Abstract Elder abuse and neglect is one of the most important social problems in the world and it has grown together with global ageing. In this research, we analyse the meaning of elder abuse and its relationship to personal autonomy. After that, we study the scope and content of the Argentinean and Inter-American legal institutions presently in force designed to empower older people and prevent this problem. Fortunately, Argentinian Law and the new Inter-American Convention recognize some strong instruments to prevent elder abuse, promote personal autonomy, and the empowerment of the elderly in dependency situations. The first steps have been taken. I. INTRODUCTION Autonomy, which includes self-determination and legal capacity, is relevant to our dignity and human condition. It is based on the principle of equality and non-discrimination contained in Article 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which claims that ‘everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms … without distinction of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language, religion, political choice, national or social origin, property, birth or other status’ (United Nations [UN], 1948). Thus, the principles of equality and non-discrimination declare that all people must be treated equally before the law. This is key to ensuring the exercise of rights and freedoms on an equal basis for everyone (Dworkin, 1978, 1987; Dabove, 2002). However, there are many circumstances in which this principle is not achieved. Some are the prejudices against affected groups. On a global scale, for example, the elderly and people with mental illnesses or disabilities are often restricted unlawfully in the exercise of their legal capacity or may even lose it completely precisely because of cultural biases about ageing or impairment (Lipp, 2016). Other situations are even worse, such as the problem of abuse and violence against older people and people with serious disabilities. This article is aimed at considering ways of preventing these kinds of abuses, mistreatment, and negligence in regard to capable and healthy elders, and also in regard to older adults with significant mental problems. If the promotion of autonomy and independent life is a good strategy, how do human rights ensure this self-determination? What are the legal safeguards protecting these people against exploitation and domination. Finally, in what ways can Elder Law contribute to developing a self-determined life that allows the elderly to act autonomously and independently in their daily life (Lipp, 2016). To fulfil these purposes, the article first discusses what elder abuse really means, its most common cases, and the Argentinian and American legal instruments which refer to this problem. Secondly, it considers the concept of ‘personal autonomy’ to identify the most appropriate institutions for the prevention of abuse of capable older people in Argentinian Law and in the Inter-American system of human rights. Thirdly, it analyses the legal acts in force in the region that empower elder people who are judicially restricted in their capacity. II. ELDER ABUSE AND NEGLECT 1. Concepts, cases, and elements Elder abuse and neglect is one of the most important social problems in the world and it has grown together with global ageing. It can cause serious physical injuries, emotional suffering, long-term psychological disorders, or even the death of an older person – capable or incapable, and it can occur in the public or private sphere (WHO, 2002, 2008; Quinn and Tomita, 1997; Cohen et al, 2010). The new Inter-American Convention on Protecting the Human Rights of Older Persons, approved by the Organization of American States (OAS) General Assembly on 15 June 2015 and in force since January 2017, defined it as ‘a single or repeated act or omission to the detriment of an older person that harms their physical, mental or moral integrity and infringes the enjoyment or exercise of their human rights and fundamental freedoms, regardless of whether or not it occurs in a relationship of trust’ (OAS, 2015). It may also reflect intentional or unintentional neglect (WHO, 2002). Globally, between four and six per cent of old people have experienced some form of abuse (WHO, 2015) and it is estimated that one in ten experience abuse each month (WHO, 2016). But as the number of the elderly is growing fast (from 12 per cent to 22 per cent between 2015 and 2050), this figure will increase too, unless legal systems do something to prevent it (WHO, 2015, 2016). While there is little information regarding abuse and neglect in Argentina, at least around 5.71 per cent of victims of violence are of the age group 60 and even older (Consejo Nacional de Mujeres, 2016). Unfortunately, not all the cases are reported, in part because older people are often afraid of reporting cases of abuse to family, friends, or to the authorities. Consequently, any prevalence rates are likely to be an underestimate (WHO, 2016). Many old people are mistreated in their own homes, in relatives’ homes, and even in institutional settings, especially in long-term care facilities (International Network for the Prevention of Elder Abuse [INPEA], 2016; Ayalon 2016; Doron and Talia, 2013). Abusers are often adult children or other family members, such as grandchildren, spouses, or partners of the elders (Helpguide.org 2016; National Committee for the Prevention of Elder Abuse [NCPEA], 2016; Consejo Nacional de Mujeres, 2016). But also, ‘judicial practices perpetuate age-based stereotypes and discrimination’, (Love, Kelly and Doron, 2013: 253). Older women are the most vulnerable of all (American Psychological Association [APA], 2016). The Toronto Declaration (WHO, 2002) and the new Inter-American Convention on Protecting the Human Rights of Older People recognize different kinds of abuse. They include financial abuse, physical and sexual violence, psychological mistreatment, expulsion from the community, and any form of abandonment or negligence that takes place within the family or household unit or that is perpetrated or tolerated by the State or its agents, regardless of where it occurs (Article 9, OAS, 2015). Financial or material exploitation is the illegal or improper use of an elder’s funds, property, or assets. Physical violence is the use of physical force that may result in bodily injuries, physical pain, or impairment. Sexual abuse is the non-consensual sexual contact of any kind with an elderly person. Psychological mistreatment is the infliction of anguish, pain, or distress through verbal or non-verbal acts or ageism. Abandonment is the lack of action, deliberate or not, to give integral care to an older person’s needs, which may endanger their life or their physical, psychological, or moral integrity (WHO, 2002; OAS, 2015). According to the WHO, the most common types of abuse in developed and developing countries are: ✓ Physical abuse: 0.2–4.9 per cent. ✓ Sexual abuse: 0.04–0.82 per cent. ✓ psychological abuse: 0.7–6.3 per cent (based on substantive threshold criteria). ✓ Financial abuse: 1.0–9.2 per cent. ✓ Neglect: 0.2–5.5 per cent.Data on the extent of these problems in institutions such as hospitals, nursing homes, and other long-term care facilities is scarce. A survey of nursing home staff in the USA, however, suggests rates may be higher – 36 per cent witnessed at least one incident of physical abuse of an elderly patient in the previous year; 10 per cent committed at least one act of physical abuse towards an elderly patient; and 40 per cent admitted to have abused patients psychologically (WHO, 2016). In Argentina, the main cause of elder abuse is linked to unmet needs for housing, health, and food. With respect to the types of violence, 47 per cent is psychological, 27 per cent is abandonment, while physical aggression and financial violence both stand at 13 per cent. In addition, 75 per cent of older adults who report abuse are women (Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Secretaría de la Tercera Edad, 2016; Consejo Nacional de Mujeres, 2016). 2. Argentinian legal instruments and the Inter-American Law As human beings, older people have the right to a life without any kind of violence or mistreatment on an equal basis with all the people. For this reason, states, communities, and families have the obligation to work to eradicate stereotypes, prejudices, and misconceptions which often undermine the quality of life of the elderly (Arias and Iacub, 2015). The Argentinian Constitution recognizes those rights and duties especially in Articles 16 and 37 about equality, and in Article 18, when it refers to the abolition of the death penalty for political reasons and the prohibition of all kinds of torture and whipping. Besides, since 1994, the Constitution has incorporated several international human rights treaties, such as the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Argentinian Constitution, Articles 75 inc. 22 and 23). However, in Argentina, there are two types of legislation designed to eradicate abuse and mistreatment; federal and regional. Nationally, there is the National Act against Domestic Violence (N° 24.417/94) and the National Act to Prevent, Punish and Eradicate Violence against Women (N° 26.485/09). At a provincial level, there are laws against violence, including the Buenos Aires Local Act to Prevent, Punish and Eradicate Violence against Older People (N° 5420/15) (Dabove, 1999; Dabove and Urrutia, 2015). According to these instruments, claims of violence can be made by the victims themselves; relatives, spouses, or partners; friends, curators, or legal guardians; social or educational welfare services (public or private); health professionals; any public official because of their work; or any person who has knowledge of these facts. Complaints may remain anonymous and may be processed at the nearest police station, or before any judge, or the Attorney General, or the Office of Domestic Violence of the National Supreme Court (OVD), or before the National Committee Coordinating Actions for the Development of Sanctions regarding Gender Violence (CONSAVIG), among others. Once the complaint is submitted, the