Abstract Urban rivers constitute a major part of urban drainage systems, and play critical roles in connecting other surface waters in urban areas. Black-odorous urban rivers are widely found in developing countries experiencing rapid urbanization, and the mismatch between urbanization and sewage treatment is thought to be the reason. The phenomena of blackening and odorization are likely complex bio-geochemical processes of which the microbial interactions with the environment are not fully understood. Here, we provide an overview of the major chemical compounds, such as iron and sulfur, and their bio-geochemical conversions during blackening and odorization of urban rivers. Scenarios explaining the formation of black-odorous urban rivers are proposed. Finally, we point out knowledge gaps in mechanisms and microbial ecology that need to be addressed to better understand the development of black-odorous urban rivers. black-odorous, urban river, bio-geochemical process, blackening and odorization, sediment INTRODUCTION Rivers and lakes serve urban populations as water resources and drainage systems. They play important roles as domestic, industrial and agricultural water resources. Urban rivers are also a convenient route of transportation and as centers for aquatic recreation impact on property prices and city development decisions. However, rapid urbanization caused by fast population growth often does not keep pace with construction of sewage treatment systems, resulting in visible and smellable pollution of urban rivers. Historically, rapid urbanization has always been accompanied by urban river pollution. In London in 1855, the English scientist and inventor Michael Faraday wrote to The Times after his passage across the river Thames: ‘The smell [of the river] was very bad, and common to the whole of the water; it was the same as that which now comes up from the gully-holes in the streets; the whole river was for the time a real sewer’ (Faraday 1855). More recently, many developing countries have experienced the problem of polluted urban rivers as well. River pollution's most visible manifestation is a change in color, usually to black, often accompanied by strong unpleasant odors. In China, after the first report of blackening and odorization of the Huangpu River in 1983 (Gu and Cai 1983), similar phenomena were observed in other urban rivers as well as in their tributaries throughout the whole country, e.g. the Suzhou River in Shanghai (Ying, Zhang and Wu 1997), the Pearl River Delta, in particular in Guangzhou (Luo 2001), and the Weigong River in Shenyang (Li, Zhang and Yu 2003). By the end of 2016, there were around 1880 identified black-odorous urban rivers in 295 Chinese cities, and 64% of those rivers were located in coastal areas of southern China (Zhu 2016). The Chinese government recently released a national plan for water pollution control, the ‘Action Plan for Prevention and Treatment of Water Pollution’, and set targets for cleaning up polluted urban rivers. Nevertheless, only 45% of the identified black-odorous urban rivers were under or had finished treatment at that time (Kong 2016). Better pollution control is an urgent need to address blackening and odorization of urban rivers. However, it is often unclear what the exact reasons for the observed phenomena are. To better allocate resources for effective pollution control, it is necessary to identify the sources of pollution. A thorough understanding of the bio-geochemical processes underlying formation of black-odorous rivers is the first step, not only to apply effective pollution control but also to monitor the success of these measures and make adjustments if necessary. Organic pollutants from untreated waste streams or other non-point sources, e.g. agricultural and urban storm water runoffs (McCoy et al.2015), along river banks are believed to trigger blackening and odorization of urban rivers (Zhou, Gibson and Foy 2000; Fang et al.2012; Zhu 2016). The common understanding of the process is that high organic loading quickly depletes dissolved oxygen, leading to anaerobic conditions. Then, anaerobic microorganisms degrade dissolved organics, such as carbohydrates, fatty acids and proteins, into smaller molecules including odorous organic acids and reduced sulfur compounds, e.g. H2S and organic sulfides. These small molecules may then further react with minerals in the water and sediment, and, mediated by microorganisms, form black precipitates (Stahl 1979; Ji et al.2016). Inorganic fertilizer pollutants, such as phosphorous and nitrogen, are involved in odorization of urban rivers as well. They, for example, accelerate growth of phototrophs, a phenomenon known as eutrophication. In summer 2007, an odorous tap water crisis occurred in Wuxi, China, in which odorous volatile sulfide compounds, including methyl thiols, dimethyl sulfide and dimethyl disulfide, were produced in the river from the decomposition of massive cyanobacterial blooms (Zhang et al.2010). While such events are well documented for seawater environments (Yan, Zhou and Zou 2002), freshwater blooms have been less monitored in China. For example, the notoriously cyanobacteria-infested Lake Taihu in China experienced major blooms about every 3 years between 1960 and 1996 with increasing magnitude and frequency in recent years due to massive fertilizer pollution (Chen et al.2003). In this review, we focus on the key mechanisms and compounds involved in blackening and odorization of urban rivers. Based on the most relevant bio-geochemical processes, we propose scenarios to describe the formation of black-odorous urban rivers. We describe microbial communities in polluted and pristine freshwater systems that catalyze these processes. Lastly, we discuss challenges and possible strategies to control blackening and odorization, and propose key questions to be addressed in future studies. ELEMENTS AND COMPOUNDS CONTRIBUTING TO BLACKENING AND ODORIZATION OF URBAN RIVERS Large quantities of anthropogenic pollutants, both organic and inorganic, destabilize urban river ecosystems. The composition and concentration of organic matter in water, soil and sediment varies (Table 1). Biorecalcitrant humus, which is dominating fully decomposed organic matter, accounts for ≥40% of total organic matter present in urban rivers (Thurman 1985). These humic substances are resistant to further microbial degradation, and form black chelates with metal ions (Davies, Ghabbour and Khairy 1998; Fiedler et al.2002). Table 1. Differences between organic matter in soil and surface water. Soil Surface water Soil type SOM content (%) Humus (%) Source DOC (mg/L) Humus (mg/L) Histosols >80 32–60 Sea water 0.2–2.0 0.06–0.6 Most mineral soils <5 <3 River 1.0–10 0.5–4.0 Tropical soils 2 0.8–1.2 Lake 1–50 0.5–40 Soil Surface water Soil type SOM content (%) Humus (%) Source DOC (mg/L) Humus (mg/L) Histosols >80 32–60 Sea water 0.2–2.0 0.06–0.6 Most mineral soils <5 <3 River 1.0–10 0.5–4.0 Tropical soils 2 0.8–1.2 Lake 1–50 0.5–40 DOC, dissolved organic carbon; SOM, soil organic matter. Sources: Thurman 1985; Stanley 2000; Juo and Franzluebbers 2003; He et al.2010; Zhang et al.2012; Osman 2013; Tfaily et al.2017. View Large The abundance of inorganic substances in urban river sediments is similar to that in the Earth's crust and soil (Table 2). Dominant metallic elements in river waters are iron, magnesium, aluminum and manganese, which originate from major clay minerals in sediments (Table 3; Abdullah et al.2014). Abundant metals in the Earth's crust such as Fe and Mn are major blackening ingredients in black-odorous urban rivers (Tables 2 and 3; Metzger et al.2014). Other major metallic elements, e.g. Al, Ca, Mg and Zn, are either of white color when forming minerals or their redox potentials are too low (≤−760 mV at standard conditions) for participation in natural redox processes. Sulfur, nitrogen and carbon are the three major non-metallic elements contributing to the stench of urban rivers through formation of volatile compounds, e.g. H2S, organic sulfides, NH3, amines and short chain fatty acids (Tables 2 and 3; Ginzburg et al.1999; Bentley and Chasteen 2004; Ebil, Dursun and Dentel 2014). In coastal areas, urban rivers are often tributaries of tidal rivers with high concentrations of sulfate and magnesium (Latha and Rao 2012). Additionally, metallic elements, e.g. Fe, Mn and Mg, are mobile between sediment and water phase, sometimes mediated by microorganisms (Rzepecki 2012). These exchange rates are accelerated by organic pollution of urban rivers (Odigie et al.2014). Table 2. The content of main elements in crust, soil, surface sediment and surface water. Elements Crust (%) Soil (%) Surface sediments (%) Surface water (ppm) O 46–50 49 Si 26–27 33 Al 7.5–8.3 7.1 6.72 0.72084 Fe 4.7–5.8 4 2.61 0.80041 Ca 3.39–5.2 1.5 1.2 K 2.3–2.64 1.4 2.46 Na 1.7–2.4 0.15 2.39 Mg 1.87–2.8 0.5 1.24 6.158 Ti 0.45–0.64 0.5 0.3186 Cl 0.13–0.19 0.01 P 0.09–0.12 0.08 0.05485 C 0.02–0.09 2 Mn 0.08–0.10 0.1 0.06239 0.01697 S 0.026–0.048 0.07 N 0.002–0.003 0.2 Cr 0.01–0.03 0.007 0.00997 0.00588 F 0.054–0.059 0.02 Ni 0.008–0.009 0.005 0.00829 0.00188 V 0.009–0.019 0.009 0.00547 Co 0.0018–0.0025 0.0008 0.00114 0.00045 Cu 0.005–0.006 0.003 0.0108 0.00626 Zn 0.007–0.009 0.0009 0.0388 0.010943 Pb 0.0012–0.0016 0.0035 0.00547 0.00807 As 0.00018–0.00022 0.0006 0.000885 0.003108 Br 0.00021–0.00025 0.001 Cd 0.000015–0.00002 3.5E-05 0.0000778 0.00007 Elements Crust (%) Soil (%) Surface sediments (%) Surface water (ppm) O 46–50 49 Si 26–27 33 Al 7.5–8.3 7.1 6.72 0.72084 Fe 4.7–5.8 4 2.61 0.80041 Ca 3.39–5.2 1.5 1.2 K 2.3–2.64 1.4 2.46 Na 1.7–2.4 0.15 2.39 Mg 1.87–2.8 0.5 1.24 6.158 Ti 0.45–0.64 0.5 0.3186 Cl 0.13–0.19 0.01 P 0.09–0.12 0.08 0.05485 C 0.02–0.09 2 Mn 0.08–0.10 0.1 0.06239 0.01697 S 0.026–0.048 0.07 N 0.002–0.003 0.2 Cr 0.01–0.03 0.007 0.00997 0.00588 F 0.054–0.059 0.02 Ni 0.008–0.009 0.005 0.00829 0.00188 V 0.009–0.019 0.009 0.00547 Co 0.0018–0.0025 0.0008 0.00114 0.00045 Cu 0.005–0.006 0.003 0.0108 0.00626 Zn 0.007–0.009 0.0009 0.0388 0.010943 Pb 0.0012–0.0016 0.0035 0.00547 0.00807 As 0.00018–0.00022 0.0006 0.000885 0.003108 Br 0.00021–0.00025 0.001 Cd 0.000015–0.00002 3.5E-05 0.0000778 0.00007 Sources: Gaillardet, Viers and Dupré 2003; Yang et al.2003; JeffersonLab 2007; Liu et al.2007; Landaud, Helinck and Bonnarme 2008; Viers, Dupré and Gaillardet 2009; Feng et al.2010; Lin et al.2012; Song et al.2013; Gao et al.2016; Song et al.2017. View Large Table 3. Major clay minerals composition and content (%) in river sediments. Minerals Pearl Pearl River Huanghe Changjiang Changjiang Molecular River estuary River River estuary formula Kaolinite 46 40 10 16 10 Al2Si2O5(OH)4 Clinochlore: (Mg5Al)(AlSi3)O10(OH)8 Chamosite: (Fe5Al)(AlSi3)O10(OH)8 Chlorite 25 28 16 12 26 Nimite: (Ni5Al)(AlSi3)O10(OH)8 Pennantite: (Mn,Al)6(Si,Al)4O10(OH)8 Illite 26 26 62 66 58 (K,H3O)(Al,Mg,Fe)2(Si,Al)4O10[(OH)2,(H2O) Montmorillonite: (Na,Ca)0.33(Al,Mg)2(Si4O10)(OH)2·nH2O Smectite <2 <6 <12 <6 3 Nontronite: Na0.3Fe2((Si,Al)4O10)(OH)2·nH2O Saponite: Ca0.25(Mg,Fe)3((Si,Al)4O10)(OH)2·nH2O Minor mineral <1 <1 NP NP <3 FeS2 (Pyrite) Minerals Pearl Pearl River Huanghe Changjiang Changjiang Molecular River estuary River River estuary formula Kaolinite 46 40 10 16 10 Al2Si2O5(OH)4 Clinochlore: (Mg5Al)(AlSi3)O10(OH)8 Chamosite: (Fe5Al)(AlSi3)O10(OH)8 Chlorite 25 28 16 12 26 Nimite: (Ni5Al)(AlSi3)O10(OH)8 Pennantite: (Mn,Al)6(Si,Al)4O10(OH)8 Illite 26 26 62 66 58 (K,H3O)(Al,Mg,Fe)2(Si,Al)4O10[(OH)2,(H2O) Montmorillonite: (Na,Ca)0.33(Al,Mg)2(Si4O10)(OH)2·nH2O Smectite <2 <6 <12 <6 3 Nontronite: Na0.3Fe2((Si,Al)4O10)(OH)2·nH2O Saponite: Ca0.25(Mg,Fe)3((Si,Al)4O10)(OH)2·nH2O Minor mineral <1 <1 NP NP <3 FeS2 (Pyrite) NP, not provided. Sources: Liu et al.2007; Wang et al.2006; Yang et al.2003. View Large BIO-GEOCHEMICAL TRANSFERS OF THE KEY ELEMENTS INVOLVED IN WATER BLACKENING AND ODORIZAITON Black color formation via metal precipitates Black matter in urban rivers comprises black metallic precipitates and precipitates of brown, green, or other colors that together form a dark color. In O2-depleted surface waters, metals precipitate with sulfide and stain the water black (Fig. 1; Table 4; Nealson and Little 1997; Metzger et al.2014). Common metals such as iron and nickel form black or dark sulfides. Iron, nickel and copper sulfides are the thermodynamically most favorable precipitates (Table 4). Stahl (1979) investigated a black water lake in Illinois and demonstrated that ferrous sulfide was responsible for the black color. Mixed minerals such as copper–iron sulfides have been observed as well, for example, in the Danube River Basin (Brankov, Milijašević and Milanović 2012). Copper and other heavy metal precipitates were also detected in the Pearl River Estuary, China (Fang, Li and Zhang 2005) as well as the Reno River watershed, Italy (Ferronato et al.2013). In reduced environments, Mn exists as soluble Mn2+, due to its low affinity for sulfur, and dose not precipitate (Nealson and Little 1997). Figure 1. View largeDownload slide The microbially mediated reduction of Fe/Mn-minerals in urban rivers. Figure 1. View largeDownload slide The microbially mediated reduction of Fe/Mn-minerals in urban rivers. Table 4. Thermodynamics of some black or dark metal mineral reactions. Net reaction ΔG°΄/M ΔG°΄/S (kJ mol−1) (kJ mol−1) Reductive environments SO42− + H3C–COO− + 3 H+ → HS− + 2 HCO3− + 3 H+ n/a −48 Fe2+ + HS− + H+ → FeSa + 2 H+ −231 −231 8 FeOOHb + 9 H3C–COO− + 8 SO42− + 25 H+ → 8 FeS + 18 HCO3− + 18 H+ + 12 H2O −93 −93 2 FeOOH + 3 HS− + 3 H+ → FeS + FeS2c + 4 H2O −74 −50 Fe3O4 + 4 HS− + 4 H+ → 2 FeS + FeS2 + 4 H2O −61 −46 FeS + S0 → FeS2 −60 −30 4 FeOOH + 6 HS− + 6 H+ → FeS2 + Fe3S4d + 8 H2O −57 −38 2 FeOOH + 3 HS− + 3 H+ → 2 FeS + S0 + 4 H2O −45 −30 Fe3O4e + 4 HS− + 4 H+ → Fe3S4 + 4 H2O −38 −28 9 FeS + 5 HS− + 5 H+ → 3 FeS2 + 2 Fe3S4 −2 −1 4 S0 + H3C–COO− + H+ + 4 H2O → 4 HS− + 2 HCO3− + 6 H+ n/a −2 24 FeOOHa + H3C–COO− + H+ → 8 Fe3O4 + 2 HCO3− + 2 H+ + 12 H2O −5 n/a 8 FeOOH + H3C–COO− + 17 H+ → 8 Fe2+ + 2 HCO3− + 2 H+ + 12 H2O 186 n/a Ni2+ + HS− + H+ → NiSf + 2 H+ −184 −184 Cu2+ + HS− + H+ → CuSg + 2 H+ −171 −171 CuS + S0 → CuS2h −33 −16 Pb2+ + HS− + H+ → PbSi + 2 H+ −126 −126 Zn2+ + HS− + H+ → ZnSj + 2 H+ −106 −106 Mn2+ + HS− + H+ → MnSk + 2 H+ −42 −42 MnS + S0 → MnS2l 167 167 Oxidative environments ΔG°΄/Fe ΔG°΄/ox (kJ mol−1) (kJ mol−1) 2 Cr2O3m + 3 O2 + 4 H2O → 4 HCrO4− + 4 H+ −1094 −1459 10 FeS + 6 NO3− + 6 H+ + 2 H2O → 10 FeOOH + 10 S0 + 3 N2 −250 −417 4 FeS + 3 O2 + 5 H2O → 4 FeOOH + 4 S0 + 3 H2O −270 −359 HS− + MnO2n + 3 H+ → S0 + Mn2+ + 2 H2O n/a −130 2 FeS + 3 MnO2 + 6 H+ → 2 FeOOH + 3 Mn2+ 2 S0 + 2 H2O −150 −100 2 FeS2 + 3 MnO2 + 6 H+ → 2 FeOOH + 3 Mn2+ + 4 S0 + 2 H2O −90 −60 Net reaction ΔG°΄/M ΔG°΄/S (kJ mol−1) (kJ mol−1) Reductive environments SO42− + H3C–COO− + 3 H+ → HS− + 2 HCO3− + 3 H+ n/a −48 Fe2+ + HS− + H+ → FeSa + 2 H+ −231 −231 8 FeOOHb + 9 H3C–COO− + 8 SO42− + 25 H+ → 8 FeS + 18 HCO3− + 18 H+ + 12 H2O −93 −93 2 FeOOH + 3 HS− + 3 H+ → FeS + FeS2c + 4 H2O −74 −50 Fe3O4 + 4 HS− + 4 H+ → 2 FeS + FeS2 + 4 H2O −61 −46 FeS + S0 → FeS2 −60 −30 4 FeOOH + 6 HS− + 6 H+ → FeS2 + Fe3S4d + 8 H2O −57 −38 2 FeOOH + 3 HS− + 3 H+ → 2 FeS + S0 + 4 H2O −45 −30 Fe3O4e + 4 HS− + 4 H+ → Fe3S4 + 4 H2O −38 −28 9 FeS + 5 HS− + 5 H+ → 3 FeS2 + 2 Fe3S4 −2 −1 4 S0 + H3C–COO− + H+ + 4 H2O → 4 HS− + 2 HCO3− + 6 H+ n/a −2 24 FeOOHa + H3C–COO− + H+ → 8 Fe3O4 + 2 HCO3− + 2 H+ + 12 H2O −5 n/a 8 FeOOH + H3C–COO− + 17 H+ → 8 Fe2+ + 2 HCO3− + 2 H+ + 12 H2O 186 n/a Ni2+ + HS− + H+ → NiSf + 2 H+ −184 −184 Cu2+ + HS− + H+ → CuSg + 2 H+ −171 −171 CuS + S0 → CuS2h −33 −16 Pb2+ + HS− + H+ → PbSi + 2 H+ −126 −126 Zn2+ + HS− + H+ → ZnSj + 2 H+ −106 −106 Mn2+ + HS− + H+ → MnSk + 2 H+ −42 −42 MnS + S0 → MnS2l 167 167 Oxidative environments ΔG°΄/Fe ΔG°΄/ox (kJ mol−1) (kJ mol−1) 2 Cr2O3m + 3 O2 + 4 H2O → 4 HCrO4− + 4 H+ −1094 −1459 10 FeS + 6 NO3− + 6 H+ + 2 H2O → 10 FeOOH + 10 S0 + 3 N2 −250 −417 4 FeS + 3 O2 + 5 H2O → 4 FeOOH + 4 S0 + 3 H2O −270 −359 HS− + MnO2n + 3 H+ → S0 + Mn2+ + 2 H2O n/a −130 2 FeS + 3 MnO2 + 6 H+ → 2 FeOOH + 3 Mn2+ 2 S0 + 2 H2O −150 −100 2 FeS2 + 3 MnO2 + 6 H+ → 2 FeOOH + 3 Mn2+ + 4 S0 + 2 H2O −90 −60 Black or dark minerals: airon sulfide, bgoethite, cpyrite, dgreigite, emagnetite, fmillerite, gcovellite, hα-chalkosite, ilead sulfide, jsphalerite (disulfide not known for Zn and Pb), kalabandite (pink, orange or green), lhauerite, meskolaite, npyrolusite (light grey). M, metal; n/a, not applicable; ox. oxidant. View Large While iron sulfide formation is spontaneous, microorganisms such as Geobacter, Geothrix, Rhodoferax and Shewanella can harvest the released energy for their cell growth (Fig. 1; Lovley 1991). Thermodynamically, formation of FeS is favored followed by FeS2 and Fe3S4 (Table 4). Greigite (Fe3S4) is formed in excess of sulfide. Elemental sulfur (S0) and polysulfide (Sn2−) formation are thought to be the intermediate steps leading to pyrite and greigite (Table 4; Rickard 1975; Luther 1991). Similar to bio-geochemical transfers in marine sediments, the FeS and FeS2 as well as other metals play central roles in the sulfur cycle in urban rivers (Schippers and Jørgensen 2002). That is, metals and especially abundant iron, are reduced by organic pollutants, such as volatile fatty acids (such as acetic, butyric and propionic acids), or other reducing equivalents (Table 4). If iron then again enters oxidizing zones, for example by currents or shift of oxic zones, it can be re-oxidized by dissolved oxygen, nitrate, or manganese oxides. Iron oxides, such as goethite, can also be reduced biologically. Humic substances enhance the bioavailability of insoluble Fe(III) oxides as electron acceptors and therefore improve the thermodynamics of biological iron reduction (Lovley et al.1996, 1998). Quinone moieties in humic substances serve as electron shuttles in Fe(III)-respiring microorganisms, e.g. Ferribacterium limneticum and Geobacter metallireducens, accelerating the rate of both Fe(III) oxide reduction in river sediments and contaminant oxidation coupled to Fe(III) reduction (Lovley et al.1996; Finneran and Lovley 2001; Nevin and Lovley 2000). Other iron reducers such as Shewanella oneidensis (Venkateswaran et al.1999), Paludibaculum fermentans (Kulichevskaya et al.2014) and Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans (Sanford, Cole and Tiedje 2002) are able to utilize a number of different electron donors including sugars and long chain fatty acids. The broad variety of electron acceptors and donors used by iron reducers makes these microorganisms ubiquitous in freshwater sediments. In sediments, pyrite (FeS2) is oxidized abiotically at mineral interfaces, for example between FeS2 and MnO2 (Table 4; Schippers and Jørgensen 2002). Immediate products of this oxidation are thiosulfate and polythionates, which can be further oxidized to sulfate by manganese-reducing bacteria (Jørgensen and Nelson 2004). Additionally, Fe(II) and Mn(II) were released from sediment pore waters to form black oxides in anoxic–oxic water interface zone of the black rivers (Atkinson et al.2007). Small amounts of dissolved ferrous iron released from FeS2 in sediments can be re-oxidized by oxygen, nitrate and MnO2 and precipitated as black magnetite in river beds. After reentry in oxic zones or through mediation, reduced Mn(II) is recycled to MnO2 via microbial oxidation in the presence of, even trace amounts of, O2 or nitrate in surface waters (Boogerd and de Vrind 1987; Marcus et al.2017). Nitrate has therefore been suggested as a cost-effective remediation method for black urban rivers (He et al.2017). Odorous volatile compounds Sulfur compounds Odorous compounds in urban rivers are volatile organic and inorganic compounds. Volatile sulfur compounds generated from microbial sulfate reduction or degradation of sulfur-containing organic matter normally have an unpleasant odor, including that of inorganic H2S and organic sulfides (Kadota and Ishida 2003). Sources of such reduced sulfur compounds vary. River deltas discharging into oceans often experience seawater influx due to tidal activity. Therefore, sulfide, as a result of microbial sulfate reduction, is detected in significant amounts in urban rivers connecting to major deltas in coastal areas, particularly in the Pearl River estuary where 3 mM sulfide in the sediment was reported as a result of sulfate reduction (Fang et al.2005). Most sulfide in estuaries is produced by sulfate reducing microorganisms using dissimilatory sulfate reduction for respiration. Sulfate reducing microorganisms are broadly dispersed across the prokaryotic phylogenetic tree but are often found among δ-Proteobacteria and Firmicutes as well as Archaea (Zhou et al.2011). In addition to the production of odorous H2S, sulfate reduction may eventually lead to the formation of black iron sulfide species even with trace amounts of iron in the water and sediment (Wu et al.2016). Another source of sulfide in urban rivers is organic sulfur (Giordano et al.2005). It enters the sulfur cycle via assimilatory sulfate reduction (Fig. 2). The amount of sulfur in domestic waste streams or other anthropogenic sources, however, is negligible compared with the massive cyanobacterial blooms in the surface waters (Zhang et al.2010). CO2-fixing cyanobacteria frequently are the main source of organic matter in surface waters. They assimilate sulfur via cysteine/methionine biosynthetic pathways (Fig. 2). This organic sulfur is subsequently released in the form of volatile organic sulfur compounds, which include thiols and thioethers in methylated sulfide species, e.g. methyl sulfide, dimethyl sulfide and dimethyl disulfide, as byproducts—all of which are characterized by their notoriously bad smell (Bentley and Chasteen 2004). Figure 2. View largeDownload slide Methionine biosynthesis (top) and degradation (bottom) proceed via cysteine. The biosynthetic pathway requires ATP for sulfate reduction to sulfide, producing the intermediate 3΄-phosphoadenosine-5΄-phosphosulfate (PAPS). Together with serine, sulfide then forms cysteine and ultimately methionine. Under anaerobic conditions, methionine is degraded to taurine, CO2 and sulfide in exchange for sulfite. Figure 2. View largeDownload slide Methionine biosynthesis (top) and degradation (bottom) proceed via cysteine. The biosynthetic pathway requires ATP for sulfate reduction to sulfide, producing the intermediate 3΄-phosphoadenosine-5΄-phosphosulfate (PAPS). Together with serine, sulfide then forms cysteine and ultimately methionine. Under anaerobic conditions, methionine is degraded to taurine, CO2 and sulfide in exchange for sulfite. Nitrogen and organic carbon compounds Nitrogen compounds are the largest group of malodorous compounds generated by proteolytic microorganisms, and their smells range from that of ammonia to the typical smell of corpse decomposition (Wang et al.2017). Microbiogenic malodorous nitrogen compounds include organic amines such as cadaverine (1,5-pentanediamine) and putrescine (1,4-butanediamine). Cadaverine is produced via decarboxylation of lysine, whereas putrescine is a product of degradation of ornithine, an essential building block of bacterial cell walls (Wunderlichová et al.2014; Ma et al.2017). Other abundant malodorous nitrogen compounds are volatile alkylated amines of characteristic fishy smell, which is sensed even in trace amounts. These compounds comprise alkylated amines, such as methylamine, dimethylamine, trimethylamine, ethaneamine, propaneamine and butaneamine (Ge et al.2011). Methylamines are degradation products of N-methylated amino acids, with glycine, betaine, choline, trimethylamine and carnitine as their natural precursors in biomass, which, in turn, is introduced into urban rivers via wastewater or algal blooms (Ikawa and Taylor 1973). All organisms are able to hydrolyze proteins using proteases as this is an essential part of their metabolism. Cell internal proteolysis is necessary in every organism, for example to tune its enzymatic machinery to novel environmental conditions or to control vital cell functions. Microorganisms specifically feeding on peptides can be isolated using casamino acids and trypticase peptone media, and often yield strains closely related to Clostridium species when grown anaerobically. Such proteolytic microorganisms are ubiquitous in anaerobic and aerobic environments alike. Examples of anaerobic environments are rumens (Blackburn and Hobson 1962), anaerobic digesters (Abendroth et al.2015), peat bogs (Juottonen et al.2005) and rice paddies (Weber et al.2001). Typical aerobic environments are many processed food products such as cabbage (Borla, Davidovich and Roura 2010) and dairy products (Frazier and Rupp 1931). Despite the presence of proteolytic microorganisms, none of the mentioned environments are known for their obnoxious smell. The reason is that protein concentrations are either relatively low or, in the case of food products, aerobic conditions prevail. When oxygen is absent, alkylated amines cannot be further oxidized and serve as substrates for sulfate reducers or methanogens (Lovley and Klug 1983). However, since alkylated amines are gaseous or at least volatile, they often escape before slow growing anaerobic microorganisms are able to degrade them, causing the typical smell in surface waters. Odorous organic compounds without S and N elements are mostly VFAs, which are generated by anaerobic fermentation of organic pollutants in the waste streams or of decomposed compounds produced by algal blooms (Verstraete et al.1996; Pham et al.2012). VFAs in urban rivers play critical roles in coupling organic carbon compounds with iron and sulfur cycles in the surface water (Fig. 4). For example, when sulfate is present, VFAs can be further used as electron donors by sulfate reducing microorganisms and produce malodorous sulfide (Hao et al.2009). Figure 3. View largeDownload slide Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA with Bray–Curtis distance matrices) of six surface-water sediment samples collected from three different geographic areas, i.e. Pearl River Delta, Yangtze River Delta and Dongting area. This figure is plotted with published 16S rRNA gene-sequencing data (Wang et al2012; Liu et al2014; He et al2017; Huang et al2017). The trophic states of the six surface waters are: eutrophic for Taihu Lake and Chebei River (black-odorous river); mesotrophic for Dongting Lake, Huangda Lake and Pearl River; and oligotrophic for Liuxi Reservoir. Figure 3. View largeDownload slide Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA with Bray–Curtis distance matrices) of six surface-water sediment samples collected from three different geographic areas, i.e. Pearl River Delta, Yangtze River Delta and Dongting area. This figure is plotted with published 16S rRNA gene-sequencing data (Wang et al2012; Liu et al2014; He et al2017; Huang et al2017). The trophic states of the six surface waters are: eutrophic for Taihu Lake and Chebei River (black-odorous river); mesotrophic for Dongting Lake, Huangda Lake and Pearl River; and oligotrophic for Liuxi Reservoir. MICROBIAL ECOLOGY OF PRISTINE AND POLLUTED FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENTS Urban river pollution affects microbial communities in water and sediments with measurable effects in the short (Schöll and Szövényi 2011) and long term (Ibekwe, Ma and Murinda 2016; Lu, Chen and Zheng 2017). This makes microbial community analysis an additional monitoring tool for water quality (Drury, Rosi-Marshall and Kelly 2013; García-Armisen et al.2014; Li, Sharp and Drewes 2016; Xie et al.2016; Köchling et al.2017). Diversity (Drury, Rosi-Marshall and Kelly 2013; Staley et al.2013), richness (Lin et al.2014) and variability (Lu, Chen and Zheng 2017) of microbial communities have been affected by anthropogenic pollutants. As expected, coliform growth is correlated with fecal anthropogenic contamination, for example in large rivers such as the Danube (Hoch et al.1996; Kirschner et al.2009) and the Mississippi (Staley et al.2013), as well as smaller rivers such as the Jaboatão River in Brazil (Köchling et al.2017), the Reno River in Italy (Ferronato et al.2013) and small creeks of a California watershed (Ibekwe, Ma and Murinda 2016). A clear impact of treated wastewater on community composition and metabolism was reported for the Taif River in Saudi Arabia, where pristine samples showed a higher representation of carbohydrate metabolic genes along with fatty acid and amino acid anabolic genes as opposed to samples impacted by wastewater (Li, Sharp and Drewes 2016). The latter were enriched in genes associated with nitrogen and sulfur metabolism, as would be expected in nutrient rich environments. Inverse metabolic patterns were reported for river sediments in China where energy-, carbohydrate- and amino acid-related genes were enriched or equal to pristine control sediments (Lu, Chen and Zheng 2017). Algal growth is often considered to be linked to anthropogenic contamination in freshwater systems such as Taihu Lake in China (Huang et al.2017) or the Zenne River in Belgium (García-Armisen et al.2014). However, the mechanisms by which pollution and algal growth are connected are not always clear. For example, Huang et al. (2017) found that phosphate as well as organic matter concentration were correlated with cyanobacterial growth in the Taihu Lake, whereas in the Danube River, Kirschner et al. (2009) identified only a link to organic matter but not any other of the factors investigated, such as phosphate, nitrogen and temperature. This suggests that cyanobacteria live heterotrophically or that low bioavailability of inorganic nutrients are responsible for algal blooms. Despite the ongoing DNA sequencing revolution, it is not clear which factors shape river sediment communities. Some recent attempts indicate that, indeed, organic matter released into urban rivers by sewage streams promotes growth of certain microbial lineages such as Acinetobacter, Flaviobacterium, Thauera and Rhodococcus in the Zenne River flowing through the Brussels metropolitan area (García-Armisen et al.2014). A similar correlation between organic matter and Cyanobacteria was linked to fecal coliforms and Enterococci in the Danube (Kirschner et al.2009). The dependence of fecal coliforms on environmental factors, however, was stronger in the water column than in the sediments studied in selected creeks of a southern California watershed (Ibekwe, Ma and Murinda 2016). In the Rhône River prodelta, microbial variation could be explained by organic matter as well (Fagervold, et al.2014). In addition to organic matter, Ji et al. (2016) found that iron and sulfate concentrations as well as pH were associated with methanogenic networks identified in Amazonian lake sediments. The pioneering works of Zwart et al. (2002) and Newton et al. (2011) identified an appreciable bacterial diversity in freshwater systems showing that river and lake communities are similar. In addition, our own comparison of published 16S rRNA gene-sequencing data of three Chinese lakes, two rivers and one reservoir from three distant areas shows that geographical location best explained the differences between the investigated freshwater environments (Fig. 3). Though microbial populations of contaminated and pristine sites of the same region cluster closely, communities still show some difference. Proteobacteria are the largest phylum in the prokaryotic tree of life and are therefore also highly abundant in river sediments—polluted or not. Nearly all river and lake sediments surveyed here harbored α-, β- and γ-Proteobacteria. The most prominent representative of freshwater α-Proteobacteria is the SAR11 clade (Pelagibacter; Salcher et al.2011; Savio et al.2015). Also Bacteroidetes were found in nearly all freshwater sediments. Together, these four groups cover 40% of all cultured prokaryotic species, making their dominance in freshwater sediments only natural. Consequently, microbial communities in freshwater sediments are often very similar at the phylum level (Ji et al.2016). Nonetheless, a study screening 68 publications of lake microbial communities using only high quality Sanger-sequencing data reported a large heterogeneity at lower taxonomic levels, termed tribes (Newton et al.2011). This finding was confirmed for Mississippi River sediments where only 12% of the identified operational taxonomic units (>97% sequence identity) were shared across all sites (Staley et al.2013). It is hence the less abundant groups, such as Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Chloroflexi, Planctomycetes, Gemmatimonadetes and Archaea, or tribes that may act as distinctive indicators for metabolic processes. Many such tribes are uncultured representatives of freshwater environments and do not match with Linnaean taxonomic boundaries. While broad surveys of our drinking water resources need to be continued, it remains unclear how under-represented parts of microbial communities adapt to pollution. Indeed, a recent metagenomic survey of a wastewater impacted river showed that small community factions are major hubs in microbial assemblages (Li, Sharp and Drewes 2016). This is an observation that has also been made in the pristine Lake Cadagno, Switzerland, where 0.3% of the cells in the lake were responsible for 40% of the substrate turnover (Musat et al.2008). In conclusion, more studies on natural environments are necessary to understand the above mentioned discrepancies and to establish a baseline for future research on pollution affected environments. A SCENARIO OF THE BIO-GEOCHEMICAL PROCESS IN BLACKENING AND ODORIZAITON OF URBAN RIVERS In the scenario depicted in Fig. 4, organic matter originates either directly from anthropogenic sources, e.g. waste streams and other non-point source pollution, or from decomposition of cyanobacteria biomass. These are the main suspects in generating odors by production of volatile (organic) sulfides, odorous amines and VFAs (Van Neste et al.1987; Ginzburg et al.1998; Hu et al.2007; Zhang et al.2010). Organic matter is also the major source of reducing equivalents for the reduction of sulfate and iron to produce black minerals such as iron sulfides, which link the sulfur and iron cycles in urban rivers (Fig. 4; Berner et al.1985; Lovley 1987). Therefore, input of organic matter into urban rivers is likely the key factor for triggering water blackening and odorization. Sulfur input from sediment, seawater, or decomposing algal biomass is directly involved in the formation of black- and odorous-matter in urban rivers, e.g. via formation of sulfide species such as H2S and iron sulfides. Alkylated sulfides are often byproducts of cyanobacterial metabolism and biomass degradation and their volatility makes them strong odorous constituents of some urban rivers’ stench. Sulfate reduction by diverse sulfate reducing microorganisms dominates in sediments because their redox potential confers growth advantages to these microorganisms over their competitors. For example, the standard redox potential of sulfate reduction (−217 mV) is slightly more positive than that of hydrogenotropic methanogenic process (−240 mV). This and the higher energy gain compared with iron reduction suggest that sulfur is the link between the different element cycles as shown for Black Sea sediments (Siegert et al.2013). Figure 4. View largeDownload slide Scenarios describing bio-geochemical transfers of major black and odorous elements/compounds in urban rivers. In the process of organic matter degradation, odors result from production of volatile organic sulfur compounds, methylamines and VFAs, which escape into the atmosphere. In addition, organic matter supplies reducing power for SO42− and Fe(III) to form FeSx. The processes for black/odorous compounds are shown with solid lines, and others with dotted lines. DMS, dimethyl sulfide; VFAs, volatile organic sulfur compounds; VOSCs, volatile organic sulfur compounds. Figure 4. View largeDownload slide Scenarios describing bio-geochemical transfers of major black and odorous elements/compounds in urban rivers. In the process of organic matter degradation, odors result from production of volatile organic sulfur compounds, methylamines and VFAs, which escape into the atmosphere. In addition, organic matter supplies reducing power for SO42− and Fe(III) to form FeSx. The processes for black/odorous compounds are shown with solid lines, and others with dotted lines. DMS, dimethyl sulfide; VFAs, volatile organic sulfur compounds; VOSCs, volatile organic sulfur compounds. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES The blackening and odorization of urban rivers is a complex bio-geochemical process involving five key elements, i.e. Fe, Mn, S, N and C. Outstanding issues include the following. (i) While we propose several mechanisms that contribute to blackening and odorization of urban rivers such as organic matter degradation and metal precipitation, there is no evidence yet that these are indeed the driving factors. In the past, measures to counter river pollution were taken, such as widespread treatment of industrial wastewater in the Pearl River Delta and sediment removal, yet they only mitigated the problem for a short time. Evidence for our hypothesized mechanisms needs to be collected in order to take targeted action. Gathering this evidence requires application of standard tests to assess water quality (listed in Table 5) along with novel molecular techniques and may involve the development of new methods that are more efficient. As shown in this review, the suspected blackening elements (metal sulfides) and three odor-forming elements (S, N and C) should be first targets for water quality analysis investigating blackening and odor formation in the urban rivers. Table 5. Routine methods for surface water quality assessment. Analyte Method References Dissolved inorganic carbon Spectrophotometry/potentiometry/conductimetry Oshima et al.2001; Carlson 1978; Linares et al.1989 Dissolved organic carbon Chemical oxidation Sharp 1973 Ultraviolet oxidation Beattie et al.1961; Armstrong et al.1966 High-temperature combustion Sharp 1973; Salonen 1979 Chemical oxygen demand Dichromate oxidation method Moore et al.1949; Jirka and Carter 1975 Potassium permanganate oxidation method Korenaga 1980 Metal content (Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, etc.) Spectroscopic analysis method (inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry) Houk et al. 1989 Total dissolved nitrogen Alkaline persulfate digestion Solorzano and Sharp 1980 High temperature oxidation Suzuki et al.1985 Dissolved inorganic nitrogen Phenol hypochlorite reaction method (NH3/NH4+) Bolleter et al.1961 Nessler's reagent spectrophotometry (NH3/NH4+) Vanselow 1940; Leonard 1963 Ion chromatography (NO2−, NO3−) Gjerde et al.1979 Colorimetry (NO2−) APHA 1998 Ultraviolet spectrophotometry (NO3−) Hoather and Rackham 1959 Dissolved organic nitrogen High-temperature catalytic oxidation Badr et al.2003 Dissolved and precipitated sulfides CuS colloidal solution method Cord-Ruwisch 1985 Dissolved sulfate Turbidimetry Tabatabai 1974 Volatile organic sulfur compounds Chromatography analysis method (gas chromatography–sulfur chemiluminescence detection) Sun et al.2014 Chromatography analysis method (gas chromatography–mass spectrometry) Van Langenhove et al.1985 Element content (C, H, N, S) Elemental analysis Kirsten 1971; Fadeeva et al.2008 Analyte Method References Dissolved inorganic carbon Spectrophotometry/potentiometry/conductimetry Oshima et al.2001; Carlson 1978; Linares et al.1989 Dissolved organic carbon Chemical oxidation Sharp 1973 Ultraviolet oxidation Beattie et al.1961; Armstrong et al.1966 High-temperature combustion Sharp 1973; Salonen 1979 Chemical oxygen demand Dichromate oxidation method Moore et al.1949; Jirka and Carter 1975 Potassium permanganate oxidation method Korenaga 1980 Metal content (Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, etc.) Spectroscopic analysis method (inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry) Houk et al. 1989 Total dissolved nitrogen Alkaline persulfate digestion Solorzano and Sharp 1980 High temperature oxidation Suzuki et al.1985 Dissolved inorganic nitrogen Phenol hypochlorite reaction method (NH3/NH4+) Bolleter et al.1961 Nessler's reagent spectrophotometry (NH3/NH4+) Vanselow 1940; Leonard 1963 Ion chromatography (NO2−, NO3−) Gjerde et al.1979 Colorimetry (NO2−) APHA 1998 Ultraviolet spectrophotometry (NO3−) Hoather and Rackham 1959 Dissolved organic nitrogen High-temperature catalytic oxidation Badr et al.2003 Dissolved and precipitated sulfides CuS colloidal solution method Cord-Ruwisch 1985 Dissolved sulfate Turbidimetry Tabatabai 1974 Volatile organic sulfur compounds Chromatography analysis method (gas chromatography–sulfur chemiluminescence detection) Sun et al.2014 Chromatography analysis method (gas chromatography–mass spectrometry) Van Langenhove et al.1985 Element content (C, H, N, S) Elemental analysis Kirsten 1971; Fadeeva et al.2008 View Large (ii) What, if any, are the core microbial communities, taxonomically and physiologically, mediating bio-geochemical transfers of the key elements in black-odorous urban rivers? Despite the progress in studies of metabolism and element cycles in surface waters, many puzzles remain, for example, the discrepancy in some reports and our own investigations showing that pollution sometimes does not affect microbial communities. There is a need for better understanding of the core communities coupling all these element cycles in black-odorous urban rivers. Current meta-omic technologies may help to provide in-depth insights. (iii) What is the role of minor elements, e.g. Cu and Zn, in the blackening and odorization of urban rivers? Hitherto, very few studies have investigated their contribution to blackening and odorization in surface waters. Whether these trace elements play critical roles in connecting the Fe, Mn, S, N and C cycles warrants future investigation. (iv) New water quality standards to address blackening and odorous surface waters need to be developed in China. Current guidelines are insufficient, mostly because it is not clear what the reasons for blackening and odorization are. Defining baselines will be essential to develop standards. Understanding the pathways involved in blackening and malodor-generating metabolism is key to controlling these processes and developing environmentally friendly microbial technologies. For example, scaling bio-electrochemical technologies to use polluted rivers for power production can be an environmentally friendly alternative to current treatment strategies (Ewing et al.2014). Also, microbial inhibitors may be used to block microbial participation in Fe, Mn, S, N and C cycles. FUNDING This study was supported by the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51638005). Conflict of interest. None declared. REFERENCES Abdullah JA, Michel H, Funel GB et al. Distribution and baseline values of trace elements in the sediment of Var River catchment. Environ Monit Assess 2014; 186: 8175– 89. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Abendroth C, Vilanova C, Günther T et al. Eubacteria and archaea communities in seven mesophile anaerobic digester plants in Germany. Biotechnol Biofuels 2015; 8: 87. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed APHA. APHA Standard Method 4500—NO2−. B. In: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater , 20th edn. Washington: American Public Health Association, 1998. Armstrong FA, Williams PM, Strickland JD et al. Photo-oxidation of organic matter in sea water by ultra-violet radiation, analytical and other applications. Nature 1966; 211: 481– 3. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Atkinson CA, Jolley DF, Simpson SL et al. Effect of overlying water pH, dissolved oxygen, salinity and sediment disturbances on metal release and sequestration from metal contaminated marine sediments. Chemosphere 2007; 69: 1428– 37. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Badr EA, Achterberg EP, Tappin AD et al. Determination of dissolved organic nitrogen in natural waters using high-temperature catalytic oxidation. Trends Anal Chem 2003; 22: 819– 27. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Beattie J, Bricker CE, Garvin D et al. Photolytic determination of trace amounts of organic material in water. Anal Chem 1961; 33: 1890– 2. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Bentley R, Chasteen TG. Environmental VOSCs—formation and degradation of dimethyl sulfide, methanethiol and related materials. Chemosphere 2004; 55: 291– 317. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Berner RA, De Leeuw JW, Spiro B et al. Sulphate reduction, organic matter decomposition and pyrite formation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 1985; 1531: 25– 38 Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Blackburn TH, Hobson PN. Further studies on the isolation of proteolytic bacteria from the sheep rumen. Microbiology 1962; 29: 69– 81. Bolleter WT, Bushman CJ, Tidwell PW et al. Spectrophotometric determination of ammonia as indophenol. Anal Chem 1961; 33: 592– 4. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Boogerd FC, De Vrind JP. Manganese oxidation by Leptothrix discophora. J Bacteriol 1987; 169: 489– 94. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Borla OP, Davidovich LA, Roura SI. Isolation and characterization of proteolytic microorganisms from fresh and fermented cabbage. Food Sci Technol 2010; 43: 298– 301. Brankov J, Milijašević D, Milanović A. The asessment of the surface water quality using the water pollution index: a case study of the Timok River (the Danube River Basin), Serbia. Arch Environ Prot 2012; 38: 49– 61. Carlson RM. Automated separation and conductimetric determination of ammonia and dissolved carbon dioxide. Anal Chem 1978; 50: 1528– 31. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Chen Y, Qin B, Teubner K et al. Long-term dynamics of phytoplankton assemblages: Microcystis-domination in Lake Taihu, a large shallow lake in China. J Plankton Res 2003; 25: 445– 53. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Cord-Ruwisch R. A quick method for the determination of dissolved and precipitated sulfides in cultures of sulfate-reducing bacteria. J Microbiol Methods 1985; 4: 33– 36. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Davies G, Ghabbour EA, Khairy KA. Humic Substances Structures, Properties and Uses. Roy Soc Chem 1998; 4: 165– 172. David RL, ed., CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 89th edition (internet version 2009), CRC Press/Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL. Drury B, Rosi-Marshall E, Kelly JJ. Wastewater treatment effluent reduces the abundance and diversity of benthic bacterial communities in urban and suburban rivers. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013; 79: 1897– 905. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Ebil MT, Dursun D, Dentel SK. Enhancement of odor removal and dewaterability of anaerobically digested sludge by protease addition. J Residuals Sci Tech 2014; 11: 55– 64. Ewing T, Ha PT, Babauta JT et al. Scale-up of sediment microbial fuel cells. J Power Sources 2014; 272: 311– 9. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Fadeeva VP, Tikhova VD, Nikulicheva ON et al. Elemental analysis of organic compounds with the use of automated CHNS analyzers. J Anal Chem 2008; 63: 1094– 106. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Fagervold SK, Bourgeois S, Pruski AM et al. River organic matter shapes microbial communities in the sediment of the Rhone prodelta. ISME J 2014; 8: 2327– 38. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Fang JJ, Yang N, Cen DY et al. Odor compounds from different sources of landfill: characterization and source identification. Waste Manage 2012; 32: 1401– 10. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Fang T, Li X, Zhang G. Acid volatile sulfide and simultaneously extracted metals in the sediment cores of the Pearl River Estuary, South China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2005; 61: 420– 31. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Faraday M. Observations on the filth on the Thames. The Times 1855. Feng JL, Wang GL, Sun JH et al. Metals in water and surface sediments from Henan reaches of the Yellow River, China. Sci China Chem 2010; 53: 1217– 24. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Ferronato C, Modesto M, Stefanini I et al. Chemical and microbiological parameters in fresh water and sediments to evaluate the pollution risk in the Reno River watershed (North Italy). J Water Resour Prot 2013; 5: 458– 68. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Fiedler S, Jungkunst HF, Jahn R et al. Linking soil classification and soil dynamics-pedological and ecological perspectives. J Soil Sci Plant Nut 2002; 165: 517– 29. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Finneran KT, Lovley DR. Anaerobic degradation of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) and tert-butyl alcohol (TBA). Environ Sci Technol 2001; 35: 1785– 90. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Frazier WC, Rupp P. Studies on the proteolytic bacteria of milk: V. Action of proteolytic bacteria on milk serum. J Bacteriol 1931; 21: 263. Google Scholar PubMed Gaillardet J, Viers J, Dupré B. Trace elements in river waters. In: Drever, JI (ed). Surface and Ground Water, Weathering, and Soils . Treatise on Geochemistry, Vol. 5. Oxford: Elsevier-Pergamon, 2003, 225– 272. Gao L, Wang Z, Shan J et al. Distribution characteristics and sources of trace metals in sediment cores from a trans-boundary watercourse: An example from the Shima River, Pearl River Delta. Ecotox Environ Safe 2016; 134: 186– 95. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS García-Armisen T, Inceoglu O, Ouattara NK et al. Seasonal variations and resilience of bacterial communities in a sewage polluted urban river. PLoS One 2014; 9: e92579. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Ge X, Wexler AS, Clegg SL et al. Atmospheric amines – Part II. Thermodynamic properties and gas/particle partitioning. Atmos Environ 2011; 45: 561– 77. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Ginzburg B, Chalifa I, Gun J et al. DMS formation by dimethylsulfoniopropionate route in freshwater. Environ Sci Technol 1998; 32: 2130– 6. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Ginzburg B, Dor I, Chalifa I et al. Formation of dimethyloligosulfides in Lake Kinneret: Biogenic formation of inorganic oligosulfide intermediates under oxic conditions. Environ Sci Technol 1999; 33: 571– 9. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Giordano M, Norici A, Hell R et al. Sulfur and phytoplankton: acquisition, metabolism and impact on the environment. New Phytol 2005; 166: 371– 82. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Gjerde DT, Fritz JS, Schmuckler G et al. Anion chromatography with low-conductivity eluents. J Chromatogr A 1979; 186: 509– 19. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Gu GW, Cai BT. Preliminary forecast of black-odor trends in Huangpu Creek. Shanghai Environ Sci 1983; 2: 24– 26. Hao OJ, Chen JM, Huang L et al. Sulfate-reducing bacteria. Crit Rev Env Sci Tec 2009; 26: 155– 87. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS He B, Dai M, Huang W et al. Sources and accumulation of organic carbon in the Pearl River Estuary surface sediment as indicated by elemental, stable carbon isotopic, and carbohydrate compositions. Biogeosciences 2010; 7: 3343– 62. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS He Z, Long X, Li L et al. Temperature response of sulfide/ferrous oxidation and microbial community in anoxic sediments treated with calcium nitrate addition. J Environ Manage 2017; 191: 209– 18. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Hoather RC, Rackham RF. Oxidised nitrogen in waters and sewage effluents observed by ultra-violet spectrophotometry. Analyst 1959; 84: 548– 51. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Hoch B, Berger B, Kavka G et al. Influence of wastewater treatment on the microbial ecology of a large, temperate river system − the Danube River. Hydrobiologia 1996; 321: 205– 18. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Houk RS, Thompson JJ. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev 1988; 7: 425– 61. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Hu H, Mylon SE, Benoit G et al. Volatile organic sulfur compounds in a stratified lake. Chemosphere 2007; 67: 911– 9. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Huang W, Chen X, Jiang X et al. Characterization of sediment bacterial communities in plain lakes with different trophic statuses. Microbiologyopen 2017; 6: e00503. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Ibekwe AM, Ma J, Murinda SE. Bacterial community composition and structure in an Urban River impacted by different pollutant sources. Sci Total Environ 2016; 566–567: 1176– 85. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Ikawa M, Taylor RF. Choline and Related Substances in Algae . New York: Academic Press, 1973. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS JeffersonLab. It's Elemental — The Periodic Table of Elements. 2007. http://education.jlab.org/itselemental/index.html (15 October 2017, date last accessed). Ji Y, Angel R, Klose M et al. Structure and function of methanogenic microbial communities in sediments of Amazonian lakes with different water types. Environ Microbiol 2016; 18: 5082– 100. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Jirka AM, Carter MJ. Micro semi-automated analysis of surface and wastewaters for chemical oxygen demand. Anal Chem 1975; 47: 1397– 402. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Jørgensen BB, Nelson DC. Sulfide oxidation in marine sediments: geochemistry meets microbiology. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 2004; 379: 63– 81. Juo ASR, Franzluebbers K. Tropical Soils: Properties and Management for Sustainable Agriculture . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Juottonen H, Galand PE, Tuittila ES et al. Methanogen communities and Bacteria along an ecohydrological gradient in a northern raised bog complex. Environ Microbiol 2005; 7: 1547– 57. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Kadota AH, Ishida Y. Production of volatile sulfur compounds by microorganisms. Annu Rev Microbiol 2003; 26: 127– 38. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Kirschner AKT, Kavka GG, Velimirov B et al. Microbiological water quality along the Danube River: Integrating data from two whole-river surveys and a transnational monitoring network. Water Res 2009; 43: 3673– 84. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Kirsten WJ. Ultramicro determination of carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen with a modified Walisch-Technicon Analyzer. Microchem J 1971; 16: 610– 25. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Köchling T, Sanz JL, Galdino L et al. Impact of pollution on the microbial diversity of a tropical river in an urbanized region of northeastern Brazil. Int Microbiol 2017; 20: 11– 24. Google Scholar PubMed Kong LY. Inside China's grand plan to fight water pollution. 2016. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/inside-chinas-grand-plan-for-water-pollution-2015-05-04 (27 August 2017, date last accessed). Korenaga TA. Flow injection analyzer for chemical oxygen demand using potassium permanganate. Instrum Sci Technol 1980; 10: 273– 87. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Kulichevskaya IS, Suzina NE, Rijpstra WIC et al. Paludibaculum fermentans gen. nov., sp. nov., a facultative anaerobe capable of dissimilatory iron reduction from subdivision 3 of the Acidobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64: 2857– 64. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Landaud S, Helinck S, Bonnarme P. Formation of volatile sulfur compounds and metabolism of methionine and other sulfur compounds in fermented food. Appl Microbiol Biot 2008; 77: 1191– 205. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Latha PS, Rao KN. An integrated approach to assess the quality of groundwater in a coastal aquifer of Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Earth Sci 2012; 66: 2143– 69. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Leonard RH. Quantitative range of Nessler's reaction with ammonia. Clin Chem 1963; 9: 417– 22. Li D, Sharp JO, Drewes JE. Influence of wastewater discharge on the metabolic potential of the microbial community in river sediments. Microb Ecol 2016; 71: 78– 86. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Li XL, Zhang PC, Yu HC. Analysis on black color and odor of Weigong River in Shenyang. Environ Prote Sci 2003; 29: 27– 28. Lin C, He M, Liu S et al. Contents, enrichment, toxicity and baselines of trace elements in the estuarine and coastal sediments of the Daliao River System, China. J Geochem Explor 2012; 46: 371– 80. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Lin S, Wang Y, Lin J et al. Response of planktonic and benthic microbial community to urban pollution from sewage discharge in Jilin Reach of the Second Songhua River, China. Clean Soil Air Water 2014; 42: 1376– 83. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Linares P, De Castro MD, Valcarcel M et al. Simultaneous determination of carbon dioxide and sulphur dioxide in wine by gas-diffusion/flow-injection analysis. Anal Chim Acta 1989; 225: 443– 8. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Liu J, Yang H, Zhao M et al. Spatial distribution patterns of benthic microbial communities along the Pearl Estuary, China. Syst Appl Microbiol 2014; 37: 578– 89. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Liu Z, Colin C, Huang W et al. Clay minerals in surface sediments of the Pearl River drainage basin and their contribution to the South China Sea. Chinese Sci Bull 2007; 52: 1101– 11. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Lovley DR. Dissimilatory Fe(III) and Mn(IV) reduction. Microbiol Res 1991; 55: 259– 87. Lovley DR. Organic matter mineralization with the reduction of ferric iron: a review. Geomicrobiol J 1987; 5: 375– 99. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Lovley DR, Coates JD, Bluntharris EL et al. Humic substances as electron acceptors for microbial respiration. Nature 1996; 382: 445– 8. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Lovley DR, Fraga JL, Bluntharris EL et al. Humic substances as a mediator for microbially catalyzed metal reduction. Acta Hydroch Hydrob 1998; 26: 152– 7. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Lovley DR, Klug MJ. Methanogenesis from methanol and methylamines and acetogenesis from hydrogen and carbon dioxide in the sediments of a eutrophic lake. Appl Environ Microbiol 1983; 45: 1310– 5. Google Scholar PubMed Lu XM, Chen C, Zheng TL. Metagenomic insights into effects of chemical pollutants on microbial community composition and function in estuarine sediments receiving polluted river water. Microb Ecol 2017; 73: 791– 800. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Luther GW. Pyrite synthesis via polysulfide compounds. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 1991; 55: 2839– 49. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Luo JH. The major reason influencing darkening and smelling of partial water in Guangzhou reach of Pearl River. Guangzhou Environ Sci 2001; 2: 003. Ma W, Chen K, Li Y et al. Advances in cadaverine bacterial production and its applications. Engineering 2017; 3: 308– 17. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Marcus DN, Pinto A, Anantharaman K et al. Diverse manganese (II)-oxidizing bacteria are prevalent in drinking water systems. Env Microbio Rep 2017; 9: 120– 8. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS McCoy N, Chao B, Gang DD et al. Nonpoint source pollution. Water Environ Res 2015; 87: 1576– 94. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Metzger E, Langlet D, Viollier E et al. Artificially induced migration of redox layers in a coastal sediment from the Northern Adriatic. Biogeosciences 2014; 11: 2211– 24. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Moore WA, Kroner RC, Ruchhoft CC et al. Dichromate reflux method for determination of oxygen consumed. Anal Chem 1949; 21: 953– 7. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Musat N, Halm H, Winterholler B et al. A single-cell view on the ecophysiology of anaerobic phototrophic bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105: 17861– 6. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Nealson KH, Little B. Breathing manganese and iron: solid-state respiration. Adv Appl Microbiol 1997; 45: 213– 39. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Nevin KP, Lovley DR. Potential for nonenzymatic reduction of Fe (III) via electron shuttling in subsurface sediments. Environ Sci Technol 2000; 34: 2472– 8. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Newton RJ, Jones SE, Eiler A et al. A guide to the natural history of freshwater lake bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2011; 75: 14– 49. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Odigie KO, Cohen AS, Swarzenski PW et al. Using lead isotopes and trace element records from two contrasting Lake Tanganyika sediment cores to assess watershed-Lake exchange. Appl Geochem 2014; 51: 184– 90. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Osman KT. Soils: Principles, Properties and Management . Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands 2013. Oshima M, Wei Y, Yamamoto M et al. Highly sensitive determination method for total carbonate in water samples by flow injection analysis coupled with gas-diffusion separation. Anal Sci 2001; 17: 1285– 1290. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Pham TN, Nam WJ, Jeon YJ et al. Volatile fatty acids production from marine macroalgae by anaerobic fermentation. Bioresource Technol 2012: 500– 3. Rickard DT. Kinetics and mechanism of pyrite formation at low temperatures. Am J Sci 1975; 275: 636– 52. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Rzepecki M. Dynamics of phosphorus in lacustrine sediments: the process of uptake/release of dissolved phosphorus by sediments in different habitats and lakes. J Ecol 2012; 60: 717– 40. Salcher M M, Pernthaler J, Posch T et al. Seasonal bloom dynamics and ecophysiology of the freshwater sister clade of SAR11 bacteria ‘that rule the waves’ (LD12). ISME J 2011; 5: 1242– 52. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Salonen K. A versatile method for the rapid and accurate determination of carbon by high temperature combustion. Limnol Oceanogr 1979; 24: 177– 83. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Sanford R, R Cole J, Tiedje J. Characterization and description of Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans gen. nov., sp. nov., an aryl-halorespiring facultative anaerobic myxobacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002; 68: 893– 900. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Savio D, Sinclair L, Ijaz UZ et al. Bacterial diversity along a 2600 km river continuum. Environ Microbiol 2015; 17: 4994– 5007. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Schippers A, Jorgensen BB. Biogeochemistry of pyrite and iron sulfide oxidation in marine sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 2002; 66: 85– 92. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Schöll K, Szövényi G. Planktonic rotifer assemblages of the danube river at Budapest after the red sludge pollution in Hungary. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2011; 87: 124– 8. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Sharp JH. Total organic carbon in seawater—comparison of measurements using persulfate oxidation and high temperature combustion. Mar Chem 1973; 1: 211– 29. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Siegert M, Taubert M, Seifert J et al. The nitrogen cycle in anaerobic methanotrophic mats of the Black Sea is linked to sulfate reduction and biomass decomposition. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2013; 86: 231– 45. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Solorzano L, Sharp JH. Determination of total dissolved nitrogen in natural waters. Limnol Oceanogr 1980; 25: 751– 4. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Song C, Liu X, Song Y et al. Key blackening and stinking pollutants in Dongsha River of Beijing: Spatial distribution and source identification. J Environ Manage 2017; 200: 335– 46. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Song S, Li F, Li J et al. Distribution and contamination risk assessment of dissolved trace metals in surface waters in the Yellow River Delta. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2013; 19: 1514– 29. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Stahl J. Black water and two peculiar types of stratification in an organically loaded strip-mine lake. Water Res 1979; 13: 467– 71. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Staley C, Unno T, Gould TJ et al. Application of Illumina next-generation sequencing to characterize the bacterial community of the Upper Mississippi River. J Appl Microbiol 2013; 115: 1147– 58. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Stanley EM. Environmental Chemistry . Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000. Sun J, Hu S, Sharma KR et al. An efficient method for measuring dissolved VOSCs in wastewater using GC-SCD with static headspace technique. Water Res 2014; 52: 208– 17. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Suzuki Y, Sugimura Y, Itoh T et al. A catalytic oxidation method for the determination of total nitrogen dissolved in seawater. Mar Chem 1985; 16: 83– 97. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Tabatabai MA. A rapid method for determination of sulfate in water samples. Environ Lett 1974; 7: 237– 43. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Tfaily MM, Chu RK, Toyoda J et al. Sequential extraction protocol for organic matter from soils and sediments using high resolution mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 2017; 972: 54– 61. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Thurman EM. Amino acids. Organic Geochemistry of Natural Waters . Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1985: 151– 80. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Van Langenhove H, Roelstraete K, Schamp N et al. GC-MS identification of odorous volatiles in wastewater. Water Res 1985; 19: 597– 603. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Van Neste A, Duce RA, Lee C et al. Methylamines in the marine atmosphere. Geophys Res Lett 1987; 14: 711– 4. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Vanselow AP. Preparation of Nessler's reagent. Ind Eng Chem Anal Ed 1940; 12: 516– 7. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Venkateswaran K, Moser DP, Dollhopf ME et al. Polyphasic taxonomy of the genus Shewanella and description of Shewanella oneidensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49: 705– 24. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Verstraete W, De Beer D, Pena M et al. Anaerobic bioprocessing of organic wastes. World J Microb Biot 1996; 12: 221– 38. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Viers J, Dupré B, Gaillardet J. Chemical composition of suspended sediments in World Rivers: New insights from a new database. Sci Total Environ 2009; 407: 853– 68. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Wang ZH, Chen ZY, Tao J et al. Clay Mineral Analysis of Sediments in the Changjiang Delta Plain and Its Application to the Late Quaternary Variations of Sea Level and Sediment Provenance. J Coastal Res 2006; 223: 683– 691. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Wang J, Wang Y, Bai J et al. High efficiency of inorganic nitrogen removal by integrating biofilm-electrode with constructed wetland: Autotrophic denitrifying bacteria analysis. Bioresource Technol 2017; 227: 7– 14. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Wang Y, Sheng HF, He Y et al. Comparison of the levels of bacterial diversity in freshwater, intertidal wetland, and marine sediments by using millions of Illumina tags. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012; 78: 8264– 71. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Weber S, Stubner S, Conrad R. Bacterial populations colonizing and degrading rice straw in anoxic paddy soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001; 67: 1318– 27. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Wu Z, Ren D, Zhou H et al. Sulfate reduction and formation of iron sulfide minerals in nearshore sediments from Qi’ao Island, Pearl River Estuary, Southern China. Quaten Int 2016; 452: 137– 47. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Wunderlichová L, Buňková L, Koutný M et al. Formation, degradation, and detoxification of putrescine by foodborne bacteria: A review. Compr Rev Food Sci F 2014; 13: 1012– 30. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Xie Y, Wang J, Wu Y et al. Using in situ bacterial communities to monitor contaminants in river sediments. Environ Pollut 2016; 212: 348– 57. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Yan T, Zhou MJ, Zou JZ. A national report on harmful algal blooms in China. In: Taylor FJR, Trainer VL (eds). Harmful Algal Blooms in the PICES Region of the North Pacific . PICES Scientific Report No. 23. Sidney, BC, Canada: PICES, 2002, pp. 21– 37. Yang S, Jung HS, Lim DI et al. A review on the provenance discrimination of sediments in the Yellow Sea. Earth Sci Rev 2003; 63: 93– 120. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Ying TL, Zhang GY, Wu XX. The mechanism of blackening and stink and effects of resuspended sediments on Suzhou creek water quality. Shanghai Environ Sci 1997; 1: 009. Zhang J, Zhang R, Wu Q et al. Diagenetic alterations of amino acids and organic matter in the upper Pearl River Estuary surface sediments. Biogeosciences 2012; 9: 555. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Zhang X, Chen C, Ding J et al. The 2007 water crisis in Wuxi, China: analysis of the origin. J Hazard Mater 2010; 182: 130– 5. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Zhou J, He Q, Hemme CL et al. How sulphate-reducing microorganisms cope with stress: lessons from systems biology. Nat Rev Microbiol 2011; 9: 452– 66. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS PubMed Zhou Q, Gibson CE, Foy RH. Long-term changes of nitrogen and phosphorus loadings to a large lake in north-west Ireland. Water Res 2000; 34: 922– 6. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Zhu PW. Most cities in China exist black and odors water. Ecol Econ 2016; 32: 10– 13. Zwart G, Crump BC, Agterveld MPK et al. Typical freshwater bacteria: an analysis of available 16S rRNA gene sequences from plankton of lakes and rivers. Aquat Microb Ecol 2002; 28: 141– 55. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS © FEMS 2017. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
FEMS Microbiology Ecology – Oxford University Press
Published: Mar 1, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera