

Published: Jul 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off