judges must decide quickly on the basis of evidence obtained in the investigation. They can choose between household exclusion of the aggressor or his detention, establishing a measure prohibiting presence or communication with the victim, requiring the aggressor to undergo psychological treatment, and other preventive measures (Dabove, 1999; Dabove and Urrutia, 2015). III. THE PROMOTION OF AUTONOMY OF THE ELDERLY 1. Autonomy: concept and elements ‘Autonomy’ derives from the Greek word meaning ‘self-rule and self-government’ and legally refers to the ability to decide by oneself, to make informed choices, free of coercion, based on one's own personal beliefs and values (NCPEA, 2016). It is also the sphere of personal independence, freedom, and opportunities, within which each person exercises his/her own power, rights, and duties, without invading those that belong to others (Dabove, 2016). The law has the mission to protect and to guarantee this, especially when the autonomy belongs to people who are in vulnerable situations such as the elderly. In this context, the new legal system recognizes at least two kinds of elders: capable people and people with judicially restricted capacity (Dabove, 2015). Nevertheless, it is important to say that the Argentine Law has experienced a significant change in relation to personal autonomy as a result of the reception of the UN CRPD (Palacios and Bariffi, 2007; Rosales, 2013). In particular, Article 12 of the CRPD introduced a Copernican revolution in the concept of autonomy through reform of the law of legal capacity which protects the right of people with disabilities to exercise legal agency with more clarity than any prior human rights instrument (Arstein-Kerslake and Flynn, 2017; Minkowitz, 2017). First, the CRPD does not draw any distinction between capacity for enjoyment (on the one hand) and capacity for exercise (on the other), once these capacities have been fully acquired at the age of 18 years (Article 12). Secondly, it considers that any person with disabilities (even those with mental illnesses) has the right for the acknowledgment of their legal capacity on equal terms with everyone else (Articles 1, 3, 5, and 12). Furthermore, the Convention denies categorically any restriction on legal capacity that implies the total substitution of the person’s will (Article 12 (v)). Finally, it inserts the social paradigm of disability. The Convention says that disability is the consequence of barriers set by the social environment (Preamble, e), which avoid granting persons with disabilities their full and effective participation in society under equal conditions (Smith 2014; Dabove, 2016; De Bhailís, and Flynn, 2017; Dhanda, 2017). So, under the current Argentinian legislation, personal autonomy comprises two elements: legal capacity and will. Legal capacity is an important attribute that the law recognizes in everyone, including people with judicial restrictions on it, governing such basic things as: name, address, and civil status. There are two kinds of legal capacity: the capacity of enjoyment (the person’s prerogative to be entitled to enjoy rights and to fulfill duties) and the capacity of exercise (the right to legal agency, which refers to the ability to exercise these rights and assume these duties) (Argentine Civil Commercial Code [ACCC], Article 22). From the age of 18, all people (adults) are considered capable of enjoyment and exercise. So they are presumed to have decision-making abilities for themselves, discernment, self-determination, and freedom in all areas of their lives (ACCC, Article 25). This cannot be lost through the mere passage of time. Only severe causes, or situations that put their lives or their properties at risk, might allow restrictions to be placed on an individual’s right to exercise their own legal capacity to act and make choices (ACCC, Articles 22 and 23). Moreover, such restrictions may be set only by a judge. Free will is the other complex legal instrument of autonomy comprising three elements: discernment, intention, and liberty (ACCC 205, Article 260). For the civil doctrine, discernment is the prerogative of reasoning or the personal competence to recognize and distinguish right from wrong, just from unfair, convenient from inconvenient. Intention is the will’s direction or tendency, enlightened by discernment, which allows each person to put an idea into practice. Liberty is understood as the possibility of personal choice and the subject’s independence to exercise its rights and duties (Cifuentes, 2004; Zannoni, 2013; Dabove, 2016; Brosnan and Flynn, 2017). Thus, the legal system’s treatment of capacity and will guarantee the right to be free from unwanted interference and to require a legal or a judicial justification for any restriction of personal autonomy, all of which help towards the prevention of abuse of the elderly (Smith, 2014; NCPEA, 2016; Flynn and Arstein-Kerslake, 2017). 2. Legal instruments of Argentinian and Inter-American Law The legal protection of autonomy of adults is recognized by the National Constitution (NC) and by the International and the Inter-American Treaties on Protecting Human Rights ratified by Argentina (NC Article 75 inc. 22 and 23). One of the most important instruments concerning capacity and autonomy is the UN CRPD (Palacios and Bariffi, 2007; Rosales, 2013). However, now the OAS has added another: the new Inter-American Convention on Protecting the Human Rights of Older Persons. This instrument was approved by the General Assembly on 15 June 2015 and came into force in the Inter-American system of human rights in January 2017 (Sabatino, 2015; Roqué, 2015). The Inter-American Convention covers the special situation of the elderly (people aged 60 and over) and the special cases of persons who also suffer certain kinds of disabilities or diseases, especially affecting the oldest (Jessurun, 2016). But, in addition, other relevant instruments for protecting autonomy should be mentioned: the Argentinian Civil and Commercial Code that came into force in August 2015, the National Rights of Patients Act (No. 26,529 of 2009), and the National Mental Health Act (No. 26,657 of 2010), applicable in all the regions. Therefore, within Argentinian Law, every capable adult, regardless of disability or age, can exercise their rights by themselves or by representatives designated by themselves through formal or sometimes even not regular procedures. 3. Institutions to empower older people and guarantee autonomy In Argentina, there are different kinds of legal instruments that allow capable adults to exercise personal autonomy by themselves or by representatives designated by them and can help to prevent elder abuse. Among others, they are: advance directives or living wills, informed consents, contracts for mandate for their own disability forecast (explained below), representation to act in legal or financial matters (power of attorney), living trusts and substitution or replacement carried out by family members (Rajmil and Llorens, 2010, 2016). ‘Advance directives or living wills’ are legal documents that provide guidance or instructions concerning personal issues. Argentinian Law recognizes three kinds: (i) They can be established for medical, healthcare decisions or for the disposition regarding their own body, excluding euthanasia practices. (ii) They can also be used for property management. (iii) They can be given for the designation of the person who will exercise guardianship in the event the relevant elder becomes unable to make such decisions (ACCC, Articles 60, 139). This appointment has to be taken into account by judges in any future judicial proceedings concerning capacity. All can be affected by notarial deeds or by judicial procedures and they are registered in the National Information Center of Registers of Advance Directives. A capable person can give ‘informed consent’, a declaration of will expressed by the patient, issued after receiving clear, accurate, and appropriate information regarding medical procedures and health research (ACCC, Article 59). It is also possible to conclude a ‘contract for mandate for their own disability forecast and appoint a future guardian’ to take care of the elder person’s properties. This designation should be taken into account by judges in the judicial process of restriction of (ACCC, Articles 60 and 1319–1334). Moreover, any adult can designate a ‘representative to act in legal or financial matters’ in favour of any person who has his confidence and it is not necessary for the representative to be a lawyer. Such person could grant a general power to act in all legal or financial matters, or a special one to act in specific legal or financial matters. Under Argentinian Law, the designation of a representative is a legal act, not a contract. It has its own rules and for that reason it should be distinguished from the mandate or the trust agreement (ACCC, Articles 358–381). In the European Union, they are called ‘powers of attorney’ (Council’s Ministerial Recommendation on Principles concerning Powers of Attorney and Advance Directives for Incapacity: Recommendation CM/Rec (2009) 11). A capable adult can also constitute a ‘living trust’ which is a special contract, different from a mandate or power of attorney. In Argentina, it is regulated by the National Civil and Commercial Code and it is applied throughout the country (ACCC, Articles 1666–1670). According to Article 1666, there is a trust agreement when one party, called the settlor, conveys or agrees to transfer the ownership of his goods to another person, called the trustee, who is obliged to exercise it for the benefit of another, called the beneficiary, who is assigned by the contract. The trustee has the obligation to transfer the property upon completion of a deadline or condition, to the beneficiary. So, a trust agreement is a contractual relationship whereby property is held by one party for the benefit of the trust's beneficiaries. The beneficiary could also be the settlor; therefore, a capable person could enter into this contract on behalf of himself and in anticipation of his own inability. Another possibility is ‘substitution or replacement carried out by family members’. This is an informal or a factual way of representation which takes effect automatically (ex lege), when a person of full age who suffers from a mental disability is not able to take care of her or his own issues and there is no judicial process concerning her or his capacity (parens patria). Family members, and therefore possible substitutes or replacements, are: the spouse, the cohabiting partner, consanguineous relatives within the fourth grade, such as parent, child, and grandparent, and great-grandparent (Guzmán et al, 2003; Arias, 2013). The State through the Public Ministry can also act to protect the person at risk (CCC, Article 102). IV. THE ELDERLY WITH RESTRICTED CAPACITY: JUDICIAL MEASURES AND MONITORING SYSTEMS OF GUARDIANSHIP 1. Concepts, cases, and elements When autonomy is affected significantly due to a cognitive impairment that puts personal life and property at risk, according to the new Civil and Commercial Code and the conventions on human rights, a judge may order restraints concerning legal capacity (of exercise) in three types of situations: partial restrictions in specific areas of personal autonomy where there is inability because of prodigality and in cases of incapacity or total incompetence in extremely critical situations (Dabove, 2016). In these cases, as a general rule judges should designate an appropriate support system for decision-making, such as personal assistants, legal representatives, or guardians (only for severe mental disabilities), specifying their functions based on the needs and circumstances of the person. In any case, they should promote the autonomy and favour decisions that respond to the preferences of the protected person (ACCC, Articles 31, 32, 43, 100 and 101). In the judicial procedure concerning capacity of exercise, judges should choose between appointing a representative, a personal assistant, or a guardian ad litem or temporary. But at the end of the trial, they have to designate the permanent guardian. They can also select between a guardianship of the person, a conservatorship of the property, and a full guardianship. Only judges can decide on the appointment of a supporter/legal representative. This disposition can be revised at any time, at the request of the person concerned. But the decision must be reviewed by the judge within a period not exceeding 3 years, on the basis of new assessments and involving a personal interview with the applicant (ACCC, Article 40). The judge can terminate this declaration if the person is completely recovered (Dabove, 2016). 2. Judicial measures and the principle of least restricted capacity There are several conditions which could bring about a judicial procedure concerning capacity (ACCC, Articles 22 and 23) such as: drugs and alcoholic addictions, a permanent or prolonged mental impairment of sufficient severity, the risk of damage to a person’s life or their property, and the absolute impossibility of acting and making choices by themselves (e.g. in terminal illness). During the trial, interdisciplinary assessments must be made to prove those conditions. Judges have to undertake personal interviews with the alleged incapable person. The decision should be made regarding the following aspects related to the person concerned: (i) diagnosis and prognosis; (ii) period when the situation was manifested; (iii) personal, family, and social resources; (iv) protection regime, support, and promotion of the greatest possible autonomy. Also, according to the new ACCC, judges must decide upon applying the least restrictive principle of capacity. Another important innovation is Article 33 of the new ACCC concerning the parties who have standing to request a judicial declaration of restricted capacity, inability, or incapacity. This can now be requested by the person concerned, a spouse who is not separated in fact, a cohabiting partner while cohabitation has not ceased, relatives within the fourth degree (grandparents, parents, sons, or grandsons), if they have affinity within the second degree (parents-in-law, sons, and daughters-in-law), or the Public Ministry. The judicial procedure should be developed with the necessary participation of the Public Ministry (ACCC, Article 103), but the operation of this procedure varies in each province, because Argentina is a Federal Republic and procedural regulations are within the domain of each province (Dabove, 2016). 3. The new guardianship Guardianship is a legal institution, to safeguard the welfare or the property of an adult whose intellectual or mental impairment prevents them from making responsible decisions. Traditionally, the term ‘guardianship’ was used to describe the substitute decision-making for both person and property. But the new Argentinian Civil and Commercial Code has changed this and recognizes new meanings of guardianship such as: representation and personal assistance, support, and reasonable safeguards (Articles 32–43 and 100–140). However, the Code has maintained other meanings connected with judicial procedures such as guardianship ad litem or temporary guardianship; definitive guardianship; guardianship of the person; conservatorship of property; and full guardianship (Ganner and Dabove, 2015). Nevertheless, any guardian will assist restricted persons only in relevant acts concerning patrimonial matters as specified by the court. The guardian can also be responsible for other functions too, such as giving assistance in healthcare, housekeeping, or entertainment if the person is not able to perform these functions autonomously. The guardian must report his activities to the judge (ACCC, Articles 130–134). In Argentina professional supporters, legal representatives or guardians participate in the judicial procedure. Before any judicial decision is reached, the court has to appoint a ‘temporary guardian’ – or a ‘supported decision-maker’, whose task is to control the legitimacy of the process, under ACCC Articles 34–37. This temporary guardian must be a lawyer, who is appointed to intervene at the beginning of the process and who is in charge until it finishes. In making the appointment, judges take into account the financial circumstances of those entitled to be guardians according to the ACCC, to fulfil his obligations without conflict of interests between them. Private attorneys or public lawyers can be appointed as guardians for people without resources. Private attorneys must have been previously registered in the Court of Appeal. In court proceedings, the role of the ‘temporary guardian’ can never be assumed by a family member or by the person who files the incapacity lawsuit, because there could be a conflict of interest between the petitioner and the respondent. What is sought throughout the process is the designation of a third party, to ensure that the respondent is assured of effective protection in court. The appointment of a special guardian to property occurs only when it is necessary to take urgent action, before the judicial decision is reached. It is a precautionary measure in the form of an anticipatory jurisdiction because a person is denied the management of his asserts without the mediation of judgement. It should only be adopted when it has been shown that, if urgent conservation action is not taken, the person’s estate will be adversely affected. Only this function may be performed by a family member during the judicial procedure, and it is not necessary for him/her to be a lawyer. However, if this is not possible or desirable, the function can be assigned to a state official or a private attorney, according to the value of the estate of the person whose capacity is in question. The costs for procedures and the supporter/legal representative are paid in two ways. If the person has sufficient resources, the court appoints a private attorney, who is selected from a list of professionals who have been previously registered in the Court of Appeal. The fees are met from the person’s assets, unless the application is rejected and, in that case, the fees should be covered by the petitioner. If the person has no adequate resources to meet the potential costs, the judge will designate a public lawyer, as a temporary or maybe as a definitive guardian. In each province, the role of the public guardian (temporary or definitive), for people without resources, is allocated to the Poor and Absent Defenders, public lawyers whose salaries are paid by each State (Ganner and Dabove, 2015; Dabove, 2016). 4. Monitoring systems: the role of families, volunteers, and judges During the judicial procedure, family members have to be available to attend properly prepared so that the process can take place without delays. If urgent action is needed before the final judicial decision is made, some of them can be designated as a ‘guardian to property’ in patrimonial actions as a precautionary measure to protect the person’s estate only. After the trial, the court appoints the definitive guardian of the person. The guardian may be one or more relatives; preferably the wife, husband, or an adult child, in accordance with ACCC, Articles 100–103. So, there may be more than one ‘definitive’ guardian. In any case, this guardian is designated to render assistance, support, or representation to anyone whose capacity is restricted and this function ends when the person dies or when the person regains legal capacity under ACCC, Article 138. Otherwise, according to the new ACCC, Article 139, a capable person can (with a living will) appoint a person as his future guardian. On other hand, in Argentinian Law, volunteers (who have full legal capacity: ACCC, Article 110) can make complaints to the public ministry if a person is living in a dangerous situation and they can give support by making decisions regarding the person’s conduct, managing his property and performing any required legal acts with the corresponding judicial authorization. Meanwhile, guardians, supporters, or legal representatives are supervised to ensure that the rights, the will, and the preferences of the adult concerned are respected (cf. Article 12 section four UN CRPD). Every year, they have to present a complete report to the court, specifying all their activities. The duty of filing the report is on the individual and only those who fulfil it will receive judicial approval according to ACCC, Articles 130–140 (Ganner and Dabove, 2015). V. CONCLUSIONS The promotion of personal autonomy and the empowerment of the elderly in dependency situations contribute to eradicate elder abuse. Argentinian Law and the new Inter American Convention recognize some instruments to fulfil this purpose. These include living wills or advance directives, free and informed consent on health matters, intervention of volunteers and social networks, access to phone calls or computer monitoring systems, judicial control on safeguards relating to the exercise of legal capacity, the development of training programmes about elder rights for family members, caregivers, guardians, security forces, judges, lawyers, notaries, and their diffusion by mass media. REFERENCES American Psychological Association ( 2016) Elder Abuse. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/pi/prevent-violence/resources/elder-abuse.aspx (accessed 10 May 2016). Arias C. J. ( 2013) ‘El apoyo social en la vejez: la familia, los amigos y la comunidad’, Revista Kairós Gerontologia 16(4), Dossiê Gerontologia Social, 313–29. Arias C. J., Iacub R. ( 2015) ‘Aspectos positivos en la investigación e intervención con personas mayores’, Revista Kairós Gerontologia 18( 20), 1– 13. Arstein-Kerslake A., Flynn E. ( 2017) ‘ The right to legal agency: domination, disability and the protections of Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’, International Journal of Law in Context 13( 1), 22– 38. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Ayalon L. ( 2016) ‘ A triadic perspective on elder neglect within the home care arrangement’, Ageing and Society 36( 4), 811– 36. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Brosnan L., Flynn E. ( 2017) ‘ Freedom to negotiate: a proposal extricating “capacity” from “consent”’, International Journal of Law in Context 13( 1), 58– 76. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Cifuentes S. ( 2004) ‘El acto voluntario’ in Negocio jurídico , 2nd edn, Buenos Aires: Astrea, 46– 114. Cohen M., Halevy-Levin S., Gagin R., Priltuzky D., Friedman G. ( 2010) ‘ Elder abuse in long-term care residences and the risk indicators’, Ageing and Society 30( 6), 1027– 40. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Consejo Nacional de Mujeres ( 2016), Informe Estadístico, mayo 2016. Retrieved from http://www.cnm.gov.ar/recursos/EstadisticasLinea144_Mayoper cent202016.pdf (accessed 10 May 2016). Consejo Nacional de Mujeres ( 2016), Informe Estadístico, octubre 2016. Retrieved from http://www.cnm.gov.ar/linea144.php (accessed 10 May 2016). Council’s Ministerial ( 2009) Recommendation on Principles Concerning Powers of Attorney and Advance Directives for Incapacity, 2009/11. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/cdcj/CDCJ%20Recommendations/CM_Rec(2009)11E_Principles%20on%20powers%20of%20attorney.pdf (accessed 8 March 2016). Dabove M. I. ( 1999) Violencia y ancianidad. Sugerencias para la Reforma de Leyes, DJ , 1999-2, 1165– 72. Dabove M. I. ( 2002) Los derechos de los ancianos , Buenos Aires: Ciudad Argentina, 41– 77. Dabove M. I. ( 2015) Derechos humanos de las personas mayores: acceso a la justicia y protección internacional , Buenos Aires: Astrea. Dabove M. I. ( 2016) ‘Autonomy and capacity: about human rights of older persons in dependency situations’, Ageing International . Dabove M. I., Urrutia M. ( 2015) ‘Violencia, vejez y género. El acompañamiento telefónico: una estrategia posible de prevención’, Derecho y Ciencias Sociales 12, 17– 43. Dhanda A. ( 2017) ‘ Conversations between the proponents of the new paradigm of legal capacity’, International Journal of Law in Context 13( 1), 87– 95. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS De Bhailís C., Flynn E. ( 2017) ‘ Recognising legal capacity: commentary and analysis of Article 12 CRPD’, International Journal of Law in Context 13( 1), 6– 21. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Doron I., Talia M. ( 2013) ‘Elder abuse and neglect in Israel: To report of to inform? Community nurseś perspectives on policy dilemma’. Springfield, Ill., USA Global Ageing Issues and Policies. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/israel_doron/68/ (accessed 10 May 2016). Dworkin R. ( 1978) Talking Rights Seriously , Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 327– 48. Dworkin R. ( 1987) ‘What is equality? Part 3: the place of liberty’, Iowa Law Review 73( 1), 1– 54. Flynn E., Arstein-Kerslake A. ( 2017) ‘ State intervention in the lives of people with disabilities: the case for a disability-neutral framework’, International Journal of Law in Context 13( 1), 39– 57. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Ganner M., Dabove M. I. ( 2015) ‘Developments in Austrian and Argentine guardianship law’ in Coester-Waltjen D., Lipp V., Donovan W. M. (eds), Liber Amicorum for Makoto Arai , Baden-Baden: Nomos, 318– 40. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Secretaría de la Tercera Edad ( 2016) Aumentan las denuncias por maltrato a los adultos mayores. Retrieved from http://www.buenosaires.gob.ar/noticias/aumentan-las-denuncias-por-maltrato-los-adultos-mayores (accessed 8 July 2016). Guzmán J. M., Huenchuan S., Montes de Oca V. ( 2003) ‘Redes de apoyo social de las personas mayores: marco conceptual’, Notas de población 24( 77), 35– 71. Helpguide.org ( 2016) Abuse. Retrieved from http://www.helpguide.org/home-pages/abuse.htm (accessed 10 May 2016). International Network for the Prevention of Elder Abuse ( 2016) Who Violence Prevention Alliance. Retrieved from http://www.inpea.net/(accessed 12 October 2016). Jessurun R. ( 2016) Towards full realization and protection of all human rights of persons with dementia, ADI 2016 Conference Budapest, Retrieved from https://www.alz.co.uk/sites/default/files/conf2016/oc007-raymond-jessurun-towards-full-realization-and-protection-text.pdf (accessed 10 May 2016). Lipp V. ( 2016) 4th Annual World Congress on Adult Guardianship on September 14-17, 2016. (Blog post 25 January 2016) Retrieved from http://whaleyestatelitigation.com/blog/2016/01/4th-annual-world-congress-on-adult-guardianship-is-upcoming-on-september-14-17-2016/ (accessed 12 April 2016). Love H., Kelly F., Doron I. ( 2013) ‘Age and ageism in sentencing practices: outcomes from a case law review’, Canadian Criminal Law Review 17( 1), 1–7. Minkowitz T. ( 2017) ‘ CRPD and transformative equality’, International Journal of Law in Context 13( 1), 77– 86. Google Scholar CrossRef Search ADS National Committee for the Prevention of Elder Abuse ( 2016) Autonomy and Self-Determination. Retrieved from http://www.preventelderabuse.org/issues/autonomy.html (accessed 10 May 2016). Organization of American States ( 2015) Inter-American Convention on Protecting the Human Rights of Older Person (A-70). Retrieved from http://www.oas.org/en/sla/dil/inter_american_treaties_A-70_human_rights_older_persons.asp (accessed 10 May 2016). Organización Mundial de la Salud. ( 2015) Envejecimiento y ciclo de vida. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/ageing/ageing_facts/es/ (accessed 10 June 2016). Quinn M. J., Tomita S. K. ( 1997) Elder Abuse and Neglect. Causes, Diagnosis, and Interventional Strategies , 2nd edn, New York: Springer Publishing Company, 10– 360. Palacios A., Bariffi F. ( 2007) La discapacidad como una cuestión de derechos humanos. Una aproximación a la Convención Internacional sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad , Madrid: Cinca, 11– 135. Rajmil A. B., Llorens L. R. ( 2010) Derecho de autoprotección. Previsiones para la eventual pérdida del discernimiento . Buenos Aires: Astrea, 6– 260. Rajmil A. B., Llorens L. R. ( 2016) ‘Existen personas humanas incapaces de ejercicio en el derecho civil argentino?’ Revista de Derecho de Familia y de las Personas. La Ley 2, 145– 52. Rosales P. ( 2013) Discapacidad, justicia y Estado , Buenos Aires: Infojus, 3– 179. Roqué M. ( 2015) El camino de la comunidad internacional, In Dabove M. I. (dir) Derechos humanos de las personas mayores: Acceso a la justicia y protección internacional . Buenos Aires: Astrea, 67– 74. Sabatino C. ( 2015) ‘Human rights of older persons’, Bifocal: A Journal of the Commission on Law and Ageing 37( 2), 47– 48. Retrieved from http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/bifocal/BIFOCALNov-Dec2015.authcheckdam.pdf (accessed 10 May 2016). Smith A. ( 2014) ‘Are guardianship laws and practices consistent with human rights instruments?’ in Dayton A. K. (ed), Comparative Perspectives on Adult Guardianship , Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 247– 71. United Nations ( 1948) Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html (accessed 10 May 2016). World Health Organization ( 2002) Toronto Declaration on the Global Prevention of Elder Abuse. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/toronto_declaration/en/ (accessed 10 May 2016). World Health Organization ( 2002) ‘Abuse of the elderly’. In Krug E. G., Dahlberg L. L., Mercy J. A., Zwi A. B., Lozano R. (ed), World Report on Violence and Health , Geneva: Organization Health Press, 125– 45. World Health Organization ( 2008) A Global Response to Elder Abuse and Neglect: Building Primary Health Care Capacity to Deal with the Problem Worldwide: Main Report , Geneva: World Organization Health Press, 1– 33. World Health Organization ( 2015) World Report on Ageing and Health. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/ageing/events/world-report-2015-launch/en/ (accessed 23 November 2016). World Health Organization ( 2016) Elder Abuse. Fact Sheet. Reviewed September 2016. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/world-report-2015/en/ (accessed 23 November 2016). Zannoni E. ( 2013) Ineficacia y nulidad de los actos jurídicos , Buenos Aires: Astrea. © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: firstname.lastname@example.org
International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family – Oxford University Press
Published: Apr 1, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera